ltr-nrc-17-23 np-attachment - supporting information for ...ltr-nrc-17-23 np-attachment - supporting...

19
Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3 L TR-NRC-17-23 NP-Attachment Supporting Information for the NRC Audit of the D5 CPR Correlation (Non-Proprietary) March 2017 Westinghouse Electric Company 1000 Westinghouse Drive Cranberry Township, PA 16066 © 20 17 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved

Upload: others

Post on 24-Jan-2021

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

    L TR-NRC-17-23 NP-Attachment

    Supporting Information for the NRC Audit of the D5 CPR Correlation (Non-Proprietary)

    March 2017

    Westinghouse Electric Company 1000 Westinghouse Drive

    Cranberry Township, PA 16066

    © 20 17 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC All Rights Reserved

  • @Westinghouse 1

  • ,.....-------------------- - ----

    • Introduction

    • Purpose and Desired Outcome

    • Day 1 - RAI 36

    • Day 2 - RAI 36 I Other RAI Discussions

    • Day 3 - RAI 36 I Other RAI Discussions

    • Summary and Closeout

    @Westinghouse 2

  • • Meeting Location and Emergency Response protocol - Building exits and muster point

    • March Nuclear Safety Culture Trait at Westinghouse:

    Decision Making

    Attributes: • DM.1 Consistent Processes

    • DM.2 Conservative Bias

    • DM.3 Accountability for Decisions

    @Westinghouse 3

  • Audit Participants

    - Westinghouse : • Uffe Bergmann • Juan Casal • Patricia Quaglia • Jean-Marie Le Corre (by phone) • Gunilla Norback (by phone) • Ed Mercier • Brad Maurer

    - NRC: • Joshua Kaizer • Reed Anzalone • Josh Whitman • John Lehning • Kate Lenning

    @Westinghouse 4

  • • Purpose of the Audit - Discuss the outstanding RAls related to the review of

    WCAP-17794-P (05 CPR Correlation)

    • Desired Outcome - Reach a common understanding regarding responses to

    the RAls which will enable completion of a successful review for the topical report going forward

    @Westinghouse 5

  • @Westinghouse 6

  • • Requests for Additional Information (35) - Responses submitted August 2016 - Additional RAls:

    • RAI 36 - November 2016 • RAI 37 - with Audit Plan

    • Resolutions - RA Is resolved ( 21 ) - 1 , 2, 5, 8, 1 0, 11 , 12, 1 3, 14, 1 5, 1 6, 1 9,

    21, 23, 24,26,27, 30, 31, 32, and 35

    • To Be Addressed in the Audit - Require further discussion (7) - 7, 9, 20, 22, 25, 33, and 34 - Supporting Information provided to aid discussion (9) - 3, 4,

    6, 17, 18, 28, 29, and 36, 37

    @Westinghouse 7

  • L

    • CPR Critical Power Ratio

    • FRIGG Thermal-Hydraulic Test Loop at the Westinghouse Facilities in Vasteras, Sweden

    • SLMCPR Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio

    • TC Thermocouple

    @Westinghouse 8

  • Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

    RAls 3, 28, 37 © 2017 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved

    L TR-NRC-17-23 NP-Attachment

    Data statistics supporting RAI 3 • •

    @Westinghouse 9

  • @Westinghouse 10

  • Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

    RAls 3, 28, 37 © 2017 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved

    L TR-NRC-17-23 NP-Attachment

    - Data statistics supporting RAI 37 - . ~ ~

    a,b,c

    @Westinghouse 11

  • @Westinghouse 12

  • Westinghouse Non-Proprietary Class 3

    RAls 3, 28, 37 Summary and Discussion

    @Westinghouse 13

    © 2017 Westinghouse Electric Company LLC. All Rights Reserved

    L TR-NRC-17-23 NP-Attachment

  • @Westinghouse 14

  • • Frequency of TCs registering dryout at Spacer 2, coincident with TCs at other elevations, is[ ]'d~ring the cosine test

    • Repeated data points at[

    Jae radial power distribution are shown below (same as discussed in

    previous RAI answer, but now labelled according to TC elevation) - No trend observed in CPR error for dryout registered by TCs at Spacer 2

    a,b,c

    @Westinghouse 15

  • • Repeat tests were performed at[ r·c subcooling, and at specific flow levels. The radial power distribution was as close to[

    Ja,c • In principle the repeat points are taken at the same

    conditions, but to account for any small deviations, a comparison of CPR is more appropriate than comparing the measured critical powers directly

    [ ]a,c

    • Hence, the derived standard deviation of is indeed representative of (only) the measurement uncertainty (since nearly identical input conditions were used in the CPR correlation)

    @Westinghouse 16

  • • Heat losses were experimentally determined after the latest upgrade of the FRIGG loop, and have since then been applied generically in later tests.

    = [ r·c • The heat losses are applied directly to the measured critical power, thus

    reducing it by[ Ja,c a,c • As part of FRIGG procedures a heat balance test is

    performed before each test campaign to verify applicability of the above values Ja,c - Conditions: [ different

    powers - Example test matrix applied before the cosine test is

    shown on right. It covers changes in outlet temperature of( Ja,c @Westinghouse

    17

  • @Westinghouse 18