Longwood University Professional Education Unit

2009-2010 Annual Report

2009-2010 Teacher Prep Entry Program Number GPA & Test Score

Art 6 3.20

Bio 2 2.70

Elem 93 3.12

Elem-Mid 15 2.98

English 9 3.30

History 12 3.18

Math 3 3.50

Middle 9 3.13

Music 4 3.25

PHETE 6 2.78

SPED 33 3.17

Theatre 3 2.87

Unit 198 3.13

2009 Disposition Assessments - Overall

CF9A

CF9B

CF9C

CF9D

CF9E

CF9F

CF9G

CF9H

CF9I

CF9J

CF9K

CF9L

Art 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Biology 4.0 2.5 2.0 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.0 4.0 2.0 3.5 2.0Elementary 4.8 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.7 4.8 4.8Elementary-Middle 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0English 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0History 4.7 4.3 4.2 4.6 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.4 4.7 4.2 4.6 4.2Middle 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Music 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0Physical Educ 3.6 3.9 3.4 3.9 4.4 4.1 4.6 3.9 4.6 3.7 4.0 4.0Special Educ 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0 5.0

Dispositions indicate some variance by program area. Please note your individual program areas for response.

Unit Disposition Data for Student Teaching

CF9A CF9B CF9C CF9D CF9E CF9F CF9G CF9H CF9I CF9J CF9K CF9L

Overall Averages 4.78 4.68 4.58 4.73 4.80 4.73 4.83 4.65 4.75 4.55 4.58 4.58

While this data indicates a disposition rating of 4.55-4.78 out of a possible 5. Programs responded to individual student data on an as needed basis.

Unit Dispositions for Early Clinical

CF9A CF9B CF9C CF9D CF9E CF9F CF9G CF9H CF9I CF9J CF9K CF9LOverall Averages 3.93 3.57 3.43 3.29 4.29 4.36 4.07 3.57 4.29 3.57 3.71 3.71

You will note in comparison of this with the preceding slide that the Unit appears to show growth in dispositions as the candidates mature during the ITP process. Please review your program folders for individual student data.

Diversity Data regarding Candidate exposure in Clinical Placement

Working with Student With Special Needs% of Candidates working with Students With Physical Impairments a 504 Plan

34%

% of Candidates working with an IEP 76%% of Candidates working with ESL 29%% of Candidates working with Gifted 38%

Working with Diverse Students% of Candidates working with African American Students

92%

% of Candidates working with Native American/Alaska Native Students

5%

% of Candidates working with Hispanic Students

53%

% of Candidates working with Asian Students 31%% of Candidates working with Diverse Students (Aggregate)

92%

Please note the overall diversity of our partnership sites (available in Can Teach in the OPS folder.

Percentages of Field Experiences by Category Types

Unit Demographic Data – Spring 2010

CANDIDATE ETHNICTY n % Average GPAAmerican Indian or Alaska Native 5 1% 2.77Asian 6 1% 2.93Black or African American 38 4% 2.68Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0 0% -Hispanic or Latino 19 2% 2.90White 832 89% 3.01Two or more races 32 3% -Race/ethnicity unknown 0 0% -Total 932 100% Female 801 86% 3.02Male 131 14% 2.82Total 932   Overall GPA 2.99  DIVERSITY Percentage 11%

Please note the next slide and your program folders for demographic data for individual programs

Diversity Percentage of the Unit and By Program 2010

DIVERSITY PERCENTAGE COMPARISONS BY PROGRAM

Overall Diversity 11%Art 16%CSDS 15%Elementary 8%Elem-Middle 14%English 7%History/SSE 10%Math 16%Middle 3%Modern Language 9%Music 14%PHETE 16%Science 13%Special Ed 6%Theatre 29%

Please review your program folders in Can Teach for individual program data.

Teacher Work Sample Data 2009-10The data indicate that 89% of the candidates scores 3’s or 4’s, Please consider your individual candidates and programs when reviewing this information

Spring 09 Fall 08 SP 08 Fall 07 SP 07 Fall 060%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

89%

62%

50%

14%

33%

45%

11%

38%

50%

74% 33%

36%

0% 0% 0%

12%

33%

18%

TWS Comparison Summery - Holistic Scores%4's %3's %'2 %1's

LU TWS CF Standard 2 - PlanningThe unit effectively had 100% of the candidates scoring 3’s on the planning standard.

CF1 CF2 CF3 CF4 CF5 LG1 LG2 LG3 LG40%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2010: LU CF Standard 2 - Planning

%3's %2's

TWS CF Standard 489+% candidates scored a 3 on standard 4

DFI1 DFI2 DFI3 DFI4 DFI5 DFI682%

84%

86%

88%

90%

92%

94%

96%

98%

100%

2010: CF Standard 4 - Implementation/ Management

%3's %2's

TWS CF Standard 5 Evaluation and Assessment100% or the unit candidates scored 3’s on this assessment of the teacher work sample

AP1 AP2 AP3 AP4 AP5 IDM1 IDM2 IDM3 ASL1 ASL2 ASL3 ASL40%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CF Standard 5 - Evaluation/Assessment

%3's %2's

TWS Data 2010The Unit candidates scored 100% 3’ with the diversity assessment.

CF1 CF2 CF3 CF4 CF5 LG3 AP5 DFI5 IDM2 ASL20%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

Spring 2010: CF Standard 8 - Diversity

%3's %2's

TWS – CF9 Dispositions The teacher work sample ratings for dispositions reflect the findings of our other data regarding candidates with in the unit. 99% of the candidates passed each TWS component.

RSE1 RSE2 RSE3 RSE4 RSE50%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

2010: CF Standard 9 - Dispositions

%3's %2's

Praxis and other Scores by program area

Program Name of Licensure # of test Takers %Passing

Elementary Education VRA 118 100

Elementary Education Elementary 120 100

Literacy and Culture VRA 20 100

English English 9 100

Middle School Middle School 13 84

Social Studies Social Studies 11 91

Music Music 3 100

Art Art 6 100

Foreign Language Foreign Language 0 NA

Science Biology 2 100

PHETE Health and PE 5 100

UNIT VCLA 174 100

Pass Rates on Content Licensure test for Initial Teacher Preparation 2009-10

GPA Comparison: Program & Unit data

NOTE: THIS DATA DOES NOT FOLLOW A PARTICULAR STUDENT GROUP THESE NUMBERS ARE SOLEY BASED ON THE TERM PRESENTED

TERM 07-08

Programs Enrollment Entry into Teacher Prep Completion

Unit 2.95 3.08 3.33

Art 2.95 3.23 2.50

Biology/Science 2.84 2.95 2.94

Business 3.09

CSDS 3.06 3.30

Elementary 3.00 3.02 3.30

Elem-Middle 3.06 3.12 3.32

English 2.84 3.43 3.38

History/SSE 2.93 3.17 3.60

Math 3.06 3.32

Middle 3.05 3.11 3.38

Modern Language 2.99 3.03 3.32

Music 2.80 2.60 3.60

Physical Ed 2.84 3.05 3.29

Special Ed. 3.00 3.03 3.32

Theatre 3.44 2.51 3.86

2009-10 TERMPrograms Enrollment Entry into Teacher Prep CompletionUnit 3.04 3.13 3.34Art 3.04 3.20 3.36Science (Biol/Chem) 2.90 2.70 2.97Elementary 3.12 3.12 3.36Elem-Middle 3.22 2.98 3.28English 3.24 3.30 3.65History/SSE 2.75 3.18 3.28Math 2.89 3.50 3.47Middle 2.96 3.13 3.43Modern Language 2.95Music 3.15 3.25 3.46Physical Ed 2.32 2.78 2.99Special Ed. 3.04 3.17 3.30Theatre 3.41 2.87 3.21

Final Clinical Evaluation The Graph CF1 Program Comparisons across programs areas of Content Knowledge is a graph of the percent of candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework Standard regarding content knowledge. The unit average was 82%.

Unit

NCI

Art

BIO

L

ELEM

HIST

/SSE

LIBM

EDIA

MSE

MO

LA

MUS

IC

PHET

E

SPED

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CF 1 Program Comparisons Content Knowledge 2010

Graph CF4 – Implementation/Management 2010 is a graph of the percent of candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual The Framework Standard regarding the critical skill of establishing classroom management.

CF4A CF4B CF4C CF4D CF4E CF4F0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%18% 19%

24% 27% 25%20%

CF 4 - Implementation/Management 2010%3's %2's

Final Clinical Evaluations Program comparisonsThe Graph CF2 Planning: Program Comparisons across programs areas is a graph of the percent of candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework Standard regarding the critical skill of planning. The unit average was 79%.

Unit NCIArt

BIOL

ELEM

HIST/SS

E

LIBMED

IAMSE

MOLAMUSIC

PHETE SPED

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CF2 - Planning: Program Comparisons 2010

Conceptual Framework Standard 4 – Implementation/Management

The Graph CF3 Learning Climate – Program Comparison 2010 is a graph of the percent of candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework Standard regarding the critical skill of establishing a positive learning climate. The unit average was 82%.

Unit NCIArt

BIOL

ELEM

HIST/SS

E

LIBMED

IAMSE

MOLAMUSIC

PHETE SPED

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CF3 Learning Climate - Program Comparisons 2010

The Graph CF5 – Evaluation/Assessment 2010 is a graph of the percent of candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework Standard regarding the critical skill of evaluation and assessment. The unit average was 75%.

CF5A CF5B CF5C CF5D CF5E0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CF 5 - Evaluation/Assessment 2010%3's %2's

Please review your folders in Can Teach for Program dataThe Graph CF6 – Evaluation/Assessment Fall 2010 is a graph of the percent of candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework Standard regarding the critical skill of communication. The unit average was 84%.

Unit NCIArt

BIOL

ELEM

HIST/SS

E

LIBMED

IAMSE

MOLAMUSIC

PHETE SPED

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CF6 Communication 2010

The Graph CF7 – Technology Fall 2010 is a graph of the percent of candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework Standard regarding the use of technology in instruction. The unit average was 77%.

Unit NCIArt

BIOL

ELEM

HIST/SS

E

LIBMED

IA MSEMOLA

MUSICPHETE SP

ED0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CF7 Technology 2010

The Graph CF8 – Diversity Fall 2010 is a graph of the percent of candidates completing the final clinical evaluation in student teaching and receiving an exemplary rating on the Conceptual Framework Standard regarding the critical skill of working with diverse students. The unit average was 81%.

Unit NCIArt

BIOL

ELEM

HIST/SS

E

LIBMED

IA MSEMOLA

MUSICPHETE SP

ED0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

CF8 Diversity 2010

Final Clinical Evaluation 2009-10 % Candidates Meeting or Exceeding Expectations on Performances

Program Area

N Content Knowledge

Planning

Learning Climate

Implemen-tation /Management

Evaluation/Assessment

Communi-cation

Techno-logy

Diver-sity

Unit 210 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99%NCI 6 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94% 94%Art 6 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Elem 99 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99% 99%Biology 2 100% 100% 100% 94% 100% 94% 100% 94%El/M 6 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Eng 11 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%History 13 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Library 2 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Math 2 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Middle 19 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Music 4 98% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%PHETE 6 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%SP ED 33 100% 99% 98% 98% 97% 100% 100% 98%Theatre 1 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100% 100%

CANDIDATE ETHNICTY n % Average GPAAmerican Indian or Alaska Native 0 0% Asian 1 0% 3.65Black or African American 18 6% 3.76Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 0 0% Hispanic or Latino 6 2% 3.70White 278 92% 3.87Two or more races 0 0% Race/ethnicity unknown 0 0% Total 303 Female 281 93% 3.86Male 22 7% 3.83DIVERSITY Percentage 8%

Graduate Education Program Diversity Unit

Diversity PercentageOverall 8%CSDS 7%C & I K-8 Math 0%C& I Modern Language/ 0%

C & I Music100

%C&I Sped General Curr K-12 33%Ed Leadership 13%Elem PK-6 Initial Licensure 0%English 33%Guidance & Counseling 29%Literacy & Culture 8%Modern Language Initial Licensure 0%School Library Media 4%Special Education 5%

Graduate Education ComparisonsNote C&I Music has 1 candidate

Full time vs. Part timeGPA Comparisons Male FemaleFull Time 3.84 3.93 3.89Part Time 3.86 Diversity percentage Male FemaleFull Time 6% 8% 92%Part Time 9% 7% 93%

The dispositions Average for the Unit was 4.72 and for NCI it was 4.9

Unit Data GPA Comparison Unit Praxis ComparisonsPercentage Passing

YearPrograms

# Lic

Enrollment

Entry into Teacher Prep

Completion

Praxis I

VCLA PraxisII VRA

2007-08 Unit

194 2.95 3.08 3.33 100%

100% 96% 99%

2008-09 Unit

207 2.98 3.09 3.35 100%

100% 99% 98%

2009-2010 Unit

210 3.04 3.13 3.34 100%

100% 100% 100%

Average Unit 2.99 3.10 3.34

Average NCI14 3.52 3.73 100%

100% 100% 100%

Please review your folders in Can Teach for individual program responses

Art

Business

Elemen

tary

Englis

h

History/

SSE MathMusic MSE

PHETE

Scien

ceSP

ED0.0

0.5

1.0

1.5

2.0

2.5

3.0

3.5

4.0

Teacher Candidate Survey Responses: Overall Ratings