louisiana board of regents representative austin badon a concurrent resolution to urge and request...
TRANSCRIPT
RESPONSE TO HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 165OF THE 2010 REGULAR SESSION OF THE LOUISIANA
LEGISLATURE
LOUISIANA BOARD OF REGENTS
JANUARY, 2011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Introduction and Background I
A Perspective on Graduation Rates and Completers 1
Summary, Conclusions and Recommendations 7
Appendices
Appendix AAppendix BAppendix CAppendix D
2
Introduction and Background
House Concurrent Resolution No. 165 of the 2010 Regular Session of the Louisiana
Legislature urges and requests the Board of Regents to:
“...study and make recommendations relative to including students whograduate from an institution in calculations for determining and forreporting on student graduation and completion rates by publicpostsecondary Institutions.”
A copy of 11CR 165 appears as Appendix A to this report.
A Perspective on Graduation Rates and Completers
Over the past 30 years, the Board of Regents has developed a number of student level
data systems in which all public postsecondary institutions participate. Using the data reported
in Regents’ Statewide Completer System and Statewide Student Profile System, Regents has
developed and refined reports on completers and graduation rates. The following reports are
annually published on Regents’ website:
Completers
Each institution reports annually student level data for students who have been awarded a
degree or certificate, within the most recent academic year (summer, fall and spring), in a
program of study recognized by the Board of Regents. The numbers of awards are reflected in
the published reports regardless of when the students began the program, the institution in which
they initially enrolled, whether or not they were fuiltime or part-time, whether or not they were
entering freshmen or transfer students, or how long it took them to complete the program. The
only criterion is that they received an award in the most recent academic year. If a student
received more than one award in an academic year, both awards are reported. Several reports are
published, all of which identify the number of awards by institution and statewide, and by other
variables, such as degree level, program of study, gender, and race. In 2009-10, 34,901
3
degrees/certi±icates were awarded statewide by Louisiana’s public postsecondary education
institutions. A sample of a most recent completer report appears as Appendix B to this report.
Graduation Rates
Upon receipt of fmal completer data, the Board of Regents annually produces a
Graduation Rate Report. The Regents’ systemic graduation rate report is designed to track a
first-time, full-time cohort of students (reported in the Statewide Student Profile System) through
the first six years of Louisiana public postsecondary education.
Institutions participating in federal financial aid programs are required to report these
data to the U.S. Department of Education. In calculating the graduation rates, Regents uses the
U.S. Department of Education’s Integrated Postsecondary Education Data System (WEDS)
defmition of the cohort to be tracked:
“...the percentage of first-time, full-time degree/certificate seeking undergraduatestudents who enter the institution as part of the fall cohort of a specific year andcomplete their program within 150% of time to degree (6 years for bachelor degree and 3years for associate degree)”
This is also known at the same institution graduation rate. It is an accurate measure of
what it is intended to measure and what is required of the institutions by the U.S. Department of
Education. Regents chose to use the WEDS definition because it is consistent and can be
compared to other rates, whether by institution, within the state, regionally or nationally, and
over a long period of time. For example, the rates published by the Southern Regional Education
Board (SREB) and used to compare to Louisiana institutions, are same institution graduation
rates using the WEDS defmition.
For each cohort, the Board of Regents calculates three separate graduation rates: (a)
associate or below in 150% of normal time for students awarded an associate degree, diploma, or
4
certificate within 3 years; (b) baccalaureate in 150% of normal time for students awarded a
baccalaureate degree within 6 years; and (c) first award from (a) or (b) in 150% of time.
Since its inception, the IPEDs Graduation Rate Survey has come under heavy criticism
from a variety of sources. The majority of the criticism has targeted the narrow focus of the
survey and the many students who are excluded in the calculation: part-time, non-degree
seeking, transfers, etc. Despite the U.S. Department of Education’s reporting requirements
regarding graduation rates, there are other graduation and related rates which can be reported j
addition to the WEDS rates. Granted, these additional calculations may not allow for regional
and national comparisons. However, they do allow the opportunity to examine graduation rates
in a different light and provide a more complete picture of Louisiana’s graduates. A description
of some of these methodologies follows.
Because of its robust student level data systems, Regents is able to calculate same
institution and statewide graduation rates, including graduates from either the same or any other
public postsecondary institution in Louisiana. If a cohort student enters and completes at the
same institution, that student is counted in the WEDs and Regents’ same institution rate. If the
cohort student enters and completes at the same or a different public postsecondary institution,
that student is counted in Regent’s statewide graduation rate. Although campus leaders have
every interest in a student graduating from the ‘home’ institution, the state’s interests are served
by the student earning the award, regardless of which Louisiana public institution confers it.
For example — for the 2003 cohort that completed within 150% of time:3,000 cohort students began at University A1,000 students completed their degree at University A, for a same institution graduation
rate of 33.33%1,200 students completed their degree at University A or at another public postsecondaryinstitution in Louisiana, for a statewide graduation rate of 40.00%
5
The statewide graduation rate for the state for the fall 2003 cohort is 36.81%. A total of
29,693 students were in the entering cohort in 2003 and the number of first awards received by
the students within 150% of time (through the 2009-10 academic year) was 10,931. The same
institution graduation rate for the 2003 cohort was 3 1.26% based on 9,282 graduates, not
including the 1,649 students who graduated from an institution other than the one at which they
originally enrolled. The most recent graduation rate report appears as Appendix C to this report.
While these two reports, Completers and Graduation Rate, provide accurate infonnation
on total completers (regardless of when or where the student was first enrolled) and traditional
graduation rates (tracking a cohort of students defined by the U.S. Department of Education) for
the purposes for which they were intended, there are other measures of annual undergraduate
award production. These other measures include students in the traditional cohort as well as
non-traditional students, part-time students, transfer students, and students who complete beyond
150% of time for the degree. These measures compare either the number of awards or the
number of students receiving awards to the annual undergraduate fulltime equivalent (FTE)
enrollment. FTE is calculated from Regents’ Student Credit Hour Reporting System.
Award/Completion Ratio
The award ratio compares the number of awards received at an institution in an academic
year to the annual undergraduate FTE at the same institution. All awards are counted, regardless
if a student receives more than one award during the academic year. The completion ratio
compares the number of students (completers) receiving an award(s) at an institution in an
academic year to the annual undergraduate Fit at the same institution. Completers are counted
once, even if they received more than one award.
6
These measures normalize the comparison of the ratios to other institutions and
statewide, regardless of the size of the institution’s undergraduate FTE.
For example, for the 2009-10 academic year:University B’s undergraduate FTE is 12,0002,000 undergraduate awards were conferred at University BAward ratio = 2,000/12,000 = .1661,900 students completed at least one degree at University BGraduation ratio = 1,900/12,000 = .158
College A’s undergraduate Fl’E is 2,000400 undergraduate awards were conferred at College AAward ratio = 400/2,000 = .200450 students completed at least one degree at College AGraduation ratio = 450/2,000 = .225
Beginning in 2011, it is the intention of Regents to design and publish on its website an
annual Award/Graduation Ratio Report. Although regional and national comparisons may be
unavailable currently, many states are considering the adoption and publication of these metrics.
These ratios allow campuses to account for graduates in its reports without the restrictions
inherent in the federal WEDS reports. A sample of an Award/Graduation Ratio Report appears
in Attachment D to this report.
Summary. Conclusions and Recommendations
Summary and Conclusions
House Concurrent Resolution No. 165 of the 2010 Regular Session of the Louisiana
Legislature urges and requests the Board of Regents to:
“...study and make recommendations relative to including students whograduate from an institution in calculations for determining and forreporting on student graduation and completion rates by publicpostsecondary institutions.”
The Board of Regents currently publishes annual reports for the following:
7
• Completers — the numbers of awards completed in an academic year by
institution, regardless of when the students began the program, the institution in
which they initially enrolled, whether or not they were fuiltime or part-time,
whether or not they were entering freshmen or transfer students, or how long it
took them to complete the program.
• Graduation rates -- to track a first-time, full-time cohort of students (defined by
the U.S. Department of Education) through the first six years of Louisiana public
postsecondary education. Regents publishes an annual report on same institution
graduation rate and statewide graduation rate by institution.
Recommendation
The Board of Regents recommends that, in addition to continuing to publish the reports
cited above, it commits to design and add to its published reports an Award/Completion Ratio
report — to compare the number of awards received at an institution in an academic year and the
number of completers receiving an award to the annual undergraduate FTE at the same
institution.
8
ENROLLED
Regular Session, 2010
HOUSE CONCURRENT RESOLUTION NO. 165
BY REPRESENTATIVE AUSTIN BADON
A CONCURRENT RESOLUTION
To urge and request the Board of Regents, in consultation with the public postsecondary
education management boards, to study and make recommendations relative to
including students who graduate from an institution in calculations for determining
and for reporting on student graduation and completion rates by public
postsecondary education institutions; to provide for a report to the legislative
education committees of study findings and recommendations; and to provide for
related matters.
WHEREAS, earning a college credential enhances an individual’s opportunity for
employment and advancement; and
WHEREAS, college graduates have increased earning power and have been shown
to contribute greatly to the good of society; and
WHEREAS, the United States Department of Education (USDOE) recognizes the
value of a college credential and collects such information on an annual basis; and
WHEREAS, in addition to collecting data on graduates, USDOE collects information
on graduation rates; and
WHEREAS, the USDOE graduation rate calculation is based on tracking an entering
cohort of first-time, full-time degree-seeking freshmen who graduate from that institution;
and
WHEREAS, transfer students are not counted in the USDOE graduation rate for
either the sending or receiving institution; and
WHEREAS, entering part-time students are not counted in the USDOE graduation
rate; and
Page I of 2
HCR NO. 165 ENROLLED
WHEREAS, all completers in postsecondary education are important contributors
to Louisiana’s economy and society, whether or not they meet specific criteria for inclusion
in a federally defined rate; and
WHEREAS, public postsecondary education institutions should be recognized and
given credit for graduating students, regardless of where the student begins postsecondary
education; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Regents’ data systems provide the agency with the
capability to report graduation and completion rates in ways that present a more complete
picture of the results achieved by public postsecondary education institutions.
THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Legislature of Louisiana does hereby
urge and request the Board of Regents, in consultation with the public postsecondary
education management boards, to study and make recommendations relative to including
students who graduate from an institution in calculations for determining and for reporting
on student graduation and completion rates by public postsecondary education institutions.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Board of Regents shall report in writing on
study findings and recommendations to the House Committee on Education and to the
Senate Committee on Education by not later than March 1, 2011.
SPEAKER OF THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
PRESIDENT OF THE SENATE
Page 2 of 2
LO
UIS
IAN
A-
BO
AR
DO
FR
EG
EN
TS
INF
OR
MA
TIO
NS
ER
VIC
ES
DIV
ISIO
NP
RO
GR
AM
-ID
.C
MPL
RC
MP
ST
AT
EW
ID
EC
OM
PL
ET
ER
SS
YS
TE
MD
EG
RE
ES
/CE
RT
IFIC
AT
ES
AW
AR
DE
DB
YR
AC
EF
OR
AC
AD
EM
ICY
EA
R2009-2
010
TO
TA
LS
TU
DE
NT
S
PA
GE
7R
UN
-DA
TE
RU
N-T
IME
10/2
8/2
010
15:3
1:4
2P
OS
T-
PO
ST
-P
OS
T-
PO
ST
-P
OS
T-
INS
TIT
UT
ION
NA
ME
DIP
LO
MA
CE
RT
.A
SS
OC
.A
SS
OC
.B
AC
H.
BA
CH
.M
AS
T.
MA
ST
.D
OC
T.
DO
CT
.S
PE
C.
PR
OF
.P
RO
F.
TO
TA
L
SO
UT
HE
RN
U.
AT
BA
TO
NR
OU
GH
SO
UT
HE
RN
U.
AT
NEW
OR
LE
AN
SS
OU
TH
ER
NU
.A
TS
HR
EV
EP
OR
TS
OU
TH
ER
NLA
WC
EN
TE
RS
OU
TH
ER
NU
.S
YS
TE
MT
OT
AL
S
BA
TO
NR
OU
GE
CO
MM
UN
ITY
CO
LL
EG
BO
SS
IER
PA
RIS
HC
OM
MU
NIT
YC
CL
DE
LG
AD
OC
OM
MU
NIT
YC
OL
LE
GE
EL
AIN
EP
.N
UN
EZ
CO
MM
UN
.C
OL
LR
IVE
RP
AR
ISH
ES
CO
MM
UN
ITY
CO
LSO
UT
HL
A.
CO
MM
UN
ITY
CO
LL
EG
EL
A.
DE
LT
AC
OM
MU
NIT
YC
OL
LE
GE
L.T
.C.
-AC
AD
IAN
L.T
.C.-
AL
EX
AN
DR
IAL
.T.
C.
-AS
CE
NS
ION
L.T
.C.
-AV
OY
EL
LE
SL
.T.C
.-B
AS
TR
OP
L.T
.C.-
BA
TO
NR
OU
GE
L.T
.C.-
CH
AR
LE
SB
.C
OR
EIL
L.T
.C
.-D
EL
TA
OU
AC
HIT
AL
.T.C
-EV
AN
GE
LIN
EL
.T.
C.
-FL
OR
IDA
PA
RIS
HE
SL
.T
.C
.-F
OL
KE
SL
.T.C
.-G
UL
FA
RE
AL
.T.C
.-H
AM
MO
ND
AR
EA
L.T
.C.-
HU
EY
P.
LO
NG
L.T
.C
.-
JEF
FE
RS
ON
L.T
.C.
-JU
MO
NV
ILL
EL
.E
.F
LE
TC
HE
RL
.T.C
.-L
AF
AY
ET
TE
L.T
.C.-
LA
FO
UR
CH
EL
.T.C
.-L
AM
AR
SA
LT
ER
L.T
.C
.-M
AN
SF
IEL
DL
.T.C
.-M
OR
GA
NS
MIT
H
00
00
01
40
75
215
00
00
75229
0870
0228
o0
00
01,0
98
0283
0132
00
00
0415
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
01,1
73
0374
0290
0134
01,9
71
495
760
1,3
21
252
224
409 99
90
109
120
150
65
249
94
269
37
59
327
155
177
107 54
61
242
364 86
72 58
46
GR
AI4
BL
ING
ST
AT
EU
NIV
ER
SIT
YL
OU
ISIA
NA
TE
CH
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
MC
NE
ES
ES
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
NIC
HO
LL
SS
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
OF
LA
.A
TM
ON
RO
EN
OR
TH
WE
ST
ER
NS
TA
TE
UN
IVE
RS
ITS
OU
TH
EA
ST
ER
NL
A.
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
OF
LA
.A
TL
AF
AY
ET
U.
OF
LA
.S
YS
TE
MT
OT
AL
S
LS
.U.
AT
AL
EX
A3]
DR
IAL
.S.U
.A
TB
AT
ON
RO
UG
EL
.S.U
.A
TE
UN
ICE
L.S
.U.
AT
SH
RE
VE
PO
RT
LS
UH
EA
LT
HS
CIE
NC
ES
CE
NT
ER
-NL
SU
HE
AL
TH
SC
IEN
CE
SC
TR
-SH
RE
UN
IVE
RS
ITY
OF
NEW
OR
LE
AN
SL
.S.U
.LA
WC
EN
TE
RL
.S.U
.S
YS
TE
MT
OT
AL
S
00
35
00
79
00
152
00
153
00
72
00
271
00
660
00
00
828
012
116
00
02
12
257
00
00
05
00
00
00
00
02
24
378
0713
01,2
75
0975
0938
01,0
32
01,0
98
01,9
64
02,1
38
010,1
33
0137
04,3
88
60
0502
0286
048
01,3
47
00
66,7
08
0133
25
413
0275
0144
0240
0224
0337
0392
25
2,1
58
00
01,0
43
00
09
00
189
02
00
600
00
01,9
42
04
00
00
885
03
60
00
01,8
28
00
03
00
1,4
05
00
05
00
1,2
40
025
03
69
01,4
41
00
015
00
1,6
08
02
00
00
2,3
69
139
00
00
2,5
70
1106
026
69
013,3
46
00
0300
00
00
06
20
57
06
00
00
479
00
00
18
81
00
00
80
00
225
00
109
00
00
0182
026
597
0265
05,8
30
0277
0600
12
779
0234
02,0
07
11
193
23
10,1
85
020
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
00
0134
02
00
0134
0155
340
00
00
00
00
24
254
469
130
00
00
00
51
250
1,0
20
00
00
00
00
42
80
130
00
00
00
00
0146
78
00
00
00
00
0239
170
00
00
00
00
00
99
00
00
00
00
44
46
00
00
00
00
06
63
013
00
00
00
00
44
38
38
00
00
00
00
99
61
00
00
00
00
050
15
00
00
00
00
0117
109
23
00
00
00
00
50
44
00
00
00
00
0119
133
17
00
00
00
00
17
20
00
00
00
00
044
15
00
00
00
00
0210
117
00
00
00
00
072
81
20
00
00
00
06
5107
50
00
00
00
072
35
00
00
00
00
020
44
00
00
00
00
01
94
20
00
00
00
00
55
134
530
00
00
00
0127
181
56
00
00
00
00
39
33
14
00
00
00
00
36
36
00
00
00
00
04
711
00
00
00
00
03
412
00
00
00
00
0
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
LO
UIS
IAN
A-
BO
AR
DO
FR
EG
EN
TS
INF
OR
MA
TIO
NS
ER
VIC
ES
DIV
ISIO
NP
RO
GR
AM
-ID
.C
MPL
RC
MP
ST
AT
EW
ID
EC
OM
PL
ET
ER
SS
YS
TE
MD
EG
RE
ES
/CE
RT
IFIC
AT
ES
AW
AR
DE
DB
YR
AC
EF
OR
AC
AD
EM
ICY
EA
R2009-2
010
TO
TA
LS
TU
DE
NT
S
PA
GE
8R
UN
-DA
TE
RU
N-T
IME
10/2
8/2
010
15:3
1:4
2P
OS
T-
PO
ST
-P
OS
T-
PO
ST
-P
OS
TIN
ST
ITU
TIO
NN
AM
ED
IPL
OM
AC
ER
T.
AS
SO
C.
AS
SO
C.
BA
CH
.B
AC
H.
MA
ST
.M
AS
T.
DO
CT
.D
OC
T.
SP
EC
.P
RO
F.
PR
OF
.T
OT
AL
36 13
37
17
3 60
48 37 7
17
55
19
37
17
9127
110
146
22 68
31
30
14
146
56 60 2 5 5
138 39
25
58
234 68 85
43
130
6 0 922
11
931 7 0
19 0 0
10
267 6 8 3 5
PU
BL
ICT
OT
AL
S2,7
57
3,7
36
4,4
29
19
17,9
39
25
4,5
15
1605
052
800
23
34,9
01
L.T
.C.
-NA
TC
HIT
OC
HE
SL
.T.C
.-N
OR
TH
CE
NT
RA
LL
.T.
C.
-NO
RT
HE
AS
TL
.T.C
.-N
OR
TH
WE
ST
L.T
.C.
-OA
KD
AL
EL
.T.O
.-.
RIV
ER
PA
RIS
HE
SL
.T.C
.-R
US
TO
NL
.T.C
.-W
ES
TJE
FF
ER
SO
NL
.T
.C
.-W
ES
TS
IDE
L.T
.C.
-YO
UN
GM
EM
OR
IAL
L.T
.C.-
SA
BIN
EV
AL
LE
YL
.T.C
.-S
HE
LB
YJA
CK
SO
NL
.T
.C
.-S
HR
EV
EP
OR
TB
OS
SIE
RSO
WE
LA
L.T
.C.
-SU
LL
IVA
NL
.T.C
.-T
.H.
HA
RR
ISL
.T.C
.-T
AL
LU
LA
.H/M
.S
UR
LE
SL
.T.C
.-T
EC
HE
AR
EA
L.C
.T.C
.S.
SY
ST
EM
TO
TA
LS
00
00
00
00
00
73
00
00
00
00
00
43
00
00
00
00
00
60
00
00
00
00
00
34
10
00
00
00
00
0127
00
00
00
00
00
20
10
00
00
00
00
04
00
00
00
00
00
01
90
00
00
00
00
022
00
00
00
00
00
213
00
00
00
00
00
58
00
00
00
00
00
620
00
00
00
00
0247
00
00
00
00
00
628
00
00
00
00
00
18
40
00
00
00
00
0239
00
00
00
00
00
68
00
00
00
00
00
203
13
00
00
00
00
09,3
99
2,7
55
3,6
37
2,9
94
Report
:IP
ED
SB
RG
RA
TE
RP
TL
ouis
iana
Bo
ard
of
Reg
en
tsB
oard
of
Regents
Gra
duati
on
Rate
Pag
e1
9/0
3/1
016:2
7:0
8
Insti
tuti
on
GS
UL
aT
ech
McN
eese
Nic
holl
sU
LM
NS
US
LU
UL
LL
SU
AL
SU
A&
ML
SU
STJ
NO
SU
A&
MSU
NO
2003
Associa
teor
Belo
w150*
Tim
eF
TF
---
Gra
duati
ng
Insti
tuti
on
Co
ho
rtS
ame
Oth
er
Tota
lP
ct
1,0
27
41
5.5
1,9
62
11
415
.81,5
21
12
31
51.0
1,3
95
13
72
01
.41,2
87
55
10
.81
,84
91
15
16
.92,5
56
87
15
.62,5
95
07
7.3
389
12
01
23.1
5,3
63
01
1.0
565
01
1.2
1,9
61
02
2.1
1,3
51
02
2.1
388
01
1.3
Bachelo
rsD
eg
ree
150*
Tim
eG
raduati
ng
Insti
tuti
on
Oth
er
Tota
l
7302
29.4
150
1,0
28
52
.451
567
37
.339
433
31
.075
415
32
.2108
639
34.6
102
875
34
.2125
1,2
00
46.2
27
59
15
.24
01
3,5
23
65
.742
159
28.1
135
543
27.7
24
433
32.1
435
9.0
Tw
o-Y
ear
5,4
84
310
12
322
5.9
347
347
6.3
35
9624
11.3
8
Note
s/D
efi
nit
ions:
Begin
nin
gw
ith
the
2003-2
004
Acad
em
icY
ear:
LS
UA
transit
ioned
from
a2-y
ear
insti
tuti
on
toa
4-y
ear
insti
tuti
on
Fle
tcher
and
SOW
EL
Aw
ere
recogniz
ed
as
Technic
al
Com
munit
yC
oll
eges
FT
FC
ohort
defi
ned
as
Fir
st-
Tim
eF
ull
-Tim
estu
dents
,exclu
din
gth
ose
cla
ssif
ied
as
Oth
er
Underg
raduate
(OU
)-
15
0*
of
no
rmal
tim
e,
Sta
tus
(inclu
des
the
sum
mer
foll
ow
ing
thir
d/s
ixth
academ
icyear
-tr
ail
ing
sum
mer
)C
ert
ific
ate
/Dip
lom
a1.5
years
Associa
teD
egre
e=
3years
Sta
tus:
Inclu
ded
Bachelo
rsD
egre
e=
6years
Sta
tus:
Inclu
ded
1st
Aw
ard
(All
Levels
)represents
uniq
ue
count
of
cohort
receiv
ing
any
underg
raduate
aw
ard
at
an
yL
ouis
iana
Publi
cP
osts
econdary
Insti
tuti
on
wit
hin
15
0*
of
norm
al
tim
efo
rth
ele
vel
of
the
first
aw
ard
earn
ed.
Sam
e
295
878
516
394
340
531
773
1,0
75 32
3,1
22
117
40
84
09
31
Four-
Year
24
,20
97
64
6122
.58
,92
11
,29
010,2
11
42
.2
1st
Aw
ard
(All
Levels
)150*
Tim
eG
raduati
ng
Insti
tuti
on
---
-
Pct
Sam
eO
ther
Tota
lP
ct
29
98
30
72
9.8
9889
15
41,0
43
53.1
6523
54
57
73
7.9
44
01
45
44
53
1.9
0343
80
42
13
2.7
15
40
113
652
35
.26
78
1108
889
34
.78
1,0
75
13
11,2
05
46
.44
42
27
69
17
.74
3,1
22
40
23,5
23
65.6
91
17
43
160
28.3
24
08
13
75
45
27
.79
40
92
64
35
32
.20
31
536
9.2
8
8,9
80
1,3
33
10,3
07
42.5
8L
SU
E772
43
447
6.1
0148
148
19.2
43
152
183
23
.70
SU
SL
A409
59
160
14
.70
11
11
2.7
57
12
64
15.6
5B
RC
C1,0
51
22
32
52.4
07
97
97
.52
28
29
79.2
3B
PC
C577
37
138
6.6
043
43
7.5
37
44
73
12.6
5D
elg
ado
1,7
91
28
02
81.6
03
63
62
.024
36
58
3.2
4N
un
ez
328
72
92.7
03
3.9
75
11
3.3
5R
PC
C129
91
10
7.8
01
515
11
.69
16
24
18.6
0S
LC
C8
93
03
3.4
05
55.6
35
77
.87
LD
CC
60
10
11.7
07
711
.71
78
13.3
3F
letc
her
152
65
06
542.8
00
0.0
65
06
54
2.7
6S
ow
ela
126
36
036
28.6
00
0.0
34
03
426.9
8
Sta
teT
ota
l29,
69
3386
58
44
41
.58
,92
11,6
37
10,5
58
35
.6
302
9,2
82
1,6
92
10,9
31
36
.81
Und
ergr
adua
teC
ompl
eter
san
dA
war
dsC
ompa
red
toU
nder
grad
uate
Full-
Tim
eE
quiv
alen
tE
nrol
lmen
t
Und
ergr
adFT
EU
nder
grad
RE
2008
-09
2009
-10
Com
plet
ers
Com
plet
erA
war
dC
ompl
eter
sC
ompl
eter
Aw
ard
Sys
tem
Inst
itut
ion
Nam
e20
08-2
009
AY
per
Aw
ard
Rat
ioA
war
dsR
atio
2009
-201
0pe
r Aw
ard
Rat
ioA
war
dsR
atio
LSU
L.S.
U.
and
A&
MC
olle
ge23
,968
.84,
648
-O
.19
4,73
40.
2023
,741
.24,
312
0.18
4,38
8U
nive
rsit
yof
New
Orl
eans
7,51
2.2
1,28
60.
171,
356
0.18
7,61
7.8
1,29
50.
171,
347
-0.
18L.
S.U
.in
Shr
evep
ort
2,99
4.1
527
0.18
529
0.18
3,16
7.8
501
...
0.16
502
0.16
L.S.
U.
atA
lexa
ndri
a1,
944.
732
80.
1732
80.
171,
853.
626
40.
1426
50.
14L.
S.U
.at
Eun
ice
2,08
5.7
256
.-.
0.12
258
0.12
2,23
1.3
273
S0.
1227
70.
12LS
UT
otal
385056
7045
01
87
20
5019
386117
66
45
017
6779
018
ULS
Lou
isia
naT
ech
Uni
vers
ity7
678
51
400
018
141
60
187
578
81
340
018
135
40
18U
nive
rsit
yof
Lou
isia
naat
Laf
ayet
te13
264
42
117
016
212
40
1613
348
92
132
016
213
80
16S
outh
east
ern
Lou
isia
naU
nive
rsit
y12
042
81
939
016
194
70
1612
414
12
013
016
203
00
16U
nive
rsit
yof
Lou
isia
naat
Mon
roe
6,62
3.9
911
S0.
1492
3.
.0.
146,
741.
51,
094
0.16
1,10
4.
0.16
Gra
mbl
ing
Sta
teU
nive
rsity
475
15
574
012
586
012
444
06
729
016
748
017
McN
eese
Sta
teU
nive
rsit
y6
781
11
155
017
117
10
177
077
11
114
016
112
70
16N
icho
llsS
tate
Uni
vers
ity5
957
61
025
017
103
60
17
606
48
107
60
181
091
018
Nor
thw
este
rnS
tate
Uni
vers
ity
7,14
9.6
1,33
9-
0.19
1,36
40.
197,
304.
81,
346.
0.18
1,36
90.
19U
LST
otal
64,2
49.3
10,4
600.
1610
,567
...
0.16
64,9
70.7
10,8
44.
0.17
10,9
61....
0.17
SUS
outh
ern
Uni
vers
ity
and
A&
MC
olle
ge7,
051.
589
70.
1389
80.
136,
947.
486
9.-
.0.
1387
00.
13S
outh
ern
Uni
vers
ity
inN
ewO
rlea
ns1,
995.
223
80.
1223
90.
122,
326.
423
60.
1024
20.
10S
outh
ern
Uni
vers
ity
inS
hrev
epor
t1,
961.
929
50.
1531
30.
162,
394.
826
80.
1129
00.
12SU
Tot
al11
,008
.61,
430
.0.
132,
056
0.19
11,6
68.7
1,37
30.
121,
402
0.12
LCTC
SB
aton
Rou
geC
omm
unit
yC
olle
ge5,
253.
529
70.
0631
40.
065,
708.
446
8.
0.08
495
0.09
Bos
sier
Pari
shC
omm
unit
yC
olle
ge3,
522.
557
30.
1657
70.
164,
128.
375
60.
1876
00.
18D
elga
doC
omm
unit
yC
olle
ge10
,179
.41,
121
0.11
1,13
20.
1112
,161
.31,
296
0.11
1,32
10.
11E
lain
eP.
Nun
ezC
omm
unit
yC
olle
ge1,
048.
720
80.
2021
20.
201,
147.
525
10.
2225
20.
22L.
E.F
letc
her
Com
mun
ity
Tec
hnic
alCo
Il1,
006.
512
00.
1212
20.
121,
225.
222
30.
1824
20.
20L
ouis
iana
Del
taC
omm
unit
yC
olle
ge1,
105.
792
0.08
930.
081,
244.
199
0.08
990.
08R
iver
Par
ishe
sC
omm
unit
yC
olle
ge78
6.0
73.
0.09
740.
091,
038.
822
10.
2122
40.
22S
outh
Lou
isia
naC
omm
unit
yC
olle
ge2,
185.
239
90.
1840
10.
182,
502.
040
60.
1640
90.
16S
owel
aC
omm
unit
yT
echn
ical
Col
lege
1,58
3.8
342
0.22
357
0.23
1,83
7.4
572
0.31
628
0.34
LTC
Del
gado
819.
239
0.05
410.
0598
7.6
800.
0883
0.08
Aca
dian
aT
echn
ical
Col
lege
2,81
7.0
971
0.34
1,04
00.
373,
332.
41,
115
0.33
1,18
20.
35C
apita
lA
rea
Tec
hnic
alC
olle
ge2,
283.
874
60.
3382
70.
362,
482.
061
40.
2565
90.
27C
entr
alLA
Tec
hnic
alC
olle
ge2,
028.
156
20.
2857
20.
282,
497.
765
30.
2668
30.
27N
orth
east
Tec
hnic
alC
olle
ge1,
650.
347
00.
2851
00.
312,
053.
547
50.
2354
50.
27N
orth
shor
eT
echn
ical
Col
lege
1,74
5.5
442
0.25
547
0.31
2,25
0.0
479
0.21
540
0.24
Nor
thw
estL
AT
echn
ical
Col
lege
2,14
9.2
800
0.37
872
0.41
2,48
1.4
727
0.29
777
0.31
Sou
thC
entr
alLA
Tec
hnic
alC
olle
ge1,
370.
335
70.
2638
60.
281,
630.
145
40.
2850
00.
31LC
TCS
Tot
al41
,534
.87,
612
0.18
8,07
70.
1948
,707
.68,
889
0.18
9,39
90.
19
Sta
tew
ide
Tot
al15
5,29
8.2
26,5
470.
1727
,905
0.18
163,
958.
727
,751
0.17
28,5
410.
17