los altos nitrification action plan
TRANSCRIPT
Quality. Service. Value. 1
California Water ServiceOctober 24, 2018
Los Altos Nitrification Action PlanGina Cyprych, Water Quality Program Manager
Quality. Service. Value.®
Quality. Service. Value. 2
Presentation Outline
• Project overview• Data analysis
• Observed trends in storage tanks:– Regional trends– Total chlorine, total ammonia, and nitrite– Temperature
• Observed trends in distribution system:– Total chlorine residual
• Nitrification action plan • Monitoring procedures• Standard operating procedures• Capital investments and infrastructure changes
Quality. Service. Value. 3
Cal Water Los Altos District
• Formed in 1931; serves Los Altos and parts of Los Altos Hills, Cupertino, Mountain View, and Sunnyvale
• Uses combination of local groundwater and purchased water; our purchased water, which is treated surface water from the Santa Clara Valley Water District (SCVWD), comes from SCVWD reservoirs and San Joaquin-Sacramento River Delta
• Includes 297 miles of pipeline, 65 booster pumps, and 46 storage tanks, which serves 70,000+ residents
Quality. Service. Value.®
DATA COLLECTION, PROCESSING, AND
ANALYSIS
Quality. Service. Value.®
Quality. Service. Value.®
Data Processing
Quality. Service. Value. 7
Anomalous Data Identified
• Data points greater than 0.5 mg/L NO2-N:• Data excluded from
current data analysis• Not included for
following reasons:– Lack of corrective
action on manual recording worksheet
– Significant drop in concentration at next sample collection date
Quality. Service. Value.
Flow of Storage Tanks Evaluated
8
SCVWD Water
Covington
Low Zone
Cupertino GrangerFa
rndo
n
STA 7
STA8
STA10
STA28
STA 41
18” main
24” main
STA 9
STA 33
STA 42 STA 114
STA 113
STA 14
STA 19
Tantau-VallcoSTA 35
STA 23
Northwest
South
West
Quality. Service. Value.
Regional Trends in Storage Tanks
9
West
• STA 28
• STA 41
• STA 10
Northwest• STA 113• STA 114
South• STA 42• STA 9
All regions exhibit seasonal increases in nitrite concentration, but some problematic tanks experience increases outside of the seasonal high periods.
Quality. Service. Value.®10
Example: Interrelated trends for total chlorine, ammonia, and nitrite in storage tanks
• STA 28 (T2) in the West area
• Observation: Low total chlorine residuals consistent with spikes in nitrite
Low chlorineLow ammoniaHigh nitrite
Higher chlorineHigher ammoniaLow nitrite
Quality. Service. Value.®11
Example: Relationship of elevated temperature and nitrification in storage tanks
• STA 33 (T2) in the South area
• Trend: Higher temperatures in summer and fall months exacerbate AOB growth and result in higher nitrite
Quality. Service. Value.®12
• STA 7 (T1) in West area
• Trend: Nitrite present in source water coincides with (but is not required for) occurrence of nitrite in downstream tanks
Example:Nitrite in source water entering storage tanks
Quality. Service. Value.®13
Average Cl2:NH3-N ratios in storage tanks
• Ideal Cl2:NH3-N ratio = 5:1 (no free ammonia present)
• Trend: Most tanks operated at around a Cl2:NH3-N ratio = 4.5:1; large error bars suggest that total chlorine residual concentration was not stable
Quality. Service. Value.®14
Distribution System Analysis
• Trends: Total chlorine residual concentration varied from 0.01 to 2.31 mg/L as Cl2, and averaged approximately 1.0 mg/L as Cl2.
Total Chlorine Residual at Selected TCR Sampling Sites
Quality. Service. Value.®15
Distribution system TCR sampling site summary
Trends: Nitrification may be a cause for low residual near problematic tanksOther factors such as blending of supply sources may also have an impact; not all wells are chloraminated, which may trigger nitrification depending on water quality
Highest likelihood of nitrification
Site(D) Region
Nearby Tanks(STA)
Average Total Cl2 Residual (mg/L as Cl2)
% of Samples with Total Cl2< 1.0 mg/L as Cl2
% of Samples with Total Cl2> 1.0 mg/L as Cl2
001 West - 1.5 12% 88%
011 West 10*, 41* 1.5 17% 83%
019 West 41* 1.3 27% 73%
023 North - 1.2 32% 68%
007 Northwest 114 1.2 38% 62%
015 Low Zone - 1.1 41% 59%
013 South 23, 42* 1.1 45% 55%
002 Low Zone - 0.9 48% 52%
029 Cupertino - 0.9 56% 44%
005 South 19, 33* 0.9 64% 36%
026 Northwest 113 0.7 74% 26%
003 Low Zone - 0.6 78% 22%
008 West 28* 0.5 84% 16%
024 South 9*, 33* 0.6 88% 12%
Quality. Service. Value.®16
Summary of Trends
Storage tanks• Nitrification in Los Altos District consistent with:
• Seasonally higher temperatures• Low total chlorine residuals
• Significant nitrification occurred at:• STA 28, 10, 41, 9, 42, 33
Distribution system / TCR sites• Average total chlorine residual concentration was 1.0 mg/L
as Cl2• Highest likelihood of nitrification at:
• D-005, D-008, D-024• Differences in blended source waters and disinfection may
contribute to low residual
Quality. Service. Value.®
NITRIFICATION ACTION PLAN DEVELOPMENT AND
OVERVIEW
Quality. Service. Value.®18
Occurrence of Nitrification Likely to be Reduced by…
• Mixing to promote minimal stratification
• Higher chlorine dosing (total chlorine residual at 2.5 mg/L) and optimization of Cl2:NH3-N ratio at 5:1
• Adding chloramination capability at every well• Increasing monitoring to respond more quickly and avoid
sharp spikes in nitrification
Quality. Service. Value.®19
Overview of Nitrification Action Plan
Three primary recommendations :
1. Establishment of nitrification triggers and corrective actions
2. Standard operating procedures for monitoring and maintenance
3. Potential capital investment options for long term control
Quality. Service. Value.®20
Recommended Changes to Monitoring Procedures1. Weekly monitoring of all elevated storage tanks with
additional twice weekly monitoring of six high frequency sites: STA 28, 10, 41, 9, 42, and 33
2. Implementation of formalized goals and triggers when responding to nitrification occurrences
3. Electronic storage and trending of monitoring data in an Excel spreadsheet to enable rapid response to trends
4. Use of trend analysis to adjust nitrification triggers and response actions for high frequency sites
Quality. Service. Value.®21
Data Trending Dashboard
Dashboard allows for: • Direct data upload from SL1000• Comparison of nitrite with different parameters
Quality. Service. Value.®22
Nitrification Triggers and Corrective Actions
• Baseline/goals• Average concentrations when nitrification is not
occurring
• Yellow triggers• Higher than baseline concentrations; nitrification is
about to occur
• Red triggers• Concentrations representative of residual degradation
and nitrification occurrence
Quality. Service. Value.®23
Selection of Trigger Values
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
1.4
1.6
1.8
0.000
0.050
0.100
0.150
0.200
0.250
0.300
0.350
Tota
l Chl
orin
e (m
g/L
as C
l 2)
Nitr
ite (m
g/L
NO
2-N)
NitriteChlorine
Total Cl2 ≈ 1.5 mg/L
Total Cl2 ≈ 1.0 mg/L
NO2 ≈ 0.010 mg/LNO2 ≈ 0.100 mg/L
Quality. Service. Value.®24
Nitrification Action Table
Site Parameter(units in mg/L) Goal
Triggers
Yellow Flag Red Flag
Storage TanksTotal Chlorine 2.5 1.5 1.0
Nitrite - N 0 – 0.010 0.010-0.030 > 0.030
* Background level of nitrite is 0.005 mg/L as N
Quality. Service. Value.®25
Decision Tree for Operational Response Actions
Quality. Service. Value.®26
Benefits of a 0.010 mg/L NO2-N Yellow Flag Trigger
STA Less than 0.005 0.005-0.010 0.010-0.050 0.050-0.100 >0.10010 T2 2 4 12 3 10
41 T1 9 6 20 10 8
28 T2 4 4 7 14 24
42 T2 18 1 7 3 18
9 T1 19 4 11 8 8
33 T2 21 2 5 8 7
183 occurrences*94 occurrences*
* Based upon data from January 2016 to September 2017
Quality. Service. Value.®27
Options for Capital Investment
Objective: Achieve adequate mixing to avoid thermal stratification and excess free ammonia and to achieve a decreased overall water age
1. Mechanical mixer at tanks with recurring nitrification; if PAX mixer at STA 42 is successful, consider also implementing at:
• STA 28 • STA 10• STA 41• STA 9• STA 33
Quality. Service. Value.®28
2. Booster chlorination for trimming free ammonia
Granger
Farndon
STA 7
STA8
STA10
STA28
STA 41
18” main
24” main
STA 9
STA 33
STA 42
STA 114
STA 113
STA 14
STA 19
STA 35
STA 23
Identified Problematic Tanks
Potential Booster Chlorination Locations
Quality. Service. Value.®
3. Pilot project: use of ultraviolet lights in storage tanks
29
• LADWP study found that low-intensity UVA radiation was shown to inhibit the growth of nitrifying bacteria
Source: White, Brian; Adams, Martin. Battling Nitrification with Blacklights, Opflow. February 2010.
Mount Washington tank – capacity of 542,000 gallons
Quality. Service. Value.®30
4. Uniform chloramination of wells
Well Disinfection TypeGranger ChloramineFarndon Chloramine
Tantau-Vallco ChloramineCovington Chloramine
017-01 Chloramine006-01 Chloramine021-01 Chloramine018-01 Chloramine027-01 Chloramine034-01 Chloramine119-01 Chloramine119-02 Chloramine030-01 Chloramine (in process)031-01 Chloramine (in process)001-02 None015-01 None025-01 None032-01 None039-01 None104-02 None115-01 None116-01 None121-02 None123-01 None
Data showed relatively low total chlorine residual in distribution system
• Potential for nitrification is influenced by changes in water chemistry and microbiology
• Elimination of blending of monochloraminatedand undisinfected waters is likely to improve degradation of total chlorine residual in distribution system
Recommendation: Apply chloramine disinfection at all wells to avoid any detrimental impacts of blending on disinfectant residual and nitrification
Disinfection at Wells in Los Altos District
Quality. Service. Value.®31
Next Steps
Cal Water• Implementation of nitrification monitoring triggers,
modified monitoring / operational procedures• Review of short- and long-term options for capital
investment• Quarterly review meetings
• District training on action levels and chloramination
Hazen• Modification of Excel dashboard for streamlined use with
Hach SL-1000• Workshop for operators on use of Hach SL-1000 and
electronic data upload
Quality. Service. Value.®
Acknowledgements
• LAS District staff
• Hazen and Sawyer• Nicole Blute and Luke Wang
Quality. Service. Value. 33Quality. Service. Value.®
Questions?Thank you for your attention.