Longitudinal Coordination of Care

LCP SWGThursday, July 11, 2013

Topic Presenter Time Allotted

Announcements and Reminders Evelyn 5 minutes

Care Plan C-CDA Design Discussion Lantana 55 minutes

Agenda

2

• The Voting Period is OPEN for the LCC Care Plan Exchange Use Case. Please cast your vote by Monday, July 15th at 8pm ET.• http://

wiki.siframework.org/LCC+Care+Plan+Exchange+Use+Case+Consensus

• Reminder that only LCC Committed Members can vote on the Use Case

• Become a Committed Member

• Call for Pilot Participation!– LCC Pilot Wiki Page

– Pilot Survey

• Meeting Reminders (next week)– LTPAC SWG meeting – Monday at 11am ET

– LCC HL7 Tiger Team SWG meeting – Wednesday at 11am ET

– LCP SWG meeting – Thursday at 5pm ET

3

Announcements & Reminders

Work Group SchedulesLCC WG

SWG Meeting LCC Leads Date/ Time Projects

LTPAC SWG Larry GarberTerry O'Malley

Weekly Mondays, 11-12pm EST

C-CDA: Transfer Summary, Consult Note, Referral Note

LCC HL7 Tiger Team

Russ Leftwich Weekly Wednesdays, 11-12pm EST

LCC WG comments for HL7 Care Plan DAM

LCP SWG Bill RussellSue MitchellJennie Harvell

Weekly Thursdays 5-6pm EST C-CDA: Care Plan, Home Health Plan of Care

HL7 WGSWG Meeting HL7 Lead Participating LCC

MembersDate/ Time Projects

HL7 Patient Care WG Russ LeftwichElaine Ayers Stephen Chu Michael Tan Kevin Coonan

Susan Campbell Laura H Langford Lindsey Hoggle

Bi-weekly Weds, 5 -6pm EST Care Plan DAMCare Coordination Services (CSS)

HL7 Structured Documents WG

Bob DolinBrett Marquard

Sue MitchellJennie Harvell

Weekly Thursdays, 10-12pm EST

CDA (various)

HL7 SOA WG CCS Project Jon Farmer Enrique Meneses (facilitators) Stephen Chu

Susan Campbell Weekly Tuesdays 5 - 6pm EST

Care Coordination Services (CSS)

HL7 Patient Generated Document

  Leslie Kelly Hall Weekly Fridays, 12-1pm EST Patient-authored Clinical Documents

CONSENSUS PROCESSBack-up Slides

5

• On July 8th, Committed members will be asked to cast a vote on the “LCC Care Plan Exchange Use Case”– Yes

• A Yes vote does not necessarily mean that the deliverable is the ideal one from the perspective of the Initiative Member, but that it is better to move forward than to block the deliverable

– Yes with comments• If a Consensus Process attracts significant comments (through Yes with

comment votes), it is expected that the comments be addressed in a future revision of the deliverable.

– Formal Objection- with comments indicating a path to address the objection in a way that meets the known concerns of other members of the Community of Interest. "Formal Objection" vote without such comments will be considered Abstain votes.

• A Formal Objection means that the objector cannot proceed with the project unless the objections are met. It is acceptable and expected to use a Formal Objection in a first consensus round to communicate a point of view or process issue that has not been addressed in the drafting of the initial deliverable.

• Should a Consensus Process attract even one "Formal Objection" vote with comments from an Initiative Member, the deliverable must be revised to address the "Formal Objection" vote (unless an exceptional process is declared).

– Abstain (decline to vote)

Consensus on the Use Case

6

Note: Each Organization, no matter the number of Committed Members only receives 1 Vote. If there are multiple committed members from your organization please verify your collective vote with them

http://wiki.siframework.org/LLC+Care+Plan+Exchange+Use+Case+Consensus

1.Review the Care Plan Exchange Use Case

2.Complete the Voting Form:– NOTE: You must be a Committed

Member to Vote• Yes• Yes with comments.• Formal Objection• Abstain (decline to vote)

3.Submit your Vote

4.A Message is displayed verifying your vote was recorded

7

22

33

44

Submitting Your Vote

11

5. You can view and track your Vote (located directly below the Voting Form)

• Note: you may need to refresh your browser a few times to see your vote

8

Note: All Consensus Votes are due July 15th by 8:00 pm EST

55

Viewing Your Vote

Date Item

6/20 Open End-to-End Review

6/27 Review End-to-End Comments

7/5 Close End-to-End Review

7/8 Open Consensus Voting

7/15 Close Consensus Voting at 8:00pm ET

7/16-7/17 Consolidate Votes and Address “No” Votes

7/18 Review Final Comment Dispositions and Complete all Outstanding Votes Verbally

7/19 Publish Consensus Voting Results

Consensus Timeline

9

LCC Use Case 2 Development ScheduleDate Item Homework (Due Wednesday COB)

3/2013 10.0 Scenario (User Stories, Base/Alternate Flow), 3.2 In Scope, 3.3 Out of Scope

Finalize: User Stories, Base Flows, In / Out of ScopeReview: Communities of Interest, Assumptions

4/2013 3.4 Communities of Interest, 5.0 Assumptions, 6.0 Pre-Conditions, 7.0 Post Conditions, 8.0 Actors and Roles, 11.0 Risks, Issues, and Obstacles, 10.4 Sequence Diagram

Finalize: Communities of Interest, Assumptions, Pre / Post Conditions, Actors and Roles, Risks, Issues and ObstaclesReview: Use Case Diagrams

5/2013 10.3 Functional Requirements, 9.0 Use Case Diagrams, Appendices, 12.0 Dataset Requirements

Finalize: Sequence Diagrams, Functional Requirements, Use Case Diagrams, AppendicesReview: Dataset Requirements

6/6/13 1.0 Preface and Introduction, 2.0 Initiative Overview, 3.0 Scope, 3.1 Background, 3.1.1 Care Plan Definitions and References, 4.0 Value Statement

End-to-End Review (preliminary), Dataset Requirements

6/13/13 12.0 Dataset Requirements End-to-End Review (preliminary), Dataset Requirements

6/20/13 12.0 Dataset Requirements End-to-End Review Period is 6/20-7/5

6/27/13 Review End-to-End Comments End-to-End Review – Submit Comments

7/4/13 Meeting Canceled End-to-End Review – Submit Comments

7/8-7/15 Consensus Voting Period VOTE!!

7/18/13 Review Final Comment Disposition and Complete all Outstanding Votes Verbally

7/19/13 Publish Consensus Vote Results