macro/micro no of watersehd : ic 16,17,18water.rajasthan.gov.in/content/dam/water/watershed... ·...

Name of Watershed Project : Jodhpur XII

Macro/Micro No of Watersehd : IC 16,17,18

Gram Panchyat : Palina, Moriya

Project Area: 9900 Ha

Project Cost: Rs 1485.00 lac.

-: Submitted by :- Assistant Engineer

Project Implementing Agency Panchayat Samiti Phalodi (Jodhpur)

. frEFrfl HBft +t irf-eft"-r4 . rG. o . L, ) dta / latye_ ilA^\\ )< ll

fr**'H..qi* *"i-qfrfr +1 flfi1-6 21-s.1r o\ frqrtnPr tB-ild'3Trzr&T a} e+eq&If,r n eilqifu-d s\ {i I gi{ t-d-fr fr Frqfr-fud sq-sqq gq

oTErf,rfr qq sqRarfr Et t

1. +ft qrfiqed tftqrd, sTqeT I

2. * RTqRrq cffd sfiq t

3. sm qlqtaT fuq\-g qrflrl I

etffiwt:-1. sqfutqm qTqrhqrf, qrqf, ER ftrmn Eft ffiT], truf lz. * GTfud qlq1, sqfrt{rf, 'ft1qlfu6 ;qrq W eTffif,r frqriT I

3 fi Erd-fii frra, eiflffi otfurf,r (T-FsrEH) {trfr{ fua xsN

4. SHfr rrqgt fhrer, fuf,T frr&n sTfufiI-fr/qTo I

t-eo s.Nr+T mq {d tilfi e1 qleffir Tgf, frt 'li r sqfutsrfi EE F{wR)-i EE + qEaT q q-dnlq ii aa Te ffiqTaii *1 qrt-qnlfr fr r s-*i q-E"l

o\ ea-q-rf, ?F-{FIT fo zo frnqq t rs elqw om Tfi 3lfrq-|-{ "c[|fl

qI v61

t f#qr& ',. *.,r .*- ffi .d t q\ scrsr qffi o1 rq urq qqrq-fl q

,o-.0 fuft fu-c fr"fr" ot) r Mi 1H1-{ir, nlYI+{T d ffq d-n t B-€}i

.c"* Esfi .q-rM s ft{q E-{ qzrq-n qfrfr fr 4 quo s qcrq oq &grffr m\ GrcrTf, *"* I taen fr sqfl Eqfi\ A qT{ & I5s q*(ql,

*rg* qE\qq, l5frfr fr elqa gq 11flsi of qrq 6-fiq tqi mt sEqfr E{ t

tuo.d e&qeT.d<" i frruTq qq-{ fr fumT qRq-{ *.*"r q efr3'.qrgrRT 6-dq-i tg G o-qtr GrTqflerf, is-i^tq I* rer rnl qqftrf, sTffiA m qdT i* *** tao if qfrq"fuqlq +rq-{ o\ sqRe,ro d-i t(IIKIICI {9I I

t-do t sqfu&To, qfr (fr$iltq) t eB fr.q dqgq d eR 6rffid 13qqoquT o-t TKnq .M't, d q-e-*l q s-{4 qr ft-sfl-i t-gft-ilfi fuql

qrqr$ i A-d6 t qlqrffidn gq qq ftITFT t epl. qkdN of frt]-{r dgfi A fru" *q qo* 31-5_qTq 1o,0ool- t q-diqx 20,000 ftd *i t(frtqq fuqr ogn frtrfl qrm6r{ rhq-qT q frq-qT d o-q t oq d q-@i 4\d1rT;fud o-q} *q g-Kilcr ssr rTrtT I

=-" tR* -, En d aftq-d 3il|-dg .I* of qcqr qq qard qpT tlrffr e\ s-d,If, qt{ri *q ur=r A r 3Tl-rfr iliron q q-{gf, @-{i tg e-ftIrq

qrR-d fuqT rrqT I

D:\New work 1-9-201 l\panchatya jache"doc

?\.

oiBymft ry{, S*l !d-{ qftfi-s{r sErrErq, fudr c3r slr6'rmS Eq$< 4- I erorro orr{rT qfi trhrg- tud #2oo$-10

qft+leqrcfi d S.fr.elrq w q-af q sry Erd Sn 6'65q,t\r\\Yr ''

erflffi GTftTfl (us). qtq "qftdurET il=# m* * 1rrr-6ur

m_ry-r$ ^rR -{- fruF t q{q-n ;=* ftt 11_12 aT 20qRd-q-qefi qfr {ffi ry d T6 t orn .r* riqr.,d Hfrfr d #i#efiqtreri d Bq-qfrfrqi (wa "uaur) rrdrr .r-i d "*. t drt fufrtRra fuq1 rrqT I - t

eT=il t srqq-qrE d-d-6 r#rlw et Tfr, I'ts_-}--

orfr.ggorffi oTkoFfrfuor qR${ dErc\ ^Nan\-gtnd,r\ r r-r1, S=,iQkn g!lQ4g;ffi3,1i q MjETTWT-<Eri, G*.gr-- r

\ A \,.dr1, )--tftif r,l^,16/ trL!^pl 3en-s"=#"i5l -,,1,u1,,

o :*t;If.EI-q,'4-rfrTF rar^-rl^ffi-_e qtffiLf,4LNnp)^W'$,ffi,

n- /qr+^-ra o.5 #qTT\tr>,;i-\

sfrfr ftrdrsilIEq sfqH fHdr qRsE of qrw sf traa, >a-sur t:m.g. iqrrd sfrfr

-12

13

2

3__1

qFIqlq

ilq

e{w,a e|r{rfl1.

9900 14852

3000 4503

3000 4504

3000 4505

6000 90003Terl&T T+Nf,T{q qrq{f, q-{g$i i

D:\N6y *o.1 1-9-201 l\panchatya jache.doc

orqfdq q'qr+a sfrft rdl-{i ( d'qfs )

qt a qfufufd

qsiqd rTFlid rd)fr d ftf,rg I.i Eflrsq 6ld6q {{f+fd o1 tao foiro rs

oz.r o) :ffi g<r iqqa 3rtqeT ia-ml{r gq sdl<=r vq or$6q qfrfr qit e+qfldr i3[q]fud q1 .r$ ffii qer.ro efiqflZ qtc fteir$.q. q'd s<q.t'qfi q+qd qEfr

Fdfi Erir qd zoog-ro 3,-d.sf,{,\q.fr. ?[f,rid frqd uMuqr dqg{ XII IC-

16,17,18 rrq {qrqo:- q}ftqr q qrq q;Tqd:- qfrm o1 S.fr.em. }f\d d rr{. fuflorqtrFr {qr oi art ea e)-a.ra ssoo to o qo anm i4s5.00 dlg ot rrd gaqfr tsr$irq{ fu+r rql ,

*#rdrqd sfifi Fa)fr

orqff,q r;rq rqFrd rff{r rqrqfl sI}fr'EdiAstila sfufufl

fiq .i-r{d qfrqr qsrqf, lrFfr q-dfi +'} q.q qq ft+itn....?-f.:.g3.y'/.... ol

s<qq * vtrdld ffi$ dl eluqerdl it eirq}fud of lr{ M sfuq qrqEvr sq-qfrfi

qfr{r 4 Td{RE 6m tr{ zoos ro efi.voq,g.fi. erfffd {fred vffi'eqr dq:q ,r,IC- 16,17,18 qrq rqqo:- qfr+ o1 $.fl.ens. nBd of T{, fusmr q{fls [email protected]

.. gnr ea +4rd sass to s eG dFkr s14.es anq or sd waqfA d c5qk=r lb'qr rturr

t14T"fl";El$as a'"' -

nols^1{rq qE€m q({ qlqtqrfl.rsEflffirI'i^,r" rclL.t /i.i].lqtl

drqfdq qrq r4l{d qlRqr qqrqo silFd Ed-fryrd74 yfufuft

apq tiqpqo qlRql qdnro sRfa rdtfi +1 qrq qqr fintq l3'99:%!l dl

s{.iq }t erqrqq iqdld 41 eltqsdT i G.rdfud 6t .T{ fulTn efuq qcrrcq sqnf{fn

t'rftq rt ffiie gM q-q 200e-i0 en{.eo1w.fi. 3rflrtd r*En cmq{r ii}"dgq -XII

IC- 16,17,18 Trq qqrq.fr:- dRqr o1 €.ff.eTR. nftf, 41 G. fus+r rwrq scsr ....?-9.....

.. grr eo et Ed a+az io q e.{ dFkr 670.05 as or qd qeqft € sr$tcc fuql rmt

htnq6Faffi*S##RS]fts

iryrua sfafs q63)S

Jodhpur XII

CHAPTER - 1

IINNTTRROODDUUCCTTIIOONN

Jodhpur XII

1.1 Introduction

In India, where a lot of water goes waste, it is important to apply the technology of Watershed management

to solve its annual problems of droughts and floods. The demand for water exceeds its supply. Conflicts sharing

water resources are on the rise. Planning and development of Watersheds calls for a rigorous understanding of the

occurrence and movement of water in the surface and sub-surface systems along with soil and nutrient losses in a

Watershed as the need arises for a proper Watershed management of that area. In a country like India, where a

lot of running water goes waste, it becomes very important to apply the technology of Watershed management to

solve its annual problems of droughts and floods.

Watershed management basically involves harmonizing the use of soil and water resources between

upstream and downstream areas within a Watershed toward the objectives of natural resource conservation,

increased agricultural productivity and a better standard of living for its inhabitants. Identifying and addressing the

significant externalities associated with Watershed is critical for these objectives to be achieved in a sustainable

manner.

In the 1980s and 1990s, agricultural scientists and planners aimed to promote rain-fed agriculture through

Watershed development. A Watershed is an area from which all water drains to a common point, making it an

interesting unit for managing water and soil resources to enhance agricultural production through water

conservation

Jodhpur XII

1.2 Philosophy of Integrated Watershed management Programme

IWM planning is a comprehensive multi-resource management planning process, involving all stakeholders

within the Watershed, who together as a group, cooperatively work towards identifying the resource issues and

concerns of the Watershed, as well as develop and implement a Watershed plan with solutions that are

environmentally, socially and economically sustainable.

In India, the IWM efforts go back to 1970. There have been many changes in the implementation strategies

during the following years. Until 1995, Watershed development projects were officially coordinated by multi-

sectoral programmes (with differing objectives) launched by the Government of India. After review in 1999 by the

Ministry of Rural Development and the Ministry of Agriculture, a common set of operational guidelines, objectives,

strategies and expenditure norms were established for Watershed development programmes in 2001. These are

implemented through programmes such as DPAP (Drought-Prone Area Programme), DDP (Desert Development

Programme) and IWDP (Integrated Watershed Development Programme).

The guidelines encourage the active involvement of non-governmental organizations, semi-governmental

institutions and private enterprises, universities and training institutions. However, concerns are being raised that

emphasis in Watershed development programmes is still firmly based on the belief that water is an infinite

resource, through development of groundwater abstraction and water harvesting techniques. IWM does not merely

imply the amalgamation of different activities to be undertaken within a hydrological unit. It also requires the

collation of relevant information so as to evaluate the cause and effect of all the proposed actions. The Watershed

is the smallest unit where the evaluation of human-induced impacts upon natural resources becomes possible.

Jodhpur XII

Therefore, although the ‘Panchayat’ remains the preferred implementation unit, the Watershed should be the

evaluation unit used in assessing impacts

1.3 Objectives of the IWMP

The main objectives of the IWMP are to restore the ecological balance by harnessing, conserving and

developing degraded natural resources such as soil, vegetative cover and water. The outcomes are prevention of

soil run-off, regeneration of natural vegetation, rain water harvesting and recharging of the ground water table.

This enables multi-cropping and the introduction of diverse agro-based activities, which help to provide sustainable

livelihoods to the people residing in the Watershed area.

1.4 Need of Watershed Development Programme

Watershed Development Programme is prioritized on the basis of thirteen parameters namely Poverty Index,

Percentage of SC/ST, Actual wages, Percentage of small and marginal farmers, Ground water status, Moisture

Index, Area under rain-fed agriculture, Drinking water situation in the area, Percentage of the degraded land,

Productivity potential of the land, Contiguity of another Watershed that has already developed/treated, Watershed

approach for plain or for hilly terrain

1.5 Criteria and weightage for selection of Watershed

State Remote Sensing Application Center, Jodhpur (SRSAC) has prepared "Watershed Atlas of Rajasthan ".

Watersheds have been delineated into macro / micro in each block. These have been prioritized on the basis of

two important parameters i) extent of availability of cultivable arable lands and ii) Drainage Density. Besides this

priority Watershed with preponderance of resource poor, SC/ST population is given importance. Willingness of

Jodhpur XII

community to participate, contribute in the programme and to take up responsibility of post project maintenance

of the created assets. Weightage given to these criteria for selection is as follows:

Table No. 1 Criteria and weightage for selection of Watershed

S.

No

.

Criteria Maximum

score Ranges & scores

i Poverty index (% of

poor to population)

10 Above 80 % (10) 80 to 50 % (7.5) 50 to 20 % (5) Below 20 %

(2.5)

ii % of SC/ ST population 10 More than 40 %

(10)

20 to 40 % (5) Less than 20 %

(3)

iii Actual wages 5 Actual wages are significantly lower

than minimum wages (5)

Actual wages are equal to or

higher than minimum wages

(0)

iv % of small and marginal farmers

10 More than 80 % (10)

50 to 80 % (5) Less than 50 % (3)

v Ground water status 5 Over exploited (5) Critical (3) Sub critical (2) Safe (0)

vi Moisture index/ DPAP/ DDP Block

15 -66.7 & below (15)

DDP Block

-33.3 to -66.6 (10)

DPAP Block

0 to -33.2 (0) Non DPAP/ DDP

Block

vii Area under rain-fed

agriculture

15 More than 90 %

(15)

80 to 90 % (10) 70 to 80% (5) Above 70 %

(Reject)

viii Drinking water 10 No source (10) Problematic village (7.5)

Partially covered (5)

Fully covered (0)

ix Degraded land 15 High – above 20 % (15)

Medium – 10 to 20 % (10)

Low- less than 10 % of TGA (5)

Jodhpur XII

x Productivity potential

of the land

15 Lands with low

production & where productivity

can be significantly

enhanced with reasonable efforts

(15)

Lands with

moderate production &

where productivity can

be enhanced with reasonable

efforts (10)

Lands with high

production & where

productivity can be marginally

enhanced with reasonable efforts

(5)

xi Contiguity to another Watershed that has

already been developed/ treated

10 Contiguous to previously treated

Watershed & contiguity within

the micro-Watersheds in the

project (10)

Contiguity within the micro-

Watersheds in the project but

non contiguous to previously

treated Watershed (5)

Neither contiguous to

previously treated Watershed nor

contiguity within the micro-

Watersheds in the project (0)

xii Watershed approach in

the plains (more than one contiguous micro-

Watersheds in the project)

15 Above 6 micro-

Watersheds in Watershed (15)

4 to 6 micro-


2 to 4 micro-


xiii Watershed approach in the hills (more than

one contiguous micro-Watersheds in the

project)

15 Above 5 micro-Watersheds in

Watershed (15)

3 to 5 micro-Watersheds in

Watershed (10)

2 to 3 micro-Watersheds in

Watershed (5)

Total 150 150 90 41 2.5

Based on these thirteen parameters a composite ranking was given to Jodhpur XII Watershed project as

given in table No. 1.1

Jodhpur XII

Total number of families under BPL is 437 which are less than 45 per cent of the total households. The

percentage of SC/ST is about 16 per cent to the total population. Rain fed agriculture forms the primary

occupation of the Watershed due to the fact that ground water is very deep and there is no source of irrigation.

More than 50 per cent of the farmers are small and marginal by nature and the actual wages earned by the labour

is more than the minimum wages.

Since the rainfall received is erratic and irregular, the moisture index is low and the area is classified under

DDP block. The Jodhpur XII Watershed falls in the continuity with other Watersheds namely Chainpura, Palina

Moriya, Munjasar & Nayabera, Watershed approach was followed taking into consideration five Watersheds

covering a total area of 9900 ha.

Table No. 1.1 Weightage of the Watershed

S.

No.

Distt Block Project

Name

No. of micro

W/s covered

Proposed

project

area

Type of

project

(Hilly /

Desert /

others)

Propo

sed

cost

Weightage under the criteria

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X XI XII Total

1 Jodhpur Phalo

di

Jodhpur

XII

IC16,17,18 9900 Desert 450 7.5 5 0 5 5 10 15 7.5 10 10 10 10 95

1.6 Project Background

Jodhpur XII project is located in Phalodi Panchayat Samiti, Jodhpur District of Rajasthan State. The project

is a Watershed of Five villages namely Chainpura, Palina, Moriya, Munjasar & Nayabera .

Jodhpur XII

The total project area of the Watershed is about 9900 ha of which 9900 ha. has been undertaken to be

treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) starting year 2009-10.

The nearest town is Phalodi which is about 25 Km from Jodhpur XII and is well connected by pucca road. The

Watershed includes area of five villages namely Chainpura, Palina, Moriya, Munjasar, Nayabera, Mohmmadan,

Rajput, Bishnoi, and SC communities are the primary inhabitants of the Watershed. The livelihood of these people

is primarily based on rain-fed agriculture, animal husbandry, wage labour, cow, goat and sheep rearing. The

project area falls under the Desert Prone area according to DoLR Classification and situated at 27o07’ N Latitude &

72o30’ E Longitude.

Table no. 2: Basic Project Information

S.

No.

Name

of

Project

Villages Area

(ha.)

Gram

Panchayats

District PIA Area

falling in

Project

(ha.)

Project

Cost Name Census Code

1 Jodhpur

XII

Chainpura, 0815000101922400 4163 Palina Jodhpur A. En. 4163 1485

lakh 2 Palina 0815000101919200 6704 Palina Jodhpur A. En. 1270

3 Moriya, 0815000101922500 3221 Moriya, Jodhpur A. En. 487

4 Munjasar 0815000101926100 2996 Moriya, Jodhpur A. En. 2298

5 Nayabera 0815000101926200 3257 Moriya, Jodhpur A. En. 1682

Jodhpur XII

Table no. 3: Watershed information

Name of the

project

Watershed to be

treated

Watershed type

Jodhpur XII 9900 ha Index Catchment

Jodhpur XII

CHAPTER – 2

PPRROOJJEECCTT

IIMMPPLLEEMMEENNTTIINNGG

AAGGEENNCCYY

Jodhpur XII

2.1 Project Implementing Agency

The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is selected by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA) for Integrated

Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) in Rajasthan. The PIA for Jodhpur XII Watershed is Assistant

Engineer Panchayat Samiti Phalodi. The PIA is a block level nodal agency responsible for smooth implementation

of Watershed project. The objectives of PIA are supervising, planning, implementing and promoting Watershed

development project and related development activities as per guide lines. The PIA has dedicated and experienced

staff:

Table no. 4 : Detail of PIA

Sr.

No. Names of project Details of PIA

1 IWMP Jodhpur XII

Designation

& Address

AEn Watershed development & soil conservation

Phalodi (Jodhpur)

Telephone 02925222103

Fax

E-mail [email protected]

Jodhpur XII

Table no. : 5 Staff at PIA level

S.

No.

Name Age Sex Designation Qualification

1 Hanuman Ram Choudhary 40 M Assistant Engineer B.E. ( Agriculture)

2 Bheru Lal 60 M WDT (Technical) Diploma in Civil Engg.

3 Vijay Singh 26 M WDT (Agriculture) B.Sc. (Ag)

4 Rajendra Bishnoi 30 M WDT (Veterinary) Diploma in Vet. Astt.

5 Indra Bishnoi 26 M WDT (Social

Science)

B.A. (Sociology.)

2.1.1 Roles and Responsibilities of WDT

1 Assist Gram Panchayat / Gram Sabha in constitution of the Watershed Committee and their

functioning.

2 Organizing and nurturing User Groups and Self - Help Group.

3 Mobilizing women to ensure that the perspectives and interests of women are adequately reflected

in the Watershed action plan.

Jodhpur XII

4 Conducting the participatory base - line surveys, training and capacity building.

5 Preparing detailed resource development plans including water and soil conservation or reclamation

etc. to promote sustainable livelihoods at household level.

6 Common property resource management and equitable sharing.

7 Preparing detailed Project Report (DPR) for the consideration of Gram sabha.

8 Undertake engineering surveys, prepare engineering drawings and cost estimates for any structures

to be built

9 Monitoring, checking, assessing, and undertaking physical verification and measurements of the

work done.

10 Facilitating the development of livelihood opportunities for the landless.

11 Maintaining project accounts.

12 Arranging physical, financial and social audit of the work undertaken.

13 Setting up suitable arrangement for post-project operation, maintenance and future development of

the assets created during the project period

2.1.2 SWOT Analysis of the PIA

Strength:

1 Dedicated and experience staffs and multidisciplinary team

2 Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, for

capacity building and technical guidance.

Jodhpur XII

3 Scientific planning in Watershed project with the help of SRSAC, Jodhpur

4 District level monitoring, coordination & cooperation committee.

5 Well establishment of PRIs for social audits.

6 Watershed Dept. have long experience in Watershed works and has won five national

productivity awards

Weakness:

1 Lack of proper supporting staff.

2 No permanent staff

3 No permanent office building.

4 Unwanted political interference.

Opportunities:

1 Sustainable livelihood generation landless and asset less.

2 Improvement of socio-economic status of poor’s.

3 Awareness generation among the illiterates through IEC activities by usage of new ICT

activities.

4 Reduction of migration rate.

5 Usage of new technologies of Watershed modeling and GPS for monitoring the Watershed

activities.

6 Over all integrated development of rural peoples

Jodhpur XII

7 Independent DWDU, PIA & Watershed committee to over all monitoring and execution of

activities.

Threats:

(1)Lack of sustainable agriculture development.

(2)Delay of releasing project fund from the higher authority.

(3)Lack of contribution and cooperation from local peoples.

(4)Low and erratic rainfall in the project area.

(5)Low literacy rate in the project area.

Jodhpur XII

CHAPTER - 3

BBAASSIICC IINNFFOORRMMAATTIIOONN

OOFF WWAATTEERRSSHHEEDD

Jodhpur XII

3.1 Geography and Geo-hydrology

3.1.1 Land use pattern

The net geographical area of Watershed is about 9900 ha out of which 0.0 % is forest area.

About 39 % of the total land is classified under wasteland of which 7 % is cultivable and rest is

uncultivable. About 59.7 % of land is under agriculture from which 72.77 % is under rain-fed and a

kharif crop is taken, 27 % of land is irrigated by tube wells.

Table no. : 6 Land use pattern

S.

No.

Name of

Village

Geographical

area

Forest

area (ha)

Land under

agri. Use

(ha)

Rain-fed

area

(ha)

Permanent

pasture

Wasteland

Cultivable

(ha)

Non

cultivable

(ha)

1 Chainpura, 4163 0 2868 2438 47 0 1295

2 Palina 6704 0 1050 920 65 0 220

3 Moriya 3221 0 441 426 12 0 46

4 Munjasar 2996 0 1868 1633 57 0 430

5 Nayabera 3257 0 1277 1232 68 0 405

Jodhpur XII

3.1.2 Soil and topography

Jodhpur XII Watershed project falls under North West Rajasthan Agro Climatic Zone. The soil

is mainly sandy loam and. The soil is brown to very dark grayish brown in surface colour. The

depth of soil is moderate to deep about 25 to 75 cm. The predominant texture of soil is loamy sand

and silt and clay. The soil fertility is very poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The soil

falls in Aridsol and Inseptisols order. The topography of the area is moderate ranging from 0-10%

slope

Table no. : 7 Soil type and topography

S.

No.

Name of Agro-

climatic zone

covers w/s area

Area in

ha

Name of villages Major soil types Topography

Type Area

1 I A 5433 Chainpura,,

Palina,

Sandy to

Loamy sand

5433 Moderate

slope

2 I A 4467 Nayabera,

Moriya, Munjasar

Sandy to

Loamy sand

4467 Moderate

slope

Jodhpur XII

Table no. : 8 Flood and drought condition

S. No. Village Flood (Incidence) Drought (Incidence)

1 Chainpura, Nil Once in three year

2 Palina Nil Once in three year

3 Moriya Nil Once in three year

4 Munjasar Nil Once in three year

5 Nayabera Nil Once in three year

Jodhpur XII

Jodhpur XII

Table no. : 9 Climatic conditions

S.

No.

Year Rainfall (mm) Temperature (degree centigrade) Highest intensity of

rainfall (mm in a

day)

Annual

Rainy days

Maximum Minimum

1 2010 420 48.5 6.3 121 33

2 2009 145 48.0 7.4 45 10

3 2008 270.2 47.5 6.1 44 16

4 2007 201 46.0 6.2 43 17

5 2006 205.5 46.5 5.8 33 18

The rainfall is scanty which has resulted in recurrent phenomenon of drought in every two to three

years. The average rainfall of this area is about 250 mm (from past five year data) with a highest intensity

of 121 mm within span of a day. This uneven distribution is leading to runoff of soil every year to the

streams resulting in silting of the village tank.

Jodhpur XII

Table no. : 10 Physiography and relief

S. No. Village Area Highest contour

level

Lowest contour

level

Level difference

Length of travel

% slope

1 Chainpura, 4163 370 360 10 4002 1.2

2 Palina 6704 368 362 6 3820 1.8

3 Moriya 3221 354 342 12 2940 3.02

4 Nayabera 2996 330 321 9 6660 2.5

5 Munjasar 3257 340 329 11 3002 3.4

Table no. : 11 Slope Detail of Watershed

S. No. Slope % Area

1 0-1 % 5430

2 1-3 % 3670

3 3-5 % 723

4 5-10 % 45

5 10-15 % 32

6 15-35 % 0

Total 9900

Jodhpur XII

Table no.: 12 Erosion status in project Area

Cause Type of erosion Area affected (ha) Run off(mm/

year)

Average soil loss

(Tonnes/ ha/ year) Water erosion

a Sheet 6845 300 9112

b Rill 54 300 230

c Gully 35 300 860

Sub-Total 10202

Wind erosion 2966 NA 2240

Total for project 9900

Project Area is affected by water erosion & wind erosion both, such that loss of soil fertility takes

place every year. Production depleting year by year. It is major problem of Watershed

3.1.3 Land and Agriculture

Lack of surface water source and very deep ground water has limited the sufficient base for irrigation

as well as drinking purpose. The average land holding is about 6.75 ha ranging from 1 to 20 ha. Lack of

irrigation source forces the majority of the farmers to migrate to ensure their livelihood. This affects

directly the demographic profile of the Watershed. The major crops cultivated by the farmers are Bajra

(Pearl millet). Some of the farmers have Tube well as source of irrigation and take up Rabi crop also. The

soil and moisture conservation measures such as earthen bunds and farm bunds in the area will help them

to take up rabi crop of Arandi and cumin in the residual moisture.

Jodhpur XII

Table no. : 13 Land ownership details

S. No. Village Total owned land (ha)

Gen OBC SC ST

No. Area No. Area No. Area No. Area

1 Chainpura, 28 832.6 506 2914.1 28 416.3 0 0

2 Palina 21 508 43 508 21 254 0 0

3 Moriya 2 48.7 43 438.3 0 0 0 0

4 Munjasar 112 919.2 224 1103.04 26 206.8 11 69

5 Nayabera 141 925.1 85 470.96 28 151.4 28 135

S. No. Village Total owned land (ha)

Type of farmer

Large Small Marginal BPL

No. Area No. Area No. Area No. Area

1 Chainpura, 28 1457 157 999.12 377 1707 188 572

2 Palina 4 444.5 24 304.8 57 520.7 22 135

3 Moriya 2 170.5 13 116.88 30 199.7 15 68

4 Munjasar 19 804.3 104 551.52 250 942.2 118 298

5 Nayabera 14 588.7 79 403.68 189 689.6 94 231

Jodhpur XII

Table No: 14 Land use & land classification

S.N.

Name of

village Micro no

Arable Land

Non arable land

(community Land)

Road/

Other

total

land

Irrigated

Un

Irrigated

fellow

Govt. Panchayat land

Ha. Ha.

DLT &

magra

Pastur

e

Nadi

Aagor

Habitat

ion

Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha. Ha.

1 Chainpura, Watershed 430 2438 2 1242 47 2 2 2 1295

2 Palina Watershed 130 920 5 150.5 65 1 1 2.5 220

3 Moriya Watershed 15 426 1.5 30 12 2 1.5 0.5 46

4 Munjasar Watershed 235 1633 3 298 57 50 20 5 430

5 Nayabera Watershed 45 1232 2 329 68 6 1 1 405

Table No: 15 Agriculture

S. No. Village Net sown area (ha)

One time Two times Three times

1 Chainpura, 2438 430 0

2 Palina 920 130 0

3 Moriya 426 15 0

4 Munjasar 1633 235 0

5 Nayabera 1232 45 0

Jodhpur XII

Table No: 16 Crop details

S.

No.

Village Net sown area (ha.) in Kharif

Bajra Gowar Moong Moth Til

1 Chainpura, 1305 620 165 250 98

2 Palina 520 190 85 65 60

3 Moriya 225 140 55 6 0

4 Munjasar 1283 182 72 53 43

5 Nayabera 854 240 64 35 39

S. No. Village Net sown area (ha.) in Rabi

Wheat Arandi Sarson Onion Garlic

1 Chainpura, 110 135 140 40 5

2 Palina 25 36 40 24 5

3 Moriya 5 0 10 0 0

4 Munjasar 35 120 65 12 3

5 Nayabera 0 12 18 11 4

Jodhpur XII

Table No: 17 Crop production

S. No. Crop production Kg per ha.

Wheat Bajra Moong Moth Onion Arandi

1 2500 1700 385 380 21000 210

3.1.4 Livestock

Majority of community in the Watershed depends on cows and buffaloes for milk. Lack of rain

reduced the fodder availability for animals in Watershed area. This leads to migration to other parts of the

country with their herds of goats and sheep. Milk production is very low and there is no dairy co operative

in the Watershed.

Table No : 18 Livestock

S.

No.

Village Cow (No.) Buffalo

(No.)

Goat (No.) Sheep

(No.)

Camel

(No.)

Other

(No.)

1 Chainpura, 265 50 2500 3000 85 10

2 Palina 500 62 1985 4555 40 12

3 Moriya 50 9 955 1040 15 10

4 Munjasar 745 112 2852 2265 45 10

5 Nayabera 235 48 675 864 28 5

Jodhpur XII

Table No: 19 Milk Production

S. No. Village Cow (ltr/annum) Buffalo (ltr/annum) Goat (ltr/annum) Total (ltr/annum)

No. Milk No. Milk No. Milk No. Milk

1 Chainpur

a, 265 159000 50 37500 2500 300000 2815 496500

2 Palina 500 300000 62 46500 1985 238200 2547 584700

3 Moriya 50 30000 9 6750 955 114600 1014 151350

4 Munjasar 745 447000 112 84000 2852 342240 3709 873240

5 Nayabera 235 141000 48 36000 675 81000 958 258000

Table No: 20 Drinking water

S. No. Village Ground water

table (Ft.)

Source of

drinking water

Availability in

months

Quality

1 Chainpura, 380 Tube well 12 Slightly Saline

2 Palina 442 Tube well 12 Slightly Saline

3 Moriya 410 Tube well 12 Slightly Saline

4 Munjasar 415 Tube well 12 Slightly Saline

5 Nayabera 425 Tube well 12 Slightly Saline

Jodhpur XII

3.2 Socio-Economic Profile

3.2.1 Demographic Status

Jodhpur XII Watershed project has a total of 1250 households with a population of 7574 (as per

base-line survey) out of which 4206 are male and 3368 female .The sex ratio is 898 female to 1000 male.

There are 437 BPL families. The average family size is 6. The literacy rate is very low i.e. 21.7 per cent;

male literacy rate is 29.7 per cent (of total male population) and female literacy rate is as low as 6.75 per

cent (of total female population). It is noticeable that only Twenty Two persons have reached up to

Secondary standard. The major castes in the Watershed are Mohmmadan, Rajput, Bishnoi, and SC

communities. Majority of population is involved in agriculture and animal husbandry.

Table No: 21 Demographic information

S. No. Village Population SC / ST population

Male Female Total Male Female Total

1 Chainpura 1850 1497 3347 94 73 167

2 Palina 245 194 439 65 43 108

3 Moriya 315 233 548 0 0 0

4 Munjasar 1531 1276 2807 165 114 279

5 Nayabera 265 168 433 45 27 72

Jodhpur XII

Table No: 22 Literacy rate

S. No. Village Literacy

Total % Male % Female %

1 Chainpura, 457 26.38 245 39.37 212 9.57

2 Palina 165 34.95 94 48.92 71 19.84

3 Moriya 127 33.54 78 42.57 49

4 Munjasar 416 25.56 234 46.47 182 8.98

5 Nayabera 168 27.39 98 42.20 70 10.52

Table No: 23 Poverty

S.

No.

Village Total

household

Total BPL

HH

% of BPL

HH

Landless HH % of Land

less HH

1 Chainpura, 560 188 33.57 8 1.43

2 Palina 115 22 19.13 0 0.00

3 Moriya 50 15 30.00 3 6.00

4 Munjasar 350 118 33.71 2 0.57

5 Nayabera 175 94 53.71 2 1.14

Jodhpur XII

3.2.2 Migration Pattern

People migrate during summer season to different parts of state and country like Jodhpur,

Bangalore, Mumbai and Pune as daily wagers and construction workers. Lack of irrigation facility,

employment and fodder availability force these people to migrate to other places.

Table No: 24 Migration details

S.

No.

Village Total

Population

Migration Migration by months Income

during

migration

Total Male Female Up to 3

months

3-6

months

>6

months

1 Chainpura 3347 134 134 0 80 35 19 1822500

2 Palina 439 25 25 0 15 5 5 354375

3 Moriya 548 23 23 0 12 8 3 318938

4 Munjasar 2807 65 65 0 42 15 8 855563

5 Nayabera 433 22 22 0 11 8 3 308813

Jodhpur XII

Table No: 25 Village infrastructures

S.

No.

Village Pucca road to

village

Schools Aangan

wadi

Post office Milk collection

centre

PHED

tube well

PHC

1 Chainpura, / Yes 3 2 0 0 3 0

2 Palina Yes 1 1 1 0 0 0

3 Moriya Yes 3 1 1 0 0 0

4 Munjasar Yes 6 2 0 1 1 0

5 Nayabera Yes 2 1 0 0 0 0

Table No: 26 Facilities / HH assets

S.

No.

Village HHs with

electricity

HHs with

safety

latrines

HHs with

phones

HHs with

vehicle

HHs

with

TV set

HHs with

LPG gas

HHs

with

fridge

HHs with

Tube Well

1 Chainpura 230 9 360 40 9 7 0 38

2 Palina 30 2 85 5 3 4 0 13

3 Moriya 10 0 20 5 2 3 0 2

4 Munjasar 175 10 240 25 4 3 0 26

5 Nayabera 20 2 130 15 3 4 0 5

Jodhpur XII

The Jodhpur XII Watershed comes under arid zone. So farmers grow crop according to the rainfall. If

they get good rainfall they generally grow high value crops like mustard, cumin, Cotton, Moong etc. In case

of low rainfall they go for Bajra. So we can say that monsoon decides cropping patterns of Jodhpur XII

Watershed.

The Jodhpur XII Watershed area has low productivity because of the following

reasons:-

i) Full dependence on monsoon

Jodhpur XII Watershed is dependent on monsoon. Water is essential input in agriculture. Due to the

absence of proper irrigation facility, most of the cultivated area depends on the uncertain monsoon.

Therefore, the success or failure of the monsoon determines the success or failure of agriculture

production. The rainfall is unreliable due to two factors: untimely and inadequate

ii) Low use of fertilizer per unit cropped area

Farmers do not use sufficient fertilizer due to lack of water, scarcity of fertilizer in market and

insufficient money for fertilizer. Many a times they don’t get fertilizer at the right time.

iii) Traditional farming methods

This also leads to low productivity. There is a lot of ignorance about the use of new farming

methods and technologies such as multiple cropping. They don’t use FYM and other input in a proper

way that is why they don’t get 100% output. So these factors contribute to low productivity.

Jodhpur XII

iv) Lack of adequate farm machinery

Even today a large number of farmers in Jodhpur XII Watershed use traditional methods of ploughing

and irrigation. They don’t have adequate machinery like seed drill, Combine harvester etc. So, old

machineries take more time in tillage practices

iv) Lack of good quality seeds and fertilizers:

Good quality seed, fertilizer and pesticide are important factor in agriculture productivity. The

use of good quality leads to higher land productivity. In Palina Moriya, however, there are two

limitations in the use of fertilizer. First these fertilizers are most useful in irrigated condition. But in Jodhpur

XII most of the land depends on rainfall, mostly farmers use nitrogenous fertilizers especially urea.

This has resulted in disproportionate use of fertilizer depleting the quality of land

v) Lack of other facilities such as storage and marketing

5-10% of agriculture product damage after harvesting due to scarcity of proper storage and proper

market for sale. So he sells to local traders at the low prices. Farmers mainly face proper means of

transportation and roads. and second problem is farmers don’t have proper storage facilities.

Jodhpur XII

Jodhpur XII

CHAPTER - 4

WWAATTEERRSSHHEEDD

AACCTTIIVVIITTIIEESS

Jodhpur XII

Watershed Activities

Watershed management as a strategy has been adopted by Government of India especially in the rain-fed

regions of semi-arid tropics. These regions are characterized by low and undependable rain, low soil fertility, poor

infrastructure development, low literacy and high incidence of migration. Several studies have identified that there

is a dire need of a systematic and scientific approach to deal with Watershed development. The common

guidelines generate a fresh and flexible framework for the next generation Watershed development.

4.1 Scientific Planning

(i) Watershed Approach

This envisages a broader vision of Geo-hydrological unit which involves treating a Watershed of micro-

Watershed. The Jodhpur XII Watershed project consists of five village. Further Jodhpur XII Watershed project is in

continuation with other Watersheds namely Moriya (DDP), Palinal (DDP) projects, this gives an element of

continuation of the programme.

(ii) Base line survey

To access the impact of any Watershed development programme a detailed base line survey has to be

conducted. This acts a benchmark for any intervention during and post implementation of any development

programme. A detailed base line survey was undertaken by WDT which involved household census survey, Bio-

physical survey and village level data collection. Household census survey includes a detailed questionnaire which

was filled by visiting each and every household in the villages. This gave in the details of the demographic profile

of the village, the literacy percentage, SC/ST population, number of BPL household, cattle population, and net

Jodhpur XII

consumption rate in the village, average milk production of the cattle and various schemes running and their

benefits.

Bio-physical survey was undertaken to identify various natural resources available in the villages. It included

the soil typology, well in the area, crop taken in the field, cropping pattern, fertilizer used and various sources of

irrigation in the field.

(iii) Participatory Rural Approach (PRA)

The past experience of Watershed has given tremendous input to focus on creating accountability of the

stakeholders towards the programme. This has created an emphasis to include all the stakeholder communities

and their local indigenous technological knowledge while planning for any activity. Participatory Rural Approach

provides a new path for planning, implementing, monitoring and post-withdrawal activities with a complete

accountability of the stakeholders. Various PRA techniques like resource mapping, social mapping and season

calendars were used to understand the physical and social orientation of the village in general and the Watershed

in specific. Various tools like matrix ranking, Venn Diagram were used to identify various local vegetations, fodder

crops, various institution and their significance in the life of farmers.

(iv) Use of GIS and Remote sensing for planning

Use of various high science tools has been promoted at various stages of Watershed development.

(A) Prioritization

Geographical Information System (GIS) has been used for prioritization process. Various parameters were taken

into account like Geo-morphological, Soil, BPL population, Ground water status, Drinking water situation and Slope

percent. These were all given proper weightage according to the DoLR specification. This helped in prioritization of

various Watershed area.

Jodhpur XII

(B) Planning

State Remote Sensing Application Centre has provided various maps like slope map, contour map, Land use land

cover map, Satellite image maps were used to identify each and every water conservation structures available in

the project area. Contour map of vertical interval of 1 meter at a scale of 1:10000 was used for identifying various

locations for soil and water conservation structures.

(C) Topographical survey of DLT

There is a good drainage line in the Watershed, so for treatment of drainage line a topographical survey was

essential. This help in selection of site for LSCD, Nallah bunding and Masonry check dams.

Table No. 27 Details of Scientific planning and Inputs in the project

S. No. Scientific criteria / inputs used Whether Scientific

criteria used

1 A. Planning

a. Watershed approach Yes

b. Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged?

If yes, mention the name of the institute

c. Baseline survey Yes

d. Hydro-geological survey Yes

e. Contour mapping Yes

f. Participatory Rural Approach (PRA) Yes

g. Remote sensing data Yes

Jodhpur XII

h. Ridge to valley treatment planning Yes

i. Online IT connectivity between -

(1) Project and DRDA cell / ZP Yes

(2) DRDA and SLNA Yes

(3) SLNA and DoLR Yes

j. Availability of GIS layers -

(1) Cadastral map

(2) Village boundaries Yes

(3) Drainage Yes

(4) Slope map Yes

(5) Land use Yes

(6) Ground water status No

(7) Watershed boundaries Yes

2 Inputs

(1) Bio- pesticides No

(2) Organic manure Yes

(3) Vermi-compost Yes

(4) Bio-fertilizer No

(5) Water saving devices Yes

(6) Mechanized tools / Implements Yes

Jodhpur XII

(7) Bio-fencing Yes

(8) Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers No

4.2 Watershed Development Approach and Strategy

The developmental strategy is two pronged- technical and social, both integrated for sustainable development

of natural resources. Social strategy is for creating awareness and capacity building of community for self-

motivation and long term commitment to the project for its sustainability. Technical strategy is for planning

designing & implementation of activities for development of natural resources

4.2.1 Social Strategy

Participatory Approach for empowerment of Community: People’s participation is the key to sustainable

Watershed development programmes.

Demand Driven Project Proposals of the community and Flexibility in choice of Technology.

Equity for Resource Poor and Women: In all Watershed development projects thrust is on improving equity

by addressing needs of all sections of community

Social Audit

Linkages of Watershed community with Panchayat Raj Institutions: An important element of long term

sustainability is to forge linkages with permanent institutions in the area. So, linkages are forged between

the Panchayats and the Watershed communities.

Jodhpur XII

4.2.2 Technical Strategy

Ridge to Valley approach

In-situ moisture conservation

Reduce Runoff velocity

Rain Water harvesting with the approach of ‘Water Budgeting

Alternate land use i. e. Horticulture, Agro forestry, Pasture development & forestry plantation based on

land capability classification.

Flexibility in choice of Technology: Taking account of the high degree of heterogeneity in the socio

economic and agro ecological conditions in rain fed areas, a high degree of flexibility is provided in the

choice of appropriate, at the Watershed level

Low cost, replicable & indigenous technologies

Jodhpur XII

4.2.3 Water Budgeting

Micro

no Area

Highest contour

Level

Lowest contour

Level

Level

difference

Travel

length Coefficient I A C

Q =

cum/sec

IC-16 5433 272 239 33 7592 0.0276 3.8 5433 0.24 136.76

IC-17 1587 276 248 28 4506 0.0276 4.8 1587 0.27 56.77

IC-18 2880 281 245 36 3570 0.0276 4.1 2880 0.2 65.18

9900 258.71

Table No. 28 Total available runoff

Micro Watershed no. 16-Jan 16-Feb 16-Mar 16-Apr 16-May 16-Jun 16-Jul 15-Aug 15-Sep

Runoff 32.58 37.85 35.8 10.23 5.28 7.47 48.5 62.8 18.2

Total available runoff 258.71

Table No. 29 Run off tapped in existing structure

S.No. Name No. Storage Capacity

i) Major Irrigation Project 0 0

ii) Medium Irrigation Project 1 30.5

iii) Form Ponds/Tanks 18 48.6

iv) Anicuts 1 25.7

Total 104.8

Jodhpur XII

Table No. 30 Balance available runoff

Total run off Net tapped Runoff

Balance Run

off

Available for Harvesting

75%

1 2 (2-1) 0.75*3

258.71 104.8 153.9 115.43

The water budgeting indicates potential for water harvesting in the area. Loose stone check dam, Masonry check

dam, Contour bunding, Dug out pond, Nallah bunding and water harvesting structure in arable land (Tanka) etc.

activities could be done.

4.3 Institution building

4.3.1 Watershed Committee (WC)

Watershed committee is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the Watershed project with

technical support of WDT. The committee is registered under society registration act 1860. The Gram Sabha

of the Gram Panchayat select the chairman of the w/s committee with the secretary who will be a paid

functionary. In Jodhpur XII Watershed two w/s committee were formed namely Chainpura Palina w/s

committee of Palina gram panchayat and Moriya Munjasar w/s committee of Moriya gram panchayat. Since

the Watershed covers area of two gram panchayat so separate w/s committee were constituted.

Jodhpur XII

Table No. 28 W/s Committee Chainpura Palina

S. No. Name Designation Sex Category Educational

Qualification

1 Ali Mohammad S/o Samir Khan President M OBC Middle

2 Chatar Singh S/o Sultan Singh Secretary M GEN Secondry

3 Nooron W/o Dosu Khan Member F OBC Illiterate

4 Mehar Din S/o Hasam Khan Member M OBC Literate

5 Sadiq Mohmad S/o Aladin Member M OBC Secondry

6 Ram Singh S/o Sujan Singh Member M GEN Middle

7 Haji Khan S/o Raja Mohmad Member M OBC Primary

8 Khinya Ram S/o Lala Ram Member M OBC Literate

9 Gajro Devi W/o Kishan Singh Member F GEN Literate

10 Bali W/o Nathu Ram Member F SC Illiterate

Jodhpur XII

Table No. 29 W/s Committee Moriya Munjasar

S. No. Name Designation Sex Category Educational

Qualification

1 Jivan Khan S/o Janu Khan President M OBC Primary

2 Himat Singh S/o Hari Singh Secretary M GEN Secondary

3 Mula Ram S/o Maga Ram Member M Primary

4 Shaitana Ram S/o Mota Ram Member M Middle

5 Kalu Ram S/o Khamu Ram Member M Primary

6 Rupa Ram S/o Puna Ram Member M Middle

7 Masturo W/o Nije Khan Member F OBC Primary

8 Badhu W/o Mula Ram Member F Literate

9 Elam Din S/o Rau Khan Member M OBC Literate

10 Nijro W/o Anda Ram Member F OBC Illiterate

Details of Bank Account :

For each water shed committee, the separate saving bank account has been opened with the name of

Sarpanch, Secretary WC and WDT member (Junior Engineer). One separate Watershed Development Fund (WDF)

account will be opened for each committee. In the WDF Account no transaction will be done only the contribution

received from beneficiaries will be deposited. The details of bank account are :

Jodhpur XII

Table No. 30

S.No.

Watershed

Committee

Account No. Bank Name

Saving A/C No. WDF A/C No.

1. Chainpura

Palina 02592191011517 OBC Bank Kheechan

2. Moriya

Munjasar 02592191011500 OBC Bank Kheechan

Table No. 31

S.no Name of the Gram Panchayat Date on which Grama Sabha

approved EPA

1. Palina 19.07.2010

2. Moriya 10.08.2010

Jodhpur XII

4.3.2 Self Help Group

Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and

thrift activities. Self Help Group initiative especially for women help uplift their livelihood, generally Self

Help Groups include landless and poor men and women.

Before formation of the SHGs during PRA activities focused group discussion (FGDs) were held with the

women, which came up with the following observations

a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit institution.

b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders

c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people.

d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.

Status of new SHG is shown in table no.33

4.3.3 User Group

User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or asset created under the programme on

a long term basis. The User Group collect user charges from their members, oversee the works and

manage the benefits.

It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have a feeling of ownership

with community spirit.

Jodhpur XII

Table No. 32 Status of SHG (New)

S No.

Name of SHG

(No. of Members)

Saving per

Month (Rs.)

Since when

saving Done by Group

Details of Saving account in Bank Amount Loan

(with date) taken from

Bank

Financial activities

if any

Details of revolving fund received from any agency

Name of Bank

A/c No. Dt.of

Opening the A/c

Agency Amount of Fund

(Rs.)

Status of Repayment

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12

1 Shri Ganesh

SHG

(10 member)

100 08.04.11 OBC

Kheechan 02592191026160

2 Shri Nagana rai

SHG

(10 member)

100 10.12.10

OBC

Kheechan 02592191026191

3 Khawaja SHG (10 member)

100 05.01.11

OBC Kheechan

02592191027921

4 Khalif SHG

(10 member) 100 08.03.11

OBC Kheechan

02592191026900

5 Rahman SHG (10 member)

100 09.09.10

OBC Kheechan

02592191027914

6

Bajrang Bali

SHG (10 member)

100 05.10.10

OBC Kheechan

02592011000585

7 Shiv SHG

(10 member) 100 15.12.10

OBC

Kheechan 02592191026177

Jodhpur XII

8 Sahodhara SHG

(10 member) 100 14.09.10

OBC

Kheechan 02592191026153

9 Chokhani SHG

(10 member) 100 02.02.11

OBC

Kheechan 02592191026184

10 Jetani SHG

(10 member) 100 01.08.10

OBC Kheechan

02592511002732

10.00 Lacs

Jodhpur XII

4.4 Physical activities to be undertaken

4.4.1 Entry Point Activity (EPA)

EPA activities are taken up under Watershed project to build a rapport with the village community at

the beginning of the project, generally, certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local

community are taken up. A group discussion was conducted with Watershed development committee

regarding the EPA activity. It was conveyed to the WC that an amount of Rs. 59.40 Lakh was allotted for

EPA activity, which was 4% of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they

felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveyed to them that only those activities can be taken

which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an

instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.

Table No. 33 Entry Point Activity (EPA)

S.

No.

Name of WC Amount

earmarked for

EPA

Entry Point Activity planned Estimated Cost

(Lakh)

1 59.4 Installation of Solar light 9.2

Rain water harvesting structure (Tanka) 34.7

Pipe line & GLR 15.5

Jodhpur XII

4.4.2 PRODUCTION MEASURES

4.4.2.1 AGRO FORESTRY

Suitable forestry plants like Khejri, Ardoo, Desi Babool, Neem, Kumtha etc. are planted on the field

boundaries to meet the fuel & fodder requirements of the farmer.

4.4.2.2 MIXED HORTICULTURE

Suitable horticulture plants like Mango, Lemon, Guava, Ber, Pomegranate, Anwala etc. are grown with

the crops, to improve the income & nutrition level of the cultivators. A water harvesting structure (Tanka)

is constructed to fulfill the water requirement of horticulture plants

4.4.2.3 CROP DEMONSTRATION

To show the quantitative and qualitative difference between traditional and improved practices/ inputs and

in order to motivate the farmers to adopt improved agricultural practices/ inputs recommended by the

Research Institutions/ Department of Agriculture, demonstrations are conducted in a small area of 0.5 ha.

Jodhpur XII

4.4.2.4 ORGANIC FARMING SYSTEM/ COMPOST PITS

Organic manure is decomposed agricultural waste and cow dung, which is applied in the field in place of

chemical fertilizers. It is cheaper, locally available and without any kind of side effect.

4.4.2.5 HOMESTEAD KITCHEN GARDENS

Emphasis is given on developing backyard gardens to meet the day to day needs of the vegetables of the

villagers.

4.4.2.6 PASTURE DEVELOPMENT

To meet the fuel, fodder, timber requirements

of the community and to increase the carrying

capacity of the degraded pastures, proper

fencing, planting and over seeding of grasses

like Dhaman, Sevan, Stylohameta is done on

Govt./Panchayat and Pasture lands.

Conservation measures are also adopted to

conserve soil and water. Contour furrows/

trenches are excavated on the contours and

pits are dug in the trenches for plantation.

Jodhpur XII

4.4.2.7 FENCING

Fencing is necessary to protect the production measures and pastures developed on non arable lands.

The fencing is designed in such a way that it intercepts runoff and conserves rain water. Different types of

fencing are as under:

1. DITCH CUM BUND (DCB)

This is most popular method of fencing. A ditch of particular cross section considering the type of the soil is

dug around the pasture area. The aim is to prevent cattle from entering the protected area. The soil so

excavated is used for construction of a bund. It can be fortified with local species of vegetation.

2. STONE WALL FENCING

Stone wall fencing is done in area where stone is locally available especially in hilly areas. The stone

wall is constructed to prevent the cattle from entering the protected area.

4.4.3 CONSERVATION MEASURES

4.4.3.1 CONTOUR CULTIVATION

Cultivation is done along the contours. This forms the mini barriers across the flow path of the runoff,

which conserves rain water in situ & check soil erosion. Effectiveness of contour cultivation varies with

Jodhpur XII

slope, crop cover and soil. It is most effective on moderate slope ranging from 1 to 5%

4.4.3.2 CONTOUR BUND/ CONTOUR VEGETATIVE HEDGE

Contour bunds are small earthen bunds constructed along the contour on the agriculture lands to

check soil erosion and conserve sufficient moisture to grow crops. These bunds are purified with locally

available vegetation like Khus, Munja, Dhaman and Stylo Hamata are raised on the bund.

4.4.3.3 V DITCH

These are constructed parallel to contour in areas of gentle slope to conserve in sito moisture and to

check velocity of run off.

4.4.3.4 STAGGERED TRENCHES

Number of rows of trenches are dug in hilly areas having steep slopes. Distance between two

trenches is kept equal to the length of a trench. Adjacent rows are staggered to reduce the maximum

length of runoff for better retention. These trenches check the velocity of runoff as well as conserve in-situ

moisture and check soil erosion.

Jodhpur XII

4.4.3.5 WATER HARVESTING STRUCTURE (TANKA)

Tanka is a covered masonry runoff storage tank

which collects runoff water from artificial

catchment constructed around it. It is also an age

old practice in the desert areas and is used for

harvesting surface runoff water for life saving

irrigation and drinking purposes.

4.4.3.6 LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM

These structures are constructed in small and

medium size gullies using locally available

stones/ boulders as dry masonry. A waste weir is

also provided to discharge the peak runoff safely

from the catchment.

Jodhpur XII

4.4.3.7 EARTHEN DAM

These are constructed in medium to large size gullies

by making earthen embankment in the nallah bed

across the drainage line duly supported by locally

available vegetation/ grass. They are provided where

separate surplus arrangement for water is available at

site.

4.4.3.8 DUG OUT POND (NADI)

It is a water harvesting structure constructed in middle to large drainage lines across the flow to store

surplus runoff . The pond is constructed near the point of use where maximum water can be stored

requiring minimum amount of earth work. The earthen bund is fortified with vegetation and waste

weir.

Jodhpur XII

4.4.3.9 MASONRY CHECK DAM

It is a weir like masonry structure constructed across the natural drain/ nallah which intercepts the

runoff from local catchment and stores it for optimum utilization. This helps in recharging of

surrounding wells. The stored water can also be used for lift or flow irrigation as well as for drinking

purposes of human and livestock population. Due to these direct and indirect benefits, masonry check

dam is in great demand in the rural areas.

Jodhpur XII

CHAPTER - 5

PPRROOPPOOSSEEDD

DDEEVVEELLOOPPMMEENNTT PPLLAANN

Name of the Project IWMP XII IC-16,17&18 Geographical Area 9900 Ha

G.P. 2 NO. Effective Area 9900 Ha

Block Phalodi IWMP Total Arable land

District. Jodhpur Date of Sanction 30.09.2009 1. Irrigated 855 Ha

Village Covered 5 NO. 2. Unirrigated 6649 Ha

Project outlay 1485 LAC Total Nonarable land

Total Area 9900 Hectare No. of SHG's formed 21 1. Pasture 249 Ha

No. of WC's formed 2 No. of UG's formed 26 2. Govt. / waste /OTHER LAND 2147 Ha

QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN

I. ADMINISTRATIVE COST 10% 148.5 148.500

1 WDT MANDEYA

2 W C SEC MANDEYA

3OFFICE EXPENSES (JEEP/STATIONARY & OTHER)

SUB TOTAL 148.50 148.50 148.50

II MONITORING 1% 14.850 14.850 14.850

III EVALUATION 1% 14.850 14.850 14.850

178.20 178.20 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 178.20

W/S PREPARATORY PHASE

IV ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY 4% 59.400 59.400

1 SOLAR LIGHT

2 WATER TANKA

3 REPAIRING OF TANKA

6 OTHER

59.40 59.40 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 59.40

VTRAININGS & CAPACITY

BUILDING 5% 74.25

1 USERS GROUP

(i) KHARIF

(ii) RABI

(iii) HORTICULTURE

(iv) PASTURE DEVELOPMENT

2 OTHERS TRAINING & CO

74.25 74.25 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 74.25

VI DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 1% 14.85 14.85 2 14.85 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 14.85

14.85 14.85 2 14.85 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 14.85

TOTAL 148.50 148.50 0 14.85 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 148.50

FIRST YEAR SECOND YEAR

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL

NAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET

CHAPTER-VIII (YEAR WISE BREAK UP)

Macro/Micro

2010-11 2011-12

Scheme/Batch

2014-15TOTAL

FIFTH YEAR

Date of Approval

of the work plan

YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF TOTAL IWMP-II

S. N.

2012-13 2013-14

THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEAR

CHAPTER V OF IWMP-XII


FIRST YEAR SECOND YEARNAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET

2010-11 2011-12 2014-15TOTAL

FIFTH YEARS. N.

2012-13 2013-14


W/S WORK PHASE

VII NRM 60% 891.00 148.50 222.75 222.75 178.20 118.80 891.00

1ARABLE CONSERVATION

WORK

(i) Earthen Bund 2460.0 13300.00 327.18 300 39.90 600 79.80 750 99.75 500 66.50 310 41.23 2460 327.18

(ii) WHS (Tanka) 310.0 80000.00 248.00 60 48.00 100 80.00 90 72.00 45 36.00 15 12.00 310 248.00

(iii) Waste weir 107.0 13000.00 13.91 15 1.95 25 3.25 35 4.55 25 3.25 7 0.91 107 13.91

(iv)Gulley Control Structure Nallah

Bunding 25.00 10000.00 2.50 2 0.20 10 1.00 10 1.00 3 0.30 0 0.00 25 2.50

(v) Khadin 33.00 500000.00 150.15 5 22.75 11 50.05 9 40.95 6 27.30 2 9.10 33 150.15

2NON ARABLE CONSERVATION

WORK 0.00

(i) V Ditch for PD 300.00 17900.00 53.70 0 0.00 250 44.75 50 8.95 0 0.00 0 0.00 300 53.70

(ii)Staggered Contour Trenches for

PD 0.00 12700.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

(iii) Dug out Pond 35.00 50000.00 17.50 2 1.00 11 5.50 13 6.50 7 3.50 2 1.00 35 17.50

(iv) WHS (Tanka) 70.00 80000.00 56.00 9 7.20 18 14.40 23 18.40 14 11.20 6 4.80 70 56.00

(v) Nallah Bunding with ww 22.00 43000.00 5.06 4 0.92 6 1.38 6 1.38 5 1.15 1 0.23 22 5.06

3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

(i) LSCD 'A' 20.00 20000.00 4.00 6 1.20 6 1.20 6 1.20 2 0.40 0 0.00 20 4.00

(ii) LSCD 'B' 20.00 18500.00 3.70 6 1.11 5 0.93 6 1.11 3 0.56 0 0.00 20 3.70

(iii) LSCD 'C' 20.00 17000.00 3.40 5 0.85 6 1.02 7 1.19 2 0.34 0 0.00 20 3.40

(iv) LSCD 'D' 20.00 15500.00 3.10 7 1.09 6 0.93 5 0.78 2 0.31 0 0.00 20 3.10

(v) LSCD 'E' 20.00 14000.00 2.80 7 0.98 5 0.70 6 0.84 2 0.28 0 0.00 20 2.80

(vi) Masonry Check Dam 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

891.00 0 127.15 0 284.91 0 258.60 0 151.09 0 69.27 0 891.00

VIIIPRODUCTION SYSTEM &

MICRO ENTERPRISES 15% 222.75

For Arable Land

1 Arable bund 0 0.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

2 Agro Forestry 6124 73.00 8.36 558 0.41 2500 1.83 4600 3.36 3300 2.41 500 0.37 11458 8.36

3Horticulture Plantation with

fencing & Tanka 310 24700.00 86.45 45 11.12 105 25.94 120 29.64 70 17.29 10 2.47 350 86.45

4Horticulture Plantation without

fencing (Orchard) 10 10000.00 25.00 25 2.50 65 6.50 75 7.50 60 6.00 25 2.50 250 25.00

5 Vermi Compost 12 36000.00 11.52 2 0.72 5 1.80 4 1.44 2 0.72 19 6.84 32 11.52

6 Crop Demonstration 200 2000.00 32.00 250 5.00 600 12.00 500 10.00 210 4.20 40 0.80 1600 32.00

7 Homested Kitchen Gerden 80 1000.00 13.95 250 2.50 400 4.00 550 5.50 140 1.40 55 0.55 1395 13.95

8 Medicinal Plants 50 3000.00 6.72 35 1.05 75 2.25 65 1.95 30 0.90 19 0.57 224 6.72

TOTAL



FIRST YEAR SECOND YEARNAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET

2010-11 2011-12 2014-15TOTAL

FIFTH YEARS. N.

2012-13 2013-14


For Non-arable Land

1 V Ditch for PD 300 2200.00 6.60 0 0.00 300 6.60 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 300 6.60

2 Staggered Contour Trenches for PD 0 900.00 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

3 Fencing of PD (by SW) 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00

4 Fencing of PD (by DCB) 20 5.36 0 0.00 20 5.36 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 20 5.36

1TOOLKIT, TRAINING &

REVOLVING FUND OF SHG

(i) KARIGER 7 26250.00 2.10 2 0.53 2 0.53 2 0.53 2 0.53 0 0.00 8 2.10

(ii) WHITEWASH & PENT 4 40500.00 2.84 1 0.41 2 0.81 1 0.41 2 0.81 1 0.41 7 2.84

(iii) TAILORING 4 67000.00 5.36 1 0.67 2 1.34 2 1.34 2 1.34 1 0.67 8 5.36

(iv) MASALA UDYOG 4 42200.00 3.80 2 0.84 2 0.84 2 0.84 2 0.84 1 0.42 9 3.80

(v) BICYCLE/MOBILE 4 34000.00 1.36 0 0.00 1 0.34 2 0.68 1 0.34 0 0.00 4 1.36

(vi) KUMAHRI UDYOG 2 22000.00 0.88 0 0.00 2 0.44 1 0.22 1 0.22 0 0.00 4 0.88

(vii) ARI TARI UDYOG 4 50000.00 1.50 0 0.00 1 0.50 0 0.00 2 1.00 0 0.00 3 1.50

2 LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT

(i.) Animal Health Camp 30 25000.00 7.00 8 1.40 8 1.40 8 1.40 8 1.40 8 1.40 40 7.00

(ii) Vaccination 0.50 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.10 0 0.50

(iii) Purchase of Bull / Pada 3 25000.00 1.00 0 0.00 2 0.50 2 0.50 0 0.00 0 0.00 4 1.00

(iv) A I 0.45 0 0.09 0 0.09 0 0.09 0 0.09 0 0.09 0 0.45

222.75 0 27.33 0 73.16 0 65.49 0 39.59 0 17.18 0 222.75

IX CONSOLIDATION PHASE 3% 44.55 44.55 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 0.00 0 26.73 0 17.82 0 44.55

GRAND TOTAL 1485.00 0 169.32 0 358.07 0 324.09 0 217.40 0 104.27 0 1485.00

TOTAL


Name of the Project IWMP XII Cluster Geographical Area 5433 Ha

G.P. Palina Palina Effective Area 5433 Ha

Block Phalodi IWMP Total Arable land Ha



Project outlay 814.95 LAC Total Nonarable land Ha




I. ADMINISTRATIVE COST 10% 81.495

1 WDT MANDEYA

2 W C SEC MANDEYA


SUB TOTAL 81.495 81.495

II MONITORING 1% 8.150 8.150 8.150

III EVALUATION 1% 8.150 8.150 8.150

97.794 97.794


IV ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY 4% 32.598

1 SOLAR LIGHT

2 WATER TANKA


6 OTHER

32.598 32.598


BUILDING 5% 40.748

1 USERS GROUP

(i) KHARIF

(ii) RABI

(iii) HORTICULTURE



40.748 40.748

VI DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 1% 8.150 8.150 1 8.150 8.150

8.150 8.150 1 8.150 8.150

TOTAL 81.495 8.150 81.495

THIRD YEAR

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL

FIRST YEAR

TOTAL

FOURTH YEAR FIFTH YEAR

Scheme/Batch

YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF WATERSHED COMMITTEE PALINA

S. N. NAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET

2010-11

Date of Approval

of the work plan

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15


Macro/Micro

W C

TOTALSECOND YEAR



THIRD YEARFIRST YEAR FOURTH YEAR FIFTH YEARS. N. NAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET

2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15TOTAL

SECOND YEAR

W/S WORK PHASE

VII NRM 60% 488.970 81.495 122.243 122.243 97.794 65.196 488.970


WORK

(i) Earthen Bund 1150 13300 152.950 150 19.950 250 33.250 350 46.550 200 26.600 200 26.600 1150 152.950

(ii) WHS (Tanka) 160 80000 128.000 35 28.000 40 32.000 40 32.000 35 28.000 10 8.000 160 128.000

(iii) Waste weir 67 13000 8.710 10 1.300 15 1.950 25 3.250 15 1.950 2 0.260 67 8.710


Bunding 16 10000 1.600 2 0.200 6 0.600 5 0.500 3 0.300 0 0.000 16 1.600

(v) Khadin 23 455000 104.650 3 13.650 8 36.400 6 27.300 4 18.200 2 9.100 23 104.650


WORK

(i) V Ditch for PD 200 17900 35.800 0.000 150 26.850 50 8.950 0.000 0 0.000 200 35.800


PD 0 12700 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(iii) Dug out Pond 20 50000 10.000 0 0.000 7 3.500 7 3.500 5 2.500 1 0.500 20 10.000

(iv) WHS (Tanka) 45 80000 36.000 5 4.000 10 8.000 15 12.000 10 8.000 5 4.000 45 36.000

(v) Nallah Bunding with ww 12 23000 2.760 2 0.460 4 0.920 3 0.690 3 0.690 0 0.000 12 2.760

3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT

(i) LSCD 'A' 10 20000 2.000 5 1.000 3 0.600 2 0.400 0 0.000 0 0.000 10 2.000

(ii) LSCD 'B' 10 18500 1.850 5 0.925 3 0.555 2 0.370 0 0.000 0 0.000 10 1.850

(iii) LSCD 'C' 10 17000 1.700 5 0.850 3 0.510 2 0.340 0 0.000 0 0.000 10 1.700

(iv) LSCD 'D' 10 15500 1.550 5 0.775 3 0.465 2 0.310 0 0.000 0 0.000 10 1.550

(v) LSCD 'E' 10 14000 1.400 5 0.700 3 0.420 2 0.280 0 0.000 0 0.000 10 1.400

(vi) Masonry Check Dam 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

488.970 71.810 146.020 136.440 86.240 48.460 488.970



For Arable Land

1 Arable bund 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

2 Agro Forestry 1458 73 1.064 58 0.042 500 0.365 600 0.438 300 0.219 0 0.000 1458 1.064


fencing & Tanka 210 24700 51.870 25 6.175 65 16.055 80 19.760 40 9.880 0 0.000 210 51.870


fencing (Orchard) 50 10000 5.000 5 0.500 15 1.500 15 1.500 10 1.000 5 0.500 50 5.000

5 Vermi Compost 22 36000 7.920 0 0.000 1 0.360 1 0.360 1 0.360 19 6.840 22 7.920

6 Crop Demonstration 1000 2000 20.000 150 3.000 400 8.000 300 6.000 150 3.000 0 0.000 1000 20.000

7 Homested Kitchen Gerden 995 1000 9.950 200 2.000 300 3.000 400 4.000 80 0.800 15 0.150 995 9.950

8 Medicinal Plants 100 3000 3.000 15 0.450 35 1.050 35 1.050 10 0.300 5 0.150 100 3.000

TOTAL




2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15TOTAL

SECOND YEAR

For Non-arable Land

1 V Ditch for PD 200 2200.000 4.400 0.000 200 4.400 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 200 4.400

2 Staggered Contour Trenches for PD 0 900.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

3 Fencing of PD (by SW) 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

4 Fencing of PD (by DCB) 10 2.681 0.000 10 2.681 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 10 2.681



(i) KARIGER 4 26250 1.050 1 0.263 1 0.263 1 0.263 1 0.263 0 0.000 4 1.050

(ii) WHITEWASH & PENT 5 40500 2.025 1 0.405 1 0.405 1 0.405 1 0.405 1 0.405 5 2.025

(iii) TAILORING 4 67000 2.680 0 0.000 1 0.670 1 0.670 1 0.670 1 0.670 4 2.680

(iv) MASALA UDYOG 6 42200 2.532 1 0.422 2 0.844 1 0.422 1 0.422 1 0.422 6 2.532

(v) BICYCLE/MOBILE 2 34000 0.680 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.340 1 0.340 0 0.000 2 0.680

(vi) KUMAHRI UDYOG 2 22000 0.440 0 0.000 1 0.220 1 0.220 0 0.000 0 0.000 2 0.440

(vii) ARI TARI UDYOG 2 50000 1.000 0 0.000 1 0.500 0 0.000 1 0.500 0 0.000 2 1.000


(i.) Animal Health Camp 20 25000 5.000 4 1.000 4 1.000 4 1.000 4 1.000 4 1.000 20 5.000

(ii) Vaccination 0.250 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0 0.250

(iii) Purchase of Bull / Pada 2 25000 0.500 0.000 1 0.250 1 0.250 0.000 0.000 2 0.500

(iv) A I 0.200 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0.040 0 0.200

122.242 14.347 41.653 36.768 19.249 10.227 122.242

IX CONSOLIDATION PHASE 3% 24.449 24.449 14.669 9.779 24.449

GRAND TOTAL 814.950 94.306 187.673 173.208 120.158 68.466 814.950

TOTAL


Name of the Project IWMP XII Cluster Geographical Area 4467 Ha

G.P. Moriya Moriya Effective Area 4467 Ha

Block Phalodi IWMP Total Arable land Ha



Project outlay 670.05 LAC Total Nonarable land Ha





1 WDT MANDEYA

2 W C SEC MANDEYA


SUB TOTAL 67.005 67.005

II MONITORING 1% 6.701 6.701 6.701

III EVALUATION 1% 6.701 6.701 6.701

80.406 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 80.406


IV ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY 4% 26.802 26.802

1 SOLAR LIGHT

2 WATER TANKA


6 OTHER

26.802 26.802


BUILDING 5% 33.503

1 USERS GROUP

(i) KHARIF

(ii) RABI

(iii) HORTICULTURE



33.503 33.503

VI DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 1% 6.701 6.701 1 6.701 6.701

6.701 6.701 1 6.701 6.701

TOTAL 67.005 6.701 67.005

THIRD YEAR

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL

FIRST YEAR

TOTAL

FOURTH YEAR FIFTH YEAR

Scheme/Batch

YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF WATERSHED COMMITTEE MORIYA


2010-11

Date of Approval

of the work plan

2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15


Macro/Micro

W C

TOTALSECOND YEAR




2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15TOTAL

SECOND YEAR

W/S WORK PHASE

VII NRM 60% 402.030 67.005 100.508 100.508 80.406 53.604 402.030


WORK

(i) Earthen Bund 1310 13300 174.230 150 19.950 350 46.550 400 53.200 300 39.900 110 14.630 1310 174.230

(ii) WHS (Tanka) 150 80000 120.000 25 20.000 60 48.000 50 40.000 10 8.000 5 4.000 150 120.000

(iii) Waste weir 40 13000 5.200 5 0.650 10 1.300 10 1.300 10 1.300 5 0.650 40 5.200


Bunding 9 10000 0.900 0 0.000 4 0.400 5 0.500 0 0.000 0 0.000 9 0.900

(v) Khadin 10 455000 45.500 2 9.100 3 13.650 3 13.650 2 9.100 0 0.000 10 45.500


WORK 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

(i) V Ditch for PD 100 17900 17.900 0.000 100 17.900 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 100 17.900


PD 0 12700 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(iii) Dug out Pond 15 50000 7.500 2 1.000 4 2.000 6 3.000 2 1.000 1 0.500 15 7.500

(iv) WHS (Tanka) 25 80000 20.000 4 3.200 8 6.400 8 6.400 4 3.200 1 0.800 25 20.000

(v) Nallah Bunding with ww 10 23000 2.300 2 0.460 2 0.460 3 0.690 2 0.460 1 0.230 10 2.300

3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

(i) LSCD 'A' 10 20000 2.000 1 0.200 3 0.600 4 0.800 2 0.400 0 0.000 10 2.000

(ii) LSCD 'B' 10 18500 1.850 1 0.185 2 0.370 4 0.740 3 0.555 0 0.000 10 1.850

(iii) LSCD 'C' 10 17000 1.700 0 0.000 3 0.510 5 0.850 2 0.340 0 0.000 10 1.700

(iv) LSCD 'D' 10 15500 1.550 2 0.310 3 0.465 3 0.465 2 0.310 0 0.000 10 1.550

(v) LSCD 'E' 10 14000 1.400 2 0.280 2 0.280 4 0.560 2 0.280 0 0.000 10 1.400

(vi) Masonry Check Dam 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

402.030 55.335 138.885 122.155 64.845 20.810 402.030



For Arable Land

1 Arable bund 0 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

2 Agro Forestry 10000 73 7.300 500 0.365 2000 1.460 4000 2.920 3000 2.190 500 0.365 10000 7.300


fencing & Tanka 140 24700 34.580 20 4.940 40 9.880 40 9.880 30 7.410 10 2.470 140 34.580


fencing (Orchard) 200 10000 20.000 20 2.000 50 5.000 60 6.000 50 5.000 20 2.000 200 20.000

5 Vermi Compost 10 36000 3.600 2 0.720 4 1.440 3 1.080 1 0.360 0 0.000 10 3.600

6 Crop Demonstration 600 2000 12.000 100 2.000 200 4.000 200 4.000 60 1.200 40 0.800 600 12.000

7 Homested Kitchen Gerden 400 1000 4.000 50 0.500 100 1.000 150 1.500 60 0.600 40 0.400 400 4.000

8 Medicinal Plants 124 3000 3.720 20 0.600 40 1.200 30 0.900 20 0.600 14 0.420 124 3.720

TOTAL




2010-11 2011-12 2012-13 2013-14 2014-15TOTAL

SECOND YEAR

For Non-arable Land

1 V Ditch for PD 100 2200.000 2.200 0.000 100 2.200 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 100 2.200

2 Staggered Contour Trenches for PD 0 900.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

3 Fencing of PD (by SW) 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

4 Fencing of PD (by DCB) 10 2.681 0.000 10 2.681 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 10 2.681



(i) KARIGER 4 26250 1.050 1 0.263 1 0.263 1 0.263 1 0.263 0 0.000 4 1.050

(ii) WHITEWASH & PENT 2 40500 0.810 0 0.000 1 0.405 0 0.000 1 0.405 0 0.000 2 0.810

(iii) TAILORING 4 67000 2.680 1 0.670 1 0.670 1 0.670 1 0.670 0 0.000 4 2.680

(iv) MASALA UDYOG 3 42200 1.266 1 0.422 0 0.000 1 0.422 1 0.422 0 0.000 3 1.266

(v) BICYCLE/MOBILE 2 34000 0.680 0 0.000 1 0.340 1 0.340 0 0.000 0 0.000 2 0.680

(vi) KUMAHRI UDYOG 2 22000 0.440 0 0.000 1 0.220 0 0.000 1 0.220 0 0.000 2 0.440

(vii) ARI TARI UDYOG 1 50000 0.500 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.500 0 0.000 1 0.500

2 LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT 0

(i.) Animal Health Camp 20 10000 2.000 4 0.400 4 0.400 4 0.400 4 0.400 4 0.400 20 2.000

(ii) Vaccination 0.250 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0 0.250

(iii) Purchase of Bull / Pada 2 25000 0.500 0 0.000 1 0.250 1 0.250 0.000 0.000 2 0.500

(iv) A I 0.250 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0.050 0 0.250

100.507 12.980 31.509 28.725 20.340 6.955 100.507


GRAND TOTAL 670.050 75.015 170.394 150.880 97.245 35.806 670.050

TOTAL


Unit RATE QTY. Amt from project

fund

Convergence fund Total Cost Beneficiary

contribution

I. ADMINISTRATIVE COST 10% 148.500 0.000 148.500 0.000

1 WDT MANDEYA 0.000 0.000 0.000

2 W C SEC MANDEYA 0.000 0.000 0.000

3OFFICE EXPENSES (JEEP/STATIONARY &

OTHER) 0.000 0.000 0.000

SUB TOTAL 148.500 0.000 148.500 0.000

II MONITORING 1% 14.850 0.000 14.850 0.000

III EVALUATION 1% 14.850 0.000 14.850 0.000

10 178.200 0.000 178.200 0.000

W/S PREPARATORY PHASE 0 0.000 0.000 0.000

IV ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY 0 4% 59.400 0.000 59.400 0.000

1 SOLAR LIGHT 0 0.000 0.000 0.000

2 WATER TANKA 0.000 0.000 0.000

3 REPAIRING OF TANKA 0.000 0.000 0.000

6 OTHER 0.000 0.000 0.000

59.400 0.000 59.400 0.000

V TRAININGS & CAPACITY BUILDING 5% 0.000 0.000 0.000

1 USERS GROUP 0.000 0.000 0.000

(i) KHARIF 0.000 0.000 0.000

(ii) RABI 0.000 0.000 0.000

(iii) HORTICULTURE 0.000 0.000 0.000

(iv) PASTURE DEVELOPMENT 0.000 0.000

2 OTHERS TRAINING & CO 0.000 0.000

74.250 0.000 74.250

VI DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 1% 14.850 0.000 14.850

14.850 0.000 14.850

W/S WORK PHASE 0.000 0.000

VII NRM 60% 891.000 397.850 1288.850

1 ARABLE CONSERVATION WORK

(i) Earthen Bund Ha. 13300 2820 327.180 47.880 375.060 30.005

(ii) WHS (Tanka) No. 80000 435 248.000 100.000 348.000 27.840

(iii) Waste weir No. 13000 137 13.910 3.900 17.810 1.425

(iv) Gulley Control Structure Nallah BundingNo. 10000 25 2.500 0.000 2.500 0.200

(v) Khadin No. 500000 41 150.150 36.400 186.550 14.924

2 NON ARABLE CONSERVATION WORK 0 0.000

(i) V Ditch for PD Ha. 17900 300 53.700 0.000 53.700 0.000

(ii) Staggered Contour Trenches for PD Ha. 12700 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

(iii) Dug out Pond No. 50000 35 17.500 0.000 17.500 0.000

ACTIVITY WISE TOTAL ABSTRACT OF COST

IWMP XII

S. N. NAME OF ACTIVITY

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL


(iv) WHS (Tanka) No. 80000 72 56.000 1.600 57.600 0.000

(v) Nallah Bunding with ww No. 43000 22 5.060 0.000 5.060 0.000

3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT 0 0.000 0.000

(i) LSCD 'A' No. 20000 20 4.000 0.000 4.000 0.000

(ii) LSCD 'B' No. 18500 20 3.700 0.000 3.700 0.000

(iii) LSCD 'C' No. 17000 20 3.400 0.000 3.400 0.000

(iv) LSCD 'D' No. 15500 20 3.100 0.000 3.100 0.000

(v) LSCD 'E' No. 14000 20 2.800 0.000 2.800 0.000

(vi) Masonry Check Dam No. 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

0 891.000 189.780 1080.780 0.000

VIIIPRODUCTION SYSTEM & MICRO

ENTERPRISES 67.500 0 0.000

For Arable Land 0 0.000 0.000

1 Arable bund Ha. 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

2 Agro Forestry No. 73 11458 8.364 0.000 8.364 2.509

3Horticulture Plantation with fencing &

Tanka No. 24700 415 86.450 17.290 103.740 31.122

4Horticulture Plantation without fencing

(Orchard) No. 10000 260 25.000 1.000 26.000 7.800

5 Vermi Compost No. 36000 32 11.520 0.000 11.520 3.456

6 Crop Demonstration No. 2000 1600 32.000 0.000 32.000 9.600

7 Homested Kitchen Gerden No. 1000 1395 13.950 0.000 13.950 4.185

8 Medicinal Plants No. 3000 224 6.720 0.000 6.720 2.016

For Non-arable Land 0 0

1 V Ditch for PD Ha. 2200 300 6.600 0.000 6.600 0.000

2 Staggered Contour Trenches for PD Ha. 900 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

3 Fencing of PD (by SW) Ha. 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000

4 Fencing of PD (by DCB) Ha. 0 20 5.362 0.000 5.362 0.000

1TOOLKIT, TRAINING & REVOLVING

FUND OF SHG

(i) KARIGER No. 26250 8 2.100 2.100 0.000

(ii) WHITEWASH & PENT No. 40500 7 2.835 0.000 2.835 0.000

(iii) TAILORING No. 67000 8 5.360 0.000 5.360 0.000

(iv) MASALA UDYOG No. 42200 9 3.798 0.000 3.798 0.000

(v) BICYCLE/MOBILE No. 34000 4 1.360 0.000 1.360 0.000

(vi) KUMAHRI UDYOG No. 22000 4 0.880 0.000 0.880 0.000

(vii) ARI TARI UDYOG No. 50000 3 1.500 0.000 1.500 0.000


(i.) Animal Health Camp No. 25000 40 7.000 0.000 7.000 0.000

(ii) Vaccination 0 0 0.500 0.000 0.500 0.000

(iii) Purchase of Bull / Pada No. 25000 4 1.000 0.000 1.000 0.000

(iv) A I 0 0 0.450 0.000 0.450 0.000

0 0 222.75 18.290 241.039 0.000

IX CONSOLIDATION PHASE 44.55 0 44.550 0.000 44.550 0.000

GRAND TOTAL 1485.00 208.070 1693.070 0.000

TOTAL

TOTAL


Name of the Project IWMP XII IC-16,17&18

G.P. 2 NO.

Block Phalodi IWMP

District. Jodhpur Date of Sanction 30.09.2009

Village Covered 5 NO.

Project outlay 1485 LAC

Total Area 9900 Hectare No. of SHG's formed 21

No. of WC's formed No. of UG's formed 26

Palina Moriya

Geographical Area 5433 4467 9900 Ha

Effective Area 5433 4467 9900 Ha

Project outlay 815 670 1485 LAC

Total Arable land Ha

1. Irrigated 560 295 855 Ha

2. Unirrigated 3358 3291 6649 Ha

Total Nonarable land Ha

1. Pasture 112 137 249 Ha2. Govt. / waste /OTHER LAND 1403 744 2147 Ha

QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN


1 WDT MANDEYA 41.580

2 W C SEC MANDEYA 26.730

3OFFICE EXPENSES (JEEP/STATIONARY &

OTHER) 80.190

SUB TOTAL 148.500 81.495 67.005 148.500

II MONITORING 1% 14.850 14.850 8.150 6.701 14.850

III EVALUATION 1% 14.850 14.850 8.150 6.701 14.850

178.200 97.794 80.406 178.200


IV ENTRY POINT ACTIVITY 4% 59.400 59.400 32.598 26.802 59.400

1 SOLAR LIGHT

2 WATER TANKA


6 OTHER

59.400 32.598 26.802 59.400

TOTAL

TOTAL

Watershed Committee Project

Palina Moriya Total

CHAPTER-V PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Macro/Micro

Scheme/Batch

Date of Approval of the

work plan

WATERSHED COMMITTEE WISE WORK PLAN OF TOTAL IWMP-II


Watershed Committee




Palina Moriya TotalS. N. NAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET

Watershed Committee

V TRAININGS & CAPACITY BUILDING 5% 74.250

1 USERS GROUP

(i) KHARIF

(ii) RABI

(iii) HORTICULTURE



74.250 40.748 33.503 74.250

VI DETAILED PROJECT REPORT 1% 14.850 14.850 8.150 6.701 14.850

14.850 14.850 0 8.150 6.701 0 14.850

TOTAL 148.500 81.495 67.005 148.500

W/S WORK PHASE

VII NRM 60% 891.000

1 ARABLE CONSERVATION WORK

(i) Earthen Bund 2460 13300 327.180 1150 152.95 1310 174.230 1150 327.180

(ii) WHS (Tanka) 310 80000 248.000 160 128.00 150 120.000 160 248.000

(iii) Waste weir 107 13000 13.910 67 8.71 40 5.200 67 13.910

(iv) Gulley Control Structure Nallah Bunding 25 10000 2.500 16 1.60 9 0.900 16 2.500

(v) Farm Pond 33 500000 150.150 23 104.65 10 45.500 23 150.150

2 NON ARABLE CONSERVATION WORK 0

(i) V Ditch for PD 300 17900 53.700 200 35.800 100 17.900 200 53.700

(ii) Staggered Contour Trenches for PD 0 12700 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(iii) Dug out Pond 35 50000 17.500 20 10.000 15 7.500 20 17.500

(iv) WHS (Tanka) 70 80000 56.000 45 36.000 25 20.000 45 56.000

(v) Nallah Bunding with ww 22 43000 5.060 12 2.760 10 2.300 12 5.060

3 DRAINAGE LINE TREATMENT 0 0.000

(i) LSCD 'A' 20 20000 4.000 10 2.000 10 2.000 10 4.000

(ii) LSCD 'B' 20 18500 3.700 10 1.850 10 1.850 10 3.700

(iii) LSCD 'C' 20 17000 3.400 10 1.700 10 1.700 10 3.400

(iv) LSCD 'D' 20 15500 3.100 10 1.550 10 1.550 10 3.100

(v) LSCD 'E' 20 14000 2.800 10 1.400 10 1.400 10 2.800

(vi) Masonry Check Dam 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

891.000 488.970 402.030 0 891.000TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTAL




Palina Moriya TotalS. N. NAME OF ACTIVITYTARGET

Watershed Committee

VIIIPRODUCTION SYSTEM & MICRO

ENTERPRISES 15% 222.750 0.000

For Arable Land 0.000

1 Arable bund 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

2 Agro Forestry 6124 73 8.364 1458 1.064 10000 7.300 1458 8.364

3 Horticulture Plantation with fencing &

Tanka310 24700 86.450 210 51.870 140 34.580 210 86.450

4Horticulture Plantation without fencing

(Orchard) 10 10000 25.000 50 5.000 200 20.000 50 25.000

5 Vermi Compost 12 36000 11.520 22 7.920 10 3.600 22 11.520

6 Crop Demonstration 200 2000 32.000 1000 20.000 600 12.000 1000 32.000

7 Homested Kitchen Gerden 80 1000 13.950 995 9.950 400 4.000 995 13.950

8 Medicinal Plants 50 3000 6.720 100 3.000 124 3.720 100 6.720

For Non-arable Land

1 V Ditch for PD 300 2200.000 6.600 200 4.400 100 2.200 200 6.600

2 Staggered Contour Trenches for PD 0 900.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

3 Fencing of PD (by SW) 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

4 Fencing of PD (by DCB) 20 5.362 10 2.681 10 2.681 10 5.362

1TOOLKIT, TRAINING & REVOLVING

FUND OF SHG

(i) KARIGER 7 26250 2.100 4 1.050 4 1.050 4 2.100

(ii) WHITEWASH & PENT 4 40500 2.835 5 2.025 2 0.810 5 2.835

(iii) TAILORING 4 67000 5.360 4 2.680 4 2.680 4 5.360

(iv) MASALA UDYOG 4 42200 3.798 6 2.532 3 1.266 6 3.798

(v) BICYCLE/MOBILE 4 34000 1.360 2 0.680 2 0.680 2 1.360

(vi) KUMAHRI UDYOG 2 22000 0.880 2 0.440 2 0.440 2 0.880

(vii) ARI TARI UDYOG 4 50000 1.500 2 1.000 1 0.500 2 1.500

2 LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT 0.000

(i.) Animal Health Camp 30 25000 7.000 20 5.000 20 2.000 20 7.000

(ii) Vaccination 0.500 0 0.250 0 0.250 0 0.500

(iii) Purchase of Bull / Pada 3 25000 1.000 2 0.500 2 0.500 2 1.000

(iv) A I 0.450 0 0.200 0 0.250 0 0.450

222.75 122.242 100.507 222.75


GRAND TOTAL 1485.00 814.950 670.050 1485.00

TOTAL


QTY. RATE AMOUNT PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN PHY FIN

W/S WORK PHASE

VII NRM


WORK

(i) Earthen Bund 360 13300 47.880 40.0 5.320 60 7.980 80 10.640 90 11.970 50 6.650 40 5.320 360 47.880

(ii) WHS (Tanka) 125 80000 100.000 20.0 16.000 20 16.000 30 24.000 30 24.000 20 16.000 5 4.000 125 100.000

(iii) Waste weir 30 13000 3.900 0.0 0.000 0 0.000 13 1.690 8 1.040 6 0.780 3 0.390 30 3.900


Bunding 0 10000 0.000 0.0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(v) Khadin 8 455000 36.400 1.0 4.550 2 9.100 1 4.550 2 9.100 1 4.550 1 4.550 8 36.400


WORK

(i) V Ditch for PD 0 17900 0.000 0.0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000


PD 0 12700 0.000 0.0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(iii) Dug out Pond 0 50000 0.000 0.0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(iv) WHS (Tanka) 2 80000 1.600 0.0 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.800 1 0.800 0 0.000 0 0.000 2 1.600

(v) Nallah Bunding with ww 0 23000 0.000 0.0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000


(i) LSCD 'A' 0 20000 0.000 0.0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(ii) LSCD 'B' 0 18500 0.000 0.0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(iii) LSCD 'C' 0 17000 0.000 0.0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(iv) LSCD 'D' 0 15500 0.000 0.0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(v) LSCD 'E' 0 14000 0.000 0.0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(vi) Masonry Check Dam 0 0 0.000 0.0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

0 189.780 0.000 25.870 0.000 0.000 0.000 41.680 0.000 46.910 0.000 27.980 0.000 14.260 0.000 189.780


MICRO ENTERPRISES

For Arable Land 0 0.000 0.0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

1 Arable bund 0 0 0.000 0.0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

2 Agro Forestry 0 73 0.000 0.0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000


fencing & Tanka 70 24700 17.290 5.0 1.235 5 1.235 15 3.705 10 2.470 20 4.940 15 3.705 65 17.290


fencing (Orchard) 10 10000 1.000 0.0 0.000 0 0.000 2 0.200 4 0.400 2 0.200 2 0.200 10 1.000

0 0.000 18.290 0.000 1.235 0.000 0.000 0.000 3.905 0.000 2.870 0.000 5.140 0.000 3.905 0.000 18.290

GRAND TOTAL 0 0.000 208.070 0.000 27.105 0.000 0.000 0.000 45.585 0.000 49.780 0.000 33.120 0.000 18.165 0.000 208.070

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTALFIRST YEAR SECOND YEAR THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEAR FIFTH YEAR SIXTH YEAR

YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF WATERSHED (Through Convergence)




W/S WORK PHASE

VII NRM


WORK

(i) Earthen Bund 200 13300 26.600 20 2.660 30 3.990 40 5.320 50 6.650 30 3.990 30 3.990 200 26.600

(ii) WHS (Tanka) 75 80000 60.000 10 8.000 10 8.000 20 16.000 20 16.000 10 8.000 5 4.000 75 60.000

(iii) Waste weir 20 13000 2.600 0 0.000 0 0.000 11 1.430 4 0.520 3 0.390 2 0.260 20 2.600


Bunding 0 10000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(v) Khadin 2 455000 9.100 0 0.000 1 4.550 0 0.000 1 4.550 0 0.000 0 0.000 2 9.100


WORK

(i) V Ditch for PD 0 17900 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000


PD 0 12700 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(iii) Dug out Pond 0 50000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(iv) WHS (Tanka) 0 80000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(v) Nallah Bunding with ww 0 23000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000


(i) LSCD 'A' 0 20000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(ii) LSCD 'B' 0 18500 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(iii) LSCD 'C' 0 17000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(iv) LSCD 'D' 0 15500 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(v) LSCD 'E' 0 14000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(vi) Masonry Check Dam 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

98.300 10.660 0.000 22.750 27.720 12.380 8.250 98.300


MICRO ENTERPRISES

For Arable Land

1 Arable bund 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

2 Agro Forestry 0 73 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000


fencing & Tanka 40 24700 9.880 5 1.235 5 1.235 10 2.470 5 1.235 10 2.470 5 1.235 35 9.880


fencing (Orchard) 5 10000 0.500 0.000 0.000 1 0.100 2 0.200 1 0.100 1 0.100 5 0.500

10.380 1.235 0.000 2.570 1.435 2.570 1.335 10.380

GRAND TOTAL 108.680 11.895 0.000 25.320 29.155 14.950 9.585 108.680

TOTAL

TOTAL

SECOND YEAR SIXTH YEARTOTAL

FIRST YEAR THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEAR FIFTH YEAR

YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF WATERSHED COMMITTEE PALINA (Through Convergence)




W/S WORK PHASE

VII NRM


WORK

(i) Earthen Bund 160 13300 21.280 20 2.660 30 3.990 40 5.320 40 5.320 20 2.660 10 1.330 160 21.280

(ii) WHS (Tanka) 50 80000 40.000 10 8.000 10 8.000 10 8.000 10 8.000 10 8.000 0 0.000 50 40.000

(iii) Waste weir 10 13000 1.300 0 0.000 0 0.000 2 0.260 4 0.520 3 0.390 1 0.130 10 1.300


Bunding 0 10000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(v) Khadin 6 455000 27.300 1 4.550 1 4.550 1 4.550 1 4.550 1 4.550 1 4.550 6 27.300


WORK

(i) V Ditch for PD 0 17900 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000


PD 0 12700 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(iii) Dug out Pond 0 50000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(iv) WHS (Tanka) 2 80000 1.600 0 0.000 0 0.000 1 0.800 1 0.800 0.000 0 0.000 2 1.600

(v) Nallah Bunding with ww 0 23000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000


(i) LSCD 'A' 0 20000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(ii) LSCD 'B' 0 18500 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(iii) LSCD 'C' 0 17000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(iv) LSCD 'D' 0 15500 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(v) LSCD 'E' 0 14000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

(vi) Masonry Check Dam 0 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

91.480 15.210 0.000 18.930 19.190 15.600 6.010 91.480


MICRO ENTERPRISES

For Arable Land

1 Arable bund 0 0 0.000 0.000 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000

2 Agro Forestry 0 73 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000 0 0.000


fencing & Tanka 30 24700 7.410 0 0.000 0 0.000 5 1.235 5 1.235 10 2.470 10 2.470 30 7.410


fencing (Orchard) 5 10000 0.500 0.000 0.000 1 0.100 2 0.200 1 0.100 1 0.100 5 0.500

7.910 0.000 0.000 1.335 1.435 2.570 2.570 7.910

GRAND TOTAL 99.390 15.210 0.000 20.265 20.625 18.170 8.580 99.390

TOTAL

TOTAL

TOTALFIRST YEAR SECOND YEAR THIRD YEAR FOURTH YEAR FIFTH YEAR SIXTH YEAR

YEAR WISE WORK PLAN OF WATERSHED COMMITTEE MORIYA (Through Convergence)



Jodhpur XII

CHAPTER - 8

PPRROOJJEECCTT

OOUUTTCCOOMMEESS

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

At b

egin

nin

g

Aft

er

tre

atm

en

t

At b

egin

nin

g

Aft

er

trea

tme

nt

At b

egin

nin

g

Aft

er

tre

atm

en

t

At b

egin

nin

g

Aft

er

tre

atm

en

tWheat Onion Mustard Cumin

kg/ha

Wheat At beginning

Wheat After treatment

Onion At beginning

Onion After treatment

Mustard At beginning

Mustard After treatment

Cumin At beginning

Cumin After treatment

Jodhpur XII

CHAPTER - 9

TTEECCHHNNIICCAALL DDEESSIIGGNN

&& EESSTTIIMMAATTEESS

Total Area 850 haNo. of Waste Weir 50

Name of work Conservation

Measure

Production

Measure

Total Cost

Earthen Bund 11305000 0 11305000Waste Weir 650000 0 650000.00

11955000 0 11955000.00Say 119.55 Lakh

Conservation Measure 11955000.00Production Measure 0.00

Abstract of Cost

VEGETATIVE EARTHEN BUND IN ARABLE LAND

CROSS-SECTION OF VEGETATIVE BUND IN ARABLE LAND

Top width =Based on seepage line checkSlope of seepage line 3:1

0.61.5 :1

1 :1 USDS 1

0.6

1 1.50.1 1.8 1.2 0.45 m

3.14.11 m

CS = (Tw+Bw) *Ht2

CS = 1.85 Sq.m.

Average Cross section 1.85 Sq.m.Length 1.00 m.Quantity 1.85 Cu.m.

DESIGN OF VEGETATIVE BUND IN ARABLE LAND

V.I = 0.305 (XS+Y)

0.305(0.8 x 2+1.0)

V.I = 0.549

V.I Vertical interval

X= Rain Fall Factor 0.80.8

Y= Factor due to soil infiltration & Crop cover 11

S= Percent slope 21

He= (Re x VI)1/2

(50) 1/2

He= 0.6199 Say 0.60 m

He Depth of impounding

Re 24Hour rainfall excess in Cms. for 10 year recurrence interval 35

V.I Vertical interval 0.549

Total Height of Bund = 0.6 + 0.4 1.00 m

Top width of Bund = 0.6 m

Bottom width of Bund = 3.1 m

Cross section of bund = (Top width of Bund +Bottom width of Bund) x Height

2

X Section= ( 0.60+3.1) x 1.00

2

X Section= 1.85 Sq.m.

Drawing of Waste Weir

3

SECTION AT A A'

1.5

3.3

2'

2.5

9.0 '

9.00 '

2'

1' 6"

A A'

2.5

Construction of Waste Weir

9.5

PLAN

Construction of Waste Weir

DETAILS OF WORK AND ABSTRACT OF COST

L B D/H Feet Metre Lab Total Lab Total

1 2 9.5 2 2 76

4 2 2 2 32

1 8.75 2.5 2 43.75

0

0

151.75 4.29453 cum. 92.00 92.00 395.096 395.096

2 2 9.5 2 0.5 19

4 2 2 0.5 8

1 8.75 2.5 0.5 10.938

0

0

37.938 1.07363 cum. 327.60 1576.00 351.722 1692.04

3 2 9.5 1.5 1.5 42.75

4 2 1.5 1.5 18

1 9.25 2.5 1.5 34.688

0

95.438 2.70088 cum. 473.00 1704.00 1277.52 4602.3

4 2 6 1.25 3.25 48.75

4 2 1.25 2 20

1 9.5 2 1 19

9 3

87.75 2.48333 cum. 628.30 1862.00 1560.27 4623.95

5 1 9.5 3 1 28.5

0

28.5 2.64765 Sq.m 120.50 291.00 319.042 770.466

S.

No.Item No. Detail

Excavation in hard soil dry or moist

& disposal of excavated material

within initial lead of 30 m and lift of

1.5 m including dressing etc.

complete. (2 B)

Cement concrete well mixed in

cement mortar ( 1 : 5 : 10 ) laid in

position complete including

curing.Aggregate size upto 50 mm,

HB (11 B)

Quantity Unit Rate Amount

Random rubble stone masonary in

cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 )For

foundation

Random rubble stone masonary in

cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 ) For

superstructure

Dry Stone kharanja (15 to 23 cm)

Item 100(A)

6 2 13 1.25 1 32.5

4 2 1.25 1 10

1 9.5 1.5 1 14.25

1 9.5 1 1 9.5

66.25 6.15463 sqm. 45.60 89.00 280.651 547.762

7 2 6 3.25 1 39

4 2 2 1 16 1.4864 sqm.

1 9.5 1.25 1 11.875

66.875 6.21269 sqm. 45.80 56.00 284.541 347.911

4468.84 12979.5

Rate

Skilled labour 400

Unskilled labour 135

Water A 4468.84

B 8510.69

Cement 2 C 12979.5

Cement 2 20

Total (C+D) 12999.5

Say 13000

S.

No Rate Amount

1 Sand Cu.m. 380 858.852

2 Stone Agg of 40 mm nominal size Cu.m. 350 338.194

3 Stone Cu.m. 575 3279.01

4 Cement Kg 220 2601.86 11.827 Bag

7224.07

Other (Water) 1286.62

Total 8510.69

Cement plaster including smooth

finishing in cement mortar (1:6) 20

mm thick.

Ruled pointing in cement mortar

(1:3)

Quantity Amount

6.30 2521

15.29 2064 Amount

-116 Labour

4469

Add contingency

Unit Quantity

Material

Total

2.260137

1.0

5.7

591.33

Material

3Construction of Waste Weir

CROSS SECTION AT A A'

1.5

3.25 '

1 '

2.5

9.0 '

2

1' 6"

A A'

2.5

9.5

PLAN

Estimate of One ha.

Length per ha. = 80 mtr

S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length

Width

(TW+BW)/

2 Hight Qty Unit Rate Amount

1 Earth work Excavation for making of

bund, laying in layers of 15 cm,

breaking of clods, sorting of grass

pebbles, disposal of excavated material

up to 1.5 mt Hight and lead up to 50 m

including dressing and compaction119 B 1 80 1.85 1 148.00 Cum 85 12580.0

2 Sowing of seeds on the constructed

bund in three rows

114 3 80 240 meter 0.6 144

3 Supply of Stylo/Dhaman seed @ 4 gm

/ m in three rows

CAZRI

Rate

3 80 0.96 Kg 150 144

12868.0Add 3% contingency 386.0

Total 13254.0Say 13300.0

Conservation Measure 13300.0Production Measure 0

ESTIMATE OF VEGETATIVE BUND IN ARABLE LAND

Name of Work :- Khadin

INTRODUCTION :

OBJECT :

The adventage of constructing such structure is:-

1. When rainfall is inadequate kharif can be taken

2. When rainfall is sufficient both kharif and rabi crop can be raised.

3. If the rainfall is in the latter end of the monsoon the water can be used for rabi

crops.

TECHNICAL REPORT

To conserve the moisture in the soil profile KHADIN’s are constructed as a bund across the slop on flater lands so that

runoff is spread over a larger cultivable area, this will improve soil fertility check soil erosion. While selecting the site

preference is given to the fields owned by the weaker sections of the society.

The problem can be solved upto certain extent by constructing different structures for harvesting the runoff water

which will increase the production. Construction of different structure will reduce the siol erosion and conserve the moisture in

the soil. The rabi crop can be taken by conserving the moisture in the soil. KHADIN is one of the water harvesting structure

which will reduce the soil erosion , provide labour employment in the area and increases the production by conserving the

moisture in the soil profile.

In arid and semi arid region rainfall is erratic, scanty and insuffcient for crops. In this region frequent famine conditions

prevalls which causses mass migration of humen and cattle population in search of food, fodder and water for servival.

GENERAL FEATURES :

SOIL DESCREPTION :

JUSTIFICATION :

CROPING PATTERN :

The crop can be taken in the submerged area kharif / rabi season depending on monsoon which is going to benefit the

cultivators.The major crops growing in the area are Bajra, Moong, Moth and Til etc. in kharif season. The present cropping pattern is

followed by cultivators as they have to depend upon rains. But the cropping pattern will be changed after harvesting the runoff water

in the KHADIN.

The KHADIN area is having gentle slop of 0.2% average with slop direction towards North–Eastto South – West. The cimate

of the area is hot and dry. The maximum temperature recorded in summer is 43°C to 47°C and in winter 20°C to 40°C. In summer

hot dusty winds blows in the area with high velocity. The annual rainfall is about 300mm which is low and erratic. The ground water in

the area is very deep having depth 100m to 150m.

The soils of this area are deep to very deep coarse to medium textured and are moderately to well drained. This KHADIN

area soil type is loamy - sand. After water impounding in the KHADIN area soils are likely to be converted to sandy -loam type.

The catchment area is 120 ha.which can be clasified 120 ha. average – catchment. The area do not have any problem of

salinity / alknity.

The KHADIN work has been sanctioned in Jodhpur-XII. An amount of Rs 4.55lacs as per enclosed abstract estimate is

required for this work. The estimates of KHADIN work are prepared on the basis of Gramin Kariya Nirdeshika 2011. The proposed

submergence area of the KHADIN is 8 Hact. The maximum height of the KHADIN bund as per design plan is 1.49 m.with storage

capacity of 2 X 10^4 Cum. The mandays to be generated are 6500 no.

1 Total catchment area 120 Hect.

2 Submergence area Hect.

3 Average Rainfall 12”

4 Rainfall intensity 5 cm / hr

5 Side slope U/s 2.5 : 1 D/s 1.5 : 1

6 Seepage line slope 5 :1

7 Expected runoff from the catchment area Q from strang table at 12” rainfall

where catchment is = mcft / Sqm

Q = (1.296 X 10000 X0.0393 X 120 ) / 2.589

= Cum

Lowest level of the filed boundry =

8 Capacity of the khadin upto F.T.L. it is calculated by following formula

A) V0 = H/3 (A0+A1+ v A0 X A1) Where V1 = Capicity of the area covered by the lowest

= 0.31 / 3 ( 0.00 + 2.34 + 0.00 X 2.34 ) level of the boundry & First contour

= 0.24 X10 4 H= Vertical hight (Difference between two contour) = 0.31

A0= .Area of lower leevel of the boundry = 0.00 Hact

A1= Area of 1st contour = 2.34 Hact

B) V1 = H/3 (A1+A2+ v A1 X A2) Where V1 = Capicity of the area covered by the First contour

= 0.26 / 3 ( 2.34 + 5.30 + 2.34 X 5.30 ) level & Second contour level

= 0.97 X10 4 H= Vertical hight (Difference between two contour) = 0.26

A1= .Area of the First contour = 2.34 Hact

A2= Area of the Second contour = 5.30 Hact

D E S I G N O F K H A D I N

8.22

1.296

23557

8.00

Name of Watershed :- Jodhpur-XII Panchayat Samiti :-Phalodi

KHADIN

C) V2 = H/3 (A2+A3+ v A2 X A3) Where V2 = Capicity of the area covered by the Second contour

= 0.12 / 3 ( 5.30 + 8.00 + X 8.00 ) level & Third contour level

= 0.79 X10 4 H = Vertical hight (Difference between two contour) = 0.12

A2= = .Area of the Second contour = 5.30 Hact

A3= = Area of the Third contour = 8.0 Hact

Therefore V = V0+V1+V2

V = 0.24 + 0.97 + 0.79 )X 10 4

V = 2.00 X10 4

Crossection of the Khadin bund at maximum depth of submergence

Depth of the submergence = m Depth of flow over the crest = m

Free board = 1.5 X Hw in meter Where Hw = 0.014 (df) ½

FB = 1.5 X Hw = 1.5X Depth of submergence

FB = % of slop of basin in meter

But proposed is 0.50 m df = ( / )X 100

= m

Total height of Khadin bund = m Hw = 0.014 ( ) ½

Hw =

Top width of bund = h /5 +1.5 or / 5 +1.5 = But proposed is m

Side slop U/S 2.5 :1 :1 Base width = ( X5 ) + 2.00 = m

Seepage line check –

Seepage line Width = Maximum impounding depth (up to F.T.L.)X (Seepage line slope + up stream side slop)

= X( 5.00 + 3.0 ) = 5.52

Base width > Seepage line width i.e. >

Hence design is safe

Length of pipe

The pipe (RCC) is placed at lowest level of the bund , length of pipe is required = 10.00 m

5.30

0.300.69

0.69 0.12

0.504

7.96

0.69

1.80

1.49D/S 1.5

7.96 5.52

0.336

2.00

575.00

0.336

575.00

df =

1.49

1.49

For the design of the crest lenth of the weste weir following formula is used

Q = 0.0276 C.I.A

Q = Peak rate of discharge

C = Runoff cofficient of the catchment area = 0.30

I = More intensity of rain fall during 10 years recuring interval

= 5 cm / hour

A= Catchment area = Hact.

Therefor Q = 0.0276 X C.I.A.

= 0.0276 X 0.30 X 5 X

=

Hence L = Q / (1.71 X h 3 /2 )

Q = Peak rate of discharge in Cum /mt. /sec

h = Depth of flow over the crest in mt.

L = Lenth of crest in meter

= / ( 1.71 X (0.30)3/2 )

= / 0.28

=

But Proposed is 30.00mt

W A S T E W E I R

4.96

17.71

4.96

120

120

4.96

1 Name of Village

2 Panchayat Samiti

3 District

4 Name of work

5 No of beneficiries

6 Submerged area (Hect.) 8.00 Hect.

7 Total capicity of W.H.S. 20016 Cum

8 Soil texture

9 Imperevious layer at depth

10 Average rainfall (mm)

11 Maximum rainfall (mm)

12 Flood lift

13 Cost of W.H.S.

14 Labour component

15 Material component

16 Per hect. Cost of W.H.S.

17 Employment Man days

S U M M A R Y 0 F KHADIN

386750.00

12”

5 cm/hr

0.30 m

455000.00

6

Sandy – Loam

10 m

6446

56875.00

Chainpura

Phalodi

Jodhpur

Khadin

68250.00

S. No. ITEM Qty Rate Unit Amount

1 Layout of Bund 1820.00 0.25 M. 455.00

2 Clearance of Jungle 5720.00 1.40 Sq.M. 8008.00

3 Earth work Excavation for making of bund, laying in layers of 15

cm, breaking of clods, sorting of grass pebbles, disposal of

excavated material up to 1.5 mt Hight and lead up to 50 m

including dressing and compaction

4419.53 85.00 Cu.M. 375659.88

4 P/F ISI mark RCC pipe in C:M 1:3 (300 mm dia) 10.00 600.00 M. 6000.00

5 Excavation in hard soil ordinary muram or earth mixed with bajri

and kankar or boulder dry or moist & disposal of excavated

material within initial lead of 30 m and lift of 1.5 m including

dressing etc. complete.

32.83 92.00 Cu.M. 3020.54

6 Cement concrete well mixed in cement mortar ( 1 : 4 : 8 ) laid in

position complete including curing.Aggregate size upto 50 mm,

HB

8.21 1756.00 Cu.M. 14413.25

7 Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6

)For foundation

18.12 1618.00 Cu.M. 29313.31

8 Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 )

For superstructure

3.00 1776.00 Cu.M. 5320.27

9 Cement concrete coping in 1:2:4 19.40 212.00 Sq.M. 4111.74

10 Ruled pointing in cement mortar (1:3) 10.65 56.00 Sq.M. 596.26

11 Dry stone pitching (20-23 cm) 27.26 291.00 Cu.M. 7931.21

TOTAL 454829.46

455000.00


ABSTRACT OF COST (KHADIN)

Say Rs.

KHADIN

S. No. ITEM

1 Layout of Bund X 2 = 1820.0 1820.0 M.

2 Clearance of Jungle X 6.50 = 5720.0 5720.0 Sq.M.

3 Earth work Excavation for making of bund, laying in layers of 15 cm,

breaking of clods, sorting of grass pebbles, disposal of excavated 4419.53 Cu.M.

4 P/F ISI mark RCC pipe in C:M 1:3 (300 mm dia) 10 M.

5 1 X 1.00 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 0.72

4 X 0.90 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 2.592

1 X 7.00 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 5.04

2 X 2.00 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 2.88

1 X 30.0 X 0.90 X 0.80 = 21.6

32.832 32.832 Cu.M.

6 1 X 1.00 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 0.18

4 X 0.90 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 0.648

1 X 7.00 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 1.26

2 X 2.00 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 0.72

1 X 30.0 X 0.90 X 0.20 = 5.4

8.208 8.208 Cu.M.

7 1 X 1.00 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 0.225

4 X 0.75 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 0.675

1 X 1.00 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 0.180

4 X 0.60 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 0.432

1 X 7.00 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 1.575

2 X 2.00 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 0.900

1 X 30.0 X 0.75 X 0.30 = 6.750

1 X 7.00 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 1.260

Cement concrete well mixed in cement mortar ( 1 : 4 : 8 ) laid in

position complete including curing.Aggregate size upto 50 mm, HB

Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 )For

foundation

Excavation in hard soil ordinary muram or earth mixed with bajri and

kankar or boulder dry or moist & disposal of excavated material

within initial lead of 30 m and lift of 1.5 m including dressing etc.

complete.

10M.

4419.53

910

880

DETAILS OF WORK (KHADIN)


Measurement Qty.

KHADIN

S. No. ITEM Measurement Qty.

2 X 2.00 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 0.720

1 X 30.0 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 5.400

18.117 18.117 Cu.M.

8 1 X 1.00 X 0.45 X 1.00 = 0.450

3 X 0.45 X 0.45 X 0.30 = 0.182

1 X 0.45 X 0.60 X 0.30 = 0.081

2 X 2.00 X 0.45 X 0.30 = 0.540

(7 + 2) / 2 X 0.45 X 1 = 2.025

3.278

4 X 3.14 / 4.00 X 0.3^2 = 0.283

2.996 2.996 Cu.M.

9 1 X 1.00 X 0.45 = 0.450

1 X 0.60 X 0.45 = 0.270

1 X 30.0 X 0.45 = 13.500

1 X 7.50 X 0.45 = 3.375

2 X 2.00 X 0.45 = 1.800

19.395 19.395 Sq.M.

10 2 X( 1.00 $ 0.45 )X 1.00 = 2.900

3 X( 4.00 $ 0.45 )X 0.45 = 2.430

2 X( 0.60 $ 0.45 )X 0.60 = 1.260

2 X( 2.00 $ 0.45 )X 0.30 = 0.540

1 X 7.00 X 0.30 = 2.100

(7 + 2) / 2 X 0.45 X 0.7 = 1.418

10.648 10.648 Sq.M.

11 1 X 30.0 X 2.00 X 0.23 = 13.80

1 X 10.0 X 1.80 X 0.23 = 4.14

1 X 15.0 X 2.70 X 0.23 = 9.32

27.26 27.26 Cu.M.

Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 )For

foundation

Random rubble stone masonary in cement sand mortar ( 1 : 6 ) For

superstructure

Cement concrete coping in 1:2:4

Ruled pointing in cement mortar (1:3)

Dry stone pitching (20-23 cm)

Chainage Ground Proposed Height Top width Side slop Base width Cross- Average Lenth Earth work

level T.B.L. of bund U/s D/s section C. Sec. in M in Cum

0 9.80 9.80 0.00 2.00 2.5:1 1.5:1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0

40 9.70 0.10 2.40 0.22 0.11 40 4.40

80 9.62 0.18 2.72 0.42 0.32 40 12.90

120 9.40 0.40 3.60 1.12 0.77 40 30.90

160 8.65 1.15 6.60 4.95 3.03 40 121.30

200 8.67 1.13 6.52 4.81 4.88 40 195.18

240 8.61 1.19 6.76 5.21 5.01 40 200.52

280 8.60 1.20 6.80 5.28 5.25 40 209.84

320 8.62 1.18 6.72 5.14 5.21 40 208.50

360 8.60 1.20 6.80 5.28 5.21 40 208.50

400 8.58 1.22 6.88 5.42 5.35 40 213.94

440 8.45 1.35 7.40 6.35 5.88 40 235.24

480 8.35 1.45 7.80 7.11 6.73 40 269.00

520 8.30 1.50 8.00 7.50 7.30 40 292.10

560 8.22 1.58 8.32 8.15 7.83 40 313.06

600 8.25 1.55 8.20 7.91 8.03 40 321.16

640 8.30 1.50 8.00 7.50 7.70 40 308.10

680 8.42 1.38 7.52 6.57 7.03 40 281.38

720 8.49 1.31 7.24 6.05 6.31 40 252.42

760 8.60 1.20 6.80 5.28 5.67 40 226.64

800 8.68 1.12 6.48 4.75 5.01 40 200.58

840 8.84 0.96 5.84 3.76 4.26 40 170.24

880 8.90 0.90 5.60 3.42 3.59 40 143.66

143.00 4419.53

Average base width = 6.50

KHADIN

Earth work chart


1 Cement Concrete (1:4:8) 8.208 26.27 3.69 7.39 -

2 Copping in C.C. (1:2:4) 19.395 6.05 0.43 0.87 -

3 Massonary in Cement 21.113 22.59 6.33 - 23.22

Mortar ( 1:8 )

4 Pointing in Cement 10.648 0.30 0.03 - -

Mortar ( 1:3 )

5 Dry Stone Pitching 27.255 - - - 29.98

6 R.C.C. Cement Pipe 2 Nos.

TOTAL 55.21 10.49 8.26 53.20

Say Bags 55

Stone

CumITEMS.No.

MATERIAL CONSUMPTION STATEMENT

Quantity

Cum / Sqm

Cement

Begs

Sand

Cum

Aggrigate

Cum



2.0M

0.30

0.075

0.45

ELEVATION

EARTHEN STRUCTURE

PLAN

G.L.

DRAWING OF PIPE OUTLET AT THE LOWEST POINT OF KHADIN

0.451.00 0.60

0.45

0.45

2.50

0.6

0.15

1.0

0.15

G.L.

0.9

0.15


2

U/S

2

D/S

30 M

SID

E V

IEW

PLAN

30.00

DRAWING OF SIDE WASTE-WEIR FOR LOW COSTING KHADINS

2.0

M

0.8

0.6

5.2

DESIGN OF LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM (LSCD)

Length of

Head wall

No of Lscd Per Unit Cost Total Cost

7 20000654

4454

185001700015500

800007400085000620005600035700021

140003 4

Head Wall Length = 7 m

Plan Elevation

1.5 7 1.5

0.7

0.3 0.3

0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8

GL 0.3 0.3

0.3

Pit

1.6

S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Height Qty rate amount

2B 1 7 1.6 0.3 3.4 92.0 309.1

2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5

1 7 1.6 0.3 3.4

1 7 1.3 0.3 2.7

1 7 1.0 0.3 2.1

1 7 0.7 0.3 1.5

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

18.3 1040.0 19032.0

19473.6

Add 3% Contingency 584.2

Total 20057.8

Say 20000

ESTIMATE OF LOOSE STONE CHECK DAM (LSCD)

0.6

2 Dry stone masonry

21B

Earth work Excavation in hard

soil up to 1.5 mt Height and

deposited excavated material lead

op to 150

1


Plan Elevation

1.5 6 1.5

0.7

0.3 0.3

0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8

GL 0.3 0.3

0.3

Pit

1.6


2B 1 6.0 1.6 0.3 2.9 92.0 265.0

2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5

1 6.0 1.6 0.3 2.9

1 6.0 1.3 0.3 2.3

1 6.0 1.0 0.3 1.8

1 6.0 0.7 0.3 1.3

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

16.9 1040.0 17596.8

17994.2


Total 18534.1

Say 18500


0.6

2 Dry stone masonry

21B




op to 150

1


Plan Elevation

1.5 5 1.5

0.7

0.3 0.3

0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8

GL 0.3 0.3

0.3

Pit

1.6


2B 1 5.0 1.6 0.3 2.4 92.0 220.8

2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5

1 5.0 1.6 0.3 2.4

1 5.0 1.3 0.3 2.0

1 5.0 1.0 0.3 1.5

1 5.0 0.7 0.3 1.1

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

15.5 1040.0 16161.6

16514.9


Total 17010.3

Say 17000


0.6

2 Dry stone masonry

21B




op to 150

1


Plan Elevation

1.5 4 1.5

0.7

0.3 0.3

0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8

GL 0.3 0.3

0.3

Pit

1.6


2B 1 4.0 1.6 0.3 1.9 92.0 176.6

2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5

1 4.0 1.6 0.3 1.9

1 4.0 1.3 0.3 1.6

1 4.0 1.0 0.3 1.2

1 4.0 0.7 0.3 0.8

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

14.2 1040.0 14726.4

15035.5


Total 15486.6

Say 15500


0.6

2 Dry stone masonry

21B




op to 150

1


Plan Elevation

1.5 3 1.5

0.7

0.3 0.3

0.9 0.3 0.3 1.8

GL 0.3 0.3

0.3

Pit

1.6


2B 1 3.0 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5

2B 2 1.5 1.6 0.3 1.4 92.0 132.5

1 3.0 1.6 0.3 1.4

1 3.0 1.3 0.3 1.2

1 3.0 1.0 0.3 0.9

1 3.0 0.7 0.3 0.6

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

1 1.5 1.6 1.8 4.3

12.8 1040.0 13291.2

13556.2


Total 13962.8

Say 14000


0.6

2 Dry stone masonry

21B




op to 150

1

S. no. Name of work Item no. No X Sec Length Depth Qty Unit Rate Amount

1 Excavation of earth in hard soil dry or

moist and disposal of excavated material

within initial lead of 50 m and lift 1.5 m,

laying in layers of 15 cm dressing and

compaction etc. complete1.1 In Hard soil 119(b)

1 4.84 18 1 87.08 Cu.m. 85.00 7401.38

2 Stone Pitching 15-23 cm thick including

supply of stones

124

1 1 18 0.2 3.60 Cu.m. 670.00 2412.00

9813.38

Add 3% contingency 294.4

Total 10107.8

Say 10000.0

MODEL ESTIMATE OF NALLAH BUNDING

CROSS-SECTION OF NALLAH BUNDING

Top width =Based on seepage line check

Slope of seepage line 4:1

0.6 Stone Pitching

2 :1

1.5 :1 US

DS 1.5

0.9

2.25 3

0.45 3.6 1.8 0.45

5.85

10.75 m

CS = (Tw+Bw) *Ht

2

CS = 4.8375 Sq.m.

Average Cross section 4.84 Sq.m.

V-Ditches Area = 10 ha.

DCB Fencing


Measure

Production

Measure

Total Cost

V. Ditch 178600 23000 201600.00

Plantation 0 494600 494600.00

Fencing DCB 0 268100 268100.00

Total 178600 785700 964300.00

Say 9.64 Lakh

Silvi Pasture Development

Abstract of Cost

Estimate for V.Ditch in Pasture

Area Length Width Interval No of row Length

Ha mtr mtr mtr mtr

10 1000 100 6 167 16667

Dhaman require on V-ditch =0.002 kg/m 33 Kg

Spacing 5 mtr

Dhaman require between v-ditches =10 kg/ha 100 Kg

0.6

0.3

S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Height Qty Unit Rate Amount

1 Jungal clearance 107 1 500 50 1 25000 Sqm 1.4 35000

2 Excavation in hard soil or earth

mixed with bajri and kankar or

boulder dry or moist & disposal of

excavated material within initial lead

of 30 m and lift of 1.5 m including

dressing etc. complete. 2(B) 0.5 16667 0.60 0.3 1500.00 Cum 92 138000.0

Kg

3 Making of balls of grass

seed(1:1:2:2) 1 grass seed :1 FYM : 2

sand : 2 clay

3/1/9

forest 133 133.00

Per 6 kg

material 17 376.8

4 Sowing of balls of grass seed by

dibbling method at 30 cm spacing

3/2/9

forest 133 133

Per 6 kg

material 109 2416.2

5 Cost of seed CAZARI Jodhpur 133 Kg 150 19950

195743.0


Conservation Measure 178600.0 Total 201615.3

Production Measure 23000.0 Say 201600.0

Plant to pant Spacing 4 m 24 Sqm No of plant 4166.67

Row to row Spacing 6 m Gap filling 20% 833.333

Available Area 10 Ha Total no of Plants 5000

Item no

Year No./Year

1 Digging of pit( kankar boulder soil) 112 ('C) 1 0.45 0.45 0.45 1 No 13.4 13.40 67000

2Cost of Plant As per

forest 1 No. 5 5.00 25000

3 Planting of plant 113(A) 1 No. 3.6 3.60 18000

4 Making thavla 117(A) 2 1 1 No. 2.4 4.80 24000

5 Weeding & Hoeing 116 3 1 3 No. 1.2 3.60 18000

6Insecticide treatment Market

rate3

0.03 ml 0.009 Ltr 305 2.75 13725

7 Watering of plants 115 3 5 15 no 1.8 27.00 135000

8 Transportation of water 5 Km 108 3 5 225 /1000Ltr 37.4 8.42 42075

9 Watch & ward Minimum

wages3

12 34 Month 3240 22 110160

10

Transportation of plants from

nursery to planting site

LS

1

1 1 1 1.00 5000

11 Pruning of plants forest bsr 1 1 1.00 / plants 0.89 0.89 4450

12

Protection of plants from frost / loo

using grass or other locally available

material by making jhonpa of 0.6 m

dia. Of plant height and covering the

1 1

1.00 / plants 3.56 3.56 17800

TOTAL 480210Contingency 3% 14406

Grand total 494616

Say 494600.0

(Amount for

10 ha.)

Rate AmountUnit

Model estimate of Plantation Work in Pasture land

QtyDescription

Total

S.No Length Width Height

0.9 m

Area 10 Ha

Length 1580 mtr

1.2 m

1.5 m 0.3

1.5 m

1.2 m

0.9 m

S. no. Name of work Item no. No Length Width Hight Qty Unit Rate Amount

1 Layout for DCB 2 1580 1 1 3160.00 Cu.m. 0.70 2212.00

2 Excavation of earth in dry or moist

and disposal of excavated material

within initial lead of 50 m and lift

1.5 m

2.1 In hard soil 50% 2(2) 1 790 1.2 1.2 1137.60 Cu.m. 92.00 104659.20

2.2 In Disintegrated rock 50% 2(3) 1 790 1.2 1.2 1137.60 Cu.m. 134.00 152438.40

3 Sowing of seed on ridge 114 1 790 1 1 790.00 Rm 0.60 474.00

Cost of seeds LS 5.00 Kg 50.00 250.00

260033.60


Total 268084.6

Say 268100.0

Estimate of Ditch Cum Bund Fencing

Staggered Contour Trenches

DCB Fencing Area = 10 ha.


Measure

Production

Measure

Total Cost

Staggered Contour Trenches 118100 9000 127100.00

Agro Forestry 0 344800 344800.00

Fencing DCB 0 268100 268100.00

Total 118100 621900 740000.00

Say 7.40 Lakh

Page no. 249


Abstract of Cost

Page no. 249

Particulars Value Unit

Length 4 m

Width 0.45 m

Depth 0.45 m

No. of trenches per ha 125 no.

Area = 10.00 ha

S.no Activity Item No Length Width Hight

1 Layout for Trenches 1 5000

2 Earth work Excavation in hard

soil up to 1.5 mt Hight and

deposited excavated meterial

lead op to 50 m 2.1 In hard soil 50% 2(2) 1 2500 0.45 0.45

2.2 In Disintegrated rock 50% 2(3) 1 2500 0.45 0.45

3 Sowing of seeds on the

constructed ridge in two rows

2 5000

4 Supply of Stylo/Dhaman seed

@ 4 gm / m in two lines

2 5000

Conservation Measure

Production Measure

Model Estimate

118100

9000


4m

Qty Unit Rate Amount

5000 meter 0.7 3500

506.25 cum. 92 46575

506.25 cum. 134 67837.5

10000 meter 0.6 6000

20 Kg 150 3000

123412.5

Add 3% contengecy 3702.375

127114.88

Say 127100.0

Model Estimate

0.45m



Available Area = 10 Ha No of plant 2500

No.of Staggered Contour Trenches = 1250 Gap filling 20% 500

Total no of Plants 3000

Item no

Year No./Year

1Digging of pit( kankar

boulder soil)

112 ('C)

1 0.45 0.45 0.45 1 No 13.4 13.40 40200

2Cost of Plant As per

forest 1 No. 5 5.00 15000




6Insecticide treatment Market

rate3

0.03 ml 0.009 Ltr 305 2.75 8235


8Transportation of water

5 Km

1083

5 225 /1000Ltr 37.4 8.42 25245

9 Watch & ward Minimu

m wages3

12 34 Month 3240 37 110160

10

Transportation of plants

from nursery to planting

site

LS

1

1 1 1.85 1.85 5550

11Pruning of plants forest

bsr1 1

1.00 / plants 0.89 0.89 2670

12Protection of plants

from frost / loo using 1 1

1.00 / plants 3.56 3.56 10680

TOTAL 334740

Contingency 3% 10042

Grand total 344782

Say 344800.0

344800

Description

Total

S.No Length Width Height (Amount for

10 ha.)

Rate AmountUnitQty

0.9 m

Area 10 Ha

Length 1580 mtr

1.2 m

1.5 m 0.3

1.5 m

1.2 m

0.9 m


1 Layout for DCB 2 1580 1 1 3160.00 Cu.m. 0.70 2212.00

2 Excavation of earth in dry or

moist and disposal of

excavated material within initial

lead of 50 m and lift 1.5 m

2.1 In hard soil 50% 2(2) 1 790 1.2 1.2 1137.60 Cu.m. 92.00 104659.20

2.2 In Disintegrated rock 50% 2(3) 1 790 1.2 1.2 1137.60 Cu.m. 134.00 152438.40

3 Sowing of seed on ridge

114 1 790 1 1 790.00 Rm 0.60 474.00

Cost of seeds LS 5.00 Kg 50.00 250.00

260033.60


Total 268084.6

Estimate of Ditch Cum Bund Fencing

Say 268100.0


Stone Wall Fencing Area = 10 ha.


Measure

Production

Measure

Total Cost

Staggered Contour Trenches 117900 9000 126900.00

Plantation 0 344800 344800.00

Stone wall Fencing 0 404600 404600.00

Total 117900 758400 876300.00

Say 8.76 Lakh


Abstract of Cost

Particulars Value Unit

Length 4 m

Width 0.45 m

Depth 0.45 m 4m

No. of trenches per ha 125 no.

Dhaman require between SCT =7 kg/ha 60 Kg

Dhaman require on SCT =0.002 kg/m 10 Kg Area = 10.00 ha

S.no Activity Item No Length Width Hight Qty Unit Rate Amount

1 Layout for Trenches 1 5000 5000 meter 0.7 3500

2 Earth work Excavation in hard soil up to 1.5

mt Hight and deposited excavated meterial

lead op to 50 m

2.1 In hard soil 50% 2(2) 1 2500 0.45 0.45 506.25 cum. 92 46575

2.2 In Disintegrated rock 50% 2(3) 1 2500 0.45 0.45 506.25 cum. 134 67837.5

Kg

3 Making of balls of grass seed(1:1:2:2) 1 grass

seed :1 FYM : 2 sand : 2 clay

3/1/9

forest

70

70

Per 6 kg

material

17 1190

4

Sowing of balls of grass seed by dibbling

method at 30 cm spacing

3/2/9

forest

70

70

Per 6 kg

material

109 7630

123232.5

Add 3% contengecy 3696.975

Conservation Measure 117900 126929

Production Measure 9000 Say 126900


Model Estimate

0.45m

Estimate of Stone Wall Fencing

0.6 m

Area 10 Ha

Length 1580 mtr

1.2 m

0.8 m


1 Stone wall fencing

Random rubble loose

stone fencing

111 1 1580 0.7 1.2 1327.2 Cu.m. 296 392851.2

392851.2


Total 404636.7

Say 404600

352700

Available Area = 10 Ha No of plant 2500

No.of Staggered Contour Trenches = 1250 Gap filling 20% 500

Total no of Plants 3000

Item no

Year No./Year

1 Digging of pit( kankar

boulder soil)

112 ('C)

1 0.45 0.45 0.45 1 No 13.4 13.40 40200

2 Cost of Plant As per

forest 1 No. 5 5.00 15000




6 Insecticide treatment Market

rate3

0.03 ml 0.009 Ltr 305 2.75 8235


8 Transportation of water 5

Km

1083

5 225 /1000Ltr 37.4 8.42 25245


wages3

12 34 Month 3240 37 110160

10 Transportation of plants


site

LS

1

1 1 1.85 1.85 5550

Description

Total

S.No Length Width Height


(Amount for

10 ha.)

Rate AmountUnitQty

11 Pruning of plants forest bsr 1 11.00 / plants 0.89 0.89 2670

12 Protection of plants from

frost / loo using grass or

other locally available

material by making jhonpa

of 0.6 m dia. Of plant

height and covering the

plant.

1 1

1.00 / plants 3.56 3.56 10680

TOTAL 334740

Contingency 3% 10042

Grand total 344782

Say 344800.0

V-Ditches Area = 10 ha.

Stone wall Fencing


Measure

Production

Measure

Total Cost

V. Ditch 178600 23000 201600.00

Agro Forestry 0 494600 494600.00

Fencing of Stone wall 0 404600 404600.00

Total 178600 922200 1100800.00

Say 11.01 Lakh

Silvi Pasture Development Work

Abstract of Cost

Area Length Width Interval No of row Length

Ha mtr mtr mtr mtr

10 1000 100 6 167 16667

Dhaman require on V-ditch =0.002 kg/m 33 Kg

Spacing 5 mtr

Dhaman require between v-ditches =10 kg/ha 100 Kg

0.6

0.3


1 Jungal clearance 107 1 500 50 1 25000 Sqm 1.4 35000

2 Excavation in hard soil or earth

mixed with bajri and kankar or

boulder dry or moist & disposal of

excavated material within initial lead

of 30 m and lift of 1.5 m including

dressing etc. complete. 2(B) 0.5 16667 0.60 0.3 1500.00 Cum 92 138000.0

Kg

3 Making of balls of grass

seed(1:1:2:2) 1 grass seed :1 FYM

: 2 sand : 2 clay3/1/9

forest 133 133.00

Per 6 kg

material 17 376.8

Estimate of V.Ditch in Pasture Development

4 Sowing of balls of grass seed by

dibbling method at 30 cm spacing 3/2/9

forest 133 133

Per 6 kg

material 109 2416.2

5 Cost of seed CAZARI Jodhpur 133 Kg 150 19950

195743.0


Total 201615.3

Say 201600.0

Conservation Measure 178600

Production Measure 23000

Plant to pant Spacing 4 m 24 Sqm No of plant 4166.67

Row to row Spacing 6 m Gap filling 20% 833.33

Available Area 10 Ha Total no of Plants 5000

Item no

Year No./Year

1 Digging of pit( kankar

boulder soil)

112 ('C)

1 0.45 0.45 0.45 1 No 13.4 13.40 67000.00

2 Cost of Plant As per

forest 1 No. 5 5.00 25000.00

3 Planting of plant 113(A) 1 No. 2.7 2.70 13500.00

4 Making thavla 117(A) 2 1 1 No. 2.4 4.80 24000.00

5 Weeding & Hoeing 1163 1 3 No. 1.2 3.60 18000.00

6 Insecticide treatment Market

rate3 0.03 ml 0 Ltr 300 2.70 13500.00

7 Watering of plants 115 3 5 15 no 1.8 27.00 135000.00

8 Transportation of water

5 Km

1083

5 225 /1000Ltr 35.8 8.06 40275.00


wages 312 36 Month 3240 23 116640.00


QtyDescription

Total

S.No Length Width Height (Amount for 10

ha.)

Rate AmountUnit

10 Transportation of plants


site

LS

1 1 1 1 1.00 5000.00

11 Pruning of plants forest bsr

1 1 1.00 / plants 0.89 0.89 4450.00

12 Protection of plants from

frost / loo using grass or

other locally available

material by making

jhonpa of 0.6 m dia. Of

plant height and

covering the plant.1 1 1.00 / plants 3.56 3.56 17800.00

TOTAL 480165.00

Contingency 3% 14404.95

Grand total 494569.95

Say 494600

Estimate of Stone Wall Fencing

0.6 m

Area 10 Ha

Length 1580 mtr

1.2 m

0.8 m


1 Stone wall fencing Random

rubble loose stone fencing

111 1 1580 0.7 1.2 1327.2 Cu.m. 296 392851.2

392851.2


Total 404636.7

Say 404600

S. No. Particulars Quantity Unit Rate (Rs) Amount (Rs)

1 Wooden Ballies (3 m long) 20 No. 70 1400

2 Wooden Ballies (4 m long) 25 No. 80 2000

3 Shade mats for covering the roof 125 Sq. m. 40 5000

4 Binding wire for tying wooden ballies and mats 20 Kg 45 900

5 Labour charges for erection of shades 15 No. 135 2025

6 Shovels, spades, crowbars, iron baskets LS 2000

7 Weighing scale (100 Kg capacity) 1 No. 2500 2500

8 Cow dung 10 Ton 1100 11000

9 Worms @ 3 kg per ton 30 Kg 100 3000

10 Formation of vermi-bed with agro-waste, cow-

dung and worms

20 bed 300 6000

11 Miscellaneous 175

Total Cost 36000

No. of Units 12

Cost for 12 Units 432000

Category No. of Units Contributi

on

Cost from

project

Cost from project

(per unit)

Gen, OBC 8 115200 172800SC ST 4 28800 115200Total 12 144000 288000 24000

MODEL ESTIMATE FOR A VERMI-COMPOST UNIT

Returns from Vermi-compost units

Benefits

1 Sale of vermi-compost 120 Ton 4000 4800002 Sale of worms @ 5 kg per ton 600 Kg 50 30000

Total 510000Net benefit 510000 - 432000 78000

Jodhpur XII

1. Project Outcome :

By the end of the project, in the project area, it is expected that the water level in the tube-wells increases

considerably and sufficient water for man and productivity should be increased after the completion of the project.

Few parameters which are expected to be increased after the completion of completion as the project are as follow :

S. No. Parameters Before Execution of

Project

Expected Increase after the

Completion of the Project

1 Availability of water

a. Average Water Table in the

Wells

650 ft 300-350 ft.

b. Available Water in the Wells/Tube Wells Wells/Tube Wells/Ponds

2. Agriculture/ Horticulture

a. Total Sowing Area

b. (Net) Sown Area (ha)

c. Production of Major Crops:

Wheat

Bajara

Moong

26-29 quintal/ ha.

15-18 quintal/ ha.

3.5-4 quintal/ ha.

35-40 quintal/ ha.

20-25 quintal/ ha.

5-6 quintal/ ha.

d. Production of Rajka 600-700 quintal 800-1000 quintal

e. Average Production of

Horticulture Plants

50-100 quintal

350-500 quintal

(Different types of fruits plants

Mango, Guava, Ber, Papaya, etc)

Jodhpur XII

3. Live Stock

a. Milk Production 3-7 kg/ animal 7-12 kg/ animal

b. Animal Diseases By regular camps, the various diseases will be reduced

4. Livelihood

a. Average income of family by

introduction of other micro

enterprises

Rs.2500-9900

per month

Rs.4000-5000

per month

b. SHG Groups 10 60 The various homogenous groups

will be constituted and the training of

different activities will be given,

especially for land less families.

During the project period (5-7 years), the various activities will be done. The natural resource management

activities will be done in between the project phase. The proposed NRM works in arable, non arable land and

drainage line treatment will increase the water table, production of agriculture/horticulture crops. Similarly the

livestock will increase the milk production. the year wise various outcomes of the project are as follows :

Jodhpur XII

S.

No.

Activity Unit Before

Project

During the Project Period

I Yr II Yr III Yr IV Yr V Yr VI Yr VII Yr

1. Engineering Structure

a.

Contour Bund, CVH,

Restoration of Old

structures, Gully

Control Structure

Hect. Nil 1000 2000 700

b. Earth Bunds, WHS,

Anicut

No. Nil

2. Increase of Agriculture Production due to construction of above Engineering Structure

a. Rabi Season (Main

Crops)

Wheat

Mustard

Qtl/ ha 29

12

29

12

29

12

35

14

37

15

39

16

40

18

40-50

18-20

b. Kharif Season (Main

Crops)

Bajra

Guar

Qtl/ ha 12.5

5.50

12.5

5.5

12.5

5.5

14

6.0

15

8

18

9

20

10

20-25

10-12

3. Increase of Area of Agriculture Production of Engineering Structure

Jodhpur XII

a. Rain fed Area Ha. 1350 3% 5% 7% 8% 10%

b. Irrigated Area Ha. 385 3% 5% 7% 8% 10%

c. Vegetable Area Ha. 20 3% 5% 7% 8% 10%

d. Pasture Development Ha. Nil 10 20

4. Water Table Depth

May m. 190 160 150 140 130 120

September m. 170 155 145 135 125 115

December m. 180 158 148 138 128 118

5. Availability of

Drinking Water

Dec. Dec. Dec. Dec. Jan. Jan. March May

6. Survival of Plants

Horticulture Plants Nos. 20 30 500 2500 5000 8000 10000 10000

Forestry Plants Nos. 100 50 450 1000 2500 4000 9900 8000

7. Milk Production per animal

Cow Kg. 4.5 4.5 4.5 5.5 5.5 6 7 7

Buffalo Kg. 7.5 7.5 7.5 8 8 8 9 9

Goat Kg. 2.00 2.0 2.0 2.0 2.5 3 3 3

8. Control on Migration No. Nil 10% 30% 40% 70% 80%

Jodhpur XII

Critical Assumption

No severe droughts/ unexpected floods/ natural disasters

Adequate funds are allocated for the same and released on time.

There is no significant pest/ disease attack, and if so, then it will have been contained before irreversible damage is done.

Adverse market conditions do not persist long.

Sound macro-economic and growth conditions continue and the benefits are widely distributed particularly in the rural areas.

Facilitating agencies and resource providers have the required competent staff so that timely and appropriate technical advice

and services are provided to farmers whenever required.

The Capacity Building Plan is implemented, monitored and modified to address evolving needs and feedback from participants.

The execution of the Women’s Empowerment Pedagogy is regularly monitored by the District and State level Implementing

Agencies

Means of Verification of indicators

Baseline surveys like household income ,expenditure, health and nutrition etc at the beginning, mid-term and end of the project

period

Annual participatory assessment by communities during project period.

Regular project monitoring reports prepared by project monitoring teams/ agencies.

Membership and other Records, Minutes of Meetings maintained by the SHGs, WCs/ Individual beneficiaries/project-related

village and local bodies/PRIs.

External review missions

Data maintained by Government department (Revenue, Agriculture, Groundwater, Irrigation, Animal Husbandry

Jodhpur XII

EXPECTED OUT COMES

1 2 3 4 5 6

S. No. Item Unit of

measurement Pre-project

Status Expected Post-project Status

Remarks

1 Status of water table (Depth to Ground water level)

Meters

2 Ground water structures repaired/ rejuvenated

No.

3 Quality of drinking water Description

4 Availability of drinking water Description

5 Change in irrigated Area Ha

6 Change in cropping/ land use pattern Description

7 Area under agricultural crop Ha

I Area under single crop Ha

Ii Area under double crop Ha

Iii Area under multiple crop Ha

8 Change in cultivated Area Ha

9 yield of major crops of area

Yield of Bajra q/ha

Yield of Wheat q/ha

Yield of Gram q/ha

Yield of Mustard q/ha

10 production of major crops of area

Production of Bajra ton

Production of Wheat ton

Production of Gram ton

Production of Mustard ton

11 Area under vegetation Ha

12 Area under horticulture Ha

13 Area under fuel Ha

14 Area under Fodder Ha

15 Fodder production Q

Jodhpur XII

16 Milk production Litres/day

17 SHGs Active No.

18 No. of livelihoods No.

19 Income Rs.in la

20 Migration No.

21 SHG Federations formed No.

Jodhpur XII

CHAPTER - VIII Enclosures -

a. Location –District, block, village, Watershed location map

b. Map of ____________ IWMP Project (Watershed Boundary demarcation in cadastral & Topo Sheet)

c. PRA Map (along with photos & paper drawing)

d. Treatment map (Indicate proposed works)

e. Cadastral Map on Watershed boundary

f. Information on Soils, Soil fertility, Land capability, Soil chemical problems like salinity, alkalinity

g. Land Use Land Cover map

h. Information on existing water harvesting structures & well inventory along with GPS co-ordinates.

i. High resolution, latest Remote Sensing Satellite data

Documents of Agreements: Proceedings of gram sabha for EPA approval

Proceedings of gram sabha Resolution for committee constitution

Proceedings of gram sabha for DPR approval

DPR approval by district

Watershed Committee Registration certificate

MoU – PIA – DWMA, PIA – WC (in case of NGO as PIA)