los amigos park water harvest and direct use project study ... amigos...los amigos park, a combined...

Los Amigos Park Water Harvest and Direct Use Project Study Report

FINAL November 2014

1561 E. Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite 240 Fullerton, California 92831 TEL (714) 526-7500 | FAX (714) 526-7004 www.cwecorp.com

Los Amigos Park Water Harvest and Direct Use Project Study Report

FINAL

Prepared for:

City of Santa Monica

Civil Engineering Division 1437 4th Street, Suite 300

Santa Monica, California 90401 TEL (310) 458-8411

Prepared by:

1561 E. Orangethorpe Avenue, Suite 240

Fullerton, California, 92831

TEL (714) 526-7500 | FAX (714) 526-7004 | www.cwecorp.com

November 24, 2014

City of Santa Monica Los Amigos Park Water Harvest and Direct Use Project Study Report

Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS ................................................................................................................. iii

APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................. iv

LIST OF FIGURES ...................................................................................................................... iv

LIST OF TABLES ......................................................................................................................... iv

ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................. v

1. PROJECT PURPOSE AND SCOPE ......................................................................................... 6

2. EXISTING CONDITIONS ..................................................................................................... 7

2.1 TOPOGRAPHY ........................................................................................................................... 7 2.2 ON-SITE DRAINAGE ................................................................................................................... 8 2.3 TMDLS AND 303(D) LISTINGS ..................................................................................................... 9 2.4 GEOTECHNICAL FINDINGS .......................................................................................................... 10 2.5 UTILITIES .............................................................................................................................. 10 2.6 HISTORICAL LAND USE ............................................................................................................. 11

3. HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULICS ....................................................................................... 13

3.1 STUDY AREA .......................................................................................................................... 13 3.1.1 Hydrologic Soil Type ...................................................................................................... 14 3.1.2 Land Use ...................................................................................................................... 15 3.1.3 Watershed Delineation .................................................................................................. 16

3.2 RAINFALL - RUNOFF RELATIONSHIP .............................................................................................. 17 3.3 CATCHMENT RUNOFF FLOW RATE AND VOLUME ............................................................................... 18 3.4 HYDRAULIC ANALYSIS ............................................................................................................... 18

3.4.1 Computer Model ........................................................................................................... 18 3.4.2 Manning's n-values ....................................................................................................... 19 3.4.3 Existing Conditions Model Results .................................................................................. 19

4. PROPOSED CONDITIONS .................................................................................................. 20

4.1 WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ALTERNATIVE #1 ........................................................................... 20 4.1.1 Cost Estimate ............................................................................................................... 21

4.2 WATER QUALITY IMPROVEMENT ALTERNATIVE #2 ........................................................................... 22 4.2.1 Cost Estimate ............................................................................................................... 23

4.3 RISK ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................... 23 4.4 ALTERNATIVE COMPARISON ....................................................................................................... 24 4.5 PUBLIC EDUCATION AND OUTREACH ............................................................................................. 24

5. APPROVALS AND ANTICIPATED REQUIREMENTS ............................................................ 27

5.1 DIVISION OF STATE ARCHITECTS ................................................................................................. 27 5.2 CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION ............................................................................................. 27 5.3 LOS ANGELES COUNTY HEALTH DEPARTMENT ................................................................................. 28

5.3.1 Irrigation Reuse ............................................................................................................ 28 5.3.2 Toilet Flushing Reuse .................................................................................................... 28

5.4 LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT .......................................................................... 28 5.5 SANTA MONICA-MALIBU UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT ........................................................................ 29 5.6 ADDITIONAL REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................................................... 29

6. REFERENCES ..................................................................................................................... 30

- iii -


Appendices Appendix A Hydrologic Calculations using the Time of Concentration Calculator Appendix B Existing LACDPW Hydrology/Hydraulic Calculations and WSPG Hydraulic Model Results Appendix C WSPG Hydraulic Model Output Appendix D Water Quality Results from the Diversion Manhole Appendix E Contact List Appendix F DSA References Appendix G October 13, 2014 Meeting Summary Appendix H California Coastal Commission References Appendix I LACDPH Permit References Appendix J LACFCD Connection Permit References Appendix K City of Santa Monica Permit References

List of Figures Figure 2-1 Location Map ..................................................................................................................... 7 Figure 2-2 Topographic Map ............................................................................................................... 8 Figure 2-3 On-Site Drainage ............................................................................................................... 9 Figure 2-4 Sewer, Water, and Storm Drain Utilities............................................................................. 11 Figure 3-1 Los Amigos Park Study Area ............................................................................................. 14 Figure 3-2 Hydrologic Soil Type ........................................................................................................ 15 Figure 3-3 Land Use ......................................................................................................................... 16 Figure 3-4 Longest Flow Path ........................................................................................................... 17 Figure 4-1 Schematic Layout of Project Alternative #1 ....................................................................... 20 Figure 4-2 Schematic Layout of Project Alternative #2 ....................................................................... 22

List of Tables Table 3-1 Land Use Summary ........................................................................................................... 15 Table 3-2 Summary of Rainfall-Runoff Relationships ........................................................................... 17 Table 3-3 Summary of Hydrologic Calculations for the 85th Percentil Rain Event ................................... 18 Table 3-4 Summary of Hydrologic Calculations for the 10-year Rain Event ........................................... 18 Table 3-5 Existing Conditions Summary of Hydraulic Calculations ........................................................ 19 Table 4-1 Preliminary Class D Cost Estimate for Alternative #1 ........................................................... 21 Table 4-2 Preliminary Class D Cost Estimate for Alternative #2 ........................................................... 23 Table 4-3 Project Risk Assessment Summary ..................................................................................... 23 Table 4-4 Pros and Cons for Project Alternatives ................................................................................ 24

- iv -


Acronyms CDS Continuous Deflection Separation CWA Clean Water Act DSA Division of State Architects EGL Energy Grade Line GIS Geographical Information System LACDPH Los Angeles County Department of Public Health LACDPW Los Angeles County Department of Public Works LACFCD Los Angeles County Flood Control District LCP Local Coastal Program LUP Land Use Plan MODRAT Modified Rational Method MSL Mean Sea Level PTSA Parent Teacher Student Association RCP Reinforced Concrete Pipe SMASH Santa Monica Alternative School House SMMUSD Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District TMDL Total Maximum Daily Load USEPA United States Environmental Protection Agency USGS United States Geological Survey WSE Water Surface Elevation WSPG Water Surface Pressure Gradient

- v -


1. Project Purpose and Scope The Los Amigos Park Water Harvesting and Direct Use Demonstration Project (Project) is undertaken by the City of Santa Monica (City) to demonstrate the effectiveness of harvesting urban runoff for beneficial uses. The harvested urban runoff will replace indoor flushing and a portion of the irrigation demands, which were previously satisfied by potable water supplies. The direct harvest of wet- and dry-weather urban runoff will also aide in the restoration and protection of Santa Monica Bay through the removal of potential pollutants that may be present in runoff. The Project is expected to treat up to 100,000 gallons of stormwater and dry-weather runoff annually. The demonstration project will provide insight into the feasibility of using runoff for non-potable purposes and will provide results on design, installation, water quality improvements, and operation which will be relevant and transferable to other Southern California projects. Benefit-cost analysis and technical knowledge will be obtained to help decision-makers in future water harvesting and water quality projects. Data on water quality will be generated through monitoring of the influent and effluent, which can be used to help water management professionals meet the water quality requirements and TMDLs of downstream water bodies. Results can also be used by public health, building, and safety officials to help implement standards and codes that enhance the implementation of future projects. Upon completion, the Project will provide an innovative water resource which will break down barriers to local water resource development. Los Amigos Park, a combined use public community park and athletic field for the Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District (SMMUSD), is located in the south-western quadrant of the City. The northwest portion of the park, adjacent to Hollister Avenue, is planned to house the majority of the Project. A Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) storm drain runs west, adjacent to the park under 5th Street. The storm drain receives runoff from a 50-acre densely urbanized watershed. Stormwater and dry-weather discharges will be diverted from the storm drain into a pre-treatment system before entering an underground cistern for storage. After passing through a multi-stage treatment, water will be delivered into the adjacent park restrooms for indoor flushing, as well as the park irrigation system.

- 6 -


2. Existing Conditions Los Amigos Park is surrounded by urban development including high- and medium-density housing, educational facilities, and park open spaces. Located in the City of Santa Monica, the park is in close proximity to the City of Los Angeles’ neighborhood of Venice, as well as the Pacific Ocean. Los Amigos Park is adjacent to John Muir Elementary and Santa Monica Alternative School House (SMASH), and is associated with the address 500 Hollister Avenue, Santa Monica, California. The County Assessor’s Parcel Number for the property is 4287-006-900, of which the park occupies the northwest portion, with John Muir Elementary and SMASH occupying the rest of the parcel. The parcel is bound by Hollister Avenue to the north, 6th Street to the east, Ocean Park Boulevard to the south, and 5th Street to the west. Figure 2-1 shows the location of the project site.

Figure 2-1 Location Map

2.1 Topography Los Amigos Park is approximately 4 acres, not including John Muir Elementary School, and is fully developed as a recreational field and athletic facility. The park contains a multi-use athletic field, baseball field, tennis courts, basketball court, and handball court. As such, the topography of the Project site is nearly flat, with a very mild slope in the southwest direction. The slope of the site is not continuous with the surrounding area; the northeast edge of the park is below street level, while the southwest edge is offset approximately 2 feet above curb level. The elevation within the park is approximately 70 feet

- 7 -


above mean sea level (MSL). Figure 2-2 illustrates 20-foot contours as identified by the United States Geological Survey (USGS) topographic maps (USGS, 2014).

Figure 2-2 Topographic Map

2.2 On-Site Drainage Stormwater runoff from Los Amigos Park sheet flows into the unpaved athletic field. The athletic field has several french drains which convey runoff onto 5th Street on the southwest edge of the park. A curb inlet on the corner of 5th Street and Hollister Avenue collects runoff from the park and conveys it to Project No. 578. Project No. 578 is a 45-inch Reinforced Concrete Pipe (RCP) adjacent to the park and a 48-inch RCP downstream of the manhole on 5th Street and Hollister Avenue. Figure 2-3 illustrates the Project's on-site drainage patterns.

- 8 -


Figure 2-3 On-Site Drainage

2.3 TMDLs and 303(d) Listings Section 303(d) of the Clean Water Act (CWA) requires the establishment of a list of impaired and threatened waters also known as the 303(d) List. The 303(d) List identifies water bodies where required pollution controls are not sufficient to attain or maintain applicable water quality standards and establishes priorities for development of Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDLs) based on the severity of the pollution and the sensitivity of the beneficial uses (USEPA, 2012). A TMDL is the maximum amount of specific pollutant that a water body can receive from all sources in addition to a margin of safety while still meeting water quality standards. The Project involves the diversion and use of urban runoff (wet- and dry-weather) that would normally discharge into the Santa Monica Bay, therefore the 303(d) listed water bodies of Santa Monica Beach and Santa Monica Bay are applicable to this project. The Basin Plan for the Coastal Watershed of Los Angeles and Ventura (Basin Plan) defines the water bodies in the Los Angeles and Ventura region and designates beneficial uses for each of the water bodies which impact the development of TMDLs (LARWQCB, 1994). Santa Monica Bay and Beach are designated Recreation 1 (REC-1) and Recreation 2 (REC-2) beneficial uses, meaning that recreational activities occur with and without contact with the water. Additionally, navigation (NAV), commercial and sport fishing (COMM), marine habitat (MAR), wildlife habitat (WILD), migration of aquatic organisms (MIGR), spawning, reproduction, and/or early development (SPWN), and shellfish harvesting (SHELL) beneficial uses are also identified in the Basin Plan.

- 9 -


The following impairments, through TMDLs and 303(d) Listings have been identified for the Santa Monica Beaches and/or Bay:

TMDLs • Santa Monica Bay Beaches Bacteria TMDL • Santa Monica Bay Nearshore and Offshore Debris TMDL • Santa Monica Bay TMDL for DDTs and PCBs

303(d) Listings • Santa Monica Bay Nearshore and Offshore Fish Consumption Advisory • Santa Monica Bay Nearshore and Offshore Sediment Toxicity

The Santa Monica Bay Beaches Bacteria TMDL became effective July 15, 2003 and was reconsidered and modified. The modifications became effective on July 2, 2014. This TMDL protects the beaches from high indicator bacterial counts during both dry- and wet-weather. The Santa Monica Bay Nearshore and Offshore Debris TMDL became effective March 20, 2012 and requires zero trash discharge by May 2020. The Santa Monica Bay TMDL for DDTs and PCBs was established in 2012 by the USEPA and is associated with fish consumption advisories, setting compliance limits for fish tissue. 2.4 Geotechnical Findings The J. Byer Group, Inc. performed geotechnical engineering exploration for Los Amigos Park on June 25 and 27, 2002. The resulting report, Geotechnical Engineering Exploration, Santa Monica Parks Building Replacement Project – Phase I, exhibits geotechnical considerations relevant to the Project. Seven hand auger borings were performed to a maximum depth of 10 feet, with samples obtained throughout the borings. Five borings were performed near the northeast edge of the park, where the restroom, concession stand, and baseball field are located, and the other two borings were performed near the southwest corner of the park. Groundwater was not encountered during any of the seven borings. Earth materials discovered in the borings consisted mainly of fill and disturbed alluvium, consisting of silty sand and light gray to brown sand of high moisture content and medium density. Natural alluvium was found underlying the park, with layers of sand, clayey sand, sandy clay, and clay. The clays encountered were found to be gray to dark gray, moist to very moist, and firm to stiff. Geotechnologies Inc. performed a geotechnical investigation along Ocean Park Boulevard, that included Los Amigos Park, in September 2009 and June 2010, for which the findings were summarized in a geotechnical report (2010). The investigation included two borings within the southern area of the park which encountered fill deposits underlain by alluvium and shallow marine sediments. Groundwater was not encountered during the exploration within the park, but the investigation included a review of the applicable Seismic Hazard Evaluation Report, Plate 1.2, Historically Highest Groundwater Contours which indicated the highest groundwater levels along Ocean Park Boulevard being forty feet below grade. Percolation tests were performed during the geotechnical investigation and found a percolation rate of ½ inch per hour in the underlying native soils Additional soil borings will be required prior to the final design of the Project. The boring(s) must be performed to a depth greater than the proposed system invert, which is dependent on the chosen alternative discussed in Section 4. 2.5 Utilities A review of the utilities in and around Los Amigos Park shows minimal intrusion within the park. The City maintains nine street light fixtures within the park, with connections maintained along 6th Street near Hollister Avenue and a pad mounted cabinet and pull box nearby. Irrigation piping, sourced from water

- 10 -


mains along 5th Street, 6th Street, and Hollister Avenue, are dispersed throughout the park, with additional piping from 6th Street servicing the park’s restroom and other facilities. On the streets adjacent to the park, several utility lines exist which are owned by the City and private utility companies. Active water mains run through 5th Street, 6th Street, Hollister Avenue, and Ocean Park Boulevard. Sewer mains can be found along 6th Street, 5th Street, and Hollister Avenue. The sewer and water facilities owned and operated by the City, along with the storm drain facilities owned by the LACFCD are illustrated in Figure 2-4.

Figure 2-4 Sewer, Water, and Storm Drain Utilities

Regarding privately owned and operated utilities; the Southern California Gas Company maintains natural gas pipelines which run on both 5th and 6th Street on the side of the street furthest from the park, with supply lines servicing the adjacent educational facilities. Within the park, various utilities exist including sewer, irrigation, and power lines. 2.6 Historical Land Use Section 10 of the Phase I Environmental Assessment Los Amigos Park, prepared by SCS Engineers for the City of Santa Monica (2014), describes the history of the land that the park currently occupies. According to the assessment, two small residential structures were built on the otherwise undeveloped land prior to 1918. Nearby land use was, and remains, mainly residential and educational. The property continues to be primarily undeveloped until a 1947 photograph, which depicts the property fully populated with small

- 11 -


structures that appear to be barracks. By 1952, the buildings on the property are razed and it appears to revert to vacant land. The property begins its current use with a lease to the Santa Monica-Malibu School District in 1954 for use as a park. By 1966, the property is known as Los Amigos Park and includes a few small structures on the north and south boundaries. A baseball diamond on the northeast end of the park can be identified by 1966, with an associated structure on the eastern side of the park. Currently, the park remains largely unchanged in layout, with major changes being the 1995 removal of an underground storage tank, a 1999 electrical permit being issued to the park, and the 2001 construction of 4 new buildings on the eastern edge of the park.

- 12 -


3. Hydrology and Hydraulics The hydrology and hydraulics relevant to the watershed area were conducted. Hydrologic studies within Los Angeles County are required to use the modified rational method (MODRAT) developed by LACFCD. The Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW) developed a Hydrology Manual (2006) which outlines the methodology used for conducting a hydrologic analysis. The hydraulic analysis used project as-builts for the general geometry of the storm drain and computed the hydraulic grade line (HGL) and energy grade line (EGL) using the computer program F0515P, developed and accepted by LACFCD and titled Water Surface Pressure Gradient (WSPG). Input parameters of hydrologic discharge and water surface elevations (WSEs) for the tributary watershed were received from the LACDPW Design Division. 3.1 Study Area The catchment area tributary to the Project site is within the Santa Monica Bay Watershed and the Kenter Canyon Subwatershed in the County of Los Angeles. The Kenter Canyon Subwatershed, shown in Figure 3-1, discharges runoff from an area over 4,000 acres where Pico Boulevard reaches the Santa Monica Bay. The Project catchment area is approximately 50 acres and drainage is conveyed directly by LACFCD Bond Issue Project No. 578 into MTD No. 1729, a 96-inch RCP, which outlets into Santa Monica Bay adjacent to the Pico Kenter Canyon Storm Drain (LACDPW, 2005). The Project will divert runoff from a manhole on 5th Street and Hollister Avenue that receives runoff from a 45-inch RCP, which transitions to a 48-inch RCP at this manhole.

- 13 -


Figure 3-1 Los Amigos Park Study Area

3.1.1 Hydrologic Soil Type Consistent with the methodology described in the LACDPW Hydrology Manual (2006), the hydrologic soil type defined in the Hydrology Manual was used for analyzing the hydrology. Figure 3-2 demonstrates the soil types within the Los Amigos Park catchment area, where both soil type 013 (Ramona Loam) and 014 (Ramona Sandy Loam) dominate. For hydrologic calculations soil type 014 was assumed for the entire catchment because it is slightly more dominant and the runoff coefficient curve is more conservative.

- 14 -


Figure 3-2 Hydrologic Soil Type

3.1.2 Land Use The Project catchment area is made up of mostly residential land uses including high-density residential areas comprised of low rise apartments, townhomes, and condominiums, and mixed residential areas based on the LACDPW land use Geographical Information System (GIS) data. This data identifies the average impervious area associated with each land use type which was used for the hydrologic analysis. Table 3-1 summarizes the land uses within the Project catchment area and identifies the imperviousness of the catchment based on the weighted average. The land use delineation is provided in Figure 3-3.

Table 3-1 Land Use Summary Land Use Category % Impervious Area (acres) % of Catchment

Local Parks and Recreation 10 7.8 16 Government Offices 91 0.2 01

Low-Rise Apartment, etc. 86 22.8 46 Mixed Residential 59 18.9 38 64 49.7 100 1 0.004%

- 15 -


Figure 3-3 Land Use

3.1.3 Watershed Delineation The catchment tributary to the Project site was delineated based on the Kenter Canyon subwatershed boundaries. Existing storm drain plans were reviewed to better understand the drainage conveyed through subsurface infrastructure and the topography was reviewed to determine street drainage. Generally speaking, the catchment drains from east to west. The methodology identified in the LACDPW Hydrology Manual (2006) requires the longest flow path and corresponding slope to be identified for the catchment. The longest flow path was determined based on the materials reviewed and field verified. The slope was estimated based on topographic data identified in Section 2.1. Figure 3-4 identifies the longest flow path and slope used for hydrologic calculations.

- 16 -


Figure 3-4 Longest Flow Path

3.2 Rainfall - Runoff Relationship In urban areas, the design rainfall is the 25-year rainfall event, except where there is a sump which requires drainage. Drains that remove water from sumps must carry runoff from the 50-year rainfall event. All other drains must carry at least the 10-year, with streets carrying the remainder of flow. If flow depths exceed the property line or street capacity, the drain size must be increased until the requirements are met. For water quality considerations, the 85th percentile rainfall depth must be treated. Full treatment of the 85th percentile, 24-hour storm event is not anticipated under this project scope, but is provided for future project phases. The 85th percentile, 24-hour storm event depth and the 10-year storm depth based on the LACDPW 85th Percentile 24-hour Rainfall Depth Analysis (2004) and Hydrology Manual (2006) are identified in Table 3-2. All volume calculations use the 24-hour unit hyetograph with the design rainfall depth to generate runoff hydrographs.

Table 3-2 Summary of Rainfall-Runoff Relationships Storm Event Frequency Storm Depth (inches)

85th Percentile 1.05 10-year 4.10

- 17 -


3.3 Catchment Runoff Flow Rate and Volume The LACDPW time of concentration (Tc) volume calculator was used to determine the time of concentration for the catchment tributary to the Project site. The Tc calculator performs calculations consistent with MODRAT and approved by Los Angeles County. The Tc calculator output is summarized in Table 3-3. The undeveloped runoff coefficient (Cu) is determined based on the soil within the catchment area and the developed runoff coefficient (Cd) is determined based on Cu and the percent of impervious area. The Tc calculator input and output is provided in Appendix A.

Table 3-3 Summary of Hydrologic Calculations for the 85th Percentil Rain Event Storm Event Frequency Cu Cd Tc (min) Peak Flow Rate

(cubic ft/second) Runoff Volume

(acre-feet) 85th Percentile 0.1 0.6 30 8.19 2.62

The 10-year return frequency event peak discharge was calculated by LACFCD using the rational method in use at the time of Project 578 design and construction (May 22, 1962). These values were received from the LACDPW Design Division archive records and are summarized in Table 3-4 and included in Appendix B.

Table 3-4 Summary of Hydrologic Calculations for the 10-year Rain Event Storm Event Frequency Cd Tc (min) Peak Flow Rate

(cubic ft/second) 10-year 0.7 17 71.9

3.4 Hydraulic Analysis Hydraulic analysis conducted for the Project used as-builts for the general geometry of the existing storm drain and computed the HGL and EGL using the computer program WSPG, developed and accepted by LACFCD. For this study, the 10-year return frequency storm event was analyzed for 1,000-feet downstream and 1,500-feet upstream of the proposed diversion manhole. The design flow rate and the WSEs upstream and downstream were obtained from the LACDPW Design Division archive records for the 10-year event. 3.4.1 Computer Model The computer model WSPG is a Fortran based program developed by the LACFCD Design Systems and Standards Group of the Design Division. It has been licensed to different software developers to produce pre- and post-processing add-ons to promote ease of use through a graphic interface. WSPG computes and plots uniform and non-uniform steady flow, water surface profiles in open channels or closed conduits with irregular and regular sections. The computational procedure is based on solving Bernoulli's equation for the total energy at each section and uses Manning's formula for friction loss between sections in a reach. The program uses basic mathematical and hydraulic principles to calculate cross sectional flow area, wetted perimeter, normal depth, critical depth, pressure, and momentum. The pre-processing unit of the program translates input into an ASCII text file that is read by the Fortran computational engine which in-turn produces an output file in text format which can be translated by word processing software. For this study, the output files provide the water depth, WSE, and EGL throughout the system and are provided in Appendix C.

- 18 -


3.4.2 Manning's n-values Project 578, Line "J" was constructed entirely of RCP which has a recommended unitless value in "Good" condition of 0.013. The recommended Manning's n-values were used in the WSPG model. 3.4.3 Existing Conditions Model Results The as-builts for Project 578, Line "J", show the diversion manhole at the northwest corner of 5th Street and Hollister Avenue at Station 31+58.90. At this manhole, the main line cross-section transitions from a 45-inch RCP to a 48-inch RCP with a lateral connection consisting of an 18-inch RCP. Table 3-5 tabulates the results of the WSPG output files at the manhole and the full model output is provided in Appendix C.

Table 3-5 Existing Conditions Summary of Hydraulic Calculations

Storm Event Frequency

Qp

(cfs)

Diversion Manhole Station

Invert Elevation

(ft)

Normal depth

(ft)

WSE (ft)

Velocity (ft/sec)

EGL Elev (ft)

10-year 80.4 31+58.90 57.07 3.83 60.9 6.49 61.55 The WSPG model results were compared to the existing ground surface elevation to determine the depth to water surface in the manhole. The manhole cover is at an elevation of 65.58 feet with the depth to water surface equal to 4.66 feet for the 10-year event. The EGL determines the amount of energy head available to drive water into the Project. The values noted for the manhole above include computed head losses for friction, entrance and exit conditions, and losses through the devices. The EGL corresponds with the maximum elevation the proposed storage units and gross pollutant pre-treatment devices can be. The proposed conditions will be calculated during design phase as the layout and sizing is finalized.

- 19 -


4. Proposed Conditions The goal of the Project is to address water quality issues related to Santa Monica Bay TMDLs and to eventually meet MS4 Permit EWMP project requirements by retaining the 85th percentile, 24-hour storm event. The Project will be sized for two phases: 1) to maximize currently available funds, and 2) future phases of the project will provide the remaining capacity for retention to be considered an EWMP project. This section describes the design concept that will be utilized for the Project and the associated cost. 4.1 Water Quality Improvement Alternative #1 The Project will harvest and use urban runoff for irrigation and toilet flushing, as infiltration is not preferred within educational facilities and Los Amigos Park is constructed within John Muir Elementary school. A schematic drawing of improvement alternative #1 is provided in Figure 4-1, including the anticipated limits of excavation assuming a 1:1 slope to the invert with a four foot vertical drop. The excavation required to avoid shoring requirements will result in stockpiles during the storage system installation phase of construction. The stockpile configuration will depend on the contractor's preferences and construction methods, but will remain within the baseball field. The Project will divert flows from Project No. 578 at the existing manhole near the 5th Street and Hollister Avenue intersection. The storm drain diversion line will be sized to convey the 85th percentile, 24-hour storm event peak flow (8.19 cubic feet per second).

Figure 4-1 Schematic Layout of Project Alternative #1

- 20 -


The storm drain diversion line will deliver runoff to a pre-treatment screening/separation device such as a continuous deflection separation (CDS) unit. The pre-treatment device will be sized for the full 85th percentile, 24-hour storm event. It will screen, separate, and trap gross solids to remove floatables and neutrally buoyant materials. Runoff will be stored in underground chambers following pre-treatment. A stub out from the storage system will be included in the Project so that an additional storage system can be added to satisfy EWMP project requirements. Runoff will be conveyed through a second treatment system which will utilize ultra violet technology before it is pumped for non-potable water uses. Water quality data was at the proposed diversion manhole to help determine the size and type of screening that will be required as part of the ultra violet treatment system. The results represent the worst case scenario because once the complete system is installed the flows will receive pre-treatment where larger particles will be trapped and smaller particles that bypass will be settled out in the storage area. This laboratory results can be found in Appendix D. The storage system, non-potable water lines, and irrigation system will be sized based on the total construction cost, demand, and make-up water needs. The water demand associated with toilet flushing is approximately 100,000 gallons per year based on last year's water use. The system will also supplement park irrigation for a portion of the park. The irrigation system was sized assuming a fixed construction cost of $1.1 million (construction plus contingency). For alternative #1, the system will supplement irrigation to 24 percent of the park based on the 2013 irrigation schedule and water demand. The future phases of the project will be sized to satisfy EWMP project criteria. The piping system constructed during this Project will be sized to the 85th percentile, 24-hour storm event or opportunities to expand will be integrated. 4.1.1 Cost Estimate The Class D cost estimate presented in Table 4-1 was developed using various sources of information as well as the cost estimator’s best judgment.

Table 4-1 Preliminary Class D Cost Estimate for Alternative #1

Item Description Quantity Cost* Construction Mobilization (10%) LS $82,000 Excavation 6,100 CY $37,000 Soil Export 600 CY $47,000 Diversion Structure LS $15,000 Storm Drain Pipe 250 LF $50,000 Pre-Treatment System LS $110,000 Storage System 103,000 GAL $232,000 Ultraviolet Treatment System 2 EA $222,000 Non-Potable Water Line 250 LF $8,000 Pump System LS $70,000 Field Restoration 14,300 SF $4,000 Irrigation System 18,300 SF $18,300

Subtotal: $895,300 Contingency (25%) LS $224,000

Total: $1,119,300

- 21 -


4.2 Water Quality Improvement Alternative #2 Alternative #2 for the project involves the use of WaterSilos. WaterSilos are vertical hollow shafts designed to receive and store runoff in the form of vertical cisterns. A schematic drawing of the Project is provided in Figure 4-2. The Project will divert flows from Project No. 578 at the existing manhole near the 5th Street and Hollister intersection. As with the previous alternative, the diversion line will be sized to convey the 85th percentile, 24-hour storm peak flow.

Figure 4-2 Schematic Layout of Project Alternative #2

The system, similar to Alternative #1, will utilize a pre-treatment device, provide storage, and include a ultra-violet treatment system. Following secondary treatment, the water will be used for non-potable uses, including toilet flushing in the park restrooms and park irrigation. The system for this alternative was evaluated in the same manner as the previous alternative, with a fixed construction cost of $1.1 million (construction plus contingency). For alternative #2, the system will supplement irrigation to 21 percent of the park based on the 2013 irrigation schedule and water demand. The future phases of the project will be sized to satisfy EWMP project criteria. The piping system constructed during this Project will be sized to the 85th percentile, 24-hour storm event or opportunities to expand will be integrated.

- 22 -


4.2.1 Cost Estimate The Class D cost estimate presented in Table 4-2 was developed using various sources of information as well as the cost estimator’s best judgment.

Table 4-2 Preliminary Class D Cost Estimate for Alternative #2

Item Description Quantity Cost* Construction Mobilization (10%) LS $80,000 Soil Export 500 CY $39,000 Diversion Structure LS $15,000 Storm Drain Pipe 300 LF $60,000 Pre-Treatment System LS $110,000 Storage System including Excavation 85,000 GAL $255,000 Ultraviolet Treatment System 2 EA $222,000 Non-Potable Water Line 250 LF $8,000 Pump System LS $70,000 Field Restoration 600 SF $1,000 Irrigation System 16,000 SF $16,000

Subtotal: $876,000 Contingency (25%) LS $219,000

Total: $1,095,000 4.3 Risk Assessment It is important to identify the risks associated with a project so that they can be managed proactively. Effectively managing risk will allow the project to be completed on time and within the budget. There is risk associated with both of the alternatives presented above in the form of general risks, which apply to both concepts, and concept specific risks. Table 4-3 highlights the general and concept specific risks.

Table 4-3 Project Risk Assessment Summary

Risk Scenario Assessment

General Risks

Minimal rain may occur Drought conditions may continue and minimal water will be collected for reuse

Alternative #1 Risks

Large volumes of soil to stockpile Residents may complain about aesthetics Increased exposure to weather thereby increasing potential

turbidity

Storage system is very deep Confined space entry required for maintenance purposes

Alternative #2 Risks

New project concept Unknown construction complications Unknown maintenance cost

- 23 -


Table 4-3 Project Risk Assessment Summary

Storage system is very deep

Higher costs for confined space entry required for depths of possibly up to 70 feet

Will not be easy to identify when system needs maintenance due to fine sediment deposition

4.4 Alternative Comparison The two alternatives discussed in this section each utilize a different type of proprietary BMP component and would be used in the same way, to harvest, store, treat, and use dry- and wet-weather runoff from the Kenter Canyon subwatershed. Table 4-4 identifies the pros and cons associated with each of the concepts to aid in comparison.

Table 4-4 Pros and Cons for Project Alternatives Alternative #1 Alternative #2

Pros Shallower system Provides irrigation for 24 percent of the park Concept utilized in known successful projects Standard maintenance

Provides irrigation for 21 percent of the park Smaller construction footprint Smaller easement required

Cons Larger construction footprint Longer construction schedule Larger excavation footprint to avoid shoring Potential of wind and water erosion of

stockpiles, will require implementation of Best Management Practices

Deeper system, requires special machinery Specialized maintenance with unknown cost Difficult to remove after 50 years per

SMMUSD requirements Relatively new technology Unknown construction cost in California

Neutral Harvests, stores, treats, and uses runoff for non-potable uses Provides 100,000 gallons per year for toilet flushing Over 40 hauling trips required (54 and 43 for Alternatives #1 and 2 respectively)

4.5 Public Education and Outreach A public education and outreach program will be conducted prior to construction of the Project to inform the residents and community stakeholders (i.e., principals, students, teachers, and surrounding businesses) to aid the public in a positive perception of the Project. Three community stakeholder events will be conducted prior to construction and outreach will be incorporated into the parent teacher student association (PTSA) and pony league meetings. The goal of the outreach is to get the community to "buy-in" on the project and avoid potential detractors. The stakeholder events will be used to articulate the technical and policy aspects of the installation. The community-wide public education and outreach events will be developed, promoted, and hosted near the Project site. The Queue Theory provides the background on the outreach strategy that will be implemented. This theory states that satisfaction equals perception minus expectation. If a person expects a certain level of service and perceive the service reached to be higher, then they are satisfied. If a person perceives the same level of service, but had higher expectations then the person is disappointed and dissatisfied. Both perception and expectation are psychological phenomena that can be managed through an effective and thoughtful outreach strategy. The goal of the proposed outreach is to increase the perception that this project is preceding along well and manage expectations around what the project will really take.

- 24 -


The outreach information will be tailored to the audience by avoiding the use of jargon and describing how the project will affect the residents and their families while maintaining pride in the park. During outreach, feedback and comments will be solicited and it will be made clear what will be done in regards to their feedback so that thoughts are clear. The audience targeted during outreach includes the following:

Faculty, students, and parents of John Muir Elementary School; Faculty, students, and parents of SMASH; SMMUSD staff; Surrounding community and residents; and Various organizations and entities (Pony League, etc.).

To communicate effectively, mostly the logistics of the project (the "how") will be outlined and less focus will be given on the objectives (the "what"). The tone used will be helpful, accessible (avoid jargon), transparent, and progressive. Two primary user experiences have been identified and will be used to communicate with the target audience. These two primary user experiences are as follows:

1. Utilitarian (how will this affect my school, my neighborhood, my commute?) Most audiences will be mostly interested in the details of dates and closures so they will not be inconvenienced. For the potential detractors, it is recommended that clear expectations are set about what will change during construction. This should be done conservatively so that their perception and reality is consistent and not as inconvenient as they expected.

2. Identify (pride of place, Santa Monicans as environmental champions) Many Santa Monicans have a strong sense of pride living in a progressive city. The communication strategy being used will frame the project as another feat that environmental champion Santa Monica has managed and enforce the idea that the city is leading the way in building sustainable communities. This strategy will help establish a social norm around supporting this project for its environmental benefits despite some personal inconveniences it may involve, as in "it is for the greater good and a matter of the city's and residents' pride."

The main message to be conveyed through the outreach is that this project will help create a better and more sustainable Santa Monica. The project will be summed up as a project that involves intercepting stormwater going through a pipe under the park and treating it so the water can be recycled for park use (irrigation and toilet flushing). The outreach will emphasize that the project will reduce the amount of polluted stormwater going into the ocean, reduce potable water use through recycling, and protect the city's water supply amid a historic drought by using alternative sources (i.e., treating up to 100,000 gallons of stormwater). The outreach program will provide the logistics of the project, including design and construction schedule and dates. Additionally, frequently asked questions regarding the logistics will be addressed, such as will the park be closed and for how long and how will this affect the schools and residents nearby concerning dust, noise, safety, road blocks, etc. Once the Project is constructed, public outreach and education will be provided through the use of educational signage within the park. The signage will depict unique project features and convey messages about water quality and water conservation to school children, parents, teachers, and park users. In addition to the public outreach discussed above, outreach will be conducted with the City and SMMUSD maintenance staff using similar techniques. During this outreach, feedback will be solicited from the City and SMMUSD staff to identify preferred and feasible operations and maintenance practices.

- 25 -


Educational materials will also be distributed during this outreach and questions will be addressed. Two maintenance stakeholder meetings will be held during the design phase and will be in a similar format as the public outreach events except they will put more of an emphasis on the maintenance surrounding the project rather than the public perception.

- 26 -


5. Approvals and Anticipated Requirements Coordination with various agencies will be required throughout the Project's design phase to ensure all proper permits are obtained and all requirements are satisfied. Collaboration will be required with Division of State Architects (DSA), California Coastal Commission, Los Angeles County Department of Public Health (LACDPH), LACFCD, SMMUSD, and City of Santa Monica. This section discusses the requirements and approvals associated with the project and each of the collaborating agencies. A list of important contacts and their roles in the project is provided in Appendix E. 5.1 Division of State Architects Los Amigos Park is part of John Muir Elementary School; therefore the project will require approval by the DSA. DSA reviews construction projects under its jurisdiction, which includes K-12 public schools and community colleges, for Title 24 compliance. Plan reviews and construction oversight by DSA mostly concern structural safety governed by the Field Act contained in the California Education Code section 17280 for K-12 public schools. Various plans associated with DSA approval are provided in Appendix F. The Project will require an access, fire safety, and structural review. DSA approval process requires the following items to be submitted:

Required forms/documents; Plan review fees; Construction plans and specifications; Structural calculations; Geotechnical investigations; and Energy compliance documentation.

In addition to approval prior to construction, a DSA-certified inspector must also oversee construction. The inspector must be at the job site full time and an on-site office must be provided by the contractor. It is anticipated that DSA approval process will take the longest, as the water quality improvement system for this project is not usually incorporated within schools. The approval process includes an approximate plan review time of at least 90 days and the response preparation time varies based on the project schedule, while back check submittals generally take two days. Submittals must be in accordance with all requirements identified on their checklist and provided in Appendix F so that the approval process is completed in a timely manner. A meeting was conducted with DSA on October 13, 2014 to make sure all involved parties were thinking the same way and to ensure the expectations concerning DSA approval process were accurate. The meeting summary can be found in Appendix G. 5.2 California Coastal Commission The California Coastal Commission was established by voter initiative in 1972 (Proposition 20) and was later made permanent by the Legislature through adoption of the California Coastal Act of 1976. The Coastal Commission partners with local coastal cities and counties to plan and regulate the use of land and water in the coastal zone. Development activities, which are broadly defined by the Coastal Act require a coastal permit from either the Coastal Commission or the local government acting on behalf of the Coastal Commission. Development within the coastal zone may not commence until a coastal development permit has been issued by either the Coastal Commission or a local government that has a Commission-certified local coastal program (LCP). After certification of LCP, which include land use plans (LUPs), coastal development permit authority is delegated to the appropriate local government, but the Coastal Commission retains original permit jurisdiction over certain specified lands (such as tidelands and public trust lands) (State of California, 2012). The permit application and fee schedule are provided in Appendix H. A meeting was conducted with the California Coastal Commission on October 6, 2014 and it was determined that a de minimus coastal commission permit would be required for the project.

- 27 -


5.3 Los Angeles County Health Department The project will collect urban runoff and flows produced by rain events for reuse within the park irrigation system and for toilet flushing. LACDPH has developed guidelines for safe reuse of non-potable water supplies for irrigation uses to ensure the public health is not at risk. 5.3.1 Irrigation Reuse Based on the Guidelines for Harvesting Rainwater, Stormwater, & Urban Runoff for Outdoor Non-Potable Uses (2011), the project would be classified as a Tier III project. Tier III projects involve "on-site or off-site collection of rainwater, stormwater, and urban runoff in cisterns for on-site or off-site uses". The following preliminary requirements are identified in the Guidelines for Pipeline Construction and Installation - for the Safe Use of Recycled/Reclaimed Wastewater (LACDPH, 2009a):

Plans and specifications must be reviewed and approved prior to construction; LACDPH must inspect the proposed system prior to commencing construction; Plan check and preliminary inspection must be conducted prior to pipe installation; No excavation or open trench may be backfilled without first securing approval; and Final cross-connection testing must be conducted.

Plans will be checked to confirm an approved disinfection method is being used, proper pipe materials and identification is included, proper signs are called for, and cross-connections are not occurring. The requirements associated with reusing stormwater and urban runoff for irrigation are provided in Appendix I. 5.3.2 Toilet Flushing Reuse LACDPH has not yet published requirements associated with the reuse of stormwater and urban runoff for toilet flushing, but approval from both LACDPH and City of Santa Monica Planning & Community Development Department Building and Safety Division is required prior to construction. Chapter 16 of the 2013 California Plumbing Code includes a section pertaining to "On-Site Treated Nonpotable Gray Water Systems" (Section 1604). This section outlines the treatment, connection, signage, and inspection/testing requirements associated with the reuse of stormwater and urban runoff for toilet flushing. Based on communications with LACDPH, Title 22 water quality standards are applicable to this type of reuse. Coordination with LACDPH and the City of Santa Monica Planning & Community Department Building and Safety Division will be required throughout the design process to ensure all requirements are met. Prior to construction, plans will need to be reviewed and approved. Additionally, inspections and testing will need to be conducted. 5.4 Los Angeles County Flood Control District The Project will divert flows from LACFCD Bond Issue Project No. 578 to the harvest and reuse system within Los Amigos Park. A connection permit will be required prior to construction that will allow the City to connect to the existing LACFCD facilities. The following items must be submitted prior to receiving the connection permit:

Permit application; Plan checking and inspection fees; Four copies of the LACFCD as-built plans with the sketch of the connection location for the

proposed connection; Two copies of the LACFCD right-of-way map; Four copies of final construction plans;

- 28 -


LACFCD existing hydrology and hydraulic data for the facility; Two sets of signed and stamped hydrology calculations; and Two sets of signed and stamped hydraulic calculations.

Documents outlining the guidelines associated with obtaining the LACFCD connection permit are provided in Appendix J. 5.5 Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District As previously discussed, the Project is located within John Muir Elementary School, thus communication and coordination with the SMMUSD is required and essential to completing the project on time. It is anticipated that coordination with the SMMUSD administrators, through the City, will be required to gain access to the site for preliminary engineering work, including geotechnical and site assessments. It is also preferred that construction activities occur when the school is on summer break to minimize disruptions and nuisances. SMMUSD, per the lease agreement, requires that all equipment be removed 50 years after construction. 5.6 Additional Requirements In addition to the permits and approvals discussed above, the Project must be covered under applicable City of Santa Monica permits. A Building and Construction Permit and an Excavation Permit will be required prior to constructing the Project. A Building and Construction Permit must be obtained if a project includes construction improvement, repair, alterations, construction, or demolition, while an Excavation Permit is required if project includes the installation, repair, or removal of any facility in the public right-of-way. The Project involves construction and alterations, and will also be altering utilities within the public right-of-way, thus making these permits a requirement. Documents pertaining to these permits are provided in Appendix K.

- 29 -


6. References California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Los Angeles Region. 2012. Waste Discharge Requirements for Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System (MS4) Discharges Within the Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles County, Except Those Discharges Originating from the City of Long Beach, NPDES Permit No. CAS004001, Order No. R4-2012-0175. City of Santa Monica. 2014. Phase I Environmental Assessment, Los Amigos Park, 2526 6th Street, Santa Monica, California. Prepared by SCS Engineers County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Health (LACDPH). September 2009 (2009a). Guidelines for Pipeline Construction and Installation for the Safe Use or Recycled/Reclaimed Wastewater. County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Health (LACDPH). September 2009 (2009b). Requirements for the Installation and Pipeline Construction for Safe Reuse of Rainfall/Run-Off, Non-Potable Cistern Water and Urban Run-Off Water. County of Los Angeles, Department of Public Health (LACDPH). September 2011. Guidelines for Harvesting Rainwater, Stormwater, & Urban Runoff for Outdoor Non-Potable Uses. Division of the State Architect. 2014. Department of General Services. http://www.dgs.ca.gov/dsa/Home.aspx. International Association of Plumbing and Mechanical Officials. 2013. California Plumbing Code, Chapter 16, Section 1604. Geotechnologies, Inc. Geotechnical Engineering Investigation Proposed Streetscape Improvements to Ocean Park Boulevard Between Lincoln Boulevard and Neilson Way Santa Monica, California. Prepared for Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW). February 2004. Analysis of 85th Percentile 24-hour Rainfall Depth Analysis Within the County of Los Angeles. Water Resources Division, Hydrology Section. Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW). February 2005. Storm Drain Plans M.T.D. No. 1729: City of Santa Monica Civic Center Storm Drain. Prepared by RBF Consulting. Drawing Number PF527370. Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW). January 2006. Hydrology Manual. Los Angeles County Department of Public Works (LACDPW). January 2007. Los Angeles County Flood Control District Guidelines for Connection Permits. Construction Division - Permits and Subdivisions Section. Los Angeles County GIS Data Portal. 2013. http://egis3.lacounty.gov/dataportal. Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD). 1958. County Storm Drain Bond Issue: Project No. 249 Unit 2. Prepared by City of Santa Monica, Department of Engineering. Drawing Number PD027398. Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD). 1966. Project No. 578: Santa Monica "Line J". Prepared by City of Santa Monica, Department of Engineering. Drawing Number PD032185.

- 30 -

http://www.dgs.ca.gov/dsa/Home.aspx

http://egis3.lacounty.gov/dataportal


Los Angeles Regional Water Quality Control Board (LARWQCB). Adopted June 13, 1994. Water Quality Control Plan Los Angeles Region. Basin Plan for the Coastal Watersheds of Los Angeles and Ventura Counties. SEITec, a California Corporation. October 2014. Examination of the WaterSilos System for the Los Amigos Park Stormwater Harvest and Direct Use Demonstration Project. Prepared for the City of Santa Monica. Revision 1. State of California, California Coastal Commission. Copyright 2012. Program Overview. http://www.coastal.ca.gov/cdp/cdp-forms.html. The J. Bryer Group, Inc. July 15, 2002. Geotechnical Engineering Exploration Santa Monica Parks Building Replacement Project- Phase I Proposed New Buildings Los Amigos Park. Prepared for the City of Santa Monica. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Last updated March 2012. Water: Total Maximum Daily Loads (303d). What is a 303(d) List of Impaired Waters? http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/cwa/tmdl/overview.cfm. United States Geological Survey (USGS). Last updated January 2014. Maps, Imagery, and Publications. http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/. Downloaded June 24, 2014.

- 31 -

http://www.coastal.ca.gov/cdp/cdp-forms.html

http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/lawsguidance/cwa/tmdl/overview.cfm

http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod/

Appendix A

Hydrologic Calculations using the Time of Concentration Calculator

Appendix B

Existing LACDPW Hydrology/Hydraulic Calculations

and WSPG Hydraulic Model Results

Appendix C

WSPG Hydraulic Model Output

FILE: Pro57810A.WSW W S P G W - CIVILDESIGN Version 14.06 PAGE 1 Program Package Serial Number: 3069 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date:10-30-2014 Time: 5: 7: 5 City of Santa Monica Los Amigos Park - Water Harvest and Direct Use LACFCD Proj 249, Unit 2 (Partial) & Proj 578, Line J - 10 yr Return Fr ************************************************************************************************************************** ******** | Invert | Depth | Water | Q | Vel Vel | Energy | Super |Critical|Flow Top|Height/|Base Wt| |No Wth Station | Elev | (FT) | Elev | (CFS) | (FPS) Head | Grd.El.| Elev | Depth | Width |Dia.-FT|or I.D.| ZL |Prs/Pip -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -| L/Elem |Ch Slope | | | | SF Ave| HF |SE Dpth|Froude N|Norm Dp | "N" | X-Fall| ZR |Type Ch *********|*********|********|*********|*********|*******|*******|*********|*******|********|********|*******|*******|***** |******* | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2050.000 51.750 4.000 55.750 80.41 6.40 .64 56.39 .00 2.72 .00 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .000 .0067 .0031 .00 4.00 .00 2.43 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2050.000 51.750 4.000 55.750 80.41 6.40 .64 56.39 .00 2.72 .00 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 82.000 .0067 .0029 .24 4.00 .00 2.43 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2132.000 52.295 3.629 55.925 80.41 6.71 .70 56.62 .00 2.72 2.32 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 38.118 .0067 .0028 .11 3.63 .52 2.43 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2170.118 52.549 3.414 55.963 80.41 7.04 .77 56.73 .00 2.72 2.83 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 28.150 .0067 .0031 .09 3.41 .62 2.43 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2198.268 52.736 3.236 55.972 80.41 7.38 .85 56.82 .00 2.72 3.14 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 21.662 .0067 .0034 .07 3.24 .70 2.43 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2219.929 52.880 3.081 55.961 80.41 7.74 .93 56.89 .00 2.72 3.37 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 9.847 .0067 .0037 .04 3.08 .78 2.43 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2229.776 52.946 3.002 55.948 80.41 7.95 .98 56.93 .00 2.72 3.46 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- HYDRAULIC JUMP | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2229.776 52.946 2.459 55.405 80.41 9.92 1.53 56.93 .00 2.72 3.89 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 35.224 .0067 .0064 .23 2.46 1.21 2.43 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2265.000 53.180 2.459 55.639 80.41 9.92 1.53 57.17 .00 2.72 3.89 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0066 .02 2.46 1.21 .013 .00 .00 PIPE

FILE: Pro57810A.WSW W S P G W - CIVILDESIGN Version 14.06 PAGE 2 Program Package Serial Number: 3069 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date:10-30-2014 Time: 5: 7: 5 City of Santa Monica Los Amigos Park - Water Harvest and Direct Use LACFCD Proj 249, Unit 2 (Partial) & Proj 578, Line J - 10 yr Return Fr ************************************************************************************************************************** ******** | Invert | Depth | Water | Q | Vel Vel | Energy | Super |Critical|Flow Top|Height/|Base Wt| |No Wth Station | Elev | (FT) | Elev | (CFS) | (FPS) Head | Grd.El.| Elev | Depth | Width |Dia.-FT|or I.D.| ZL |Prs/Pip -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -| L/Elem |Ch Slope | | | | SF Ave| HF |SE Dpth|Froude N|Norm Dp | "N" | X-Fall| ZR |Type Ch *********|*********|********|*********|*********|*******|*******|*********|*******|********|********|*******|*******|***** |******* | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2267.500 53.180 2.427 55.607 80.41 10.08 1.58 57.18 .00 2.72 3.91 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 5.500 .0109 .0065 .04 2.43 1.24 2.08 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2273.000 53.240 2.476 55.716 80.41 9.84 1.50 57.22 .00 2.72 3.88 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0065 .02 2.48 1.20 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2275.500 53.240 2.442 55.682 80.41 10.01 1.55 57.24 .00 2.72 3.90 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 16.500 .0073 .0065 .11 2.44 1.23 2.36 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2292.000 53.360 2.470 55.830 80.41 9.87 1.51 57.34 .00 2.72 3.89 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0065 .02 2.47 1.20 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2294.500 53.360 2.436 55.796 80.41 10.03 1.56 57.36 .00 2.72 3.90 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 30.500 .0072 .0064 .20 2.44 1.23 2.37 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2325.000 53.580 2.487 56.067 80.41 9.79 1.49 57.56 .00 2.72 3.88 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0064 .02 2.49 1.19 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2327.500 53.580 2.451 56.031 80.41 9.96 1.54 57.57 .00 2.72 3.90 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 14.500 .0083 .0062 .09 2.45 1.22 2.27 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2342.000 53.700 2.524 56.224 80.41 9.63 1.44 57.66 .00 2.72 3.86 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0061 .02 2.52 1.15 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2344.500 53.700 2.482 56.182 80.41 9.81 1.50 57.68 .00 2.72 3.88 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 10.200 .0078 .0061 .06 2.48 1.19 2.31 .013 .00 .00 PIPE

FILE: Pro57810A.WSW W S P G W - CIVILDESIGN Version 14.06 PAGE 3 Program Package Serial Number: 3069 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date:10-30-2014 Time: 5: 7: 5 City of Santa Monica Los Amigos Park - Water Harvest and Direct Use LACFCD Proj 249, Unit 2 (Partial) & Proj 578, Line J - 10 yr Return Fr ************************************************************************************************************************** ******** | Invert | Depth | Water | Q | Vel Vel | Energy | Super |Critical|Flow Top|Height/|Base Wt| |No Wth Station | Elev | (FT) | Elev | (CFS) | (FPS) Head | Grd.El.| Elev | Depth | Width |Dia.-FT|or I.D.| ZL |Prs/Pip -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -| L/Elem |Ch Slope | | | | SF Ave| HF |SE Dpth|Froude N|Norm Dp | "N" | X-Fall| ZR |Type Ch *********|*********|********|*********|*********|*******|*******|*********|*******|********|********|*******|*******|***** |******* | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2354.700 53.780 2.531 56.311 80.41 9.59 1.43 57.74 .00 2.72 3.86 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 273.831 .0059 .0059 1.62 2.53 1.15 2.53 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2628.531 55.401 2.531 57.932 80.41 9.59 1.43 59.36 .00 2.72 3.86 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 89.469 .0059 .0059 .53 2.53 1.15 2.53 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2718.000 55.930 2.542 58.472 80.41 9.54 1.41 59.89 .00 2.72 3.85 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0060 .01 2.54 1.14 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2720.500 55.930 2.498 58.428 80.41 9.74 1.47 59.90 .00 2.72 3.87 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 18.500 .0070 .0059 .11 2.50 1.18 2.39 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2739.000 56.060 2.561 58.621 80.41 9.46 1.39 60.01 .00 2.72 3.84 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0059 .01 2.56 1.12 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2741.500 56.060 2.512 58.572 80.40 9.68 1.45 60.03 .00 2.72 3.87 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 19.500 .0067 .0059 .11 2.51 1.16 2.43 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2761.000 56.190 2.563 58.753 80.40 9.45 1.39 60.14 .00 2.72 3.84 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0059 .01 2.56 1.12 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2763.500 56.190 2.514 58.704 80.40 9.67 1.45 60.16 .00 2.72 3.87 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 47.500 .0061 .0060 .28 2.51 1.16 2.50 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2811.000 56.480 2.534 59.014 80.40 9.58 1.42 60.44 .00 2.72 3.85 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0061 .02 2.53 1.14 .013 .00 .00 PIPE

FILE: Pro57810A.WSW W S P G W - CIVILDESIGN Version 14.06 PAGE 4 Program Package Serial Number: 3069 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date:10-30-2014 Time: 5: 7: 5 City of Santa Monica Los Amigos Park - Water Harvest and Direct Use LACFCD Proj 249, Unit 2 (Partial) & Proj 578, Line J - 10 yr Return Fr ************************************************************************************************************************** ******** | Invert | Depth | Water | Q | Vel Vel | Energy | Super |Critical|Flow Top|Height/|Base Wt| |No Wth Station | Elev | (FT) | Elev | (CFS) | (FPS) Head | Grd.El.| Elev | Depth | Width |Dia.-FT|or I.D.| ZL |Prs/Pip -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -| L/Elem |Ch Slope | | | | SF Ave| HF |SE Dpth|Froude N|Norm Dp | "N" | X-Fall| ZR |Type Ch *********|*********|********|*********|*********|*******|*******|*********|*******|********|********|*******|*******|***** |******* | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2813.500 56.480 2.491 58.971 80.40 9.77 1.48 60.45 .00 2.72 3.88 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 5.500 .0091 .0060 .03 2.49 1.18 2.20 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2819.000 56.530 2.539 59.069 80.40 9.56 1.42 60.49 .00 2.72 3.85 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0060 .02 2.54 1.14 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2821.500 56.530 2.495 59.025 80.40 9.75 1.48 60.50 .00 2.72 3.88 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 6.000 .0083 .0060 .04 2.50 1.18 2.26 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2827.500 56.580 2.535 59.115 80.40 9.58 1.42 60.54 .00 2.72 3.85 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 2.500 .0080 .0058 .01 2.53 1.14 2.29 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2830.000 56.600 2.553 59.153 80.40 9.49 1.40 60.55 .00 2.72 3.84 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0059 .01 2.55 1.13 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2832.500 56.600 2.506 59.106 80.40 9.70 1.46 60.57 .00 2.72 3.87 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 1.845 .0200 .0058 .01 2.51 1.17 1.75 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2834.345 56.637 2.603 59.240 80.40 9.29 1.34 60.58 .00 2.72 3.81 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- .655 .0200 .0052 .00 2.60 1.09 1.75 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2835.000 56.650 2.716 59.366 80.40 8.85 1.22 60.58 .00 2.72 3.73 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 3.195 .0015 .0046 .01 2.72 1.00 4.00 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2838.195 56.655 2.836 59.491 80.40 8.44 1.11 60.60 .00 2.72 3.63 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 9.805 .0015 .0041 .04 2.84 .92 4.00 .013 .00 .00 PIPE

FILE: Pro57810A.WSW W S P G W - CIVILDESIGN Version 14.06 PAGE 5 Program Package Serial Number: 3069 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date:10-30-2014 Time: 5: 7: 5 City of Santa Monica Los Amigos Park - Water Harvest and Direct Use LACFCD Proj 249, Unit 2 (Partial) & Proj 578, Line J - 10 yr Return Fr ************************************************************************************************************************** ******** | Invert | Depth | Water | Q | Vel Vel | Energy | Super |Critical|Flow Top|Height/|Base Wt| |No Wth Station | Elev | (FT) | Elev | (CFS) | (FPS) Head | Grd.El.| Elev | Depth | Width |Dia.-FT|or I.D.| ZL |Prs/Pip -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -| L/Elem |Ch Slope | | | | SF Ave| HF |SE Dpth|Froude N|Norm Dp | "N" | X-Fall| ZR |Type Ch *********|*********|********|*********|*********|*******|*******|*********|*******|********|********|*******|*******|***** |******* | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2848.000 56.670 2.951 59.621 80.40 8.09 1.02 60.64 .00 2.72 3.52 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0039 .01 2.95 .85 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2850.500 56.670 2.984 59.654 80.40 8.00 .99 60.65 .00 2.72 3.48 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 23.279 .0013 .0036 .08 2.98 .83 4.00 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2873.779 56.700 3.128 59.828 80.40 7.63 .90 60.73 .00 2.72 3.30 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 40.289 .0013 .0033 .13 3.13 .75 4.00 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2914.068 56.752 3.290 60.042 80.40 7.27 .82 60.86 .00 2.72 3.06 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 66.563 .0013 .0030 .20 3.29 .67 4.00 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 2980.630 56.839 3.477 60.316 80.40 6.93 .75 61.06 .00 2.72 2.70 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 112.685 .0013 .0028 .31 3.48 .59 4.00 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3093.316 56.985 3.713 60.698 80.40 6.61 .68 61.38 .00 2.72 2.07 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 65.584 .0013 .0027 .18 3.71 .48 4.00 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3158.900 57.070 3.830 60.900 80.40 6.49 .65 61.55 .00 2.72 1.62 4.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0031 .01 3.83 .41 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3161.400 57.070 3.977 61.047 72.00 6.52 .66 61.71 .00 2.61 .00 3.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 58.600 .0014 .0035 .21 3.98 .00 3.75 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3220.000 57.150 4.105 61.255 72.00 6.52 .66 61.91 .00 2.61 .00 3.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0032 .01 4.10 .00 .013 .00 .00 PIPE

FILE: Pro57810A.WSW W S P G W - CIVILDESIGN Version 14.06 PAGE 6 Program Package Serial Number: 3069 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date:10-30-2014 Time: 5: 7: 5 City of Santa Monica Los Amigos Park - Water Harvest and Direct Use LACFCD Proj 249, Unit 2 (Partial) & Proj 578, Line J - 10 yr Return Fr ************************************************************************************************************************** ******** | Invert | Depth | Water | Q | Vel Vel | Energy | Super |Critical|Flow Top|Height/|Base Wt| |No Wth Station | Elev | (FT) | Elev | (CFS) | (FPS) Head | Grd.El.| Elev | Depth | Width |Dia.-FT|or I.D.| ZL |Prs/Pip -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -| L/Elem |Ch Slope | | | | SF Ave| HF |SE Dpth|Froude N|Norm Dp | "N" | X-Fall| ZR |Type Ch *********|*********|********|*********|*********|*******|*******|*********|*******|********|********|*******|*******|***** |******* | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3222.500 57.150 4.374 61.524 63.60 5.76 .51 62.04 .00 2.45 .00 3.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 2.500 .0040 .0028 .01 4.37 .00 2.61 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3225.000 57.160 4.371 61.531 63.60 5.76 .51 62.05 .00 2.45 .00 3.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0024 .01 4.37 .00 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3227.510 57.160 4.602 61.762 55.20 5.00 .39 62.15 .00 2.28 .00 3.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 425.690 .0013 .0021 .89 4.60 .00 3.75 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 3653.200 57.710 4.958 62.668 55.20 5.00 .39 63.06 .00 2.28 .00 3.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 374.470 .0013 .0021 .78 4.96 .00 3.75 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4027.670 58.210 5.238 63.448 55.20 5.00 .39 63.84 .00 2.28 .00 3.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 56.000 .0012 .0021 .12 .00 .00 3.75 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4083.670 58.280 5.334 63.614 55.20 5.00 .39 64.00 .00 2.28 .00 3.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 7.030 .0014 .0021 .01 5.33 .00 3.75 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4090.700 58.290 5.338 63.628 55.20 5.00 .39 64.02 .00 2.28 .00 3.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0032 .01 5.34 .00 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4094.130 58.290 5.365 63.655 35.10 5.91 .54 64.20 .00 1.97 .00 2.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 6.020 .0017 .0044 .03 5.36 .00 2.75 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4100.150 58.300 5.381 63.681 35.10 5.91 .54 64.22 .00 1.97 .00 2.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 9.910 .0020 .0044 .04 5.38 .00 2.75 .013 .00 .00 PIPE

FILE: Pro57810A.WSW W S P G W - CIVILDESIGN Version 14.06 PAGE 7 Program Package Serial Number: 3069 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date:10-30-2014 Time: 5: 7: 5 City of Santa Monica Los Amigos Park - Water Harvest and Direct Use LACFCD Proj 249, Unit 2 (Partial) & Proj 578, Line J - 10 yr Return Fr ************************************************************************************************************************** ******** | Invert | Depth | Water | Q | Vel Vel | Energy | Super |Critical|Flow Top|Height/|Base Wt| |No Wth Station | Elev | (FT) | Elev | (CFS) | (FPS) Head | Grd.El.| Elev | Depth | Width |Dia.-FT|or I.D.| ZL |Prs/Pip -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -| L/Elem |Ch Slope | | | | SF Ave| HF |SE Dpth|Froude N|Norm Dp | "N" | X-Fall| ZR |Type Ch *********|*********|********|*********|*********|*******|*******|*********|*******|********|********|*******|*******|***** |******* | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4110.060 58.320 5.405 63.725 35.10 5.91 .54 64.27 .00 1.97 .00 2.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 56.090 .0020 .0044 .25 .00 .00 2.75 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4166.150 58.430 5.610 64.040 35.10 5.91 .54 64.58 .00 1.97 .00 2.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 9.550 .0021 .0044 .04 5.61 .00 2.75 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4175.700 58.450 5.660 64.110 35.10 5.91 .54 64.65 .00 1.97 .00 2.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0036 .01 5.66 .00 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4178.200 58.450 5.980 64.430 28.30 4.76 .35 64.78 .00 1.77 .00 2.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 11.800 .0025 .0029 .03 5.98 .00 2.45 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4190.000 58.480 5.984 64.464 28.30 4.76 .35 64.82 .00 1.77 .00 2.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0023 .01 5.98 .00 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4192.500 58.480 6.291 64.771 21.40 3.60 .20 64.97 .00 1.53 .00 2.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 453.500 .0022 .0016 .74 6.29 .00 1.97 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4646.000 59.480 6.034 65.514 21.40 3.60 .20 65.72 .00 1.53 .00 2.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0013 .00 6.03 .00 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4648.500 59.480 6.198 65.678 15.70 2.64 .11 65.79 .00 1.30 .00 2.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 5.500 .0036 .0009 .00 6.20 .00 1.36 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4654.000 59.500 6.188 65.688 15.70 2.64 .11 65.80 .00 1.30 .00 2.750 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- JUNCT STR .0000 .0014 .00 6.19 .00 .013 .00 .00 PIPE

FILE: Pro57810A.WSW W S P G W - CIVILDESIGN Version 14.06 PAGE 8 Program Package Serial Number: 3069 WATER SURFACE PROFILE LISTING Date:10-30-2014 Time: 5: 7: 5 City of Santa Monica Los Amigos Park - Water Harvest and Direct Use LACFCD Proj 249, Unit 2 (Partial) & Proj 578, Line J - 10 yr Return Fr ************************************************************************************************************************** ******** | Invert | Depth | Water | Q | Vel Vel | Energy | Super |Critical|Flow Top|Height/|Base Wt| |No Wth Station | Elev | (FT) | Elev | (CFS) | (FPS) Head | Grd.El.| Elev | Depth | Width |Dia.-FT|or I.D.| ZL |Prs/Pip -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -| L/Elem |Ch Slope | | | | SF Ave| HF |SE Dpth|Froude N|Norm Dp | "N" | X-Fall| ZR |Type Ch *********|*********|********|*********|*********|*******|*******|*********|*******|********|********|*******|*******|***** |******* | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4656.500 59.500 6.219 65.719 9.70 3.09 .15 65.87 .00 1.11 .00 2.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 5.070 .0217 .0018 .01 6.22 .00 .74 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4661.570 59.610 6.118 65.728 9.70 3.09 .15 65.88 .00 1.11 .00 2.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 35.330 .0142 .0018 .06 .00 .00 .83 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4696.900 60.110 5.713 65.823 9.70 3.09 .15 65.97 .00 1.11 .00 2.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |- 8.100 .0136 .0018 .01 5.71 .00 .84 .013 .00 .00 PIPE | | | | | | | | | | | | | 4705.000 60.220 5.617 65.837 9.70 3.09 .15 65.99 .00 1.11 .00 2.000 .000 .00 1 .0 -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- -|- |-

Appendix D

Water Quality Results from the Diversion Manhole

CWE 1561 E. ORANGETHORPE AVENUE SUITE 240 FULLERTON, CA 92831-5202 (714) 526-7500 PHONE (714) 526-7004 FAX www.cwecorp.com

“Engineering Solutions to Improve the Quality of Life.”

October 22, 2014 Rick Valte, PE Watershed Program Manager Civil Engineering Division 1437 4th Street, Suite 300 Santa Monica, CA 90401 5th Street Storm Drain Quantification Analysis Dear Mr. Valte, As requested, CWE has calculated the dry-weather runoff at the intersection of 5th Street and Hollister Avenue within the City of Santa Monica and has collected two water quality grab samples from the Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) storm drain, Project 578, built in the public Right-of-Way under 5th Street and connecting to the Pico-Kentor storm drain in Pico Boulevard. CWE installed a weir at the manhole location in the intersection described above in the 48-inch section of the main line. The weir was not attached to the storm drain pipe but was fixed in position by sandbags to restrict dry-weather flows that would go through a notch in the weir plate. Due to the nature of the flow in the pipe, the water levels did not reach the notch level and no valid measurements were taken. In a calibration effort, the flows were calculated using depth measurements when the pipe was free flowing and using the Manning's equation for flow in a closed conduit. The results of the Manning's flow calculations based on depth of flow in the pipe were between 1 to 3.5 gpm or approximately 0.02 to 0.07 gpm/acre for the 50.4 acre watershed tributary to the manhole as delineated by the LACFCD and verified by reviewing maps and field investigation. Two water quality grab samples were taken after the weir was installed and time lapsed to impound enough water to take samples. A dip pole was used to take samples without contaminating the environment in the storm drain. The results of the samples are provided in Table 1.

Table 1 5th Street Water Quality Results

Item Analyte Method 9/16/14 Results

9/25/14 Results Units

1 Total Nitrogen ALCH 4025 6.8 3.2 mg/L 2 Total Oil and Grease EPA 1664A 3 ND mg/L 3 Aluminum EPA 200.7 1.2 0.08 mg/L 4 Antimony EPA 200.7 ND ND mg/L 5 Arsenic EPA 200.7 ND ND mg/L 6 Beryllium EPA 200.7 ND ND mg/L 7 Cadmium EPA 200.7 ND ND mg/L

Mr. Rick Valte October 22, 2014 Page 2


Table 1 5th Street Water Quality Results

Item Analyte Method 9/16/14 Results

9/25/14 Results Units

8 Chromium EPA 200.7 0.004 ND mg/L 9 Copper EPA 200.7 0.026 0.644 mg/L 10 Iron EPA 200.7 1.83 0.440 mg/L 11 Lead EPA 200.7 0.025 0.025 mg/L 12 Nickel EPA 200.7 0.005 0.004 mg/L 13 Selenium EPA 200.7 ND ND mg/L 14 Silver EPA 200.7 ND ND mg/L 15 Thallium EPA 200.7 ND ND mg/L 16 Zinc EPA 200.7 0.385 0.058 mg/L 17 Hexavalent Chromium EPA 218.6 ND ND ug/L 18 Mercury EPA 245.1 0.07 ND ug/L 19 Nitrate, as Nitrogen EPA 300.0 0.21 ND mg/L 20 Nitrite, as Nitrogen EPA 300.0 0.22 ND mg/L 21 Ammonia, as Nitrogen EPA 350.1 2.30 0.50 mg/L 22 Total Kjeldahl Nitrogen EPA 351.2 6.32 3.20 mg/L 23 TPH (C6 to C10) EPA 8015B ND ND mg/L 24 TPH (C6 to C22) EPA 8015B 0.23 0.16 mg/L 25 TPH (C23 to C36) EPA 8015B 0.86 0.33 mg/L 26 SVOCs EPA 8270C ND ND ug/L 27 Total Hardness SM 2340-B 249 234 mg/L 28 Specific Conductance SM 2510-B 824 804 umhos/cm 29 TDS SM 2540-C 544 468 mg/L 30 TSS SM 2540-D 38 6 mg/L 31 Total Phosphorus, as P SM 4500-P-B-5-E 2.14 1.69 mg/L 32 Total Phosphorus, as PO4 SM 4500-P-B-5-E 6.58 5.17 mg/L 33 Ortho Phosphate, as P SM 4500-P-E 1.67 1.47 mg/L 34 Ortho Phosphate, as PO4 SM 4500-P-E 5.11 4.50 mg/L 35 BOD SM 5210-B 35 12 mg/L 36 COD SM 5220-D 197 166 mg/L 37 Total Coliform SM 9221-B 500,000 300,000 MPN/100ml 38 Fecal Coliform SM 9221-E 90,000 30,000 MPN/100ml 39 Enterococcus SM 9230-B 130,000 23,000 MPN/100ml 40 UV 254 Transmittance SM 5910B 1.28 1.23 cm-1

Mr. Rick Valte October 22, 2014 Page 3


If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact me at (714) 526-7500 Ext. 212 or [email protected]. Respectfully submitted, CWE Vik Bapna, PE, CPSWQ, QSD/P Principal

Appendix E

Contact List

Name Department/Division Phone Email Notes

Allan Sheth PW/Civil Engineering 310‐458‐8732 [email protected] Project ManagerDanita Smith PW/Civil Engineering 310‐458‐8721 [email protected] Project AssistantRick Valte PW/Civil Engineering 310‐458‐8234 [email protected] Project DirectorNeal Shapiro OES [email protected] MWD Grant Co‐ordinator & Project LiasonGary Welling PW/Water Resources [email protected] Water & Wastewater SuprintendentDanny Gomez PW/Water Resources [email protected] Gusman PW/Water Resources [email protected] Aldpavr PW/Facilities Management (310) 458‐2201 x2603 [email protected] Facilities SuperintendentDarrell Baker PW/Public Landscape (310) 458‐2201 x2772 [email protected] Public Landscape SuperintendentEric Johnson CCS [email protected] Gurgiolo PW/Public Landscape [email protected] Park Supervisor for LAPTroy PW/Public Landscape Park MaintenanceSam Bailey PW/Public Landscape Irrigation Tech.Kathy LePrevost CCS/Administration [email protected] Roach [email protected] Loggins‐Tazi patty.loggins‐[email protected] Yavari [email protected] Linley Public Relations? [email protected] Hossli Risk Management [email protected] Risk Manager / Insurance QuestionsEriko Matsumoto City Attorneys Office [email protected] Deputy City Attorney / Agreements & Easements

California Watershed Engineering (CWE) ‐ Engineering ConsultantVik Bapna CWE (714) 526‐7500 x212 [email protected] Project DirectorBill Young CWE (714) 526‐7500 x103 [email protected] Project ManagerGreg Abbasfard CWE (714) 526‐7500 [email protected] Marketing AssistantKatie Harrel CWE (714) 526‐7500 x205 [email protected] Staff Engineer

Namju Cho SGA (562) 597‐0205 Ncho@sga‐inc.net

Project Contact ListLos Amigos Park Stormwater Harvesting & Direct Use Demonstration Project

City of Santa Monica

Stephen Groner Associates (SGA) ‐ Public Outreach Consultant

Page 1 of 3



Terry Kamibayashi Facilities (310) 450‐8338 [email protected] Maint. & Operations ‐ Construction ManagerAna Flores Facilities ‐ Admin (310) 450‐8338 [email protected] Admin Asst. to TerryJessica Rishe SMASH/Principal Principal, SMASHJanice Wold SMASH/Office Manager Office Manager, SMASHTristan Komlos Joun Muir Elem./Principal Principal, John Muir ElementaryYolanda Sanchez Joun Muir Elem./Admin. Admin Asst., John Muir Elementary

Theresa Harris John Muir PTA/Co‐PresidentElisabeth Bourdeau John Muir PTA/Co‐President

SMASH PTSA

Douglas Humphrey DSA/Los Angeles Region Office (213) 897‐4092 douglas.humphrey@[email protected] LA Region Office ManagerCarlos Araujo DSA/Los Angeles Region Office (213) 897‐3303 [email protected] Supervising Architect, Project Services Sect.Frank Chia DSA/Los Angeles Region Office (213) 897‐0199 [email protected] Structural Reviewer?

Carlos Borja DPH/Dept. Public Health (323) 842‐9638 [email protected] Point of contact for DPH

Eden Berhan DPW/Dept. Public Works (626) 458‐4936 [email protected] Point of contact for LACDPW

Al Padilla Coastal Commission Analyst (562) 590‐5071 [email protected] Analyst / contact for Coastal Commission

Los Angeles County, Dept. of Public Works (DPW)

California Coastal Commission

Santa Monica Malibu Unified School District (SMMUSD)

PTA/PTSA

Division of State Architects (DSA)

Los Angeles County, Dept. of Public Health (DPH)

Page 2 of 3



Jim Lawson Ocean Park Association / OPA President, OPAJeff Jarow Ocean Park Association / OPA Community Liason, OPA

AYSOPony League

Neighborhood Associations

Recreational Organizations

Page 3 of 3

Appendix F

DSA References

(See procedure at http://www.documents.dgs.ca.gov/dsa/pubs/DSA_Rehab_Stakeholders.pdf

Procedure #07-01

123

Part 1 Required Forms/Documents for Project Submittal 1.01 , Application for Approval of Plans and Specifications

A , Identifying increments, if applicableB Design professionals identified on DSA-1 consistent with those represented in plans

1.02 DSA-3, Project Submittal Checklist 1.03 , Testings and Inspections List 1.04 Preliminary review meeting records, if applicable1.05 Access Compliance Hardship Request, if applicable1.06 DSA-approved Evaluation and Design Criteria Report for Rehabilitation of Existing

Pro

vide

d in

Pro

ject

Sub

mitt

al

Additions

Check applicable type.

Name of Project:

INSTRUCTIONS: At project submittal, all items relevant to the project scope(s), as indicated on this form by an "X" are required and any items indicated with an "O" are optional. "+" Indicates that items may be required, depending on various factors. All items included in this submittal must be checkmarked by the applicant in the last column on this form, and location noted in the last column. This form must be submitted with the required project documents and can be completed on-line, and submitted either in: 1) hardcopy with wet signature, or 2) electronically with digital signature. Additional information, documents or justifications may be required based on the individual project, including scope, site access, and district. For DSA to perform an efficient and comprehensive plan review and evaluate compliance with California statutes and regulations, plans must be complete, legible, sufficiently detailed and cross-referenced.

New Construction

Relocation

Non-Conforming Buildings for School Use

Form DSA-3 (Rev 03-14-14) Page 1 of 8

YES NO

District: Applicant:

SB 575, Ch. 725, Statutes of 2001

Project Scope

K-12 Built after 7/1/2002?

Community College

11

456

Alteration/ Modernization Rehabilitation Reconstruction

Check all that apply to submittal.

Is project located in a flood hazard area as defined by local jurisdiction flood hazard map? If YES, for Scopes 2, 4, 5, or 6 - Is value of project more than 50% pre-improvement market value of structure? YES NO

YES NO

DSA-1DSA-1.INC

DSA-103

Location/Drawing # (or N/A)

DSA-3.INSTR For detailed instructions on the completion of this form, see . For optimal performance, download the most current Acrobat Reader.

ACCESS ONLY

Rev 3/14

DSA-3FORM

Project Submittal Checklist

DSA File No.:*DSA Application No.:** (if previously assigned by DSA)

• Pre-Check (PC) projects (see DSA

A. Identification.

B. Facility. C. Project Scope.

D. Flood Design.

In addition to the requirements of DSA-3, provide one additional set of construction documents to DSA Headquarters for the following types of projects: NOTE:). In addition, any conditioned or unconditioned PC building requires a DSA energy review.

See http://www.dgs.ca.gov/dsa/Programs/progSustainability/energyregs.aspx for additional documentation requirements.• High Performance Incentive or Energy Efficiency grant applications (If line 16b is checked on the DSA-1 Application form).

1 2 3 4 5 6

Other (UC, CSU, ESB)

NOTE: This form is designed to provide a comprehensive guideline. For smaller projects, not all items indicated may be required. Check with DSA Regional Office.

DSA-810 on site plan, with LFA sign off for applicable projects. Required as of 1/1/13 (see )1.07 BU 12-02

If project is not located in a flood hazard area, see Part 3.03 V

Please Print or Type all Information - or you may fill out on-line and print for signatures ALL FIELDS MUST BE FILLED IN PER INSTRUCTIONS

Name 3. Dist. Superintendent:

Telephone Email

EmailTelephone

Name 4. Facilities Director

5. Construction of: (Names ofNew Buildings or improvements)

Buildings or improvements) 6. Addition to: (Names of

(Names of Buildings) 7. Relocation of:

8. General Alterations to:(Names of Buildings or improvemens)

(Names of Buildings) 9. Rehabilitation of: DSA Rehabilitation

Pre Application #

11. (Names of Buildings)

10. Reconstruction of:

Incremental review has been requested. Attach form

12. Project Location:

Date:

13. City: County of:

14. Project Tracking Number (PTN): 15. Estimated Cost:

16. Will project be submitted to the Office of Public School Construction (OPSC) for funding under the School Facility Program?NOYES (If "NO" skip to line 17)

16a. OPSC Application Number (if known):Client is requesting DSA verification for a High Performance Incentive grant or Energy Efficiency grant (not applicable if answer to 16 is "NO")

16b.

17. Approx. Total Floor Area (Sq. Ft): 18. Design Snow Load:

19. Applicant's statement of responsibility: I certify, under penalty of perjury, that I am acting for the school District/State agency in the legal capacity of agent making application for approval of plans and specifications. I further certify that, to the best of my knowledge, the answers given on both sides of this application are true and correct.

Signature of Applicant:

20. Name of Applicant:(Please Print)

Title:

21. Mailing Address: (If Applicant different from name shown in #2 or #22)

DSA 1 (rev 03-21-14) Page 1 of 2

Special Review requested

This is an Access only project OTC review is requested (Form DSA 145 is attached)

(Street Address)

-)(

-)(

DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITECT DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES STATE OF CALIFORNIA

1. Name of Facility:

Mailing Address: 2. School District (or State Agency)

NOYES /

Past Application Closed with DSA Certification ?

NOYES /


NOYES /


NOYES /


HP

Zip Code:

DSA USE ONLY

Titleor appropriate contact:

18a. (Prop 39) If project is using Prop 39 funds, enter the amount $:

FEE SCHED. CORRECT FEE FEE PAID UP/OP REFUNDACSS

DSA FILE NO. DSA APP. NO. DATE ASSIGNED ESTIMATED COST

DSA 1-INC

22. The following individual is in General Responsible Charge of the preparation of plans, specifications, and related documents, and observation of construction:

Print or type name of Architect or Engineer in General Responsible Charge CA Reg. No.

23. Firm Name:

Signature: Date:

DSA Oakland Region 1515 Clay Street, Suite 1201Oakland, CA 94612

DSA Los Angeles Region700 N. Alameda St, Suite 5-500 Los Angeles, CA 90012

DSA San Diego Region10920 Via Frontera Rd, Suite 300San Diego, CA 92127

DSA Sacramento Region1102 Q Street, Suite 5200Sacramento, CA 95811-6550

Disclaimer: I certify that this form is an exact duplicate (verbatim) of the form provided by the Division of the State Architect (DSA) i.e. Form DSA-1 (Revision of 03-21-2014). In the event a conflict should exist, the language in the current DSA form will prevail.

APPLICATION FOR APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS

Address:

24. The following individual is authorized to act as Alternate to the Architect or Engineer named above:

Printed Name Signature

CA Reg. No. Tel.# -)( E-mail Address

25. If portions of the preparation of the Plan and Specifications and observation of construction were delegated, show name of Registered Engineer, and related information below:

25a. Structural Engineer Name:

CA Reg. No.

E-mail

Tel.# -)(

25b. Mechanical Engineer Name:

CA Reg. No.

E-mail

Tel.# -)(

25c. Electrical Engineer Name:

CA Reg. No.

E-mail

Tel.# -)(

25d. Geotechnical Engineer Name:

CA Reg. No.

E-mail

Tel.# -)(

26. 27. OTHER FACTORS- Check appropriate boxes

GEOHAZARD (check 1 box only)

I have verified that this project does not require submittal of a Geohazard Report, per .

(For Relocatable Builidings Only) The school district requests waiver of durability requirements for substandard foundations per and acknowledges that a conditional approval is acceptable.

Geohazard report is required and has been submitted to CGS, in accordance with IR A-4.13.

WAIVER OF DURABILITY

This project involves delegation of responsibility other than reflected in line 25 above. See instructions

FLOOD HAZARD(check boxes that apply)For details, see

,

Section D and 3.03V andDSA

Project is located in a flood hazard area as defined by the adopted local jurisdiction flood hazard map.NOYES

NOYES Project is Alteration/Modernization, Rehabilitation or Reconstruction and value of project is more than 50% of the pre-improvement market value of the structure.

WIND LOADING (For Over The Counter projects only) I have verified this project wind exposure is C or less, has a basic wind speed of not more than 110 mph / 115 mph and a Topographical Factor Kzt=1.0 (ASCE 7-10, Section 26.8)

27a.

27b.

27c.

27d.

28. Statement of responsibility: Architect / Engineer in General Responsible ChargeI certify under penalty of perjury that all information presented on this form is true and correct and that I understand, and will fulfill, my responsibilities as the architect/engineer in general responsible charge of this project as defined in Title 24, Part 1, Section 4-341 of the California Code of Regulations.

(Architect Or Engineer In General Responsible Charge)

Indicate which Regional Office the Form DSA-1 is being submitted to:

Page 2 of 2

DSA 1

(Per Title 24, Part 1, Section 4-316, of the California Code of Regulations)

E-mail Address

For proper use of digital signature, see instructions for line 28

27e. FIRE HAZARDSEVERITY ZONE NOYES Is this project located in a Wildland-Urban Interface Fire Area per the Local Fire Authority, as

described in CBC, Chapter 7A?

DSA 1 (rev 03-21-14) DIVISION OF THE STATE ARCHITECT DEPARTMENT OF GENERAL SERVICES STATE OF CALIFORNIA

Telephone No.-)(

DSA IR A-4.13

IR 16-1.13

DSA-3

PR 14-01

Appendix G

October 13, 2014 Meeting Summary

Los Amigos Park Regulatory Agency Meeting

October 13, 2014

1. Introductions a. Attendees: Rick Valte, Allan Sheth (City of Santa Monica)

Terry Kamibayashi, Sam Stuart (Santa Monica-Malibu Unified School District [SMMUSD]) Carlos Araujo, Jay Chen (Department of State Architects [DSA]) Vik Bapna, Bill Young, Katie Harrel (CWE)

2. Project Background a. DSA wants to ensure that the project will not impact the structural stability of the street,

therefore recommends all structures are placed at a great enough distance from the right of way including the area for shoring.

3. DSA a. Point of Contact

i. Carlos Araujo will the point of contact b. Review Process

i. Plans may undergo structural, accessibility, and fire reviews depending on the specifics of the final design.

ii. Reviews will only be done at 100 percent plans. iii. An access review will be applicable if there are above ground structures or

features underground that require access. Interpretive signs and/or dugout fence replacement may warrant an access review. It is recommended that an architect is involved in the access plan submittal.

iv. DPH are solely responsible for reviewing the toilet flushing and irrigation plans. v. The number of plan sets depends on the reviews applicable listed in item "i"

above. Submittals must also include DSA 3 form (checklist), DSA 103 Form (testing and inspection), the plan check fee, and any other requirements identified in the checklist.

vi. Plans should include dimensions to specific features so that it is easy to determine what type of reviews would be applicable.

vii. Certification numbers from previously approved plans should be identified and referenced on the new plans for parking, restrooms, etc.

c. Structural Safety i. Structural review will include the review of shoring. ii. Structural should meet CBC 2013 requirements.

d. Timeframes i. An intake meeting is recommended when plans are at 100 percent to help speed

up the review process. ii. Submittals will take approximately 3-4 months. Once plans are submitted, six

weeks are required for plan dispersal to the appropriate reviewers and an additional three to four weeks will be necessary to conduct the review. Comments will be sent back and plans must be resubmitted.

e. Construction Monitoring i. DSA inspector(s) for continuous inspection will be required, most likely a class 2.

The inspector requires an on-site office with internet access, which should be included in budget.

ii. A full time on-site inspector (described above) will be employed by the developer on behalf of DSA and a field engineer (Jay Chan) will also be involved.

iii. Construction Oversight Process will be per PR13-01. 4. Department of Public Health (DPH) - items skipped because DPH representative was not present

at the meeting. a. Point of Contact b. Review Process c. Timeframes

Page | 1


October 13, 2014

d. Construction Inspection e. Monitoring Requirements

5. SMMUSD a. Agreement

i. Soil export is not reviewed by the school district, only soil import. ii. Requirements will be further discussed in the future. iii. There are specific wordings that must be included in the specs. Those will be

provided once the specs are drafted so that the district can easily identify what sections would be applicable. The specs should also include information about the monitoring process.

iv. The district would like to see the plans throughout the design process. b. Public Outreach

i. The outreach should include frequently asked questions (FAQ) before the parent teacher student association (PTSA) involvement.

ii. Dr. Greg from Parsons is the districts environmental consultant and should be contacted regarding the FAQ portion regarding student health.

6. Other Items a. The City of Santa Monica may be responsible for reviewing plans on behalf of DPH based

on the plumbing code depending on how the agency delegates responsibility. b. To ease DSA access reviews, the path of travel from the last project should be

referenced and checked to see if it still satisfies requirements. c. Codes specific to interpretive signage need to be referenced. d. It may be beneficial to move the storage system into the baseball diamond to avoid

fences and other triggers for DSA access review. e. Tapping of the eyewash water line will be under a different project and not part of this

project. The eyewash tapping will have an agreement between the City and SMMUSD under maintenance and will not require DSA access review.

f. Chris Comacho from the City Public Landscape Division should be contacted regarding the irrigation controller.

g. There needs to be thought into where contractors will park during construction. They may want to park by the beach and carpool to the site.

h. Metropolitan Water District (MWD) grant funds need to be spent by April 2016 ($400,000) and require a 50 percent match. It is anticipated that the bid and award would take three months so the schedule must be considered to accommodate DSA approval time. Further discussion with MWD will be required to determine if an extension is possible. Constructing the diversion and work outside the school property as a separate project on a faster timeline may be one way of using the funds without requiring DSA involvement.

i. If construction is done during the end of November until February 17th, 2016, SM Pony League will be displaced from November 27th to February 17th and their start of the season will be impacted. The opening day for 2015 is set for February 28th and it can be assumed it will be around the same time in 2016.

7. Next Meeting a. A meeting will be held next with DPH and will not include DSA.

Page | 2


October 13, 2014

Meeting Task List Personnel's

Name Action Group Task Action

Date Completion

Date Kickoff Meeting (September 14, 2014)

Allan Sheth Santa Monica Contact CCC staff to evaluate permit needs 9/16/2014 09/17/2014

Allan Sheth Santa Monica Standard Plans links to send to CWE 10/15/2014

Allan Sheth Santa Monica Plan Sheet Template to send to CWE 10/15/2014 9/10/2014

Allan Sheth Santa Monica Catch Basin to send to CWE 10/1/2014 9/10/2014

Allan Sheth Santa Monica Watershed Boundary to send to CWE 10/1/2014 9/10/2014

Allan Sheth Santa Monica Invoice format to send to CWE 10/1/2014

Vik Bapna CWE Setup meeting with DSA, DPH, and City 9/26/2014 9/26/2014

Allan Sheth Santa Monica Provide pump types, valves, control panel, UV system etc. that the City prefers and have components on hand

10/15/2014

Allan Sheth Santa Monica Check CEQA clearance with Paul Flory 10/15/2014 10/1/2014

Vik Bapna CWE Educational Signage startup 10/1/2014

Vik Bapna CWE Outreach Program startup 10/1/2014

Bill Young CWE Easement agreement exhibit to be descriptive vs. plan 10/1/2014

Vik Bapna CWE Develop format for log of challenges and resolutions 9/22/2014 9/22/2014

Regulatory Agency Meeting (October 13, 2014)

Allan Sheth Santa Monica Contact MWD regarding grant extension

Sam Stuart SMMUSD Provide wording for specs

Page | 3

Appendix H

California Coastal Commission References

STATE OF CALIFORNIA— THE NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, JR. GOVERNOR

CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SOUTH COAST DISTRICT OFFICE 200 OCEANGATE, 10TH FLOOR LONG BEACH, CA 90802-4416 VOICE AND TDD (562) 590-5071 FAX (562) 590-5084

Revised 3/17/08

PERMIT APPLICATION INSTRUCTIONS A completed application includes the APPLICATION FOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, the appendices to the application, and Required Attachments. Please answer all questions. If a question is not applicable to your project, indicate “N.A.” Refer to pages 7–8 of the APPLICATION for a list of Required Attachments. Incomplete applications will not be accepted for filing. All exhibits must be legible.

The following checklist is provided for the convenience of applicants in gathering necessary application materials; it is not a complete statement of filing requirements.

Page Item

Proof of applicant’s interest in the property. ................................................................ 7 1

Assessor’s parcel map(s) showing the proposed development site and all adjacent properties within 100 feet of the property boundary. .................................................... 7 2

Stamped envelopes (no postage meter please) addressed to neighboring property owners and occupants and other interested parties and a list of the same. ................ 7, 8 4, 5

Vicinity map. ................................................................................................................ 8 6

Two sets of each: project plan(s), site plan(s), and applicable other plans. (All plans must be stamped and signed “Approved in Concept” by the applicable local government. Please note the size which plans are required to be submitted.)

8 7, 11

Copy of any environmental documents (DRAFT AND FINAL EIRs, EISs, NEGATIVE DECLARATION) if prepared for the project and any comments and responses. ............. 8 9

Verification of all other permits, permissions or approvals applied for or granted by public agencies. ........................................................................................................... 8 10

Copy of geology or soils report (if necessary). ............................................................ 8 11

Local approval of the project. ...................................................................................... Appendix B

Has the Notice of Pending Permit been posted in a conspicuous place? .................... Appendix D

Filing fee. ................................................................................................................... Appendix E

Have you and the agent (if appropriate) signed the application at the appropriate lines on pages 9, 10, and 13?

APPLICATION FOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT

SECTION I. APPLICANT

1. Name, mailing address, and telephone number of all applicants.

(Area code/daytime phone number)

Note: All applicants for the development must complete Appendix A, the declaration of campaign contributions.

2. Name, mailing address and telephone number of applicant’s representatives, if any. Please include all representatives who will communicate on behalf of the applicant or the applicant’s business partners, for compensation, with the Commission or the staff. (It is the applicant’s responsibility to update this list, as appropriate, including after the application is accepted for filing. Failure to provide this information prior to communication with the Commission or staff may result in denial of the permit or criminal penalties.)

(Area code/daytime phone number)

SECTION II. PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT

Please answer all questions. Where questions do not apply to your project (for instance, project height for a land division), indicate Not Applicable or N.A.

1. Project Location. Include street address, city, and/or county. If there is no street address, include other description such as nearest cross streets.

number street city county Assessor’s Parcel Number(s) (obtainable from tax bill or County Assessor): FOR OFFICE USE ONLY RECEIVED FILED FEE

APPLICATION NUMBER DATE PAID

2

2. Describe the proposed development in detail. Include secondary improvements such as grading, septic tanks, water wells, roads, driveways, outbuildings, fences, etc. (Attach additional sheets as necessary.)

a. If multi-family residential, state:

Number of units Number of bedrooms per unit (both existing and proposed)

Type of ownership proposed

Existing units

Proposed new units

Net number of units on completion of project

rental

condominium

stock cooperative

time share

other

b. If land division or lot line adjustment, indicate:

Number of lots Size of lots to be created (indicate net or gross acreage) Existing Lots Proposed new lots Net number of lots on

completion of project Existing Proposed

3

3. Estimated cost of development (not including cost of land) $

4. Project height: Maximum height of structure (ft.) above existing (natural) grade ................................. above finished grade ............................................. as measured from centerline of frontage road .......

5. Total number of floors in structure, including subterranean floors, lofts, and mezzanines .....................

6. Gross floor area excluding parking (sq.ft.) ....................

Gross floor area including covered parking and accessory buildings (sq.ft.) ...........................................

7. Lot area (within property lines) (sq.ft. or acre) ....................

Lot coverage Existing (sq.ft. or acre) New proposed (sq.ft. or acre) Total (sq.ft. or acre)

Building

Paved area

Landscaped area

Unimproved area

Grand Total (should equal lot area as shown in #7 above)

8. Is any grading proposed? ............................................................................ Yes No

If yes, complete the following.

a) Amount of cut cu. yds. d) Maximum height of cut slope

ft.

b) Amount of fill cu. yds. e) Maximum height of fill slope

ft.

c) Amount of import or export (circle which)

cu. yds. f) Location of borrow or disposal site

Grading, drainage, and erosion control plans must be included with this application, if applicable. In certain areas, an engineering geology report must also be included. See page 7, items # 7 and 11. Please list any geologic or other technical reports of which you are aware that apply to this property:

4

9. Parking: Number of parking spaces (indicate whether standard or compact)

Existing Spaces Proposed new spaces Net number of spaces on completion of project

Is any existing parking being removed? ........................................................ Yes No

If yes, how many spaces? size

Is tandem parking existing and/or proposed? ............................................... Yes No

If yes, how many tandem sets? size

10.

Are utility extensions for the following needed to serve the project? (Please check yes or no)

a) water b) gas c) sewer d) electric e) telephone

Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

No No No No No

Will electric or telephone extensions be above-ground? .............................. Yes No

11. Does project include removal of trees or other vegetation? ......................... Yes No

If yes, indicate number, type and size of trees

or type and area of other vegetation

SECTION III. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

The relationship of the development to the applicable items below must be explained fully. Attach additional sheets if necessary.

1. Present use of property.

a. Are there existing structures on the property? ....................................... Yes No

If yes, describe

5

b. Will any existing structures be demolished? .......................................... Yes No

Will any existing structures be removed? .............................................. Yes No

If yes to either question, describe the type of development to be demolished or removed, including the relocation site, if applicable.

2. Is the proposed development to be governed by any Development Agreement? .................................................................................................. Yes No

3. Has any application for development on this site including any subdivision been submitted previously to the California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission or the Coastal Commission? ................................................... Yes No

If yes, state previous application number(s)

4. a. Is the development between the first public road and the sea (including lagoons, bays, and other bodies of water connected to the sea) ............ Yes No

b. If yes, is public access to the shoreline and along the coast currently available on the site or near the site? .................................................... Yes No

If yes, indicate the location and nature of the access, including the distance from the project site, if applicable.

c. Will the project have an effect on public access to and along the shoreline, either directly or indirectly (e.g., removing parking used for access to the beach)? ............................................................................ Yes No

If yes, describe the effect

6

5. Does the development involve diking, filling, draining, dredging or placing structures in open coastal waters, wetlands, estuaries, or lakes? (Please check yes or no)

a) diking b) filling c) dredging d) placement of structures

Yes Yes Yes Yes

No No No No

Amount of material to be dredged or filled (indicate which) cu. yds

Location of dredged material disposal site

Has a U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ permit been applied for? .................. Yes No

6. Will the development extend onto or adjoin any beach, tidelands, submerged lands or public trust lands? ....................................................... Yes No

For projects on State-owned lands, additional information may be required as set forth in Section IV, paragraph 10.

7. Will the development protect existing lower-cost visitor and recreational facilities? ...................................................................................................... Yes No

Will the development provide public or private recreational opportunities? .. Yes No

If yes, explain.

8. Will the proposed development convert land currently or previously used for agriculture to another use? .......................................................................... Yes No

If yes, how many acres will be converted?

9. Is the proposed development in or near:

a. Sensitive habitat areas (Biological survey may be required) ........................... Yes No

b. Areas of state or federally listed rare, threatened, or endangered species ................................................................................................... Yes No

c. 100-year floodplain (Hydrologic mapping may be required) ............................ Yes No

d. Park or recreation area .......................................................................... Yes No

10. Is the proposed development visible from:

a. State Highway 1 or other scenic route ................................................... Yes No

7

b. Park, beach, or recreation area ............................................................. Yes No

c. Harbor area ........................................................................................... Yes No

11. Does the site contain any: (If yes to any of the following, please explain on an attached sheet.)

a. Historic resources ................................................................................. Yes No

b. Archaeological resources ...................................................................... Yes No

c. Paleontological resources ..................................................................... Yes No

12. Where a stream or spring is to be diverted, provide the following information:

Estimated streamflow or spring yield (gpm)

If well is to be used, existing yield (gpm)

If water source is on adjacent property, attach Division of Water Rights approval and property owner’s approval.

SECTION IV. REQUIRED ATTACHMENTS

The following items must be submitted with this form as part of the application.

1. Proof of the applicant’s legal interest in the property. A copy of any of the following will be acceptable: current tax bill, recorded deed, lease, easement, or current policy of title insurance. Preliminary title reports will not be accepted for this purpose. Documentation reflecting intent to purchase such as a signed Offer to Purchase along with a receipt of deposit or signed final escrow document is also acceptable, but in such a case, issuance of the permit may be contingent on submission of evidence satisfactory to the Executive Director that the sale has been completed.

The identity of all persons or entities which have an ownership interest in the property superior to that of the applicant must be provided.

2. Assessor’s parcel map(s) showing the page number, the applicant’s property, and all other properties within 100 feet (excluding roads) of the property lines of the project site. (Available from the County Assessor.)

3. Copies of required local approvals for the proposed project, including zoning variances, use permits, etc., as noted on Local Agency Review Form, Appendix B. Appendix B must be completed and signed by the local government in whose jurisdiction the project site is located.

4. Stamped envelopes addressed to each property owner and occupant of property situated within 100 feet of the property lines of the project site (excluding roads), along with a list containing the names, addresses and assessor’s parcel numbers of same. The envelopes must be plain (i.e., no return address), and regular business size (9 1/2" x 4 1/8"). Include first class postage on each one. Metered postage is not acceptable. Use Appendix C, attached, for the listing of names and addresses. (Alternate notice provisions may be employed at the discretion of the District Director under extraordinary circumstances.)

8

5. Stamped, addressed envelopes (no metered postage, please) and a list of names and addresses of all other parties known to the applicant to be interested in the proposed development (such as persons expressing interest at a local government hearing, etc.).

6. A vicinity or location map (copy of Thomas Bros. or other road map or USGS quad map) with the project site clearly marked.

7. Copy(s) of plans drawn to scale, including (as applicable): site plans floor plans building elevations grading, drainage, and erosion control plans landscape plans septic system plans

Trees to be removed must be marked on the site plan. In addition, a reduced site plan, 8 1/2" x 11" in size, must be submitted. Reduced copies of complete project plans will be required for large projects. NOTE: See Instruction page for number of sets of plans required.

8. Where septic systems are proposed, evidence of County approval or Regional Water Quality Control Board approval. Where water wells are proposed, evidence of County review and approval.

9. A copy of any Draft or Final Negative Declaration, Environmental Impact Report (EIR) or Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) prepared for the project. If available, comments of all reviewing agencies and responses to comments must be included.

10. Verification of all other permits, permissions or approvals applied for or granted by public agencies such as: Department of Fish and Game State Lands Commission Army Corps of Engineers U.S. Coast Guard

For projects such as seawalls located on or near state tidelands or public trust lands, the Coastal Commission must have a written determination from the State Lands Commission whether the project would encroach onto such lands and, if so, whether the State Lands Commission has approved such encroachment.

11. For development on a bluff face, bluff top, or in any area of high geologic risk, a comprehensive, site-specific geology and soils report (including maps) prepared in accordance with the Coastal Commission’s Interpretive Guidelines. Copies of the guidelines are available from the District Office.

SECTION V. NOTICE TO APPLICANTS

Under certain circumstances, additional material may be required prior to issuance of a coastal development permit. For example, where offers of access or open space dedication are required,

9

preliminary title reports, land surveys, legal descriptions, subordination agreements, and other outside agreements will be required prior to issuance of the permit.

In addition, the Commission may adopt or amend regulations affecting the issuance of coastal development permits. If you would like notice of such proposals during the pendency of this application, if such proposals are reasonably related to this application, indicate that desire. .................................... Yes No SECTION VI. COMMUNICATION WITH COMMISSIONERS Decisions of the Coastal Commission must be made on the basis of information in the public record available to all commissioners and the public. Permit applicants and interested parties and their representatives may contact individual commissioners to discuss permit matters outside the public hearing (an “ex parte” communication). However, the commissioner must provide a complete description of the communication either in writing prior to the hearing or at the public hearing, to assure that such communication does not jeopardize the fairness of the hearing or potentially result in invalidation of the Commission’s decision by a court. Any written material sent to a commissioner should also be sent to the commission’s office in San Francisco and the appropriate district office for inclusion in the public record and distribution to other commissioners. SECTION VII. CERTIFICATION

1. I hereby certify that I, or my authorized representative, have completed and posted or will post the Notice of Pending Permit stock card in a conspicuous place on the property within three days of submitting the application to the Commission office.

2. I hereby certify that I have read this completed application and that, to the best of my knowledge, the information in this application and all attached appendices and exhibits is complete and correct. I understand that the failure to provide any requested information or any misstatements submitted in support of the application shall be grounds for either refusing to accept this application, for denying the permit, for suspending or revoking a permit issued on the basis of such misrepresentations, or for seeking of such further relief as may seem proper to the Commission.

3. I hereby authorize representatives of the California Coastal Commission to conduct site inspections on my property. Unless arranged otherwise, these site inspections shall take place between the hours of 8:00 A.M. and 5:00 P.M.

Signature of Authorized Agent(s) or if no agent, signature of Applicant NOTE: IF SIGNED ABOVE BY AGENT, APPLICANT MUST SIGN BELOW.

SECTION VIII. AUTHORIZATION OF AGENT

I hereby authorize to act as my representative

and to bind me in all matters concerning this application.

Signature of Applicant(s) (Only the applicant(s) may sign here to authorize an agent)

10

APPLICATION FOR COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT

APPENDIX A

DECLARATION OF CAMPAIGN CONTRIBUTIONS

Government Code Section 84308 prohibits any Commissioner from voting on a project if he or she has received campaign contributions in excess of $250 within the past year from project proponents or opponents, their agents, employees or family, or any person with a financial interest in the project.

In the event of such contributions, a Commissioner must disqualify himself or herself from voting on the project.

Each applicant must declare below whether any such contributions have been made to any of the listed Commissioners or Alternates (see last page).

CHECK ONE

The applicants, their agents, employees, family and/or any person with a financial interest in the project have not contributed over $250 to any Commissioner(s) or Alternate(s) within the past year.

The applicants, their agents, employees, family, and/or any person with a financial interest in the project have contributed over $250 to the Commissioner(s) or Alternate(s) listed below within the past year.

Commissioner or Alternate



Signature of Applicant or Authorized Agent Date

Please type or print your name

11

APPENDIX B

LOCAL AGENCY REVIEW FORM SECTION A (TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT) Applicant Project Description Location Assessor's Parcel Number

SECTION B (TO BE COMPLETED BY LOCAL PLANNING OR BUILDING INSPECTION DEPARTMENT)

Zoning Designation du/ac

General or Community Plan Designation du/ac Local Discretionary Approvals

Proposed development meets all zoning requirements and needs no local permits other than building permits.

Proposed development needs local discretionary approvals noted below. Needed Received

Design/Architectural review Variance for Rezone from Tentative Subdivision/Parcel Map No. Grading/Land Development Permit No. Planned Residential/Commercial Development Approval Site Plan Review Condominium Conversion Permit Conditional, Special, or Major Use Permit No. Other

CEQA Status Categorically Exempt Class Item Negative Declaration Granted (Date) Environmental Impact Report Required, Final Report Certified (Date) Other

Prepared for the City/County of by

Date Title

12

Application No. ____________

APPENDIX C

LIST OF PROPERTY OWNERS AND OCCUPANTS WITHIN 100 FEET AND THEIR ADDRESSES (MAKE ADDITIONAL COPIES OF THIS SHEET AS NECESSARY)

13

APPENDIX D (Permit Application)

DECLARATION OF POSTING Prior to or at the time the application is submitted for filing, the applicant must post, at a conspicuous place, easily read by the public and as close as possible to the site of the proposed development, notice that an application for the proposed development has been submitted to the Commission. Such notice shall contain a general description of the nature of the proposed development. The Commission furnishes the applicant with a standardized form to be used for such posting. If the applicant fails to post the completed notice form and sign the Declaration of Posting, the Executive Director of the Commission shall refuse to file the application. 14 Cal. Code Regs. Section 13054(d).

Please sign and date this Declaration of Posting form when the site is posted; it serves as proof of posting. It should be returned to our office with the application.

Pursuant to the requirements of California Administrative Code Section 13054(b), I hereby certify

that on, I or my authorized representative posted the Notice (date of posting)

of Pending Permit for application to obtain a coastal development permit for the development of

(description of development)

Located at

(address of development or assessor’s parcel number)

The public notice was posted at

(a conspicuous place, easily seen by the public and as close as possible to the site of the proposed development)

(signature)

(date)

NOTE: Your application cannot be processed until this Declaration of Posting is signed and returned to this office.

FOR OFFICE USE ONLY PERMIT NUMBER .................. RECEIVED ............................ DECLARATION COMPLETE .....

14

APPENDIX E

FILING FEE SCHEDULE

(EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014)

FEES WILL BE ADJUSTED EACH YEAR ON JULY 1, ACCORDING TO THE CALIFORNIA CONSUMER PRICE INDEX

Pursuant to Government Code section 6103, public entities are exempt from the fees set forth in this schedule.

Permits shall not be issued without full payment for all applicable fees. If overpayment of a fee occurs, a refund will be issued. Fees are assessed at the time of application, based on the project as proposed initially. If the size or scope of a proposed development is amended during the application review process, the fee may be changed. If a permit application is withdrawn, a refund will be due only if no significant staff review time has been expended (e.g., the staff report has not yet been prepared). Denial of a permit application by the Commission is not grounds for a refund.

If different types of development are included on one site under one application, the fee is based on the sum of each fee that would apply if each development were applied for separately, not to exceed $109,600 for residential development and $274,000 for all other types of development.

Fees for after-the-fact (ATF) permit applications shall be five times the regular permit application fee unless the Executive Director reduces the fee to no less than two times the regular permit application fee. The Executive Director may reduce the fee if it is determined that either: (1) the ATF application can be processed by staff without significant additional review time (as compared to the time required for the processing of a regular permit,) or (2) the owner did not undertake the development for which the owner is seeking the ATF permit.

In addition to the above fees, the Commission may require the applicant to reimburse it for any additional reasonable expenses incurred in its consideration of the permit application, including the costs of providing public notice.

The Executive Director shall waive the application fee where requested by resolution of the Commission. Fees for green buildings or affordable housing projects may be reduced, pursuant to Section 13055(h) of the Commission’s regulations.

SEE SECTION 13055 OF THE COMMISSION’S REGULATIONS (CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS, TITLE 14)

FOR FULL TEXT OF THE REQUIREMENTS

15

I. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT1 De minimis waiver .......................................................................................... $ 548

Administrative permit ..................................................................................... $ 2,7402

A. Detached residential development

Regular calendar for up to 4 detached, single-family dwelling(s)3,4

1,500 square feet or less ....................................................................... $ 3,288/ea

1,501 to 5,000 square feet ..................................................................... $ 4,932/ea

5,001 to 10,000 square feet ................................................................... $ 6,576/ea

10,001 or more square feet .................................................................... $ 8,220/ea

Regular calendar for more than 4 detached, single-family dwellings3,4

1,500 square feet or less ....................................................................... $ 16,440 or $1,096/ea5 whichever is greater

1,501 to 5,000 square feet ..................................................................... $ 24,660 or $1,644/ea5

whichever is greater

5,001 to 10,000 square feet ................................................................... $ 32,880 or $2,192/ea5 whichever is greater

10,001 or more square feet .................................................................... $ 41,100 or $2,740/ea5 whichever is greater

B. Attached residential development

2–4 units ........................................................................................................ $ 8,220

More than 4 units ........................................................................................... $ 10,960 or $822/ea6 whichever is greater

C. Additions or improvements

If not a waiver or an amendment to a previous coastal development permit, the fee is assessed according to the schedule in A. above (i.e., based on the calendar and/or size of the addition, plus the grading fee, if applicable).

If handled as an amendment to a previous coastal development permit, see Amendments (in Section III.F).

1 Additional fee for grading applies. (See Section III.A of this fee schedule.) 2 Additional fee will apply if the project is removed from the Administrative Calendar and rescheduled on the Regular Calendar. 3 “Square footage” includes gross internal floor space of main house and attached garage(s), plus any detached structures (e.g., guest houses,

detached bedrooms, in-law units, garages, barns, art studios, tool sheds, and other outbuildings). 4 For developments that include residences of different sizes, the fee shall be based upon the average square footage of all the residences. 5 Not to exceed $109,600. 6 Not to exceed $54,800.

16

II. OFFICE, COMMERCIAL, CONVENTION, INDUSTRIAL (INCLUDING ENERGY FACILITIES), AND OTHER DEVELOPMENT NOT OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED IN THIS SECTION7,8,9

A. Based on Gross Square Footage

1,000 square feet (gross) or less ................................................................... $ 5,480

1,001 to 10,000 square feet (gross) ............................................................... $ 10,960

10,001 to 25,000 square feet (gross) ............................................................. $ 16,440


50,001 to 100,000 square feet (gross) ........................................................... $ 32,880

100,001 or more square feet (gross) .............................................................. $ 54,800

B. Based on Development Cost10

Development cost up to and including $100,000 ............................................ $ 3,288

$100,001 to $500,000 .................................................................................... $ 6,576

$500,001 to $2,000,000 ................................................................................. $ 10,960

$2,000,001 to $5,000,000................................................................................ $ 21,920

$5,000,001 to $10,000,000............................................................................. $ 27,400

$10,000,001 to $25,000,000............................................................................ $ 32,880

$25,000,001 to $50,000,000............................................................................ $ 54,800

$50,000,001 to $100,000,000 ......................................................................... $ 109,600

$100,000,001 or more ..................................................................................... $ 274,000

III. OTHER FEES A. Grading11

50 cubic yards or less .................................................................................... $ 0

51 to 100 cubic yards ..................................................................................... $ 548

101 to 1,000 cubic yards ................................................................................ $ 1,096

1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards ........................................................................... $ 2,192

10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards ....................................................................... $ 3,288

100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards ..................................................................... $ 5,480

200,001 or more cubic yards .......................................................................... $ 10,960

B. Lot line adjustment12 ...................................................................................... $ 3,288 7 The fee shall be based on either the gross square footage or the development cost, whichever is greater. 8 Additional fee for grading applies. (See section III.A of this schedule). 9 Pursuant to section 13055(a)(5) of the Commission’s regulations, this category includes all development not otherwise identified in this section,

such as seawalls, docks and water wells. 10 Development cost includes all expenditures, including the cost for planning, engineering, architectural, and other services, made or to be made for

designing the project plus the estimated cost of construction of all aspects of the project both inside and outside the Commission’s jurisdiction. 11 The fee for grading is based on the cubic yards of cut, plus the cubic yards of fill.

17

C. Subdivision13

Up to 4 new lots ............................................................................................. $ 3,288/ea

More than 4 new lots ...................................................................................... $ 13,152 plus $1,096 for each lot above 4

D. Administrative permit ...................................................................................... $ 2,74014

E. Emergency permit .......................................................................................... $ 1,09615

F. Amendment

Immaterial amendment .......................................................................... $ 1,096

Material amendment .................. [50% of fee applicable to underlying permit if it were submitted today]

$ ___________ (calculate fee)

G. Temporary event which requires a permit pursuant to Public Resources Code section 30610(i)

If scheduled on administrative calendar…………………………………… $ 1,096

If not scheduled on administrative calendar………………………………. $ 2,740

H. Extension16 and Reconsideration

Single-family residence .......................................................................... $ 548

All other development ............................................................................ $ 1,096

I. Request for continuance

1st request ............................................................................................. No charge

Each subsequent request (where Commission approves the continuance) ....................................

$ 1,096

J. De minimis or other waivers ........................................................................... $ 548

K. Federal Consistency Certification17 [The fee is assessed according to sections I, II, and III, above] ......................

$ _____

L. Appeal of a denial of a permit by a local government18 [The fee is assessed according to sections I, II, and III, above] .....................

$ _____

12 A lot line adjustment is between adjoining parcels where the land taken from one parcel is added to an adjoining parcel, and where a greater

number of parcels than originally existed is not thereby created. 13 The fee is charged for each parcel created in addition to the parcels that originally existed. 14 Additional fee will apply if the project is removed from the Administrative Calendar and rescheduled on the Regular Calendar. 15 The emergency application fee is credited toward the follow-up permit application fee. 16 If permit extension is objected to by the Commission and the application is set for a new hearing, then a new application fee is required, based on

type of development and/or applicable calendar. 17 Fees for federal consistency items will be assessed now that the Commission has received approval from NOAA to amend the California Coastal

Management Program. 18 Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 30602 or 30603(a)(5).

18

M. Written Permit Exemption ............................................................................... $ 274

N. Written Boundary Determination .................................................................... $ 274

O. Coastal Zone Boundary Adjustment ............................................................... $ 5,480

TOTAL SUBMITTED $

TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF SUBMITTED FEE VERIFIED BY: DATE:

IS SUBMITTED AMOUNT CORRECT?

Yes. Applicant has correctly characterized the development, and payment is appropriate.

Applicant did not fill out form, thus staff has marked the form to compute the fee, and applicant has paid fee.

No. Why?

____________________________

____________________________

REFUND OR ADDITIONAL FEE REQUIRED? (STATE REASON)

Refund amount ( ___________________________________________________________________________ ) Additional fee amount ( ___________________________________________________________________________ )

REMINDER: RECORD FEE PAYMENT IN PERMIT LOG FINAL FEE VERIFIED BY: (TO BE COMPLETED AFTER COMMISSION ACTION) DATE:

19

NOTICE OF PENDING PERMIT

A PERMIT APPLICATION FOR DEVELOPMENT ON THIS SITE IS PENDING BEFORE THE CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION.

PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT: ____________________________

_____________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________

_____________________________________________________

LOCATION: ___________________________________________

_____________________________________________________

APPLICANT: __________________________________________

APPLICATION NUMBER:_________________________________

DATE NOTICE POSTED: ________________________________

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION, PLEASE PHONE OR WRITE THE OFFICE LISTED BELOW BETWEEN 8 A.M. AND 5 P.M., WEEKDAYS.

CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION SOUTH COAST DISTRICT OFFICE 200 OCEANGATE, 10TH FLOOR LONG BEACH, CA 90802-4402 (562) 590-5071

PRINT ON YELLOW STOCK CARD

STATE OF CALIFORNIA—THE NATURAL RESOURCES AGENCY EDMUND G. BROWN, JR., GOVERNOR

CALIFORNIA COASTAL COMMISSION 45 FREMONT, SUITE 2000 SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105- 2219 VOICE (415) 904- 5200 FAX ( 415) 904- 5400 TDD (415) 597-5885

W6f DATE June 27, 2014 TO: Coastal Commission and Other Interested Persons FROM: Charles Lester, Executive Director

Susan Hansch, Chief Deputy Director SUBJECT: Filing Fee Increase Effective July 1, 2014

Information Item/No Commission Action Required ______________________________________________________________________________ The Commission’s Application filing fees are governed by the Coastal Act and implementing regulations. (See Pub. Res. Code § 30620(c); 14 Cal Code Reg § 13055.) Under the Commission’s regulations, the filing fees are adjusted annually to account for inflation. The change from 2013 is 1.9 percent. The cumulative increase from 2008 to 2014 is 9.6 percent. Specifically, the Commission’s regulations provide:

“The fees established … shall be increased annually by an amount calculated on the basis of the percentage change from the year in which this provision becomes effective in the California Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers as determined by the Department of Industrial Relations pursuant to Revenue and Taxation Code Section 2212. The increased fee amounts shall become effective on July 1 of each year. The new fee amounts shall be rounded to the nearest dollar.” (Cal. Code Regs., tit. 14, § 13055(c).)

This requirement to adjust annually for inflation became effective in March 2008. The fees generated are deposited into the Coastal Act Services Fund. Upon appropriation by the Legislature, the Commission may expend the money for implementation of the Coastal Act. Each year, $500,000 (adjusted annually for inflation) is transferred to the State Coastal Conservancy’s Coastal Access Account. (See Pub. Res. Code §§ 30620.1 and 30620.2.) Based on the Department of Industrial Relations CPI Index Calculator, the California Consumer Price Index for Urban Consumers between April 2008 thru April 2014 increased by 9.6%. (http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/CPI/CPICalc.xls.) The schedule of filing fees will be adjusted for inflation effective July 1, 2014. The new fee schedule will be posted on the Commission’s website and is attached, hereto. (See Exhibit 1.) No Commission action is required. Attachments:

Exhibit 1: Filing Fee Chart Exhibit 2: Filing Fee Revised Schedule for Permit Application Form (effective July 1, 2014)

http://www.dir.ca.gov/dlsr/CPI/CPICalc.xls

EXHIBIT 1

Filing Fee Chart

Fee # CCC Filing Fee Category March 2008

Original Filing Fee Current Filing Fee Proposed Fee Increase Based on Original Filing

Fee at CPI 9.6% Inflation Rate

Rounded to the nearest $1

1 Waiver $500 $ 538 $ 548.00 $ 548 2 Administrative Permit $2,500 $ 2,690 $ 2,740.00 $ 2,740 3 Up to 4 SFRs <1,500 sq. feet $3,000 $ 3,228 $ 3,288.00 $ 3,288 4 Up to 4 SFRs 1,501<5,000 sq. feet $4,500 $ 4,842 $ 4,932.00 $ 4,932 5 Up to 4 SFRs 5,001<10,000 sq. feet $6,000 $ 6,456 $ 6,576.00 $ 6,576 6 Up to 4 SFRs >10,001 sq. feet $7,500 $ 8,070 $ 8,220.00 $ 8,220

7 5 or more SFRs average <1,500 sq. feet $15,000 $ 16,140 $ 16,440.00 $ 16,440

$1,000 $ 1,076 $ 1,096.00 $ 1,096

8 5 or more SFRs average 1,501<5,000 sq. feet $22,500 $ 24,210 $ 24,660.00 $ 24,660

$1,500 $ 1,614 $ 1,644.00 $ 1,644

9 5 or more SFRs average 5,001<10,000 sq. feet $30,000 $ 32,280 $ 32,880.00 $ 32,880

$2,000 $ 2,152 $ 2,192.00 $ 2,192

10 5 or more SFRs average >10,001 sq. feet $37,500 $ 40,350 $ 41,100.00 $ 41,100

$2,500 $ 2,690 $ 2,740.00 $ 2,740

11 Attached Residential up to 4 units $7,500 $ 8,070 $ 8,220.00 $ 8,220 12 More than 4 Attached Residential units $10,000 $ 10,760 $ 10,960.00 $ 10,960

$750 $ 807 $ 822.00 $ 822

13 Subdivisions – up to 4 new lots $3,000 $ 3,228 $ 3,288.00 $ 3,288

More than 4 new lots $12,000 $ 12,912 $ 13,152.00 $ 13,152

$1,000 $ 1,076 $ 1,096.00 $ 1,096

14 Grading <51 c.y. $0 $ - $ - $ - 15 Grading 51<100 c.y. $500 $ 538 $ 548.00 $ 548 16 Grading 101<1000 c.y. $1,000 $ 1,076 $ 1,096.00 $ 1,096 17 Grading 1,001<10,000 c.y. $2,000 $ 2,152 $ 2,192.00 $ 2,192 18 Grading 10,001<100,000 c.y. $3,000 $ 3,228 $ 3,288.00 $ 3,288 19 Grading 100,001<200,000 c.y. $5,000 $ 5,380 $ 5,480.00 $ 5,480 20 Grading >200,000 c.y. $10,000 $ 10,760 $ 10,960.00 $ 10,960

Commercial/Industrial Based on Gross Sq.Ft. $ - $ - $ -

21 Commercial/Industrial <1,000 sq. feet $5,000 $ 5,380 $ 5,480.00 $ 5,480

22 Commercial/Industrial 1,001<10,000 sq. feet $10,000 $ 10,760 $ 10,960.00 $ 10,960




26 Commercial/Industrial >100,001 sq. feet $50,000 $ 53,800 $ 54,800.00 $ 54,800

Commercial/Industrial Based on Devt Cost $ - $ - $ -

27 Commercial/Industrial <$100,000 $3,000 $ 3,228 $ 3,288.00 $ 3,288

28 Commercial/Industrial $100,001<$500,000 $6,000 $ 6,456 $ 6,576.00 $ 6,576

29 Commercial/Industrial $500,001<$2,000,000 $10,000 $ 10,760 $ 10,960.00 $ 10,960

30 Commercial/Industrial $2,000,001<$5,000,000 $20,000 $ 21,520 $ 21,920.00 $ 21,920





35 Commercial/Industrial >$100,000,000 $250,000 $ 269,000 $ 274,000.00 $ 274,000 36 Emergency permit $1,000 $ 1,076 $ 1,096.00 $ 1,096 37 Immaterial amendment $1,000 $ 1,076 $ 1,096.00 $ 1,096 38 Material amendment 50% of fee

39 Extension or reconsideration for single-family residences $500 $ 538 $ 548.00 $ 548

40 Extension or reconsideration for all other developments $1,000 $ 1,076 $ 1,096.00 $ 1,096

41 Temporary Events - if administrative $1,000 $ 1,076 $ 1,096.00 $ 1,096

42 Temporary Events - if not administrative $2,500 $ 2,690 $ 2,740.00 $ 2,740

43 Permit Exemption $250 $ 269 $ 274.00 $ 274 44 Continuance 1st Request $0 $ - $ - $ -

45 Continuance for each subsequent request if approved by Commission

$1,000 $ 1,076 $ 1,096.00 $ 1,096

46 DeMinimis Waiver or other Waivers $500 $ 538 $ 548.00 $ 548 47 Boundary Determination $250 $ 269 $ 274.00 $ 274 48 Boundary Adjustment $5,000 $ 5,380 $ 5,480.00 $ 5,480 49 Lot Line Adjustment $3,000 $ 3,228 $ 3,288.00 $ 3,288

50 After the Fact*** 5x normal permit

fee

51 Federal Consistency Certification

52 Appeal of a denial of a permit by local govt

*Whichever is greater. [*] Not to exceed $109,600 [**] Not to exceed $54,800 **Fees and fee increases will vary depending on project type.

California Coastal Commission Filing Fees Proposed Modifications per the Consumer Price Index

EXHIBIT 2

COASTAL DEVELOPMENT PERMIT FORM

APPENDIX E

FILING FEE SCHEDULE

(EFFECTIVE JULY 1, 2014)

FEES WILL BE ADJUSTED EACH YEAR ON JULY 1, ACCORDING TO THE CALIFORNIA CONSUMER PRICE INDEX

Pursuant to Government Code section 6103, public entities are exempt from the fees set forth in this schedule.

Permits shall not be issued without full payment for all applicable fees. If overpayment of a fee occurs, a refund will be issued. Fees are assessed at the time of application, based on the project as proposed initially. If the size or scope of a proposed development is amended during the application review process, the fee may be changed. If a permit application is withdrawn, a refund will be due only if no significant staff review time has been expended (e.g., the staff report has not yet been prepared). Denial of a permit application by the Commission is not grounds for a refund.

If different types of development are included on one site under one application, the fee is based on the sum of each fee that would apply if each development were applied for separately, not to exceed $109,600 for residential development and $274,000 for all other types of development.

Fees for after-the-fact (ATF) permit applications shall be five times the regular permit application fee unless the Executive Director reduces the fee to no less than two times the regular permit application fee. The Executive Director may reduce the fee if it is determined that either: (1) the ATF application can be processed by staff without significant additional review time (as compared to the time required for the processing of a regular permit,) or (2) the owner did not undertake the development for which the owner is seeking the ATF permit.

In addition to the above fees, the Commission may require the applicant to reimburse it for any additional reasonable expenses incurred in its consideration of the permit application, including the costs of providing public notice.

The Executive Director shall waive the application fee where requested by resolution of the Commission. Fees for green buildings or affordable housing projects may be reduced, pursuant to Section 13055(h) of the Commission’s regulations.

See Section 13055 of the Commission’s regulations

(California Code of Regulations, Title 14) for full text of the requirements

I. RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT1 De minimis waiver .......................................................................................... $ 548

Administrative permit ..................................................................................... $ 2,7402

A. Detached residential development

Regular calendar for up to 4 detached, single-family dwelling(s)3,4

1,500 square feet or less ....................................................................... $ 3,288/ea

1,501 to 5,000 square feet ..................................................................... $ 4,932/ea

5,001 to 10,000 square feet ................................................................... $ 6,576/ea

10,001 or more square feet .................................................................... $ 8,220/ea

Regular calendar for more than 4 detached, single-family dwellings3,4

1,500 square feet or less ....................................................................... $ 16,440 or $1,096/ea5 whichever is greater

1,501 to 5,000 square feet ..................................................................... $ 24,660 or $1,644/ea5 whichever is greater

5,001 to 10,000 square feet ................................................................... $ 32,880 or $2,192/ea5 whichever is greater

10,001 or more square feet .................................................................... $ 41,100 or $2,740/ea5 whichever is greater

B. Attached residential development

2–4 units ........................................................................................................ $ 8,220

More than 4 units ........................................................................................... $ 10,960 or $822/ea6 whichever is greater

1 Additional fee for grading applies. (See Section III.A of this fee schedule.) 2 Additional fee will apply if the project is removed from the Administrative Calendar and rescheduled on the Regular Calendar. 3 “Square footage” includes gross internal floor space of main house and attached garage(s), plus any detached structures (e.g.,

guest houses, detached bedrooms, in-law units, garages, barns, art studios, tool sheds, and other outbuildings). 4 For developments that include residences of different sizes, the fee shall be based upon the average square footage of all the residences. 5 Not to exceed $109,600. 6 Not to exceed $54,800.

C. Additions or improvements

If not a waiver or an amendment to a previous coastal development permit, the fee is assessed according to the schedule in A. above (i.e., based on the calendar and/or size of the addition, plus the grading fee, if applicable).

If handled as an amendment to a previous coastal development permit, see Amendments (in Section III.F).

II. OFFICE, COMMERCIAL, CONVENTION, INDUSTRIAL (INCLUDING ENERGY FACILITIES), AND OTHER DEVELOPMENT NOT OTHERWISE IDENTIFIED IN THIS SECTION7,8,9

A. Based on Gross Square Footage

1,000 square feet (gross) or less ................................................................... $ 5,480

1,001 to 10,000 square feet (gross) ............................................................... $ 10,960



50,001 to 100,000 square feet (gross) ........................................................... $ 32,880

100,001 or more square feet (gross) .............................................................. $ 54,800

B. Based on Development Cost10

Development cost up to and including $100,000 ............................................ $ 3,288

$100,001 to $500,000 .................................................................................... $ 6,576

$500,001 to $2,000,000 ................................................................................. $ 10,960

$2,000,001 to $5,000,000 ............................................................................... $ 21,920

$5,000,001 to $10,000,000 ............................................................................ $ 27,400

$10,000,001 to $25,000,000 ........................................................................... $ 32,880

$25,000,001 to $50,000,000 ........................................................................... $ 54,800

$50,000,001 to $100,000,000......................................................................... $ 109,600

$100,000,001 or more ..................................................................................... $ 274,000

7 The fee shall be based on either the gross square footage or the development cost, whichever is greater. 8 Additional fee for grading applies. (See section III.A of this schedule). 9 Pursuant to section 13055(a)(5) of the Commission’s regulations, this category includes all development not otherwise

identified in this section, such as seawalls, docks and water wells. 10 Development cost includes all expenditures, including the cost for planning, engineering, architectural, and other services,

made or to be made for designing the project plus the estimated cost of construction of all aspects of the project both inside and outside the Commission’s jurisdiction.

III. OTHER FEES A. Grading11

50 cubic yards or less .................................................................................... $ 0

51 to 100 cubic yards ..................................................................................... $ 548

101 to 1,000 cubic yards ................................................................................ $ 1,096

1,001 to 10,000 cubic yards ........................................................................... $ 2,192

10,001 to 100,000 cubic yards ....................................................................... $ 3,288

100,001 to 200,000 cubic yards ..................................................................... $ 5,480

200,001 or more cubic yards .......................................................................... $ 10,960

B. Lot line adjustment12 ...................................................................................... $ 3,288

C. Subdivision13

Up to 4 new lots ............................................................................................. $ 3,288/ea

More than 4 new lots ...................................................................................... $ 13,152 plus $1,096 for each lot above 4

D. Administrative permit ...................................................................................... $ 2,74014

E. Emergency permit .......................................................................................... $ 1,09615

F. Amendment

Immaterial amendment .......................................................................... $ 1,096

Material amendment .................. [50% of fee applicable to underlying permit if it were submitted today]

$ ___________ (calculate fee)

G. Temporary event which requires a permit pursuant to Public Resources Code section 30610(i)

If scheduled on administrative calendar…………………………………… $ 1,096

If not scheduled on administrative calendar………………………………. $ 2,740

H. Extension16 and Reconsideration

Single-family residence .......................................................................... $ 548

All other development ............................................................................ $ 1,096

11 The fee for grading is based on the cubic yards of cut, plus the cubic yards of fill. 12 A lot line adjustment is between adjoining parcels where the land taken from one parcel is added to an adjoining parcel, and

where a greater number of parcels than originally existed is not thereby created. 13 The fee is charged for each parcel created in addition to the parcels that originally existed. 14 Additional fee will apply if the project is removed from the Administrative Calendar and rescheduled on the Regular Calendar. 15 The emergency application fee is credited toward the follow-up permit application fee. 16 If permit extension is objected to by the Commission and the application is set for a new hearing, then a new application fee is

required, based on type of development and/or applicable calendar.

I. Request for continuance

1st request ............................................................................................. No charge

Each subsequent request (where Commission approves the continuance) ....................................

$ 1,096

J. De minimis or other waivers ........................................................................... $ 548

K. Federal Consistency Certification17 [The fee is assessed according to sections I, II, and III, above] ......................

$ _____

L. Appeal of a denial of a permit by a local government18 [The fee is assessed according to sections I, II, and III, above] .....................

$ _____

M. Written Permit Exemption ............................................................................... $ 274

N. Written Boundary Determination .................................................................... $ 274

O. Coastal Zone Boundary Adjustment ............................................................... $ 5,480 TOTAL SUBMITTED $

TO BE COMPLETED BY STAFF SUBMITTED FEE VERIFIED BY: DATE:

IS SUBMITTED AMOUNT CORRECT?

Yes. Applicant has correctly characterized the development, and payment is appropriate.

Applicant did not fill out form, thus staff has marked the form to compute the fee, and applicant has paid fee.

No. Why?

____________________________

____________________________

REFUND OR ADDITIONAL FEE REQUIRED? (STATE REASON)

Refund amount ( ___________________________________________________________________________ ) Additional fee amount ( ___________________________________________________________________________ )

REMINDER: RECORD FEE PAYMENT IN PERMIT LOG FINAL FEE VERIFIED BY: (TO BE COMPLETED AFTER COMMISSION ACTION) DATE:

17 Fees for federal consistency items will be assessed now that the Commission has received approval from NOAA to amend the

California Coastal Management Program. 18 Pursuant to Public Resources Code section 30602 or 30603(a)(5).

Appendix I

LACDPH Permit References

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES ♦ DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH

Cross Connection & Water Pollution Control Program 5050 Commerce Drive, Baldwin Park, CA 91706

Tel (626) 430-5290 FAX (626) 813-3025

REQUIREMENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION AND PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION FOR SAFE REUSE OF RAINFALL / RUN-OFF, NON-POTABLE CISTERN

WATER AND URBAN RUN-OFF WATER (Rev. 09.21.09)

Rain barrels and cisterns are methods of storing rainfall and run-off on-site for landscape irrigation purposes. In semi-arid Los Angeles County, rainfall, run-off and the reuse of captured rainfall could greatly reduce the amount of water that must be imported. For this reason, there should be no reasonable impediment to storing and reusing rainfall and run-off, provided it can be done safely while protecting the health of the public. As a result of increased interest and initiative to use untreated rainfall/non-potable cistern water and urban run-off water for onsite landscape irrigation purposes, the Department of Public Health (the Department) has found it necessary to develop the following requirements for water pipeline construction, installation and safe re-use of “non-potable” water supplies. The purpose of these requirements is to provide the necessary procedures for obtaining approval for the installation of pipeline which will convey untreated rainfall, non-potable cistern water and /or urban run-off water for irrigation purposes. Moreover, it is intended to establish requirements for the protection of the potable domestic water supply as well as public health. PLEASE NOTE: Presently within the County of Los Angeles there are no regulatory definitions of rainfall, non-potable cistern water or urban run-off that would categorize them as either recycled / reclaimed water or other regulated water source. These types of non-potable water sources are categorized within the scope of “alternate non-potable water supply”. Therefore rainfall/run-off, non-potable cistern and urban run-off water, for the purposes of these requirements shall be recognized by the Department (pending adoption of proposed regulation) as “alternate non-potable water supply sources” and regulations pertaining to the protection of the domestic water supply in relation to an “alternate non-potable water supply sources” shall apply. The following requirements are intended to focus on projects which integrate below grade pipelines, pumps and large capacity holding tanks. They are not intended for application to rain barrels that collect rainfall / run-off water from residential rooftops, gravity fed or hand-held hoses. For the residential types of projects which do not incorporate below grade plumbing, pumps and large capacity tanks, please contact your local City Building & Safety Department. Treatment systems for rain, gray and urban run-off water for reuse in toilet flushing have been proposed but are not covered within these requirements. Please contact the Department at (626) 430-5270 for information regarding treatment strategies and reuse. These requirements apply to collection and reuse for on-site purposes only. Distribution of collected rainfall/non-potable cistern and urban run-off to off-site properties shall be evaluated by State Department of Public Health ( CADPH) in conjunction with State Regional Water Control Board (RWQCB).

REQUIREMENTS FOR THE INSTALLATION AND PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION FOR SAFE RAINFALL/RUN-OFF, NON-POTABLE CISTERN WATER AND URBAN RUN-OFF REUSE Page 2

2

DEFINITIONS: Alternate non-potable water supply is a non-potable source of water which includes gray water, rainfall/run-off non-potable cistern water, urban run-off, on site treated water and recycled/reclaimed water. Cistern (non-potable) refers to a receptacle or rainwater catchment system for storing water, usually underground, which captures non-potable water run-off for the purposes of reusing the water for irrigation purposes. Non-potable cisterns are distinct from potable cisterns that are installed and managed as potable water reservoirs/storage. Gray water refers to untreated waste water which has not come into contact with toilet waste. Gray water includes used water from bathtubs, showers, bathroom wash basins, clothes washing machines and laundry. It does not include waste water from kitchen sinks, photo lab sinks, dishwashers or laundry water from soiled diapers. Non-Potable Water refers to water which is not intended for human consumption. Two distinct variations are inclusive in this definition: Non-potable water from a potable source, via a dedicated backflow prevention device vs. untreated non-potable water from collection methods that never originated from a potable source. The term non-potable water is all-inclusive with respect to the various non-potable water supplies mentioned within these requirements. Onsite Water Supervisor refers to that person appointed, as provided for under Title 17, Section 7586, California Code of Regulations who is responsible for the protection of the potable water system from cross connections. This person is responsible for installation, operation, maintenance of the rain-fall / non-potable cistern water and potable water systems, prevention of potential hazards, implementation of these requirements, and coordination the Department. Potable Water refers to water which is fit for consumption by humans and other animals. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) identifies contaminants that may adversely affect public health that occur in drinking water with a frequency and at levels that pose a threat to public health. The EPA establishes maximum contaminant levels (MCLs) (both biological and chemical) permissible in drinking water. These MCLs become enforceable standards. Rainfall/ Non-potable Cistern Water refers to the harvested rainwater/storm water collected within a cistern from a rain event and/or urban run-off. Cisterns in Los Angeles County may serve as a secondary source of water for applications that do not require potable water, such as landscape irrigation, which can dramatically lower the potable water demand and reducing off-site rainfall run-off. Recycled / Reclaimed Water refers to tertiary-treated water produced from the three-stage treatment of municipal wastewater. Recycled / reclaimed water is allowable for full-body human contact but not for direct human consumption. Purple pipe is the designated pipeline material specifically allowed to convey tertiary treated recycled / reclaimed water. Other non-potable water sources as mentioned in these requirements shall not use purple pipe. Untreated stored rainfall/run-off should not be confused with tertiary treated wastewater, defined in Title 22 of the California Code of Regulations.


3

Urban run-off – refers to non-potable water from a dry weather run-off catchment system used for the collection of water run-off which does not necessarily come from a rain event. PROCEDURES: PLAN REVIEW AND SUBMISSION 1. Plans and specifications for the rainfall/non-potable cistern water capture, distribution,

use and operational practices shall be submitted for review and approval to the Department prior to implementation. The applicable Building & Safety Departments having jurisdiction shall also be notified for approval.

2. County of Los Angeles will review and approve the plans to ensure safe re-use

practices, correct labeling of pipelines and appropriate separation from potable water supplies and sanitary sewer lines.

3. Prior to commencing new or retrofit construction the contractor or installer shall contact

the Department to arrange for inspection of all on-site rainfall/non-potable cistern water and potable water work. No excavation or open trench may be backfilled without first securing the Department approval. If any piping, rainfall/non-potable cistern water or potable water is installed prior to plan check approval and/or inspection, all or any portion of the system may be required to be exposed and corrected as necessary.

4. The rainfall/cistern water system shall be constructed in conformance with potable water

system construction standards and in accordance with all other governing codes, rules and regulations.

5. Unused or abandoned potable water lines are to be severed as close to water mains as

practical, capped and a four-foot section of abandoned line removed and the cap cemented under the Department’s supervision.

REQUIRED SEPARATION OF LINES In order to minimize construction accidents resulting in pipeline breaks, which may pollute the domestic water supply or accidental cross-connections between rainfall/non- potable cistern water and potable water systems, maximum attainable separation of non- potable cistern water lines and potable water lines is required.

Parallel Construction: There shall be at least a four foot (4’) separation for all pressure mains, all distances measured from pipeline outside diameter. In restricted areas where 4 foot separations cannot be met, the use of sleeved pipe is required.

Cross-Over Construction: Perpendicular pipeline installation is set at a one foot (1’) separation, with potable above rainfall/non-potable cistern water, and one full pipe length centered over crossing.

Alternative Cross-Over construction (distance not maintained): Either the rainfall/non-potable cistern water may be sleeved with the same class piping (usually schedule 40 PVC) for one full pipe length (minimum four feet) centered over the cross-over.


4

Existing On-site piping – To the extent feasible, maximum separation of rainfall/non-potable cistern water and potable water lines shall be practiced upon system addition or modification. IDENTIFICATION OF LINES All rainfall/non-potable cistern water main lines, valve boxes and appurtenances shall be identified to clearly distinguish between non-potable cistern water and potable water systems. Specific wording on identification tape shall be required. Evaluation shall be on a case-by-case basis, but with the understanding that the minimum requirement for pipeline identification is per the Uniform Plumbing Code. The following identification tape will be accompanied with respective tags of the same colors and wording for all valve boxes, vaults, control valves, quick couplers, outlets and related appurtenances, if applicable.

a. POTABLE WATER – All potable water lines shall be installed in accordance with the Uniform Plumbing Code and all other governing codes, rules and regulations. Buried potable water lines shall be identified by continuous tape with lettering on three inch (3’’) minimum width green or blue tape with one inch black lettering bearing the continuous wording “Potable Water”. Identification tape shall be permanently affixed to the pipeline at five foot intervals atop all horizontal piping, laterals and mains. Identification tape shall extend to all valve boxes and/or vaults, exposed piping and hydrants. Identification tape is not necessary for extruded colored PVC with continuous wording “Potable Water” printed in contrasting lettering on opposite sides of the pipe.

b. RAINFALL/NON-POTABLE CISTERN WATER – All rainfall/non-potable

cistern water lines (pressure/non-pressure) shall be identified by continuous lettering on three inch (3’’) minimum width YELLOW tape with one inch black lettering bearing the continuous wording “Caution – Non-potable Cistern Water, Subsurface Irrigation Only” permanently affixed at five foot intervals atop all horizontal piping, laterals and mains. Identification tape shall extend to all valve boxes and/or vaults and exposed piping.

c. NON-POTABLE WATER – All non-potable irrigation/industrial water lines

(pressure/non-pressure) shall be identified by continuous lettering on three inch (3’’) minimum width yellow tape with one inch black lettering bearing the continuous wording “Non-Potable Water” permanently affixed at five foot intervals atop all piping. Identification tape shall extend to all valve boxes and/or vaults, exposed piping, hydrants and quick couplers.

d. Tags, respective of each water supply, shall be identified with the appropriate wording on both sides with the inclusion of a universal symbol.

OPERATIONAL GUIDELINES AND SPECIFICATIONS

1. Irrigation systems utilizing untreated rain-fall/non-potable cistern water shall only be by means of *subsurface irrigation. Misting or spraying into the air is prohibited. Irrigation practices shall be controlled to prevent surface runoff from lands owned or controlled by the user. (*For above grade spray irrigation, the level of treatment would necessitate Title 22 Standards to ensure the removal of pathogens. Please contact the Department for more information).


5

2. Any pipeline other than potable water that is installed within a structure shall conform to all building code standards and shall be “barber shop” wrapped with the respective continuous identification tape and without any interconnections with the potable water system.

3. Gray water systems, rain-fall/runoff non-potable cistern systems and recycled water

systems are not to be interconnected. Each shall be installed as stand alone systems completely separate from one another. Gray water systems are directly connected to the sewage system. Rain-fall/non-potable cisterns are not to be directly connected to a sewer system. For gray water installation requirements refer to California Plumbing Code 2007, Chapter 16/Appendix G (DWR).

4. Cisterns/storage vessels shall be adequately covered to prevent mosquito breeding.

5. Contact with untreated rainfall/non-potable cistern should be kept to a minimum.

6. Deteriorated or inadequately protected water well casings shall be protected against

contamination by untreated rainfall/non-potable cistern water by correcting these physical deficiencies. Surface infiltration of untreated rainfall/run-off is allowed provided it occurs at least 10 feet from an unprotected foundation structure, there is a least 10 feet of clearance to the seasonal high ground water table, and it occurs at least 100 feet from a water supply well.

7. An On-Site Water Supervisor shall be appointed as provided for under Title 17, Section

7586, California Code of Regulations. Authorizations for any piping changes or additions to either the potable or recycled wastewater systems shall be subject to review and approval by the water supervisor. The name and position of this individual shall be reported to the water purveyor and to the Department.

8. As-built plans shall be prepared and updated as necessary by the user showing the

location of rainfall /non-potable cistern water and potable water system piping.

9. To prevent secondary exposure to rainfall/non-potable cistern water, hose bibbs and quick couplers shall not be permitted in order to prevent both the unauthorized use of said water supply and secondary exposure of untreated non-potable water supply. Quick-couplers are presently not allowed on non-potable cistern systems.

10. A potable water source may be connected via an approved backflow prevention device

to provide a back up water source to a non-potable water cistern. A non-potable water backup supply line from a potable source via an approved backflow prevention device can be directly connected to the rain-fall/non-potable cistern discharge line to the irrigation system. Gray water systems cannot be directly connected to a potable supply with or without a backflow prevention device, (air gaps are excluded) (2007 California Plumbing Code, Section 603.3.5). Air gaps are the only method as a potable water make-up to a gray water system.

11. A pressure test/cross-connection test shall be performed to confirm the physical

separation of the storm water/cistern water and potable water systems. Said testing shall be performed in conjunction with the Water Purveyor and this Department and conducted before the introduction of rainfall/non-potable cistern water.


6

12. The Department shall refer all plans proposing to install a cistern to the following agencies prior to construction:

• Los Angeles County Cross-Connection & Water Pollution Control Program to: initiate the plan proposal; conditional approval; interim construction inspections and final approval.

• The City or County Building & Safety Department for construction permits

and inspections (Building Codes).

• The local water purveyor regarding required backflow protection at the potable/city water service connection(s).

• The Mosquito Abatement District for conditions of approval and to register

the cistern tank.

• The City or County Public Works Department for cistern tank overflow discharge requirements.

CROSS REFERENCE: California Health & Safety Code 116800-116820 California Code of Regulations, Title 22, Div. 4, Chapter 3 Los Angeles County Code – Title 11 and Title 28 2007 California Plumbing Code, Chapter 6, Appendix G & J.

Appendix J

LACFCD Connection Permit References

LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS

LOS ANGELES COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT

GUIDELINES

FOR

CONNECTION PERMITS

CONSTRUCTION DIVISION - PERMITS AND SUBDIVISIONS SECTION

REVISED JANUARY 2007

CONTENTS

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 CONNECTION GUIDELINES QUICK REFERENCES 2

I. PERMIT APPLICATION 3

II. FEES 3 A. Plan Checking fees 3 B. Inspections fees 3 C. Amendments to permit 3 D. Extend permit time 3

III. AS-BUILT PLANS 3 IV. RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP 3

V. SUBMIT FOUR OR SEVEN (If Army Corps of Engineers Facility) SETS OF PLANS SHOWING THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION 4 VI. HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC DATA 6 VII. HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS 6 VIII. HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS 7 IX. SUSMP REQUIREMENTS 7 X. NON-STORM WATER DISCHARGES 7 CONCRETE REMOVAL NOTES 8 EXHIBIT “A” CONNECTION PERMIT WATER QUALITY AGREEMENT 9

-1-

CONNECTION GUIDELINES QUICK REFERENCES To expedite the process for obtaining a permit to connect to a Los Angeles County Flood Control District (LACFCD) facility, please submit the following:

I. Permit application.

II. Plan checking and inspection fees.

III. Submit four copies of the LACFCD as-built plans with the sketch of the correct location for the

proposed connection.

IV. Submit two copies of the LACFCD right-of-way map.

V. Submit four collated and stapled sets of final construction plans, three additional sets if connecting to U.S. Army Corps of Engineers channels.

VI. Submit a copy of the LACFCD existing hydrology and hydraulic data for the facility.

VII. Two sets of signed and stamped hydrology calculations.

VIII. Two sets of signed and stamped hydraulic calculations.

IX. If applicable, submit the Exhibit "A" Connection Permit Water Quality Agreement and two sets of

SUSMP calculations. See page 6 for the requirements.

X. For non-storm water discharges, submit a copy of the NPDES permit from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board.

NOTES: • Before submitting an application for a permit, make sure the system you are connecting to is maintained

by LACFCD. • If connecting to a Private Drain (PD) or Miscellaneous Transfer Drain (MTD), make sure that the system

has been transferred and is being maintained by LACFCD. If the system is not transferred yet, this section may not issue the permit and you may instead need to obtain a letter of "non-objection" from our Building & Safety/Land Development Division.

• Additional comments or requirements may be applicable and not covered in these guidelines based on

your proposal. • Restamped and signed copies of the Department's "as-built" or final construction plans that have been

altered for additional drainage connections are not acceptable for Los Angeles County Department of Public Works permit purposes. (The only stamp on the plan must be the design engineer's stamp that is applying for the permit.)

• Plans that are required to be reviewed by other divisions of the Department of Public Works and/or the

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers will be forwarded to them by this Section. Please do not contact other divisions directly.

-2-

I. PERMIT APPLICATIONS The owner shall be the person (permittee) liable to maintain the proposed connection unless other arrangements are clearly stated on the permit application. Print the complete street address and telephone number on the permit application of the owner and the applicant (agent of the owner). Please print legibly. II. FEES Listed below are some of the plan check and inspection fees set by County Ordinance for connections. A. Plan checking fees: 8" pipe diameter or less $ 50 8" to 24" pipe diameter $100 over the 24" pipe diameter $250 minor modification $ 50 B. Inspection fees: 8" pipe diameter or less $200 (each) over 8" to 24" $300 (each) over 24" to 33" $450 (each) over 33" to 60" $600 (each) over 60" $875 (each) flap gate $ 75 (each) minor inspection $ 75 (each) one C.B. relocation $200 two C.B. relocations $275 (same intersection) three C.B. relocations $375 (same intersection) four C.B. relocations $475 (same intersection) five C.B. relocations $550 (same intersection) abandon C.B. $ 75 C. Amendment to permit $ 50 D. Extend permit expiration date $ 25 • The permit writer will verify the actual fees upon reviewing the plans. A deposit is required for services

not listed above and for complicated services. Actual costs will be charged. • Only one plan check fee will be charged; it will be based on the largest connection size or most

extensive activity. The inspection fee is the sum of all the connections and other activities to be authorized, as shown on the plans.

• • III. AS-BUILT PLANS A copy of the as-built plans showing LACFCD facility may be obtained from the Plan Room in the basement of the Department of Public Works. Please sketch accurately the correct location for the proposed connection to the LACFCD’s storm drain or channel system on a copy of the as-built plans. The sketch should indicate all the appropriate junction structures and any other pertinent connection data. IV. RIGHT-OF-WAY MAP A copy of the right-of-way map showing LACFCD facility may be obtained from the Mapping & Property Division on the 10th floor of the Department of Public Works.

V. SUBMIT FOUR OR SEVEN (if Army Corps of Engineers facility) SETS OF FULL SIZE (24” x 36”) PLANS SHOWING THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION: A. Show a vicinity map with the Thomas Guide page number and grid. Show the “North” arrow,

scale(s) used, and elevations on the profile view(s). B. Plan sheets should be wet stamped and signed by a professional Civil/Structural Engineer

licensed to practice in California. C. Show the outline of the storm drain and/or channel with dashed lines and label the mainline of

the facility with the LACFCD or the Army Corps of Engineers name. D. Show the centerline and indicate the mainline storm drain Stations at all points of work that

affect LACFCD facilities. NOTE: Midline connections to connector pipes are not allowed. E. Show the dimensioned property and right-of-way lines. Label the LACFCD right-of-way lines as

either fee or easement. F. Plans stamped "preliminary" or "not for construction" etc. are not acceptable for permit

issuance. G. You must show the full plan, profile, details, and dimensions for all proposed connections. H. Label the station of the proposed line at the connection (centerline intersection). Show the D-

load for reinforced concrete pipe (RCP). For smaller connections (D<12"), use Cast Iron Pipe (CIP). Asphalt concrete pipe (ACP) and corrugated metal pipe (CMP) are not acceptable as connections to LACFCD facilities.

I. Label across the profile view who the proposed line is to be maintained by: LACFCD or owner. J. You must call out American Public Works Association (APWA, latest edition) Standard Plan(s)

(specify applicable variables, A, B, C, etc.) or the US Army Corps Standard Drawings for all connections. If not per Standard, show details and cross sections of the connection (allow additional time for review). Manuals for Standard Plans may be purchased at the Department of Public Works Cashier's Office on the west side of main lobby, (626) 458-6959.

K. Show a profile view with the following items:

• Allowable “Q” in cfs (across the top). • Velocity “v” in fps at the point of connection for 24-inch connections and above. • Label who the proposed line is to be maintained by; LACFCD or owner (across the bottom). • Show the HGL along the proposed connecting system. • Slope along the grade line. • Pipe size, length and strength.

L. Show a profile of the proposed line with the following items if it is to be maintained by LACFCD:

• Slope along the grade line (minimum 1.0% for connector pipes). • Size of pipe (minimum 18" for connector pipe and a minimum 24" for laterals and mainlines). • Use reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) and show the D-load.

NOTE: Remember to research utilities, verify utility location, and design accordingly (pothole if

necessary). Show all utilities affecting your design on the plan and profile view.

-4-

M. Most common types of connections and their requirements:

1. DIRECT CONNECTION TO MAINLINE:

Show the invert elevation of the mainline and of the proposed line at the point of connection. Also, show the elevation of the top of grate inlet on-site.

Show the slope along the grade line.

Show the existing hydraulic grade line (HGL) of the mainline.

Include the “Concrete Removal Notes”, found on page 8.

2. CONNECTION TO BACK OR SIDE OF CATCH BASIN:

• The point of discharge shall not be on the steps of the catch basin.

• Only one connection for a catch basin is allowed.

• Connections larger than 12-inches must show a detail of the connection or reference to an appropriate APWA Standard Plan and include calculations showing no adverse structural or hydraulic condition occurs in catch basin.

• Label the invert elevation of the catch basin, of the proposed line at the point of

connection, and of the top of curb at the catch basin.

• Label the elevation of the invert and the elevation of the top of the grate inlet on-site.

• Include the “Concrete Removal Notes”, found on page 8.

3. DIRECT CONNECTION TO A CHANNEL

• If the channel is constructed or maintained by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, submit two additional copies of the plans for their review. The type of connection must be per a Corps of Engineers Standard Junction Structure (show the structural detail on the drawings).

• Show the profile of the proposed pipe including the elevations at the top of channel, at

the invert of the channel, and at the invert of the proposed line. • A flapgate will be required when the elevation of the top of the proposed inlet is below

the top of the channel wall elevation. Use automatic flapgate inlet per LACDPW Std. Plan 3061-2.

• The Angle of Entry must meet Corps criteria. • For Corps channels, the soffit of the connector pipe should be a minimum of four feet

below the design water surface of the channel. • Include the “Concrete Removal Notes”, found on page 8.

-5-

4. CATCH BASIN RELOCATION REQUIREMENTS

• Need minimum 1% slope for proposed connector pipe. • Call out the size, length and D-load of the proposed pipes. • Indicate that the horizontal deflection angle of the connector pipe does not exceed 30

degrees on the plan (no angle point is allowed if the system is LACFCD-maintained). • If the horizontal deflection angle of the connector pipe is larger than 30 degrees, you

must use a manhole. (If a manhole is used, there will be an additional plan check and inspection fees).

• Only one angle point per connector pipe is allowed (no angle point is allowed if the

system is LACFCD-maintained). • Call out the abandonment of the connector pipe and the removal of the catch basin.

(Abandoned pipe must be sealed at both ends with 6" concrete or 8" brick and mortar and filled with dry inert material per APWA Standard Plan 381-1).

• If a different size (W or V-depth) or type of catch basin or a different local depression is

used, submit calculations to show the capacity of the proposed catch basin will meet the original design requirements. If an identical catch basin and local depression are used, hydrology and hydraulic calculations are not required. Show reference to all appropriate APWA Std. Plans (i.e., curb opening C.B. per APWA 300-2 and local depression at C.B. per APWA 313-1).

• Indicate the type of local depression and “H” value on the plans for proposed catch

basins. Be sure to dimension according to the latest edition of APWA Standard Plan 313.

• For catch basins located at corners of intersections, submit a plan that shows the

elevations of the top of curb and flow lines at BC and EC and mid-point of curb return and 50' beyond on both sides.

NOTE: If an existing catch basin is located at a low point (i.e. sump condition) and

proposed relocation of catch basin is to be upstream of the low point, no ponding of nuisance water will be allowed in the low point where the existing catch basin is removed.

VI. HYDROLOGY AND HYDRAULIC DATA A copy of the existing hydrology and hydraulic data for the existing system related to the proposed connection may be obtained from Mr. Amir Zandieh of the Design Division at (626) 458-7894 on the 6th floor of the Department of Public Works. Please circle or highlight the relevant data used in the submittal calculations on the copies of the LACFCD’s documents. VII. HYDROLOGY CALCULATIONS:

A. Non-tributary areas will be considered on an individual basis. In order for a diversion proposal to be approved, you must show conclusively that your proposal will not adversely affect our facility or area served by our facility.

B. Show a drainage area map of the proposed site with the existing subareas from the design

hydrology transposed on the drainage area map. Label the proposed area of your site in each existing subarea.

-6-

C. Show off-site "Q" affecting your proposed facility.

D. Compute the total allowable “Q” for the proposed site based on the allowable discharge “q” in

cfs per acre of the existing subareas from the design hydrology.

E. Compute the design hydrology peak flow rate “Q” for the proposed site using the hydrologic method in the “LACDPW Hydrology Manual 1991."

F. Design the proposed connection based on the smaller of the two “Q”s computed. The

maximum discharge "Q" that will be authorized is what was originally tabled from the proposed site to the LACFCD facility.

VIII. HYDRAULIC CALCULATIONS:

A. Identify the hydraulic grade line of the existing LACFCD facility.

B. Show hydraulic calculations for sizing the connections to limit discharge to the allowable "Q".

Use WSPG program or Manning’s equation assuming the pipe will be flowing full.

C. Show the effect of your proposed "Q" on the LACFCD facility’s hydraulic grade line. Review the effects of hydraulic grade line changes on catch basin systems as necessary.

D. Show the design capacity and flow velocity of the proposed pipe.

IX. SUSMP REQUIREMENTS For the following sites, submit the Exhibit “A” Connection Permit Water Quality Agreement and two sets of SUSMP calculations: � commercial developments greater than or equal to 1.0 acre � Parking lots 5,000 sq ft or more with 25 or more parking spaces � Automotive repair shops � Retail gasoline outlets � Restaurants � 10+ home subdivisions � single-family dwellings � Locations within or directly adjacent to or discharging to an environmentally sensitive area NOTES: SUSMP IS WAIVED IF THE CITY OR BUILDING & SAFETY HAS ALREADY APPROVED THEM. LETTER FROM CITY OR BUILDING & SAFETY IS REQUIRED

X. NON-STORM WATER DISCHARGES For non-storm water discharges, submit a copy of the NPDES permit from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board, which can be contacted at (213) 576-6600 or 320 West 4th Street, Suite 200; Los Angeles, CA 90013. O:\Section\Permits\Flood\Master\GUIDELINES - CONNECTION.doc

-7-

CONCRETE REMOVAL NOTES

WHERE REINFORCEMENT IS REQUIRED TO EXTEND THROUGH THE NEW JOINT, CONCRETE SHALL BE REMOVED IN THE FOLLOWING SEQUENCE.

1. A SAWCUT SHALL BE MADE ONE AND ONE-HALF INCHES DEEP AT THE REMOVAL

LIMITS. CARE SHALL BE EXERCISED IN SAWING AT THE REMOVAL LIMITS SO AS NOT TO CUT THE REINFORCING STEEL IN THE REMAINING SLAB. THE EXISTING REINFORCING STEEL SHALL BE RETAINED AND EXTENDED INTO THE NEW CONSTRUCTION AS INDICATED ON THE PLANS.

2. USING HANDHELD EQUIPMENT, THE CONCRETE SHALL BE CAREFULLY REMOVED

FOR THE FULL DEPTH OF THE WALL OR SLAB AND FOR A MINIMUM DISTANCE FORM THE SAWCUT EQUAL TO THE LONGEST EXTENSION OF THE EXISTING BARS TO BE EXTENDED INTO THE NEW CONSTRUCTION. THIS EXTENSION SHALL BE 30 BAR DIAMETERS, UNLESS OTHERWISE SHOWN.

3. EXISTING REINFORCEMENT SHALL BE CUT TO THE REQUIRED BAR EXTENSION.

4. THE REMAINING CONCRETE MAY BE REMOVED BY ANY SUITABLE METHOD UPON

APPROVAL OF THE ENGINEER, WHO SHALL BE THE SOLE JUDGE OF THE USE OF ANY CONCRETE REMOVAL EQUIPMENT. EXPLOSIVES, WRECKING BALL, OR OTHER SIMILAR DEVICES, WHICH ARE LIKELY TO DAMAGE THE CONCRETE TO BE LEFT IN PLACE, SHALL NOT BE USED.

-8-

EXHIBIT “A”

CONNECTION PERMIT WATER QUALITY AGREEMENT

I. The owner(s) of the property described below agree(s) to acknowledge for himself, his

heirs, successors of interests or assigns, the following:

• That the property maintains a connection permit with the Los Angeles County Department of Public Works for the privilege of connection and discharge of normal storm water only to the Department’s drainage facilities.

• That the quality of water discharged through said connection is the responsibility of the

owner(s).

• That in the event non-storm water/material is released through said connection, whether intentional or otherwise, the owner(s) shall effect immediate and appropriate corrective measures. The owner(s) shall report the incident and the measures taken to the Department of Public Works immediately by telephone, (888) CLEAN-LA or (888) 253-2652, to be followed by a detailed, written report. Corrective actions taken shall be subject to acceptance by the Department.

• To reimburse the County for the full cost of cleaning or repair of storm drain, water

course, or channel which may be necessary because of misuse of the storm drain connection.

• To give irrevocable consent to the representatives of the Department of Public Works

to enter the premises during normal business hours for the purpose of inspecting the drainage facilities at the site.

II. Property/Project Name and Site Address III. Legal Description of the Property IV. Name(s) and Notarized Signature(s) of Owner(s)

-9-

Appendix K

City of Santa Monica Permit References

July 23, 2008 Page 1 of 3 C:\Documents and Settings\Margaret.Talamantes\Desktop\Permit Forms\Summary of Select ROW Mgt Stds.doc

Department of Public Works

SSUUMMMMAARRYY OOFF SSEELLEECCTT RRIIGGHHTT--OOFF--WWAAYY MMAANNAAGGEEMMEENNTT SSTTAANNDDAARRDDSS

General – Application and Permit

• A permit is required for any excavation in the public right-of-way (PROW). An excavation is any activity in the PROW which disturbs the earth for the purpose of installing a utility or any other facility in or on the PROW whether done by trenching, digging, boring, tunneling, jacking, or any other method.

• The applicant is responsible for researching and properly indicating

existing PROW conditions, including the locations and depths of existing underground facilities.

• All permit fees must be paid prior to permit issuance and are non-

refundable. • No permit is valid without an Underground Service Alert (USA) ticket

number. The applicant agrees to comply with and be bound by all rules, regulations, and requirements of USA.

• Applicant shall coordinate work with other private or public utilities,

including but not limited to consideration of joint trenching.

• Applicant’s plans shall be drawn on a 1:20 scale, on the City’s standard 24” by 36” sheet, except excavations less than one block in length which can be done on an 11” by 17” sheet.

• Applicant shall submit a construction schedule showing start and end

dates at the time of application submittal.

• Hardship exemption – An applicant may apply to the Director of Environmental and Public Works Management for an exemption from any provision of the ordinance if it is unfeasible or constitutes an undue hardship.

Design


• The City shall approve the location of any aboveground facility associated

with the excavation. Aboveground facilities shall not obstruct vehicular or pedestrian access. Design shall be unobtrusive so as to minimize visual impact to the area and shall be neutral in color and integrated and compatible with surrounding structures or landscaping. Facilities can be designed to be unobtrusive by:

o Camouflaging o Landscaping o Screening o Undergrounding

Additional Antenna Requirements

• Antennas shall be camouflaged so that they do not materially change the aesthetic quality of the neighborhood and adjacent areas.

• Any mast arms shall be the minimal size allowed by State or Federal

regulations.

• The maximum height of any new or replacement pole shall not be substantially higher than the height of similar poles in the surrounding area.

• The final design of antennas installed on City-owned improvements shall

not substantially change the appearance of the improvement.

• Site Selection: Placement on private property is preferred. The applicant must exhaust private property options first. If a private property option is not feasible, then installations on existing infrastructure improvements, such as utility poles and streetlights are preferred.

General – Construction

• Public Notification: applicant shall provide written notification to all residents and businesses within five hundred (500) feet, not including the width of the PROW, of the work area seventy-two (72) hours prior to the start of work in a format approved by the City. Such notification shall also include the contact information for the person designated to handle complaints. The applicant further agrees to provide notice to the Civil Engineering and Architecture Division seventy-two (72) hours in advance of starting work.

• An excavation or wireless facility installation permit is valid for six months


and work must be executed within forty-five (45) days of permit issuance. Once the work has began, it must be completed with due diligence so as to not unduly obstruct the PROW.

• Permittee must supply an emergency contact list with a 24-hour contact

number prior to commencement of work.

• The contractor performing the work must maintain a copy of the permit at the location of work at all times.

• No work shall be executed in areas that may impact the urban forest

without consultation with a certified arborist, hired and paid for by the permittee, and the City’s Community Forester.

• Work sites must be maintained in a clean and neat manner. All excavated

material must be removed within eight (8) hours of deposit.

• Hazardous materials: All permittees shall be subject to hazardous material guidelines for handling, treating, and disposing of material; worker safety and training; notifications required by law; site remediation; and data collection. Permittee shall comply with all federal, state, and local laws regarding hazardous material. For purposes of this item, hazardous materials shall mean any substance of any kind that is deemed by any federal, state, county or local law to pose a hazard or potential hazard to health, safety, or the environment.

• Insurance: Permittee shall supply certification of insurance in accordance

with Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 7.06.511 et seq.

• The applicant will mark the completed installation as specified in Santa Monica Municipal Code Section 7.06.517.

• Immediately upon completion of the work, the permittee must notify James

Crampton at (310) 458-2201 extension 5888 or (310) 350-9738 for final inspection.

• Upon completion of the work, the applicant shall submit as-built drawings.

See http://codemanage.com/santamonica/index.php?topic=7-7_06 for further information.

January 06, 2013 Page 1 of 2

Department of Public Works Phone: (310) 458-8721 Fax: (310) 393-4425 E-Mail: [email protected]

EEXXCCAAVVAATTIIOONN PPEERRMMIITT AAPPPPLLIICCAATTIIOONN

All sections must be completed. Incomplete applications will be returned.

Date: ___________________

(1) Applicant Company: ___________________________________________________________

Contact Name: _________________________________________________________

Address: ___________________________________________________________

___________________________________________________________

Phone Number: _________________________________________________________

E-mail address: _________________________________________________________

Applicant City Business License Number (if applicable): _________________________

(2) Description of excavation work Job Site Address: _______________________________________________________

Work Description: _______________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________________

Total Length of Excavation: ____________ Total Width of Work Site: _____________

Check if related to a utility undergrounding requirement of a building permit?

(3) Utility Company on Behalf of Whom Application is filed Check box if same as (1) and skip to (4)

Company: _________________________________________________________

Contact Name: _________________________________________________________

Address: _________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________

Phone Number: _________________________________________________________

E-mail address: _________________________________________________________

For City Use: Permit Number: _______________

January 06, 2013 Page 2 of 2

(4) Contractor Performing Work Check if for “Bidding Purposes Only” and skip to section (5). Check box if same as (1) and skip to (5)

Company: _________________________________________________________

Contact Name: _________________________________________________________

Address: _________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________

Phone Number: _________________________________________________________

E-mail address: _________________________________________________________

Santa Monica Business License Number: ____________________________________

(5) The following documents must be attached or this application will be rejected: Construction Site Plan showing all existing & all proposed utilities with dimensions. Proof of Santa Monica Business License (a copy of the receipt is acceptable). Proof of insurance in compliance with Santa Monica accepted minimum coverage. Santa Monica General Notes for Excavation in the Public R.O.W. and Detail SM15.

Insurance requirements, Santa Monica Standard Notes and Detail SM15 can be found at: http://www.smgov.net/Departments/PublicWorks/ContentCivEng.aspx?id=8669

Traffic Control Plan

Non-Engineered Traffic Control Plan or Engineered Traffic Control Plan - If previously submitted: TTCP#________ REV#___

Additional information regarding Traffic Control Plans can be found at: http://www.smgov.net/Departments/Transportation/transportation-management-content.aspx?id=17962

Applicant agrees to abide by all requirements of the Santa Monica Municipal Code and conditions set forth on the permit. Failure to comply may result in permit revocation and/or civil penalties. Signed: ___________________________ Title: _______________________________ Print Name: _______________________ Date: ______________________________ For City Use:

Approved By: Approval Date: STP/TEAM: ______________________

____________

CE: _____________________________

____________

PW Fee: _________________________

http://www.smgov.net/Departments/PublicWorks/ContentCivEng.aspx?id=8669

http://www.smgov.net/Departments/Transportation/transportation-management-content.aspx?id=17962