logistics systems analysis mid-term review
DESCRIPTION
Logistics Systems Analysis Mid-Term Review. John H. Vande Vate Spring, 2001. Supply Chain Costs Holding Waiting Rent Moving Handling Transport EOQ Trade off Holding and Moving Costs cQ + d/Q minimized with Q = d/c. Subjects Covered. Project Inventory Analysis Modeling - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
11
Logistics Systems AnalysisMid-Term Review
John H. Vande Vate
Spring, 2001
22
Subjects Covered• Supply Chain Costs
– Holding• Waiting• Rent
– Moving • Handling• Transport
• EOQ– Trade off Holding and Moving Costs– cQ + d/Q minimized with Q = d/c
33
Subjects Covered• Project
– Inventory Analysis– Modeling
• Inventory Analysis– At the Plant
• Shipments of size Q to DC– Inventory at plant per shipment: (Q/2)*(Q/P)
– Shipments per year: D/Q
– Total Inventory: (Q/2)*(D/P) + Q/2
– EOQ: minimize fD/Q + h(Q/2)*(1+D/P)
– Q* = (2fD/h)P/(P+D)
44
Project • Inventory Analysis
– Plant to Warehouse• Inventory at plant per shipment: (Q/2)(Q/P)
• Shipments per year: unknown
• Shipments generated by DC served through warehouse: D/Q
• Total Plant inventory per DC served through warehouse: (Q/2)(D/P)
• EOQ to warehouse:
Q* = (2fDw/h)P/(P+Dw) but what’s Dw?
55
Warehouse Inventory• Inbound
– Q/2 from each plant that serves it
• Outbound– “Option” or mix of items shipped together
– Total Demand at warehouse for Assembly: DO
– “Production Rate” of Option at Warehouse: DO
– Inventory per shipment to DC: (Q/2)(Q/DO)
– Shipments per year: D/Q
– EOQ: min fD/Q + h(Q/2)(1 + D/DO)
Q* = (2fD/h)DO/(DO +D) but what’s DO?
66
Outbound Inventory to DC• Inventory per shipment to DC: (Q/2)(Q/DO)
• Shipments per year: D/Q
• Inventory per year: (Q/2)(D/DO) if served with this option
• DO= Sum of Demands at DC’s served with this option
• If Shipment size Q for this option is relatively constant across the DC’s
• Total Outbound Inventory Cost for the Option is (average Q/2)*[Do we serve any DC with this option?]
77
Modeling “Rules”
• Use meaningful (helpful) names
• Comment extensively
• Keep data and model separate
• Keep model general where possible
88
“Finance”
• Capital Utilization influences financial performance
• Total Capital influences Capital Utilization
• Inventory Levels contribute to Capital
• Cash-to-Cash Cycle influences Capital
• Value of Inventory Savings
99
1-1 Distribution• Extension of EOQ to variable demand
– Simple formula for headways:H(t) = (2Fixed/cD’(t))
– Estimate of Total Cost– Reconstructing implementable headways
t D'(t) D(t) H(t) Integral of H(t)t*t h Integral of H(t)1 0.119608 0.598042 4.08916 4.08916 1 52 0.119608 1.196084 4.08916 8.17832 4 53 0.119608 1.794126 4.08916 12.26748 9 54 0.054771 2.067982 6.042807 18.31029 16 55 0.054771 2.341839 6.042807 24.35309 25 56 0.054771 2.615695 6.042807 30.3959 36 3 6.0428077 0.382124 4.526317 2.287771 32.68367 49 3 8.3305798 0.382124 6.436939 2.287771 34.97144 64 3 10.618359 0.382124 8.34756 2.287771 37.25922 81 2 12.90612
10 0.946519 13.08016 1.453618 38.71283 100 2 14.3597411 0.946519 17.81275 1.453618 40.16645 121 1 15.8133612 0.946519 22.54535 1.453618 41.62007 144 1 17.2669813 0.975312 27.42191 1.432 43.05207 169 1 18.6989814 0.975312 32.29847 1.432 44.48407 196 1 20.1309815 0.975312 37.17503 1.432 45.91607 225 2 21.5629816 0.753098 40.94052 1.629631 47.5457 256 2 23.1926117 0.753098 44.70601 1.629631 49.17533 289 2 24.8222418 0.753098 48.47149 1.629631 50.80497 324 2 26.4518719 0.727394 52.10846 1.658174 52.46314 361 2 28.11005
1010
Models for Variable Demand
• Correct Models– Relate decision whether or not to ship with
volume shipped– Q[t] Ship[t]*Remaining Demand
• Better Models– Do not aggregate constraints– Q[s, t] Ship[s]*Demand in Period t
1111
Location
• Different Objectives– Item-miles– miles– max distance– …
• Two varieties of models– Do we locate here or not?– What is the position of the facility?
1212
Location
• Measures of Distance– Rectilinear– Euclidean
• Iterative scheme for locating a single facility using Euclidean Distances
• Extension to locating several facilities– Locate– Allocate