m3 - 1 april 2014 - minutes (2) - alpine shire council · ms heather green – director ... m3 –...
TRANSCRIPT
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1353
The Ordinary Meeting of the Alpine Shire Council was be held in the Council Chamber,
Churchill Avenue, Bright on 1 April 2014 and commenced at 7.00 pm.
PRESENT
COUNCILLORS
Cr Peter Roper – Mayor
Cr Jan Vonarx – Deputy Mayor
Cr Kate Farrell
Cr Daryl Pearce
Cr Ron Janas
OFFICERS
Mr Dave Barry – Chief Executive Officer
Ms Heather Green – Director Sustainable Development
Mr Trevor Britten – Director Corporate and Community
Mr Ian Ellett – Director Infrastructure Service
Ms Lisa Hood – Executive Assistant to Chief Executive Officer
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1354
AGENDA
1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF TRADITIONAL CUSTODIANS, RECOGNITION OF ALL
PEOPLE AND OPENING PRAYER ....................................................................... 1356
2 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES .......................................................................... 1356
2.1 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING – M2 ................................................................. 1356
3 APOLOGIES ...................................................................................................... 1356
4 OBITUARIES / CONGRATULATIONS ................................................................... 1356
5 DECLARATIONS BY COUNCILLORS OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST ......................... 1356
6 QUESTION TIME ............................................................................................... 1356
7 PRESENTATION OF REPORTS BY OFFICERS ....................................................... 1358
7.1 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER – DAVE BARRY ......................................................... 1358
7.1.1 Contracts approved by the CEO .............................................................. 1358
7.2 DIRECTOR CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES – TREVOR BRITTEN .......... 1359
7.2.1 Audit Committee Minutes – 18 March 2014 ............................................. 1359
7.2.2 Lease Agreement - Mount Beauty and District Men's Shed ....................... 1361
7.3 DIRECTOR INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES – IAN ELLETT ........................................ 1367
7.3.1 Memorandum of Understanding between Alpine Shire Council and North East
Catchment Management Authority .......................................................... 1367
7.4 DIRECTOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT – HEATHER GREEN ............................. 1369
7.4.1 Alpine Planning Scheme - Amendment C34: Request for Rezoning, Great
Alpine Road, Bright ................................................................................. 1369
7.4.2 Application for a Planning Permit 5.2013.46.1 for the Two Lot Subdivision of
Land and Creation of Easements ............................................................. 1374
8 ASSEMBLY OF COUNCILLORS ........................................................................... 1383
9 PRESENTATION OF REPORTS BY DELEGATES .................................................... 1384
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1355
10 GENERAL BUSINESS .......................................................................................... 1385
11 MOTIONS FOR WHICH NOTICE HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN GIVEN ......................... 1385
12 RECEPTION AND READING OF PETITIONS ......................................................... 1385
13 DOCUMENTS FOR SEALING .............................................................................. 1386
14 CONFIDENTIAL REPORT ................................................................................... 1387
14.1.1 Dinner Plain Montane Swamp Offset Management Agreement ................. 1387
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1356
1 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF TRADITIONAL CUSTODIANS, RECOGNITION OF ALL
PEOPLE AND OPENING PRAYER
The CEO read the opening prayer and acknowledgement of the traditional custodians and
recognition of all people.
2 CONFIRMATION OF MINUTES
2.1 ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING – M2
Cr Jan Vonarx Cr Ron Janas
That the minutes of Ordinary Council Meeting No 2 held on 4 March 2014 as circulated be confirmed. Carried
3 APOLOGIES
Cr Tony Keeble
4 OBITUARIES / CONGRATULATIONS
Cr Jan Vonarx extended congratulations to the Myrtleford Festival Committee on its
organisation of another successful event.
Cr Peter Roper extended congratulations to the organisers, participants and
residents and visitors and Council Officers in its involvement in the recent bicycle
events held across the Shire. The National Mountain Bike Championships event
generated great coverage on SBS and showcased the Shire.
5 DECLARATIONS BY COUNCILLORS OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Nil
6 QUESTION TIME
1. Mr Ray Dyer
Queried the accuracy of the minutes of the March Council Meeting as the start time
was incorrect.
Cr Peter Roper responded.
2. Mr Lory Toriero
Questioned why the Council Website had been altered.
Mr Dave Barry – CEO advised that the old website was out-dated. The new website
had a refreshed look, was easier to navigate and provided more up to date
information and was easier to read.
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1357
3. Mr Stuart Hargraves
Questioned Bennett’s Trail signage and the lack of general signage to navigate
people in the right direction.
Mr Ian Ellett – Director Infrastructure Services took the question on notice. In
the interim the matter would be logged as a CRM.
Ms Heather Green – Director Sustainable Development advised that Council was
in the process of working on a Wayfinding Strategy which would better connect
all the tracks and trails. A Bright and Surrounds Walks and Trails Guide had been
developed and Mr Hargreaves was provided with one at the conclusion of the
Council Meeting.
4. Mr Mark Steven
Congratulated Council on the recent publicity with respect to the Mountain Bike
Event.
Mr Steven asked Council what it was doing to reduce Council expenses and what
Councillors were doing to reduce their spending.
Cr Peter Roper responded and advised that a lot of analysis had been
undertaken since Mr Barry had commenced with Council. Cr Roper also advised
that due to new legislation, councillor expenses would be reported in the annual
report for scrutiny by the public.
Mr Dave Barry – CEO outlined the program underway to review services, costs
and human resources.
Mr Barry advised that every element of the organisation was being looked at to
maximise on the dollar spend for the community.
5. Mr Ray Dyer
Questioned why no response had been provided to a letter given to Cr Peter
Roper regarding Mount Buffalo Chalet.
Cr Peter Roper responded and advised that the letter in question was placed in
the Bright Visitor Information Centre as requested and removed by a person
unknown.
Mr Dave Barry – CEO advised that he had recently met with Mr Dyer to go
through a range of outstanding matters and that this had not been raised at the
time as being outstanding.
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1358
7 PRESENTATION OF REPORTS BY OFFICERS
7.1 CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER – DAVE BARRY
7.1.1 Contracts approved by the CEO
Cr John Forsyth Cr Daryl Pearce
That the Contracts approved by the CEO be noted.
Contract
No.:
1306001 Process: Invitation to tender
Title: Design and construction of upgrade to Snowy Creek Bridge,
Freeburgh, to 25T capacity
Tenderer Timber Restoration Systems Pty Ltd
$ (excl. GST) $80,465.00
Funding: The budget for this project is $130,000 funded from the Snowy
Creek Bridge Construction budget.
Contract
No.:
1400101 Process: Invitation to tender
Title: Erosion mitigation, McIlroy Rae Road, Gapsted
Tenderer O’Loughlin Excavations Pty Ltd
$ (excl. GST) $124,065.14
Funding: The estimated cost for this project was $125,000. All costs for
this project are reimbursable under Natural Disaster Funding.
Carried
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1359
7.2 DIRECTOR CORPORATE AND COMMUNITY SERVICES – TREVOR BRITTEN
7.2.1 Audit Committee Minutes – 18 March 2014
File Number:
INTRODUCTION
The Audit Committee (the Committee) met on 18 March 2014. Key reports
presented to the Committee included:
• Quarter 2 financial performance against budget;
• Overview of the new Local Government Reporting Framework;
• Risk Assessment internal audit report, presented by Council’s internal auditors
Crowe Horwath; and
• Progress report – Risk, OHS and WorkCover.
Minutes of the meeting are attached.
Cr John Forsyth Cr Daryl Pearce
That: 1. the minutes of the Audit Committee meeting held on 18 March 2014 be received
and the committee recommendations noted (refer to attachment);
2. a report be provided to the next Audit Committee meeting identifying actions and timeframes to achieve Items 1 to 8 of the Internal Audit report; and
3. Internal Audit Progress Report’ be listed as a standing Audit Committee agenda item until its completion;
4. Employer Performance Rating scores be included in future ‘Risk, OHS and WorkCover’ reports for benchmarking purposes;
5. OHS performance be reported quarterly at Council Briefing Sessions;
6. Conduct of an external OHS audit of all Council worksites against the Act and relevant standards be investigated.
Carried
BACKGROUND
The Audit Committee is charged with overseeing the prudent risk management of
the organisation. A well informed and inquisitive Audit Committee is a fundamental
component of Council’s corporate governance structure.
Matters discussed at the March meeting included:
Finance Report, Quarter 2 Budget Review
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1360
The Finance report was approved at the 4 March 2014 Council meeting. The
Finance Report Quarter 2 was presented to the Audit Committee for information
purposes.
Refer to item 4.1 of the minutes.
Local Government Reporting Framework
Local Government Victoria (LGV) has led the development of the Local Government
Performance Reporting Framework (LGPRF) to ensure that all councils are measuring
and reporting on their performance in a consistent manner.
The LGPRF has now been endorsed in legislation through the Local Government
Amendment (Performance Reporting and Accountability) Act 2014. This Act will
amend the Local Government Act 1989 on 18 April 2014, and introduces new
performance reporting requirements, as well as changes to the presentation of
Council’s Budget and Strategic Resource Plan.
Refer to item 4.2 of the minutes.
Risk Assessment Internal Audit Report
The Audit Committee requested at its October meeting for the Internal Auditors to
undertake a Risk Assessment Review. The purpose of this review was to assist in
determining the high risk areas within Council to assist in prioritising the focus for
internal audits going forward.
Refer to item 4.3 of the minutes.
Progress report - Risk, OHS and Work-Cover
This report presented to the Audit Committee provided an update on OHS and
WorkCover matters and provides an overview of incidents and lost time frequency
rates as requested by the Audit Committee at its October meeting.
Refer to item 4.4 of the minutes.
DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Under Section 80C of the Local Government Act 1989, the following officers declare that they have no interests to disclose in providing this report:
• Director Corporate and Community
• Manager Finance and Business
ATTACHMENT(S)
• 7.2.1 Audit Committee Minutes
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1361
7.2.2 Lease Agreement - Mount Beauty and District Men's Shed
File Number: 00500.13
INTRODUCTION
This report relates to the proposal by the Mount Beauty and District Men’s shed to
develop a parcel of land adjacent to the Mount Beauty Neighbourhood Centre and
more specifically the need to enter into leases with the relevant land and
leaseholders.
Cr Daryl Pearce Cr Ron Janas
That:
1. Council enter into a lease with AGL Hydro for 1150sqm of land on Tennis Court Avenue, being part of Lot 22 PS/412324;
2. The Lease Agreement between AGL Hydro and Alpine Shire Council be signed and sealed;
3. Council agree to enter into a lease with the Mount Beauty and District Men’s Shed for a 250sqm piece of Council land being part Lot 2 LP/215137 and 615sqm piece of the AGL leased land being part Lot 22 PS/412324 both on Tennis Court Avenue; and
4. Public notice of Council’s intention to enter into a lease with the Mount Beauty and District Men’s Shed be given under section 190(3)(c) of the Local Government Act 1989 for a minimum period of four weeks and provide for any person to make a submission on the proposed lease under section 223 of the Act.
Carried
BACKGROUND
Council agreed in September 2013 to:
• excise a parcel of land from the lease agreement between Council and the
Mount Beauty Neighbourhood Centre; and
• enter into a new lease with the Mount Beauty and District Men’s shed for the
same parcel of land to enable them to apply for a grant from the Department of
Human Services.
Recently the Mount Beauty and District Men’s Shed were awarded $60,000 for the
purpose of constructing a new facility to operate the men’s shed service. This grant
was obtained through the Department of Human Service’s Strengthening Men’s
Sheds program.
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1362
ISSUES
Land Area
The site of the proposed men’s shed is owned in part by Council and part by AGL
Hydro. The Mount Beauty Neighbourhood Centre has a lease and portable buildings
on part of the land owned by Council, the subject of the Council’s resolution in
September 2013.
At the time it was noted that the land area was not adequate for the size of the
facility to be constructed and Council officers were negotiating with AGL to lease an
adjacent area of land to the north-west of the parcel in question.
Leases
In order for the Mount Beauty Men’s Shed to proceed Council needs to enter into
two new leases:
1. Lease of 1150sqm from AGL; and
2. Lease to Mount Beauty Men’s shed of 250sqm of Council land and the sub-lease
of 615sqm of the AGL land the subject of lease 1.
Lease 1:
This lease involves a 1150sqm parcel of AGL land on Tennis Court Avenue, being
part of Lot 22 PS/412324 bordered by the Mount Beauty Neighbourhood Centre
and Mount Beauty Pondage.
AGL has agreed to the sublease of 615sqm of this land to the Mount Beauty Men’s
Shed project subject to the following conditions:
• Permitted use is for the construction and operation of a Men’s shed multi-
purpose community facility including commercial activity to the extent that is
ancillary to the operation of a Men’s shed.
• 10-year term;
• $1/annum rent.
The balance of this lease includes the existing walking/bike track and will remain
under Council management.
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1363
Figure 1: Area of AGL Land to be leased
Lease 2:
This proposed lease involves a 250sqm piece of Council land being part Lot 2
LP/215137, and 615sqm piece of the AGL leased land being part Lot 22 PS/412324
both on Tennis Court Avenue and both bordered by the Mount Beauty
Neighbourhood Centre and Mount Beauty Pondage. The proposed conditions of
this lease are:
• available for community use;
• managed by a Committee of Management that is representative of the groups
and organisations using the facility;
• 10-year term;
• $1/annum annual rent;
• the Mount Beauty & District Men’s Shed will be responsible for the following
expenses;
• public liability and Building and contents insurances,
• operating and utility expenses, and
• maintenance according to the Alpine Shire Council Building Maintenance Policy.
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1364
Figure 2: Lease with Mount Beauty Men’s Shed including additional council land
The signing of this lease will provide adequate land for the construction of the
Men’s Shed facility and give some separation to the neighbourhood centre.
On signing and sealing of this lease, the existing lease between Council and the
Mount Beauty Men’s Shed (signed in September 2013) will be terminated.
Legislative Requirements
As Council is proposing to enter into a lease(s) with Mount Beauty Men’s Shed for
the purpose of constructing a building, it must, under section 190(3)(c) of the Local Government Act 1989, at least 4 weeks before the lease is made publish a public notice of the proposed lease and provide for any person to make a submission on
the proposed lease under section 223 of the Act.
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1365
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
2013-2017 Council Plan
Key Direction 5; Services and
facilities
Health, community education and recreation services
cater for an active population of all ages, and offer a
wide variety of choices,
Well planned and serviced infrastructure ensures ease
of access and connection between people, and
Recreation services and facilities encourage the active
participation of all ages groups in the community,
2013-2017 Council Plan
Strategic Objective 3.1 To support the health and wellbeing of communities
Alpine Liveability Plan
Outcome: Connectivity
Priority: Social Connectedness
Strategic Objectives: To
facilitate opportunities for
residents and visitors to
participate in activities that
promote social connectedness
Key 4 year actions: Secure suitable premises for the Mt
Beauty Men's Shed
FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
The project has a total cost of $80,000 of which $60,000 has been sourced and
secured from the Department of Human Service’s Strengthening Men’s Sheds
program with the community contributing $10,000 cash and $10,000 in-kind.
Council’s contribution to the project is $2,500 towards the land and legal costs
associated with the preparation and execution of the leases.
Approximately 250m2 of Council public park and recreation land in Tennis Court
Avenue, Mount Beauty is identified. The value of the land is estimated at $20,000;
under this proposal, the land would remain on Council’s asset register.
CONSULTATION
There has been extensive consultation with the Mount Beauty and District Men’s
Shed, the Mount Beauty Neighbourhood Centre and AGL Hydro. Public notice under
section 190(3)(c) will provide the final step in the consultation process.
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1366
CONCLUSION
Once operational, the shed will benefit numerous user groups and greatly
contribute to the improved health and wellbeing of men in the Alpine Shire. The
leases should be supported to enable the construction of this facility.
DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Under Section 80C of the Local Government Act 1989, the following officers declare that they have no interests to disclose in providing this report:
• Director Corporate and Community
• Community Officer – Facilities and Engagement
ATTACHMENT(S)
• 7.2.2 Lease Agreement between AGL Hydro and Alpine Shire Council
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1367
7.3 DIRECTOR INFRASTRUCTURE SERVICES – IAN ELLETT
7.3.1 Memorandum of Understanding between Alpine Shire Council and North East
Catchment Management Authority
File Number: 564.02
INTRODUCTION
This report presents a Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) between Alpine Shire
Council and North East Catchment Management Authority for Council’s
endorsement. The MOU has been developed to strengthen the partnership and
enhance the working relationship between the two organisations.
Cr Ron Janas Cr Jan Vonarx
That Council endorses the Memorandum of Understanding between Alpine Shire Council and North East Catchment Management Authority (refer to attachment).
Carried
BACKGROUND
A Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) has been developed jointly by officers
from Council and North East Catchment Management Authority (NECMA) to help
ensure that there is a collaborative effort where the objectives of each organisation
overlap.
The key purpose of the MOU is to enhance the working relationship between
Council and NECMA and the respective understanding of each other’s business.
It is expected that the stronger partnership between the two organisations will
deliver the following benefits:
• A shared approach to implementing key initiatives of NECMA’s Regional
Catchment Strategy (May 2013) and Council’s Environment Strategy (October
2013) including possible joint funding applications.
• A streamlined approvals process for works on waterways.
• Improved flood plain management.
• Stronger recognition of the high public use for recreational purposes of key
urban waterway environments such as the river pools.
• A closer and more informed working relationship in emergency management.
• Improved community understanding of the natural resource management roles
of both organisations.
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1368
ISSUES
This report presents a proposed MOU for Council’s consideration.
The synergy of Council’s Environment Strategy with NECMA’s Regional Catchment Strategy and the agreement by each organisation to enter into an MOU provide an ideal opportunity in the coming weeks to jointly launch the Environment Strategy with this agreement to a stronger partnership.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
The Council Plan provides very strong distinct linkages to support this initiative.
The Council’s vision and the some of the key themes, namely Inspired Community Leadership, Enhancing the environment and liveability, and Strengthening the Community all provide clear strategic direction in relation to this MOU.
While some improved and streamlined processes are expected to be achieved
through the MOU, there are no specific policy implications.
FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
There are no direct financial implications as a consequence of entering into this
MOU.
The document provides a shared understanding of a number of specific outcomes
to be pursued but does not commit Council to any specific projects or works.
CONSULTATION
Consultation has occurred between officers of both organisations.
It is understood that the NECMA Board will be considering this MOU at its meeting
on 22 April 2014.
CONCLUSION
The proposed MOU provides a positive opportunity for Council and NECMA to
make a commitment to work collaboratively for the benefit of the community.
DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Under Section 80C of the Local Government Act 1989, the following officers declare that they have no interests to disclose in providing this report:
• Director Infrastructure Services
ATTACHMENT(S)
• 7.3.1 Memorandum of Understanding between North East Catchment
Management Authority and Alpine Shire Council dated March 2014.
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1369
7.4 DIRECTOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT – HEATHER GREEN
7.4.1 Alpine Planning Scheme - Amendment C34: Request for Rezoning, Great
Alpine Road, Bright
File Number: 01468.34
INTRODUCTION
Oxley and Company, on behalf of the land owner Malcolm Milne, has made a
request to Council to amend the Alpine Planning Scheme. The amendment request
is to rezone nine parcels of land being, Lots 1 and 2 PS613866 and Lots 1, 2, 4, 5, 7,
8 and 9 TP859376, Great Alpine Road, Bright, from the Farming Zone to the
Residential 1 Zone. Council must consider the request and if it supports the
proposal seek authorisation from the Minister for Planning to prepare the
Amendment.
Cr Ron Janas Cr Kate Farrell
That authorisation be sought from the Minister for Planning, under Section 8A(2)and (3) of the Planning and Environment Act 1987, to prepare amendment C34 to the Alpine Planning Scheme to:
a. rezone Lots 1 and 2 PS613866 and Lots 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 and 9 TP859376, Great Alpine Road, Bright, from the Farming Zone to the Residential 1 Zone; and
b. apply the Development Plan Overlay (Schedule DPO3) to the subject land.
Carried
BACKGROUND
The Land
The subject land is described as:
• comprising 9 separately transferrable parcels identified as Lots 1 and 2
PS613866 (within Certificates of Title Vol.11193 Folios 485 and 486) and Lots 1,
2, 4, 5, 7, 8 and 9 TP859376 (within Certificate of Title Vol.06451 Fol.140);
• located on the south side of the Great Alpine Road approximately 1.7 kilometres
north west of the Bright town centre;
• being situated within the identified Urban Growth Area 1 – Great Alpine Road
and Stackey Gully Road locality;
• irregular in shape and largely oriented in a north south direction;
• approximately 8ha in area; and
• predominantly cleared other than a few relatively young native trees and a small
nut plantation in the north west corner of the site.
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1370
Zoning
Being located on the edge of the Bright Township the subject land is currently
included in the Farming Zone. It is to be noted also that the land to the south across
Stackey Gully Road is zoned Residential (R1Z) while nearby to the south east as well
as to the east across the rail trail land is land situated within the Low Density
Residential Zone.
Figure 1: Locality Plan
Residential Land Review 2005
The Alpine Shire Residential Land Review:
• was adopted in 2005 and amended in 2006;
• assessed the Shire’s population growth, its location, residential development
activity and the availability of lots including land in the Bright locality;
• recommended rezoning a number of parcels of land, including the subject land,
to ensure that an adequate land bank of residential land is maintained to satisfy
future demand; and
• was given effect in the Alpine Planning Scheme by way of Amendment C15
coming into effect on 20 January 2011.
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1371
Amendment Request
The request seeks the following changes to the Alpine Planning Scheme:
• rezone Lots 1 and 2 PS613866 and Lots 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 and 9 TP859376, Great
Alpine Road, Bright, from the Farming Zone to the Residential 1 Zone); and
• apply the Development Plan Overlay (Schedule DPO3) to the subject land.
The draft explanatory report outlining what the amendment is about and the
strategic justification for the amendment is included as attachment 7.4.2 to this
report.
ISSUES
Subdivision
It should be noted that the request before Council is for the rezoning of the land
only and any proposal for subdivision of the land in the future will be subject to the
due process of a planning permit application under the Planning and Environment Act 1987 and the provisions of the Alpine Planning Scheme that apply at that time. Councils support for the rezoning at this stage does not imply support or approval
for the subdivision of the subject land.
The proposal has been referred to VicRoads and CFA who raise no objection to the
Amendment proceeding.
POLICY IMPLICATIONS
Municipal Strategic Statement
Strategy Implementation
Residential Areas
• Utilise existing vacant
residentially zoned land for
short term residential growth.
• Ensure new residential
development respects the
density patterns of existing
residential neighbourhoods.
• Ensure minimum lot sizes for
residential subdivision are
appropriate to the area and
have regard to the existing lot
sizes and density of
development in the
neighbourhood.
Subject to the necessary site investigations
and consultation with relevant authorities,
• potential rezoning of the land to the south
of the Great Alpine Road from Rural to
Residential 1 and Low Density Residential
and applying appropriate development
overlays to ensure: a 50m wide buffer from
the Great Alpine Road; building envelopes
on land included in the Low Density
Residential Zone; and no development
occurs on land with a slope greater than
20%.
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1372
The request to amend the Alpine Planning Scheme to facilitate residential
subdivision of the subject land is consistent with the identified strategies and
implementation measures of Council’s Municipal Strategic Statement.
FINANCIAL AND RESOURCE IMPLICATIONS
The land owner engaged the services of a planning consultant to prepare the
request for amendment. As part of the request, a draft Explanatory Report and draft
DPO schedule have been prepared in support of the amendment and supplied to
Council. Both documents required minor review with the current versions attached
to this report.
Council has also been successful in gaining assistance from DPCD under the Rural
Flying Squad Program to engage EDM Group consultants to prepare necessary
documentation and to assist in the processing of this Amendment.
Both these measures significantly assisted in the reduction of staff resources
required including the initial processing phases such as the subsequent request for
Authorisation being lodged with the Minister for Planning, should Council support
this Amendment proposal.
There will some on-going costs associated with public notification which will be
adequately covered by statutory fees payable by the applicant.
The only unknown at this stage will be costs associated with a potential Panel
Hearing if objections are received to any public exhibition.
CONSULTATION
Sections 17 and 19 of the Planning and Environment Act 1987 outline the required notice and exhibition of an amendment to the planning scheme. Public notification
will be given for a minimum one month period to land owners, relevant Ministers
and authorities and the general public. Consultation is not undertaken until such
time as the Minister for Planning gives authorisation for the amendment.
CONCLUSION
The amendment request before Council is directly in response to strategies
supported with the introduction of Amendment C15 into the Alpine Planning
Scheme. As a consequence it is considered that Council should now seek
authorisation from the Minister for Planning to prepare Amendment C34 to the
Alpine Planning Scheme to:
• rezone Lots 1 and 2 PS613866 and Lots 1, 2, 4, 5, 7, 8 and 9 TP859376, Great
Alpine Road, Bright, from the Farming Zone to the Residential 1 Zone); and
• apply the Development Plan Overlay (Schedule DPO3) to the subject land.
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1373
DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Under Section 80C of the Local Government Act 1989, the following officers declare that they have no interests to disclose in providing this report:
• Director Sustainable Development
• Manager of Development Services and Amenity
ATTACHMENT(S)
• 7.4.1 Amendment C34 Explanatory Report
• 7.4.1 Draft Amendment documentation
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1374
7.4.2 Application for a Planning Permit 5.2013.46.1 for the Two Lot Subdivision of
Land and Creation of Easements
INTRODUCTION
Application Number: 5.2013.46.1
Applicant’s Name: Mr James McCrohan of ESLER & ASSOCIATES
Owner’s Name: Mr Mario Rossaro of 147A KIEWA VALLEY HWY, TAWONGA
SOUTH
Address: LOT 1 on TP339084, 147A KIEWA VALLEY HWY, TAWONGA
SOUTH
Land size: 22.15ha
Current use and
development:
The subject site is currently used for agriculture. There are three
large sheds used in association with the agricultural use and
one dwelling.
Proposal: Two – lot subdivision and creation of easements
Why is a permit required? A planning permit is required for:
- Subdivision pursuant to Clause 35.07-3
- Subdivision pursuant to Clause 44.06-2
- Creation of easements pursuant to Clause 52.02
Zoning: Farming Zone (FZ)
Overlays: Part Bushfire Management Overlay (BMO)
Restrictive covenants on
the title?
Nil
Date Received: Original application lodge 9 May 2013, final amended
application lodged 26 November 2013.
Statutory Days: 126
Planner: Sam Porter
Cr Jan Vonarx Cr Daryl Pearce
That consideration of this application be deferred until at the request of the applicant.
Carried
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1375
REASONS FOR THE RECOMMENDATION
The land is strategically important for the residential growth of Tawonga South and
has been identified in the Residential land Review (Alpine Shire Council 2005) as an
Urban Growth Area. Fragmentation of the land by way of the proposed two lot
subdivision and easement creation has the potential to undermine the future
development of the land for residential purposes.
PROPOSAL
A planning application has been made for a two lot subdivision and creation of
easements at 147A Kiewa Valley Hwy, Tawonga South. The subject land is legally
known as Lot 1 on TP339084 and is located on the western, uphill side, of the Kiewa
Valley Hwy between Feathertop Street and Young and Damms Court (or between
the 1st and 2nd Estates). The subject land is 22.15 hectares in area.
Proposed Lot 1 will contain the existing dwelling and comprises of 4196m2. The
balance lot will comprise of 21.74 hectares and will contain the three large sheds
and the surrounding grazing pastures.
The Proposed Plan of Subdivision is shown below in Figure 1. The proposed Lot 1
is triangular in shape and will contain no frontage to the Kiewa Valley Hwy road
reserve. In order for Lot 1 to obtain legal access a carriage way easement (E-2) is
proposed over the existing driveway to be located on Lot 2. To formalise the
existing town reticulated water supply a second easement (E-1) is proposed across
Lot 2 benefiting Lot 1. A third easement (E-3) is proposed to legalise an historic and
accidental encroachment of development from an adjoining Residential 1 Zoned
(R1Z) piece of land known as 145-147 Kiewa Valley Hwy.
The applicant has advised that he can no longer manage the farm and wishes to
remain in his dwelling in his retirement.
Figure 1 - Subject land and proposed subdivision
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1376
SUBJECT LAND AND SURROUNDS
Subject Site
The subject site is located at 147A Kiewa Valley Hwy, Tawonga South, see Figure 2
below. The dwelling and three large sheds are located in the lower easterly corner,
whilst the remainder of the site is cleared pasture with little exotic or native
vegetation. The land has an easterly aspect and rises approximately 60m in altitude
from east to west. The subject land is part of a larger property owned and operated
by the applicant – an additional 51.1ha. The land has frontage to both the Kiewa
Valley Hwy at two points and one to Feathertop Street. These frontages are critical
to the future residential street layout of the land.
The land is zoned farming and is located amongst the dispersed residentially zoned
township of Tawonga South. The following describes the surrounding area:
North
• Feathertop Street contains a number of residential allotments (R1Z) mostly
containing single dwellings that each has a rear common boundary to the
subject land.
• Buckland Street is zone Low Density Residential (LDRZ) and each property
contains a single dwelling that back onto the subject land.
East
• Is a consistent ribbon of residential housing, zoned R1Z. All lots front the Kiewa
Valley Hwy.
• Further east on the Kiewa River side of the Kiewa Valley Hwy the land is zoned
farming and is predominately grazed.
South
• Directly abutting the subject land is reserve owned by Council zoned Public Park
and Recreation Zone (PPRZ). It contains a watercourse that travels eastwards
towards the Kiewa River.
• Directly further south of this reserve is residential land. This area is the main
residential part of Tawonga South.
West
• The owner of the subject land holds two further rural parcels of land to the west
of the subject land. The smaller of the two parcels contains remnant native
vegetation whilst the second a larger parcel contains cleared grazing pastures
with some isolated patches of vegetation.
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1377
Figure 2 – Subject Land and Surrounds
The zoning of the subject and surrounds is shown below in Figure 3.
Figure 3 – Shows the Subject Land and Surrounds Zoning
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1378
PUBLIC NOTIFICATION
The application was advertised via the sending of notices in the mail to the
surrounding potentially affected property owners. No submissions were received as
part of this process.
REFERRALS
Referrals / Notice Advice / Response / Conditions
Section 55 Referrals Goulburn Murray Water: Conditional consent
requiring the dwelling to connect to the reticulated
sewer.
Country Fire Authority: Conditional consent
North East Water: Conditional consent requiring the
dwelling to connect to the reticulated sewer.
SP Aus-Net: Conditional consent
VicRoads: Conditional consent
Internal / external
referrals
Alpine Shire Engineering: Conditional consent
PLANNING ASSESSMENT
There are two issues that require consideration. The main issue is whether the
subdivision is appropriate having regard to the possible future development of the
land. The second and more minor issue is whether the excision is suitable having
regard to the Farming zone and local policy for excision.
Issue 1 - Future development
In considering the future development potential of the subject land the relevant
direction exists in the SPPF, LPPF and Clause 65.02:
SPPF Clause 11.02-1 states the following relevant strategy:
‘Ensure the ongoing provision of land and supporting infrastructure to support
sustainable urban development.’
LPPF Clause 21.03-2-2 Mount Beauty / Tawonga South
Clause 21.03-2-2 contains the key planning strategies and direction for the Mount
Beauty and Tawonga South area. Figure 4 below shows the correlating map that is
included within this clause and assists in understanding the following direction
summary:
• Support medium to long term resident growth in the identified urban growth
areas.
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1379
• Urban Growth Areas 1 and 2 (UGA 1 & 2) must be have been developed prior to
the UGA 3 (subject land) been further considered for residential development.
• Focus new residential development the western side of the Kiewa Valley Hwy
and ensure lot sizes are appropriate to the area and have regard to the
predominate neighbourhood character.
Clause 65.02 ensures the following relevant guideline is considered:
‘The existing use and possible future development of the land and nearby land.’
Issue 2 - Protection of Agricultural Land
The purposes of the Farming Zone and objectives SPPF and LPPF broadly seek to
protect productive farmland for the ongoing use of agriculture.
Furthermore, Clause 22.02-3 Subdivision to Create a Lot for an Existing Dwelling identifies that the practice of creating lots for existing dwellings in rural areas is
inappropriate as it ultimately increases the pressure for more dwellings.
Notably, the subject site is located in the Kiewa Valley, which is categorised by
Clause 21.03-6 Rural Land as forming part of the ‘extensive’ agricultural land category. The ‘extensive’ agricultural land category, which the highest category
within the Shire’s rural land hierarchy, is characterised by dairy farms, cattle grazing
and larger sized farming units exceeding 20ha in area.
In assessing a proposal to subdivide farmland to create a lot for an existing
dwelling, the LPPF and decisions guidelines of Clause 65 present a number of issues
that must be considered.
The LPPF at Clause 22.02 -3 Subdivision to Create a Lot for an Existing Dwelling applies specific objectives and policies relevant to the proposal. Objectives of Clause
22.02-3 include:
“To ensure that the agricultural capability of the land is not threatened or reduced
by inappropriate subdivision or fragmentation of land holdings.
To ensure that dwellings excised will not prejudice rural production activities on the
land or in the general area.
To reinforce the Council strategy of consolidating residential use in the townships.”
Clause 22.02-3 is supported by a number of policies that apply to the subdivision of
rural land to create a lot for an existing dwelling, including; a minimum lot size of 1
ha; location of a lot outside the ‘alternative’ agricultural land category; requirement
for a Section 173 agreement to prevent further subdivision; prior existence of the
dwelling and capability of the lot to contain an appropriate waste water treatment
system.
Clause 65.02 contains the following relevant decision guidelines:
‘The suitability of the land for subdivision.
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1380
The availability of subdivided land in the locality, and the need for the creation of
further lots.’
Issue 1 - Assessment
As shown in Figure 4 the site is identified for potential future urban growth and such
strategic direction must be considered even in its current FZ status. The relevant
State Planning Policy and Clause 65.02 listed above clearly outlines that Council
must ensure that these urban growth areas are not compromised by allowing
inappropriate premature development.
The major concern with this application is that when development is required the
proposed lot layout will both prevent orderly access being obtained to the Kiewa
Valley Hwy and the physical lot area itself will prevent orderly development.
The correct time to consider the future residential layout of this land is when a
formal amendment to the Alpine Planning Scheme is submitted and processed. As
part of that process the necessary further investigation works as listed in Clause
21.03-2-2 for example (but not limited too) geotechnical assessment and bushfire
management objectives would be considered allowing an overall development plan
of the subject land containing road networks and connection points to existing road
networks to be developed.
The applicant has not submitted any supporting documentation with this
application in the form of an overall development plan to assist in the consideration
of this proposal.
The property subject to this application is designated for future residential
development. Any subdivision of the property should not prejudice that planned
intention. This proposal clearly will inhibit the future development of the site. If the
house was located so that a residential lot could be excised and be part of a
planned subdivision then some consideration might be able to be given to the
proposal. It is likely that when this land is subdivided for residential development
the area under easement and the dwelling will most likely be needed for a new road
that will provide access to the balance of the lot.
In addition the creation of a farming lot without a dwelling may lead to a
subsequent dwelling proposal. This will further prejudice the future residential
development of this land; the applicant has mentioned this likelihood in the
application.
Should this property want to continue to function as a farm the proposed
fragmentation of creating a ‘land locked’ parcel has the potential to affect farming
operations. Although the application notes that the proposed subdivision will
excise only land that curtails the existing surrounding fencing for the dwelling it
does not adequately consider the consequence of creating a single rural living lot
within the bounds of an operating farm and future likely issues of land management
and access conflict that could occur with two different owners.
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1381
Based on the two above points future dwelling pressure and its flow on affects
combined with the land fragmentation and ongoing management issues it is clear
that the subdivision is not appropriate and should not be approved.
Issue 2 - Assessment
The relevant State Policy direction of ‘Ensure the ongoing provision of land and supporting infrastructure to support sustainable urban development and general subdivision guideline direction of Clause 65.02 that states consider ‘The existing use
and possible future development of the land and nearby land’ must be considered
by Council. The strategically listed significance (see figure 4) of this site and the
described potential for it to be undermined as a result of this proposal given it’s not
able to be considered as part of an approved overall development plan means its
unable to appropriately address the relevant areas of the Alpine Planning Scheme.
The proposal has been assessed against the relevant State and Local Planning Policy
Frameworks, the provisions of the Farming Zone, the Bushfire Management Overlay,
Particular Provision Clause 52.02 Easement Creation and the decision guidelines of
Clause 65.02.
Figure 4 – shows the Mount Beauty – Tawonga South Structure Plan as contained with Clause 21.03-2-2 of the
Alpine Planning Scheme
SUBJECT
LAND
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1382
CONCLUSION
Having regard to the provisions of the Alpine Planning Scheme, the proposed two
lot subdivision and creation of easements is not supported.
The permit application fails to adequately demonstrate how the proposal is
consistent with the purposes of the Farming Zone or the objectives and strategies of
the State and Local Planning Policy Framework regarding the fragmentation of an
operational farm and the appropriate protection of future residential development
areas. The future development concerns held are not able to be overcome at this
stage given the lack of layout preparation investigations that would need to occur
before any subdivision be proposed and occur.
The application fails to address the future development concerns if the land was to
be split into two lots along with the potentially cumbersome easements that will
prejudice future residential lot and road layout. As stated previously given the
strategic significance of this land the proposed layout the application is considered
premature as it is unable to suitably consider the relevant provision of the Alpine
Planning Scheme.
DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST
Under Section 80C of the Local Government Act 1989, the following officers declare that they have no interests to disclose in providing this report:
• Manager Development Services and Amenity
• Senior Planning Officer
ATTACHMENT(S)
• Nil
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1383
8 ASSEMBLY OF COUNCILLORS
INTRODUCTION
Section 80A of the Local Government Act 1989 requires a written record of Assemblies of Councillors to be reported at an ordinary meeting of the Council and
to be incorporated in the minutes of the Council meeting.
Cr Kate Farrell Cr Jan Vonarx
That the summary of the Assemblies of Councillors for March 2014 be received. Carried
BACKGROUND
The written records of the assemblies held during the previous month are
summarised below. Detailed assembly records can be found in Attachment 8.0 to
this report.
Date Meeting
4 March 2014 Briefing Session
4 March 2014 S223 Public Submissions Hearing – Martley Street Trial
timed closure
4 March 2014 Porepunkah Township Master Plan Community meeting
18 March 2014 Briefing Session
ATTACHMENT(S)
• 8.0 Assemblies of Councillors – March 2014
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1384
9 PRESENTATION OF REPORTS BY DELEGATES
INTRODUCTION
Councillor portfolios include representation on various committees where Council
has an interest. Delegate reports contain information about meetings attended, and
the outcomes from those meetings that affect Council.
Cr Kate Farrell Cr Daryl Pearce That summary of the presentation of reports by delegates for February / March 2014 be received.
Carried
BACKGROUND
The written records of the delegates reports held during the previous month are
summarised below. Detailed delegates reports can be found in Attachment 9.0 to
this report.
Date Meeting Councillor
26 February 2014 Community Resilience Committee Cr Ron Janas
12 March 2014 Youth Council Cr Ron Janas
14 March 2014 Emergency Services Management
MAV
Cr Ron Janas
14 March 2014 Timber Towns Cr Jan Vonarx
14 March 2014 Rural Councils Victoria Cr Jan Vonarx
ATTACHMENT(S)
• 9.0 Presentation of Reports by Delegates – February /March 2014
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1385
10 GENERAL BUSINESS
Cr John Forsyth advised members of the gallery that the lighting in Council
Chambers were to change to LED lighting to reduce costs.
Cr Daryl Pearce requested and update regarding the Bakers Gully Water Storage.
Heather Green – Director Sustainable Development advised that North East Water
were holding further consultation meetings.
Kevin Black in gallery advised that a consultant had been engaged to do a study on
the platypus population and a meeting with the consultant was scheduled for 3
April 2014.
11 MOTIONS FOR WHICH NOTICE HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN GIVEN
Nil
12 RECEPTION AND READING OF PETITIONS
Nil
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1386
13 DOCUMENTS FOR SEALING
Cr John Forsyth Cr Ron Janas That the following documents be signed and sealed –
1. Section 173 Agreement – Selzer Farming Pty Ltd, Lot 3 on Title Plan 334919N,
Volume 8494 Folio 479. Condition 3 of Planning Permit 2013.120 for a two lot re-subdivision (boundary realignment) at 186 Selzers Lane, Ovens.
The Agreement provides for the protection in perpetuity of an area of native vegetation to offset the clearing of native vegetation to the satisfaction of the responsible authority.
2. Contract No. 1304401 – Alpine Shire Council – WFBD Pty Ltd - Redevelopment of the Toddlers’ Pool with a new Water Play Park, Bright.
3. Contract No. 1306301 – Alpine Shire Council – GW & BR Crameri Pty Ltd – Road Works, Buffalo Creek Road Myrtleford.
4. Deed of Variation – Dinner Plain Tennis Court – Alpine Shire Council.
5. Lease Agreement between AGL Hydro and Alpine Shire Council be signed and sealed.
Carried
Ordinary Council Meeting
M3 – 1 April 2014
1387
14 CONFIDENTIAL REPORT
14.1.1 Dinner Plain Montane Swamp Offset Management Agreement
Agenda item 14.1.1 Legal Agreement Matter is designated confidential as it relates
to a matter which Council considers would be prejudice the Council or another
person.
Cr Ron Janas Cr Jan Vonarx
That in accordance with the provisions of section 89(2) of the Local Government Act 1989, the meeting be closed at 7:31pm to members of the public for the consideration of the following confidential item:
14.1.1 Agreement matter: This agenda item is confidential in accordance with the Local Government Act s89(2) as it relates to a matter which Council considers would prejudice the Council or another person.
Carried
Refer to Confidential Report.
Cr Daryl Pearce Cr Ron Janas That the meeting be reopened to the public time being 7:33pm.
Carried
There being no further business the Chairperson declared the meeting closed at:
7:34pm.
Confirmed,
………………………………
Chairperson