malawi presentation4

21
1 RIGHT OR FIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT: Role of CSOs in Trade Policy Processes MAVUTO BAMUSI National Coordinator Human Rights Consultative Committee-HRCC

Upload: julien-grollier

Post on 20-May-2015

467 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Malawi presentation4

1

RIGHT OR FIGHT TO DEVELOPMENT: Role of CSOs in

Trade Policy Processes

MAVUTO BAMUSI

National Coordinator

Human Rights Consultative

Committee-HRCC

Page 2: Malawi presentation4

2

Summary

The right to development entails societal participation in national development policies including trade policies

Lack of people participation in previous policies has resulted into policy failures

However, Malawi has for some time been characterized by the fight to development as citizens are marginalized and CSOs have to fight for or beg for participation

Page 3: Malawi presentation4

3

Policy Dictatorship

Policy dictatorship reigns supreme in Malawi where an alliance of a handful technocrats connive with some donors to determine national policies for the entire population and invite a few CSOs for mere document coloring

The right to development means overthrowing the policy dictators through deliberate empowerment of poor sections of the population for participation

Donors have to show clear commitment in funding civil society towards democratic policy processes

Min. of Trade, EP &D and a few others have shown interest to remove tendencies of policy dictatorship by creating avenues for people participation

Page 4: Malawi presentation4

4

CSO Experiences in Policy Making Processes –the PRSP

Initially, CSOs role was less recognized PRSP was regarded too technical, very

difficult for CSOs to understand CSOs had to fight our way to participate However, with challenges as information

could be circulated selectively Experience of CSOs in policy was another

internal challenge Citizens were consulted through “helicopter”.

Page 5: Malawi presentation4

5

Transition from PRSP to MGDS

In between was the MEGS Only Govt and Private sector developed policy Focused on enhancing pillar 1 of PRSP No citizen participation MEGS had nothing on the social aspects of

society like health, education etc But had linkages to trade, therefore no voice of

CSOs on those trade issues

Page 6: Malawi presentation4

6

The MGDS

MGDS is an amalgamation of the MPRS and the MEGS

Based on Vision 2020 which emphasized on participation by all

MGDS launched in 2007 although document ready in 2006

Formulated through internal consultation within Govt, and interaction between TWG and MPRS Review Team

Page 7: Malawi presentation4

7

MGDS and Right To Development

Civil society participation was lower in the MGDS compared to the MPRS

Government unilaterally came up with the background document for MGDS formulation

Lesser number of thematic working groups structurally limited participation not only by the civil society

Time allocated for formulation was restricted Political directives deciding on the 6 key priorities

metal-jacketed stakeholders thinking more so for a civil service that is reluctant to question political orders

Page 8: Malawi presentation4

8

Role of CSOs in the PRGF

Poverty Reduction and Growth Facility (PRGF) influential on national policy

Right to development in Malawi was, arguably, under the automation of key institutions like the IMF

PRGF contained conditionality for Malawi’s debt relief among other objectives

Contained advise on expenditure ceilings, wage ceilings, recruitment, and pension revisions etc.

PRGF resonated the 23 trigger points that had to be satisfied for debt relief

Page 9: Malawi presentation4

9

PRGF and Right To Development

Citizen and civil society participation almost no existent in the PRGF

PRGF designed in Washington boardrooms and agreed with a handful technocrats in Government to be handed down to the people (Policy Dictatorship?)

Yet the PRGF was influential in deriving resource envelopes and expenditure allocations

Malawians were “being shaved in their absence” This is similar to some trade agreements

Page 10: Malawi presentation4

10

CSOs in Trade Policy

Trade Policies linked to Malawi Foreign Policy which entails promotion of trade interests

Foreign Policy developed without integrating the voices of the people

Min. of Foreign Affairs has no clear guidelines for citizens participation in its processes

Page 11: Malawi presentation4

11

CSOs in Unilateral, Regional, and Trade Arrangements

Malawi’s policy thrust is trade liberalization Malawi’s trade liberalized unilaterally through SAPs

over the years CSOs largely absent in policy decision making

processes related to liberalization Liberalization agenda has been externally driven Poorest and small holders have been harmed (MEJN

Study)

Page 12: Malawi presentation4

12

CSOs in Bilateral Trade Agreements

Malawi has had biggest number of bilateral agreements in SADC

However, these agreements lack the important voices of the citizens and majority CSOs

The executive arm of Govt. is supreme over other players, with private sector being a favorite

Page 13: Malawi presentation4

13

Role of CSOs in SADC and COMESA Debate

CSOs voices need to be integrated CSOs can provide alternative angles from

analytical perspectives However, Malawi needs to make a choice

between SADC and COMESA The search for answers on the best options

needs citizens and CSOs

Page 14: Malawi presentation4

14

Key CSO Challenges

-lack of analytical skills and competencies within CSOs -trade policy regarded as too technical -inadequate access to information on trade policy -ideological variances between private sector and CSOs on trade

regime options, e.g. liberalisation vs. state interventionist approaches

-citizens more interested in issues related to petty trading or mere vending (micro-level) than the bigger issues of policy

-external influences on trade policy aligns Malawi government away from CSOs and more to multilateral institutions

Page 15: Malawi presentation4

15

Key Demands (Recommendations) on the Right To Development

Improvements in societal participation in national development policies are prerequisite to the full attainment of people’s right to development. These improvements can be influenced by all groups of actors in Malawi including the Government, donors, and civil society.

Page 16: Malawi presentation4

16

Demands/Recommendations

Promoting participatory structures instead of torpedoing them: This involves providing lasting forms of civil society and citizen participation support beyond the formulation of national policies.

Integrating civil society in dialogue structures created for donors and the Malawi government

Malawi Parliament should be recognized as an integral player in the national development policy processes, and should therefore be strengthened as well as increase its interaction with civil society.

Page 17: Malawi presentation4

17

Demands/Recommendations

Societal participation should be strengthened in development policy reviews and production of periodic reports.

More attention should be given to the establishment of legal frameworks for civic participation in national policies. Effective participation requires more than just constitutionally guaranteed basic rights. Civil society in Malawi should be supported with establishment of Access to information Laws.

Strengthening the legitimacy of the participatory processes by emphasizing the importance of core principles like country ownership, involvement of elected institutions, and the strengthening of civil society networks.

Page 18: Malawi presentation4

18

Demands/Recommendations

Weak and marginalized sections of the poor Malawian population need to have a say in national development policy processes.

Strengthening the ability of the civil society to act: All donors are called upon to state how strongly they intend to support the capacities of civil society in the long run. This issue needs in-depth discussion and urgent attention as it is illusory to think that civil society in Malawi will be able to deal with complex macroeconomic and macro policy issues for national development without additional resourcing.

Page 19: Malawi presentation4

19

Trade Related Recommendations

-collecting and use of evidence for meaningful participation in trade policy dialogue and negotiations

-analysing trade policy towards pro-poor regimes -advocating govt. and donors for people-centred trade policy -need for more CSO space in actual formulation based on

experiences in PRSP, and MGDS. -access to information legislation for CSO access to trade

information -popularising, dissemination of trade policy information to citizens

as a way of demystifying trade from being regarded as a “technocrats only” area

-

Page 20: Malawi presentation4

20

Recommendations

strengthening CSO networking on trade (learn from EPA collaborations where MEJN, MCC, CISANET, Oxfam, Action Aid, and others walked together)

-prioritise citizen participation and action on trade policies through the strengthening of trade weather stations and other community based networks.

-campaign for the need of strong capacity within Malawi Ministry of Trade towards enhanced negotiating capacity,

-Enhance the role of Ministry of Foreign Affairs in trade diplomacy through realistic steps towards career diplomacy with emphasis on trade and related development oriented international relations

Page 21: Malawi presentation4

21

As a matter of urgency!

Special and urgent recommendation: Any efforts for attaining the right to development for Malawians largely depend on the governance environment. Free and fair elections are a critical component of governance. Malawi civil society therefore urgently and desperately requires funding for conducting electoral related interventions for the fast approaching 2009 General Elections. Civil society work on elections needs to start now and not in 2009!