making the entire firm agile (& lean) - stevedenning · “maybe you mean the balanced...
TRANSCRIPT
Making
The Entire Firm
Agile (& Lean)
Steve Denning
Steve’s daily blog on Forbes
http://blogs.forbes.com/stevedenning/
President, Ford Motor Company, 1960
Secretary of Defence, 1961-1968
President, World Bank, 1968-1981
Robert McNamara
“the smartest man I ever met”
John F. Kennedy
1978
1996: A knowledge
management
program was launched
1996-2000
2000: The World Bank
was benchmarked as a
leading knowledge
organizations
2000-2008 Teaching the Fortune 500
how to use
the power of
leadership storytelling Why
doesn’t it stick?
Why don’t
management
innovations stick?
(These are highly intelligent, educated people!)
In 2008, I began exploring:
Three principles
• The principle of disruptive innovation
• The principle of maximizing shareholder value
• The principle of customer delight
Good news and bad news
Quality
Time
X
Low quality
competitor
High profitability
Larger market
Why didn’t the incumbent respond?
“Low quality!” “Not serious!”
“Not our core customers!” “It’s low profitability”
1. The principle of disruptive innovation
Graph based on Clayton Christensen
Quality
Time
X
Low quality
competitor
High profitability
Larger market
1. The principle of disruptive innovation
• Oracle disrupted Cullinet
• Microsoft disrupted IBM
• DEC disrupted mainframes
• PCs disrupted DEC
• Laptops/tables disrupted PCs
• Mobile phones are disrupting laptops/PCs
• The Cloud is disrupting software
Quality
Time
X
Low quality
competitor
High profitability
Larger market
1. The principle of disruptive innovation
• Toyota disrupted General Motors
• Sony transistors disrupted RCA television
• Mini-steel mills disrupted integrated steel mills
• Digital cameras disrupted Kodak
• ASUSTek disrupted Dell
• Industry after industry: …
Always the
same unhappy
ending
1. The principle of disruptive innovation
Quality
Time
X
Disruptor
High profitability
Larger market
Why didn’t the incumbent respond?
“Not our core customers!”
“It’s low profitability”
The firm is acting rationally!
A very boring story!
Definition of insanity: doing the same thing over and over while expecting a different
result
There is a deeper reason why
in every case the firm didn’t
respond!
2. The principle of maximizing shareholder value
“The object of a firm is to
maximize shareholder value
i.e. make money”
• 1976: Mecklin & Jensen: “The theory of a firm”
• Most management textbooks & business schools
• Consulting firms
• Pervasive in the Fortune 500
And conferences like this!
Five interlocking & self-reinforcing elements
“Single fix” improvements don’t “stick”
Managers are controllers
of indivduals
Bureaucracy: rules, plans, reports
Top down commands
Efficiency, cost cutting
Make money for
shareholders
1. The purpose of a firm is to
produce outputs that make money
Five planks of traditional management
Make money for
shareholders
Goal 2. The principle of maximizing shareholder value
The elements are interlocking
Managers are controllers
of indivduals
Bureaucracy: rules, plans, reports
Top down commands
Efficiency, cost cutting
Role
Coordination Values
Communications
It kills innovation
Traditional management
systematically kills
disruptive innovation
2. The principle of maximizing shareholder value
Even successful innovation initiatives don’t last
Managers are controllers
of indivduals
Bureaucracy: rules, plans, reports
Top down commands
Efficiency, cost cutting
R & D Department
Make money for
shareholders
Transactions, outputs 2. The principle of maximizing shareholder value
It kills lean manufacturing
“Only 1% of lean
initiatives meet their
goals.”
Jeffrey Liker
2. The principle of maximizing shareholder value
It kills marketing
25 ways in which traditional
management systematically
kills great marketing ideas
2. The principle of maximizing shareholder value
Within a few years, it had
been put on a back-burner
• BP
• Ernst & Young
• IBM
• HP
• World Bank
It kills knowledge management
2. The principle of maximizing shareholder value
Even the most
successful and
famous KM
initiatives didn’t
last
Traditional management
systematically kills
all the creative things
in organizations
• innovation
• lean manufacturing
• marketing
• knowledge management
• Agile software development
2. The principle of maximizing shareholder value
2009: Conclusive proof of the
failure of traditional management
Deloitte’s Center for the Edge: The Shift Index:
Rate of return on assets and invested capital: US firms: 1965-2011
Declines are reflected in per capita GDP
Traditional management also fails
in employee engagement
Source: Deloitte’s Center for the Edge: The Shift Index
Only 1 in 5
workers is fully
engaged in his
or her work
1. Director of Information Technology
2. Director of Sales and Marketing
3. Product Manager
The Three Most Hated Jobs in the USA
http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2011/08/11/think-your-job-is-bad-try-one-of-these/
Even managers hate their own jobs!
Quality
Time
X
Disruptor
2. The principle of maximizing shareholder value
??? Clayton Christensen’s
graph is incomplete
The conceptual error in principle #2
“Maximizing shareholder value is
the dumbest idea in the world.
Making money for the shareholders
is the result, not the goal.”
Jack Welch, 2009
3. The principle of customer delight
The key to the future
“The only valid purpose of a
firm is to create a customer.”
Peter Drucker, 1973
3. The principle of customer delight
Delighting customers
Goal
From controller to enabler
From bureaucracy to Agile, Scrum, Kanban
From command to conversations
From value to values
Role
Coordination Values
Communications
The elements are interlocking
Transparency
Improvement
Sustainability
3. The principle of customer delight
Customer delight
is not a new idea:
Ancient Romans
e.g. Vitruvius’s treatise on
architecture
1. NEW GOAL: delight the customers
from outputs to outcomes 1
Is “customer delight” a serious business proposition?
“Customer delight” = “Providing a continuous
stream of additional
value to customers and
delivering it sooner”
3. The principle of customer delight
Is “customer delight” a serious business proposition?
“joy” “enchantment” “happiness” “raving fans”
3. The principle of customer delight
Is “customer delight” a serious business proposition?
• Perfectly perform
the job that the
customer wants
performed
3. The principle of customer delight
Is “customer delight” a serious business proposition?
• “customer success”
• “customer trust in us”
• Net Promoter Score
3. The principle of customer delight
1. NEW GOAL: delight the customers
i.e. from outputs to outcomes 1
The goal is: delighting the customer
• “Making money” is not the goal
• “Being agile” is not the goal.
• “Working software” is not the goal.
• “Motivated staff” is not the goal
• “Satisfying the stakeholders” is not the goal
• “Flow” is not the goal
• All these are means to achieving the goal.
• Everyone must focus on the goal
1. NEW GOAL: delight the customers
i.e. from outputs to outcomes 1
“Maybe you mean the balanced scorecard?”
Delight the
customer
Motivate the
employees
Make money for
firm
Protect the
environment
Improve product quality
Be a good citizen
“Surely, a firm has many goals?”
1. NEW GOAL: delight the customers
i.e. from outputs to outcomes 1
“Everyone must understand the bottom line”
Delight the
customer
Motivate the
employees
Make money for
firm
Protect the
environment
Improve product quality
Satisfy all the
stakeholders
“No! The firm has only one goal!”
These are means to achieving the goal
The new bottom line
21st Century 4 buttons
Simple
Easy to use
iPod
LESS
IS
MORE!
20th Century 54 buttons
Complicated
DVD
controller
1. NEW GOAL: delight the customers
i.e. from outputs to outcomes 1
Aim for the simplest thing!
1. NEW GOAL: delight the customers
i.e. from outputs to outcomes 1
Deliver it sooner !
In a bureaucracy,
large amounts of
work wait in
queues
1. NEW GOAL: delight the customers
i.e. from outputs to outcomes 1
Is “customer delight” a serious business proposition?
“Customer delight”
is
measurable.
48
1. NEW GOAL: delight the customers
i.e. from outputs to outcomes 1
Is “customer delight” a serious business proposition?
49
Net promoter score =
% (Promoters – detractors)
Detractors Promoters
F. Reichheld:
The Ultimate Question 2.0
page 63
1. NEW GOAL: delight the customers
1 Philips Electronics
Philips NPS
x Average NPS
for sector
100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% -20% -40% -60% -80% -100%
x x
x
x
x x
Where Philips is lagging
Where Philips is “average”
Where Philips is “relatively strong”
Range for
the sector
F. Reichheld:
The Ultimate Question 2.0
page 63
1. NEW GOAL: delight the customers
1 Philips Electronics
Philips NPS
x Average NPS
for sector
100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% -20% -40% -60% -80% -100%
x x
x
x
x x
Where Philips is lagging
Where Philips is “average”
Where Philips is “relatively strong”
Range for
the sector
Philips is not generally
delighting its customers
F. Reichheld:
The Ultimate Question 2.0
1. NEW GOAL: delight the customers
1 Philips Electronics
Philips NPS
x Average NPS
for sector
100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% -20% -40% -60% -80% -100%
x x
x
x
x x
Where Philips is lagging
Where Philips is “average”
Where Philips is “relatively strong”
The firms that are the absolute best”
Apple
USAA
Range for
the sector
Absolute leaders
in NPS
x
x
The best firms have NPS
around 90%
F. Reichheld:
The Ultimate Question 2.0
1. NEW GOAL: delight the customers
1 Philips Electronics
Philips NPS
x Average NPS
for sector
100% 80% 60% 40% 20% 0% -20% -40% -60% -80% -100%
x x
x
x
x x
Where Philips is lagging
Where Philips is “average”
Where Philips is “relatively strong”
The firms that are the absolute best”
Apple
USAA
Range for
the sector
Absolute leaders
in NPS
x
x
The task ahead for Philips
Customer delight Costs come down of
their own accord!
A paradoxical discovery!
1. NEW GOAL: delight the customers
i.e. from outputs to outcomes 1
1. New goal: “Delighting the customer” means ….
a different way of running the organization.
2. New role for managers
3. New coordination mechanisms
4. Shift from value to values
5. New way to communicate
1. NEW GOAL: delight the customers
i.e. from outputs to outcomes 1
2. NEW MANAGER ROLE: from controller to enabler 2
Controller of
individuals Enabler of self-
organizing teams
2. NEW MANAGER ROLE: from controller to enabler 2
Self-organizing teams
are a very old idea
Legal juries in England, 1166
A diverse group of citizens
was preferred over decision
by one or more “experts”
2. NEW MANAGER ROLE: from controller to enabler 2
The Difference: How the Power of Diversity Creates Better
Groups, Firms, Schools, and Societies by Scott E. Page
Diversity
defeats
intelligence!
3. COORDINATION OF WORK: Dynamic linking 3
Client
driven
Short
cycles
Bureaucracy:
Internal plans, targets, reports, meetings
Dynamic linking Clear line of sight to customer
Flow
3. COORDINATION OF WORK: Dynamic linking 3
Dynamic linking: work in short cycles—smooth flow
direct customer feedback
the customer is the boss
In software
Lean
Agile
Scrum
Kanban
Even “lumpy” work!
E.g. Toyota
Quadrant Homes
Naval radar system
Polaris submarines
Thousands of organizations
Combines disciplined execution
with team creativity
3. COORDINATION OF WORK: Dynamic linking 3
Progress is measured by direct client feedback
“Most changes make things
worse for the customer”
The case of
the missing
button
68
Get the product out
4. FROM VALUE TO VALUES: continuous improvement 4
The status quo is
never good enough
Individually, none of the shifts is new
WHAT’S NEW: doing all at once
Delight the
customer
From controller to enabler
From bureaucracy to dynamic linking
From command to conversations
Radical transparency
Goal
Role
Coordination Values
Communications
… an organization is at war with itself
Making
money for
shareholders
Top-down
commands
Agile
Lean
Kanban
Without all five shifts ….
From controller
to enabler
From bureaucracy
to dynamic linking Radical
transparency
Role
Values
Communications
“Once you introduce this, it affects
everything in the organization—the
way you plan, the way you manage,
the way you work.
Everything is different.
It changes the game radically.”
Mikkel Harbo
VP, Systematic Software (Denmark)
Delighting customers means systemic change
More than a new set of management tools!
“Implementing radical management
is like learning a new language.” It’s like: • “Up to now, we have spoken English. • From here on, we will speak in, say, δαβƍƢ.”
Why? I hate
it! *&^%*#@!
I’ll never learn it?
Why not stick to
what we know?
Bad idea!
20th Century thinking 21st Century thinking
R U
B I
C O
N
“You take
what we
make!’
“We want
to help solve
your problems!”
20th Century thinking 21st Century thinking
R U
B I
C O
N
Manipulating
things
Interacting
with people
20th Century thinking 21st Century thinking
R U
B I
C O
N Make money
off the
customers
Add value
to the
customers
20th Century thinking 21st Century thinking
R U
B I
C O
N “Making
money is
the goal”
“Making
money is
the result”
“A sense of urgency”
“Shared value”
20th Century thinking 21st Century thinking “Partial fixes” “New paradigm”
“New ecosystem”
R U
B I
C O
N Delight
the customer
From controller to enabler
From bureaucracy to dynamic linking
From command to
conversations
Radical transparen
cy
Goal
Role
Coordination Values
Communications
The transition is inevitable
Two- to four-times
gains in
productivity
Economics will drive the change!
It won’t happen easily
Lean Manufacturing
The world’s best plant
Ford’s Hermosillo plant
in Mexico
1990s: Ford’s Romeo plant
in Michigan
2006: The new CEO,
Allan Mullaly, embraces it
Firms may prefer to die than to change
“A new scientific truth does not
triumph by convincing its
opponents and making them see
the light, but rather because its
opponents eventually die, and a
new generation grows up that is
familiar with it.”
Nobel laureate Max Planck
Lead the revolution!
• Be the strategy (not support the strategy)
• Master leadership storytelling
• Educate your bosses: what management is about
• Join with others
• Take charge of your future
The opportunity for Scrum and Agile
“Your time is limited: don’t waste it living someone else’s life.”
Steve Jobs
The real voyage of
discovery consists not in
seeking new landscapes,
but in having new eyes.
Marcel Proust
Webinar with Joe Justice, CEO of Wikispeed
A 100 mpg gallon car developed in 3 months • No resources • No manufacturing experience
Webinar: Don't miss "Making Your Organization Agile" a monthly mashup with Peter Stevens and Joe Justice, CEO of Wikispeed on Thursday May 17 at noon ET. Register at http://t.co/o1iPOKQ4