mag & sp sur howry creek gold prosp · 2017-01-17 · 11ie4ne0es5 2.7566 roosevelt 010 howry...

11ie4NE0eS5 2 .7566 ROOSEVELT 010

HOWRY CREEK GOLD PROSPECT

REPORT

MAGNETIC 8, SP SURVEYS ON

CLAIMS S-593836, 720815-16

ROOSEVELT TWP. SUDBURY DIST.

ONTARIO

NTS 41 S 4

ARTHUR T. ELLIOTT 8 DEC. 1984

l DEC 131984iHATISRIU. RES

**.

**

CU

RTI

N

TP

. M

.74

5

41l84NEee55 8.7566 ROOSEVELT 010C

HOWRY CREEK GOLD PROSPECT

Magnetic 8. SP surveys 8 Dec.1984

CONTENTS;

Location map back of front cover.

Summary , in troduction Page One

Property Page Two

History Page Three

Geology

Survey methods

Survey results Page Four

Conclusions Page Five

APPENDIX:

M-1 - Magnetic contours M-2-Magnetic profiles SP-1-Self potential profiles

PAGE ONE

SUMMARYs

These surveys seem to have met their limited object

ives, namely delineating targets for intensive pros

pecting. The magnetics may confirm the presence of

a diabase dike outlined by K.D. Card OGS Rep.166

in 1978, as the general strike of the magnetic anom

alies corresponds. However, magnetic discontinuities

suggest roughly North-South faults with interpreted

displacements ranging from 150 to 500 feet. Some of

these estimates tend to be reinforced by apparent

offsets of a number of "SP signature profiles". The

range of magnetic values on the survey area is from

a low of 450 gammas to two highs of 1900 g., four

of 1800 g.and a number in the 1300-1650 range.

This range closely matches that developed by A,

James Walker, P.Eng. (July 1981) on a four-claim

survey on the north border of Murray Lake, 3,000 ft.

West of this survey area. Anomalies he identified as

being associated with the same dike (diabase) match

this survey, ranging from 471 g. to 1885 g. All our

magnetic work East of Walker's L.40E. has been integ

rated by adjusting the Sharpe MF-1 to 575 g* at a

datum post 50 ft. South of our BL850N+00,. that being

Walker's L.40E.+ SOON picket. Twelve Mag. anomalies

are targets for investigation, as are 23 S.P. anomalies,

PAGE TWO

SUMMARY (Cont.):

ten of which coincide with Mag. highs while another

six are closely associated, being in what we interpret

as "down-hill, down-dip" relationships, similar to

those obtained on the downhill side of interpreted

VLF EM conductors. (Elliott 1983 and Walker, 1981)

PROPERTY:

Subject claims S-593836 (Elliott 100 0Xo) S-720815-16

(G. Campbell 81 M. Dekeyser 50-50) are on the

easterly limit of the Howry Creek Prospect. No fur

ther staking will be permitted undsr regulations ob

taining from Ontario Regulation No. 343^3(June 7/83).

This Regulation took effect without prior notice to

claimholders hi the area and inhibits further explor

ation .

Access is by boat from the village of Willisville

on Charlton Lake through Howry Creek, one portage

to Murray Lake, thence hiking North on L40E to 850N

(BL 850 N+00) thence East on BL. to L.28E.BL termin

ates at L.56 E.The South boundary of these claims was

until June 7/83 Killarney Park boundary. For this

reason the u;iur, u-a! ; Dsif igura tion of t!i3 claims was

set out iy the Mining Recorder'* sfaff at Sudbury to

avoid fractional claims and other disparities relating

to the claims map. As staked they average l , /l 0,000 squ ,

PAGE THREE

PROPERTY (Con t.)

feet as compared with 1,742,000 squ. ft. (40 acres).

A series of roughly East by North ridges has visible

offsets to North and South, possibly indicating local

faults and shears.There is no evidence of previous

work other than staking and minor digging around out

crops possibly 50 years ago,

HISTORY

The Tough brothers are said to have prospected in the

area as early as 1910. A 70-foot shaft was sunk at

a point 6,800 ft. West of these claims on a vein of

arsenopyrite yielding up to 1.98 opt.Au, An adit was

driven from the South 421 feet slightly North and

West of the shaft, about 80 ft. below the shaft open

ing but failed to locate ore. Rock trenching was also

done at that time, in 1921. Since 1974 geophysical

surveys have covered the entire group of 18 contig

uous claims from 1,850 ft. West of the shaft to 9,600

fi-. East, including subject work, including geology

and VLF EM by Getty Mines Ltd. on the shaft claim;

magnetic and VLF EM on six claims by Dungarvon

Resources, magnetic and EM on four claims at Murray

Lake by Walker Exploration for Dungarvon; self potent

ial and magnetic surveys have now covered the ground

from the Curtin-Rooseve 11 boundary to the eastern

bouo^or/, indicating continuity throughout.

w

PAGE FOUR

GEOLOGY; ( Ref. Ontario Geoscience Report 131.)

The claims are mainly underlain by east-west trending

sedimentary rocks of the Middle Precambrian Gowganda

formation, greywacke argillites and sandctort e?. An east-

svest trending Nipissing Diabase dike seems to occupy

the north half of the subject claims, with meta-sedimen ts

to the south evident in a steep shear to the major Howry

Creek fault east-west through the river system. Minor

quartz veins are visible at some outcrops.

SURVEY METHODS:

An existing base line was extended from Line 28E to L. 56 E

with N-S liners turned off at 400' intervals. Lines were

picketed at 50' station inter/oils. A. Sharpe MF-1 magnet-

omter courtesy Coni c o Ltd. was employed, integrated w It S

Walker's work to the West as previously described. Diurnal

control was exefc iied by using baseline datum points at

line crossings. Correct ions applied ranged from 25-300 g,

A Sampson 464 Multimeter (digital)with appropriate ceramic

probes with s e s i t i y i t y to .3001 mv. '.vai o -n p ! j y 9 d for the

Self potential survey. No tield notes w ere t aksn as 10 ouiCiop an o oDVreir b u.ndiem but glacial clay ir, o o: -3 r •f i -J " .1

some low lying areas and doubtless has a masking effect.

SURVEY RESULTS:

Magnetite up to S Vo i s known to exist in the diabase along

ith pyrrotire which may contribute to anomalous highs.

PAGE FIVE

SURVEY RESULTS (Cont.)

However, it is borne in mind t In of about 1,000,000 tans

of low grade copper ore has been outlined on Aggressive

Mines Ltd. property westerly on strike in the same dike*

Some interpreted sulphide zones (SP) coincide with Mag,

highs, whereas others persist where magnetic values ara

low.In hindsight, lack of field notes cis to outcrop and

overburden, especially clays, makes interpretation ex

tremely difficult, if not imposs ibl e .The outcome is that

all anomalies should be checked by intensive prospecting

including trenching and sampling. An alternate series of

lines at 200' spacing with Mag. and SP. with close attent

ion to ground conditions would help to clarify things.

CONCLUSIONS:

Location of prospecting targets has been

accomplished. The magnet5c survey tends to confirm the

east-west trend to formations and suggests north-south

fault zones. The same can He said for the SP sur/sy.

Interpreted SP sulphide zones where not associated with

Mag. highs c u!d represent the presence of arsenopyrite

with associated gold, cobalt, minor copper and platinum

group metals. When the half intensity formula is applied

to the magnoti: highs, depth to target for a series of

dipoles ranges from 35-75 ft. Intense but relatively narrow

SP values suggest narrow targets closer to surface possibly

at rock surface in f some cases, suggesting the possibility of sources o t li e r t'nan i r on d erivatives. END.

Ontario

Ministry of Natural Resources

GEOPHYSICAL - GEOLOGICAL - GEOCHEMICAL TECHNICAL DATA STATEMENT

File.

TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT

TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.

Type of Survey(s)

Township or Area

Claim Holders)

S.

' 0AMP&SLL (9*72691*'-Survey Company

Author of Report

f A

Address of Author tffGjf

Covering Dates of Survey.

Total Miles of Line Cut

(Knecutting to office)

SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED

ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.

ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.

,, , . , Geophysical

Electromagnetic

DAYS per claim

Radiometric

-OtWr S . f*. g O

Geological.

Geochemical.

AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne iiirveyi)

Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic. . Radiometric(enter days per claim)

SIGNATURE:

Res. Geol.. . Qualifications

Previous Surveys File No. Type Date Claim Holder

MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically

(prefix) (number)

i

TOTAL CLAIMS.

837 (6/79)

GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA

GROUND SURVEYS - If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey

Number of Stations

Station interval Profile

.Number of Readings

.Line spacing

Contour interval. f. r.

Instrument A*/?/

Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method. Base Station check-in interval (hours) X*-*- Z.

Base Station location and value S.L. 9&G *"M -t- x.*f t Sif,

if 7 f .

W*,

O Instrument

Z1s Qo! ZwjM

Cnil rnnfjgiiratinn

flnil separation

Amirary

Method: EH Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back O In line

Frpqnenry(specify V.L.F. station)

d Parallel line

—————— iParameters measured.

InstrumentScale constant.

Corrections made.

^ Base station value and location.

Elevation accuracy.

ZoH•(Csu*tk-

2INDUCED

H

gH- 1

22S3 MD*

Instrument ———————,——— Method D Time Domain

Parameters — On time -—— - Off time ___

— Delay time ^——

— Integration time.

f~l Frequency Domain

_ Frequency ______ Range ^—--.————

Power.

Electrode array —

Electrode spacing . Type of electrode

SELF POTENTIAL

Instrument ^X/V^g^^V flJT A/g/7?* -l A V^f/ fiS Z Tfr X _______ Rang*

Survey

Corrections made

RADIOMETRIC

Instrument.Values measured.Energy windows (levels) -——-—————^——-——^.—^—.—.————-.—-^^-^—^— Height of instrument____________________________Background Count, Size of detector——————————————————————-.——.^—.^™™.......—.—Overburden .———..---.—.—-^^^.——.——--——^--—-.-—.—.....^..—^.—-——...——-———.

(type, depth — include outcrop map)

OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)

Type of survey^^——^——^.^.——-—^--———. Instrument -^———^——^^^——^-———————————Accuracy——————————————————————————Parameters measured.

Additional information (for understanding results).

AIRBORNE SURVEYS

Type of survey(s)———

Instrument(s) —————(specify for each type of survey)

Accuracy-^——————————^-^(specify for each type of survey)

Aircraft used———-———-———.^-.-——————-—-—————.——-—

Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.

Aircraft altitude________________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area________________________Over claims only-

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Numbers of claims from which samples taken.

Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.

(Nature of Material)

Average Sample Weight——————— Method of Collection—————————.

Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain———————

Drainage Development——————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.

ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent D

p. p. m. Op. p. b. D

Cu, Pb,

Others—

Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As.-(circle)

Field AnalysisExtraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used——

Field Laboratory AnalysisNo. -————————.

SAMPLE PREPARATION (Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)

Mesh size of fraction used for analysis.———

Extraction Method. Analytical Method - Reagents Used.——

Commercial Laboratory (. Name of Laboratory.— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used -————.

.tests)

.testsW

-tests)

General. General.

Ministry ofNaturalResources

Ontario

Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)

The Mining Act

Instructions: - Please type or print. If number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list.Note: Only days credits calculated in the

"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.

Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survey(s) *- s v 'C f Township or Area

Claim Holder(s) Prospector's Licence No.

Address

Survey Company Date of Survey (from 81 to)

Name and Address of Author (of Qeo-Technical report)

7 H ill 1 9f oi,,*/^. *^\Mo. l Yr. j Day | Mo. | Yr. f/ffC f /'O**,/

Total Miles of line Cut

Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions

For first survey:

Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)

For each additional survey: using the same grid:

Enter 20 days (for each)

Man Days

Complete reverse side and enter total (s) here

Airborne Credits

Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other O" r,

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

W

20

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)

Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed

Performed on Claim(s)

Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits

Total ExpendituresTotal

Days Credits

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holds*-f choice. Enter number of days credits per claim in columns at right.

Mining ClaimPrefix

s^

Number

Xeo 8/f?ZO*ii

Expend. Days Cr.

Mining ClaimPrefix Number

Expend. Days Cr.

Total number of mining claims covered by this ^, report of work.

Certification Verifying"fieport of Work^ s

*/ For Office Use Only^ptal Days Cr. Recorded

Date Recorded

Date Approved as Recorded

Mining Recorder

Branch Director

l hereby certify that l have a personal and inj/mate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying

Date Certified l

9 OfC1362 (81/9)


Ontario


The Mining Act

Instructions: — Please type or print. If number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list.Note: - Only days credits calculated in the


Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survey(s)

/k*c~#*T/* y-Claim Holder(s)

Township or Area ^ /

Prospector's Licence No.

C^srtf*Add rets y '3 rSurvey Company Date of Survey (from 6c to), f *V\z7 , 7

y | Mo. | Yr. | Day | Mo. | Yr.aDay


Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)


For first survey:




Man Days


Airborne Credits


Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other 5", /*.Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days perClaim

W

±0

Days per Claim

Days per Claim





Days Credits

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected In columns at right.

Date ent (Signature)

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim

PrefixJ"

Number

&38S&

Expend, Days Cr.

Mining ClaimPrefix

, ' . .

NumberExpand. Days Cr.

Total number of mining claims covered by this f report of work.

For Office Use OnlyTotal Days O. Recorded

Date Recorded


Mining Recorder

Branch Director

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.

Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying c ~Date Certitted Cert

1362 (81/9)

Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

File No

TYPE OF SURVEY tX GEOPHYSICAL

____ GEOLOGICAL

____ GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

MINING LANDS COMMENTS;

u

* '

Signature of Assessor

Date

1985 02 20 File: 2.7566

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources199 Larch StreetSudbury, OntarioP3E 5P9

Dear Sir:

RE: Geophysical (Magnetometer and Self Potential) Survey on Mining Claims S 593836 and S 720815*16 In the Township of Roosevelt

The Geophysical (Magnetometer and Self Potential) Survey assessment work credits as shown on the attached statement have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the claim holder that these credits are available If he/she elects to file a new report of work.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Managtwent Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3Phone:(416)965-4888

D. K1nv10:mc

cc: Art Elliott 438 High Street London, Ontario M6C 4L5

cc: Gordon T.J. Campbell 18 Koran Road Scarborough, Ontario HIS 2J1

Encl.

Ministry of Technical Assess Natural .., . - . tl P^sources Work Credits

Ontario ^^

ment f"* 2.7566

Date Mining Recorder's Report of1985 02 20 workfjo.

Recorded Holder ^ E LLIOTT760RDON CAMpBELL

Township or Area ROOSEVELT TOWNSHI p

Type of survey and number ol Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

Flei-trnmdgnMir dayi

i

Msgn*lom"t*r . ^ daV*

nth.. Self Potential 20 H,V.

Section 77 (19) S** "Mining Clalmt Attested" column

Geological . dayi

Repch"rmral days

Man days D Airborne D

Special provision Q Ground Q

O Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

O Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claims Assessed

S 593836 720815-16

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

LJ not sufficiently covered by the survey LJ Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical 80; Geological 40; Geochemical 40; Section 77(19) 60:

828 (83/6)

January 21, 1985 File: 2.7566

Art Elliott 438 High Street London, Ontario M6C 4L5

Dear Sir:

RE: Geophysical (Radiometric and Magnetometer) Survey on Mining Claims S 593836, et al. In the Township of Roosevelt

It 1s our understanding that mining claims S 593836, S 720815-16 have recently been cancelled. If and when these claims are reinstated and you wish the assessment credits for this survey, please provide an explanation of the S. P, survey method (I.e. pots-one fixed and one moving or both moving along the traverse line).

For further Information, please contact Mr. Ray Piche t te at (416)965-4888.

Yours sincerely,

S. E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1U3 Phone:(416)965-4888

A. Barr:me

cc: Mining Recorder Sudbury, Ontario

.' - O

i \' v

^:

/ j j

f'S*/p*~v^ f. v-

\ ^Y" K ' Avv .rt

/" Hv/A C

V'

cc: Gordon T.J. Campbell 18 Koran Road Scarborough, Ontario MIS 2J1

. V

Ontario

Ministry ofNaturalRes^jces

GeotechnicalReportApproval

Mining Lands Comments

File

L^4les ^re t o/?*? ara d /If'X /*?v6g/?.

To: Geophysics ^ ft fi fi Q \A/

Comments

_^.^^ -..J^ITI:^^jJL^^^ ;

:t

7~~" Date

Approved ("T^Wish to see *9ain with corrections * l (P/

l To: Geology - Expenditures

Commentsf 4

f |,

S!T

l f

Date [~\ Approved [ | Wish to see again with corrections

l To: Geochemistry

Comments

vy, ,,^, \

.iT ' X

7

Signature

[^Approved Q Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

; j [To: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)

1693/81/10.)

ario

Mirtistry ttNaturalResources

Ontario Government Building 199 Larch Street, 10th Floor Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 5P9

1985 01 OH

MEMORANDUM TO:

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management BranchRoom 6450, Whitney BlockToronto

Your file: 2. 7 56 6

Our file:

RECEIVEDJAN Oy 1985

MINING LANDS SECTION

ATTENTION: J.C. Smith, Supervisor Mining Lands Section

SUBJECT: Your Memo 1984 12 21Re: Geophysical (Radiometric 8 Magnetometer) Survey Mining Claims S.593836 et al

_____ Roosevelt Township - .

Thank you for supplying me with xeroxes of "Reports of Work" received at your office in December 1984, covering the subject mining claims.

Here are copies of registered letters that I have directed to the former recordecj, holders.

Please pass this on to Mr. Arthur Barr of your section.

V.C. Miller Mining Recorder Sudbury Mining Division Telephone: (705) 675-4125

VCM/rk Attachments


Your file: 28760

29672


1985 01 04

MEMORANDUM TO:

G.H. FergusonMining S Lands CommissionerToronto

SUBJECT: Mining Claims S. 593836 and S. 720815-16 incl,Roosevelt Township (G. 318 3) District of

________ Sudbury ________ \ -——.™— [ —-—-——.——— —

Here are xerox copies of registered letters that I have directed to the following individuals:

(a) Mr. Art Elliott, London, Ontario - File No. .287.6.0.

(b) Messers. Gordon T. J. Campbell, Agincourt, Ontario - ^^Martin Dekeyzer, St. Thomas, Ontario -

Np.., .29672.

I am attaching an updated map (whiteprint) of Roosevelt Township (G. 3183) for your general information.


VCM/rk attachments

'rrinir1ittiiifTiv

Ministry bf-NaturalResources

REGISTERED MAIL

Office of the Mining Recorder Ontario Government Building 199 Larch Street, 10th Floor Sudbury, Ontario, P3E 5P9

January 3, 1985

Mr. Art Elliott 438 High Street London, Ontario N6C 4L5

Dear Mr. EI liott:

SUBJECT: Mining Claim S.593836, Roosevelt Township (M.1081 4 G.3183) District of Sudbury

Mining Claim S.593836 is cancelled effective January 3, 1985, under Section 85-1(c) of the Mining Act; which reads:

"Except as provided by section 86 all the interest of the holder of a mining claim before its patent has issued ceases without any declaration entry or act on the part of the Crown or by any officer, and the claim is open for prospecting and staking out, if the prescribed work is not duly performed."

This mining claim was under an extension Order of the Mining X Lands Commissioner for the performance of deficiency of work, and the filing of due proof thereof, to and including December 7, 1984.

On December 28, 1984, l received a letter from our Mining land's section (Land Management Branch) requsting a copy of the "Report of Work", that is normally filed with the Mining Recorder, covering reports and maps they had received on December 14, 1984, from the Southwestern Ontario Regional Office.

You may have completed a Geophysical (Radiometric and Magnetometer) Survey on this mining claim, but l did not receive a completed "Report of Work Form" by Monday, December 10, 1984 allowing for the mail delivery; therefore this mining claim is cancelled.

You may have submitted certain documentation through the Southwestern Office of the Ministry of Natural Resources at London, Ontario to our Toronto Office, but Section 15(1) of the Mining Act Chapter 268, R.S.0.1980 still applies.

... 12

January 3, 1985Mr. Art EM iott

Killarney Provincial Park went into Regulation on June 7, 1983 under Ontario Regulation No.343/83. by virtue of our office not receiving a work report within the prescribed time limit. Section 76(3): the ground came open, and is now part of the Killarney Provincial Park. Section 32 of the Mining Act prohibits staking of mining claims in a Provincial Park.

Yours very truly,

f! v/vV. C. Mi l ler.Min i ng Recorder Sudbury Mining Division Telphone (705) 675-4125

VCM/ks Att'd: 2

E.N. ArbuckleG.H. FergusonE.A. WrightJ.C. Smith

Espanola DistrictMining 4 Lands Commissioner - Toronto Regional Parks - N.E. Region Mining Lands Section - Toronto

i P oni.rio RMOure** The Mining Act j S. 593836 'RECORDED IN THE NAME OF i , LICENCE NO. RECEIPT NO. . DATE RECORDED

ART ELLIOTT ' C. 31734 H. 269690 June 8 . 1983ADORESI ^^

408^rgh Street, London, Ontario N6C 4L5

orficf u se ONLY RECORDED •* L * KCE

P o u

l!t-ox t-

i!DATE

—June- .8 /S 3—-.

j'jvio 11/84

DAYS WORK

———————— ..

. ——————— .

Assay Coupons (2)

DATE ANtl IIMC O f, S TAKING P. T.

June 4/83 2:00 p.m. X

ROOSEVELT TWP. (M. 1081)

Including Land Under Water

FILE NO

s. 593^36

,s

Order of Mininp ft Lands Commissioner extends time(S. 593836}until and including December 7, 1984 for work. -"

CANCELLED

L^ . ...JANI3J85.^. M1H1NSACT ^^-^

"- \ .-Si iS^Hr^^j , . i; ^ ^^^~l "{\^\kj?^jjIs^S^L ' ~ JJ

- .^

'

RECEIPT NO.

'

H.11511J

|: : J, .'.'' **)(V*0)

Ministry of Natural' '

Resources

REGISTERED MAIL

Office of the Mining Recorder Ontario Government Building 199 Larch Street, 10th Floor Sudbury, Ontar io, P3E 5P9

January 3, 1985

Mr. Gordon T.J. Campbel 18 Moran Road Agincourt, Ontario M1S 2J1

Dear Mr. Campbell :

SUBJECT: Mining Claims S.720815 and S.720816 Roosevelt Township _______(M.1081 A G.3183) District of Sudbury——————————

Mining Claims S.720815-16 are cancelled effective January 3, 1985, under Section 85-1(c) of the Mining Act; which reads:

"Except as provkJed by section 86 all the interest of the holder of a mining claim before its patent has issued ceases without any declaration entry or act on the part of the Crown or by any officer, and the claim is open for prospecting and staking out, if the prescribed work is not duly performed."

These mining claims were under an extension Order of the Mining i, Lands Commissioner for the performance of deficiency of work, and the filing of due proof thereof, to and including December 14, 1984.

On December 28, 1984, l received a letter from our Mining land's section (Land Management Branch) requesting a copy of the "Report of Work", that is normally filed with the Mining Recorder, covering reports and maps they had received on December 14, 1984, from the Southwestern Ontario Regional Office.

You may have completed a Geophysical (Radiometric and Magnetometer) Survey on this mining claim, but l did not receive a completed "Report of Work Form" by Monday, December 17, 1984 allowing for the mail delivery; therefore these mining claims are cancelled.

You may have submitted certain documentation through the Southwestern Office of the Ministry of Natural Resources at London, Ontario to our Toronto Office, but Section 15(1) of the Mining Act Chapter 268, R.S.0.1980 still applies; which reads:

,.J2

January 3, 1985Mr. Gordon T.J. Campbel

"Except as in this Act otherwise provided, the recorder's office is the proper office for filing and recording all applications, documents and other instruments required or permitted to be filed or recorded under this Act, affecting any unpatented mining claim or any right, privilege or interest that may be acquired under this Act respecting an unpatented mining claim, and all such applications, documents and instruments may, before patent, be filed or recorded in such office, but, after patent, the Land Titles Act or the Registry Act, as the case may be, applies."

Killarney Provincial Park went into Regulation on June 7, 1983 under Ontario Regulation No.343/83 by virtue of our office not receiving a work report within the prescribed time limit Section 76(3); the ground came open, and is now part of the Killarney Provincial Park. Section 32 of the Mining Act prohibits staking of mining claims in a Provincial Park.

Yours very truly,

V. C. Mi ller Mining Recorder Sudbury Mining Division Telephone (705) 675-4125

VCM/ks Att'd: 2

jC...c.: E.N. ArbuckleE.A. WrightG.H. FergusonJ.C. Smith

- Espanola District- Regional Parks - N.E. Region- Mining 4 Lands Commissioner ~ Mi n i ng Lands Sect i on

m

i i'

t it

.

\\

jj

i i

i t t

ii

! *

f li

,

i'

i

i l-

l f

i1

ii*'

t

i i ( :

i

.j t

i !

l

j

i....

... .j

I 1

. . 1

1 f

j !

i

i

t i

-

f

1 '

-

1 1

[ i

. ih

V^^"-

1

t i . ^ ^

* ™

~

- f

'"'ip"

'

* * IP

f i j ; -~-

•^.-

^6

^^-j,

*

i

k

L' S

^

/~\

t^5

.1/

|

; |O

i

^ S

:So

Pi

' i

' i

! j i

1^

i0

Uj j

^ ^

?: B *~

~

ci

,. c^

L ™^.

_ . ^

i j^T {/^

i

O3

fLf^

?c^

C/^

r^

n\ji

l^—

(/^"

"*f.

^^*

1 \

i

C,-

^•"•

*

s O-"

Z:

^•'

. —

-,-^

^-

3>

i.-

^

'l.1;

? S

arJ

, — ..j

o^ i.

-

^"

2. ~

O 0

— o

S" (

rt3*

0."

~-

rg CL

i -3

'T

W

^ 1&

:2

H-

: T)

bH

' : 4

[W

g !i -

Po G

^

S'

^3"

bM

i S

' IS

'C

,J

9 1^

W

pj

; JO

t"*J

j t,

| jjo

W

^•^

^,

; |(D

-^' '

•j^ ;

-J

^

,.r ^

~? !

'-,

' ^i T*

i

S'

'

^. i H

-1

-, icn

(75

it"1

|c

f

OiS

lg

0

j P

- i0

0

w

|sn)

lot

3 o

hC

T ' O

iir

fft)

i 3

K

"T

'3

'

'H-

loM

i w

ire

ir

! ro

i?5*

' M*,

ij O

jN

MID

re

MD

l 0

j-H

00

14

l

* .

F^

X

Us

O

cr

i**

-J

Id)

l*-

j t^

fC^

•51'~

K ^

O-

! W

i-N

4--]

: ico

-

PSTV

) 1 C

f j-

* o i

M-

rxoo

i 3

oM

J0

!ooVJ

1 i

jj"^

•^—^

V

F*T*

x

.3 l

isLO

l

\a\

I—1

iVO

vn

i S

"

P s

(-!N

i

!

0 ^ m So ^w ;a M n 2 z

o

AS

SE

SS

ME

NT

W

OR

K

CR

ED

ITS

A

SS

IGN

ED

T

O

OT

HE

R

CL

AIM

S

1

CO

2*

m

IS3

P

O oo Ui ,

o 2 o n c M M

O z r m O? m

O

: 0

rCO W

W fx

i^ * x^x

S f—"

0 oo H—

*

H-

5oo

S

i.

5S

"

^^^K

o 0 !^ o SS^^

^H

w

a.

H g*

( i^

- ic

o•j,. TO

'-f

"H

-3 O 0 C rt

o z o *

BBo

j 2rr H

-O s f—

* W r^ u,

*C

* 0

c 2

(D ; O

0

J

00

o M

icS

J

L

t-

O

5

k "

NJ

; o

-

35

S*

0

tO

2

^5

* ^•

J o

VO S3 e .

oc

s3

f\

w

So

s

oo W

*Mi

ol

to 0

O 3 O o "^ 4

x * *

j

to C^s?

1.^ H-4

CD

H*

O^"^

2,\^

* l*^

5 x* 30 i i -i 3"

C 3 3

M n

cco

Si

ISJ

PO oo x

. tx^JLJ1192RECORDED IN THE NAME OF

* " *" sGORDON THOMAS JOHN CAMPBELL

ABDREIS ^^

18. M^pi Rd., Agincourt , Ontario,

w n

o"

los*So8"

— J-Ul

Ju

OFFICE USE ONLY

DATE

ae 30/83...ne 12/84

—— .J...— w^

CAYS WORK

. ———————— .

————————

-—— —————

Transfers 50%

Onuno The Mining ActCLAIM NO

S. 720816 'LICENCE NO. RECEIPT NO. , D ATE RECORDED

C. 34201 ' H. 269792 June 30, 1983DATE AND TIME Ol (TAKING P. t.

MIS 2J1 s June 10/83 @ 3:00 p.m. ^ xx fRECORDED " 1-*'ICt (


RESERVATIONS — 400 fOOT SURFACE RltMTf RCtCRVATION AROl MHO ANB CIAVtL RIIItVID.

INCLUDING LAND UNDER WATE!

interest to Martin Dekeyzer (A. 44468) (S

Order of Mining S Lands Commissioner extends

RD ALL LAIII AND IIVIII.

l '

FILE NO

S. 720815 '

s .720815)

time

until and including December 1^, 198^4 for worK.CAiNCELLED ..........,.,.......^.,.ULt^*l**- j . ^ j ; ^ (^ ( ;f ^

j AN " 3 1985 ^^- j i^- - "1 ^ :S/ Jf'tbS:!ii'-::; in the

cniMdwil a;.

MINING ACT '^i-^O | j A i 1?- b wo

]~3^^^-^^\ ^':^ti[i};\ M iKiNii t');visio;^ - l ^ _ , f t ^ i

RECEIPT NO.

H269792

yH. 315116

•40 (&W)

WX3 ma

r''t

llano

Ministry of Natural - Resources

REGISTERED MAIL


January 3, 1985

Mr. Martin Dekeyzer 151 Forest Avenue St. Thomas, Ontario N5R 2J9

Dear Mr. Dekeyzer:

SUBJECT: Mining Claims S.720815 and S.720816 Roosevelt Township ______'(M. 1081 A G.3183) District of Sudbury—^———————

Mining Claims S.720815-16 are cancelled effective January 3, 1985, under Section 85-1(c) of the Mining Actj which reads:


These mining claims were under an extension Order of the Mining i Lands Commissioner for the performance of deficiency of work, and the filing of due proof thereof, to and including December 14, 1984.




...12

January 3, 1985Mr. Martin Dekeyzer



Yours very truly,

nV. C. Mi Mer Mining Recorder Sudbury Mining Division Telephone (705) 675-4125

VCM/ks Att'd: 2

c.c.: E.N. ArbuckleE,A. WrightG.H. FergusonJ.C. Smith

Espanola District Regional Parks - N.E. Region Mining 8, Lands Commissioner

..M. J J] LnJ9 J-.S

1984 12 21 Your File: Our Filet 2.7666

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources199 Larch StreetSudbury* OntarioP3E 5P9

Dear Sirs

Me received reports and naps on December 14, 1984 for a Geophysical (Radiometric and Magnetometer) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims S 693836 et al 1n the Township of Roosevelt.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

He do not have a copy of the report of work which Is normally filed with you prior to the submission of this technical data. Please forward a copy as soon as possible.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-6918A. Barr:se

ccl Mr. Art Elliott 438 High Street London, Ontario N6C 4L5

cc: Gordon T.J. Campbell 18 Moran Road Scarborough, Ontario MIS 2J1

\ \\ S 31 8 O S 67265O

ST208I4

LAKE

L28E L32

LEGEND

L3bE L4OE

Shoreline SwampGrid S tns t

L 46 E L56E

Scale 1/4 inch r 50'

Claim line,post —— ___ l Pi

Profile Scale- 10mv. - 1 0mm.

Neg. r ^^

P o s. z "" - ,.

Int. Sulphides- DDAAflBO^U D to - 20-40-60 - 9Qmv.

N

HOWRY CREEK GOLD PROSPECT•CAU, M4 n - so'

D*Ti,28NOV.'84

APPROVED' DRAWN BY A T E

MEVIVCO

SELF POTENTIAL SURVEY PROFILES SIMPSON 463 DIGITAL-(to .oooimv)

ART ELLIOTT EXPLORATIONDRAWIHO NUMBUt

SP-1

41IB4NE00S5 2.7566 ROOSEVELT 300

\ \

ST208U

LAKE

S593833

S847166

S 31 8 9 S 672650

D

N

L28E L32

LEGEND

L3bE L4OE

Shoreline Swamp

Grid Stns *

.it L 48 E L52E L56E

Scale - 1/4 inch = 50'

Cla im line, post ——

Profile Scale- 1 00g. - 5mm.

Med l an - 800g.

41I04NE0055 2.7566 ROOSEVELT

11'X14 PRINTED ON NO. IOOOH C L.EARPH1NT

210

HOWRY CREEK GOLD PROSPECT•CALK, t/4 - 50'

DATE, 2 6 NOV.'84

APPROVED BY i DRAWN BY A T E

REVIVED

MAGNETIC SURVEY PROFILES SHARPE FLUXGATE MF l

ART ELLIOTT EXPLORATIONDRAWING NUMBCJt

M-2

\ \\ S 31 8 9 S 672650

ST208I4

LAKE

S593833

S847166

N

L28E L32

LEGEND

L3bE LAO E

Shoreline SwampGrid Stns *

L 48 E L52E L56E

Scale 1/4 inch = 50'

C la im line, post ——

Contours 500-1000-ISOOgammas

100g

2.7566 ROOSEVELT

UKI4 PRINTED ON NO. 1QOUH CLEAKPRINT

HOWRY CREEK GOLD PROSPECT•CALM, 1/4 r 50

DATE, 2ft NOV.'84

APPROVED BY t

'f-'- 's* r /DRAWN BY A T E

KCVIVED

MAGNETIC SURVEY, VERTICAL COMPONENT SHARPE FLUXGATE MF l CONTOURED

ART ELLIOTT EXPLORATIONDM AW l HO MUMMM

GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD

Num

bers

of c

laim

s fr

om w

hich

sam

ples

take

n.O

File

.

Ont

ario

2 . 7566 ROOSEVELT

TEC

HN

ICA

L,

DA

TA

90

0

TO B

E A

TTA

CH

ED A

S A

N A

PPEN

DIX

TO

TEC

HN

ICA

L R

EPO

RT

FACT

S SH

OW

N H

ERE

NEE

D N

OT

BE R

EPEA

TED

IN R

EPO

RT

TEC

HN

ICA

L RE

PORT

MUS

T C

ON

TAIN

IN

TER

PRET

ATI

ON

, CO

NC

LUSI

ON

S ET

C.

Tota

l Num

ber o

f Sam

ples

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

—

AN

ALY

TIC

AL

MET

HO

DS

Type

of S

ampl

e ——

—

——

—

—

——

——

——

——

——

——

—

Val

ues

expr

esse

d in

: pe

rcen

t D

(Nat

ure

of M

ater

ial)

r r

. — .

p. p

. m

. 1 _

lA

vera

ge S

ampl

e W

eigh

t p

p b

EHM

eth"H

nf

rVil

Wti

nn

Cu,

Pb,

Zn,

Ni,

Co,

A

g,

Mo,

A

s.-(c

ircle

)

S^il

H""

^.nn

Sam

pled

O

ther

sH

rm7r

m T

Vvp

lnpm

pnt

Fiel

d A

naly

sis

( ——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

test

s)

Sam

ple

TVpt

h E

xtra

ctio

n M

etho

d

Tprr

ain

A

nal

yti

cal

Mpt

hnH

Rea

gpnt

s TT

spd

praJ

nagp

npv

plnp

inpn

t Fi

eld

Labo

rato

ry A

naly

sis

F.c

tim

-jtp

d R

ang

e o

f D

vprh

nrd

pn T

hic

k n

ess

No

. (

test

sV

Ex

trac

tio

n M

ethnd

*

Ana

lytic

al M

etho

d .

. ,

,.

Rea

gpnt

s U

sed

SA

MP

LE

PR

EP

AR

AT

ION

C

om

mP

rcia

l T

.ahn

ratr

wy

( t~

t.)

(Inc

lude

s dr

ying

, sc

reen

ing,

cru

shin

g, a

shin

g)

' '

Nam

e of

Lab

orat

ory

Mes

h si

re n

t fr

acti

on i

ispr

f fo

r an

alysi

sE

xtr

art

inn

Mp

thn

rl

Ana

lytic

al M

pth^

HR

eapr

pnts

TIs

pH

- .

Gen

eral

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

Hen

pra

l

S 5^ O ^3 M

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

—

S b

fa—

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

——

—

1 0 i

Type

of

Surv

ey(s

) —4 a

Tow

nshi

p or

Are

a /\

Clai

m H

old

er(s

)^^

G*i

Sur

vey

Com

pany

jfM

Aut

hor

of R

epor

t _ A

Add

ress

of

Aut

hor

^

Cov

erin

g D

ates

of S

urv

Tot

al M

iles

of L

ine

Cu

SPEC

IAL

PRO

VIS

KCR

EDIT

S RE

QU

ESr

) EN

TER

40

days

(in

c lin

e cu

tting

) fo

r fir

st

surv

ey.

ENTE

R 2

0 da

ys f

or

addi

tiona

l sur

vey

usi

sam

e gr

id.

'jn

TG

rflt

f i f

' (^,

*~p^

*^

* **

't)M

3\F

et.~

r *r

wP'l*

fLL

JA*f ff -*

13

834}

M.

GAM

f)*S

Lll

(S'7

Zfi

ei*'

- '6

)*f

"2t.

{Sfi

7? J

?lL

F!l

.6ff

jpfl

6fS

\j?7~

g~L

^0Tr

~ss

# tfr

M 37

? tttt

w*/

exr

"rey

i/tJt

.y/s/*

* v/^

/z^y

^r^

" '

(tfne

cutti

ng to

off

ice)

'

MS

DAYS

FE

D

Geo

phys

ical

pe

rdaim

—F

.lpc

trnm

agnp

tic

lude

s sj

+i

— M

agnptn

rpptp

r 7^^

O P

*9

s\

each

— O

thpr

O

*/.

*

On

K G

pnln

cric

al

Hen

rhpnii

cal

AIR

BO

RN

E C

RE

DIT

S (

Spec

ial p

rovi

sion

cred

its d

o no

t app

ly to

airb

orne

surv

eys)

F.l

pct

rnm

acm

etir

R

adin

rnp

tric

(ent

er d

ays p

er cl

aim)

DA

T*,

S

fi

fC.'aV

Sir

-NA

TIl

BF

, X

^X

^^75^

Res

. Geo

l.

Prev

ious

Sur

veys

File

No.

Ty

pe

Y——

——

—

Aut

h6r

of R

epor

t or

Age

nt

Qua

lifi

cati

ons

^ *

O/ (

? 0

Dat

e Cl

aim

Hol

der

MIN

ING

CLA

IMS

TRA

VER

SED

Li

st n

umer

ical

ly

(pre

fix)

(num

ber)

3

f9S 8

3 ff.

........

........

........

.....^^

iS^/.

fe.....

........

.

QC

f;(;

......

......

.. C

.&...

......

......

.-la

f^\

**H

?lto

* ^

....................^M

^.y

^,..........................

jnj A

i r y

A IM

S T

'ftl

fSf

If space insufficie

nt, attach

list

837 (

5/7

9)

INDUCED POLARIZATION RESISTIVITY

H•^T3 rtO•-*)

E Ert nrt t-1O CL

n rt

I!rt (W

ectrode5s 5

rt1-1

1

3 v ^*a g- -3 ^ IS' 3' nD rt

(D

3

P

DH

rtD o

S'

3 a3g

Drt rt

Ô i Oc cHi rt3 3n n^ ^

oO

Q3

3o ^

GRAVITY

33a3/l^ M^-5'3jD

?

3CLo"Sr*r

n c, ert ™ pB. o s0 3 C3 rt ;w p3 3Kj ""^s-

ELECTROM AGN ETIC

•o *n g > n n tSi 3 ^ R 2. 2. JP, .g j. o B s: s

1 J Ml 1!iia.

tit•S a

r•îo'3

^

Dx' rtCL

:ransmitter

QC/3

O 0

(T

^

D3*

en3 rt

D33

rt

s. m ;3 rt

O3

MAGNETIC

WWO>3'1 f| c' g |y y S i s

i- s. B8 g R- L

E ! l5 S1 ffJ? o 5-l CL rt

J

i

P ? g1 ?

?tS •g

2. o

O

Oc zo

<W K!C/2

l

han one

ey

"Sn

da

for each

^T?o

n

OS >

S ^.N^ ^t

rt Ovi "-tS3 Ei,O -^? ELs cr.ort ^

rt P

ude

Navigat Sensor

a i

rr ra f

on and

"S-

rt n o

rtrt

O CL

iiltude erl

Additional inform

o

CCL rt•-t

CLl'

•i

J ~

Parameters measur

rt

1y"^;

OTHERS (SEISM;Type of survey ——Instrument

oDSrrwrrroO0SOwHp

?•o,nO.n•sa-

1g

1rtocS1

^

O Sf ffi W <•^ N rt. 3 P.5 ^ crq !? Cg" g, 2T 2? 2a. s- s, i 33 1 g- 1: in vi ^** ô s 2 5

1 i ?-E 2frt.

33

ri

0C3CL

n0cS

/i^~r

RADIOMETRICInstrument Corrections made

|

Survey Method —t

1^^ kj

rj

Q

fv•l '

C

SELF POTENTIAInstrument cS/i

s r

SJs.

1

:v


Ontario


The Mining Act

Instructions: — Please type or print.— If number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list.Note: — Only days credits calculated in the


— Oo not use shaded areas below.Type of Survey(s)

Claim Holder(s)

Township or Area

Prospector's Licence No.

CAddress

Survey Company Date of Survey (from Si to)7 64 n ~* 91vlo. Yr. Day Mo. l Yr.


Name end Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)


For first survey:




Man Days


Airborne Credits


Geophysicel

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other ' r,

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days per Claim

W

20

Days per Claim

Days per Claim

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)





Days Credits

NTLiInstructions

Total Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holda*if choice. Enter number of days credits per claim se, in columns at right.

Mining ClaimPrefixvS*

Number

"72.6 S S f72,Ofrt

Expend. Days Cr.


Expend. Days Cr.

Total number of mining claims covered by this ^. report of work.

Certification Verifying"fieport of Work^

^ F or Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Recorded

Date Recorded


Mining Recorder

Branch Director

l hereby certify that l have a personal and inornate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its ccrfnpletion and the annexed report is true.


-" SG fDate Certified )

1362 (81/9)

Ministryof Report of WorkResources (Geophysical, Geological,

Ontario Geochemical and Expenditures)

The Mining Act

Instructions: — Please type or print.— If number of mining claims traversed

exceeds space on this form, attach a list.Note: — Only days credits calculated in the


— Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survay(s) Township or Area

/t G&ffV 1RClaim Holder(s) Prospector's Licence No.

C-Address

V3&Survey Company Date of Survey (from Si to)

13 7 *V 17 7Pay ,ay l Mo. l Yr. Day | Mo. | Yr.


Name and Address of Author (of Geo-Technical report)


For first survey:




Man Days


Airborne Credits


Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

' Othar ^. f.

Geological

Geochemical

Geophysical

- Electromagnetic

- Magnetometer

- Radiometric

- Other

Geological

Geochemical

Electromagnetic

Magnetometer

Radiometric

Days perClaim

W

-2,0

Days per Claim

Days per Claim





Days Credits

InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.

Date lent (Signature)

Certification Verifying Report of Work

Mining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim

Prefix-S"

Number

(5 fJ0ij6

Expend. Days Cr.


Expend. Days Cr.

Total number of mining claims covered by this / report of work.

For Office Use OnlyTotal Days Cr. Recorded

Date Recorded


Mining Recorder

Branch Director

l hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.


CerttfHjd lay (Sjarjatu

1362 (81/9)

Mining Lands Section

Control Sheet

File No

TYPE OF SURVEY

MINING LANDS COMMENTS:

GEOPHYSICAL

GEOLOGICAL

GEOCHEMICAL

EXPENDITURE

Signature of Assessor

Date

1985 02 20 File: 2.7566

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources199 Larch StreetSudbury, OntarioP3E 5P9

Dear Sir:

RE: Geophysical (Magnetometer and Self Potential) Survey on Mining Claims S 593836 and S 720815-16 In the Township of Roosevelt

The Geophysical (Magnetooeter and Self Potential) Survey assessment work credits as shown on the attached statement have been approved as of the above date.

Please Inform the claim holder that these credits are available 1f he/she elects to file a MM report of work.Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management BranchWhitney Block, Rooa 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1U3 Phone:(416)965-4388

D. K1nv1g:roc

cc: Art Elliott438 High Street London, Ontario M6C 4L5

cc: Gordon T.J. Campbell 13 Hor*n Road Scarborough, Ontario MIS 2J1

End.

Ministry of Natural Resources

Ontario ,, -^

Technical Assessment Work Credits Date

1985 02 20Mining WorkN

File

2.Recorder's O.

7566Report of

Recorded Ho,der ^ ^g,^ CAMpBELL

Township or Area ROfJSEVELT TOWNSHIP

Type of survey and number of Assessment days credit per claim

Geophysical

InrlnroH pnlari7atinn days

nth.. Self Potential 20 Hay,

Section 77 (19) S** "Mining Claims Attested" column

Genlngiral day*

Genchemiral .. days

Man days O Airborne O

Special provision Cfl Ground Q

l l Credits have been reduced because of partial coverage of claims.

EH Credits have been reduced because of corrections to work dates and figures of applicant.

Mining Claim* Assessed

S 593836 720815-16

Special credits under section 77 (16) for the following mining claims

No credits have been allowed for the following mining claims

l — l not sufficiently covered by the survey l — l Insufficient technical data filed

The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credits if necessary in order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical—80; Geological — 40; Geochemical — 40; Section 77(19)—60:82B (83/6)

January 21, 1985 File: 2.7566

Art Elliott 438 High Street London, Ontario N6C 415

Dear Sir:

RE: Geophysical (Radiometric and Magnetometer) Survey on Mining Claims S 593836, et al, In the Township of Roosevelt

It Is our understanding that mining claims S 593836, S 720815-16 have recently been cancelled. If and when these claims are reinstated and you wish the assessment credits for this survey, please provide an explanation of the S.P. survey method (I.e. pots-one fixed and one moving or both moving along the traverse line).

For further Information, please contact Mr. Ray Plchette at (416)965-4888.

Yours sincerely,

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block, Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto, Ontario M7A 1U3 Phone:(416)965-4888

A. Barr:mc

cc: Mining Recorder Sudbury, Ontario


Ministryof GeotechnicalSSces R eP"'

Ontario Approval

Mining Lands Comments

File

- PL e l d a d t e s re -

To: Geophysics ^ g fi R

Comments

- C .

l l Approved Vish to see again with correctionsDate Signature J

To: Geology- Expenditures

Comments

l l Approved | | Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

To: Geochemistry

Comments

l j Approved l l Wish to see again with correctionsDate Signature

l [TO: Mining Lands Section, Room 6462, Whitney Block. (Tel: 5-1380)

1593 (81/10)

Ontario


Your file: 2.7566

Our file:


1985 01 04 RECEIVE•i V 1G85

MEMORANDUM TO:

S.E. YundtDirectorLand Management BranchRoom 6450, Whitney BlockToronto

MINING LANDS SECTION

ATTENTION: J.C. Smith, Supervisor Mining Lands Section

SUBJECT: Your Memo 1984 12 21Re: Geophysical (Radiometric S Magnetometer) Survey Mining Claims S. 593836 et al

________Roosevelt Township ————.—-———^—

Thank you for supplying me with xeroxes of "Reports of Work" received at your office in December 1984, covering the subject mining claims.

Here are copies of registered letters that I have directed to the former recorded holders.

Please pass this on to Mr. Arthur Barr of your section.


VCM/rk Attachments


itano

Your file. 2 8760

29672


1985 01 04

MEMORANDUM TO:

G.H. FergusonMining S Lands CommissionerToronto

SUBJECT: Mining Claims S. 593836 and S. 720815-16 incl,Roosevelt Township (G. 3183) District of

_________ Sudbury _________________ ____________ -

Here are xerox copies of registered letters that I have directed to the following individuals :

(a) Mr. Art Elliott, London, Ontario - File No. 28760

(b) Messers. Gordon T. J. Campbell, Agincourt , Ontario - File No^LgJLIZ. Martin Dekeyzer, St. Thomas, Ontario - File No. 29672

I am attaching an updated map (whiteprint) of Roosevelt Township (G. 3183) for your general information .


VCM/rk attachments

Of iiano

Mi'nistry'of-NaturalResources

REGISTERED MAIL

Office of the Mining Recorder Ontario Government Building 199 Larch Street, 10th Floor Sudbury. Ontario, P3E 5P9

January 3, 1985

Mr. Art EM iott 438 High Street London, Ontario N6C 4L5

Dear Mr. EI l iott:

SUBJECT: Mining Claim S.593836, Roosevelt Township (M.1081 4 G.3183) District of Sudbury

Mining Claim S.593836 is cancelled effective January 3, 1985, under Section 85-1(c) of the Mining Act; which reads:


This mining claim was under an extension Order of the Mining 4 Lands Commissioner for the performance of deficiency of work, and the filing of due proof thereof, to and including December 7, 1984.

On December 28, 1984, l received a letter from our Mining land's section (Land Management Branch) requsting a copy of the "Report of Work", that is normally filed with the Mining Recorder, covering reports and naps they had received on December 14, 1984, from the Southwestern Ontario Regional Office.

You may have completed a Geophysical (Radiometric and Magnetometer) Survey on this mining claim, but l did not receive a completed "Report of Work Form" by Monday, December 10, 1984 allowing for the mail delivery; therefore this mining claim is cancelled.

You may have submitted certain documentation through the Southwestern Office of the Ministry of Natural Resources at London, Ontario to our Toronto Office, but Section 15(1) of the Mining Act Chapter 268, R.S.O.1980 still applies.

January 3, 1985Mr. Art Ei liott

Killarney Provincial Park went into Regulation on June 7, 1983 under Ontario Regulation No.343/83. by virtue of our office not receiving a work report within the prescribed time limit. Section 76(3); the ground came open, and is now part of the Killarney Provincial Park. Section 32 of the Mining Act prohibits staking of mining claims in a Provincial Park.

Yours very truly,

V. C. Mi ller,Mining Recorder Sudbury Mining Division Telphone (705) 675-4125

VCM/ks Att'd: 2

c^.c. : E.N. Arbuckle - Espanola DistrictG.H. Ferguson - Mining S Lands Commissioner - TorontoE.A. Wright - Regional Parks - N.E. RegionJ.C. Smith - Mining Lands Section - Toronto

301124RECORDED IN THE NAME OF . ,

ART ELLIOTT

J li J I^L^'MNUV W Resources l0,^,0 The Mining Act j S. 593836LICENC

C.ADOBESS ^—~.

438 --gh Street, London, Ontario N6C 4L5

ASSESSMENT WORK CREDITS

ASSIGNED TO '1 HER CLAIM0

-Jii

OFFICE USC ONLY

DATE

ne 8/S3

J: LI./ S A-

DAYS WORK

E NO. RECEIPT NO. . DATE RECORDED

31734 H. 269690 June 8 , 1983

June 4/8 j 2:00 p.m. X

,CE DESCRIPTION OF CLAIM


Including Land Under Water

f ILE NO.

S. 593836

Assav Coupons (?) ~ -s

Order of Mininpr S Lands Commissioner extends ti'me(S.593636)

until and including December 7 , 1 984 for work. "

CANCELLED

•AN - 3 1985. - ' - - i . - - - - . - , ^.

l , " . - ' ' ' 1 ' , ; r ,.

MIMING ACT r&t^ .'" -'

\ ] A A

: ., s ,,- ^ .v.,^v ^

RECEIPT HO.

K. 515117

MO(S.tjQ)

irio

Ministry of Natural ' Resources

REGISTERED MAIL

Office of the Mining Recorder Ontario Government Building 199 Larch Street, 10th Floor Sudbury, Ontar io, P3E 5P9

January 3, 1985

Mr. Gordon T.J. Campbell 18 Moran Road Agincourt, Ontario M1S 2J1

Dear Mr. Campbel l:

SUBJECT: Mining Claims S.720815 and S.720816 Roosevelt Township ——————-(M.1081 S, G .3185) District of Sudbury^________^__



These mining claims were under an extension Order of the Mining S Lands Commissioner for the performance of deficiency of work, and the filing of due proof thereof, to and including December 14, 1984.




...12

January 3, 1985Mr. Gordon T.J. Campbe



Yours very truly,


VCM/ks Att'd: 2

E.N. Arbuckle - Espanola DistrictE. A. Wright - Regional Parks - N.E. RegionG. H. Ferguson - Mining S Lands CommissionerJ. C. Smith - Mining Lands Section

301191 o^!o R"ourc** The Mining Act S. 720815 "

GORDON7 THOMAS JOHN CAMPBELL ' C. 34201 H. 269792" June 30/83

l; 18

ASSESSMENT WORK CREDITS ASSIGNED TO OTHER CLAIMS

..-J-u

J l

e.5 ^, . DATt A^D .l*r -F STAKING r *,

Me n Rd., Agincourt , Ontario, MIS 2J1 . June 10/83 @ 12:00 noon x

DATE

ne 30/83

ne 12/8*1

- —

DAIS WOKK

ROOSEVELT TWP. (M. 1081) .

FILE NO.

S. 720815

Transfers 50% interest to Martin Dekeyzer (A. 44468) (S. 720815

Order of Mining S Lands Commissioner extends time ^( ^* 7 O O 3 T ~" '

until and including December 14 , 1984 for work.

CANCELLED ; , .JAN "3 1985 vji/^- ; - •'•"^•••--:.-- ; : : ::, l;;;^:: ' " ;

i

MINING ACT r ^^ \ -••^••-3 , ,^ \ i'N ' 1 1 *-\ :"\

i ;..,., l J , v ,Mv)\JJoO

'•: — - ' :. - . '.'':'. :

']

RECEIPT HO.

)H269792

H.3151K

m*- -^'^fcrtJS^

Qfll T Q O V^Vy RMOwn. IULA.MNU.

OUJ.JLC3C. j~, The Mining Act | S. 720816 'RECORDED IN THE NAME OF LICENCE NO. RECEIPT NO. ,, DATE RECORDED

GORDON THOMAS JOHN CAMPBELL ' C . 34201 ' H. 269792 June 30, 1983

18. Me .n Rd., Agincourt , Ontario, MIS 2J1 s June 10/83 @ 3:00 p.m. ' xx

* m t I

iiJOf Oz i-UJ

55s *

DATE

,J.une-JQZa3 — June 12/84

DArsWORK


INCLUDING LAND UNDER WATER

FILE NO

S. 720815

Transfers SO/S interest to Martin Dekeyzer (A. 44468) (S. 720815)

Order of Mining 8c Lands Commissioner extends time/fi r-i r— p. Q -i r—

until and including December 14, 1984 for work.CANCELLEDJAN "3 1985 ^^ — ' i • •-''•' •'•^••:'-:'^ -i^i^:" ' ,

MINING Aft vs^-^ i .v.;v- i ,, ; ,; 1 l A ^ |.i.-]vV

- '.' - .••' - .' : : .v;..

RECEIPT NO.

H269792

y

A.31511*

•tario


REGISTERED MAIL


January 3, 1985

Mr. Martin Dekeyzer 151 Forest Avenue St. Thomas, Ontario N5R 2J9

Dear Mr. Dekeyzer:

SUBJECT: Mining Claims S.720815 and S.720816 Roosevelt Township _______(M.1081 4 G.3183) District of Sudbury____________



These mining claims were under an extension Order of the Mining S Lands Commissioner for the performance of deficiency of work, and the filing of due proof thereof, to and including December 14, 1984.




...12

January 3, 1985Mr. Martin Dekeyzer



Yours very truly,

. \\J\-J


VCM/ks Att'd: 2

E.N. Arbuckle - Espanola DistrictE. A. Wright - Regional Parks - N.E. RegionG. H. Ferguson - Mining A Lands CommissionerJC. Smith - Mj nin

.

1984 12 21 Your File:Our File: 2.7566

Mining RecorderMinistry of Natural Resources199 Larch StreetSudbury* OntarioP3E 5P9

Dear Sir:

He received reports and naps on December 14. 1984 for a Geophysical (Radiometric and Magnetometer) Survey submitted under Special Provisions (credit for Performance and Coverage) on Mining Claims S 593836 et al In the Township of Roosevelt.

This material will be examined and assessed and a statement of assessment work credits will be Issued.

We do not have a copy of the report of work which 1s normally filed with you prior to the submission of this technical data. Please forward a copy as soon as possible.

Yours sincerely*

S.l. YundtDirectorLand Management Branch

Whitney Block* Room 6643 Queen's Park Toronto* Ontario M7A 1W3 Phone:(416)965-6918

A. Barr:se

cc; Mr. Art Elliott 438 High Street London* Ontario N6C 4L5


mag & sp sur howry creek gold prosp · 2017-01-17 · 11ie4ne0es5 2.7566 roosevelt 010 howry...

Documents