london compared: immigrants and politics in new york city john mollenkopf center for urban research...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649db45503460f94aa4dcc/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
London Compared: Immigrants and Politicsin New York City
John MollenkopfCenter for Urban Research
The Graduate Center, CUNY
London School of Economics
November 2012
![Page 2: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649db45503460f94aa4dcc/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Urban Democracy and the Immigrant ‘Other’
• New York and London’s populatons are becoming increasingly immigrant-origin
• Yet many immigrants lack citizenship and do not have voting rights; immigrant-origin voting age citizens are less politically mobilized
• This creates a “representation gap” between the size of an immigrant-origin group and their share of representatives (legislative and executive)
• This contradicts basic democratic norms – and creates numerous practical challenges for public services
• How is New York City closing this gap?
![Page 3: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649db45503460f94aa4dcc/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
How Urban Politics Can ‘Bring Outsiders In’?
• Some socio-economic inclusion is a pre-requisite for political inclusion– But ‘bureaucratic incorporation’ takes place even for
undocumented or illegal immigrants
• The multi-step process of legal entry, citizenship acquisition, political identification, political mobilization takes time
• Both sides must help this to happen
![Page 4: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649db45503460f94aa4dcc/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
The New York City Electorate• The “Funnel” of Political Participation:
– 8.2 million residents (38.5% foreign born [CPS 2012])– 5.1 million voting age citizens (32.1% foreign born [CPS 2012]– 2.5 million presidential votes cast in 2012 (30% foreign born & 18%
children of FB [CPS 2012])– 1.1 million votes in 2013 mayoral election – 692,000 Democratic Primary voters (Mayor 2013) (est. 30%FB)
• Most NYC voters are Democrats (68.9%), followed by ‘no party declared (16.9%) and Republicans (11.2%)
• In general elections, whites cast about 38% of vote, blacks 30% of vote, Latinos 21% of vote, and Asians 8%– White voters are 64.3% native stock, blacks voters 52.4% native stock,
Latinos 49% native stock, and Asians 4% native stock. – Overall, just under half of NYC general election voters are immigrants
or children of immigrants– Native stock whites made up only 25% of NYC voters in 2012
![Page 5: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649db45503460f94aa4dcc/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
How they Lean
• Black groups most Democratic (correlation ~ .350)– African Americans (.346) and West Indians (.341) quite similar
• Latino groups also highly Democratic (.200)– Dominicans (.213) a bit more Democratic than Puerto Ricans
(.192)– Mexicans (.137) also trending Democratic– Colombians, Ecuadorans, Peruvians (.083) less Democatic
• Asian groups least Democratic (.050)– Bangladeshis most Democratic (.114), Pakistanis least (-.028)– Chinese (.050) more Democratic than Koreans (.029)
![Page 6: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649db45503460f94aa4dcc/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
This is a vast change from 1990
• In 1990, native whites made up 46 percent of VAC, a figure that has been cut by at least a third
• In 1990, immigrants made up 18 percent of VAC, a figure that has increased by three-quarters.
• In 1990, the NYC Council had no first or second generation immigrant members. It gained two after the 1991 expansion and redistricting.
• By 2013, it had 4 Dominican, 4 West Indian, 2 Asian, and 1 Mexican-origin members (or 21.6% of 51 members), joining 15 native stock minority members
![Page 7: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649db45503460f94aa4dcc/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Immigrant Representation?• The “immigrant representation gap” between
immigrant-origin share of eligible electorate and share of council seats held has thus been cut from 100% in 1990 to 56% in 2013.
• Glass half empty or half full? At least it is progress
• Immigrants per se do not vote as solid block in Council or mayoral elections, but are broken down by race and national origin
• Thus political elites see them as ethnic groups, not and immigrant collectivity
![Page 8: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649db45503460f94aa4dcc/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Role in Mayoral Votes
• Success of “Koch Coalition” increasingly dependent on divisions among minority groups as white majority has slipped steadily
• Black versus Latino competition in 2001, 2005, 2009• Immigrant minorities slightly less Democratic than
native minorities, but still vote along similar lines• De Blasio overcame white-black division, black-Latino
division in 2013 Democratic primary (against a black opponent); benefitted from West Indian support and absence of Latino candidate
![Page 9: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649db45503460f94aa4dcc/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Immigrant / Minority Empowerment
• Greatest accent on class (inequality) issues in housing, paid sick leave, etc.
• Municipal ID cards on the legislative agenda – but details to work out
• Significant immigrant-origin appointees in de Blasio administration– Dominicans to DODC, Contracts, SBS, Community
Affairs, Haitian to Finance, West Indian to DCAS, Indians to HHS and Immigrant Affairs…
![Page 10: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics](https://reader036.vdocuments.us/reader036/viewer/2022082610/56649db45503460f94aa4dcc/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
www.urbanresearch.org