m & a 3

Upload: bhumikasem1

Post on 03-Apr-2018

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/29/2019 M & A 3

    1/9

    3/28/2013

    1

    CASE STUDY

    on

    RIL-RPL MERGER

    and

    TATA-JAGUAR ACQUISITION

    MERGER & ACQUISITION

    SUBMITTED BY:

    1. MISTRY OJAL (117500592001)

    2. MEHTA SHRADDHA (117500592004)

    3. KABRA KETAN (117500592039)

    4. JASANI PAYAL (117500592042)

    5. MEHTA NIKITA (117500592046)

    SUBMITTED TO:

    MS. POOJA PATEL

    3/28/2013 2

    Agenda

    Concept of Merger

    A case of merger of RIL & RPL

    Concept of Acquisition

    A case of acquisition of J aguar & Land Rover by TataMotors

    3/28/2013 3

    Concept of Merger

    A merger is a strategywheretwo companies agreeto combine theiroperations. Once merger happens, one company survives and theotherloses its corporateidentity

    Merger through absorption:

    Absorption is a combination of two or more companies into anexisting company. All companies except one lose their identity in

    sucha merger

    3/28/2013 4

  • 7/29/2019 M & A 3

    2/9

    3/28/2013

    2

    Cont

    Types o fmergers

    HORIZONTAL VERTICALCONGLOMERATE

    3/28/2013 5

    Glance at both entities:RelianceIndustries Limited(RIL)

    India's largest private sector company on all major financial

    parameters It is the first private sector company from India to feature in the

    Fortune Global 500 list of 'World's Largest Corporations' and ranks103rdamongsttheworld's Top 200companies in terms ofprofits

    ReliancePetroleum Limited (RPL)

    It is a subsidiaryofReliance IndustriesL imited

    With an annual crude processing capacity of 580,000 barrels perstream day (BPSD), RP L will be the sixth largest refinery in theworld

    3/28/2013 6

    Merger of RIL and RPLMerger of RIL and RPL

    3/28/2013 7

    Cont

    On 8th April 2002 the merger received a nod from the directors ofRILanRPL

    They have recommended an exchange ratio of one share of RIL forevery11shares ofRP L

    Under the proposed terms of themerger, shares ofRPL held byRIL,representing28%ofRPLs equitysharecapital, cancelled

    RPL shares held by other RIL associates, representing 14% ofRPLs equity share capital, exchanged into RIL shares, andconstituted4.7% of the fully diluted equity share capital of RIL, witha value of over Rs. 2,100 crores (US$ 0.43 billion) at prevalentmarketprices

    3/28/2013 8

  • 7/29/2019 M & A 3

    3/9

    3/28/2013

    3

    Synergy o f Merger

    Sales Tax benefit

    TaxshieldBenefit

    Strong Balance Sheet of thecombinedentity

    RiskDiversification

    3/28/2013 9

    Impact of Merger (2002)

    largestlandmark in Indiancorporatehistory

    Turnover:Rs 58,000crore (US$ 13.84bn)

    AnnualizedNetP rofit:Rs 4,000crore (US$ 954mn)

    Total Sales:3 percentof India's GDP

    Tax Contribution: 10 per cent of total indirect tax revenues of theCentral government

    Total Exports: 5 percentof India's totalexports

    Cont...

    In April 2002,boardofRIL approved a proposal tomergeRP L

    The company's share price as also the benchmark index Sensexreactednegatively

    RIL shares had dropped 2.85per centtoRs 312.95

    RIL had stated that the deal would lead to a 32 per cent increase inRIL's equity

    But it was notsuccessful attempt,whichresults intomerger of RIL andRPL in2009again

    Merger of RIL-RPL (2008-2009)

    SchemeScheme ofof MergerMerger::

    Present RPL was incorporated in October 24, 2005 to set up thesecondmega refinerycomplex

    The merger was expected to happen owing to the strategic fit and thechangesin the global scenario

    To enjoy Economies of Scale in production and refinery ofpetrochemicals

    To minimizethecostof capital

    To capitalize thecashflowof RPL

  • 7/29/2019 M & A 3

    4/9

    3/28/2013

    4

    The merger resultedin the creationofa petrochemicalbehemothwhichencompassedtheentirevaluechain in the businessof petroleum

    The merger created a new entity having combined market value ofaboutRs.233,384crores

    After the merger, became one of the worlds largest refineries havinglargestcapacityat a single location

    Becamethe fifthlargestpolypropylene manufacturer

    Cont...Two firms function as separate entities from the accounting point ofview

    The taxbenefits available to RIL as an Export Oriented Unit & to RPLasa Special EconomicZone

    GaveRIL greater flexibilityin operational planning

    RPL had its IPO in April2006where RIL had 75%stake

    In November 2007 only it became almost clear that RIL might take astepofmergingRPL

    Cont...

    1.Synergy

    Combined entity can often reduce the fixed costs and otheroperatingcosts

    Thenatureof theexisting refineryandthe newrefineryis same

    So, the improved capacity and the complexity would give RIL the

    necessaryreductionin the costs ofoperations

    2.Increased revenueor marketshare

    The merger would increase its market power by capturingincreasedmarketsharetosetprices

    Reasons for MergerCont...Cont...

    3. Economyof scale

    Merged entity would be the worlds largest refining capacity at asinglelocation

    4.Taxation

    Taxbenefits is anothermajor incentive

    Butheremerger will betaxneutral

    Boththeentitieswillcontinueto enjoy the same tax benefits

    3/28/2013 16

  • 7/29/2019 M & A 3

    5/9

    3/28/2013

    5

    Swap ratio

    1:16

    Forevery 16shares ofRPL, 1 share ofRIL issuedofrs 10.

    CRISIL gave ratingof AAA toRIL share

    4.4% increase in equity base from Rs 1,574 crore shares to Rs1,643crore

    Resultedin the fall inthepromoterholdingby2%from49% to47%

    equitywill bedilutedduetothemerger totheextentof2. %

    3/28/2013 17

    Pr om ot er s No n p ro mo ter s

    Stake% 75.39 24.62

    No of shares 339.21 110.79

    No of new shares

    as per swap ratio

    21.20 6.92

    Particulars Pre

    merger

    Post

    merger

    Promoters' shares 49 46

    Held by RIL Subsidiaries 6 5.7

    Banks and FIs 6.5 6.9

    MF 2.5 2.7

    FIIs 15.5 15.1

    Depository receipts 3.7 3.6

    Public 16.7 19

    total 100 1003/28/2013

    18

    Post merger results

    TransformedRIL tobeamongworlds50mostprofitable companies

    gainedsignificantlyfromhigher financialstrengthand flexibility

    Produced 1.24millionbarrels ofoil a day

    Helped the combined entity to save on income tax and dividenddistributiontax

    createdhugemarketvalueofa whoppingRs 2,33,000cr.

    Increased the cost efficiency as merger brought down the costs ofInter-company transfers & operational costs which further lead toimprovingthe financialefficiency

    3/28/2013 19

    ACQUISITION Acquisition refers to a situation where one firm acquires another and the

    later ceases to exist

    An acquisition occurs when one company takes controlling, interest in

    another firm or its legal subsidiary or selected assets of another firm

    A firm that attempts to acquire or merge with another company is called an

    acquiringcompany

    A targetcompanyis a firm that is being solicited bytheacquiring company

    The assets ofthe dissolved firm would be owned bytheacquiring firm

    The shareholders of the dissolved firmare paid either cash orgiven shares

    in acquiring company

    3/28/2013 20

  • 7/29/2019 M & A 3

    6/9

    3/28/2013

    6

    3/28/2013 21

    A Bird view

    Location: Mumbai, India (HQ)

    Founded: J R D Tata in1945

    Competitors: Maruti, M&M,

    AshokLeyland

    Brandnames: NANO, Starbus

    CEO: Ratan Tata

    Location: Dearborn,Michigan

    Founded: 1903byHenryFord

    Competitors: General Motors,

    Toyota

    Brand names: Volvo, Mazda,

    J aguar and LandRover

    CEO: AlanMulally3/28/2013 22

    3/28/2013 23

    Why Ford wanted to sell ?

    J aguar had not made any profit for ford, so they started calling

    J aguar asdog

    Even though LR made 18% profit, nevertheless it is not what ford

    wanted

    Bringing down production costs and turning around the company

    successfullywas the challenge- a testthatFordfailed

    Fordmadetheheaviest loss in 2006 i.e. $12.6 billion in its 103-year

    history

    3/28/2013 24

    12thJune2007

    Announcement from Ford that it plans to sell Land Rover andJ aguar

    August2007

    Major bidders were identified namely; Tata Motors, M&M, Ceribruscapital Management, TPG Capital,

    Apollo Management

    3rdJan2008

    Ford announced Tatas as the preferred bidders

    26thMarch2008

    Ford agreed to sell its J aguar Land Rover operations to TataMotors

    2ndJune2008

    The acquisition was complete

    The Deal Process

  • 7/29/2019 M & A 3

    7/9

    3/28/2013

    7

    How the deal was finances?

    $ 2.3billionpaid toford

    $ 0.7billion

    towardsWC

    $ 3 billionbridgeloan

    SPV 1: TMLHoldingPte Ltd.

    SPV 2 : J aguar LandRover Ltd.

    TaMo raised $ 3 billion bridge loan from C iti

    groupand J P Morgan fora period of15 months

    $ 2.3 billion was paid directly to Ford to acquire

    fullownershipof J aguar &LandRover

    rest$ 0.7billion as an operatingcashforJ LR

    3/28/2013 25

    Tata Motors

    SPV 1

    Singapore

    SPV 2

    UK

    Ford

    How TaMo planned to re-finance $ 3billion bridge loan

    3/28/2013 26

    Actual re-financing of bridge loan

    3/28/2013 27

    Why did TATA go for JLR?

    TaMos' long-term strategy included consolidating its position in the

    domestic Indian market and expanding its international footprint by

    leveraging on in-house capabilities and products and also through

    acquisitionsandstrategiccollaborations

    TaMo stood to gain on several fronts from the deal - the acquisition

    helped the company acquire a global footprint and enter the high-

    end premier segment of the global automobile market. After the

    acquisition, TaMo owns the world's cheapest car - the Nano, and

    luxurycars like the J aguar and LandRover

    3/28/2013 28

  • 7/29/2019 M & A 3

    8/9

    3/28/2013

    8

    Gains to TATA from the deal

    1. It got two advance design studios and technology as part of the

    deal, which provided access to latest technology andallowedTata

    toimprove theircore products in India

    2. Tata got an instant recognition and credibility across globe which

    otherwisewould havetaken years

    3. The costcompetitive advantageas Corus was the main supplier of

    automotive high grade steel to J LR and other automobile industry

    inUS and Europe3/28/2013 29

    Cont..

    4. It helpedTaMo diversify its dependence in Indian markets (which

    contributed to 90% of TATAs revenue). Along with it TATAs

    footprints in South East Asia helped J LR diversify its geographic

    dependencefromUS (30% of volumes) andWestern Europe (55%

    ofvolumes)

    3/28/2013 30

    Was the deal really worth it?

    Morgan Stanley reported that J LRs acquisition appeared negative for

    TaMo, as it hadincreased the earnings volatility, giventhe difficult economic

    conditions in thekey markets ofJ LR includingthe US andE urope

    TaMohad toincura huge capital expenditure as itplannedto investanother

    US$ 1 billion in J LR in addition to the US$ 2.3 billion it had spent on the

    acquisition

    TaMo had also incurred huge capital expenditure on the development and

    launch of Nano

    This, coupled with the downturn in the global automobile industry, was

    expected to impactthe profitability of thecompany

    3/28/2013 31

    Has the deal made JLR prof itable?

    3/28/2013 32

    ( millions, unless stated) Year Ended 31 March

    2011 2010 C hange

    R etail Volumes (000 units) 241 208 16%

    Wholesale Volumes (000 units) 244 194 26%

    Revenues 9,871 6,527 3,344

    EBITDA 1,502 350 1,152

    EBITDA % 15.2% 5.4% 9.8%

    Net income before tax 1,115 51 1,064

    Free Cash Flow 876 (101) 977

    Cash 1,028 680 348

    Debt (incl. pref, shares) 1,382 3,030 (1,648)

    Net debt 354 2,350 (1,996)

  • 7/29/2019 M & A 3

    9/9

    3/28/2013

    9

    THANK YOU