low cost surfacing approaches in zimbabwe
DESCRIPTION
LOW COST SURFACING APPROACHES IN ZIMBABWE. CASE STUDY: Marondera - Musami Road Construction Project K. Mukura TRL Ltd. Introduction. Constructed in 1993-1994 period Before construction: 22 km was narrow mat 41 km was gravel road in poor condition After construction: 22 km is narrow mat - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
LOW COST SURFACING LOW COST SURFACING APPROACHES IN ZIMBABWEAPPROACHES IN ZIMBABWE
CASE STUDY: Marondera - Musami Road CASE STUDY: Marondera - Musami Road Construction ProjectConstruction Project
K. MukuraK. Mukura
TRL LtdTRL Ltd
IntroductionIntroduction
Constructed in 1993-1994 periodConstructed in 1993-1994 period Before construction:Before construction:
22 km was narrow mat22 km was narrow mat 41 km was gravel road in poor 41 km was gravel road in poor
conditioncondition After construction:After construction:
22 km is narrow mat22 km is narrow mat 41 km is surfaced to a 7/8 standard41 km is surfaced to a 7/8 standard Low cost surfacing method was usedLow cost surfacing method was used
IntroductionIntroduction
Location: Location:
HARARE
CITY
Marondera-Musami Road
Marondera Town
Cross
To Mozambique
Malawi
MUTARE CITY
To Mozambique
Beira Port
63km
73km
60km
Construction StandardsConstruction Standards
Alignment:Alignment: closely followed the existing gravel closely followed the existing gravel
roadroad cuts and fills were designed by eyecuts and fills were designed by eye curvature was designed by eye curvature was designed by eye
except in complicated situationsexcept in complicated situations very sharp curves were acceptable very sharp curves were acceptable
to minimise coststo minimise costs Super-elevation was difficult to set Super-elevation was difficult to set
by eye by eye
Construction StandardsConstruction Standards
Pavement Design:Pavement Design: x-section: 7/8, 3% camber, 2m wide drains x-section: 7/8, 3% camber, 2m wide drains
( detour)( detour) 150mm sub-grade and base 1 thickness150mm sub-grade and base 1 thickness Compaction:Compaction:
Ls 91% HCE for sub-gradeLs 91% HCE for sub-grade Ls 93% HCE for base 1Ls 93% HCE for base 1
Materials specification:Materials specification: base 1: triaxial class 2.8, laterite & base 1: triaxial class 2.8, laterite &
decomposed granite sometimes marginaldecomposed granite sometimes marginal sub-grade: SG9sub-grade: SG9
Construction StandardsConstruction Standards
Pavement Design:Pavement Design: Surfacing: single sealSurfacing: single seal
10mm crushed stone @ 10x1010mm crushed stone @ 10x10-3-3m3/m2m3/m2 TP7 prime @ 0.9 litres/m2TP7 prime @ 0.9 litres/m2 bitumen 150/200 @ 1.2 litres/m2bitumen 150/200 @ 1.2 litres/m2
ObservationsObservations
Traffic:Traffic: traffic increased beyond design capacity of traffic increased beyond design capacity of
roadroad heavy to opted for the short cut bypassing heavy to opted for the short cut bypassing
Harare despite 22km of narrow matHarare despite 22km of narrow mat Pavement: Pavement:
still sound to date in spite of marginal still sound to date in spite of marginal materials used.materials used.
re-sealing was done after 5 years and the re-sealing was done after 5 years and the carriageway looks goodcarriageway looks good
Conclusion Conclusion
Most sealed rural roads in Zimbabwe have Most sealed rural roads in Zimbabwe have been over-designedbeen over-designed
Low-cost surfacing technique is used Low-cost surfacing technique is used widely now to upgrade rural roadswidely now to upgrade rural roads
Drainage system should be good enough Drainage system should be good enough to prevent water seeping into pavement to prevent water seeping into pavement