LONDON BOROUGH OF ENFIELD

PLANNING COMMITTEE Date:

22 September 2020

Report of:

Head of Planning

Contact Officer: Andy HighamDavid GittensGideon Whittingham Tel No: 020 8132 1623

Ward:

Ponders End

Application Number: 20/02127/FUL Category: Minor

LOCATION: Car Park South Of Wharf Road Enfield EN3 4TW

PROPOSAL: Redevelopment of the site for storage of operational vehicles, including resurfacing, guard hut, welfare block, landscaping, associated parking, and infrastructure including Electric charging points and associated works.

Applicant Name & Address: Lysander C/o Agent

Agent Name & Address: Mr Nick Bowen DWD Property + Planning 6 New Bridge Street London United Kingdom EC4V 6AB

RECOMMENDATION: That planning permission be GRANTED subject to conditions

Ref: 20/02127/FUL LOCATION: Car Park South Of , Wharf Road, Enfield, EN3 4TW

Reproduced by permission of Ordnance Survey on behalf of HMSO. ©Crown Copyright and database right 2013. All Rights Reserved. Ordnance Survey License number 100019820

Scale 1:1250 North

1. Note for Members 1.1 Due to the designation of this existing site within the Green Belt, this planning application is

categorised as a “departure from the adopted plan and in accordance with the scheme of delegation, is reported to Planning Committee for determination.

2. Recommendation / Conditions 2.1 That planning permission be GRANTED subject to the following conditions:

1. TIME LIMIT 2. DEVELOPMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH PLANS 3. MATERIALS USED 4. DETAILS OF HARD LANDSCAPING 5. DETAILS OF SOFT LANDSCAPING 6. DETAILS OF SITE ENCLOSURE 7. DETAILS OF CYCLE STORAGE 8. DETAILS OF REFUSE STORAGE 9. SURFACE DRAINAGE WORKS / SUDS 10. VERIFICATION OF SURFACE DRAINAGE WORKS / SUDS 11. CHARGING POINTS FOR ELECTRIC VEHICLES 12. BIRD AND BAT BOX LOCATIONS 13. LIGHTING STRATEGY 14. CONTAMINATION 15. TREE REPLACEMENT

2.2 It is also requested that authority to finalise the wording of conditions under the above headings, is given to officers to ensure they reflect any issues raised by Planning Committee and / or any reported updates to the meeting. 3. Executive Summary 3.1 Planning permission is sought for the use of a car park (which is the lawful use of the site) for the

storage of operational vehicles associated with a distribution warehouse (Use Class B8) in Stockingswater Lane, Brimsdown.

3.2 The proposal would involve the provision of 100 vehicle spaces along with 2 ancillary buildings and infrastructure for a site located on Green Belt, and in the wider proximity to Sites of Metropolitan Importance for Nature Conservation (SINC) and Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).

3.3 The reasons for recommending approval of this application are:

• The proposed development would not result in undue harm to the character and openness of the Green Belt and is therefore acceptable.

• The proposed development would support jobs and economic activity in the Borough • The proposed development, by virtue of its siting and scale, is considered appropriate and would not result in detrimental harm to the character and appearance of the wider area. • The proposed development, by virtue of its size, siting and proximity would not harm the amenity of occupying and neighbouring residents. • The proposal would not cause any unacceptable harm upon highway safety or the flow of traffic in the locality. • The operation of the site would have appropriate regard to environmental sustainability issues including energy and water conservation, renewable energy generation, and efficient resource use. • The proposal demonstrates how proposed measures manage the risk of flooding from surface water run-off and follow the drainage hierarchy in the London Plan. • The proposal would retain and protect trees of amenity value, whilst providing appropriate replacement. • The proposal would have appropriate regard to the site and wider ecological assets. • The development would be appropriate and in accordance with relevant National and Regional Policy, Core Strategy and Development policies and for the reasons noted above.

4. Site & Surroundings 4.1 The application site is located to the south of Wharf Road. The site is bound to the east and west

by the River Lea Navigation (also known as the River Lee), with the William Girling Reservoir to the far east.

4.2 The site is approximately 0.78ha in size and contains a large area of hardstanding, with a single storey building of approximately 62sqm, previously used as a bike shed, located in the south west corner. The site also contains a number of trees, the majority of which form the northern, eastern and southern boundaries, along with lighting columns and fencing.

4.3 The public transport accessibility level (PTAL) of the site is 1a/2 (Very Poor/Poor).

4.4 Vehicular access to the site is via recessed gates off Wharf Road, whilst a footbridge adjacent to, but not forming part of the site, is located on the western boundary and crosses the River Lea Navigation and the towpath/River Lea Walk, connecting with the commercial/industrial units forming part of Navigation Park. It should be noted however that this footbridge is not publicly accessible.

4.5 Located to the east and south of the site are two pylons, whereby overhead power lines (OHL Zone) cross the site.

4.6 The site is located within the Green Belt, an Area of Special Character, Regeneration Priority Area, Archaeological Priority Area and Flood Zone 2.

4.7 The site itself is not subject to any statutory or non‐statutory ecological/nature conservation designations however it is adjacent to and surrounded on all sides by a Site of Metropolitan Importance for Nature Conservation and adjacent to Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI).

4.8 The Site is not located within a Conservation Area and there are no Listed Buildings, Scheduled

Monuments or World Heritage Sites in the immediate vicinity.

5. Proposal 5.1 The proposal seeks the following:

• Redevelopment of the site for storage of operational vehicles for an existing distribution warehouse at Stockingswater Lane, Brimsdown.

5.2 The proposal would require the demolition of the existing structure, the resurfacing (hard and soft)

of the site, along with the erection of supporting facilitates and infrastructure, to provide 99 x van spaces, 1 x staff bay, 2 x motorcycle spaces and 10 x cycle spaces including:

• The erection of 14 lighting columns (6m in height) throughout • The erection of 6no. substations (2no. x 3.5m in height x 3m in width x 4m in length and

4no. x 3.5m in height x 3m in width x 3m length). • The erection of a 2.4 metre metal fence along the perimeter of the site, with a 1.7m acoustic

fence along the western boundary. • The erection of a prefabricated welfare unit (3m in height x 2.7m in width x 7.3m in length)

providing 17sqm of floorspace with office, canteen and toilet facilities located towards the eastern boundary.

• The erection of a metal framed cycle shelter (2.1m in height x 2.1m in width x 4.1 in length) and smoking shelter (2.1m in height x 2.1m in width x 4.1 in length) located towards the eastern boundary.

• The erection of a gatehouse (3.6m in height x 4.2m in width x 7.1m in length) with access control of vehicle and pedestrian gates to both sides, providing 28sqm of floorspace with kitchen and w/c facilities, recessed from the main entrance to the north.

6. Consultation Statutory and Non-Statutory Consultees 6.1 The consultation responses have directed and facilitated the changes to the development and

applicable conditions have been added to secure policy compliant development:

External

6.2 The Canal and Rivers Trust - No objection subject to conditions 6.3 Environment Agency - No Objection 6.4 Cadent Gas Line Limited (National Grid): Comment provided see report

Internal 6.5 SUDS Team (Sustainable urban drainage systems) - No objection subject to conditions 6.6 Transport - No objection Public 6.7 Consultation letters were sent to 19 neighbouring and nearby properties. A site notice was displayed from 23.07.2020 (expiring on 18.08.2020). No consultation responses have been received.

7. Relevant Planning History 7.1 Known as Car Park Navigation Business Park:

• 18/03209/SO - Environmental Impact Assessment Screening Opinion Request under Part

2, Regulation 6 of the Town and Country Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) Regulations 2017 in relation to the construction of industrial unit (B1c, B2 and B8). Screening Opinion EIA Not Required 04.09.2018

• 15/00037/CEU - Use of site as car park. Granted 04.03.2015

• 14/02813/CEU - Use of the site as a car park. Refused 09.09.2014

• TP/80/0886 – Oil Compound. Granted with Conditions 29.09.1980

• TP/79/1293 – Gas Meter House. Granted with Conditions 09.10.1979

• 11/0528 - Car Park. Granted with Conditions 31.08.1962

• 8322 – Gatehouse. Granted 06.11.1963 7.2 Adjacent site known as Navigation Park, Morson Road:

• 17/02610/FUL - Installation of electric boundary gates. Granted with Conditions.

22.09.2017

• 15/01263/RM- Submission of reserved matters approved under reference P12-02641PLA in respect of design, external appearance, access, siting, scale and landscaping pursuant to conditions 03, 04, 05, 06 and 25 together with phasing plan pursuant to condition 02 of outline approval for erection of 3 warehouse units (within Use Classes B1c,B2 and/or B8) totalling 16,300 sq.m. together with ancillary offices, car parking, landscaping and servicing areas. Granted 24.06.2015

• P12-02641PLA - Redevelopment of site by the erection of 19,000 sq.m. of buildings within use classes B1c/B2 and B8, together with car parking, service areas, landscaping, access roads, plant and ancillary offices. (Outline - all matters reserved). Granted with Conditions 01.10.2013

8. Relevant Planning Policies 8.1 National and Regional Policies National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) 2019 National Planning Practice Guidance (NPPG) 8.2 London Plan

Policy 2.17 Strategic industrial locations Policy 2.18 Green infrastructure: the multi-functional network of green and open spaces Policy 4.4 Managing industrial land and premises Policy 5.1 Climate change mitigation Policy 5.2 Minimising carbon dioxide emissions Policy 5.3 Sustainable design and construction Policy 5.7 Renewable energy Policy 5.8 Innovative energy technologies Policy 5.9 Overheating and cooling Policy 5.10 Urban greening Policy 5.11 Green roofs and development site environs Policy 5.13 Sustainable drainage Policy 5.14 Water quality and wastewater infrastructure Policy 5.16 Waste net self-sufficiency Policy 5.18 Construction, excavation and demolition waste Policy 5.19 Hazardous waste Policy 5.21 Contaminated land Policy 6.3 Assessing the effects of development on transport capacity Policy 6.9 Cycling Policy 6.10 Walking Policy 6.12 Road network capacity Policy 6.13 Parking Policy 7.1 Building London’s neighbourhoods and communities Policy 7.2 An inclusive environment Policy 7.3 Designing out crime

Policy 7.4 Local character Policy 7.6 Architecture Policy 7.14 Improving air quality Policy 7.15 Reducing noise and enhancing soundscapes Policy 7.16 Green belt Policy 7.19 Biodiversity and access to nature Policy 7.20 Geological conservation Policy Policy 7.21 Trees and woodlands Policy Policy 8.2 Planning obligations

8.3 The London Plan – Draft A draft London Plan was published on 29 November 2017 for consultation purposes with a deadline for consultation of 2 March 2018. The current 2016 (The London Plan consolidated with alterations since 2011) is still the adopted Development Plan, but the Draft London Plan is a material consideration in planning decisions. The significance given to it is a matter for the decision makers, but it gains more weight as it moves through the process. It is anticipated that the publication of the final London Plan will be in the later end of 2020, and as such its weight, as a material consideration, is increasing. Of particular importance: Policy GG5 Growing a Good Economy Policy E4 Land for Industry, Logistics and Services to support economy PolicyG2 Green belt PolicySI13 Sustainable Drainage Policy SI 16 Waterways (Use & Enjoyment) Policy G6 Biodiversity

8.4 Core Strategy

CP13 Promoting economic prosperity CP14 Safeguarding Strategic industrial locations CP20 Sustainable energy use and energy infrastructure CP21 Delivering sustainable water supply, drainage and sewerage infrastructure CP22 Delivering sustainable waste management CP24 The road network CP25 Pedestrians and cyclists CP26 Public transport CP28 Managing flood risk through development CP30 Maintaining and improving the quality of the built and open environment CP32 Pollution CP35 Lee Valley Regional Park And Waterways CP36 Biodiversity CP40 North East Enfield CP46 Infrastructure contributions

8.5 DMD DMD19 Strategic Industrial Locations DMD20 Locally Significant Industrial Sites DMD21 Complementary and supporting services within the SIL and LSIS DMD25 Locations for New Retail, Leisure and Office Development DMD37 Achieving High Quality Design-Led Development DMD38 Design Process DMD45 Parking standards and layout (parking, design, car free aspects, car club, traffic flow) DMD47 Access, new roads, and servicing (pedestrians, cyclists, vehicular access, refuse, operations for nurseries) DMD48 Transport assessments, travel plans, servicing & delivery plans DMD49 Sustainable Design and Construction Statements DMD50 Environmental Assessment Methods

DMD51 Energy Efficiency Standards DMD53 Low and Zero Carbon Technology DMD54 Allowable Solutions DMD57 Responsible Sourcing of Materials DMD58 Water Efficiency DMD59 Avoiding and Reducing Flood Risk DMD60 Assessing Flood Risk DMD61 Managing Surface Water DMD64 Pollution Control and Assessment DMD65 Air Quality DMD66 Land Contamination and Instability DMD68 Noise DMD69 Light Pollution DMD70 Water Quality DMD78 Nature Conservation DMD79 Ecological Enhancements DMD81 Landscaping DMD 82 Protecting the Green Belt DMD 83 Development Adjacent to the Green Belt DMD 84 Areas of Special Character DMD 89 Previously Developed Sites in the Green Belt

9. Analysis

Land Use

Policy Context

9.1 In assessing any application within the context of green belt, several paragraphs of the NPPF are of relevance: -

9.2 Paragraph 133: “The Government attaches great importance to Green Belts. The fundamental

aim of Green Belt policy is to prevent urban sprawl by keeping land permanently open; the essential characteristics of Green Belts are their openness and their permanence”.

9.3 The Green Belt serves five purposes (paragraph 134):

• to check the unrestricted sprawl of large built-up areas; • to prevent neighbouring towns merging into one another; • to assist in safeguarding the countryside from encroachment; • to preserve the setting and special character of historic towns; and • to assist in urban regeneration, by encouraging the recycling of derelict and other • urban land.

9.4 Paragraph 141 further expands upon the policy objective. “Once Green Belts have been defined,

local planning authorities should plan positively to enhance their beneficial use, such as looking for opportunities to provide access; to provide opportunities for outdoor sport and recreation; to retain and enhance landscapes, visual amenity and biodiversity; or to improve damaged and derelict land (paragraph 141, NPPF).

9.5 London Plan (2016) Policy 7.16 ‘Green Belt’ notes that “the strongest protection should be given to London’s Green Belt, in accordance with national guidance. Inappropriate development should be refused, except in very special circumstances. Development will be supported if it is appropriate and helps secure the objectives of improving the Green Belt as set out in national guidance.”

9.6 Under NPPF paragraph 143 states that: ‘Inappropriate development is, by definition, harmful to the Green Belt and should not be approved except in very special circumstances.’

9.7 The NPPF goes on to expand upon ‘very special circumstances’ in paragraph 144: ‘When considering any planning application, local planning authorities should ensure that substantial weight is given to any harm to the Green Belt. ‘Very special circumstances’ will not exist unless the potential harm to the Green Belt by reason of inappropriateness, and any other harm, is clearly outweighed by other considerations. To be ‘clearly outweighed’, implies well beyond in balance.

9.8 Paragraph 145 of the NPPF states exceptions that can be regarded by the local planning authority. This can include ‘limited infilling or the partial or complete redevelopment of previously developed land, whether redundant or in continuing use (excluding temporary buildings), which would:

• not have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than the existing

development; or • not cause substantial harm to the openness of the Green Belt, where the development

would re-use previously developed land and contribute to meeting an identified affordable housing need within the area of the local planning authority.’

9.9 Following on, Policy DMD 82 resists inappropriate development within the Green Belt and

presents strict criteria whereby development may be permitted. Appropriate development in the Green Belt is defined by the NPPF.

9.10 This includes forms of development on previously developed sites. DMD89 provides a two-tier

approach to protecting Green Belt and delivering sustainable development. Complete redevelopment of previously developed sites can be appropriate subject to meeting the criteria within the policy. Development not considered appropriate will be treated as a departure from the Local Plan.

9.11 However limited infilling or the partial or complete redevelopment of previously developed sites

elsewhere in the Green Belt will only be permitted if all of the following criteria are met:

• New development does not have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt; • The proposal does not lead to an increase in the developed proportion of the site; • The proposal does not lead to any significant increase in motorised traffic generation, as

evidenced through a suitable traffic modelling tool; and • The proposal contributes towards the aims of sustainable development.

Existing Car Park

9.12 The lawful use of the site, as a car park (272 spaces) has been confirmed by way of a Certificate

of Lawfulness (Ref: 15/00037/CEU) due to the continuous ten year period prior to the date of the application. Much of this evidence base stems from the planning permission in 1962 (Ref: 11/0528) which granted a car park. It previously supported adjoining industrial uses on the western side of the River Lee navigation.

9.13 The site is almost entirely covered in hardstanding (tarmac), with a single storey building located in the south west corner. The site also contains a number of trees, the majority of which form the northern, eastern and southern boundaries, along with lighting columns and fencing. In this respect, the site maintains a significant degree of openness, albeit having been previously developed land.

9.14 The current industrial / commercial use therefore is at odds with the green belt designation, but

significant weight must be given to this when assessing the proposal notwithstanding the proposal would constitute a departure from the relevant strategic / development management policies. However, there are exceptions to this presumption against new buildings in the Green Belt. One such exemption is the partial or complete redevelopment of previously development land, whether

redundant or in continuing use, which would not have a greater impact on the openness of the Green Belt than the existing development.

Car Park as proposed

9.15 The site would be redeveloped for the storage of operational vehicles for an existing distribution

warehouse at Stockingswater Lane (in the Brimsdown Strategic Industrial Location – SIL), located approximately 1 mile to the north east.

9.16 The warehouse serves as a hub for the distribution of packages and/or goods but the scope to adapt the existing distribution warehouse site is limited and the is a requirement to improve the operational capacity of the existing facility. This site has therefore been chosen to store vans that are functionally linked to the operation of the distribution warehouse and in this regard, proximity is a key consideration to the applicant.

9.17 The proposal would result in the erection of several facilitates including a gatehouse, a welfare unit and supporting infrastructure including lighting columns, substations and boundary treatment. The structures would result in 134sqm of floorspace (an increase in 72sqm in total). The resulting coverage of the site with facilitates and supporting infrastructure would be 1.7% in total, up from 0.8%. The lighting columns would be the tallest introduction to the site at 6m, however given their width and distribution throughout the site, it is considered they would be of no greater harm than the existing lighting columns in situ. The proposal would also involve re-surfacing the existing hardstanding (tarmac), whilst returning a portion of concrete and foliage in the north east corner, approximately 143sqm, to solely soft landscaping.

9.18 The works proposed in this application would not maintain openness in the sense of the absence

of visible development since both the surfacing and the installation of facilitates and supporting infrastructure are visible developments. It is considered however that the works proposed would not worsen the relationship to and be of no harm upon the current openness of the Green Belt.

9.19 Limited weight is given on the harm of parked vehicles on the openness of the Green Belt and on

whether such parked vehicles contribute to the conclusion as to whether the development is inappropriate. Parked vehicles are not visible development and are on the site only transiently. The making of a material change of use of land to a car park may well be inappropriate development, but in this case no material change is involved other than its relationship with a distribution warehouse elsewhere in the borough. Moreover, significant weight must be given to the lawful use of the site.

9.20 Given the amount and nature of the visible development by way of the facilitates and supporting

infrastructure, the harm in these respects is limited. The harm is further mitigated by the fact that the application site could lawfully function as a car park in any case. The formation of the car park could conflict with the Green Belt objective of retaining attractive landscapes and enhancing landscapes near to where people live, but this harm is also limited as the parking area would be relatively well screened from outside view or prominent locations, and in its present state contributes little to the surrounding landscape.

9.21 The supporting Transport Assessment indicates the site would service 64% fewer parked vehicles

and fewer trips generated as a result than the potential baseline of the lawful car park, in addition, the capability of accommodating Electric Vehicles, with 20% ‘active’ and 80% ‘passive’, indicates the proposal would not lead to any significant increase in motorised traffic generation, but also contributes towards the aims of sustainable development. Conclusion

9.22 Having regard to the provisions of the NPPF, London Plan, Core Strategy and Development Management Document as outlined above, it is considered the development where inappropriate

would not result in undue harm to the character and openness of the Green Belt and is therefore acceptable.

Design

Policy review

9.23 London Plan policies 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, 7.4 and 7.6, policy DMD 37: Achieving High Quality and Design-

Led Development, seek to secure high quality design. Demolition

9.24 The site is predominantly hardstanding, however a single storey building of approximately 62sqm, previously used as a bike shed, is located in the south west corner. The significance of the building to be demolished, by virtue of its form, quality of materials and purpose is of limited value and therefore limited weight shall be accorded to its conservation. In the absence of making a positive contribution to the wider area, the complete demolition of this building is acceptable subject to a suitable replacement. Design of replacement buildings

9.25 The proposal would result in the erection of several facilitates including a gatehouse and a welfare unit and supporting infrastructure including lighting columns, substations and boundary treatment. The proposed structures are utilitarian in design and form and would result in 134sqm of floorspace (an increase in 72sqm in total). The resulting coverage of the site with facilitates would be 1.7% in total and located predominantly along the north-eastern areas. The scale and siting of the proposed structures are considered appropriate in this context and would serve the site without adding significant coverage. The supporting structures, namely the lighting columns would be the tallest introduction to the site at 6m, however given their girth and distribution throughout the site, their introduction is considered appropriate and would be of no greater harm than the existing lighting columns in situ.

Conclusion

9.26 The proposed development, by virtue of its siting and scale, is considered appropriate and would

not result in detrimental harm to the character and appearance of the wider area. The proposal therefore complies with Policy DMD37. Impact on Residential Amenity Policy review

9.27 Policy 7.6 of the London Plan states that developments should have appropriate regard to their surroundings, and that they improve the environment in terms of residential amenity. Policy CP30 of the Enfield Core Strategy seeks to ensure that new developments are high quality and design-led, having regards to their context. They should help to deliver Core Strategy policy CP9 in supporting community cohesion by promoting attractive, safe, accessible and inclusive neighbourhoods. Policy DMD8 states that new developments should preserve amenity in terms of daylight, sunlight, outlook, privacy, overlooking, noise and disturbance.

9.28 The surrounding area is characterised by commercial/industrial units forming part of Navigation

Park across the River Lea Navigation to the west, with the William Girling Reservoir to the far east. To the north of the site is the Wharf Road highway and beyond is an open green area.

9.29 The closet residential accommodation to the site is located to the north west, on the opposite side of the River Lea Navigation, and across the Wharf Road highway, some 30m away.

9.30 Although the proposal would introduce an operational element, linked to the distribution warehouse, the proposed use would not be detrimentally different to that could lawfully occur.

9.31 The site would service 64% fewer parked vehicles and fewer trips generated as a result than the potential baseline of the lawful car park. As a result, the potential noise generated from the proposal would be significantly lower than existing and would not have a detrimental material impact upon its neighbouring properties across the Wharf Road highway and the River Lea Navigation.

9.32 The site would see the erection of additional supporting facilitates and infrastructure, including several prefabricated units, along with boundary treatment and lighting columns, however, given their siting, height and proximity more than 30m away, the proposal would not result in any harm to the existing amenity levels of occupying and neighbouring residents, in particular sunlight and daylight, outlook and privacy.

9.33 The supporting documents adequately indicate the impacts are policy complaint and in all other

aspects would maintain existing or good amenity levels.

Conclusion

9.34 The proposed development, by virtue of its size, siting and proximity would not harm the amenity of occupying and neighbouring residents.

Traffic Generation, Access and Parking Policy review

9.35 Policy 6.3 of the London Plan confirms that the impact of development proposals on transport

capacity and the transport network are fully assessed. The proposal must comply with policies cycling (Policy 6.9), walking (Policy 6.10), tackling congestion (Policy 6.11) and parking (Policy 6.13). Policies DMD45 and DMD47 provide the criteria upon which developments will be assessed with regard to parking standards / layout and access / servicing.

9.36 Policy DMD 45 (Parking Standards and Layout) and DMD48 (Transport Assessments) seeks to minimise car parking and to promote sustainable transport options. The Council recognises that a flexible and balanced approach needs to be adopted to prevent excessive car parking provision while at the same time recognising that low on-site provision sometimes increases pressure on existing streets. Vehicle parking provision

9.37 The lawful certificate permitted 272 spaces across the site, accessed off Wharf Road. The proposed layout of the site would include 99 x van spaces, 1 x staff bay, 2 x motorcycle spaces and 10 x cycle spaces. The proposal would therefore result in a significant reduction (-63%) of parking spaces across the site, and given the parking is for operational purposes, the level proposed is appropriate.

9.38 The proposal indicates all storage spaces shall be capable of accommodating Electric Vehicles, with 20% ‘active’, an actual socket connected to the electrical supply system that vehicle owners can plug their vehicle into, whilst the remaining 80% shall be ‘passive’, whereby the network of cables and power supply necessary shall be installed so that at a future date a socket can be added easily”.

Vehicle access

9.39 Access to the site will remain as existing, off Wharf Road, albeit with additional entry measures including pop-up bollards and controlled gates. Although traffic speeds on Wharf Road are limited to 30mph speed, visibility splays of 2.4m x 43m to the west and 2.4m x 33m shall be secured to ensure vehicles stopping, slowing and turning onto or from the application site, which would not

give rise to conditions prejudicial to the free flow and safety of vehicular traffic and unsafe pedestrian movements. Servicing

9.40 The site could be serviced from within the main car park, although service requirements will be minimal given the proposed use of the site.

9.41 The applicant is advised that the proposal would be required to satisfy Building Regulations and/or

Fire Certification.

Traffic Generation

9.42 In support of the application, a Transport Assessment has been submitted and provides an overview of the level of traffic generated by the existing site, which has been compared to the proposed level of traffic, estimated using the TRICS database to compare with similar sites, with an overall trip rate generated from the census data.

9.43 The assessment indicates 100 workers are expected to use the site and arrive to drive the

distribution vehicles. Census data has been examined and for this Enfield area, 64% of workers use cars as the main mode of transport. This is accepted as a robust assumption, and equated to 64 vehicular trips in, and 64 out of the site.

9.44 Workers are expected to arrive on the site between 05:30 and 08:30. This is due to the operational

needs of the distribution warehouse, which is located approximately 1 mile to the north east at Stockingswater Lane. Workers would then return to the application site between 17:00-19:00 to collect their (personal) car and leave. Based on the above scenario, there would be 64 (personal) vehicles arriving on the site between 05:30-08:30, and then 100 vans leaving the site in the same period. Between 16:00-19:00, 100 vans would return and any worker who drove to the application site would leave in their (personal) car.

9.45 Based on the potential baseline of the existing site, this significantly lower level of trip use indicated

in the Transport Assessment is acceptable, particularly when assessed using TRICS data for similar sites.

Cycle parking

9.46 The proposal includes a total of 10 secured and covered cycle parking spaces which meets the relevant policy requirements and shall be secured by way of condition. Conclusion

9.47 The proposal would not cause any unacceptable harm upon highway safety or the flow of traffic in the locality. The proposal therefore complies with Policies DMD45 and DMD47.

Sustainable Design and Construction

Policy review

9.48 London Plan policies 5.2 and 5.3 and policies DMD 51: Energy Efficiency Standards seek to secure energy efficiencies and reduce the emissions of CO2. Policy DMD49 of the Development Management Document states that all new development must achieve the highest sustainable design and construction standards having regard to technical feasibility and economic viability. Policy DMD61 (Managing Surface Water) expects a Drainage Strategy will be required for all developments to demonstrate how proposed measures manage surface water as close to its source as possible and follow the drainage hierarchy in the London Plan.

Energy

9.49 Due to the scale of the development, a total of 162 sqm of floorspace (uplift of 72sqm), the proposal would not trigger the policy requirement for an environmental assessment, in addition, the scale of the buildings proposed limit the scope for significant mitigation measures such as the use of zero and low carbon technology.

9.50 The proposal would however see a far more sustainable operation in respect of carbon emissions reduction. The proposal indicates all storage spaces shall be capable of accommodating Electric Vehicles, with 20% ‘active’, an actual socket connected to the electrical supply system that vehicle owners can plug their vehicle into, whilst the remaining 80% shall be ‘passive’, whereby the network of cables and power supply necessary shall be installed so that at a future date a socket can be added easily”.

9.51 The applicant indicates, the life‐cycle carbon emissions of a diesel van are 11,533kg CO2e annually, this would be reduced to 3,933 kg CO2e (-60%) annually by an electric vehicle, including emissions from manufacturing the vehicle, the fuel production, the tailpipe and the power plants that make the electricity in the UK. The aim of the operator is also to power 100% of its operations with renewable energy by 2030.

Conclusion

9.52 The operation of the site would have appropriate regard to environmental sustainability issues including energy and water conservation, renewable energy generation, and efficient resource use.

Sustainability and Sustainable Drainage Systems (SuDS) Policy review

9.53 London Plan policies 5.12 and 5.13 require the consideration of the effects of development on flood risk and sustainable drainage respectively. Core Policy 28 (“Managing flood risk through development”) confirms the Council’s approach to flood risk, inclusive of the requirement for SuDS in all developments. Policy DMD59 (“Avoiding and reducing flood risk”) confirms that new development must avoid and reduce the risk of flooding, and not increase the risks elsewhere and that Planning permission will only be granted for proposals which have addressed all sources of flood risk and would not be subject to, or result in unacceptable levels of flood risk on site or increase the level of flood risk to third parties.

9.54 DMD61 (“Managing surface water”) requires the submission of a drainage strategy that incorporates an appropriate SuDS scheme and appropriate runoff rates.

9.55 The proposed development falls within Flood Zone 2, which is land at risk of flooding. Consequently, in support of the application, a Flood Risk Assessment has been submitted and demonstrates the following: • The 0.78-hectare (ha) site is a former car park, comprised mostly of hardstanding areas with some landscaped areas around the northern boundary. • The site is mostly level and is underlain by superficial deposits which may support shallow (perched) ground water, above clayey bedrock with low infiltration potential. Made Ground is also likely to be present. • The River Lee Navigation and the River Lea/Lee convey flows south to the west and east of the site, respectively. • The risk of flooding was assessed as follows:

o Register the site with the Environment Agency’s Floodline service. o Prepare a Flood Warning and Evacuation Plan for the Site.

o The fencing around the Site should prevent any vehicles from floating and entering the bounding watercourses. o Utilise flood resilient construction techniques as for onsite buildings, which allow the buildings to be operational soon after a flood event. o No below ground buildings. o Set finished floor levels of buildings above external levels. o Sealed surface water system to prevent groundwater ingress. o Adoption of a surface water management strategy.

9.56 The Environment Agency, in review, consider this application as a ‘lower risk’ development and have no objection to the proposed development. Standing advice was however issued including the potential requirement of a flood risk activity permit, safe access and egress and risks from floating vehicles during a flood event.

9.57 The Canal & River Trust (whom own and manage the River Lee Navigation), raise no objection in

principle but require further details regarding a number of matters including drainage. These are technical issues and it is considered appropriate to address these by way of conditions.

9.58 Regarding accessibility and signage, this offered condition seeks improvements to the adjacent

Lee Navigation towpath and underpass that are outside of the development site and the level of control is considered to go beyond the remit of a planning condition.

9.59 The SuDs Team also raise no objection subject to several conditions including SuDS management

and foul drainage arrangements.

Conclusion

9.60 In summary, the Flood Risk Assessment and Drainage strategy submitted in support of the planning application provides some useful information at this stage, however more detailed technical information is required and subject to the imposition of conditions, the proposal is considered acceptable. Landscaping and Trees Policy review

9.61 Policy DMD 80 and DMD 81 ensures development must provide high quality landscaping that enhances the local environment.

9.62 The site contains a number of trees across the site, with the majority are however located along

the boundary. All trees on site, however, fall outside of a conservation area and no trees are covered with a designation (Trees in the conservation areas are statutorily protected - Tree Preservation Order). Tree protection / retention measures

9.63 The proposal results in the removal of 1 tree:

• 1 Goat Willow (T7 semi mature) – located to the centre north of the site

9.64 In replacement, 3 native deciduous trees around the boundaries are to be planted, thereby

increasing the biodiversity value of the site, and to complement the surrounding landscape:

• 2 young cherry and 1 field maple trees (18-20cm Girth/4.4 to 5m high)

9.65 The age and visual amenity of the trees are such that their replacement around the site is considered acceptable.

9.66 With respect to all other trees and those in close proximity to the development works, conditions shall secure their protection against damage throughout the period of building and other operations.

9.67 With regard to landscaping, given the site is primarily covered with hardstanding and its intended purpose, the scope to introduce soft landscaping is limited, in support of the application however, the applicant has provided a detailed landscaping proposal to introduce mixed native hedge growing, flowering meadow grassland, ornamental planting beds and native bulb planting to the north section of the site and along its boundary. Conclusion

9.68 The proposal would retain and protect trees of amenity value, whilst providing appropriate

replacement. The proposal therefore complies with Policies DMD78, DMD79, DMD80 and DMD81.

Biodiversity / Ecology

Policy review

9.69 Policy 7.19 of the London Plan (“Biodiversity and access to nature”) requires development

proposals to make a positive contribution, where possible, to the protection, enhancement, creation and management of biodiversity. Core Policy 36 of the Core Strategy confirms that all developments should be seeking to protect, restore, and enhance sites. Policies DMD78 and DMD79 advise that onsite ecological enhancements should be made, alongside high quality landscaping that enhances the local environment.

9.70 There are 2 statutory and 4 non-statutory designated sites within 2 km of the application site. Both

of the statutory designated sites are Sites of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) and all four of the non-statutory are Sites of Importance for Nature Conservation (SINCs) and include:

• Epping Forest (SSSI and SINC), located 1.5km to the east of the site • Lee Valley (SINC), located around all aspects of the site immediately beyond the

boundaries • Chingford Reservoirs (SSSI) located directly beyond the eastern boundary • Mansfield Park (SINC) located 1.6 km south-east of the site • Sewardstone Road Rough (SINC) located 1.25 km east of the site

9.71 The majority of the site comprises hardstanding with the boundaries fenced on all aspects. Dense

scrub and scattered broadleaved trees have overgrown the fencing onto the site. A single building is located in the southwestern aspect of the site.

9.72 In support of the application, a Preliminary Ecological Appraisal has been provided for the purposes of habitat types and dominant plant species found at the site. Birds

9.73 10 species of birds (currently listed on the Wildlife and Countryside Act 1981) have been recorded within 2 km of the site. It is not anticipated that the on-site habitats would support any of these species.

9.74 A further 16 species of birds (currently listed on the Red List of Birds of Conservation Concern) were recorded within 2 km of the site in the past ten years. Extensive wetland bird records were provided within the data search, however, given the small size of the site and lack of wetland habitat it is unlikely these species would utilise it.

9.75 The scattered broadleaved trees and dense scrub offer suitable habitats for nesting bird opportunities. No bird nesting activity however was observed at the time of the inspection. Great Crested Newts

9.76 No data indicates any records of GCN or other amphibians within 2 km of the site centre in the past 10 years. The site offers limited habitat with the only suitable sheltering opportunities for GCN within the dense scrub on the site boundaries. The River Lea navigation and Reservoir overflow are not considered suitable to support GCNs as they are within concrete channels that would not enable GCNs to disperse into/ out of the waterbodies. The Lea Valley SINC that is located immediately beyond all boundaries of the site is known to support GCNs, however, given that it covers 947 ha it is anticipated that they occur within areas of suitable habitat outside the search area. Reptiles

9.77 No data indicates any records of reptiles to be within 2 km of the site centre within the past 10 years. No evidence of reptiles was recorded on the site. Due to the lack of records and suitable habitat, reptiles are not considered to be a constraint at this site. Bats

9.78 11 records of bat species were recorded to be within 2 km of the site in the past 10 years. The site does not contain any trees with any bat roost potential (BRP) features. The site contains limited suitable foraging and commuting habitat associated with the scrub scattered around the boundaries, whilst there are more suitable habitats immediately off-site associated within the SINC. Badgers

9.79 No data indicates any records of badgers to be within 2 km of the site within the past 10 years. The site did not support any evidence to indicate that badgers were using or inhabiting it. The site lacks suitable habitat for badgers and generally the wider area also lacks suitable habitats. Due to the lack of habitat on-site and within the wider landscape, badgers are not considered a constraint. Otters

9.80 5 records of otters were recorded to be within 2 km of the site centre. The most recent record in 2013 was located 1.63 km south of the site. Due to the lack of any suitable habitat on-site for otters they are not considered a constraint and are not considered further Other Protected Species

9.81 8 records of hedgehog were recorded to be within 2 km of the site in the past 10 years. The closest record in 2014 was located 1.08 km west of the site. The site habitats offer limited suitable habitat for this species, being predominantly hardstanding, such that hedgehogs are not considered a constraint.

9.82 In respect of habitats, the site comprises low ecological value habitats in the form of dense scrub, young and semimature scattered trees, whilst the hard standing, fencing and building are of negligible ecological value.

9.83 In respect of species, the site does not contain suitable habitats to host birds, bats or protected species such as badgers or reptiles, however the scattered broadleaved trees and dense scrub bordering the site offers suitable opportunities for birds and bats.

9.84 There are opportunities to enhance the site for wildlife, therefore a condition shall ensure that

enhancements for wildlife are provided within the new development.

Lighting strategy

9.85 In support of the application, a lighting strategy assessment has been provided, indicating LED units, mounted on tubular steel columns at a maximum of 6m above the finished external ground level. The lighting shall be functional and directional and in line with current guidance by the Bat Conservation Trust (BCT) and Institution for Lighting Professionals (ILP) and has been designed to minimise the number of luminaires used and provide only the lighting levels required for safe access and use of the site, while also recognising the location, ecological and wildlife requirements. Further details however shall be secured by way of condition, in consultation with Natural England. Conclusion

9.86 The proposal would have appropriate regard to the site and wider ecological assets. The proposal

therefore complies with Policies DMD78 and DMD79. Archaeology

9.87 The site is located within an Archaeology Priority Area. In support of the application, an Archaeological Desk Based Assessment has been submitted indicating the site has been assessed for its below ground archaeological potential and has identified a generally low archaeological potential at the study site. An informative shall however be imposed in order to minimise damage to potential archaeological remains which could exist on this site. Contamination

9.88 An Environmental Impact Assessment Screening Opinion Request in 2018 (18/03209/SO), indicated the existing site is not considered to be contaminated. Any remediation works could be secured through planning condition, however. In support of the application, a Preliminary Geo-Environmental Risk Assessment indicates no potential sources of contamination have been identified at the site. Overhead power lines (OHL Zone)

9.89 An overhead electricity cable passes directly over the site orientated north to south with a second cable and set of pylons located 50m to the east. Cadent Gas Line Limited (National Grid), indicate significant clearance underneath for development, beneath a decommissioned cable (National Grid do not have live assets in this location).

Community Infrastructure Levy (CIL)

CIL 9.90 As of the April 2010, legislation in the form of CIL Regulations 2010 (as amended) came into force

which would allow ‘charging authorities’ in England and Wales to apportion a levy on net additional floorspace for certain types of qualifying development to enable the funding of a wide range of infrastructure that is needed as a result of development.

Mayoral CIL 9.91 The Mayor of London charges CIL in Enfield at the rate of £60 per sqm. In this instance the

development is not CIL liable.

Enfield CIL 9.92 As of 1st April 2016, Enfield has been charging CIL. In this instance the development is CIL liable

at the rate of £40 per sqm (Lower Rate Eastern Zone). In this instance the development is not CIL liable.

10. Conclusion

10.1 The proposed development would support the jobs and economic activity with the Borough andalthough located within the green belt, the lawful use of the site and the existing character of thelocality is such that when assessed against the relevant policy tests, it is considered that theproposal would not result in undue harm to the character and openness of the Green Beltespecially when the befits are taken into account associated with the vacant industrial land.

10.2 The proposal, by virtue of its siting and scale, is considered appropriate and would not result indetrimental harm to the character and appearance of the wider area nor would it harm the amenityneighbouring residents. Furthermore, the proposal would not cause any unacceptable harm uponhighway safety or the flow of traffic in the locality

10.3 It is also considered the operation of the site would have appropriate regard to environmentalsustainability issues including energy and water conservation, renewable energy generation, andefficient resource use. It would also retain and protect trees of amenity value, whilst providingappropriate replacement and have regard to the site and wider ecological assets.

10.4 Having regard also to the mitigation secured by the recommended conditions, it is considered theproposed development is acceptable when assessed against the suite of relevant planningpolicies and that planning permission should be granted subject to conditions.

Overflow Channel

M

a

r

in

a

F

B

1

2

Post

M

o

P

M

o

P

s

S

o

u

th

Is

la

n

d

2

W

h

a

r

f

R

o

a

d

RIVER LEE NAVIGATION

W

H

A

R

F

R

O

A

D

R

I

V

E

R

L

E

E

O

R

L

E

A

Architects are to be notified of any discrepancies.

Contractors must check all dimensions on site.

This drawing is subject to copyright laws and is for use on this project only.

This drawing is to be used solely for the information as titled only.

For other information refer to the latest revision of any cross referenced drawings.

To be read in conjunction with relevant design standards/protocols.

T: 01423 856999

WWW.SSA-ARCHITECTS.CO.UK

HARROGATE, N.YORKSHIRE, HG1 5PX

CRAVEN LODGE, VICTORIA AVENUE,

SCALE:DATE:

JOB NO: DRG NO: REVISION:

SHEET SIZE:

DRAWING TITLE:

PROJECT ADDRESS:

PROJECT NAME:

CLIENT:

STATUS:

REV

#

DATE

FIRST ISSUE

DESCRIPTION

AMENDMENTS

DRN CKD

Architects are to be notified of any discrepancies.

Contractors must check all dimensions on site.

This drawing is subject to copyright laws and is for use on this project only.

This drawing is to be used solely for the information as titled only.

For other information refer to the latest revision of any cross referenced drawings.

To be read in conjunction with relevant design standards/protocols.

PLANNING

LYSANDER

VSF ENFIELD

LAND SOUTH OF WHARF

ROAD, ENFIELD

TOPOGRAPHICAL SURVEY

INFORMATION

20-6466 P03 #

JUN 2020 1:200 A0

18/06/20 JML MA

#

SCALE BAR

METRES

0M510152025 25

N

o

r

th

50.61

50.62

Overflow Channel

M

a

r

in

a

E

l S

u

b

S

ta

F

B

1

2

Post

M

o

P

M

o

P

s

S

o

u

th

Is

la

n

d

W

h

a

r

f

R

o

a

d

RIVER LEE NAVIGATION

W

H

A

R

F

R

O

A

D

R

I

V

E

R

L

E

E

O

R

L

E

A

BIKE SHED

EXISTING GATE

EXTENT OF OVERHEAD CABLES

STAIRS

EXISTING ENCLOSURE

EXISTING FENCE

EXISTING STEEL PALISADE FENCING AND GATE

LIGHTING COLUMN

LIGHTING COLUMN

LIGHTING COLUMN

LIGHTING COLUMN

LIGHTING COLUMN

LIGHTING COLUMNS

LIGHTING COLUMN

LIGHTING COLUMNS

HISTORIC PETROL INTERCEPTOR:

NOT ACCESSIBLE FOR DETAILED

SURVEY

DARK GREY REGION DENOTES

EXISTING HARDSTANDING ON

SITE

MID YELLOW REGION DENOTES MIXED AREA

OF CONCRETE / DENSE FOLIAGE ON SITE

23/06/20 DRB MAA AMENDED IN LINE WITH DWD COMMENTS

N

o

r

th

SCALE BAR

METRES

0M510152025 25

Architects are to be notified of any discrepancies.

Contractors must check all dimensions on site.

This drawing is subject to copyright laws and is for use on this project only.

This drawing is to be used solely for the information as titled only.

For other information refer to the latest revision of any cross referenced drawings.

To be read in conjunction with relevant design standards/protocols.

T: 01423 856999

WWW.SSA-ARCHITECTS.CO.UK

HARROGATE, N.YORKSHIRE, HG1 5PX

CRAVEN LODGE, VICTORIA AVENUE,

SCALE:DATE:

JOB NO: DRG NO: REVISION:

SHEET SIZE:

DRAWING TITLE:

PROJECT ADDRESS:

PROJECT NAME:

CLIENT:

STATUS:

REV

#

DATE

FIRST ISSUE

DESCRIPTION

AMENDMENTS

DRN CKD

Architects are to be notified of any discrepancies.

Contractors must check all dimensions on site.

This drawing is subject to copyright laws and is for use on this project only.

This drawing is to be used solely for the information as titled only.

For other information refer to the latest revision of any cross referenced drawings.

To be read in conjunction with relevant design standards/protocols.

PLANNING

LYSANDER

VSF ENFIELD

LAND SOUTH OF

WHARF ROAD, ENFIELD

EXISTING SITE LAYOUT

20-6466 P02 B

JUN 2020 1:500 A2

25/06/20 DRB MAB AMENDED IN LINE WITH DWD COMMENTS

18/06/20 DRB MAA

M

a

r

in

a

E

l S

u

b

S

ta

F

B

S

h

e

l

t

e

r

1

2

M

o

P

M

o

P

s

e

r

L

e

a

o

r

L

e

e

S

o

u

th

Is

la

n

d

L

e

a

V

a

l

l

e

y

R

o

a

d

(

A

1

1

0

)

W

h

a

r

f

R

o

a

d

Overflow Channel

F

B

S

lu

ic

e

F

B

RIVER LEE NAVIGATION

W

H

A

R

F

R

O

A

D

WILLIAM

GIRLING

RESERVOIR

R

I

V

E

R

L

E

E

O

R

L

E

A

Architects are to be notified of any discrepancies.

Contractors must check all dimensions on site.

This drawing is subject to copyright laws and is for use on this project only.

This drawing is to be used solely for the information as titled only.

For other information refer to the latest revision of any cross referenced drawings.

To be read in conjunction with relevant design standards/protocols.

T: 01423 856999

WWW.SSA-ARCHITECTS.CO.UK

HARROGATE, N.YORKSHIRE, HG1 5PX

CRAVEN LODGE, VICTORIA AVENUE,

SCALE:DATE:

JOB NO: DRG NO: REVISION:

SHEET SIZE:

DRAWING TITLE:

PROJECT ADDRESS:

PROJECT NAME:

CLIENT:

STATUS:

REV

#

DATE

FIRST ISSUE

DESCRIPTION

AMENDMENTS

DRN CKD

Architects are to be notified of any discrepancies.

Contractors must check all dimensions on site.

This drawing is subject to copyright laws and is for use on this project only.

This drawing is to be used solely for the information as titled only.

For other information refer to the latest revision of any cross referenced drawings.

To be read in conjunction with relevant design standards/protocols.

A3

PLANNING

LYSANDER

VSF ENFIELD

LAND SOUTH OF

WHARF ROAD, ENFIELD

SITE LOCATION PLAN

20-6466 P01 B

JUN 2020 1:1250

SCALE BAR

METRES

0M510152025 25

N

o

r

th

18/06/20

19/06/20 DRB MAA AMENDED IN LINE WITH DWD COMMENTS

23/06/20 DRB MAB REDLINE AMENDED TO OMIT SW ENCLOSURE

Front Elevation Left Elevation

33

25

35

00

Roof PlanFloor Plan

3000

3000

Rear Elevation

Roof PlanFloor Plan

4000

30

00

Front Elevation Rear Elevation Left Elevation

33

25

(3

00

0 m

in

cle

ar)

35

00

500.0200.0

100.0

4

5

.

0

°

2450.0

595

1250

FRONT

14

00

SIDE

40

0

1250

TOP

60

0

860

63

5

950

950

95

0

55840

84

0

60

0

860

63

5

950

FRONT/REAR SIDE

PLAN

TOP

26/06/20 DB MA

GRP SUBSTATION

HOUSING

COLOUR: RAL 6005

MOSS GREEN

VENTILATION GRILLE

TO SUBSTATION

SUPPLIER DETAILS

GRP LOCKABLE

DOORS, COLOUR TO

MATCH UNIT

HV / TX SUBSTATION HOUSING LAYOUT

1:50

Architects are to be notified of any discrepancies.

Contractors must check all dimensions on site.

This drawing is subject to copyright laws and is for use on this project only.

This drawing is to be used solely for the information as titled only.

For other information refer to the latest revision of any cross referenced drawings.

To be read in conjunction with relevant design standards/protocols.

T: 01423 856999

WWW.SSA-ARCHITECTS.CO.UK

HARROGATE, N.YORKSHIRE, HG1 5PX

CRAVEN LODGE, VICTORIA AVENUE,

SCALE:DATE:

JOB NO: DRG NO: REVISION:

SHEET SIZE:

DRAWING TITLE:

PROJECT ADDRESS:

PROJECT NAME:

CLIENT:

STATUS:

REV

#

DATE

FIRST ISSUE

DESCRIPTION

AMENDMENTS

DRN CKD

Architects are to be notified of any discrepancies.

Contractors must check all dimensions on site.

This drawing is subject to copyright laws and is for use on this project only.

This drawing is to be used solely for the information as titled only.

For other information refer to the latest revision of any cross referenced drawings.

To be read in conjunction with relevant design standards/protocols.

A1

PLANNING

LYSANDER

VSF ENFIELD

LAND SOUTH OF WHARF

ROAD, ENFIELD

PROPOSED SUBSTATION

DETAILS

20-6466 P09 D

JUN 2020 1:50

A 30/06/20 DB MAAMENDED AS PER DWD COMMENTS

LV SUBSTATION HOUSING LAYOUT

1:50

0M

0.5

1

1.522.5

2.5

SCALE BAR - 1:50

METRES

CHARGING POST

DETAIL

1:50

GRP SUBSTATION

HOUSING

COLOUR: RAL 6005

MOSS GREEN

VENTILATION GRILLE

TO SUBSTATION

SUPPLIER DETAILS

GRP LOCKABLE

DOORS, COLOUR TO

MATCH UNIT

GRP CONTROL PANEL

KIOSK DETAIL

1:50

GRP BLOWER/CONTROL PANEL

KIOSK DETAIL

1:50

GRP KIOSK HOUSING

COLOUR RAL 6005

MOSS GREEN

GRP KIOSK HOUSING

COLOUR RAL 6005

MOSS GREEN

B 02/07/20 DB MAGRP KIOSK PLANS/ELEVATIONS ADDED

LOUVRES TO

FRONT AND

REAR

C 02/07/20 DB MAGRP BLOWER HOUSING AMENDED

D 02/07/20 DB MA1:20 DRAWINGS RESCALED TO 1:50

73

19

2743

Welfare Unit Floor Plan Welfare Unit Roof Plan

2°

Welfare Elevation East Welfare Elevation North

Welfare Elevation West Welfare Elevation South

Flu

e

Welfare Unit Details

Scale 1:50

SCALE BAR

METERS

0M

0.5

1

1.522.5

2.5

SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS

ROOF

PRE-FABRICATED INSULATED PANELS WITH MEMBRANE

COVER - GOOSEWING GREY RAL 080 70 05

EAVES

PRE-FORMED ALUMINIUM FASCIA AND SOFFIT,

COLOUR RAL 7016 ANTHRACITE GREY

WALLS

PRE-FABRICATED INSULATED PANELS

SMOOTH/FLAT - COLOUR RAL 9002 WHITE GREY

WINDOWS

POLYESTER POWDER COATED ALUMINUM CURTAIN

WALLING SYSTEM. COLOUR RAL 7016 ANTHRACITE

GREY

DOORS

PRE-FINISHED COLOUR RAL 180 40 05 MERLIN GREY

Gross External Area: 20 m²

Gross Internal Area: 17.2 m²

ALLOWANCE TO BE MADE FOR

ELECTRICAL CYCLE CHARGING

2150

800

830

4550

2150

FRONT ELEVATION

CYCLE SHELTER PLANS AND ELEVATIONS

1:50

SIDE ELEVATION

SHELTER STEEL FRAME TO BE GALVANISED AND

POWDERCOATED ANTHRACITE, RAL 7016, TO BS

1461:2009

PANELS BETWEEN FRAME TO BE TRANSLUCENT

POLYCARBONATE

STAINLESS STEEL SATIN FINISH CYCLE SHEFFIELD

STAND RACK, BASEPLATE FIXED, BOLTED DOWN

TO SURFACE FINISH.

GALVANISED TO BS EN ISO 1461:2009

PLAN 3D

VIEW

2140

4160

800

3250

EXTENT OF CYCLE RACK

5NO. RACKS CAPABLE OF HOLDING 10 CYCLES,

SECURELY FIXED

2150

4550

2150

FRONT ELEVATION

SMOKING SHELTER PLANS AND ELEVATIONS

1:50

SIDE ELEVATION

PLAN 3D

VIEW

2140

4160

SHELTER STEEL FRAME TO BE GALVANISED AND

POWDERCOATED ANTHRACITE, RAL 7016, TO BS

1461:2009

PANELS BETWEEN FRAME TO BE TRANSLUCENT

POLYCARBONATE

Architects are to be notified of any discrepancies.

Contractors must check all dimensions on site.

This drawing is subject to copyright laws and is for use on this project only.

This drawing is to be used solely for the information as titled only.

For other information refer to the latest revision of any cross referenced drawings.

To be read in conjunction with relevant design standards/protocols.

T: 01423 856999

WWW.SSA-ARCHITECTS.CO.UK

HARROGATE, N.YORKSHIRE, HG1 5PX

CRAVEN LODGE, VICTORIA AVENUE,

SCALE:DATE:

JOB NO: DRG NO: REVISION:

SHEET SIZE:

DRAWING TITLE:

PROJECT ADDRESS:

PROJECT NAME:

CLIENT:

STATUS:

REV

#

DATE

FIRST ISSUE

DESCRIPTION

AMENDMENTS

DRN CKD

Architects are to be notified of any discrepancies.

Contractors must check all dimensions on site.

This drawing is subject to copyright laws and is for use on this project only.

This drawing is to be used solely for the information as titled only.

For other information refer to the latest revision of any cross referenced drawings.

To be read in conjunction with relevant design standards/protocols.

PLANNING

LYSANDER

VSF ENFIELD

LAND SOUTH OF

WHARF ROAD, ENFIELD

CYCLE / SMOKING SHELTER

AND WELFARE UNIT DETAILS

20-6466 P08 A

JUN 2020 1:50 A1

18/06/20 DB MA

24/06/20 DB MAA AMENDED IN LINE WITH DWD COMMENTS

3600

4200

Gatehouse Elevation West Gatehouse Elevation North

Gatehouse Roof Plan

Flu

e

2°

VENT

AC

UNIT

7,110

3600

Gatehouse Elevation South Gatehouse Elevation East

SCALE BAR

METERS

0M

0.5

1

1.522.5

2.5

Gatehouse Floor Plan

4200

7110

SCHEDULE OF MATERIALS

ROOF

KINGSPAN KS1000/2000 RW RIDGE FLASHING TO BE

INSTALLED AND SEALED IN ACCORDANCE WITH

MANUFACTURERS DETAILS

EAVES

PRE-FORMED ALUMINIUM FASCIA AND SOFFIT,

COLOUR RAL 7016 ANTHRACITE GREY

WALLS

PROFILED INSULATED METAL COMPOSITE

CLADDING PANEL SYSTEM,

SMOOTH/FLAT - COLOUR RAL 9002 WHITE GREY

WINDOWS

POLYESTER POWDER COATED ALUMINUM CURTAIN

WALLING SYSTEM. COLOUR RAL 7016 ANTHRACITE

GREY

DOORS

PRE-FINISHED COLOUR RAL 180 40 05 MERLIN GREY

GROSS EXTERNAL AREA: 29.9 m²

GROSS INTERNAL AREA: 26.5 m²

Architects are to be notified of any discrepancies.

Contractors must check all dimensions on site.

This drawing is subject to copyright laws and is for use on this project only.

This drawing is to be used solely for the information as titled only.

For other information refer to the latest revision of any cross referenced drawings.

To be read in conjunction with relevant design standards/protocols.

T: 01423 856999

WWW.SSA-ARCHITECTS.CO.UK

HARROGATE, N.YORKSHIRE, HG1 5PX

CRAVEN LODGE, VICTORIA AVENUE,

SCALE:DATE:

JOB NO: DRG NO: REVISION:

SHEET SIZE:

DRAWING TITLE:

PROJECT ADDRESS:

PROJECT NAME:

CLIENT:

STATUS:

REV

#

DATE

FIRST ISSUE

DESCRIPTION

AMENDMENTS

DRN CKD

Architects are to be notified of any discrepancies.

Contractors must check all dimensions on site.

This drawing is subject to copyright laws and is for use on this project only.

This drawing is to be used solely for the information as titled only.

For other information refer to the latest revision of any cross referenced drawings.

To be read in conjunction with relevant design standards/protocols.

PLANNING

LYSANDER

VSF ENFIELD

LAND SOUTH OF

WHARF ROAD, ENFIELD

PROPOSED GUARD HOUSE

DETAILS

20-6466 P07 A

JUN 2020 1:50 A2

18/06/20 JML MA

A 24/06/20 DRB MAAMENDED IN LINE WITH DWD COMMENTS

F

B

M

o

P

Overflow Channel

LVSS

TX

L

V

S

S

T

X

RIVER LEE NAVIGATION

W

H

A

R

F

R

O

A

D

18/06/20 DB MA

KEY:

Concrete slab

300mm concrete plinth, 300mm

above finished tarmac level to mitigate

risk of flood damage

Vehicle grade tarmac

Landscaped/Vegetation

Tarmac pedestrian area, edged with

HB2 kerb

24/06/20 DB MAA REVISED FOLLOWING DTM

26/06/20 DB MAB REVISED AS PER DWD COMMENTS

N

o

r

th

SCALE BAR

METRES

0M510152025 25

Architects are to be notified of any discrepancies.

Contractors must check all dimensions on site.

This drawing is subject to copyright laws and is for use on this project only.

This drawing is to be used solely for the information as titled only.

For other information refer to the latest revision of any cross referenced drawings.

To be read in conjunction with relevant design standards/protocols.

T: 01423 856999

WWW.SSA-ARCHITECTS.CO.UK

HARROGATE, N.YORKSHIRE, HG1 5PX

CRAVEN LODGE, VICTORIA AVENUE,

SCALE:DATE:

JOB NO: DRG NO: REVISION:

SHEET SIZE:

DRAWING TITLE:

PROJECT ADDRESS:

PROJECT NAME:

CLIENT:

STATUS:

REV

#

DATE

FIRST ISSUE

DESCRIPTION

AMENDMENTS

DRN CKD

Architects are to be notified of any discrepancies.

Contractors must check all dimensions on site.

This drawing is subject to copyright laws and is for use on this project only.

This drawing is to be used solely for the information as titled only.

For other information refer to the latest revision of any cross referenced drawings.

To be read in conjunction with relevant design standards/protocols.

PLANNING

LYSANDER

VSF ENFIELD

LAND SOUTH OF

WHARF ROAD, ENFIELD

PROPOSED EXTERNAL

FINISHES

20-6466 P06 F

JUL 2020 1:500 A2

C 02/07/20 DB MATRIEF KERB AMENDED TO HB2;

CONCRETE BASES FOR KIOSKS

ADDED, CONCRETE PLINTHS FOR

LIGHTING SUBSTATIONS ADDED,

ADJACENT TREE REMOVED

D 02/07/20 DB MAAMENDED AS PER DWD COMMENTS

E 02/07/20 DB MACONCRETE BASE POSITIONS AMENDED

F 06/07/20 DB MAAMENDED AS PER DWD COMMENTS

F

B

Overflow Channel

0

4

9

0

6

4

0

6

3

0

6

2

0

6

1

0

6

0

0

5

9

0

5

8

0

5

7

0

5

6

0

5

5

0

5

4

0

5

3

0

5

2

0

5

1

0

5

0 0

4

3

0

4

2

0

4

1

0

4

0

0

3

9

0

3

8

0

3

7

0

3

6

0

8

5

0

8

6

0

8

7

0

8

8

0

8

9

0

9

0

0

9

1

0

9

2

0

9

3

0

9

4

0

9

5

0

9

6

0

9

7

0

9

8

0

9

9

1

0

0

0

6

6

0

6

7

0

6

8

0

6

9

0

7

0

0

7

1

0

7

2

0

7

3

0

7

4

0

7

5

0

7

6

0

7

7

0

7

8

0

7

9

0

8

0

0

8

1

0

8

2

0

8

3

0

3

2

0

3

1

0

3

0

0

2

9

0

2

8

0

2

7

0

2

6

0

2

5

0

2

4

0

2

3

0

2

2

0

2

1

0

2

0

0

1

9

0

1

8

0

0

2

0

1

6

0

1

7

0

0

3

0

0

4

0

0

5

0

0

6

0

0

7

0

0

8

0

0

9

0

1

0

0

1

1

0

4

4

0

1

5

0

1

4

0

0

1

0

1

2

0

4

8

LVSS

TX

L

V

S

S

T

X

RIVER LEE NAVIGATION

W

H

A

R

F

R

O

A

D

0

6

5

0

1

3

0

3

3

0

4

5

0

3

4

0

3

5

0

4

6

0

4

7

0

8

4

3RD PARTY

GATE TO

ADJOINING

PROPERTY

REQUIRED

POP-UP

BOLLARDS TO

REPLACE

EXISTING GATE

2.4m High SR2 Paladin Fence

MESH & WIRE: 76.2 X 12.5 MM MESH; 4 MM

WIRE, HIGH ALUMINIUM CONTENT

GALVANISED AND POLYESTER POWDER-

COATED TO MINIMUM 80 MICRONS

DOUBLE LAYERED MESH SYSTEM.

POSTS: 80 X 60 MM SPECIAL FLANGED

SECTION, HOT-DIPPED GALVANISED

AFTER MANUFACTURE AND POLYESTER

POWDER-COATED WITH 120 X 6MM FULL

LENGTH CLAMP BAR GALVANISED AND

POLYESTER POWDER-COATED TO

CORNER POSTS: 80 X 80 MM SHS,

GALVANISED AFTER MANUFACTURE AND

POLYESTER POWDER-COATED TO

FIXINGS: M8 CUP SQUARE BOLT WITH

PERMACONE NUT, STAINLESS STEEL

SET POSTS: SET POSTS IN HOLES 300 MM

DIAMETER X 900 MM DEEP, FILLED NOT

LESS THAN HALF THE DEPTH WITH

CONCRETE, AS CLAUSE 620.

MAXIMUM POST CENTERS: 2520MM

BOTTOM OF FENCING TO BE: APPROX. 50

MM ABOVE FINAL GROUND LEVEL.

OTHER REQUIREMENTS: PPC COLOUR

SYSTEM CONFORMS TO:LPS1175 SR2

SECURED BY DESIGN

MARSHALLS RHINO OR SIMILAR HEAVY

DUTY BOLLARD

A CIRCULAR BOLLARD

MANUFACTURED FROM STEEL WITH A

GALVANIZED AND POWDER COATED

FINISH IN BLACK AS STANDARD.

CLASS 2 YELLOW REFLECTIVE TAPES

ARE AN INTEGRAL PART OF THE

BOLLARD TO INCREASE VISIBILITY.

BASEPLATE FIXED.

HEAVY DUTY

BOLLARDS

FGL

1000

100

ø194

MATERIAL AND FINISH:

MILD STEEL (S235), GALVANIZED

AND POWDER COATED (5 BANDS)

CAP:

WELDED SEMI DOMED

DIMENSIONS:

HEIGHT 1000MM FROM FFL

DIAMETER OF 196MM

WALL THICKNESS 5MM

FIXING:

BASE PLATE WITH 4No. CHEMICALLY

ANCHORED BOLTS

FENCE PLAN

Panel joint

90° CORNER DETAIL

Panel joint

2515

1257

419 419 419

419

419

Intermediate Post

Reinforcing Channel

Minimum 300 x 300 x 300mm

Foundation

Minimum 300 x 300 x 750mm

Foundation

80 x 80 x 3mm

flanged steel corner

post

6 x 120mm

clamp bars

156

Corner post clamp

bar to primary

post against

structure

419

1257

MATCH FENCING

MATCH FENCING.

BLACK RAL 9005.

GL

900mm min

50

Hi-speed Bi-Folding access gates

2400

Construction

Rectangular Hollow Section. Frame 80mm

SHS, Stanchions 150mm to 250mm SHS

Mesh in-fill to gate leafs, finishes as per

framework

Spans (between posts)

Single gate 3.75m wide.

Double gates at 6m, 8.2m and 8.5m

Operating Speed Approx. 7.0 seconds

Standard Opening 90 Degrees

Manual Operation Included as Standard

Finish Zinc plated and polyester powder

coated (RAL 9005)

Control Options TBA Card, Radio, Intercom,

Push Button, Vehicle Transponder, Induction

Loop and Photocell

Approved Standards BS EN 12453:2001 and

BS EN 12445:2001

3750

FOUNDATIONS TO ENGINEER'S DETAIL

GRAVEL BOARD BRACKETS,

100 x 100 x 12mm Ø HOLE IN

CENTRE OF PLATE

100

300

100

450

100

650

1700

LEGEND

1. CAPPING, 2400 x 175 x 50, WEATHERED

2. TOP RAIL, 2400 x 100 x 100

3. RAILS, 2400 x 100 x 100, WEATHERED

4. GRAVEL BOARD, 2400 x 200 x 50, REBATED

AND WEATHERED, CLEATS 150 x 50 x 38 x

12mm Ø

5. UB 178 x 102 x 19; ON BASE PLATE

6. BOARDS, 2225 AND 2200 x 150 x 25, LAPPED

AND STAGGERED 25mm

7. BASEPLATE, 350 x 350 x 20

8. 6mm PLATE WELDED INTO FLANGES OF

BEAM W/ 12mm Ø HOLE (50 x 60 FROM

EDGES OF PLATE)

5

200

450

100

450

100

300

100

1700

1

2

3

5

6

3

4

DETAILS BASED ON BS1722 PART 5

TYPE BW 180 B

ALL TIMBER TREATED TO BS5589

CAT A 40 YEAR LIFE

ALL TIMBER SPECIES TO BE IN

ACCORDANCE WITH BS5589 CAT A

40 YEAR LIFE

6 3

1.7m Acoustic Closeboard Fence

17/06/20 DB MA

Architects are to be notified of any discrepancies.

Contractors must check all dimensions on site.

This drawing is subject to copyright laws and is for use on this project only.

This drawing is to be used solely for the information as titled only.

For other information refer to the latest revision of any cross referenced drawings.

To be read in conjunction with relevant design standards/protocols.

T: 01423 856999

WWW.SSA-ARCHITECTS.CO.UK

HARROGATE, N.YORKSHIRE, HG1 5PX

CRAVEN LODGE, VICTORIA AVENUE,

SCALE:DATE:

JOB NO: DRG NO: REVISION:

SHEET SIZE:

DRAWING TITLE:

PROJECT ADDRESS:

PROJECT NAME:

CLIENT:

STATUS:

REV

#

DATE

FIRST ISSUE

DESCRIPTION

AMENDMENTS

DRN CKD

Architects are to be notified of any discrepancies.

Contractors must check all dimensions on site.

This drawing is subject to copyright laws and is for use on this project only.

This drawing is to be used solely for the information as titled only.

For other information refer to the latest revision of any cross referenced drawings.

To be read in conjunction with relevant design standards/protocols.

PLANNING

LYSANDER

VSF ENFIELD

LAND SOUTH OF

WHARF ROAD, ENFIELD

PROPOSED BOUNDARY

TREATMENT

20-6466 P05 B

JUN 2020 1:50 A2

SITE PLAN KEY

1:500

FENCE AND

BOLLARD DETAILS

1:50

N

o

rth

ENTRANCE GATE

DETAILS

1:50

0M

0.5

1

1.522.5

2.5

SCALE BAR

METRES

A 24/06/20 DB MAAMENDED AS PER DWD COMMENTS

B 06/07/20 DB MAAMENDED AS PER DWD COMMENTS

M

a

r

in

a

F

B

1

2

M

o

P

M

o

P

s

S

o

u

th

Is

la

n

d

L

e

a

V

a

l

l

e

y

R

o

a

d

(

A

1

1

0

)

W

h

a

r

f

R

o

a

d

Overflow Channel

F

B

S

lu

ic

e

F

B

Overflow Channel

0

4

9

0

6

4

0

6

3

0

6

2

0

6

1

0

6

0

0

5

9

0

5

8

0

5

7

0

5

6

0

5

5

0

5

4

0

5

3

0

5

2

0

5

1

0

5

0 0

4

3

0

4

2

0

4

1

0

4

0

0

3

9

0

3

8

0

3

7

0

3

6

0

8

5

0

8

6

0

8

7

0

8

8

0

8

9

0

9

0

0

9

1

0

9

2

0

9

3

0

9

4

0

9

5

0

9

6

0

9

7

0

9

8

0

9

9

1

0

0

0

6

6

0

6

7

0

6

8

0

6

9

0

7

0

0

7

1

0

7

2

0

7

3

0

7

4

0

7

5

0

7

6

0

7

7

0

7

8

0

7

9

0

8

0

0

8

1

0

8

2

0

8

3

0

3

2

0

3

1

0

3

0

0

2

9

0

2

8

0

2

7

0

2

6

0

2

5

0

2

4

0

2

3

0

2

2

0

2

1

0

2

0

0

1

9

0

1

8

0

0

2

0

1

6

0

1

7

0

0

3

0

0

4

0

0

5

0

0

6

0

0

7

0

0

8

0

0

9

0

1

0

0

1

1

0

4

4

0

1

5

0

1

4

0

0

1

0

1

2

0

4

8

LVSS

TX

L

V

S

S

T

X

RIVER LEE NAVIGATION

W

H

A

R

F

R

O

A

D

R

I

V

E

R

L

E

E

O

R

L

E

A

0

6

5

0

1

3

0

3

3

0

4

5

0

3

4

0

3

5

0

4

6

0

4

7

0

8

4

GRP CONTROL PANEL

KIOSK, 1.25 x 0.4 x 1.25m,

ON 1.45 x 0.6m CONCRETE

PLINTH

OVERHEAD CABLE

POSITIONS

EXISTING ACCESS/EGRESS

JUNCTION TO BE RETAINED.

EXISTING WIRE LINK BOUNDARY FENCE TO BE

REMOVED, REPLACED WITH NEW

2.4M HIGH PALADIN FENCE

EXISTING WIRE LINK

BOUNDARY FENCE TO BE

REMOVED, REPLACED

WITH NEW

2.4M HIGH METAL PALADIN

FENCE

EXISTING WIRE LINK BOUNDARY FENCE TO BE

REMOVED, REPLACED WITH NEW

2.4M HIGH METAL PALADIN FENCE

EXISTING WIRE LINK

BOUNDARY FENCE TO BE

REMOVED, REPLACED WITH

NEW 2.4M HIGH METAL PALADIN

FENCE

EXISTING LANDSCAPED AREA TO BE

RETAINED AND ENHANCED AS

DETAILED ON THE SUBMITTED

LANDSCAPING PLAN

PROPOSED NEW

SUBSTATION LOCATIONS

EXISTING ACCESS ROAD

MAINTAINED, MADE GOOD

WHERE NECESSARY. NEW

FOOTPATH TO BE INSTALLED

TO SINGLE SIDE

NEW LOW LEVEL RETAINING WALL

PROPOSED NEW GATE

HOUSE WITH ACCESS

CONTROL VEHICLE AND

PEDESTRIAN GATES TO

BOTH SIDES

NEW VEHICLE AUTO

RAISE BARRIERS

PROPOSED BICYCLE

SHELTER

NEW SMOKING

SHELTER

PROPOSED NEW WELFARE UNIT

WITH OFFICE, CANTEEN AND

TOILET FACILITIES

EXISTING BOUNDARY RETAINING

STRUCTURE TO BE MAINTAINED

OVERHEAD CABLE

POSITIONS

POSITION OF LV SUBSTATION

AND TRANSFORMER FOR EV

CHARGING, WITH ARMCO

PROTECTION

MOTORCYCLE PARKING

PROPOSED POSITION OF

LV SUBSTATION AND

TRANSFORMER WITH

ARMCO PROTECTION

R

1

0

0

0

0

1.7m-HIGH

ACOUSTIC FENCE,

TO SIT INBOARD

OF PALADIN

BOUNDARY

FENCE

1No PARKING SPACE FOR

GUARD HUT ATTENDANT

E

: 5

3

6

4

1

3

.7

3

9

N

: 1

9

5

4

4

5

.2

7

1

E

: 5

3

6

4

5

5

.3

4

6

N

: 1

9

5

4

4

4

.7

5

3

E

: 5

3

6

3

8

1

.6

9

1

N

: 1

9

3

3

0

7

.7

6

9

E

: 5

3

6

4

1

4

.5

4

6

N

: 1

9

5

3

0

3

.8

0

0

STORAGE AREA FOR REFUSE/

RECYCLABLE WASTE BINS

POP-UP

BOLLARDS TO

REPLACE

EXISTING GATE

UNDERGROUND SEWAGE

TREATMENT PLANT

BLOWER AND CONTROL

PANEL HOUSING, 1.2 x 1.2

x 0.4m, ON 1.4 x 1.4m

CONCRETE PLINTH

ARMCO BARRIER TO

FOLLOW KERB RADIUS,

FOR PROTECTION OF

PUMP/TREATMENT

EQUIPMENT

REMOVABLE HEAVY-DUTY

BOLLARDS, TO FACILITATE

PLANT MAINTENANCE

- DENOTES LIGHTING

COLUMN, AS SPECIFIED

BY SPECIALIST: PLEASE

SEE M&E CONSULTANT'S

DRAWINGS FOR

DETAILED INFORMATION

/ SPEC

- DENOTES 1.7m-HIGH

ACOUSTIC CLOSE

BOARDED FENCE

- DENOTES 2.4m-HIGH

PALADIN SR2 RATED

FENCE

- DENOTES MARSHALLS

RHINO OR SIMILAR

HEAVY-DUTY BOLLARD

- DENOTES ZONE FOR

ACTIVE EV CHARGING

POINTS

FENCE

N

o

r

th

SCALE BAR

METRES

0M510152025 25

Architects are to be notified of any discrepancies.

Contractors must check all dimensions on site.

This drawing is subject to copyright laws and is for use on this project only.

This drawing is to be used solely for the information as titled only.

For other information refer to the latest revision of any cross referenced drawings.

To be read in conjunction with relevant design standards/protocols.

T: 01423 856999

WWW.SSA-ARCHITECTS.CO.UK

HARROGATE, N.YORKSHIRE, HG1 5PX

CRAVEN LODGE, VICTORIA AVENUE,

SCALE:DATE:

JOB NO: DRG NO: REVISION:

SHEET SIZE:

DRAWING TITLE:

PROJECT ADDRESS:

PROJECT NAME:

CLIENT:

STATUS:

REV

#

DATE

FIRST ISSUE

DESCRIPTION

AMENDMENTS

DRN CKD

Architects are to be notified of any discrepancies.

Contractors must check all dimensions on site.

This drawing is subject to copyright laws and is for use on this project only.

This drawing is to be used solely for the information as titled only.

For other information refer to the latest revision of any cross referenced drawings.

To be read in conjunction with relevant design standards/protocols.

PLANNING

LYSANDER

VSF ENFIELD

LAND SOUTH OF

WHARF ROAD, ENFIELD

PROPOSED SITE LAYOUT

20-6466 P04 K

JUN 2020 1:500 A2

A 11/06/20 DB MAAMENDED AS PER INTERNAL REVIEW

B 12/06/20 JL MAGENERAL UPDATES

C 16/06/20 DB MAAMENDED AS PER CONSULTANT COMMENTS

D 19/06/20 DB MAAMENDED IN LINE WITH DWD COMMENTS

10/06/20 DB MA

E 22/06/20 DB MAAMENDED AS PER DESIGN TEAM COMMENTS

F 24/06/20 DB MAAMENDED FOLLOWING DTM

G 25/06/20 DB MAAMENDED IN LINE WITH DWD COMMENTS

H 02/07/20 DB MAADDED BLOWER & CONTROL PANEL

GRP HOUSING: 1200W X 1200D X

850H;FLYGT GRP CONTROL PANEL

KIOSKS: 1250W X 400D X 1250H.

REMOVED TREE ADJACENT TO

SUBSTATIONS BY ENTRANCE.

I 02/07/20 DB MAAMENDED AS PER DWD COMMENTS

J 02/07/20 DB MABLOWER AND KIOSK POSITIONS AMENDED

K 06/07/20 DB MAAMENDED AS PER DWD COMMENTS