love does not come by demanding from others, but it is a self initiation
DESCRIPTION
Love does not come by demanding from others, but it is a self initiation. BRAND. 1234 17.9, 18.1 17.8, 17.8 18.1, 18.2 17.8, 17.9 18.0, 18.2 18.0, 18.3 18.4, 18.1 18.1, 18.5 18.0, 17.8 17.8, 18.0 18.1, 18.3 18.1, 17.9. 1 2 3. DEVICE. Two Factor Designs. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
1
Love does not come by demanding from others, but it is a self initiation.
2
Two Factor DesignsConsider studying the impact of two factors on the yield (response):
Here we have R = 3 rows (levels of the Row factor), C = 4 (levels of the column factor), and n = 2 replicates per cell
[nij for (i,j)th cell if not all equal]
NOTE: The “1”, “2”,etc...mean Level 1, Level 2,etc..., NOT metric values
1 2 3 417.9, 18.1 17.8, 17.8 18.1, 18.2 17.8, 17.9
18.0, 18.2 18.0, 18.3 18.4, 18.1 18.1, 18.5
18.0, 17.8 17.8, 18.0 18.1, 18.3 18.1, 17.9
BRAND
123
DEVICE
3
MODEL:
i = 1, ..., Rj = 1, ..., Ck= 1, ..., n
In general, n observations per cell, R • C cells.
Yijk = ijijijk
4
the grand meanithe difference between the ith
row mean and the grand meanj the difference between the jth
column mean and the grand meanij the interaction associated with
the i-th row and the j-th columnijij
5
Where Y••• = Grand mean
Yi•• = Mean of row iY•j• = Mean of column jYij• = Mean of cell (i,j)
[All the terms are somewhat “intuitive”, except for (Yij• -Yi•• - Y•j• + Y•••)]
Yijk = Y•••+ (Yi•• - Y•••) + (Y•j• - Y•••)+ (Yij• - Yi•• - Y•j• + Y•••)+ (Yijk - Yij•)
6
The term (Yij• -Yi•• - Y•j• + Y•••) is more intuitively written as:
how a cellmean differs
from grand mean
adjustmentfor “row
membership”
adjustmentfor “column
membership”
We can, without loss of generality, assume (for a moment) that there is no error (random part); why then might the above be non-zero?
(Yij• - Y•••) (Yi•• - Y•••) (Y•j• - Y•••)
7
ANSWER:
Two basic ways to look at interaction:
BL BH
AL 5 8AH 10 ?
If AHBH = 13, no interactionIf AHBH > 13, + interactionIf AHBH < 13, - interaction
- When B goes from BLBH, yield goes up by 3 (58).- When A goes from AL AH, yield goes up by 5 (510).- When both changes of level occur, does yield go up by the sum, 3 + 5 = 8?
Interaction = degree of difference from sum of separate effects
1)
“INTERACTION”
8
2)
- Holding BL, what happens as A goes from AL AH? +5
- Holding BH, what happens as A goes from AL AH? +9If the effect of one factor (i.e., the impact of changing its level) is DIFFERENT for different levels of another factor, then INTERACTION exists between the two factors.
BL BH
AL 5 8AH 10 17
NOTE:- Holding AL, BL BH has impact + 3- Holding AH, BL BH has impact + 7
(AB) = (BA) or (9-5) = (7-3).
9
(Yijk - Y•••) = (Yi•• - Y•••) + (Y•j• - Y•••)
+ [(Yij• - Yi••) - (Y•j• - Y•••)]
+ (Yijk - Yij•)
Going back to the (model) equation on page 4, and bringing Y... to the other side of the equation, we get
If we then square both sides, triple sum both sides over i, j, and k, we get, (after noting that all cross-product terms cancel):
Effect of column j at row i. Effect of column j
10
TSS = SSBRows + SSBCols + SSIR,C+ SSWError
and, in terms of degrees of freedom,
R.C.n-1 = (R-1) + (C-1) + (R-1)(C-1) + R.C.(n-1); DF of Interaction = (RC-1)-(R-1)-(C-1) = (R-1)(C-1).
OR,
(Yijk - Y•••)n.C.Yi•• - Y•••
i j k i
+ n.R.Y•j• - Y•••)2
+ n.Yij• - Yi•• - Y•j• +Y•••
i j
(Yijk - Yij•
i j k
j
11
17.9, 18.1 17.8, 17.8 18.1, 18.2 17.8,17.9
18.1 17.8 18.15 17.85
18.2, 18.0 18.0, 18.3 18.4, 18.1 18.1, 18.5
18.1 18.15 18.25 18.3
18.0, 17.8 17.8, 18.0 18.1, 18.3 18.1, 17.9
17.9 17.9 18.2 18.0
1 2 3 4
18.00 17.95 18.20 18.05
1
2
3
In our example:
DEV ICE
17.95
18.20
18.00
18.05
BRAND
12
SSBrows =2 4[(17.95-18.05) 2 + (18.20-18.05) 2 + (18.0-18.05) 2]
= 8 (.01 + .0225 + .0025) = .28
SSBcol =2•3[(18-18.05) 2+(17.95-18.05) 2+(18.2-18.05) 2+( 18.05-18.05) 2]
= 6 (.0025 + .001 + .0225 + 0) = .21
SSIR,C = 2(18-17.95-18+18.05)2 + (17.8-17.95-17.95+18.05)2 ....… + (18-18-18.05+18.05)2
[]
= 2 [.055] = .11
SSW = (17.9-18.0) 2 + (18.1-18.0) 2 + (17.8-17.8) 2 + (17.8-17.8) 2 + …....... (18.1-18.0) 2 + (17.9-18.0) 2
= .30
TSS = .28 + .21+ .11 + .30 = .90
•
•
13
FTV (2, 12) = 3.89 Reject Ho
FTV (3, 12) = 3.49 Accept Ho
FTV (6, 12) = 3.00 Accept Ho
1) Ho: All Row Means EqualH1: Not all Row Means Equal
2) Ho: All Col. Means EqualH1: Not All Col. Means Equal
3) Ho: No Int’n between factorsH1: There is int’n between factors
ANOVA
.05
SOURCE SSQ df M.S. FcalcRows .28 2 .14 5.6COL .21 3 .07 2.8Int’n .11 6 .0183 .73Error .30 12 .025
14
15
Minitab: Stat >> Anova >> General Linear Model
General Linear Model: time versus brand, device
Factor Type Levels Valuesbrand fixed 4 1, 2, 3, 4device fixed 3 1, 2, 3
Analysis of Variance for time, using Adjusted SS for Tests
Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F Pbrand 3 0.21000 0.21000 0.07000 2.80 0.085device 2 0.28000 0.28000 0.14000 5.60 0.019brand*device 6 0.11000 0.11000 0.01833 0.73 0.633Error 12 0.30000 0.30000 0.02500Total 23 0.90000
S = 0.158114 R-Sq = 66.67% R-Sq(adj) = 36.11%
16
Assumption:
ijk follows N(0, 2) for all i, j, k, and they are independent.
17
18
Test for Normality
1. Restore residuals when doing Anova.2. Stat >> Basic Statistics >> Normality Test
Mean -4.44089E-16StDev 0.1142N 24AD 0.815P-Value 0.030
Not really normal but not too far from normal.
19
Test for Equal Variances
Minitab: Stat >> Anova >> Test for Equal Variances
Test for Equal Variances: time versus device, brand
95% Bonferroni confidence intervals for standard deviations
device brand N Lower StDev Upper 1 1 2 0.0463363 0.141421 49.6486 1 2 2 * 0.000000 * … 3 4 2 0.0463363 0.141421 49.6486
Bartlett's Test (normal distribution)Test statistic = 2.33, p-value = 0.993
* NOTE * Levene's test cannot be computed for these data.
Fixed Effect Model
20
Random Effect ModelAdditional assumptions:i follows N(0, 2
) for all i, and they are independent.j follows N(0, 2
) for all j, and they are independent.ij follows N(0, 2
) for all I, j, and they are independent.•All these random components i j , ij ijk are (mutually) independent.
21
Mixed Effect Model (fixed rows and random columns)
22
23
Fixed Random Mixed MSRows
cnn
cn
ncn
MSColRnnRnn
Rn
MSRC
nnn
MSError
Another issue:Table 17.17 (O/L 6th ed., p. 1057)
MEANSQUARE EXPECTATIONS
col = randomrow= fixed
Reference: Design and Analysis of Experiments by D.C. Montgomery, 4th edition, Chapter 11.
24
Fixed: Specific levels chosen by the experimenterRandom: Levels chosen randomly from a large
number of possibilities
Fixed: All Levels about which inferences are to be made are included in the experiment
Random: Levels are some of a large number possible
Fixed: A definite number of qualitatively distinguishable levels, and we plan to study them all, or a continuous set of quantitative settings, but we choose a suitable, definite subset in a limited region and confine inferences to that subset
Random: Levels are a random sample from an infinite ( or large) population
25
“In a great number of cases the investigator may argue either way, depending on his mood and his handling of the subject matter. In other words, it is more a matter of assumption than of reality.”
Some authors say that if in doubt, assume fixed model. Others say things like “I think in most experimental situations the random model is applicable.” [The latter quote is from a person whose experiments are in the field of biology].
26
My own feeling is that in most areas of management, a majority of experiments involve the fixed model [e.g., specific promotional campaigns, two specific ways of handling an issue on an income statement, etc.] . Many cases involve neither a “pure” fixed nor a “pure” random situation [e.g., selecting 3 prices from 6 “practical” possibilities].
Note that the issue sometimes becomes irrelevant in a practical sense when (certain) interactions are not present. Also note that each assumption may yield you the same “answer” in terms of practical application, in which case the distinction may not be an important one.
How to Fit these Models in Minitab
27
• “Balanced ANOVA” can fit restricted and unrestricted version. By default, it shows unrestricted model.
• “General Linear Model” can only fit unrestricted model.
• There are no difference between restricted or unrestricted versions for fixed effect and random effect model. It only matters for the mixed effect model.
More on Minitab
28
• The notation in EMS output under restricted model matches with ours but it under unrestricted model is different to ours.
• General suggestion: use “General Linear Model” to fit the models BUT use “Balanced ANOVA, option of restricted model” to find the EMS for fixed and random effect models.
29
Two-Way ANOVA in Minitab
Stat>>Anova>>General Linear Model:
Model device brand device*brand
Random factors
Results
Factor plots
Graphs
device
Tick “Display expected mean squares and variance components”
Main effects plots & Interactions plots
Use standardized residuals for plots
30
General Linear Model: time versus device, brand
Factor Type Levels Values device random 3 1 2 3brand fixed 4 1 2 3 4
Analysis of Variance for time, using Adjusted SS for Tests
Source DF Seq SS Adj SS Adj MS F Pdevice 2 0.28000 0.28000 0.14000 7.64 0.022brand 3 0.21000 0.21000 0.07000 3.82 0.076device*brand 6 0.11000 0.11000 0.01833 0.73 0.633Error 12 0.30000 0.30000 0.02500Total 23 0.90000
31
Exercise: Lifetime of a Special-purpose Battery
It is important in battery testing to consider different temperatures and modes of use; a battery that is superior at one temperature and mode of use is not necessarily superior at other treatment combination. The batteries were being tested at 4 different temperatures for three modes of use (I for intermittent, C for continuous, S for sporadic). Analyze the data.
32
Battery Lifetime (2 replicates)
Mode of use 1 2 3 4
I 12, 16 15, 19 31, 39 53, 55
C 15, 19 17, 17 30, 34 51, 49
S 11, 17 24, 22 33, 37 61, 67
Temperature
33
M FInteresting Example:*
Frontiersman
April
50 peopleper cell
Mean Scores “Frontiersman” “April” “Frontiersman” “April”Dependent males males females femalesVariables (n=50) (n=50) (n=50) (n=50)
Intent-to-purchase 4.44 3.50 2.04 4.52
(*) Decision Sciences”, Vol. 9, p. 470, 1978
Brand Name Appeal for Men & Women:
34
1 2
1 2
2
3
4
gender
brandM
ean
Interaction Plot - Data Means for y
12Y
35
ANOVA Results
Dependent Source d.f. MS FVariable
Intent-to- Sex (A) 1 23.80 5.61* purchase Brand name (B) 1 29.64 6.99**(7 pt. scale) A x B 1 146.21 34.48***
Error 196 4.24
*p<.05**p<.01
***p<.001
36
Two Factors with No Replication,
When there’s no replication, there is no “pure” way to estimate ERROR.Error is measured by considering more than one observation (i.e., replication) at the same “treatment combination” (i.e., experimental conditions).
1 2 31 7 3 42 10 6 83 6 2 54 9 5 7
A
B
37
Our model for analysis is “technically”:
Yij = i j + Iij
i = 1, ..., R
j = 1, ..., C
We can write:
Yij = Y•• + (Yi• - Y••) + (Y•j - Y••)
+ (Yij - Yi• - Y•j+ Y••)
38
After bringing Y•• to the other side of the equation, squaring both sides, and double summing over i and j,
We Find:Yij - Y••)2 = C • Yi•-Y••)2
+ R • Y•j - Y••)2
+ (Yij - Yi• - Y•j +
Y••)2
R
i = 1
C
j=1
R
i=1
C
j=1
R
i=1
C
j=1
39
TSS = SSBROWS + SSBCol + SSIR, C
R•C - 1 = (R - 1) + (C - 1) + (R - 1) (C - 1)Degrees of Freedom :
We Know, E(MSInt.) = VInt.
If we assume VInt. = 0, E(MSInt.) = 2,
and we can call SSIR,C SSW
MSInt MSW
40
And, our model may be rewritten:
Yij = + i + j + ij,
and the “labels” would become:
TSS = SSBROWS+ SSBCol + SSWError
In our problem: SSBrows = 28.67
SSBcol = 32
SSW = 1.33
41
Source SSQ df MSQ Fcalc
rows
col
Error
28.67
32.00
1.33
9.55
16.00
00.22
3
2
6
43
72
TSS = 62 11
at = .01,
FTV (3,6)
= 9.78
FTV(2,6)
= 10.93
ANOVAand:
42
What if we’re wrong about there being no interaction?
If we “think” our ratio is,
in Expectation, 2 + VROWS , (Say, for ROWS) 2
and it really is (because there’s interaction)
2 + VROWS,2 + Vint’n
being wrong can lead only to giving us an underestimated Fcalc.
43
Thus, if we’ve REJECTED Ho, we can feel confident of our conclusion, even if there’s
interaction
If we’ve ACCEPTED Ho, only then could the no interaction assumption be CRITICAL.