longevity catalysts - institute and faculty of actuaries · • longevity catalysts working party...
TRANSCRIPT
18/11/2013
1
Longevity CatalystsKhurram KhanRobert BuggDouglas Anderson
12 November 2013
Route-map• About us
• What is a longevity catalyst?
• Which problems are we looking to solve?
• Delayed recognition
• Potential indicators: OverviewPotential indicators: Overview
• Potential uses: Overview
• Examples of use
• Examples of Indicators
• Tobacco
• Stem cells
• Cancer diagnosis
18 November 2013 2
• Back testing: Breast cancer death rates
• Case study: Mortality improvements and cigarette smoking
• Aims for 2014
• Q & A
18/11/2013
2
About us
• Longevity Catalysts Working Party
• Set up in 2012
• What problem are we looking to solve?What problem are we looking to solve?
• We have a website! www.longevitycatalysts.com
18 November 2013 3
Longevity CatalystsWhat future events are we aware of today whose occurrence will be coupled
with a universal increase in expectations around mortality improvements?
Cardiovascular polypill Universal Influenza vaccine Bowel cancer screening
18 November 2013 4
Genetic ScreeningStem cell therapy for Parkinson’s
18/11/2013
3
What problems are we looking to solve?
• Uniqueness of the past
• Granularity
• Not making use of all available informationNot making use of all available information
• Greater appreciation of “dormant risks”
• Philosophy: imperfect but less so than status quo
• Delayed recognition
18 November 2013 5
Delayed Recognition
18 November 2013 6
18/11/2013
4
Potential Indicators
Candidate Desirable properties
Population tobacco consumption
Early cancer diagnosis rates
1. Objective
2. Regular
3. Frequent
4. Reliable
18 November 2013 7
Population cholesterol levels
5. Strong mortality link
6. Historic precursor?
Potential Uses
18 November 2013 8
18/11/2013
5
Example 1 – Economic Capital
• A stress and scenario testing framework linked to catalyst events could provide a more robust and less abstract way of calibrating, validating and communicating 1-in-200 year events
• A schedule of catalysts could help to answer the question:
“What could happen in the next year to significantly
18 November 2013 9
What could happen in the next year to significantly change our life expectancy estimates?”
Example 2 – Targeted Reinsurance / Retrocession
Premium
CedantReinsurer /
Investor
18 November 2013
10
Pay-out or series of pay-outs triggered by
occurrence of one of a list of longevity catalysts
18/11/2013
6
Example 3 – Longevity swap exclusions
Fixed cash flows
CedantReinsurer /
Investor
Additional payment triggered on occurrence of ‘excluded’
catalyst
18 November 2013 11
Actual “floating” cash flows
Example 4 – Longevity swap collateral call
Collateral account
Additional margin call into collateral account
CedantReinsurer / Investor
Fixed cash flows
on occurrence or non-occurrence of specified
catalyst(s)
18 November 2013
12
Actual “floating” cash flows
18/11/2013
7
Potential Uses
• Economic Capital / Solvency II
• Risk appetite
• Best estimate approach – what future events are youBest estimate approach what future events are you already (knowingly or otherwise) allowing for?
• Hedging
• Greater appreciation of
– Dormant risks
– Existing exposure
18 November 2013 13
Existing exposure
• Other
Monitoring of Key Indicators
18 November 2013 14
18/11/2013
8
Example: Smoking prevalenceUK �������
���
18 November 2013 15
Source: Office for National Statistics and Cancer Research UK
Tobacco Use in the US, 1900-2005
3500
4000
4500
5000
onsu
mpt
ion
70
80
90
100
er D
eath
Rat
es*
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
900
905
910
915
920
925
930
935
940
945
950
955
960
965
970
975
980
985
990
995
000
005
Per C
apita
Cig
aret
te C
o
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Age-
Adju
sted
Lung
Can
ce
18 November 2013 16
19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 194
194
19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 19 20 20
Year* A����������� �� 2000 US �������� �����������
P������ ������� D���� ������ US M�������� D���� 1960�2005� US M�������� V������� 1930�1959�
N������� C����� ��� H����� S���������� C������ ��� D������ C������
��� P���������� 2006� C�������� ������������ US D��������� �� A����������� 1900�2007�
S�������� ������� ���� ��������� �� ��� A������� C����� S������ 2009
18/11/2013
9
Example – Stem Cell TreatmentsCell types Stem cells
experimentalStem cells implantation
Skin Yes Yes
Cartilage Yes Yes
Arteries & veins Yes
Trachea Yes Yes
Eye (retinal cells) Yes Yes
Pancreas (insulin cells)
Yes Yes
Brain (dopamine cells)
Yes Yes
Red blood cells Yes Yes
18 November 2013 17
Red blood cells Yes Yes
Lung Yes
Heart Yes
Liver Yes
Small intestine Yes
Example – Cancer Mortality by Diagnosis Route
Source: Improving Outcomes, A Strategy for Cancer
18 November 2013 18
• In 2007, over 50,000 cancer patients in the UK were diagnosed on emergency presentation
• Earlier detection would clearly have a very significant impact on cancer rates
18/11/2013
10
Back testing past catalysts: Breast cancer screening and Tamoxifen
19
Impact on past breast cancer death ratesThere is a clear signal in observed mortality data that shows large reductions in breast cancer mortality in 1990’s and 2000’s following the introduction of a national breast screening programme and the increased use of the drug Tamoxifen in the mid to late 1980’s
20
This suggests a potential for similar improvements in the 2010’s and 2020’s for bowel cancer due to the recently launched bowel cancer screening programme.
18/11/2013
11
Case study: the unfolding smoking story
German Institute for Tobacco Hazards Muller suggests link Royal College of
Doll & Hill identify link between
study confirms Muller’s finding
1943
Health warnings on packaging
1971
TV advertising of cigarettes banned
1965
between smoking and cancer
1939
Physicians calls for tobacco controls
1962
smoking and lung disease
1950
60% of men smoke40% of women smoke
Bhutan becomes
Unal et al show 54% of
improvements i CHD
18 November 2013 21
Smoking ban in public places, including pubs
2006
Call for regulation of electronic cigarettes
2013
Class actions in US &increases in tobacco duties
1980s 1990s
first country to ban sale of tobacco
products
2010
20% of men smoke20% of women smoke
in CHDmortality relate
to smoking
2005
Why did it take so long?
• Groupthink• Categorical proof of link• Popularity amongst voters• Personal habits of decision makers
• Tough habit to break• Tax revenues• Lobbying• People don’t act rationally• Personal habits of decision-makers
20
30
40
50
60
70Percentage of adult men who smoke (by SEC)
• People don t act rationally
18 November 2013 22
0
10
1972 1976 1980 1984 1988 1992 1996 2000 2004 2008
Professional Employers and managersIntermediate and junior non‐manual Skilled manualSemi‐skilled manual Unskilled manualNon‐manual Manual
18/11/2013
12
Questions Comments
Expressions of individual views by members of the Institute and Faculty of Actuaries and its staff are encouraged
18 November 2013 23
Faculty of Actuaries and its staff are encouraged.
The views expressed in this presentation are those of the presenters.