macro implications of micro-participation: participatory management of electricity distribution in...
TRANSCRIPT
Macro Implications of Micro-Participation:Participatory Management of Electricity Distribution in Eastern India
Ashwini K [email protected]
IPPG PhD Workshop3 March 2009
Research Context
The Problem: After six decades of public electrification, half of the population in India lives in
dark. The problem is growing worse as current rate of electrification has failed to
keep pace with population growth. Non-uniform and inefficient service deliverySource: Centralised planning, resource allocation and implementation Long route of accountabilityProposed Solution:
by putting poor people at the centre of service provision: by enabling them to monitor and discipline service providers, by amplifying their voice in policy making, and by strengthening the incentives for providers to serve the poor. (World Bank 2003: 1)
decentralisation and users’ participation through building micro-institutions
Research Questions
Can decentralisation and users’ participation ensure efficient and effective electricity service delivery in rural India?
Does participation in the micro-institutions has any democratic outcome?
Does the context, under which participation takes place, affect the outcomes?
Hypotheses
Decentralisation and users’ participation in electricity delivery will contribute to improvement in efficiency and effectiveness of the service delivery.
Participation in the micro-institutions will enhance political efficacy of the participants and foster the civic values they hold.
The process of users’ participation and its outcomes will be affected by the context under which participation takes place.
Methodology:
Case study approach
Methods of data collection
Semi-structured interviews
Observations
Analysis of documents
Interpretative and qualitative analysis
Case Studies
Micro-Privatisation of Electricity Distribution in Orissa:
First step, Village Electricity Committees were established to ensure participation of users
Second step, putting a micro-entrepreneur (franchisee) between the users’ committees and the service provider
Two patterns found: one, users’ committee and franchisee established (micro-privatisation); second, users’ committee established, but served by the utility (users’ participation)
Electricity Cooperative in Sundarbans, West Bengal:
Each plant has a Beneficiary Committee including all the users served by the plant
Beneficiary committees and the local government (Panchayat Samiti) constitute the cooperative
WBREDA remains the guiding body
Inefficiencies in Electricity Delivery
1. Rampant Electricity Theft
(Hooking, Meter tampering, Billing irregularities)
2. Lack of End-Use Efficiency
(No use of energy efficient products, Lack of load management)
3. Low Revenue Realisation
(Lack of willingness to pay, Irregular collection, Low collection efficiency)
4. High Technical Loss
(Poor maintenance, Lack of manpower, Lack of funds)
5. Poor Quality of Supply
(Load shedding, Breakdown, Low Voltage)
Sources Orissa (Micro-Privatisation)Franchisee & Users’ Committee
Orissa (Users’ Participation)Users’ Committee
Sundarbans (Cooperative)Cooperative & Beneficiary Committee
1 Hooking Meter tampering Billing irregularities
Completely stopped Few cases Completely checked
Completely stopped Few cases Completely checked
Did not exist Not Applicable Did not exist
2 No use of energy efficient products
No load management
Use of CFL in around 50% households
Yes, during evening
Use of CFL in around 50% households
Yes, during evening
Use of CFL (80%) and other energy efficient products
Not applicable
3 Lack of willingness to pay
Irregular collection Low collection
efficiency
Increased willingness
Monthly collection 95 % collection
efficiency
Increased willingness
Bi-monthly collectio 88% collection
efficiency
The problem did not exist
Monthly collection 98% collection
efficiency
4 Lack of proper maintenance
Lack of manpower
Lack of funds for maintenance
Regular maintenance
Private electricians hired
Users partly fund maintenance
Occasional maintenance
Private electricians hired
Users partly fund maintenance
Regular maintenance Does not exist
Does not exist
5 Load shedding Breakdowns Low voltage
No load shedding Ten cases/month Does not exist
No load shedding 25 cases/month Does not exist
Not applicable Not applicable Did not exist
Ineffectiveness in Electricity Delivery
1. Poor Quality of Service:
Less access to service provider
High level of corruption
Low responsiveness of service provider
2. Low Access:
High initial cost
High cost of service (monthly bill)
Cumbersome procedure of application for connection
Sources Orissa (Micro-Privatisation)Franchisee & Users’ Committee
Orissa (Users’ Participation)Users’ Committee
Sundarbans (Cooperative)Cooperative & Beneficiary Committee
1 Low access to provider
High corruption
Low responsiveness of provider
Franchisee is more accessible
Corruption has reduced
Franchisee is responsive
Utility remains less accessible
Corruption has reduced
Utility remains less responsive
Cooperative is more accessible
No corruption
Cooperative is responsive
2 High initial cost High cost of service
Cumbersome procedure of application
Low rate of household electrification (44%)
Reduced initial cost Reduction in monthly
bills Less paper work with
recommendation from the committee
71% household electrified
Reduced initial cost Reduction in monthly
bills Less paper work with
recommendation from the committee
63% household electrified
Low initial cost Users decide the
bill Not Applicable
20% households electrified through cooperative
Conclusion and Suggestions
Putting poor people at the centre of service delivery can work
It will work best when both the users and the provider are given equal status
It requires:
Formal legal status for the micro-institutions
Sharing of power and authority
Funding for their operation
Information sharing
Building a network of the micro-institutions
Special schemes with government subvention
Government funding for maintenance (till the utilities become financially viable)
Thank You