42FK3NWM*5 2.6242 FOCH LAKE O1O

MAGNETOMETER AND GEOCHEMICAL SURVEYS

SPIKE LAKE PROPERTY

KABAMICHIGAMA LAKE AREA

THUNDER BAY MINING DIVISION

RECEIVEDm 41984

MINING LANDS ScCTJOM

The property consists of 10 claims, namely;

TB489144-48 incl., TB489150-51 incl., TB489153-54 incl.,

TB489159. The claims were staked in September, 1978 by Robert

Fairservice on behalf of John Stinson of New Westminister, B.C.

The property has recently been acquired by Donald Mcwilliams

of Vancouver, B. C.

LOCATION AND ACCESS

The Spike Lake property is located 41 miles north

east of Nipigon, by road. One goes 14 miles east of Nipigon

along highway 17, then 27 miles northeast along the Domtar Ltd.

logging road. The property is bisected by this road and some

logging has been done on the claims.

-2-

HISTORY

The mineralization was discovered during road-

building operations in late July, 1967. It was staked By several

members of the road crew; the principal one being the bulldozer

operator and part-time prospector, Nolan Cox.

The claims were acquired by Anglo American Nickel

Mining Corporation, who, during June and July of 1968, carried

out EM and Magnetometer surveys and put down 8 diamond drill

holes for a total of approximately 3,300 feet.

GEOLOGY AND MINERALIZATION

The property is underlain by light gray granite

and granite gneiss with remnant sedimentary bands striking

northeasterly and dipping almost vertically. A major fault

crosses the area in a northwest - southeast direction, A diabase

dike crosses the property southwest of and parallel to the fault,

The mineralization consists of chalcopyrite

associated with pyrite and a little bornite, and has a known

strike length of 800 feet. It occurs in brecciated granite and

sedimentary gneiss with abundant quartz vein filling,This min

eralized zone occurs on the southwest side of the fault and

parallels same. No mineralization has been found on the north

east side of the fault.

-3-

The mineralized zone is up to 1.0 feet wide at the

surface. The drill results seem to indicate that this zone widens

at depth, but, this is far from certain. The zone strikes north

west - southeast and dips steeply to the northeast; as estab

lished by geologists. 7 of the 8 holes were set up on the south-

west side of the zone and drilled at an angle of 45 degrees to

the northeast, In effect, these 7 holes were drilled down dip,

and the encouraging widths of copper mineralization could be mis

leading. The lone hole drilled from the northeast side of the

zone towards the southwest did not encounter any copper.

When a diamond drill intersects an ore zone at a

steep angle, it tends to follow the zone down. I believe that

this is actually what happened. Even if the drill had passed

through the zone without deviating, the steep angle of the in

tersection would have given a mineralized core length of sev-

al times the true width.

It would seem desirable to test this hypothesis by

drilling at least one hole from the northeast side of the zone.

This hole could be located between the ore zone and the iault -

there is ample room - and drilled at an angle of 45 degrees

to the southwest.

-4-

PRESENT WORK

A grid of approximately 10.6 miles was put in on

8 claims, namely; TB489144-48 incl., RB489150-51 incl., TB489159.

A Proton Magnetometer survey was performed over the entire grid.

A Soil Sampling survey was carried out over only part of it.

This geochemical program was of limited scope, due to the fact

that much of the property is underlain by swamp. However, one

important part of the property - the hoped for northwest extension

of the ore zone along strike - was high and dry and was there

fore v.ery thoroughly tested.

The grid was confined to only 8 claims, as, due

to time and approaching winter weather limitations, it was

considered advisable to concentrate the work on the area of

known mineralization and its possible extension along strike.

The base line was run at 320 degrees and had the

same 0+00 point as the 1968 grid. No sign was seen of this

older grid, except the aforementioned 0+00 point. Although

the former base line supposedly had the same compass bearing

as the present line, it seems from the map that its actual

direction was 330 degrees.

As indicated on the map, the grid does not con

form perfectly to the outline of the claims; some of the lines

extend beyond the claim boundaries. This was done to give con

tinuity to any interesting features that may have appeared on

the magnetometer survey.

-5-

These surveys and grid work were performed from Oct. 5, 1983

to Nov. 14, 1983, incl. All work was done by H. T. Nelson.

MAGNETOMETER SURVEY

Although a magnetometer survey, using a portable

fluxgate, had been done on this property during 1968, it was

deemed advisable to redo the area with a proton precession mag

netometer. It was hoped that this instrument, being so much more

sensitive and precise than a portable fluxgate, might detect

some subtle features of the ore zone that had escaped the ear

lier survey.

However, no such luck attended the present survey.

In fact, the whole map, with the exception of the diabase dike,

is remarkably flat and uninteresting. No reaction was noticed

over the known ore zone, nor over the fault.

A strong response, up to 1,000 gammas, was obtained

over a diabase dike about 500 feet southwest of and parallel

to the base line. This dike has been trenched where it crosses

lines 2+00 SE and 3+00 SE at 500 feet SW. Samples of this dia

base were also picked up on other lines to the northwest.

A Geometrics Model G-826 portable proton magnet

ometer was employed for this survey. This instrument is accurate

-6-

to plus or minus one gamma, when used with a base station em

ploying a recorder. As a recorder was not available, a base

station was established at 0+00 on the base line. This base

was read frequently during the survey; at least once per hour.

Good luck attended the survey in that the diurnal variations

were minimal during the two days of the survey. The corrected

results are plotted on the accompanying map.

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY

A program of soil sampling, at 50 foot intervals,

was carried out over the known ore zone and its hoped for ex

tension to the northwest. 50 foot intervals were selected to

give optimum coverage, as the surface showings are so narrow.

The lines were sampled to only 500 feet to the southwest; again

because the zone is so narrow and no mineralization has been

found southwest of the 500 foot area. The swamp, which parallels

the base line on the northeast and crosses the base line at 4+50

SE, prevented sampling of these areas.

Samples were taken from the B horizon, where

possible. At many stations there was very poor soil development,

while at others only fragmented rock. Some stations produced

no soil at all for one of two reasons - outcrop of bare rocks

or deep swamp. A large mattock was used to collect the samples.

A total of 270 samples were taken and assayed.

-7-

Most of the samples were obtained less that l foot

below the surface, but some were as much as 30 inches deep. A

4 foot auger was tried in the swamp, but it proved useless as

the swamp is deep black mud mixed with large rocks.

The geochemical results, as plotted on the accom

panying map, are very disappointing. No copper was detected out

side the known ares of mineralization. Even over the known

zone, the results were very low; a maximum of 40 ppm. This

could mean that the chemical conditions of the soil are such

that transportation and retention of copper in the soil is in

hibited in some way. A more likely explanation is that, except

for the known mineralization, there is no copper in the area.

A few relatively anamalous results were obtained

over the diabase dike, which crosses the propery at 5+00 SW on

all the lines. This was not unexpected, as it was known from

assays that this dike carries traces of copper at some places.

23 ppm of copper was recorded at 4+00 NE on line

0. This sample was taken near the road and was probably con

taminated with material from the ore zone and which was used

for a road base in the swamp.Sometimes, road material gets

quite widely spread by the bulldozer, and I feel sure that

this is the reason for this higher than normal reading.

All in all, the low geochemical values do not

bode well for the property.

r

BIBLIOGRAPHY

( l ) Oja, R. V. "Geophysical Surveys of Anglo Amer.

. Nickel Mining Corp., Kabamichigama Lake Area,M

Port Arthur Mining Division, July 3, 1968.

K ( 2 ) Phendler, R. W. Feasibility Study, Spike lake

Property " July, 1979.

( 3 ) The Northern Miner June 13, 1968

June 27, 1968

July 18, 1968

August 15, 1968

A*V. .rAJ-

Central Standard I Eastern --

Tim* -Standard # ,. .. .' Tim* '1,'Colliw, ' ArmstroniStition

- ISLE ROYALE

NATIONAL PARK

, MICWWCOTtHl,

*^l ' ' 'i ^ * JV' L*ugning rimn

^^^Nfg^^^^wtt^ p^-..., *rts3z!ZF"*"#*—-rL .^.W-X

2 aj.^lF* M XiKtOOT 1-2 "' Suabmr ^4 miw 14

BARRINGER MAGENTA LIMITED

304 CARLINGVIEW DRIVE METROPOLITAN TORONTO REXDALE, ONTARIO CANADA M9W 5G2 PHONE . 41 6-675-3870 TELEX: 06-989183

SERVICES FOR THE EARTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES

Mr. Tom Nelson, 1402-4 St.N.W. CALGARY, Alberta T2M 2Y9

TERMS: NET 30 d ay S

DATE: November 30, 1983PROJECT: 104. 51

PERIOD COVERED:

SALES ORDER:

PROGRESS BILLING:

SHIPPING REPORT:

WORK REPORT: 8 3 - 5 4 9 6

FED. SALES TAX: CXCmpt

ONT. SALES TAX: exempt

AUTHORITY: T. Ne l S Oil

TO:

Project: President Mines

FOR:

270 Copper analyses iji soil

270 Soil sample preparation

Total invoice

2.30

.65

Payment received with thanks

621.00

175.50

796.50

INVOICE N9 9520

\TBARRINGERfTOM NELSON

ID

LO-3iOONE LO-4+50NE LO-5-t-OONE

LO-7+OOHE

LO-8+OONE LO-9400NE LO-lOrOONE LO-2rOOSy LO-2f50Sy

LO-3yOOSy LO-3r50Sy LO-4-fOOSy LO-4r50SyLo-stoosyLl-SE-OrSOSy Ll-SE-HOOSyLi-SE-nsosyLl-SE-2-fOOSy Ll-SE-3+SOSy

Ll-SE-4+OOSy Ll-SE-4t50Sy Ll-SE-5+OOSy L2-SE-0450Sy L2-SE-HOOSy

L2-SE-1450Sy L2-SE-2400Sy L2-SE-2450Sy L2-SE-3fOOSy L2-SE-3450Sy

L2-SE-4400Sy L2-SE-4450Sy L2-SE-5tOOSy L3-SE-0450Sy L3-SE-HQOSy

L3-SE-1450Sy L3-SE-2450Sy L3-SE-3fOOSy L3-SE-3450Sy L3-SE-4IOOSy

L3-SE-4450Sy L3-SE-5rOOSy BL-3+OOSE BL-4400SE BL-0-O+SONy

V

\TBARRINGERr TOM NELSON

If ' " '

L6|gH3*OOTO

L6-NW-4t50Sy L6-MW-5MOSy

L7-Ny-Of50NE L7-Ny-(H50SyLT-NU-itoow-L7*Ny-lf508U

L7-Ny-2r50Sy L7-Ny-3rOOSy L7-Ny-3r50Sy L7-Ny-4400Sy

L8-NH-0+50NELS-Ny-o+sosy L8-Ny-n-oosyL8-Hy-145QSy L8-Ny-2fOOSy

L8-Ny-2450SyL8-Ny-3foosy LS-Ny-3+sosyL8-Ny~4r50Sy L8-Ny-5400Sy

L9-Ny-0*50SyL9-Ny-Hoosy L9-Ny-n-50syL9-Ny-2rOOSy L9-Ny-2450Sy

L9-wy-340osyL9-Ny-3t50SyL9-Ny-4toosyL9-Ny-4450SyL9-Ny-stoosyL10NW-0T50SyLioNy-i+oosy LioNy-i+sosyL10Ny-2rOOSyLioNy-2+sosyLlONy-3+OOSULioNy-3+sosy LioNy-4-rOosyL10Ny-4t50SyLioNy-s+oosy

MAGENTA

BMLC REF 83-5496

cu

9 30

6 5

23

7 3 5

7

118

10 10 14

24 15 40 10

7

9 14 19 10 25

11 11H 9 8

20 7

24 5

8 9

1911

9

6 23 22

9 8

MAGENTA

BMLC REF 83-5496

fmZ ' 5 4 3 7

6 6 6 6 5

7 4

10 4 6

5 5 4 6 3

5 8 4 5 4

5 3 4 57

67 5 2 3

4 6 4 4 8

6 6 67 8

304 CARLINGVIEW DRIVE 3750 - 1 8TH STREET REXDALE. ONTARIO SUITE 105 M8W 5G2 CALGARY, ALBERTA

T2E6V2 (416) 675-3870 (403) 276-9701

s*mE mm PPHBL-O-l+OO** Sic-o-i*iii id

BL-0-3f50Ny 3 K.-O-4+OONy 2 BL-0-6TOONW 3 BL-0-6i50Ny 8 BL-0-7TOONy 4

BL-O-8+OONy 7 BL-0-8l50Ny 6 BL-0-10iOONy 4 BL-O-lHOONy 4 BL-O-12-JOONy 5

BL-O-13+OONy 4 BL-0-13t50Ny 4 BL-O-14+OONy 8 BL-O-15-fOONy 6

BL-0-15i50Ny 4 BL-0-16rOONy 5 BL-O-16+SONy 5 BL-O-17+OONy 5 BL-0-17450Ny 4

BL-0-19iOONy 5 BL-O-20-IOONy 7 Ll-Ny-0450NE 11 L1-NW-3450NE 14 Ll-NW-4fOONE 9

Ll-Ny-4r50NE 10 L1--NW-5400NE 6 L1-NU-6400NE 10 Ll-Ny-7400NE 6 Ll-Ny-8+OONE 3

Ll-NW-O+SOSU 13Li-Ny-iwsy 4Ll-Ny-lf50Sy 9 Ll-Ny-2400Sy 6Li-Ny-2+gosy 6Ll-Ny-3fOOSU 5 Ll-Ny-3450Sy 5Li-Ny-4+oosy 4Ll-NU-4r50Sy 11 Ll-Ny-5+OOSy 19

304 CARLINQVIEW DRIVE 3750 - 19TH STREET REXDALE, ONTARIO SUITE 105 M9W 5G2 CALGARY, ALBERTA

T2E 6V2 (416) 675-3870 (403) 276-9701

1 ' '- - SJMPt^ " ""' ; f ~': ' -- ^SW-' ' :

'-. ; - '^ -..'. : ^ .-.." E li i V ' * . '^ ' ' \ ' '

LllfliiZlW^i 6

LI lNM-2T50Sy 8 LllNy-3fOOSy 8 LllNy-3f50SU 4 LllNy-4rOOSy 5 L11NU-4T50SW 3

LllNy-5400Sy 12 L12NW-Or50Sy 2 L12Ny-HOOSy 6 L12Ny-lrroOSy 6Li2ny-2ioosy 7L12Ny--2f50Sy 3Li2Ny-3toosy 4L12Ny-3r50Sy 3 L12Ny-4rOOSy 4 Ll2Ny-4150Sy 4

L12Ny-5rOOSy 18 L13Ny-Oi50NE 5 L13Ny-Or50Sy 2 LlSNW-H-OOSy 3 L13Ny-lf50Sy 4

L13Ny-2rOOSy 5 L13Ny-2l50Sy 3 L13Ny-3400Sy 4 L13Ny-3l50Sy 4 L13NU-4+OOSU 4

L13Ny-4*50Sy 6 L13Ny-'JTOOSy 6 L14Ny-Or50NE 2 L14NH-OI50Sy 4Li4Ny-noosy 3L14Ny-1450Sy 6 L14Ny-2400Sy 5 L14NH-2r50Sy 4 L14Ny-3rOOSy 5 L14Ny-4FOOSy 3

L14NW-4450Sy 8 L14Ny-5400Sy 6 L151W-0450NE 4 L15Ny-0T50SW 8 L15Ny-1400Sy 6

f FILEl t3-0818 mm 63/42/83MATRIX: N03/CW4

WO NO: 83-0818

SAMPLE IB

LZ~m- 0+56H?

L2 -Nil- iwjp-

L2-Ny-3toosyL2-Ny-4460SU L3-Hy OI50NEL3- wy -o+sosy L3-Ny-uoosyL3-NW-H50Sy L3-Ny-2f60Sy L3-Ny-2450Sy L3-Ny-3406Sy L3-Ny-3450Sy

L3-Ny-4toosyL3-Ny-5406Sy L4-Ny-0456NE L4-Ny-0450Sy

L4-Ny-HOOSy L4-Ny-1450SyL4-Ny-2-ioosyL4-NW-2f50Sy L4-Ny-3iOOSy

L4-Ny-3450SyL4-Ny-4toosyL4-Ny-4456Sy L4-Ny-5IOOSH L5-Ny-0450NE

L5-NM-0450SyL5-Ny-iiOosyL5-NU-1450Sy L5-Ny-2hOOSy L5-Ny--2450Sy

L5-Ny-3450Sy L5--Ny -4400Sy L5-Ny-4f50SW LS-NV-SIOOSy L6-Ny-0450NE

L6-NH-(H5QSyL6-Ny-itoosyL6-NW-H50SW L6-NU-2IOOSW L6-KV-2iSOSy

y ''-^ ' ''V" :: " F::: ; ':'T:'""; " ' - -:-:.- : ' - ^ -- ^••':-J.^.: : ' - -. : : ' - -. . . : - ' .

MO NO: 83-0818

SWUiE

L15NH-4TOOSW

L15NW-5IOOSy LUNy-llOONE L16Ny-0450SyLuny-noosy

L16Ny-2IOOSW L16Ny-2456Sy L16Ny-3iOOSy L16NH -3+SOSy

L16Ny-4400Sy L16NH-4i50Sy L16Ny-5400Sy L17Ny-0450SyLi7Ny-noosyL17Ny-1450Sy L17Ny-2400Sy L17Ny-2l50Sy L17Ny-3frOOSy L17NV-3450Sy

L17Ny-4fOOSy

L18Ny-Of50NELiBNy-n-oosyL18NU-H50SU

LlSNH-2+OOSy L18Ny-2l50SyLi8Ny-3ioosyL18Ny-3f50Sy L19NU-Or50SW

L19NU-HOOSULi9Ny-itsosyL19Ny-2400Sy L20NV-0450NE L20NU-Or50SU

L20NU-lrOOSy L20NU-H50SU L20NU-2rOOSy L20Ny-2450Sy L20NV-3400Sy

PAGE: ^ ^cu

PPM

27

4 5 3

6 6

14 6 5

8 12 6 6 9

7 6 8 4 2

3 7 8 6 6

5 7 5 4 3

4 7 3 5 6

20 5 5

10 4

4 6 3 7 6

- ~~ - "

PAGE: 2 jcu ^

PPH

4 4 3 4 7

11 6 3

5

4 2 3 3 3

4 7

18 4 3

2 6 3 3

18

9 13 3 6 6

4 10 8 6 2

4 5 34^ ^

7 6 5 4 4

/.IIAV; . - KX-* ..i , Grontte .' Lain;!

Central ' ut** "! v Standard ' Eastern -*

Time -Standard .^ . . ," Time -5 Colljns- s/rmilroni Slition,

AMin.illr ^ J"rflow. PlsSpi,

;Thunder Ai., P™, P,Bay -i?62M

ISLE ROYALE NATIONAL PARK

Negaune^••aaa^M

Ishpem5^— "a ar" iiSCL. i" U'cr'* - -^H5r u — " ss*OT CO T

M lit wzrc, M ssr

TMutlon H4 WMi'Mld5***t MM* M nundvbr (M -- - -SMMUH C? T*tMM* M— —— ^.5 TBMI M

M TrWfllMl K 4

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

Report of Work

(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

The42F03NW0ee5 2.6242 FOCH LAKE 900

not use snauea areas uetow.Type of Survey (s)

Claim Hoider(s)e T 4' - So,/ K 3 D 3 At i C, k /^ 3. Af * X.Q/^-

Me,Prospectors Licence No.

tf t/ LAddress

/oo - S1 T. .(L- i/ J L 3 c. t,Date of Survey (from * to

~ /G "- '

Survey Company

T. OaV

b tol ^y y,.//. Pi , /*J oti\ i 7 H * ' iy l Mo. j Yr. | Day | Mo. | Yr.

Total Miles of line Cut

M.Name and Address of Author (of Goo-Technical report)

y. T- *J*ls*^ I /rt- ST-eri(

r 2Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

i/0

2QDays per

Claim

^

XDays per Claim

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Type of Work Performed

4 s* 3.//4/C, go l f S a. ^Performed on C*aim(s)u

T g, v rf i ^4 - rg y f 5 /fi//^^

T& If li f* - rk ffi '/SI - rk W/tfCalculation of Expenditure Days Credits lis"^***—:fc- ;T - -~-~--

Total Total Expenditures Days Credits

S 7f^.J^ -H 15 *; S3Instructions

Total Days Credits may ba apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Date

. 3, ttRecorded Holder or Agent (Signature)X-J

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Total number of mining claims covered by This report of work.

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

Date Certified Certified by (Signature

1362 (81/9)

Ministry*Natural Resources

Ontario

Geotechnicalo,,.^..* RePOrt Approval

Pila

Mining Lands Comments

For Geophysics

Comments

Wish to see egain with corrections

D To: Geology - ExpendituresComment*

\\ Approved |~| Wish to tee egain with correctionsSignature

: Geochemistry^^

[~1 Wish to see again with corrections

j JTo: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)

1693 (81/10)

r-Assessed

Approved Reports of Work sent out

Notice of Intent filed

Approval after Notice of Intent sent out

Duplicate sent to Resident Geologist

Duplicate sent to A.F.R.O.

/.

rOntario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

OFFICE USE ONLY

Type of Sui Township o Claim Hold

Survey Con Author of 1 Address of Covering D;

Total Miles

SPECIAL

•vey(s)r Area

er(s)1OO-

ipanyH T

leport

Author 1

ites of Surv

of Line Cut

Portable Proton Magnetometer

Kabami p.h i gama T.ake Area

Don a 1 ri Mr, W i "Mi ams7P55 Sixth St. New Westminister

Wo-l^n B - C ' V3L 3C6

TT f N^^gnrj

4n9.-4.thRt T̂W Pnlcrary T9.M 9VQ

ey Oc't R tn Nov 14 1 flRS .(linecutting to office)

1 O , fi

. PROVISIONS HAVSCREDITS REQUESTED ^u,,.;,-, P-*"-

ENTER 40 days (inc line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for i additional survey usii same grid.

AIRBORNI Magnetome

HATF- D

Res. Geol.

—Electromagnetic ——————— ludes 4f)

—Magnetometer r.—RflHinmet"''

*or-h — Other

^K Geologicalr.~w.hmi~i

'j CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)

ter F-l^trnmagru'tir Radinmctrir(enter days per claim)

ec. 3, 1983sir.NATTTi!F. "2/-J- LtdLw

Previous SurveysFile No. Type

Author of Report or Agent

Qualifirations , -^. ' ',^ -

Date Qaim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

12*4,89.144.(prefix) (number)

TB489145

TB489146

lB4.a9147.................................TB489148

TB489150

TB489151

TB489159

—J.B4pmc5^——m '4OT

AfflNING LANDS SL^... ;

T^TAI ™ *TMS

If space insufficient, attach lift

837 (5/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS — If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations. Station interval —— Profile scale^—-—-Contour interval.

567

100 feet.Number of Readings JLine spacing_____100

100 eammas

Geometrins Model G - R5fiMAGNETIC

Accuracy — Scale constantPilirn?] rnrrertinn mrthnA

Base Station check-in interval (hours)PaSf Station location and vajue

1 garima

one half hour close

o+on bas^ lin*3 -

lines - 1 hour or less others

5^ 735 crummoc!

l l lw

InstrumentCoil configuration Coil separation —— Accuracy ̂ ^——— Method: Frequency—————

Parameters measured.

d Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back d In line d Parallel line

(specify V.L.F. station)

Instrument.Scale constant.Corrections made.

^ Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

Instrument —————————— Method l l Time Domain l l Frequency Domain

INDUCED POLARIZATIOParanvfrs — Hn time

^ Off timeH^ — n^lay timei— i ' c^rn — Tntpgratinn timei— i B C/3 W PnwprOS

Electrode array

Electrode spacing . ————————————————————

TVDP of electrode ..... —————— . ....— ————

FrequencyRange

1984 05 28 Your Files lOur Pile: 2.6242

Mrs. Audrey HayesMining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay/ OntarioPTC 5G6

Dear Madamt

REt Notice of Intent dated May 10. 1984.

Geophysical (Magnetometer) and Geochemical Survey and Data for Assaying on mining claims TB 489144 at al in the area of Kabamichigama Lake.-

The assessment work credits as listed with the above mentioned Notice of Intent, have been approved as of the above date.

Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.

Yours sincerely r

8.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen*s ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phones (416) 965-6918

D. Kinvigssc

ccs Donald Mcffilliams ccs Mr. G.H. FergusonSuite 100 Mining 6 Lands Commissioner765 Sixth Street Toronto* OntarioNew Westminister, B.C.V3L 3C6 ccs Resident Geologist

Thunder Bay, Ontario

© Ministry of Technical A**eJS*l Natural ,.. , - ... Resources Work Credit*

Ontario f~^

m*nt w* X 2.6242

""1984 05 10 WKWr*f FU™ 0'

Recorded Holder DONALD MCWILLIAMSTownship or Area

KABAMICHIGAMA LAKE AREA

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

nth.r davi

Section 77 (19) tee "Mining Claims Anwed" column

Gftological , . - - dayt

Man days O Airborne CD

Special provision Q Ground d

Q Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

d Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Cleimt Aliened

S796.50 spent on assaying samples taken from Mining Claims:

TB 489144 489146 489150-51

53 days credit allowed which may be grouped in accordance with Section 76(6) of the Mining Act.

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining, claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

LJ not sufficiently covered by the survey l — l Insufficient technical data filed

j

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary In order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Qeophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77 (19)—60:828 (83/6)

© Ministry of Natural rV-vjurces

Ontario x

Technical Assessi Work Credit*

™nt Fllt 2.6242bete Mining Rscordjr't-tleport of

1984 05 10 Work*0- T

Recorded Holder DONALD MCWILLIAMSTownship or Area

IsMDi \MICHIGAMA LAKE AREA

Type of survey and number of Assessment deys credit per cleim

Geophysical

Pltrtrnnugnctic

Induced polarization

Othar

Section 77 (19) Sea "Mining

Geological , ,.-

.say.

30.5dam

,- - -days

dam

rUut

Claim* AttatMd" column

dux*

davi

Man days D Airborne D

Special provision Q Ground Q

C3 Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

Q Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant

Mining Claim* A mill J

TB 489144-48 inclusive 489150-51 489159

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

LH not sufficiently covered .by the survey LJ Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary In order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19)—60:828 (83/6)

© Ministry of Technical Aseessi Natural .., , - ... sources Work Credit*

Ontario '

merit F"* 2.6242

5sta Mining Recorder's Report of1984 05 10 w* NO- j

Recorded Holder DONALD MCWILLIAMSTownship or Area

KABAMICHIGAMA LAKE AREA

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

Ei*ct"y*gn**'? dayi

M^gn^Bnutar .. , dayi

RftrliCmwir , d*y*

InrlncaH polarization .,, ,... , d*y*

Othar dayt

Section 77 (19) tee "Mining Clilrro AMMMO" column

fiAnlngir.l dayl

13 narwh*miral days

Man days D Airborne D

Special provision D Ground Q

[EI Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

LT) Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claim* Aatsaaad

TB 489144 489146 489150-51

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

E] not sufficiently covered by the survey L~D Insufficient technical data filed

TB 489145 489147-48 489159

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits If necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical — 80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19)—60:828 (83/6)

Ontario

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Your file. #1

•1984 05 10 Ourfile: 2 - 6242

Mrs. A.M. HayesMining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 5G6

Dear Madam:

Enclosed are two copies of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please forward one copy to the recorded holder of the claims and retain the other. In approximately fifteen days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.

For further information, if required, please contact Mr. F.W. Matthews at 416/965-6918.

Yours very truly,

rundttorManagement Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A 1W3Phone: 416/965-1316

JL D. Kinvig:mc ' Ends.

cc: Donald Mcwilliams Suite 100 765 Sixth Street New Westminister, B.C. V3L 3C6

cc: Mr. G. H. FergusonMining b Lands Commissioner Toronto, Ontario

845

rMinistryof Notice of Intent NaturalResources for Technical Reports

Ontario1984 05 10

2.6242/1

An examination of your survey report indicates that the requirements of The Ontario Mining Act have not been fully met to warrant maximum assessment work credits. This notice is merely a warning that you will not be allowed the number of assessment work days credits that you expected and also that in approximately 15 days from the above date, the mining recorder will be authorized to change the entries on his record sheets to agree with the enclosed statement. Please note that until such time as the recorder actually changes the entry on the record sheet, the status of the claim remains unchanged.

If you are of the opinion that these changes by the mining recorder will jeopardize your claims, you may during the next fifteen days apply to the Mining and Lands Commissioner for an extension of time. Abstracts should be sent with your application.

If the reduced rate of credits does not jeopardize the status of the claims then you need not seek relief from the Mining and Lands Commissioner and this Notice of Intent may be disregarded.

If your survey was submitted and assessed under the "Special Provision-Performance and Coverage" method and you are of the opinion that a re-appraisal under the "Man-days" method would result in the approval of a greater number of days credit per claim, you may, within the said fifteen day period, submit assessment work breakdowns listing the employees names, addresses and the dates and hours they worked. The new work breakdowns should be submitted direct to the Lands Management Branch, Toronto. The report will be re-assessed and a new statement of credits based on actual days worked will be issued.

846 (82/6)

1984 01 06 Oup F1le: 2.6242

Mrs. Audrey HayesMining RecorderMinistry of Natural ResourcesP.O. Box 5000Thunder Bay, OntarioP7C 566

Dear Madam:

we have received reports and naps for a Geophysical survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Perfonunce and Coverage) on mining ci alas If 489144 et al 1n the area of KabanlchlgaM Lake.

This Material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

we do not have a copy of the report of work which 1s noreally filed with you prior to the submission of this technical data. Please forward a copy as soon as possible.

Yours very truly,

J.R. MortonActing DirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643Queen's ParkToronto, OntarioM7A U3Phone: 416/965-1380

M.E. Anderson:se

cc: Donald McUllllams 100-765 Sixth Street Mew Westminister, B.C. V3L 3C6

cc: H.T. Nelson1402 - 4th St MM Calgary, Alberta T2M 2Y9

1402 - 4th St. NW

Calgary, Alta. T2M 2Y9

Dec. 3, 1983

Minister of Natural Resources

Queens Park, Ont.

Dear Sir;

Enclosed please find report and maps

in duplicate covering assessment work that I performed on

some mining claims near Nipigon. I am applying for the max

imum of 40 days credit per claim for the magnetometer survey.

- As is noted in my statement of qual

ifications, I have not attended any university or technical

school; but, I feel that my long period of continuous em

ployment in the exploration field has qualified me to write

this report. This is not the first such report that I have

authored, but, it is not possible to obtain a copy of the

few that I have previously written.

I trust that you will look favourably

on my work and that you will judge it solely on its merits.

RECEIVEDJAN 41984

MINING LANDS SECTION

Yours respectfully,

II. T. Nelson

Howard Thomas Nelson, 1402 - 4th Street NW,

Calgary, Alta. T2M 2Y9

Age ; 54

Graduated High School, Quebec, 1946.

Employment: Gaspe Copper Mines Explorations ( Noranda)

Murdochville, P. Que.

1964 to 1979

Soil and Stream Sediment Sampling. Magnet

ometer and EM Surveys. Prospecting. Claim

Staking. Line Cutting. Crew Supervision. Etc

Taiga Consultants Ltd.

Suite 100, 1300 - 8th Street SW

Calgary, Alta. T2R 1B2

Soil, Stream and Lake Sediment Sampling.

Proton Magnetometer and VLF EM Surveys.

Radiometric Surveys. Prospecting. Ore Sampling

Mapping. Crew Supervision. Etc.

Noranda Exploration Company, Limited(no personal liability)

s-^ P.O. Box 2656 i Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 5G2

noranda Telephone (807) 623-4339 Telex 073-4659

November 7, 1983

To Whom It May Concern:

Howard Thomas Nelson now residing at 1402-4th Street N. W., Calgary, Alberta, had worked for Gaspe Copper Mines Exploration, a subsidiary of Noranda Mines over the past 15 years where I held the position of Chief Geologist of exploration in the eastern Quebec area .

He is competent to undertake and interpret magnetometer, geochemical and VLF E.M. surveys, having carried out numerous such surveys while employed under me .

Yours truly,

W. MaclsaacDistrict Geologist-Red LakeNorthwestern Ontario Division

W. Macl:js

F TAIGA CONSULTANTS LTD.SUITE 100, 1300 - 8TH STREET S.W. CALGARY, ALBERTA T2R 1B2 PH. (403) 233-7004

November 24, 1983

TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN

This letter is to acknowledge that Mr. H. T. Nelson was employed by Taiga Consultants Ltd. for a period of 2^ years commencing in February 1980.

During this time, his duties entailed prospecting; soil, water, lake sediment, and stream silt geochemical surveying (for both uranium and precious metals exploration programs); geophysical surveying (ground magnetics and VLF-EM); and supervision of linecutting and staking programs.

He has been required to undertake data presentation (e.g., diurnal correction and plotting of magnetic results, profiled plotting of EM-16 and Crone Radem VLF data, sample locations and grid layouts transferred to airphotos and topographic base maps), and cost and personnel summaries while supervising crews.

He has worked in the Provinces of Manitoba, Saskatchewan, and British Columbia; and in the Northwest Territories.

During this period of time, we found Mr. Nelson to be hard working, diligent, conscientious, innovative in his approach to any type of problem encountered while working in remote northern locations, and possessive of a good-natured personality.

We would unhesitatingly recommend him for employment in the field of mineral exploration.

Yours very truly, TAIGA CONSULTANTS LTD.

J. R. Allan, P.Geol.

:eb

OI3I&+,

X?

Oo

o

REFERENCES

AREAS WITHDRAWN FROM DISPOSITION

S.R.-SURFACE RIGHTS M.R. -MINING RIGHTS

OntarNo. DM* Dtaparitton Flto

SECTION 42 S RO 165414

SAND AND GRAVEL

GRAVEL PIT FILE 181630

RESERVE ANACONDA

RAILWAY 87045' P".E- '634.4

t

ARRELL LAKE G-57 8 87 030'

DEMPSTER ?\ Blackpool L

TB ' T B 'o, ' ^ 1489)51 |48915O K89145|

87*45' 789

GRAVEL RIVER G-4514 15 87030'

R RENOES

OONTRQL SURVEYS

Base line to22nd.nile post and Meriaian line surveyed by Phillips and Benner,O.L.S.,1916. Field NoteBook 2474.

Base Line Surveyed by Charles G Taylor OL.S.,1947 Field Note Book No.1165.

TOPOGRAPHYLakes. Rivers, etc., from forest Resources

Inventory Sheet. No 49Z673.

LEGEND

HIGHWAY AND ROUTE No

OTHER ROADS

TRAILS —

SURVEYED LINESTOWNSHIPS, BASE LINES, ETC. — LOTS, MINING CLAIMS, PARCELS, ETC.-

UNSURVEYED LINES:LOT LINES — PARCEL BOUNDARY — MINING CLAIMS ETC —

RAILWAY AND RIGHT OF WAY -*-

UTILITY LINES -o

NON PERENNIAL STREAM —

f LOODING OR FLOODING RIGHTS

SUBDIVISION OR COMPOSITE PLAN

RESERVATIONS

ORIGINAL SHORELINE

MARSH OR MUSKEG

MINES

TRAVERSE MONUMENT

-LO O-

DISPOSITION OF CROWN LANDS

TYPE OF DOCUMENT

PATFNT, SURFACF fii MINING RIGHTS

.SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY.l.,.

. MINING RIGHTS ONLY .

l TASE SURFACE 81 MINING RIGHTS

SURFACE RIGHTS ONLY.......

" .MINING RIGHTS ONL'Y..........

LICFNPF OF OCCUPATION .___......

ORDFR IN rOUNCIl .......___.,...

RESERVATION . .......__........

CANCELLED __ ....___....,...

SAND8.GRAVtL .....j,..,...

SYMBOL

9O

B

H

B

T

OC

NOTE. MININU RIGHTS IN PARCELS PATENTED P*1OR TO1P13 VESTFD IN ORIGINAL PATENTEE BY THE PUBLIC LANDS ACT. R.S O 1970. CHAP 38O. SEC. 63, SUBS6C 1.

SCALE: 1 INCH = 40 CHAINS

FEETO 1OOO 7OOO 4OOO 6000 8000

O 2OOMETRES

l OOO (1 KM)

2000(2 KMl

AREA

KABAMICHIGAMA LAKE

M.N.R. ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT

NIPIGONMINING DIVISION

THUNDER BAYLAND TITLES/ REGISTRY DIVISION

THUNDER BAY

Ministry of Natural

land

Ontario i

12 X MARCH X 1^8(1 f ;.Numhii

42F03Nweee5 2.6242 FOCH LAKE 200

o~

Z^

n Q