magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z philipp kronberg los alamos national laboratory 15 min...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z
Philipp Kronberg
Los Alamos National Laboratory
15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium
24 October 2008
![Page 2: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
RM probes of magnetic fields to high z
• Faraday RM + electron column densities from absorption spectroscopy lines, thermal X-rays …
gives
• <B> in galaxy systems to large z. Spectral resolution & sensitivity must be sufficient to estimate Weq.
Need a large optical telescope to explore faint spectra to large z!
• Magnetic fields now detected to z 3 and beyond
![Page 3: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
5 22 2
0
rad8.12 10 (1 ) ( ) ( ) ( )
m
s
e
z
RM z Bn z z zdl
Faraday rotation at a distant EGRS, and at an intervenor
B in Gauss, ne in cm-3, l in pc
χ0
χ0 + Δχ (= RM × λ2)
host galaxysystemat ze
interveninggalaxy system at za
![Page 4: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Alternatively:since what we measure is a column
density integral, Ne ,
re-write the RM expression as:13 22.63 10 (1 ) ,
/
a e
e e
RM z N B
B n B dl n dl
Kronberg P.P. , & Perry, J.J. ApJ 1982
For mathematical formalisms for probing high – z magnetic fieldssee
Welter, G.L., Perry, J.J. & Kronberg, P.P. ApJ 1984
![Page 5: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
1.Early thinking and attempts
M.J. Rees & M. Reinhardt A&A 1972A.H. Nelson PASJ 1973
P.P. Kronberg & M. Simard-Normandin Nature 1976P.P. Kronberg, M. Reinhardt & M. Simard-Normandin A&A 1977
![Page 6: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
RM growth for a widespread, magnetized IGM magnetized IGM
P. Kronberg, M. Reinhardt, & M. Simard-Normandin A&A 61, 771, 1977
P. Kronberg, & M. Simard-Normandin
Nature, 263, 653-656, 1976
Histograms of RRM (Galaxy-corrected)For 5 z - bins
The observed increase of RRM(z)was interpreted here to come from a widespread IGM!
![Page 7: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
P.P.Kronberg & J.J. Perry, ApJ 263, 518, 1982(37 RM + Abs. spectrum QSO’s)
G.L. Welter, J.J. Perry, & P.P. KronbergApJ 279, 19, 1984(119 RM sample, 40 had abs. spectra)
Earlier attempts to compare quasar RRM and absorption lines
![Page 8: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Early magnetic field estimates from [RM]-[optical absorption] comparison
Kronberg & Perry, ApJ 263, 518, 1982
Absorption lines were Mg II, N I, Lα, β, γ, Si II, Si IV, C II - V, Fe II, O VI
13 22.63 10 (1 ) , /a e e eRM z N B B n B dl n dl
*
*
![Page 9: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
3C191 a quasar jet (z = 1.95) with an ``associated’’ intervenor with rich absorption lines
P.P Kronberg, J.J.Perry & E.L.H. ZukowskiApJL 355, L31, 1990
Note: RM’s are up to ~ 2000 rad m-2 at zs
![Page 10: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
PKS 1229-021 a jet quasar at z = 1.03 behind a spiral galaxy at z = 0.4
Kronberg, Perry & Zukowski ApJ 387, 528-535, 1992
![Page 11: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
2. RM(z) Analysis of a Galaxy-corrected,
850/260 source RM sampleP.P. Kronberg, M. Bernet, S.J. Lilly, F. Miniati, Short, M.B., Higdon, D.M.
ApJ. March 2008 • New, off-plane RM dataset from measurements and
compilations of Kronberg and others. Mostly have a wide 2 coverage;
Considerable VLA & Effelsberg pol’n data • Sources had known z, luminosity, spectrum, etc. • Weeded of z-dependent sytematics• New, Bayesian methods developed to remove
Galactic foreground RM (M.B. Short, D.M. Higdon & P.P. Kronberg Bayesian Analysis. 2008)
![Page 12: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
5 22 2
0
rad8.12 10 (1 ) ( ) ( ) ( )
m
s
e
z
RM z Bn z z zdl
Faraday rotation at a distant EGRS, and at an intervenor
B in Gauss, ne in cm-3, l in pc
χ0
χ0 + Δχ (= RM × λ2)
host galaxysystemat ze
interveninggalaxy system at za
![Page 13: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Number – z range – Galaxy-corrected RM
![Page 14: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
27
-2 21 -2
15.5 10
3.5
20 rad m 1.7 10 cm
C
eRRM
zB G
N
For a typical intervening ``galaxy system’’ at z = 2.5:
Galaxy-corrected ``residual’’ RM (RRM) for ~ 800 RM sources to z 3.5
1. smallest RRM’s decline sharply beyond z 1.5
2. strongest RRM perturbations areat 20 – 100 rad m-2
3. Need: precise RM’s and GRM removal
Principal new result: The Universe becomes “Faraday RM – opaque”
at ~1.4 GHz to sources beyond z ~ 1.8
P.P. Kronberg 2007
![Page 15: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Cumulative RRM counts compared at z > 1 and z < 1
From Kronberg, Bernet, Miniati, Lilly, Short, & Higdon “ApJ 676, 70, March 2008 “A Global Probe of Cosmic Magnetic Fields to Large Redshifts”
for 0 z 3red & blue curves differ at > 3σ level
Cumulatice plot method:, with. error treatment, etc., in Welter, Perry & Kronberg ApJ 1984
![Page 16: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
3.New comparison of accurately determined
quasar RM subset with new MgII absorption data
M. Bernet, F. Miniati, S. Lilly, P. Kronberg, M. Dessauges-ZavadskyNature, 15 July, 2008
• 76-Quasar subset at 0.6 z 2, and |b| 30°
• Require radio - optical L.o.S. < 50 kpc at za, and mv<19
• RM’s by PPK (VLA, Effelsberg, ++) + literature RM’s• Typical RM measurement error ~ 2 rad m-2 (
• Spectra from 8m VLT, UVES (echelle) spectrograph
• Intrinsic (rest frame) Lorentzian width of RM = 7+6-2 rad m-2
(determined from larger RM sample study in Kronberg et al. ApJ Mar08)
![Page 17: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Ionization potentials of interstellar species:
MgII (singly ionized Mg): 15.035 eV 0 = 2796.35, 2803.53Å
-- excitation level close to that of hydrogen - 13.598 eV
-- compare: e.g. MgI (neutral) 7.646 eV
-- we measured on 0 = 2796.35Å
Ne = column density (cm-2) in the Faraday rotating absorption system
za = redshift of the Faraday rotating absorber
<B> = the ne-weighted magnetic field strength along the column defined by Ne
![Page 18: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Effect of MgII absorption (λλ2796.35, 2803.53 Å) on the RM’s of quasars
2.0 z 0.6 mV < 19, and |b| > 30°M.L. Bernet, F. Miniati, S.J. Lilly, P.P. Kronberg, M. Dessauges-Zavadsky
Nature 454, 302-4, 2008 Jul18
All sources
1 or 2 MgII systems
2 systems only
From new VLTObservations of MgIIabsorption linesin 2006-7. UVES spectrograph
![Page 19: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Cumulative plot versions RM for the same 3 different MgII absorption line groups
M.L. Bernet, F. Miniati, S.J. Lilly, P.P. Kronberg, M. Dessauges-Zavadsky Nature 454, 302-4, 2008
Method: G.L. Welter, J.J. Perry & P.P. Kronberg ApJ 279, 19, 1984
All sources
1 or 2 MgII systems
2 MgII systems only
Cumulative RM counts
![Page 20: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Summary of results (part 3)• Weq 0.3 – 0.6 is typical of galaxy with Ne 9.1019 cm-2 (Rao, S.M., Turnshek, D.A., Nestor, D.B. ApJ 636, 610, 2006)
• σMgII absorbers at restframe za 140+80-50 rad m-2
• σNo absorption 20+10-4 rad m-2 (“noise” level)
• A few source-associated (e.g. 3C191-like) systems are not ruled out
• Magnetic fields (without internal reversals) in intervenor galaxies over 0.6 z 2:
1
2 19 210 G
140rad m 9 10 cmMgII eN
B
![Page 21: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Principle conclusions from parts (2) and (3)
• (Part 3) Magnetic field strengths in galaxy systems (Ne 1020
cm-2) up to 60% of Hubble ago are at least comparable to <|B|> at z = 0 .
• Part (2) results indicate same, but 80% of Hubble ago
• i.e. confirms no evidence for a slow galactic dynamo field amplification over cosmic time
* * *
![Page 22: Magnetism in galaxy sytems at higher z Philipp Kronberg Los Alamos National Laboratory 15 min version for NRAO NM Symposium 24 October 2008](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062423/5697c0081a28abf838cc6efd/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Conclusion
• Late type galaxies contain, and expel magnetic fields of several G out to the largest z’s we can measure.
• The global RRM(z) development is concordant with latest detailed measurements on individual galaxies
• There are probably additions to the story