m c m a s t e r e m p l o y e e s ’ p e n s io n s c · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø...

40
M M C C M M A A S S T T E E R R E E M M P P L L O O Y Y E E E E S S P P E E N N S S I I O O N N S S U U R R P P L L U U S S C C O O M M M M I I T T T T E E E E

Upload: others

Post on 08-Oct-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

MMCCMMAASSTTEERR EEMMPPLLOOYYEEEESS’’ PPEENNSSIIOONNSSUURRPPLLUUSS CCOOMMMMIITTTTEEEE

Page 2: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

2PAGE - 2 -

CFA

MURATMG

WHO REPRESENTS YOU

YOUR COMMITTEE: MMccMMaasstteerr EEmmppllooyyeeeess’’PPeennssiioonn SSuurrpplluuss CCoommmmiitttteeee

Page 3: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

3PAGE - 3 -

WHO REPRESENTS YOU (CONT.)

LEGAL COUNSEL

ACTUARIAL CONSULTANTS

Page 4: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

4PAGE - 4 -

CHRONOLOGY

Ø AUGUST, 1998 UNIVERSITY ESTABLISHES

JOINT ADMINISTRATION /EMPLOYEE WORKING GROUP

Ø SEPTEMBER, 1999 DRAFT ORIGINAL PROPOSAL

Ø EARLY 2000 NEGOTIATIONS

MCMASTER EMPLOYEES’PENSION SURPLUS COMMITTEE

ESTABLISHED

Ø SEPTEMBER, 2000 REVISED UNIVERSITY PROPOSAL

Page 5: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

5PAGE - 5 -

CURRENT STATUS OF THE PLAN(AT JULY 1, 2000)

ACTUARIAL VALUE OF ASSETS $971,680,000ACTUARIAL VALUE OF PENSIONS (647,406,000)FUNDING EXCESS (SURPLUS) $324,274,000

PROPOSED SURPLUS WITHDRAWAL (150,000,000)ESTIMATED SURPLUS “BUFFER” $174,274,000*

* BEFORE EXPENSES

* THIS AMOUNT MAY CHANGE

Page 6: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

6PAGE - 6 -

TO COMPLETE THE SURPLUS SHARINGAGREEMENT THE UNIVERSITY MUST:

1. OBTAIN CONSENT FROM VIRTUALLY ALL INDIVIDUALS

ENTITLED TO BENEFITS FROM THE PLAN

2. OBTAIN COURT APPROVAL

3. OBTAIN REGULATORY APPROVAL

Page 7: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

7PAGE - 7 -

LEGAL OPINION RE: SURPLUS

Ø WHEN THE PLAN IS ON-GOING, NO ONE ACTUALLY

“OWNS” THE SURPLUS

Ø ONTARIO COURT OF APPEAL (1995): WHILE PLAN IS ON-GOING THE UNIVERSITY HAS THE LEGAL RIGHT TO

UNILATERALLY TAKE CONTRIBUTION HOLIDAYS

Ø COURT DID NOT MAKE A FINDING RE: SURPLUS OWNERSHIP

ON WIND-UP, BUT DID HOLD THAT THE UNIVERSITY CAN

NOT AMEND PLAN TO GIVE ITSELF THE SURPLUS

Page 8: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

8PAGE - 8 -

LEGAL OPINION RE: SURPLUS (CONT.)

Ø LEGAL COUNSEL REVIEWED ALL HISTORICAL PLAN

DOCUMENTATION, AND FUNDING AGREEMENTS

Ø IF THE PLAN WERE WOUND-UP TODAY, LEGAL COUNSEL

BELIEVE THAT ALL SURPLUS MAY BELONG TO MEMBERS AND

FORMER MEMBERS OF THE PLAN

Page 9: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

9PAGE - 9 -

LEGAL OPINION RE: SURPLUS (CONT.)

BUT:ð THE UNIVERSITY HAS NO

LEGAL OBLIGATION TO WIND-UPTHE PLAN OR OTHERWISEDISTRIBUTE SURPLUS AT THISTIME

Ø THE UNIVERSITY CAN CONTINUE TAKING CONTRIBUTION

HOLIDAYS INDEFINITELY

Page 10: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

10PAGE - 10-

THE PROPOSAL

GUIDING PRINCIPLES

1. THE SURPLUS IS SUFFICIENTLY LARGE AND DOES NOT

GREATLY BENEFIT ANYONE AT THIS TIME

2. EQUAL SURPLUS SHARING BETWEEN UNIVERSITY AND

MEMBERS AFTER DEDUCTING EXPENSES AND SURPLUS

“BUFFER”

3. EXISTING ACCRUED PENSION PLAN OBLIGATIONS WILL

NOT BE AFFECTED BY THIS PROPOSAL

4. PROVISION OF LIMITED TAX-SHELTERING OPTIONS,SUBJECT TO REGULATORY APPROVAL

Page 11: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

11PAGE - 11-

THE PROPOSAL(CONTINUED)

WHO IS INCLUDED IN THE ENTITLEMENT GROUP?

ALL PERSONS WHO, BETWEEN JULY 1 AND DECEMBER 31, 2000,WERE:

Ø ACTIVE EMPLOYEE MEMBERS OF THE PLAN

Ø PENSIONERS AND SURVIVING SPOUSAL PENSIONERS

Ø DEFERRED AND TERMINATED VESTED PLAN MEMBERS

Ø BENEFICIARIES AND ESTATES OF PERSONS WHO ARE

ENTITLED TO A BENEFIT FROM THE PLAN

= APPROX. 4400 MEMBERS

Page 12: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

12PAGE - 12-

THE PROPOSAL(CONTINUED)

WHO IS NOT INCLUDED

Ø ANYONE TRANSFERRED OUT OF THE PLAN PRIOR TO JULY 1, 2000WITHOUT HAVING MAINTAINED A BENEFIT IN THE PLAN

Ø ANYONE WHO JOINED THE PLAN ON OR AFTER JANUARY 1, 2001

THE COMMITTEE WILL NOT SUPPORT, AND MAYOPPOSE, THE INCLUSION OF ANY PERSONS WHO ARENOT PROPERLY PART OF THE ENTITLEMENT GROUP

Page 13: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

13PAGE - 13-

THE PROPOSAL(CONTINUED)

SURPLUS ALLOCATION FORMULAØ DISTRIBUTION BASED ON PRO-RATED ACTUARIAL

VALUE OF PENSION, MODIFIED BY MINIMUMS

MINIMUM SURPLUS DISTRIBUTION:Ø ACTIVE AND DEFERRED MEMBERS

$500 + $250/Y.O.S. UP TO $3,000 (10 YEARS)Ø PENSIONERS: $5,000

Page 14: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

14PAGE - 14-

ROLE OF THE COMMITTEE'SACTUARIAL CONSULTANT

Ø ADVICE ON FINANCIAL/ACTUARIAL ASPECTS OF PROPOSAL

Ø REVIEW OF UNIVERSITY ACTUARY'S CALCULATIONS

Ø PARTICIPATION IN REVIEW OF DATA INTEGRITY

Ø PARTICIPATION IN COMMUNICATION OF PROPOSAL

Ø RESPONSE TO MEMBERS' TECHNICAL QUESTIONS

Page 15: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

15PAGE - 15-

THE PROPOSAL(CONTINUED)

INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

Ø CASH PAYMENT

Ø TAXABLE

Ø WITHHOLDING TAX AT SOURCE

Page 16: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

16PAGE - 16-

THE PROPOSAL(CONTINUED)

INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS (CONTINUED)Ø POSSIBLE TAX-SHELTERING OPTIONS

1. ALL PERSONS ENTITLED UNDER AGE 69:

Ø TRANSFER TO RRSP, IF AVAILABLE

CONTRIBUTION ROOM

Page 17: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

17PAGE - 17-

THE PROPOSAL(CONTINUED)

INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS (CONTINUED)Ø POSSIBLE TAX-SHELTERING OPTIONS

2. ACTIVE EMPLOYEE MEMBERS:

Ø BUY-BACK OF INITIAL UNIVERSITYSERVICE IF YOU DID NOT JOIN THE PLAN

WHEN FIRST STARTED EMPLOYMENT WITH

THE UNIVERSITY (BETWEEN 6-18 MONTHS)

Page 18: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

18PAGE - 18-

THE PROPOSAL(CONTINUED)

INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS (CONTINUED)Ø POSSIBLE TAX-SHELTERING OPTIONS

3. PENSIONERS AND DEFERRED MEMBERS

Ø REFUND OF PRE-1991 CONTRIBUTIONS

WITH INTEREST TO AN RRSP OR RRIF

Page 19: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

19PAGE - 19-

THE PROPOSAL(CONTINUED)

INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS (CONTINUED)Ø POSSIBLE TAX-SHELTERING OPTIONS

4. EVERYONE

Ø CASH PAYMENT

Ø TRY TO STAGGER PAYMENTS OVER TWO

CALENDAR YEARS?Ø TAXABLE DEDUCTIONS AT SOURCE

Page 20: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

20PAGE - 20-

THE PROPOSAL(CONTINUED)

INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS (CONTINUED)Ø POSSIBLE TAX-SHELTERING OPTIONS

ALL OPTIONS ARE SUBJECT TO ACCEPTANCE BYCANADA CUSTOMS AND REVENUE AGENCY (CCRA)

(FORMERLY REVENUE CANADA)

Page 21: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

21PAGE - 21-

ACTUARIAL VALUE OF PENSION

Ø AMOUNT REQUIRED TO FUND FUTURE PENSION PLAN

BENEFITS, (BASED ON SERVICE TO JULY 1, 2000 FOR ACTIVE

MEMBERS)

Ø TAKES ACCOUNT OF FUTURE INVESTMENT INCOME (AT 6.5%)

Ø REFLECTS POSSIBLE FUTURE SALARY INCREASES (AT AN

ASSUMED RATE OF 5.5%)

Ø INCLUDES SURVIVOR AND OTHER DEATH BENEFITS

Ø INCLUDES TERMINATION OF EMPLOYMENT BENEFITS

Page 22: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

22PAGE - 22-

LIABILITIES & SURPLUS SHARINGAS AT JULY 1, 2000

(AMOUNTS IN $1,000'S)

NUMBER

ACTUARIAL VALUE

OF PENSIONS

SURPLUS

SHARE

ACTIVE MEMBERS 2,889 348,165 (53.8%) 40,071

PENSIONERS 1,081 277,087 (42.8%) 32,356

DEFERRED/INACTIVE 391 22,154 (3.4%) 2,573

TOTAL 4,361 647,406 (100.0%) 75,000

Page 23: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

23PAGE - 23-

ACTIVE MEMBER LIABILITIESAND SURPLUS SHARES

(AMOUNTS IN $1,000'S)

NUMBER

ACTUARIAL VALUE

OF PENSIONS

SURPLUS

SHARE

STAFF 1,933 146,055 (22.6%) 16,886

NON-CLINICAL FACULTY 759 160,218 (24.7%) 18,384

CLINICAL FACULTY 124 32,318 (5.0%) 3,703

DISABLED MEMBERS 73 9,574 (1.5%) 1,098

TOTAL 2,889 348,165 (53.8%) 40,071

Page 24: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

24PAGE - 24-

MAIN FACTORS AFFECTING ACTUARIALVALUE OF PENSION

Ø ACTIVE MEMBERSAGE

SALARY

YEARS OF SERVICE

Ø PENSIONERSAGE

PENSION AMOUNT

SPOUSE'S AGE (IF APPLICABLE)

Ø DEFERRED MEMBERSAGE, PENSION AMOUNT

Page 25: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

25PAGE - 25-

SURPLUS SHARE EXAMPLESACTIVE MEMBERS

AGE

YEARS OF

SERVICE SALARY

ACTUARIAL

VALUE

SURPLUS

SHARE

#1 25 1 $32,000 $2,700 $750

#2 40 15 $45,000 $95,600 $10,500

#3 40 15 $80,000 $179,800 $19,800

#4 60 15 $45,000 $118,100 $13,000

#5 60 30 $100,000 $423,100 $46,500NOTE: AMOUNTS ARE APPROXIMATIONS ONLY

Page 26: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

26PAGE - 26-

SURPLUS SHARE EXAMPLESPENSIONERS

AGE

SPOUSE

AGE

MONTHLY

PENSION

ACTUARIAL

VALUE

SURPLUS

SHARE

#1 55 58 $2,100 $389,900 $42,900

#2 65 63 $4,100 $692,000 $76,100

#3 75 N/A $270 $24,400 $5,000

#4 75 73 $4,100 $489,800 $53,900

#5 90 N/A $650 $38,000 $5,000

#6 90 88 $4,100 $243,000 $26,700NOTE: AMOUNTS ARE APPROXIMATIONS ONLY

Page 27: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

27PAGE - 27-

BUY-BACK OF INITIAL UNIVERSITYSERVICE

Ø AVAILABLE ONLY TO ACTIVE MEMBERS ON

DISTRIBUTION DATE

Ø UP TO 18 MONTHS MAY BE AVAILABLE

Ø INCREASES FUTURE PENSION/TERMINATION/DEATH

BENEFITS

Ø PRICED ON FAVOURABLE BASIS

(ASSUMES SINGLE MALE RETIRING AT AGE 65)

Ø USE TABLE TO ESTIMATE COST OF BUY-BACK

Page 28: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

28PAGE - 28-

BUY-BACK EXAMPLE

1. CALCULATE SERVICE BEFORE ENROLMENT DATE (E.G. 0.5YEARS)

2. ESTIMATE COST OF BUYING BACK ONE YEAR FROM

TABLE

(E.G. $2,734 AT AGE 45WITH $40,000PENSIONABLEEARNINGS)

3. MULTIPLY TO GET BUY-BACK COST(e.g. 0.5 X $2,734 = $1,367)

Page 29: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

29PAGE - 29-

BUY-BACK EXAMPLE(Continued)

Ø SURPLUS SHARE IN EXCESS OF BUY-BACK COSTPAYABLE IN CASH (MAY BE TRANSFERRED TO RRSP IFYOU HAVE CONTRIB. ROOM)

Ø PARTIAL BUY-BACK IF BUY-BACK COST EXCEEDSSURPLUS SHARE

Page 30: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

30PAGE - 30-

REFUND OF PRE-1991 CONTRIBUTIONS

Ø AVAILABLE ONLY TO PENSIONERS AND DEFERRED

VESTEDS

Ø AMOUNT SHOWN ON SURPLUS SHARING STATEMENT

Ø UP TO AGE 69, MAY BE TRANSFERRED TAX-FREE TO

RRSP/RRIF

Ø ABOVE AGE 69, MAY BE TRANSFERRED TAX-FREE TO RRIF

Page 31: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

31PAGE - 31-

REFUND OF PRE-1991 CONTRIBUTIONS(Continued)

Ø SURPLUS SHARE IN EXCESS OF PRE-1991 CONTRIBUTIONS

PAYABLE IN CASH (TRANSFERABLE TO RRSP IF YOU HAVE

ROOM)

Ø PARTIAL REFUND IF SURPLUS SHARE LESS THAN PRE-1991CONTRIBUTION AMOUNT

Page 32: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

32PAGE - 32-

REFUND OF PRE-1991 CONTRIBUTIONSFOR ACTIVE MEMBERS?

Ø CCRA POSITION - NOT POSSIBLE IF FUTURE MEMBER

CONTRIBUTIONS REQUIRED

Ø MAY BE POSSIBLE FOR MEMBERS TERMINATED SINCE JULY

2000

Ø EVEN IF PERMITTED BY CCRA, PROBLEMATIC DUE TO

POSSIBLE IMPACT ON FUTURE TERMINATION /RETIREMENT BENEFITS

Page 33: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

33PAGE - 33-

THE PROPOSAL(CONTINUED)

OTHER ELEMENTS OF THE PROPOSAL:

Ø ALL EXPENSES OF COMMITTEE AND UNIVERSITY

PAID FROM PLAN SURPLUS BUFFER AND NOT FROM

SURPLUS SHARES (IF APPROVED BY REGULATOR)

Ø THE MCMASTER UNIVERSITY FUTURES FUND

("MUFF") WILL BE DISCONTINUED AFTER ITS NEXT

EXPIRY DATE (APRIL 30, 2001).

Ø THE PROPOSAL DOES NOT AFFECT ANY FUTURE

AGREEMENTS WITH EMPLOYEE ASSOCIATIONS

Page 34: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

34PAGE - 34-

RECOMMENDATION

Ø THE COMMITTEE RECOMMENDS TO VOTE “YES”

Ø MUSA RECOMMENDS TO VOTE “YES”

Ø MUFA RECOMMENDS TO VOTE “YES”

Ø CFA RECOMMENDS TO VOTE “YES”

Ø MANAGEMENT GROUP RECOMMENDS TO VOTE “YES”

Ø MURA RECOMMENDS TO VOTE “YES”

Page 35: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

35PAGE - 35-

RECOMMENDATION(CONTINUED)

Ø IF YOU VOTE “NO” YOU WILL NOT RECEIVE ANYSURPLUS FROM THIS PROPOSAL AND WILL REMAIN IN ASEPARATE PENSION PLAN FROM EVERYONE ELSE WHOCONSENTED

Ø FAILURE TO VOTE COUNTS AS A “NO” VOTE

Ø IF PROPOSAL RECEIVES LESS THAN 90% SUPPORT FROM THE

ACTIVE EMPLOYEE MEMBERS OR LESS THAN 90% FROM THE

PENSIONER / DEFERRED GROUP, THE UNIVERSITY MAY

CANCEL THE PROPOSAL

Page 36: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

36PAGE - 36-

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?

IF THE PROPOSAL IS ACCEPTED BY THE MEMBERSHIP:

Ø KOSKIE MINSKY, WITH THE APPROVAL OF THE COMMITTEE,WILL FINALIZE A DETAILED SURPLUS SHARING AGREEMENT

WITH THE UNIVERSITY WHICH IS AS GOOD AS THE

PROPOSAL, AND SIGN IT ON BEHALF OF THOSE WHO HAVE

RETAINED THEM TO SIGN

Ø IF PROPOSAL RECEIVES BETWEEN 90% AND 100% SUPPORT

THE UNIVERSITY WILL ESTABLISH A SEPARATE PLAN FOR

THOSE WHO CONSENT. BENEFITS UNDER THIS PLAN WILL BE

IDENTICAL TO THE CURRENT PLAN.

Page 37: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

37PAGE - 37-

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?(CONTINUED)

IF THE PROPOSAL IS ACCEPTED BY THE MEMBERSHIP

(CONTINUED):

Ø COURT PROCEEDING TO APPROVE THE AGREEMENT WILL BE

INITIATED

Ø APPLICATION FOR SURPLUS WITHDRAWAL WILL BE FILED

WITH THE SUPERINTENDENT

Ø THE AUTHORIZATIONS WILL ALLOW KOSKIE MINSKY TO

REPRESENT YOU BEFORE THE COURTS AND TRIBUNALS

Page 38: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

38PAGE - 38-

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?(CONTINUED)

IF THE PROPOSAL IS ACCEPTED BY THE MEMBERSHIP

(CONTINUED):

Ø APPROVALS MUST BE OBTAINED FROM CCRA

Ø MEMBERS WILL BE SENT PAYMENT OPTIONS, WHICH MUST

BE EXERCISED PRIOR TO SUPERINTENDENT’S CONSENT

Ø PAYMENTS OF SURPLUS ENTITLEMENTS ARE EXPECTED BY

WINTER 2001/2002. PAYMENTS MUST START BY END OF

THE YEAR IN ORDER TO BE STAGGERED.

Page 39: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

39PAGE - 39-

WHAT HAPPENS NEXT?(CONTINUED)

IF THE PROPOSAL IS NOT ACCEPTED BY THE

MEMBERSHIP:

Ø THE UNIVERSITY HAS THE OPTION TO CANCEL THE DEAL

Ø THE UNIVERSITY HAS INDICATED THAT IT DOES NOT INTEND

TO RE-NEGOTIATE ANOTHER SURPLUS SHARING PROPOSAL

Page 40: M C M A S T E R E M P L O Y E E S ’ P E N S IO N S C · l egal o pinion re: s urplus (c ont.) Ø l egal counsel reviewed all historical plan documentation, and funding agreements

40PAGE - 40-

IN CONCLUSION…

1. MEMBERS SHOULD SIGN BALLOTS

(AUTHORIZATION AND RETAINER)

2. RETURN BALLOTS TO KOSKIE MINSKY NO LATER THAN

APRIL 30, 2001

3. KOSKIE MINSKY CAN BE REACHED AT:• 1-888-233-2852• [email protected]

4. PLEASE HELP US FIND MEMBERS WE HAVE BEEN UNABLE

TO LOCATE

K:\Pension\1999\990931\Slideshow\Slideshow Draft #5.doc