low cost transceiver for ultra dense wdm access networks
DESCRIPTION
These are the slides presented during the talk with same title, at NOC 2009 conference.There we proposed and demonstrated a DPSK homodyne receiver architecture based on a simple phase-diversity set-up with analog processing. Due to its spectral properties, it remarkably increases the phase noise tolerance of more conventional homodyne receivers. Also it can achieve high sensitivity and is integrable.TRANSCRIPT
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
-- --G
CO
GC
OG
CO
GC
O
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)Dept. of Signal Theory and Communications (TSC)
Optical Communications Group (GCO)www.tsc.upc.edu/gco
Univ
ers
itat
Politè
cnic
ade C
ata
lunya
Low Cost Homodyne Transceiver Low Cost Homodyne Transceiver
for Ultrafor Ultra--Dense WDM Access Dense WDM Access
NetworksNetworks
Josep MJosep MJosep MJosep Mªªªª FFFFààààbregabregabregabrega and Josep Pratand Josep Pratand Josep Pratand Josep [email protected]
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
OutlineOutlineOutlineOutline
� Introduction
� Receiver Performances
∙ Phase Noise
∙ Channel spacing
� Case study: WDM tree PON
� Conclusions
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
IntroductionIntroductionIntroductionIntroduction
� Migration from TDM/WDM to pure WDM
� Ultra-dense WDM PONs
∙ Multiple low capacity channels
� E.g. 1 Gbps
λ
More than 1500 ch. at C band
...........................
3 GHz
[1] C.-H. Lee, et al., J. Lightwave Technol., vol. 24, no. 12, pp. 4568-4583, Dec. 2006.
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
IntroductionIntroductionIntroductionIntroduction
∙ IM-DD systems limited
� Sensitivity
�Optical filters selectivity
∙ Coherent systems
�Heterodyne
– Image frequency problems
�Homodyne
– Phase locking problems LocalLaser
+
-
+
-OpticalInput Ip(t)
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
IntroductionIntroductionIntroductionIntroduction
Locallaser
+
-
Data and Phase
recovery
PM
Data
DataReceiver
TransceiverPSK Downstream
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
OutlineOutlineOutlineOutline
� Introduction
� ReceiverReceiverReceiverReceiver PerformancesPerformancesPerformancesPerformances
∙ Phase Noise
∙ Channel spacing
� Case study: WDM tree PON
� Conclusions
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
TimeTimeTimeTime----SwitchingSwitchingSwitchingSwitching PhasePhasePhasePhase DiversityDiversityDiversityDiversity ReceiverReceiverReceiverReceiver
Laser
CLKRecovery
+
-
PhaseScrambler
Tb
Tb
Tb/2
Data out
OpticalInput
I’
Q’
Vout
+
I’
Q’
outV
[2] J. Prat and J. M. Fabrega, ECOC 2005, Glasgow, Scotland, sept. 2005, paper We.P.104
0º
90º
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
Time Time Time Time SwitchingSwitchingSwitchingSwitching PhasePhasePhasePhase DiversityDiversityDiversityDiversity ReceiverReceiverReceiverReceiver
� Diversity achieved by switching local laser phase [1]
� Achieved high tolerance to laser linewidth with simple architecture [2] and narrow channel spacing [3]
� 3 dB penalty with respect to an ideal homodynesystem due to the phase switching
� Similar structure has been integrated on a chip [4]
I Q
t0 t0+T/2 t0+Tt
I Q
t0+3T/2 t0+2T
[2] J. Prat and J. M. Fabrega, ECOC 2005, Glasgow, Scotland, sept. 2005, paper We.P.104 [3] J. M. Fabrega and J. Prat, OSA Optics Letters, vol. 32, no. 5, March 2007[4] J. M. Fabrega and J. Prat, OSA Optics Letters, vol. 34, no. 4, February 2009[5] J. Klamkin, et al., in Proceedings LEOS 2007, pp. 40-41
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
TimeTimeTimeTime----SwitchingSwitchingSwitchingSwitching PhasePhasePhasePhase DiversityDiversityDiversityDiversity ReceiverReceiverReceiverReceiver
-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
-1 -0,5 0 0,5 1-1
-0,5
0
0,5
1
-1 -0,5 0 0,5 1
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( )
2 2 2 2 31 2
2 1 31 2 1 2 1 3
1 2
( ) ( )( ) ( )( ) ' ( ) ' 1 sin sin
2 2
( ) ( )1cos 2 ( ) 2cos ( ) ( ) sin sin ( ) ( ) sin ( ) ( )
2 2
1sin 2 ( ) 2sin ( ) ( ) sin
2
out b
e
e
t tt tV C d t d t T
t tt t t t t t t
t t t
φ φφ φ
φ φφ φ φ φ φ φ φ
φ φ φ
∆ + ∆ ∆ + ∆ = − − − +
∆ + ∆ + ∆ + ∆ + ∆ + ∆ ∆ + ∆ +
+ ∆ + ∆ ( ) ( )2 1 31 2 1 3
( ) ( )cos ( ) ( ) sin ( ) ( )
2
t tt t t t
φ φ φ φ φ φ ∆ + ∆ − ∆ + ∆ ∆ + ∆
1( ) ( )
2b
e e
Tt t tφ φ φ ∆ = − −
( )2 ( )
2b
e e b
Tt t t Tφ φ φ ∆ = − − −
( )3
3( )
2b
e b e
Tt t T tφ φ φ ∆ = − − −
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
TimeTimeTimeTime----SwitchingSwitchingSwitchingSwitching PhasePhasePhasePhase DiversityDiversityDiversityDiversity ReceiverReceiverReceiverReceiver
Laser
CLKRecovery
+
-
PhaseScrambler
Tb
Data out
ES(t)
Tb/2ELO(t)
IP(t) I f(t)
Post-Processing
Vout
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
OutlineOutlineOutlineOutline
� Introduction
� Receiver Performances
∙ PhasePhasePhasePhase NoiseNoiseNoiseNoise
∙ Channel spacing
� Case study: WDM tree PON
� Conclusions
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
PhasePhasePhasePhase NoiseNoiseNoiseNoise: Experimental : Experimental : Experimental : Experimental SetupSetupSetupSetup
PRBS
CW Laser 1
-
Balancedreceiver
PM
CLK
fiberMZM
0º-180º
0º-90º
ElectricalprocessingOSC
ESA
CW Laser 2
TX
LO
-60
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
0 500 1000 1500 2000
Frequency (MHz)
Pow
er (
dBm
)
Bit rate fixed at 1 Gbps
Data DPSK modulated
CW Laser 1: External Cavity laser @ 100 kHz Linewidth
CW Laser 2: Standard DFB Laser @ 1-30 MHz Linewidth
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
PhasePhasePhasePhase NoiseNoiseNoiseNoise: : : : ResultsResultsResultsResults
� High sensitivity:
∙ -38 dBm sensitivity @ BER 10-9
� High phase noise tolerance:
∙ 18 MHz Linewidth tolerance @ BER 10-3
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
Total laser linewidth (MHz)
log(
BE
R)
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-46 -45 -44 -43 -42 -41 -40 -39 -38
Input power (dBm)
log(
BE
R)
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
OutlineOutlineOutlineOutline
� Introduction
� Receiver Performances
∙ Phase Noise
∙ ChannelChannelChannelChannel spacingspacingspacingspacing
� Case study: WDM tree PON
� Conclusions
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
ChannelChannelChannelChannel SpacingSpacingSpacingSpacing: Experimental : Experimental : Experimental : Experimental SetupSetupSetupSetup
PRBS
CW Laser 1
--
Balancedreceiver
PM
CLK
27 kmfiber
0º-180º
0º-90º
Electricalprocessing
OSC
ESA
CW Laser 2
INT
LO
PM
MZM0º-180º
PRBS
CW Laser 3
TX
Bit rate fixed at 1 Gbps
Data DPSK modulated
CW Laser 1-3: External Cavity laser @ 100 kHz Linewidth
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
ChannelChannelChannelChannel SpacingSpacingSpacingSpacing: : : : ResultsResultsResultsResults
0
2
4
6
8
10
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Channel spacing (GHz)
Pen
alty
(dB
)
Numericalmodel
Ideal system
� 1 dB penalty @ 3 GHz channel spacing
� 3 dB penalty @ <2 GHz channel spacing
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
OutlineOutlineOutlineOutline
� Introduction
� Receiver Performances
∙ Phase Noise
∙ Channel spacing
� CaseCaseCaseCase studystudystudystudy: WDM : WDM : WDM : WDM treetreetreetree PONPONPONPON
� Conclusions
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
CaseCaseCaseCase studystudystudystudy: WDM : WDM : WDM : WDM treetreetreetree PONPONPONPON
Laser
CLKRecovery
PhaseModulator
Tb
Data out
Tb/2MZM
Data in
0º-180º
Optical
Output
Optical
Input
D-WDM MUX
(RN 1)
CO
power splitter(RN 2)
λ1 .. λN D-WDM bands
Nx PONs
λ1 D-WDM band
λN D-W
DM band
K UD-WDM channels
D-WDM band
CPE
CPE
CPE
CPE
CPE
CPE
K users
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
WDM WDM WDM WDM treetreetreetree PON experimentsPON experimentsPON experimentsPON experiments
� Transmission experiments at 1 Gbps
� DPSK modulation format
� 40x32 = 1280 users � > 1 Tbps
� Outside plant losses
∙ AWG 1x40 IL = 6.47dB
∙ 1:32 power splitter IL = 16dB
∙ 25km SMF span IL = 5.2dB
� –38.7 dBm sensitivity @ BER 10-10
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
WDM WDM WDM WDM treetreetreetree PON experimentsPON experimentsPON experimentsPON experiments
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-48 -46 -44 -42 -40 -38 -36
Input power (dBm)
log(
BE
R)
Downstream
Upstream
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
OutlineOutlineOutlineOutline
� Introduction
� Receiver Performances
∙ Phase Noise
∙ Channel spacing
� Case study: WDM tree PON
� ConclusionsConclusionsConclusionsConclusions
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
ConclusionsConclusionsConclusionsConclusions
� A new homodyne receiver was discussed and demonstrated.
� Ideal for a λTTU environment
� Sensitivity of -38 dBm for a BER 10-9, at 1 Gbps
� Linewidth tolerance of 18 MHz linewidth. ∙ FEC codes must be used
� Minimum channel spacing of 3 GHz @ 1 Gbps
� Pure WDM-Tree PON results reported∙ -38.7 dBm sensitivity @ 1 Gbps
� The architecture proposed is fully integrable
� Homodyne reception is a feasible way to enable UD-WDM PONs in a near future.
G C OG C OG C OG C OU
PC
UPC
UPC
UPC
-- --G
CO
GC
OG
CO
GC
O
Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya (UPC)Dept. of Signal Theory and Communications (TSC)
Optical Communications Group (GCO)www.tsc.upc.edu/gco
Univ
ers
itat
Politè
cnic
ade C
ata
lunya
ThanksThanks!!!!
Josep MJosep MJosep MJosep Mªªªª FFFFàààà[email protected]