lulucf cdm small-scale projects -small-scale energy projects -current draft text in sbsta/2003/l.13...

10
LULUCF CDM small-scale projects -Small-scale energy projects -Current draft text in SBSTA/2003/L.13 -Simplified procedures for energy projects -Potential savings from simplified procedures -How large is small-scale? UNEP-IUCN-FAO „CDM and Forestry“ Addis Oct 2003 Jens Mackensen

Upload: kelley-booker

Post on 14-Jan-2016

220 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: LULUCF CDM small-scale projects -Small-scale energy projects -Current draft text in SBSTA/2003/L.13 -Simplified procedures for energy projects -Potential

LULUCF CDM small-scale projects

-Small-scale energy projects

-Current draft text in SBSTA/2003/L.13

-Simplified procedures for energy projects

-Potential savings from simplified procedures

-How large is small-scale?UN

EP-I

UC

N-F

AO

„C

DM

an

d F

ore

stry

“ A

dd

is O

ct

20

03

Jens Mackensen

Page 2: LULUCF CDM small-scale projects -Small-scale energy projects -Current draft text in SBSTA/2003/L.13 -Simplified procedures for energy projects -Potential

Energy projects that are eligible for simplified modalities and procedures include:

 (i)  Renewable energy projects activities with a maximum output capacity equivalent of up to 15 megawatts (or an appropriate equivalent);

(ii) Energy efficiency improvement project activities which reduce energy consumption, on the supply and/or demand side, by up to the equivalent of 15 gigawatt/hours per year;

(iii) Other projects activities that both reduce anthropogenic emissions by sources and directly emit less than 15 kilotonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent annually.U

NE

P-I

UC

N-F

AO

„C

DM

an

d F

ore

stry

“ A

dd

is O

ct

20

03

Page 3: LULUCF CDM small-scale projects -Small-scale energy projects -Current draft text in SBSTA/2003/L.13 -Simplified procedures for energy projects -Potential

Baseline establishment (Paragraph 24d, FCCC/SBSTA/2003/L.13)  

“[In the case of afforestation and reforestation project activities under the CDM that [remove at most 15 kilotonnes of CO2 equivalent per year] [or] [are implemented in an area of less than [XX] hectares,] in accordance with simplified procedures developed for such activities;]”

UN

EP-I

UC

N-F

AO

„C

DM

an

d F

ore

stry

“ A

dd

is O

ct

20

03

Page 4: LULUCF CDM small-scale projects -Small-scale energy projects -Current draft text in SBSTA/2003/L.13 -Simplified procedures for energy projects -Potential

Monitoring (Paragraph 31d, FCCC/SBSTA/2003/L.13)  

“[In the case of afforestation and reforestation project activities under the CDM that [remove at most 15 kilotonnes of CO2 equivalent per year] [or] [are implemented in an area of less than [XX] hectares, follows simplified monitoring procedures developed for such activities;]]”.

UN

EP-I

UC

N-F

AO

„C

DM

an

d F

ore

stry

“ A

dd

is O

ct

20

03

Page 5: LULUCF CDM small-scale projects -Small-scale energy projects -Current draft text in SBSTA/2003/L.13 -Simplified procedures for energy projects -Potential

Simplified modalities and procedures for energy small-scale projects include the following: 

•Project activities may be bundled, but total size of bundle should not exceed limits stipulated in paragraph 6 (c ) of decision 17/CP.7;

•Requirements for Project Design Document are reduced;

•Baselines methodologies are simplified;

•Monitoring plans are simplified;

•Same operational entity may undertake validation, verification and certification;

•CDM Executive Board may propose lower share of proceeds to cover administrative costs and registration fees.U

NE

P-I

UC

N-F

AO

„C

DM

an

d F

ore

stry

“ A

dd

is O

ct

20

03

Page 6: LULUCF CDM small-scale projects -Small-scale energy projects -Current draft text in SBSTA/2003/L.13 -Simplified procedures for energy projects -Potential

Search costs (fixed) Negotiation costs (degressive)Baseline determination costs (fixed)Approval costs (fixed) Validation costs (fixed) Review costs Registration costs (fixed) Monitoring costs (fixed) Verification costs (degressive)Review costs Certification costs (degressive) Enforcement costs (proportional) Transfer costs Registration costs

Adopted from Michaelowa & Stronzik, 2002

UN

EP-I

UC

N-F

AO

„C

DM

an

d F

ore

stry

“ A

dd

is O

ct

20

03

Page 7: LULUCF CDM small-scale projects -Small-scale energy projects -Current draft text in SBSTA/2003/L.13 -Simplified procedures for energy projects -Potential

For small-scale projects (2-20 Kilotonnes CO2 equivalent per year) transactions

costs are estimated to reach up to 10 Euro per t CO2). Michaelowa & Stronzik (2002) estimate that the minimum fixed costs for any CDM project amounts to 150,000 Euro, of which costs for baseline determination and monitoring represent approximately 30%.

UN

EP-I

UC

N-F

AO

„C

DM

an

d F

ore

stry

“ A

dd

is O

ct

20

03

Page 8: LULUCF CDM small-scale projects -Small-scale energy projects -Current draft text in SBSTA/2003/L.13 -Simplified procedures for energy projects -Potential

MethodLocatelli & Pedroni, 2003

Median value (ha)

% of profitable projects <500 ha

% of profitable projects <1000 ha

Ton-year

11,000 0% 2.8%

ACS 3,000 5.1% 17.7%

TCER1 2,300 13.7% 30.2%

TCER2 3,250 9.7% 23.1%

UN

EP-I

UC

N-F

AO

„C

DM

an

d F

ore

stry

“ A

dd

is O

ct

20

03

Page 9: LULUCF CDM small-scale projects -Small-scale energy projects -Current draft text in SBSTA/2003/L.13 -Simplified procedures for energy projects -Potential

Extreme condition

Ton-year

ACS TCER1 TCER2

Crediting period only 10 years

275,000 14,200 3,000 50,000

CER price of only 3$/tCO2

30,000 6,750 4,500 6,550

Highest transaction costs

18,550 5,650 3,700 5,000

2% risk discounting per year

11,000 5,150 2,400 3,250

CER price to increase 3% per year

11,000 3,000 14,550 30,000

Without any condition

11,000 3,000 2,300 3,250

(Locatelli and Pedroni, 2003)

UN

EP-I

UC

N-F

AO

„C

DM

an

d F

ore

stry

“ A

dd

is O

ct

20

03

Page 10: LULUCF CDM small-scale projects -Small-scale energy projects -Current draft text in SBSTA/2003/L.13 -Simplified procedures for energy projects -Potential

Thank you

Jens Mackensen, PhDUN Environment Programme

[email protected]

++254 20 62 42 51/32 83

UN

EP-I

UC

N-F

AO

„C

DM

an

d F

ore

stry

“ A

dd

is O

ct

20

03