managing consortium finances – the case of carligh joel sam jsam@csir- insti.org/[email protected]
TRANSCRIPT
Managing Consortium Finances – the Case of CARLIGH
Background
• Economic downturn from the 1980s to the early 1990s
• Inadequate financial, human and material resources
• Serious problems - access to and delivery of relevant information
• 1993 – ILLDD Section of IFLA discussion
• 1996 – Informal cooperative network (GILLDNET)
Background, cont.
• 2002 - access to online databases through INASP
• Resources were very useful - ‘life’ into the libraries
• GILLDNET informed DANIDA support to cease - 2004
• Idea to establish a Consortium
Background, cont.
• Open to academic and research libraries
• Full and Affiliate members (40)
• Three tier governance structure
• Five Working Groups (Bibliographic services, ICT, Training and Human Resource Development, Advocacy and Marketing, E-Resources)
– E-resources negotiations, training, advocates for increased funding
Financing (1)
• Seed money of $40,000 - National Council for Tertiary Education
• Annual membership fee • Payment for e-Resources• Levies – periodic• Grants• Workshops and Conferences• Investment of funds– Fixed Deposit of Six Months/91-Day Treasury Bill
Financing (2)
• Formula for payment – – simple; equal payment irrespective of size and
usage– 12 databases (Ebsco Host, Emerald, Wiley, Taylor
and Francis, Sage, Credo) used by all consortium members
– Total amount divided by the number of members• Subscriptions for E-resources shared equally• Annual membership fee – equiv. of $220
Challenges
• Late payment of e-resources by members
• Members required to pay between November and March
• For 2015 – 1st Payment (25/11/14); Last Payment (14/09/15)
• Payment in local currency instead of US Dollars
Overcoming Challenges
• Investment of funds over the years• Transparency in management of finances• Reminders to head of institutions• Publish list of members not in good standing
(extreme case)• Call for proposals