madhesi movement in nepal_ implications for india _ institute for defence studies and analyses

Upload: uditbhardwaj

Post on 14-Feb-2018

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/23/2019 Madhesi Movement in Nepal_ Implications for India _ Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses

    1/2

    9/22/2015 Madhesi Movement in Nepal: Implications for India | Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses

    http://www.idsa.in/event/MadhesiProblemandImplicationsforIndia.html 1/2

    CALENDAR

    FORTHCOMING EVENTS

    EVENT REPORTS

    KEY SPEECHES

    VIDEOS

    FELLOWS' SEMINARS

    CONFERENCES

    ROUND TABLES /

    WORKSHOPS

    BILATERALS

    Y.B. CHAVAN MEMORIAL

    LECTURE

    EMINENT PERSONS'

    LECTURE SERIES

    SPECIAL ADDRESSES

    INTERNAL SECURITY

    LECTURE SERIES

    NATIONAL STRATEGY

    LECTURE

    BOOK DISCUSSIONFORUM

    TRAINING CAPSULES

    OTHER EVENTS

    FACEBOOK

    TWITTER

    YOUTUBE

    RSS

    Home Events FORTHCOMING EVENTS

    Madhesi Movement in Nepal: Implications for India

    Nihar R NayakMay 28, 2010

    Event: Fellows' Seminar

    Dr. Nihar Nayak began by offering some basic facts about the Madhesi movement. Although there

    exist a number of versions about what the word Madhes stands for, the most popular or accepted

    version is that it refers to Madhya-desh, a region between the hills and the plains. Also known as

    Terai, Madhes region consists of twenty districts, all of which share their borders with India. Many

    Madhesis are of Indian origin and thus have strong socio-cultural ethnic linkages across the border.

    In the paper, Dr. Nayak flagged three questions: Is the Madhes issue likely to bring in deep-rooted

    conflict in Nepal? Can external forces take advantage of the situation to Indias detriment? How will

    Madhesi politics determine the future of Nepal politics and India-Nepal relations in the future?

    Over the years, Madhesis have suffered from a sense of discrimination and consequent deprivation.

    They also feel exploited and discriminated against by the upper caste Pahadi migrant communities.

    Hindi-speaking Indian Madhesis particularly feel discriminated against by the Nepali state due to the

    following factors. Firstly, Indian Madhesis, under the Citizenship Act of 1964 and the Constitution of

    1990, were debarred from citizenship certificates, due to which they could neither acquire land

    ownership nor could avail government benefits. Although the Citizenship Law was amended in

    November 2006 making it possible for people born in Nepal before 1990 and those residing there

    permanently to acquire Nepali citizenship, it has been alleged that many Madhesis and Dalits are stilldeprived of citizenship. It has also been alleged that instead of taking into consideration the

    Madhesis cultural affiliation with India, the Nepali government has adopted a discriminatory attitude

    towards this group by trying to introduce com pulsory Nepali language for both official work and as

    the medium of education in the Madhes region. Despite the fact that the Madhesi population

    constitutes nearly one-third of the Nepali population, their share at the level of gazetted level

    employees is merely 9.9 per cent. Madhesi people have also voiced concerns about the economic

    exploitation of the resource-rich Madhes region by the Nepali government. Although Madhes

    contributes 70 per cent of the agricultural production of Nepal, 65 per cent of the GDP, and 76 per

    cent of the countrys total revenue, the infrastructure in this region is considered to be much poorer

    than in the hill areas. Allegations have also been made regarding how during the monarchy, in the

    name of land reform, land belonging to Madhesi people were given away to Pahadis.

    A feeling of deprivation and exploitation made the Terai or Madhes region a hub of the pro-

    democratic movement during the 1950s and 1960s. During that time, perceiving India as anti-

    establishment and the Madhesis as Indias agents, and fearing that Indian immigrants in Terai

    might prompt India to claim it as Indian territory, the Nepali elite adopted stringent policies to curb

    the Madhesis activism. But this led to the emergence of identity-based movement in Madhes,

    particularly with the formation of two groups: the Nepal Terai Vongress led by Vedanta Jha in 1951and the Madhesi Mukti Andolan led by Raghunath Thakur in 1956. At present, numerous political

    parties and non-state actors are involved in the Madhesi cause. In this context, examples of Madhesi

    Janadhikar Forum (MJF), Terai Madhesh Loktantrik Party (TMLP), etc., can be particularly cited.

    There also exist a number of major armed groups in the Terai region, such as the Janatantrik Terai

    Mukti Morcha (JTMM), Terai Cobra, Nepal Defence Army (NDA), Nepal Janatantrik Party (NJP), and

    Chure Bhawar Ekta Samaj (CBES). Although all these forces are involved in armed revolution in

    Nepal, there seems to be a divergence in the goals each of them aspires to achieve. While JTMM

    demands the establishment of an autonomous Terai region, and Terai Cobra aspires to launch an

    armed separatist struggle for a sovereign Terai state, the objective of NDA is to form a Hindu army

    with suicide bombers to fight against religious extremism, conversion, as well as Maoists. Similarly,

    while as a royalist outfit, the NJP aspires to retain constitutional monarchy and multiparty

    democracy in Nepal, the CBES basically demands the establishment of a Chure Bhawar federal

    region in Terai and is opposed to one Madhesh one Pradesh demand.

    There are reports of internal tensions and lack of clarity on immediate demands and long term

    strategy of Madhesi groups. While the Madhes-based parties take a soft stand on the issue, the

    armed groups are demanding nothing less than sovereignty. Moreover, the Madhesi political parties

    are in a dilemma especially regarding whom to take sides with among the major parties. They

    cannot support a liberal democratic government in Kathmandu as their autonomy demand would be

    lost. They cannot really support the Maoists basically due to the prevailing fear of losing a multi-

    party democratic system in Nepal under a Maoist led government. In the meantime, due to their

    involvement in kidnapping, killing and extortion, some armed groups involved in the Madhesi cause

    are often dismissed as criminals by most Madhesis themselves. In this scenario of diffused leadership

    and objectives, the future of the Madhes cause remains uncertain.

    In his presentation, Dr. Nayak tried to draw attention to the fact that unstable Nepal, particularly

    the border regions of Terai, can provide avenues for both China and Pakistan to encourage anti-India

    elements there, through arms and fake currency trafficking, madrasas, terrorist outfits, etc.

    Reportedly, China has already extended its support to the faction of the MFJ led by Upendra Yadav.

    In recent time, the United States too has taken particular interest in the developments of Madhesi

    region. Although it has listed JTMM on the US terrorist list, it granted a visa to Upendra Yadav to

    attend the Terai Diaspora event held in Washington.

    Over the years, while treating Madhesi issue as an internal matter of Nepal which can be resolved by

    accommodating minority rights within the new Constitution, India has largely taken a stance of

    non-interference. Even then, the Pahadis often allege India of encouraging the one Madhes, onePradesh demand. According to Dr. Nayak, if such perceptions gain further ground, it would

    aggravate the prevailing anti-India sentiments in Nepal and consequently give more space to China

    and Pakistan to use Nepal as a hotbed for anti-India activities. Ironically, the Madhesis accuse India

    of neglecting the Madhesi movement. Recently, in June 2009, allegations were raised regarding

    Indias involvement in engineering divisions in the MJF. Debate has also been brewing in the Terai

    that the Madhesis have failed to take any concrete decision about their future because of Indias

    support for the liberal democratic parties opposed to ethnic-based federalism.

    Strategic Himalayas:Republican Nepal and

    External Powers

    Strategic Materials: AResource Challenge for

    India

    HOME ABOUT US EVENTS LIBRARY PUBLICATIONS MEMBERSHIP CONTACT US SEARCH

    Research Centres

    http://www.facebook.com/InstituteforDefenceStudiesAnalyseshttp://www.idsa.in/bookdiscussionforum.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/NationalStrategyLecture.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/internalsecuritylecture.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/EminentPersonsLectureSeries.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/russiacentralasiawestasiaafrica.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/bilaterals.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/SouthEastAsiaandOceaniaCentre.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/roundtables.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/conferences.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/nonmilitarythreatsenergyeconomicsecurity.htmlhttp://youtube.com/idsaindiahttp://www.idsa.in/strategictechnologiesmodellingnetassessment.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/eventreport.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/index.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/index.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/book/StrategicMaterialsIndia.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/book/StrategicMaterialsIndia.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/book/StrategicMaterialsIndia.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/book/StrategicMaterialsIndia.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/book/StrategicMaterialsIndia.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/book/StrategicMaterialsIndia.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/book/StrategicHimalayasRepublicanNepal.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/book/StrategicHimalayasRepublicanNepal.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/book/StrategicHimalayasRepublicanNepal.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/book/StrategicHimalayasRepublicanNepal.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/book/StrategicHimalayasRepublicanNepal.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/forthcomingevents.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/book/StrategicHimalayasRepublicanNepal.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/library.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/publications.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/membership.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/contactus.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/search.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/calendar.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/internalsecuritylecture.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/event/MadhesiProblemandImplicationsforIndia901e.html?q=print/5364http://www.idsa.in/book/StrategicMaterialsIndia.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/westasia.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/rss.htmlhttp://youtube.com/idsaindiahttp://www.idsa.in/southasia.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/keyspeeches.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/publications.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/nuclearandarmscontrol.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/fellowseminar.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/terrorisminternalsecurity.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/eventreport.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/NorthAmericanCentre.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/library.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/bookdiscussionforum.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/membership.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/index.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/EminentPersonsLectureSeries.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/book/StrategicHimalayasRepublicanNepal.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/chinasouth-eastasia.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/russiacentralasiawestasiaafrica.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/index.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/conferences.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/europeandeurasia.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/book/StrategicMaterialsIndia.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/otherevents.htmlhttp://www.youtube.com/idsaindiahttp://www.idsa.in/roundtables.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/forthcomingevents.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/SouthEastAsiaandOceaniaCentre.htmlhttp://www.facebook.com/InstituteforDefenceStudiesAnalyseshttp://www.idsa.in/index.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/strategictechnologiesmodellingnetassessment.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/aboutidsa.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/militaryaffairs.htmlhttp://www.facebook.com/InstituteforDefenceStudiesAnalyseshttp://www.idsa.in/rss.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/bilaterals.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/calendar.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/book/StrategicHimalayasRepublicanNepal.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/defenceeconomicsindustry.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/calendar.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/NationalStrategyLecture.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/SpecialAddress.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/nonmilitarythreatsenergyeconomicsecurity.htmlhttp://www.youtube.com/idsaindiahttp://www.idsa.in/TrainingCapsules.htmlhttps://twitter.com/IDSAIndiahttp://www.idsa.in/taxonomy/term/165.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/contactus.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/researchcentres.htmlhttps://twitter.com/IDSAIndiahttp://www.idsa.in/search.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/YBChavanMemorialLecture.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/forthcomingevents.html
  • 7/23/2019 Madhesi Movement in Nepal_ Implications for India _ Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses

    2/2

    9/22/2015 Madhesi Movement in Nepal: Implications for India | Institute for Defence Studies and Analyses

    http://www.idsa.in/event/MadhesiProblemandImplicationsforIndia.html 2/2

    According to Dr. Nayak, anti-Indianism of the Madhes movement is likely to affect Indias economic

    interests in Nepal. Frequent protests will affect Indias trade and commercial relations with Nepal. It

    will also affect Indias hydroelectric projects and the business operations of Indian investors in Nepal.

    Since the Terai is the link between India and northern Nepal, a troubled Terai may affect every

    major highway, custom point. The industrial, economic, and other fertile resources of Nepal are in

    Madhesh, helping circulate trade relationship.

    Under the prevailing circumstances, India is faced with certain difficult choices. Any constructive

    attempt by India to salvage the Terai situation through proactive involvement is likely to be

    interpreted as unnecessary intervention in the internal affairs of Nepal and upset its Pahadi

    constituency and Nepal Army. At another level, passive indifference to developments in Terai will be

    misconstrued as shirking of responsibility by observers at home as well as by the Madhesis

    themselves. India cannot possibly afford to ignore developments in Nepal and especially the

    discrimination in Terai. At present, the best approach for India seems to be to work as a positive

    facilitator to strengthen the capacity of various democratic institutions to resolve the social tensionsin Nepal in general and in Terai in particular. Given Indias leverages in Nepal, India could also make

    an earnest effort to bring all political parties together to have a dialogue on the contentious issues.

    Important points raised during the discussion of the paper:

    i. From a topographical point of view, Nepal is vulnerable to both In dia and China. Terai is notonly important for India, but also for Nepal itself. Over the years, the Nepali government hasbeen trying to make this place inhabited by people friendlier to them and people who looklike them. The sentiment behind taking such stance by the Nepali government should berespected by the Indian government.

    ii. In th is paper, more space should be devoted to analyse the impact of the Madhesi movementon India.

    iii. Indias concern about the Madhesi problem cannot be anything more than neighbourly.iv. Nepal suffers from paranoia of being encircled by India. But it does not seem to have a similar

    problem with respect to China. India has to understand this psyche among the Nepalese.v. The Madhesi problem should be studied in relation to the challenge of governance that Nepal

    is currently facing.vi. The strong sense of opportunism among Madhesi leaders makes it difficult for India to get

    involved in this movement.vii. Indian policy vis--vis Nepal since the Maoist uprising in 1997 has been to keep other players

    out of it. But this policy seems to have misfired particularly because of the involvement of somany external actors in it.

    viii. Geo-strategic importan ce of the Terai region should be analysed in the paper.ix. There is a need to mention the Jan Andolan III.x. The clash between Madhesis and Maoists in which 21 Maoists were killed should be

    mentioned.xi. Due to Madhesi identity, Maoist influence in Terai has weakened considerably. Madhesis are

    expected to become future kingmaker of Nepal. India needs to take that factor into account.xii. With th e advent of democracy, the Muslim vote bank in the Terai has become important.

    xiii. The paper needs to clarify the significant factors for the potent ial of conflict in Terai. Thosefactors are basically identified as intra-Madhesi conflict, Pahadi-Madhesi conflict, and elementsof communal violence.

    xiv. India should try to harmonize Madhesi politics. It should particularly take interest in briningabout economic development in Terai region.

    xv. Indias role in brokering the 8-point agreement between th e Madhesis and the governmentshould be highlighted.

    xvi. Future of Madhesi politics should be analysed in the paper.xvii. The paper also needs to bring out ordinary Madhesi peoples perception about India.

    Report prepared by Pranamita Barua, Research Assistant, IDSA

    Copyright 2005 - 2014 IDSA. All rights reserved. Tenders RTI Resources Links RSS Feeds Site Map Terms of Use Disclaimer

    http://www.idsa.in/termsofuse.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/resources.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/notice.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/RTI.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/disclaimer.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/sitemap.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/links.htmlhttp://www.idsa.in/rss.html