magna carta remains intact

Upload: tony-butler

Post on 14-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/30/2019 Magna Carta Remains Intact

    1/2

    Magna Carta Remains Intact :

    No Parliament, Judge or Monarch can alter it - lawfully.

    Magna Carta

    Parliament, has no authority to abrogate Magna carta or the Bill of Rights.

    All Monarchs and their governments are bound by the Coronation Oath, sworn by theincoming monarch.

    The Magna CartaWinston Churchill

    Here is a law which is above the King and Parliament, and which even He and They

    must not and may not legally break. And in the event they or anyone else were to try

    to abrogate it, such attempt at abrogation shall have no force nor effect and can be

    safely ignored with no legal ill effect. In addition, in the event of successful attempts

    at abrogation of such liberties, customs, or rights, the King has commanded and do

    hereby compel any and all subjects to swear oath to join the barons to assail the

    properties and persons and families of those (saving the King, Queen and the royal

    children) who had successfully completed such abrogation, including but not limited

    to that of the individual Members of Parliament who had voted in favour of any suchsuccessful attempts at abrogation. This reaffirmation of a supreme law and its

    expression in a general charter is the great work of Magna Carta; and this alone

    justifies the respect in which men have held it.

    The maggots infesting Parliament, have abrogated our rights and freedoms by

    allowing the EU power over usunlawfully.

    "We should recognise a hierarchy of Acts of Parliament: as it were "ordinary" statutes

    and "constitutional statutes". The special status of constitutional statutes follows the

    special status of constitutional rights. Examples are the Magna Carta, Bill of Rights

    1689 Ordinary statutes may be impliedly repealed. Constitutional statutes may

    not"

    Divisional Court ruling in the case of the "Metric Martyrs" 2002, (sections 62 and 63)

    It follows therefore that any changes made were unlawful and therefore invalid.

    It is our common law that needs restoring and the right to defend our individual

    freedoms granted by Magna Carta, in a true Court of Law, in which, both the law and

    the controversy are examined by a randomly selected jury, who reach their verdit

    according to their conscience.

    Tyranny by government and the judiciary can only be prevented by the jury, which

    possesses the authority to nullify bad and unjust laws by refusing to convict.

    The lie: "There is no excuse for breaking the law!" is the cry of the tyrant, laws

    are made to protect society, not to punish it. In the days when we issued a summons it

    always stated, "That you did, without lawful authority, or reasonable excuse commit

    the offence of ..." for no Jury would convict someone who acted reasonably in the

    circumstances.

    Trials, without a jury are unlawful, if the Government seeks to remove our liberty orseize our property it must by Law (common law) prent its case to a jury. Fines and

  • 7/30/2019 Magna Carta Remains Intact

    2/2

    seizures before conviction in a court of Common Law, by our peers (jury) are illegal

    and banned. The threat of fines before conviction in a court of law, void the offence.

    (Bill of Rights)

    Therefore, it is the enforcement of our 35 times ratified British Constitution that is

    required, the outlawing of the Law Society's use of Legalise to trick defendants andremove their Constitutional right to a trial by jury.

    We must restore the authority and powers of the Jury, which has been taken by the

    judges for themselves. A Judge has no lawful power in Common Law, to either

    judge, decide the penalty of those convicted, or select what evidence the Jury is

    allowed to see. Those powers belong to the jury, we are judged and sentenced by our

    peers.

    It is the independent and randomly selected twelve people who comprise a jury and

    are considered to hold, between them, the views of the 'country' that are the bedrock

    of democracy and freedom.

    Though wresting power back from the politicians and judiciary will be a battle, it is

    one that we cannot afford to lose.