london compared: immigrants and politics in new york city john mollenkopf center for urban research...

10
London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics November 2012

Upload: milo-robbins

Post on 23-Dec-2015

220 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics

London Compared: Immigrants and Politicsin New York City

John MollenkopfCenter for Urban Research

The Graduate Center, CUNY

London School of Economics

November 2012

Page 2: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics

Urban Democracy and the Immigrant ‘Other’

• New York and London’s populatons are becoming increasingly immigrant-origin

• Yet many immigrants lack citizenship and do not have voting rights; immigrant-origin voting age citizens are less politically mobilized

• This creates a “representation gap” between the size of an immigrant-origin group and their share of representatives (legislative and executive)

• This contradicts basic democratic norms – and creates numerous practical challenges for public services

• How is New York City closing this gap?

Page 3: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics

How Urban Politics Can ‘Bring Outsiders In’?

• Some socio-economic inclusion is a pre-requisite for political inclusion– But ‘bureaucratic incorporation’ takes place even for

undocumented or illegal immigrants

• The multi-step process of legal entry, citizenship acquisition, political identification, political mobilization takes time

• Both sides must help this to happen

Page 4: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics

The New York City Electorate• The “Funnel” of Political Participation:

– 8.2 million residents (38.5% foreign born [CPS 2012])– 5.1 million voting age citizens (32.1% foreign born [CPS 2012]– 2.5 million presidential votes cast in 2012 (30% foreign born & 18%

children of FB [CPS 2012])– 1.1 million votes in 2013 mayoral election – 692,000 Democratic Primary voters (Mayor 2013) (est. 30%FB)

• Most NYC voters are Democrats (68.9%), followed by ‘no party declared (16.9%) and Republicans (11.2%)

• In general elections, whites cast about 38% of vote, blacks 30% of vote, Latinos 21% of vote, and Asians 8%– White voters are 64.3% native stock, blacks voters 52.4% native stock,

Latinos 49% native stock, and Asians 4% native stock. – Overall, just under half of NYC general election voters are immigrants

or children of immigrants– Native stock whites made up only 25% of NYC voters in 2012

Page 5: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics

How they Lean

• Black groups most Democratic (correlation ~ .350)– African Americans (.346) and West Indians (.341) quite similar

• Latino groups also highly Democratic (.200)– Dominicans (.213) a bit more Democratic than Puerto Ricans

(.192)– Mexicans (.137) also trending Democratic– Colombians, Ecuadorans, Peruvians (.083) less Democatic

• Asian groups least Democratic (.050)– Bangladeshis most Democratic (.114), Pakistanis least (-.028)– Chinese (.050) more Democratic than Koreans (.029)

Page 6: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics

This is a vast change from 1990

• In 1990, native whites made up 46 percent of VAC, a figure that has been cut by at least a third

• In 1990, immigrants made up 18 percent of VAC, a figure that has increased by three-quarters.

• In 1990, the NYC Council had no first or second generation immigrant members. It gained two after the 1991 expansion and redistricting.

• By 2013, it had 4 Dominican, 4 West Indian, 2 Asian, and 1 Mexican-origin members (or 21.6% of 51 members), joining 15 native stock minority members

Page 7: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics

Immigrant Representation?• The “immigrant representation gap” between

immigrant-origin share of eligible electorate and share of council seats held has thus been cut from 100% in 1990 to 56% in 2013.

• Glass half empty or half full? At least it is progress

• Immigrants per se do not vote as solid block in Council or mayoral elections, but are broken down by race and national origin

• Thus political elites see them as ethnic groups, not and immigrant collectivity

Page 8: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics

Role in Mayoral Votes

• Success of “Koch Coalition” increasingly dependent on divisions among minority groups as white majority has slipped steadily

• Black versus Latino competition in 2001, 2005, 2009• Immigrant minorities slightly less Democratic than

native minorities, but still vote along similar lines• De Blasio overcame white-black division, black-Latino

division in 2013 Democratic primary (against a black opponent); benefitted from West Indian support and absence of Latino candidate

Page 9: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics

Immigrant / Minority Empowerment

• Greatest accent on class (inequality) issues in housing, paid sick leave, etc.

• Municipal ID cards on the legislative agenda – but details to work out

• Significant immigrant-origin appointees in de Blasio administration– Dominicans to DODC, Contracts, SBS, Community

Affairs, Haitian to Finance, West Indian to DCAS, Indians to HHS and Immigrant Affairs…

Page 10: London Compared: Immigrants and Politics in New York City John Mollenkopf Center for Urban Research The Graduate Center, CUNY London School of Economics

www.urbanresearch.org