manufacturing interoperability guideline working group

12
Standards Certification Education & Training Publishing Conferences & Exhibits Manufacturing Interoperability Guideline Working Group (MIG WG) Keith Unger Chairman, ISA-SP95 [email protected]

Upload: thesupplychainniche

Post on 20-Jan-2015

565 views

Category:

Technology


0 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Manufacturing Interoperability Guideline Working Group

Standards

Certification

Education & Training

Publishing

Conferences & Exhibits

Manufacturing Interoperability Guideline Working Group(MIG WG)

Keith Unger

Chairman, ISA-SP95

[email protected]

Page 2: Manufacturing Interoperability Guideline Working Group

2

Keith Unger

• Principal MIT Consultant at Stone Technology Inc.– ERP / MES / Automation consulting– Chairman ISA-SP95 Enterprise – Control System Integration– Past Vice Chairman ISA-SP88 – Batch Control– Past Vice Chairman ISA-SP99 – Manufacturing Security

• 29 years manufacturing Information technology experience focused on the hybrid manufacturing industries (Consumer Goods, Food and Beverage, Specialty Chemical).

Page 3: Manufacturing Interoperability Guideline Working Group

3

Global Market Dynamics Drive Need for Manufacturing Interoperability

• Major manufacturers are standardizing business processes and data exchange practices globally

• Information exchange between plants and enterprise (near real time) is increasing

• Business flexibility– Responding to market needs key to profitability

Page 4: Manufacturing Interoperability Guideline Working Group

4

2005 Status of Plant 2 Business (P2B) Interoperable Standards Adoption

• Analysts feedback from software suppliers and customer organizations– Too many overlapping standards

• Simplification needed to avoid redundant and inconsistent integration software components (services)

• Customers need solutions that delivery– Near real time interoperability– Reduce cost and deployment time for system integration

• US. Dept of Commerce – NIST $billions are being lost – Across the manufacturing supply chain due to inadequate adoption of

data exchange standards and infrastructure

Page 5: Manufacturing Interoperability Guideline Working Group

5

2005 Discrete IOP Team Results and Conclusions

• ISA-95/B2MML terminology and models for process industries– ISA-95 standards and object models are easy to understand

• ISA-95 Standards provide– Terminology, abstract models and plant to business transactions

– ISA-59 Part 5 Transactions are based on ISA-95 Part 1, 2 and OAGIS

• OAGIS Business Object Document (BOD)– Consistent with United Nations specifications for common components

– Provides good coverage for discrete integration scenarios

– XML data schema is mature and detailed

• Object (data) models for complex discrete manufacturing processes should be simplified and merged with ISA-95 standards

Page 6: Manufacturing Interoperability Guideline Working Group

6

Standard Groups Agree to Convergence Efforts

• OAGi joins OpenO&MTM

– OAGi and ISA-SP95 joint agreement 12/8/05

• Manufacturing Interoperability Guideline Working Group– OAGi, ISA, MIMOSA, OPC and WBF establish

Memorandum of Agreement to form Guideline Working Group (MIG WG) with Customer Participation 3/23/06

– First MIG WG Meeting and Review 4/26-28/06

– Agree to issue Interim Guideline by January 2007 and Final Guideline by May 2007

MIG WGGuidelines

Page 7: Manufacturing Interoperability Guideline Working Group

7

OAGIS

ManufacturingOperations & Maintenance

Enterprise

Inter-Enterprise

MachineOPC DA, HDA, A&E, OMAC

Discrete Process

OAGIS

MIM

OS

A

MIM

OS

A

OP

C U

A ISA-95B2MMLOAGIS

F O U N D A T I O N

OpenO&MTM and the MIMOSA logo are marks of MIMOSA.

All other marks are the property of their respective owners.

.

OpenO&M™ ManufacturingDomain Mapping

Page 8: Manufacturing Interoperability Guideline Working Group

8

Manufacturing Interoperability Standards Customer Advisory Council

Page 9: Manufacturing Interoperability Guideline Working Group

9

Manufacturing Interoperability Standards & Customer Advisory Council Goal

• One top level generic ISA-95/OAGi manufacturing interoperability model is desired as much as practical. – Analysis of discrete and process manufacturing to identify additional

content needed in the model and standard.– Customer input is being used to help establish the ISA-95 Part 4

models.

Process Models

Discrete ModelsH

ybrid

M

odel

s

Page 10: Manufacturing Interoperability Guideline Working Group

10

Summary of Standards Contribution

• Manufacturing Interoperability Standards – Have reached a maturity level to begin convergence– Establish consistent data exchange practices across the enterprise and

supply chain – Have demonstrated reduced IT system cost and deployment time– Have improved timeliness of information availability to the enterprise

• Standards convergence will require involvement of customers, suppliers and standards groups – Improve and simplify standards content

Page 11: Manufacturing Interoperability Guideline Working Group

11

Key Contacts

• Alan T. Johnston – President – MIMOSA – Chair OpenO&M [email protected]

• David Emerson – WBF/B2MML WG - Director - OpenO&M MFG JWG [email protected]

• Thomas J. Burke – OPC Foundation President & Executive Director [email protected]

• David Connelly – President & CEO - Open Applications [email protected]

• Keith Unger – Chair - [email protected]

• Gary H. Sullivan – Chair – Manufacturing IOP Guideline Working [email protected]

• Greg Gorbach – ARC Advisory [email protected]

Page 12: Manufacturing Interoperability Guideline Working Group

12

ISA Values Your Input

• Questions on MIG-WG?

• Ideas / Suggestions?

• To get involved, contact:– Gary Sullivan, MIG WG Chair, [email protected]– Chip Lee, ISA, [email protected]

• Website: www.isa.org/mnfginterop