managing partner's feedbacks through the geo-web
DESCRIPTION
Presentation at the 1st EuroSDR WorkshopCrowd Sourcing for UpdatingNational Databases. Project ‘Echange’ and the mapshare portal RIPart of IGN France.TRANSCRIPT
1/9
Managing partner’s feedbacks through the web
Jean-Marc Viglino, IGN-France
1st EuroSDR Workshop
Crowd Sourcingfor UpdatingNational Databases
2/9
The Large Scale Reference system (RGE®)
Orthophoto component Topographic component
Parcel plan component Address component
from classical to on the fly updating
Main difficulties:• to be informed of all changes • to capture geometry of features
main roads, railways, major facilities
electric networks, administrative data, addresses, facilities
buildings, orography, hydrography, …
on the fly updating
annual updates
classical updatesevery 5 years (down to 3?)
3/9
The partnership policy Aim: to save public money by integrating data already produced and maintained by institutional partners.
Post Office, Cadastral Agency, Forestry Agency, Electric network company, Railroad network company, Provincial Councils, Fire departments
Partner
GIS application
!
Today’s workflowPeriodic bulk exchanges between GIS managers and IGN
4/9
The modified partnership policy
Partner
updates
Validation
Integration
GIS applicationValidation
Integration
What we want to do!
Aim: smooth and more continuous integration of partners’ information and data, based on feedback management.
5/9
Storage
Data basemanagement
Users controller
Query /statistics
Workflowvalidation
Syndication
Applicationservice
model
Consultation
Back Office Front Office
Expert
FeedbackApplication
service
DBMS
Customizationmodule
Security access
customers
Feedback Management System
CMS + Geoportal API
!?
6/9
Feedback Management System
Plugin Geoportail(virtual map API)
file uploadfeedback service
…
CMS functions : front/back office – publishing – forum – author – statistics – configuration…
CMS
7/9
1. Why would people contribute?
2. What will we expect in terms of accuracy, reliability or completeness?
• It is easy to participate• Civic contribution (national databases) • Professional interest
Remaining questions
• Because they are nice partners…
• Partners already return information• Expert professional or authority
3. What are they expecting?• To use the service for they own data• To secure the data to their group• To take advantage of other partner’s feedbacks• To plug they own process on the service (input/output format)• To add they own layer (WMS, WFS…)
GroupConcept
(community)
Social networkProfessional investment
Social reward
Involved in the validation workflow
4. How to manage the workflow?
8/9
Experiment
Feedback management Groups definition Web service connections Consulting partners (tests)
Refine the workflowDefine evaluation (rating)
Integration to existing processes
.
http://ripart.ign.fr
Drawing tools Query tools …
9/9
Thank you for your attention