mangled extremity and vascular repair extremity.pdfmangled extremity severity score johansen k et...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair
Jason Sulkowski, MD
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 2: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Case Presentation • 9:50AM – 34 y F BIBEMS as pedestrian struck, +
LOC, GCS 15 in field
• Primary Survey: – A: intact, speaking – B: bilateral breath sounds, O2 saturation 100% – C: SBP 90s, HR 130s, distal pulses on ¾ extremities – D: Numbness and paralysis of left foot
– FAST: negative – CXR: no pneumothorax, no effusion
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 3: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
• Secondary Survey: – Neuro: sensation and motor absent in left lower
leg – Head: laceration on posterior scalp, above right
eye, and right mandible, numerous broken teeth – Neck: + midline tenderness – Chest: left chest tenderness – Pelvis: unstable, exquisite tenderness – Back: large superficial abrasion along left back – LLE: open tibia fracture with 20cm skin defect,
dislocated knee joint – RLE: mid femoral deformity
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 4: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Before All Else… 2+ 2+
2+
2+ 0+
0+
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 5: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
• Imaging Summary: – CT Head: neg – CT C-spine: C1 nondisplaced inferior anterior arch
fracture – CT Chest: small L PTX, L 2nd, 4th, 6th, 7th rib fracture – CT Abd: neg – CT TLS-spine: L2-4 transverse process fractures,
comminuted fracture of upper sacral alae to sacroiliac joint, comminuted L acetabular fracture, bilateral inferior and right superior pubic rami fractures
– CTA RLE: pseudoaneurysm of SFA, femur fracture – CTA LLE: cutoff of distal popliteal artery with
minimal reconstitution of posterior tibial, cuts off again at tibia fracture, peroneal and anterior tibial arteries not seen
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 6: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 7: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 8: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 9: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 10: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 11: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 12: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 13: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
• ED Interventions: – Foley placed – Bilateral LE splints – 2L fluid bolus – Massive transfusion protocol
• 3u PRBC • 1u FFP • 1u Plt
– Intubation
– Taken to OR
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 14: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
• 11:30AM – Initial OR Course: – Pelvic binder – Ex-fix to LLE and pelvis
• 12:30PM – Bypass:
– L peroneal artery exploration – On table angiogram showed good flow from peroneal
artery to foot – L SFA to peroneal bypass
• Non-reversed translocated greater saphenous vein, harvested from contralateral side
– On table angiogram showed runoff via peroneal bypass
– EBL: 400 – Fluids: 3000mL crystalloid, 6u PRBC, 9u FFP, 1u Plt
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 15: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
• 10:30PM – Orthopedic Intervention: – Adjustment of LLE ex-fix – Pelvic reduction, fixation – Irrigation and debridement of L grade IIIc open
tibia fracture
• 12:30AM – Interventional Radiology: – Angiogram: No contrast extravasation seen – LLE: Abrupt cutoff of flow at distal popliteal
artery with occlusion of popliteal-peroneal bypass, no reconstitution of flow distal to the popliteal artery
– RLE: 1.2cm pseudoaneurysm seen in SFA – IVC filter placed
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 16: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
• HD2 – Left above knee amputation
• HD4 – Right femur nailing, removal of ex-fix
• HD5 – ORIF L sacroiliac joint, R superior pubic ramus, L acetabulum, pubic symphysis; CRIF R sacroiliac joint; removal of ex-fix
• HD9 – ORIF L acetabulum revision
• Since then… – Multiple trips to OR for hematoma evacuations, VAC
changes
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 17: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Questions? www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 18: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Before All Else… www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 19: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Lower Extremity Anatomy
• Vascular anatomy
• Nerve distribution
• Compartments
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 20: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Vascular Anatomy
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 21: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Vascular Anatomy
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 22: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Relative Frequency of Vascular Trauma
Rutherford’s Vascular Surgery, 8th Ed.
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 23: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Nerve Distribution
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 24: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Compartments – Lower Leg
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 25: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Compartments – Upper Leg
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 26: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Vascular Injury – Physical Exam • Hard signs
– Absent distal pulses – Palpable or audible thrill – Expanding hematoma – Pulsatile bleeding
• Soft signs
– Diminished distal pulses – History of significant bleeding – Neurologic deficit – Proximity of wound to vessel
• Hard signs present in only 30% with vascular injury
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 27: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Vascular Injury – Imaging • Plain x-ray: evaluate
for orthopedic injuries
• CTA: evaluate arterial system – Extravasation – Dissection – Thrombosis
• Angiography
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 28: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Evaluation of Orthopedic Injuries • Neurovascular status
• Open vs Closed
• Location
• Alignment / Articular involvement
• Rotation
• Displacement
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 29: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Gustilo Open Fracture Classification
• Early stabilization – Provide comfort – Easier transport – Improve neurovascular compromise
Category Description
Class I Clean wound, <1 cm
Class II Wound >1 cm, no significant tissue loss
Class III Wound >5 cm, tissue loss
IIIA Periosteal coverage
IIIB Significant periosteal loss
IIIC Associated vascular injury
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 30: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Infection Prophylaxis • Tetanus
– Toxoid – Immunoglobulin
• Antibiotics
– Add penicillin if “barnyard” or soil contamination is present
Category Likely Organism Antibiotic Duration Class I G+ cocci 1st gen cephalosporin 24 hours
Class II G+ cocci 1st gen cephalosporin + gentamicin 24-48 hours
Class III (all) G+ cocci, G- rod 1st gen cephalosporin + gentamicin 48-72 hours
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 31: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Mangled Extremity • Damage to multiple tissue types
– Skin – Muscle – Bone – Nerve – Blood vessels
• Primary amputation or salvage?
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 32: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Mangled Extremity Severity Score • Retrospective analysis, 26 limbs
– 17 salvaged – 9 amputated – Used to develop the MESS
• Prospective analysis, 26 limbs
– 14 salvaged – 12 amputated – MESS ≥7 predicted amputation in 100% of cases
Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72.
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 33: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Mangled Extremity Severity Score
Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72.
Category Description Score Musculoskeletal
Low-energy Stab wounds, closed fractures, low-caliber GSW 1
Medium-energy Open or multi-level fractures, moderate crush injury 2
High-energy Shotgun, high-caliber GSW, crush injury 3
Very high-energy Above + contamination, tissue avulsion 4
Shock
Normal BP stable in field and in OR 0
Transient hypotension BP unstable in field, responsive to IV fluids 1
Prolonged hypotension SBP <90 in field, responsive to IV fluids in OR only 2
Ischemia (score x2 if >6hrs)
None Pulsatile limb, no ischemia 0
Mild Pulse reduced or absent, no ischemia 1
Moderate Pulseless, diminished cap refill; parasthesia 2
Advanced Pulseless, absent cap refill; paralyzed, numb 3
Age
<30 0
30 to <50 1
50+ 2
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 34: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Other Mangled Extremity Classifications • Predictive Salvage Index (PSI)
– Howe HR et al. Am Surg. 1987; 53:205-8.
• NISSSA
– McNamara MG et al. J Orthop Trauma. 1994; 8: 81-7.
• Limb Salvage Index (LSI)
– Russel WL et al. Ann Surg. 1991; 213:473-80.
• Hannover Fracture Scale (HFS)
– Tscherne H, et al. Unfallheilkunde. 1982; 85:111-5.
Bosse MJ et al. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001; 83(1): 3-14.
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 35: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Lower Extremity Assessment Project • Prospective, multicenter trial (LEAP trial)
– >600 patients 16-69 years with significant lower extremity injuries
• Analysis of 5 scoring systems’ ability to predict amputation – Evaluated with immediate amputations
included and excluded
• Sensitivity, specificity, area under the receiver-operator curve
• Conclusion: all performed poorly
Bosse MJ et al. J Bone Joint Surg. 2001; 83(1): 3-14.
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 36: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 37: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Adapted from “Treatment Approaches to the Severely Injured Extremity”, published by American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma, 2008
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 38: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Vascular Repair • Ischemia time significant predictor of limb
salvage or amputation
• Addressing arterial injuries early will improve salvage
• Options – Intraluminal shunt – Definitive reconstruction
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 39: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Shunt: Pro & Con • Pro:
– Restore blood flow distal to injury while more life threatening thoracic / abdominal injuries are managed
– Skeletal stabilization can protect subsequent definitive reconstruction
• Con: – Extra step that takes time and delays definitive
reconstruction – May cause vessel complications (e.g. dissection,
thrombosis)
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 40: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Shunt: Pro & Con • Pro:
– Starr A et al. J Trauma. 1996; 4: 17-21. – Reber P et al., J Trauma. 1999; 47: 72-6. – Hossny A. J Vasc Surg. 2004; 40: 61-6. – Hornez E et al., J Visc Surg. 2015; 152: 363-8.
• Con:
– Wagner W et al., J Vasc Surg. 1988; 7: 736-43. – Nair R. Br J Surg. 2000; 87: 602-7. – Hafez H et al., J Vasc Surg. 2001; 33: 1212-9. – Huynh TTT et al., Am J Surg. 2006; 192: 773-8.
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 41: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Multicenter Shunt Study Group • Multicenter, retrospective review
– 201 patients had temporary intravascular shunt (TIVS)
• Included extremity and trunk injuries
• Shunt indications – Damage control: 63.4% – Combined orthopedic injury: 36.1%
• Type of shunt
– Argyle: 81.2% – Pruitt-Inahara: 9.4% – Chest tube / Feeding tube: 9.4%
Inaba K et al. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016; 80(3): 359-65.
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 42: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
• Complications prior to shunt removal: – Thrombosis: 5.6% – Compartment syndrome: 4.2% – Dislodgement: 1.4% – Amputation: 3.5%
• Predictors of graft failure (after shunt):
– Noncommercial vs commercial shunt • Adjusted odds ratio: 6.3 (1.2-32.0)
– Damage control vs combined orthopedic surgery • AOR: 3.3 (1.0-10.6)
• Predictor of mortality
– ISS >25 • AOR: 16.2 (1.6-162.1)
– Notably no factors related to the shunt!
Inaba K et al. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016; 80(3): 359-65.
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 43: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Inaba K et al. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2016; 80(3): 359-65.
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 44: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Lower Leg Fasciotomy www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 45: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Upper Leg Fasciotomy www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 46: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Definitive Vascular Reconstruction • Arteriorrhaphy
• Patch angioplasty
• Resection and end-to-end
anastomosis
• Resection and interposition graft
• Bypass graft
• Extra-anatomic bypass
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 47: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Autogenous vs Graft • 3 year patency for infrapopliteal
reconstruction: – 70-80% with autogenous vein – 30-50% for prosthetic graft
• Autogenous: contralateral saphenous vein
• Prosthetics
– Dacron – PTFE
• Vein cuff at distal anastomosis improves
patency (52% vs 29% at 2 years)
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 48: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Venous Repair • Venous ligation better tolerated than arterial
• Repair should be attempted when possible
– Reduce acute venous hypertension – Reduced phlegmasia – No increase in thrombosis or thromboembolism
• Ligation is best when:
– Patient is in poor physiologic condition – Multiple injuries – Requires long segment interposition grafting or
synthetics
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 49: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Summary • Life > Limb
• Primary amputation considered when
– Organ failure or severe shock is present – Crush injury, severe soft tissue loss, segmental
bone loss
• Limb salvage starts with re-establishing arterial inflow with shunt or definitive reconstruction
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 50: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Additional References • Atlas of Trauma / Emergency Surgical
Techniques. Ed. Cioffi, WG et al. 2014.
• Current Therapy of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Second Edition. Ed. Asensio JA et al. 2016.
• Rich’s Vascular Trauma, Third Edition. Ed.
Rasmussen TE et al. 2016.
• Rutherford’s Vascular Surgery, Eighth Edition. Ed. Cronenwett Jl et al. 2014.
www.downstatesurgery.org
![Page 51: Mangled Extremity and Vascular Repair extremity.pdfMangled Extremity Severity Score Johansen K et al. J Trauma. 1990; 30(5): 568-72. Category Description Score Musculoskeletal Low-energy](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022062515/5ee0cafead6a402d666be644/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
www.downstatesurgery.org