losses due to fluid friction · 2015-06-30 · ä to compare results with available theories and...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
1
Chapter 6
• Losses due to Fluid Friction
![Page 2: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
2
Objectives
ä To measure the pressure drop in the straight section of smooth, rough, and packed pipes as a function of flow rate.
ä To correlate this in terms of the friction factor and Reynolds number.
ä To compare results with available theories and correlations.
ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop
ä To show the relation between flow area, pressure drop and loss as a function of flow rate for Venturi meter and Orifice meter.
![Page 3: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
Losses due to Friction Mechanical energy equation between locations 1 and 2 in the absence of
shaft work:
For flow in a horizontal pipe and no diameter change (V1=V2), then :
21 PP
F
Thus, the shear
stress at the wall
is responsible for
the losses due to
friction
Losshg
zzg
V
g
V
g
P
g
P
F)()
22()( 21
2
2
2
121
Hagen-Poiseuille Law-E5.10
4
oD
128x QF
Because of (5.4) :
D
xF w
4
(6.13) (6.14)
m
Qu
Fwhere
=Friction head/unit mass
Or F/g= hLoss= 128μQL/(πρgD4)
g
PP
21
LhF/g
OR F in J/kg
and
![Page 4: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
4
Total head loss , hL (=F/g), is regarded as the sum of
major losses and minor losses
hL major, due to frictional effects in fully developed flow in
constant area tubes,
hL minor, resulting from entrance, fitting, area changes,
and so on.
Losses due to Friction
![Page 5: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Losses due to Friction/The Friction Factor In order to determine an expression for the losses due to friction we must
resort to experimentation.
D
V LF
2
By introducing the friction factor, f:
D.2
V f
2LF
where
)2/)(/( 2VDL
Ff
(6.15)
where L=length of the pipe,
D=diameter of the pipe,
V=velocity,
2/
)/(2V
LDPf
or
21 PP
F
f is called Darcy friction factor
![Page 6: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Friction Factor
0)2
(2
Lwork PPV
gzP
The Darcy friction factor f is defined as
We know the wall shear stress
2/
)/(2V
LDPf
L
PDτw
4
2/2Vf w
(E6-21)
The friction factor is the ratio between wall shear stress
and flow inertial force.
orLmajorLL PPP min,,
now later
and
![Page 7: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
7
Major Loss and Friction Factor
0)2
(2
Lwork PPV
gzP
With the introduction of friction factor, we can calculate major loss by
(E6-22) 2
2
,
V
D
LfP MajorL
Friction factor Pipe geometry factor Dynamic pressure
Therefore, our job now is find the friction factor f for various flows.
orLmajorLL PPP min,,
![Page 8: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
8
Friction Factor - Laminar Pipe
Flow For a pipe with a length of L, the pressure gradient is constant, the pressure
drop based on Hagen-Poiseuille Law ,
Divided both sides by the dynamic pressure V2/2 and L/D
We have
2/32 DVLP
Re
64f
Re
6464
2/
/32
2/
)/(2
2
2
VDL
D
V
DVL
V
LDPf
![Page 9: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
9
The mechanical energy equation can be written in terms of heads :
(6.17)
Knowledge of the friction factor allows us to estimate the loss term in
the energy equation.
This head loss can also be calculated using H-B equation
Loss
shafth
gm
Wzz
g
V
g
V
g
P
g
P
)()
22()( 21
2
2
2
121
g
V
D
Lfh MajorL
2
2
,
Major Loss and Friction Factor
![Page 10: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
10
![Page 11: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
11
Example 1
losses in
![Page 12: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
![Page 13: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Example 2
![Page 14: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
![Page 15: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
Case 2: Turbulent Flow When fluid flow at higher flow rates, the streamlines are not steady, not
straight and the flow is not laminar.
Generally, the flow field will vary in both space and time with fluctuations
that comprise "turbulence”
When the flow is turbulent the velocity and pressure fluctuate very
rapidly. The velocity components at a point in a turbulent flow field
fluctuate about a mean value.
n
R
r
V
u/1
max
1
Time-averaged velocity profile
can be expressed in terms of
the power law equation, n =7
is a good approximation.
![Page 16: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
Friction Factor-Turbulent Pipe Flow
•For a laminar flow, the friction factor can be analytically derived.
•It is impossible to do so for a turbulent flow so that we can only obtain the friction
factor from empirical results.
•For turbulent flow, it is impossible to analytically derive the friction factor f, which
can ONLY be obtained from experimental data.
• In addition, most pipes, except glass tubing, have rough surfaces.
•The pipe surface roughness is quantified by a dimensionless number, relative pipe
roughness (ε / D ), where ε is pipe roughness and D is pipe diameter.
•For laminar pipe flow, the flow is dominated by viscous effects hence surface
roughness is not a consideration.
•However, for turbulent flow, the surface roughness may protrude beyond the
laminar sublayer and affect the flow to a certain degree. Therefore, the friction factor
f can be generally written as a function of Reynolds number and pipe relative
roughness
There are several theoretical models available for the prediction of shear
stresses in turbulent flow.
![Page 17: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Surface Roughness Additional dimensionless group /D
need to be characterize
Thus more than one curve on friction factor-
Reynolds number plot
Fanning diagram or Moody diagram
Depending on the laminar region.
If, at the lowest Reynolds numbers, the laminar portion
corresponds to f =16/Re Fanning Chart
(or f = 64/Re Moody chart)
![Page 18: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
18
Friction Factor and Pipe Roughness
• Most pipes, except glass tubing, have rough
surfaces
- Pipe surface roughness,
- Relative pipe roughness,
• The surface roughness may affect the friction
factor. Generally, we have
D/
)(Re,D
f
![Page 19: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
19
Pipe Surface Roughness
![Page 20: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Friction Factor of Turbulent Flow
If the surface protrusions are
within the viscous layer, the pipe
is hydraulically smooth;
If the surface protrusions extend
into the buffer layer, f is a
function of both Re and /D;
For large protrusions into the
turbulent core, f is only a
function of /D.
)(Re, Df
)( Df
1/ 4
0.316
Ref
![Page 21: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Friction Factor for Smooth, Transition,
and Rough Turbulent flow
1
f 4.0 * log Re* f 0.4
Smooth pipe, Re>3000
1
f 4.0 * log
D
2.28
Rough pipe, [ (D/ε)/(Re√ƒ) <0.01]
1
f 4.0 * log
D
2.28 4.0 * log 4.67
D /
Re f1
Transition function
for both smooth and
rough pipe
f P
L
D
2U 2
f 0.079Re0.25Or
![Page 22: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
Fanning Diagram
f =16/Re
1
f 4.0 * log
D
2.28
1
f 4.0 * log
D
2.28 4.0 * log 4.67
D /
Re f1
![Page 23: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
Friction Factor – The Moody Chart
![Page 24: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
24
Example: Comparison of Laminar or
Turbulent pressure Drop
• Air under standard conditions flows through a 4.0-mm-
diameter drawn tubing with an average velocity of V = 50 m/s.
For such conditions the flow would normally be turbulent.
However, if precautions are taken to eliminate disturbances to
the flow (the entrance to the tube is very smooth, the air is dust
free, the tube does not vibrate, etc.), it may be possible to
maintain laminar flow.
• (a) Determine the pressure drop in a 0.1-m section of the tube
if the flow is laminar.
• (b) Repeat the calculations if the flow is turbulent.
Straight and horizontal pipe and same diameters give same velocity:
Z1=Z2=0 V1=V2 and thus
Losshgp /
![Page 25: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
Solution1/2
flowTurbulent700,13.../VDRe
Under standard temperature and pressure conditions
=1.23kg/m3, μ=1.7910-5Ns/m
The Reynolds number
kPaVD
fp 179.0...2
1 2
If the flow were laminar and using Darcy friction
f=64/Re=`…=0.00467
kPaVD
fp 179.0...2
14 2
F=16/Re=`…=0.001167
If the flow were laminar and using Fanning friction
![Page 26: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
Solution2/2
kPaVD
fp 076.1...2
1 2
If the flow were turbulent
From Moody chart f=Φ(Re, smooth pipe) =0.028
From Fanning chart f=Φ(Re, smooth pipe) =0.007
kPaVD
fp 076.1...2
14 2
![Page 27: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
Example
Straight and horizontal pipe and same diameters give
same velocity:
Z1=Z2=0 V1=V2 and thus
pressurepumpghp Loss
![Page 28: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
28
![Page 29: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
29
![Page 30: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
30
Example
0.04 m
![Page 31: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
31
![Page 32: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
32
![Page 33: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
33
f 0.079Re0.25
for fanning
![Page 34: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
34
Example: Determine Head Loss
• Crude oil at 140°F with γ=53.7 lb/ft3 and μ= 810-5
lb·s/ft2 (about four times the viscosity of water) is
pumped across Alaska through the Alaska pipeline, a
799-mile-along, 4-ft-diameter steel pipe, at a
maximum rate of Q = 2.4 million barrel/day = 117ft3/s,
or V=Q/A=9.31 ft/s. Determine the horsepower
needed for the pumps that drive this large system.
![Page 35: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
35
Solution1/2
The energy equation between points (1) and (2)
Assume that z1=z2, p1=p2=V1=V2=0 (large, open tank)
ftg
V
Dfhh PL 17700...
2
2
L2
2
22P1
2
11 hzg2
Vphz
g2
Vp
hP is the head provided to the
oil by the pump.
Minor losses are negligible because of the large length-
to-diameter ratio of the relatively straight, uninterrupted
pipe.
f=0.0124 from chart ε/D=(0.00015ft)/(4ft), Re=…..
![Page 36: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
36
Solution2/2
The actual power supplied to the fluid
power=Q∆P =Qρgh
unit of power (SI): Watt =N.m/s=J/s
hpslbft
hpgQhP 202000
/550
1...Power
![Page 37: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
37
Minor Losses 1/5
Most pipe systems consist of
considerably more than
straight pipes. These
additional components
(valves, bends, tees, and the
like) add to the overall head
loss of the system.
Such losses are termed
MINOR LOSS.
The flow pattern through a valve
![Page 38: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
38
900 Bend
900 Elbow 450 Elbow
Tees-line flow Tees-branch flow
![Page 39: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
39
Globe valve Angle valve Gate valve
Ball valve
Valves
![Page 40: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
40
Minor Losses 2/5
The theoretical analysis to predict the details of flow
pattern (through these additional components) is not,
as yet, possible.
The head loss information for essentially all
components is given in dimensionless form and based
on experimental data.
The most common method used to determine these
head losses or pressure drops is to specify the loss
coefficient, KL
![Page 41: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
41
Minor Losses 3/5
2
L2
2
L
L V2
1Kp
V2
1
p
g2/V
hK ormin
Re),geometry(KL
f
DK
g
V
Df
g
VKh
Leq
eq
LL or
22
22
minMinor losses are sometimes
given in terms of an
equivalent length eq
The actual value of KL is strongly dependent on the
geometry of the component considered. It may also
dependent on the fluid properties. That is
![Page 42: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
42
Minor Losses 4/5
For many practical applications the Reynolds number is large enough so that the flow through the component is dominated by inertial effects, with viscous effects being of secondary importance.
In a flow that is dominated by inertia effects rather than viscous effects, it is usually found that pressure drops and head losses correlate directly with the dynamic pressure.
This is the reason why the friction factor for very large Reynolds number, fully developed pipe flow is independent of the Reynolds number.
![Page 43: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
43
Minor Losses 5/5
This is true for flow through pipe components.
Thus, in most cases of practical interest the loss
coefficients for components are a function of
geometry only,
)geometry(KL
![Page 44: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
44
Minor Losses Coefficient
For Example Entrance flow
Entrance flow condition
and loss coefficient
(a) re-entrant, KL = 0.8
(b) sharp-edged, KL =
0.5
(c) slightly rounded,
KL = 0.2
(d) well-rounded,
KL = 0.04
![Page 45: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
45
Summary of Minor Losses • Major losses: Associated with the friction in the straight portions of the
pipes
• Minor losses: Due to additional components (pipe fittings, valves,
bends, tees etc.) and to changes in flow area (contractions or
expansions)
Method 1: We try to express the head loss due to minor losses in
terms of a loss coefficient, KL:
g2
VK
g
F 2
L
lossesminor
Values of KL can be found in the literature (for example, see Table next
ppt, for losses due to pipe components.
![Page 46: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
46
Minor Losses Component KL
Elbows
Regular 90°, flanged 0.3
Regular 90°, threaded 1.5
Long radius 90°, flanged 0.2
Long radius 90°, threaded 0.7
Long radius 45°, flanged 0.2
Regular 45°, threaded 0.4
180° return bends
180° return bend, threaded 0.2
180° return bend, flanged 1.5
Tees
Line flow, flanged 0.2
Line flow, threaded 0.9
Branch flow, flanged 1.0
Branch flow, threaded 2.0
Component KL
Union, threaded 0.8
Valves
Globe, fully open 10
Angle, fully open 2
Gate, fully open 0.15
Gate, ¼ closed 0.26
Gate, ½ closed 2.1
Gate, ¾ closed 17
Ball valve, fully open 0.05
Ball valve, 1/3 closed 5.5
Ball valve, 2/3 closed 210
![Page 47: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
47
Minor Losses The mechanical energy equation can be written:
g
VK
g
V
D
Lf
gm
Wzz
g
V
g
V
g
P
g
P
L
shaft
22
)()22
()(
22
21
2
2
2
121
(6.22)
![Page 48: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
48
Minor Losses Method 2:
Using the concept of equivalent length, which is the
equivalent length of pipe which would have the same
friction effect as the fitting.
Values of equivalent length (L/D) can be found in the literature
g
V
D
Lf
gm
Wzz
g
V
g
V
g
P
g
P
equiv
shaft
2 )()
22()(
2
.
21
2
2
2
121
(6.23)
![Page 49: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
49
Example: Determine Pressure Drop
• Water at 60°F flows from the basement to the second
floor through the 0.75-in. diameter copper pipe (a drawn
tubing) at a rate of Q = 12.0 gal/min (= 0.0267 ft3/s) and
exits through a faucet of diameter 0.50 in. as shown in
Figure
Determine the pressure at
point (1) if: (a) all losses
are neglected, (b) the
only losses included are
major losses, or (c) all
losses are included.
![Page 50: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
50
Solution1/4
The energy equation
45000/VDReft/slb1034.2
ft/slug94.1s/ft70.8...A
QV
25
3
1
1
s/ft6.19...A/QV
)jetfree(0p,ft20z,0z
22
221
Lhzg
V
g
pz
g
V
g
p 2
2
221
2
11
22
The flow is turbulent
L
2
1
2
221
21 h)VV(zp
Head loss is different
for each of the three
cases.
![Page 51: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
51
Solution2/4
(a) If all losses are neglected (hL=0)
45000Re108D/000005.0 5
psi7.10ft/lb1547...)VV(zp 22
1
2
221
21
f = 0.0215
(b) If the only losses included are the major losses, the head
loss is
g
V
DfhL
2
2
1 chart
psiftlbV
D
ftfVVzp 3.21/3062...
2
)60(4)( 2
2
12
1
2
221
21
![Page 52: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
52
Solution3/4
(c) If major and minor losses are included
]2)5.1(410[2
)/70.8()/94.1(3.21
23.21
22)(
23
2
1
22
12
1
2
221
21
sftftslugspsi
VKpsip
VK
g
V
DfVVzp
L
L
psi5.30psi17.9psi3.21p1
![Page 53: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
53
![Page 54: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
54
![Page 55: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
55
Noncircular Ducts
The empirical correlations for pipe flow may be used for computations involving noncircular ducts, provided their cross sections are not too exaggerated.
The correlation for turbulent pipe flow are extended for use with noncircular geometries by introducing the hydraulic diameter, Dh, defined as
P
A4Dh
Where A is cross-
sectional area, and
P is wetted perimeter.
![Page 56: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
56
Noncircular Ducts 3/4
The friction factor can be written as f=C/Reh, where the
constant C depends on the particular shape of the duct, and
Reh is the Reynolds number based on the hydraulic diameter.
The hydraulic diameter is also used in the definition of the
friction factor, , and the relative
roughness /Dh. )g2/V)(D/(fh 2
hL
hD V
Re
![Page 57: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
57
Non circular conduits
Define hydraulic diameter, Dh:
perimeter wetted
area) sectional (crossx 4Dh
Then use Reynolds number based on hydraulic diameter, Dh:
hD V
Re
![Page 58: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
58
Non circular conduits
• Pipe of circular cross-section
DD4
D4
D
2
h
• Annulus (inside diameter D1, outside D2)
12
12
2
1
2
2
h DDDD
4
D
4
D4
D
• Rectangular conduit (area ab)
ba
ab2
b2a2
)ab(4Dh
![Page 59: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
59
Example
Solved before
![Page 60: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
60
![Page 61: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
61
Multiple Pipe Systems
• Pipes in series
321BA LLLL
321
FFFF
QQQ
![Page 62: Losses due to Fluid Friction · 2015-06-30 · ä To compare results with available theories and correlations. ä To determine the influence of pipe fittings on pressure drop ä To](https://reader033.vdocuments.us/reader033/viewer/2022042009/5e714e4de5db5324b14667ed/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
62
Multiple Pipe Systems
• Parallel pipes
321 LLL
321
FFF
QQQQ