machine learning based qoe testing in mobile networks · 2019. 11. 4. · 9 nov. 2019 ml-based qoe...

13
ITU Workshop on Machine Learning for 5G Berlin, Germany, 5 November, 2019 Arnd Sibila Technology Marketing Manager Rohde & Schwarz Mobile Network Testing MACHINE LEARNING BASED QOE TESTING IN MOBILE NETWORKS

Upload: others

Post on 16-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: MACHINE LEARNING BASED QOE TESTING IN MOBILE NETWORKS · 2019. 11. 4. · 9 Nov. 2019 ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile Networks 1. Drill-down: poor performing CSS area and a guilty

ITU Workshop on Machine Learning for 5G

Berlin, Germany, 5 November, 2019

Arnd Sibila – Technology Marketing Manager

Rohde & Schwarz Mobile Network Testing

MACHINE LEARNING BASED QOE TESTING IN MOBILE NETWORKS

Page 2: MACHINE LEARNING BASED QOE TESTING IN MOBILE NETWORKS · 2019. 11. 4. · 9 Nov. 2019 ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile Networks 1. Drill-down: poor performing CSS area and a guilty

Rohde & Schwarz

CONTENTS

ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile Networks2

ı Drivers for AI/ML in Mobile Network Testing

ı AI/ML applied to Mobile Network Testing

ı Case studies

ı Conclusions

Nov. 20192

Page 3: MACHINE LEARNING BASED QOE TESTING IN MOBILE NETWORKS · 2019. 11. 4. · 9 Nov. 2019 ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile Networks 1. Drill-down: poor performing CSS area and a guilty

Rohde & Schwarz

CONTEXT AND DRIVERS FOR AI/ML IN MOBILE NETWORK TESTING

Extract more information

out of the collected data

Challenges …in result

MNO

Efficiency

► Cost pressure

► Loss of Expertise

► Legacy, labor-intensive way to exploit data

► Increased network complexity− 5G NR brings new use cases and flexibility

− More critical performance and availability

requirementsGuidance,

automation

ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile NetworksNov. 20193

Page 4: MACHINE LEARNING BASED QOE TESTING IN MOBILE NETWORKS · 2019. 11. 4. · 9 Nov. 2019 ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile Networks 1. Drill-down: poor performing CSS area and a guilty

Rohde & Schwarz

MACHINE LEARNING ON MNT

Nov. 2019 ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile Networks4

Test

Test

Test

Test

Results

Training

Process

Training

SetMachine

Learning

Model

… ……

Test

ML

Model

Test

Data

Sample Score

Artificial Intelligence

Machine Learning

Deep Learning

Training

Inference

Types of machine learning:

► Supervised Learning

► Unsupervised Learning / Self-supervised Learning

► Semi-supervised Learning

► Reinforcement Learning

► Active Learning

Page 5: MACHINE LEARNING BASED QOE TESTING IN MOBILE NETWORKS · 2019. 11. 4. · 9 Nov. 2019 ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile Networks 1. Drill-down: poor performing CSS area and a guilty

Rohde & Schwarz

USE CASES FOR MNT

► Binary Test Scoring

Nov. 2019 ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile Networks5

► Time-based Anomaly Detection

Page 6: MACHINE LEARNING BASED QOE TESTING IN MOBILE NETWORKS · 2019. 11. 4. · 9 Nov. 2019 ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile Networks 1. Drill-down: poor performing CSS area and a guilty

► Extract more value out of

each test with binary result

► Patent pending

► Semi-supervised learning

► Applications:

Call Stability Score

Video Stability Score

Call Setup Score

BINARY TEST SCORING

Call Stability Score:

► Call Drop Rate (CDR) is a fundamental KPI to measure network performance.

► Measured from a binary result, the call either drops or not.

► We find levels of CDR of 1% (even less)

► Large number of calls to make the result statistically significant

► Calls may drop at different locations (chance factor)

Page 7: MACHINE LEARNING BASED QOE TESTING IN MOBILE NETWORKS · 2019. 11. 4. · 9 Nov. 2019 ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile Networks 1. Drill-down: poor performing CSS area and a guilty

Rohde & Schwarz

Aggregated call stability scores

Low stability scores markers

CREATING MORE INSIGHTS THROUGH MACHINE LEARNINGVISUALIZATION EXAMPLE

Operator A Operator B

CDR: 0.20%

CSFR: 0.35%

Call Stability Score: 0.71

CDR: 0.25%

CSFR: 0.28%

Call Stability Score: 0.85

Nov. 2019 ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile Networks7

Page 8: MACHINE LEARNING BASED QOE TESTING IN MOBILE NETWORKS · 2019. 11. 4. · 9 Nov. 2019 ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile Networks 1. Drill-down: poor performing CSS area and a guilty

Rohde & Schwarz

1. Drill-down: poor performing CSS area and a guilty session with poor CSS, 0.17

(call was successful)

2. Next step: straightforward session analysis

CALL STABILITY SCORE – PROACTIVE IDENTIFICATION OF RISKY AREAS

ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile NetworksNov. 20198

Page 9: MACHINE LEARNING BASED QOE TESTING IN MOBILE NETWORKS · 2019. 11. 4. · 9 Nov. 2019 ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile Networks 1. Drill-down: poor performing CSS area and a guilty

Rohde & Schwarz

CALL STABILITY SCORE – PROACTIVE IDENTIFICATION OF RISKY AREAS

► Sudden drop of LTE RSRP

and SINR

► Machine learning model

provides a poor score

► Model learnt that calls with

this behavior often dropped

► Proactive identification of

risky areas

► Obtain more value out of

the collected data

► Expose previously hidden

information

ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile NetworksNov. 20199

1. Drill-down: poor performing CSS area and a guilty session with poor CSS, 0.17

(call was successful)

2. Next step: straightforward session analysis

-75

-105

30

10

Page 10: MACHINE LEARNING BASED QOE TESTING IN MOBILE NETWORKS · 2019. 11. 4. · 9 Nov. 2019 ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile Networks 1. Drill-down: poor performing CSS area and a guilty

► Automate optimization by

focusing on detected

anomalies

► Unsupervised Learning

► Applications:

Call Setup

Capacity Download

Capacity Upload

Video Streaming

TIME-BASED ANOMALIES

Time Error

measured

predicted by ML model Example parameters

Page 11: MACHINE LEARNING BASED QOE TESTING IN MOBILE NETWORKS · 2019. 11. 4. · 9 Nov. 2019 ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile Networks 1. Drill-down: poor performing CSS area and a guilty

Rohde & Schwarz

1. VoLTE call establishment

2. Establishment time is long (~13 sec) whilst having a very good radio environment

ANOMALY DETECTION – GUIDING OPTIMIZATION

ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile NetworksNov. 201911

Very good RSRP + very good SINR + very long CST = Anomaly!

5G: Time-based anomalies important due to many new

parameters and high flexibility of data/configurations

Page 12: MACHINE LEARNING BASED QOE TESTING IN MOBILE NETWORKS · 2019. 11. 4. · 9 Nov. 2019 ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile Networks 1. Drill-down: poor performing CSS area and a guilty

Rohde & Schwarz

CREATING MORE INSIGHTS THROUGH MACHINE LEARNINGSUMMARY OF THE BENEFITS

► Automatic calculation of the call stability score for every call. Every result becomes more meaningful.

We maximize the number of usable/actionable test results by a dramatic factor

► Obtain meaningful results also from places where the “traditional” test result would not indicate any

problem

► Less test data needed save time in data collection

► Proactive identification of risky areas ease network optimization

► Streamline analysis: Guided optimization

► 5G: ML-based models to detect and predict beam-forming related topics would be of high advantage

Extract more value out of the collected data Efficiency

ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile NetworksNov. 201912

Page 13: MACHINE LEARNING BASED QOE TESTING IN MOBILE NETWORKS · 2019. 11. 4. · 9 Nov. 2019 ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile Networks 1. Drill-down: poor performing CSS area and a guilty

Rohde & Schwarz

LEARNINGS AND CONCLUSIONS

Increasing network complexity and cost-pressure

More efficient / less labor-intensive methodology to extract

key metrics

Machine Learning extremely valuable for mobile network

analytics to extract deep insights into network performance

ML-based QoE Testing in Mobile Networks

Call Stability Score and Anomaly Detection: identify risky

areas and trends; guide optimization efforts

Nov. 201913

Outlook: 5G and Industry 4.0 offers many more use cases

(high reliability “data connection stability”, etc.)

https://blog.mobile-network-testing.com

www.rohde-schwarz.com/MNT-5G