mac281 the suits vs the scene
DESCRIPTION
Updated session slides for the MAC281 lecture on music piracyTRANSCRIPT
Early discourse surrounding file-sharing fell into 2 camps: 1. File-sharing threatens the livelihood of artists 2. Fan-friendly celebratory explanations on how to
‘do’ file-sharing
2
Early discourse surrounding file-sharing fell into 2 camps: 1. File-sharing threatens the livelihood of artists 2. Fan-friendly celebratory explanations on how to
‘do’ file-sharing
First point reconfigured as: 1. File-sharing threatens the livelihood of
conglomerates (Rodman & Vanderdonckt, 2006: 245-6)
3
4
5
6
7
8
download music = lost sales revenue a limited economic notion
music is prone to personal, cultural, social & political meaning processes
9
Bagdikian (2004) claims that media monopolies not only know this, they count on it. Fans &‘their’ favourite band/artist/song/etc The value and price of music are 2 different
things 10
11
1. The reasons given by social scientists as to why people file share
2. Explanation how music gets online 3. Common reasons given by pirates as
to why people share files 12
Between 3-10% of artists recoup industry expenses (Leyshon, 2005: 187)
EMI sales down by £50m in 2006 Profit of £110m
Industry is not interested in merely making a profit, but in maximising profits
13
Users seek ‘to redress perceived moral and economic wrongs’ (Rojek, 2005: 362) Rich vs. poor Music industry vs. music fans The suits vs. the scene
14
The industry not only makes money from music, but from the hardware used to pirate it
(Rodman & Vanderdonkct, 2006: 253-4)
Social bandits don’t see themselves as criminals
‘Normalization’ thesis (Parker 1998, 2002)
15
Rojek, 2005: 365
16
‘Owners of Mac computers were presented with a product that extended the performance of their computers. The issue of law-breaking was obscured by Apple-Mac’s tried and tested “Think Different” advertising campaign, which privileged Mac users as distinctive, creative mavericks operating in consumer culture which, by implication, was portrayed as bland and docile’
A collection of secretive Release Groups Kudos for being the 1st with a pre-
release piece of: Software CD/DVD Video games eBooks code
17
18
19
20
21
22
Exclusive invite-only private torrent community
Specialised in high quality sound recordings
Registered in the UK, hosted in the Netherlands & had users from 150+ countries.
23
24
25
26
Air: Pocket Symphony Release date: March 5th 2007 Arcade Fire: Neon Bible Release date: March 5th 2007 LCD Soundsystem: Sound of Silver Release date: March 19th 2007
Kings of Leon: Because of the Times Release Date: April 2nd 2007 Explosions in the Sky: All of a Sudden I Miss Everyone Release date: February 26th 2007
27
28
29
30
UK release date: 21st Feb 2009
31
32
33
34
35
36
The ‘Hydra’?
37
1. File-sharers resent years of overpriced products (expensive CDs & ‘filler’)
2. Pre-release exclusivity 3. Discover new music/ lost classics without financial risk 4. Community spirit (private sites, social networks, blogs) 5. Very easy to do and low risk! 6. Reaction against mainstream mass-produced pap/pop 7. Fan ownership of musical products & free will vs. industry 8. DRM encourages passivity and limits future
development/creativity 9. The sound quality of legitimate digital music is insufficient
for many audiophiles 10. Music consumption has changed
38
Gillespie (2006) identifies users of various technologies have tampered with them to produce innovative and imaginative results (culture of hacking)
Remixing? Mash-ups? Bootlegs? Intellectual property vs. end-users
(see www.eff.org) ‘Fair Use’ law
39
40
CDs: Cactus Data Shield
DVDs: RCE; CSS; Macrovision
HD-DVD/Blu-Ray restrictions Microsoft Vista
41
42
Mackay & Gillespie, 1992: 698-9
‘People are not merely malleable subjects who submit to the dictates of a technology; in their consumption, they are not the passive dupes suggested by crude theorists of ideology, but active, creative and expressive – albeit socially situated – subjects.
43
Mackay & Gillespie, 1992: 698-9
‘People may reject technologies, redefine their functional purpose, customize or even invest idiosyncratic symbolic meanings in them. Indeed they may redefine a technology in a way that defies its original, designed and intended purpose … However, the appropriation of a technology cannot be entirely separated from its design and development: technologies are designed for particular purposes’
44
Filesharing embraced by music fans and (some) artists as a means to transform the relationship between producer and consumer
Pirates don’t see themselves as criminals
Filesharing is hierarchical and social Filesharing is not the end of relationship
between musicians and fans
45
B. Bagdikan, 2004, The New Media Monopoly, Boston: Beacon Press. Tarleton Gillespie, 2006, ‘Designed to “effectively frustrate”: copyright, technology and the agency of
users’ in New Media & Society, Vol. 8, No. 4. Courtney Love, 2000, ‘Courtney Love does the math’ available at
http://dir.salon.com/story/tech/feature/2000/06/14/love/index.html Hugh Mackay & G Gillespie, 1992, ‘Extending the Social Shaping of Technology Approach: Ideology
and Appropriation’ in Social Studies of Science, Vol. 22, No. 4. H. Parker, J. Aldridge & F. Measham, 1998, Illegal Leisure: the Normalization of Adolescent
Recreation Drug Use, London: Routledge. H. Parker, L. Williams & J. Aldridge, 2002, ‘The normalisation of “sensible” recreational drug use:
further evidence from the North-West England Longitudinal Study’ in Sociology, Vol. 36, No. 4. Gilbert B. Rodman & Cheyanne Vanderdonckt, 2006, ‘Music For Nothing Or, I Want My MP3: The
regulation and recirculation of affect’ in Cultural Studies, Vol. 20, No. 2-3. Chris Rojek, 2005, ‘P2P Leisure exchange - net banditry and the policing of intellectual property’ in
Leisure Studies, Vol. 24, No. 4 Robbie Williams, 2003, ‘Music piracy “great”, says Robbie’ available at
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/music/2673983.stm http://www.eff.org/
46
47
S1, ToobyDoo, 2008, “Piracy”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/toobydoo/2476286356/
S8-10, Liako, 2009, “Piracy: it’s a crime”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/liako/3558668316/
S12, Dr Stephen Dann, 2006, “piracyisacrime 29—09-2005 9-51-37 PM”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/stephendann/80725933/
S13-15, c3o, 2006, “Anti piracy ads”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/c3o/244072083/
S16, 40, Selma90, 2009, “Apple”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/selma90/3675162262/
S41, Jamougha, 2009, “DVD Magic”, P47, Selma90, 2009, “Apple” http://www.flickr.com/photos/selma90/3675162262/
S43-44, scribbletaylor, 2009, “20th April: Technology and gadgets”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/64958688@N00/3463716076/
S48, A. Diez Herrero, 2007, “creative commons -Franz Patzig-”, http://www.flickr.com/photos/21572939@N03/2090542246/
48