logistics chellanges in india august 14
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Logistics Chellanges in India August 14](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020812/563dbb7b550346aa9aad8b2e/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
7/21/2019 Logistics Chellanges in India August 14
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/logistics-chellanges-in-india-august-14 1/5
International Journal of Management, MIT College of Management, Vol. 2, No. 2, August 2014, pp. 58–62 58
ISSN 2321- 6700 © MIT Publications
Logistics : Challenges, Look-ins in India
Pranav Kharbanda1
INTRODUCTIONThe Indian economy has been growing at an average rate of more
than 8 per cent over the last four years (Srinivas, 2006) putting
enormous demands on its productive infrastructure. Whether it is
the physical infrastructure of road, ports, water, power etc. or thedigital infrastructure of broadband networks, telecommunication
etc. or the service infrastructure of logistics — all are being
stretched to perform beyond their capabilities. Interestingly,
this is leading to an emergence of innovative practices to allow
business and public service to operate at a higher growth rate in
an environment where the support systems are getting augmented
concurrently. In this paper, the status of the evolving logistics
sector in India has been presented, innovations therein through
interesting business models and the challenges that it faces in
years to come.
THE CURRENT SCENARIO OF LOGISTICINFRASTRUCTURE IN INDIA
Globally, the logistics industry is valued at US$ 3.5 trillion and
the Indian logistics industry is presently estimated at US$ 90
billion (Source: CII).The global logistics industry was valued
at US$3.5 trillion in 2007, whereas US logistics industry size
was around US$900 billion, 25% of the global logistics industry.
Logistics costs in India are estimated to be around 13% of
the GDP, which comes to around US$94 billion in 2006-07.
However, India’s spending on logistics industry is much higher
than the developed economies like the US (9.5%) and Japan
(10.5%). Presently, Indian logistics industry is highly fragmented
and is still evolving, with the top 100 listed players only having
a miniscule 2 per cent market share.
Only India among the BRIC nations has slipped on the WorldBank’s Logistics Performance Index. India’s ranking slipped to
46th in the 2012 World Bank’s Logistics Performance Index,
which measures logistics efciency and is now recognized
globally. Five years ago, India was ranked 39. The drop in ranking
is a matter of concern for the country, which is expecting a lot
of foreign investment across sectors that require an efcient
logistics system.
The Indian logistics market, valued at $14 billion a couple
of years ago, is expected to grow at a CAGR (compounded
annual growth rate) of 7-8 per cent. It is felt that the growth will
continue, and might even scale newer heights, as the economyis experiencing a retail boom with Western companies such as
Metro, Wal-Mart planning to start operation in this country, and
large local retailers such as Shoppers Stop, Pantaloon, RPG and
Big Bazaar planning to expand their operations in smaller cities.
India has one of the world’s largest road networks, with a total
length of 3.3 million kilometers. But much of this network
does not meet Western standards. The Indian road transport
market is forecast to rise to $40 billion by 2012 — it is
currently $28 billion.
The logistics industry in India is evolving rapidly and it is the interplay of infrastructure, technology and new types of service
providers that will dene whether the industry is able to help its customers reduce their logistics costs and provide effective
services (which are also growing). Changing government policies on taxation and regulation of service providers are going
to play an important role in this process. Coordination across various government agencies requires approval from multiple
ministries and is a road block for multi modal transport in India. At the rm level, the logistics focus is moving towards reducing
cycle times in order to add value to their customers. Consequently, better tools and strategies are being sought by rms in order
to enhance their decision making. The present study emphasizes upon a perspective on these issues, outline some of the key
challenges with the help of secondary information, and describe some interesting initiatives that some rms and industries are
taking to compete through excellence in managing their logistics. The research focuses on the importance of logistics capability
and its effect on rm’s performance in the e-commerce market. Logistics capability is perceived as the rm’s critical capability
in providing a competitive advantage in both traditional and e-commerce market environments.
Keywords : Logistics management, e-commerce market, multi model transport.
ABSTRACT
1. CPEM IIFT, Assistant Professor, Knowledge Institute, Delhi, F-296, 1st Floor, Mansarover Garden, New Delhi-110015 (INDIA).
![Page 2: Logistics Chellanges in India August 14](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020812/563dbb7b550346aa9aad8b2e/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
7/21/2019 Logistics Chellanges in India August 14
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/logistics-chellanges-in-india-august-14 2/5
International Journal of Management, MIT College of Management, Vol. 2, No. 2, August 2014, pp. 58–62 59
ISSN 2321- 6700 © MIT Publications
PROBLEMS/CHALLENGES IN LOGISTICS
MANAGEMENT IN INDIA
Logistics has always been a central and essential feature of
all economic activity. Despite this importance, there is a long
history of organizations paying little attention to their logistics.
They traditionally concentrated their efforts into manufacturing
products and considered the movement and storage of materials
as an uninteresting errand that formed part of the overheads of
doing business.
Recession in many markets, combined with new sources of
competition, has raised the consciousness of customers towards
value of service delivered to them by their service providers.
Accordingly, the logistics industry has consciously strived to
be at the focal point of strategy formulation and operational
excellence to continue in its endeavor for providing maximum
contribution in value creation. Globalization, consolidation,
technology advancements and outsourcing have led to growth in
the logistics services market. The capabilities of logistics service providers are growing along with the changing expectations
of their clients. As the logistics services industry evolves,
competitors are moving away from asset-based commoditized
services to more strategic, information-based approaches. Some
of the challenges faced by Indian rms in logistics sector are:
• Lack of sustained investment in planned infrastructure
like warehouses, transport centers, ICDs etc.
• Cold Chain infrastructure is very sporadic. The concept
of “Integrated Cold Chain” is non-existent.
• Major investments on these infrastructures have come from
Government agencies like CWC, SWC, CONCOR etc. • Current private sector initiatives are small and sporadic.
• Private sector warehousing are of poor quality, small,
fragmented and does not meet infrastructure standards.
• No quality standards or benchmarks are followed in in-
frastructure creation.
KEY COUNCIL INSIGHTS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS
While a lack of Logistics infrastructure is a burden, it’s also
an opportunity. Starting fresh means adopting the best supply
chain management principles, practices and technologies without
having to migrate or upgrade legacy approaches. Manufacturers
and retailers should devise a strategy to align with the organized-
retailing infrastructure build-out, focusing key activities on
designing a multi-tiered distribution network, setting basic
transportation goals and expectations, and establishing solid
partnerships.
Design a Multi-tiered Distribution Network
The key to a successful distribution strategy will be proximity.
The tail that wags the distribution dog is transportation reliability.
Transportation reliability or, more accurately, unreliability, will
play a key role in determining the number of nodes required for
distribution and the inventory to support it. Pure ow-through,
or single-node distribution chains from plants directly to
retailers, will be non-existent. CPG and retail rms will require
signicantly more infrastructure in India. For example, Reliance
plans to build between 65 and 80 distribution centers to support
its goal of $20 billion in revenue. That’s more than half the
DCs currently in Wal-Mart’s supply chain, which supports over10 times the revenue. Even as Reliance and Wal-Mart build
distribution capability, manufacturers will have to match this
distribution, not only at the local level, but also at regional and
central points. These multi-echelon networks will replace lean,
single-tiered U.S. philosophies based on just-in-time principles.
Even rms with fast-moving goods will be required to set up
decentralized, multi-tiered distribution networks.
Rely More Heavily on Inventory
Let’s face it, in the near term, India’s supply chains will not be
highly reliable. Shippers accustomed to reliability and speedwill have to reset expectations. To reduce the impact of highly-
variable transportation, brought about by inadequate logistical
infrastructure, rms must adopt inventory strategies similar to
those used in small-part service industries. While service parts
industries use inventory to buffer demand versus transportation
variability, the resulting network structure is the same. Firms will
need to stage inventory throughout multiple echelons to reduce
the impact of transportation variability and high transportation
costs. This multi-echelon staging will create networks with
many distribution points and double-handling of products. By
investing in additional capacity ow, like dock-doors and staging
oor space, rms will add more capacity for quick off-loading,reducing the impact of increased transportation investments and
costs. The ‘cringe factor’ of this strategy is reduced, considering
labor and warehousing combine for less than a quarter of India’s
logistics costs.
Reside Close to the Market
To buffer lead-time variability, firms should set up final
distribution within the independent, local markets they plan to
serve. By starting in only a few highly-concentrated cities, a
regionalized distribution scheme will enable rms to support
branded stores or dis tribution operat ions, while bui lding
relationships with other local entities to expand their presence.
As volume grows and transportation improves, rms can convert
regional stocking facilities to ow-through and add centralized
facilities as sourcing and stocking points. However, to support
this more efcient multi-tiered strategy, rms will need to vie
for space now, as land grab efforts increase dramatically. Just
last year, retail real estate costs accelerated faster in New Delhi
than anywhere else in the world. While hot urban areas include
Hyderabad, Bangalore and Mumbai, second-tier cities are quickly
becoming targets of mall openings, accounting for 40 percent
of those scheduled through 2010. Longer term, about 200 cities
with under 2 million in population and 500 additional rural townswill be used as retail hubs, each catering to over 1000 villages.
![Page 3: Logistics Chellanges in India August 14](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020812/563dbb7b550346aa9aad8b2e/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
7/21/2019 Logistics Chellanges in India August 14
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/logistics-chellanges-in-india-august-14 3/5
International Journal of Management, MIT College of Management, Vol. 2, No. 2, August 2014, pp. 58–62 60
ISSN 2321- 6700 © MIT Publications
Use Technology to Provide Visibility and Collaboration
To manage the inevitable explosion in items they will eventually
carry, organized retailers are investing heavily in leading-edge
systems to create a data foundation for providing visibility and
optimizing operations. Early-stage retail ventures are starting
with leading-edge planning and execution applications fromSAP, Oracle, JDA, Manhattan Associates and i2 Technologies.
These systems will greatly aid supplier collaboration and enable
manufacturers to share in real-time information ow. They
also will make it possible for retailers to build accurate sales
histories from day one, creating a foundation for more robust
planning capabilities in network design, inventory planning and
transportation modeling.
Select a key partner. Today, third-party logistics in India accounts
for a quarter of its transport industry, but is expected to grow
to over $125 billion by 2010. Including distribution, the 3PL
market is expected to hit $3.6 billion by 2012. This growth is
being fueled, in part, by large investments in automotive andtelecom manufacturing. 3PLs like Menlo are not only managing
distribution, but many are also offering innovative assembly and
manufacturing manpower, as well. And industrial real-estate
developers Prologis and Aeroterm are entering the market by
building on speculation. The partial introduction of the Value
Added Tax (VAT) in 2005 is expected to drive more industries
toward using 3PL services, since it benets large warehouses in
hub cities — huge investments many companies will want the
service providers to make.
Set Basic Transportation Goals and Expectations
In India, the transportation network consists of few highways,small trucks and constrained speeds. It is projected that highways
will improve, as recently funded projects are completed. The
government has pledged to build 10,000 kilometers of new roads
and improve ports by 2010. But the bulk of the infrastructure will
likely come from private or foreign investment. For example,
Mukesh Ambani, Reliance’s chairman, is building a new port
city near Mumbai. His younger brother, Anil, is building a $4
billion suburban railway system in Mumbai. Several of India’s
other wealthiest business developers are focused on developing
energy for the country. As infrastructure improves, new market
entrants will need transportation strategies that:
Focus on high asset utilization. While labor in India isinexpensive, compared to developed economies in the West,
equipment and fuel are not. Comparatively, labor is the highest
cost component in the U.S., but in India, it’s one-third the cost
per kilometer of fuel alone (Exhibit 4 shows a logistical cost
comparison between India and U.S.). Leveraging low-cost labor
to maximize the utilization of assets will be a critical element
to optimizing transportation strategies. By employing strategies
such as “slip-seating,” one driver can be changed-over with
another driver when his maximum driving time is reached, since
there’s minimal nancial impact to rest him for the day. Firms can
utilize team-driving to improve not only equipment utilization,
but also improve transit times and reduce variability.
Establish a Core, Senior Logistics Team on the Ground
Delivery success in the near term won’t be based on technology,
but rather on relationships and communication. Firms won’t
be able to manage transportation virtually from an ofce in
Chicago or Amsterdam. Instead, they will have to build a strong
physical presence in each region. Companies like Samsung havesuccessfully penetrated India by employing a core, experienced
operations team in each region. This team must be familiar
with the regional service providers, restrictions and statewide
regulations.
Set rigid provider qualications. India’s carrier base will continue
to consolidate and become more sophisticated as the shippers
they serve invest and demand higher service. In 2004, DHL
acquired Blue Dart to cover 13,000 locations in India. TNT
and Fed Ex are aggressively entering the market and both have
proven success rates creating global networks. In the meantime,
companies need to put in place a set of rigid qualications to set
expectations for intermediaries and independent carriers. Firmsneed to rigorously qualify and measure carrier performance and
communicate that data back to carriers.
Establish infrastructure others can use. Firms should consider
infrastructure investments as potential future prot centers.
Manufacturers will have an opportunity to not only build
infrastructure for themselves, but to create distribution and
transportation services that others can use. For example,
Mahindra & Mahindra, an automotive company, established
a business to manage its complex logistics processes. To take
advantage of this investment, they became a 3 PL to others in
need of logistics and distribution. Manufacturers can set up
local distribution where plants are located and retailers can build infrastructure to support other non-competing retailers. To
mitigate concerns about carrier reliability, rms can benet by
setting up dedicated eets. To better utilize these assets, brokers
and intermediaries can be leveraged to ll backhauls.
Invest Early in Technology
India’s telecom industry is extremely advanced compared to other
industries. And while only 30,000 vehicles in the country have
tracking capability, that’s expected to grow a total of 100 percent
over the next ve years. Already, telecom and software rms are
scrambling for a slice of the 1.6 million-vehicles-a-year market.
Firms investing in this technology for their dedicated eets willnd the infrastructure to support them substantial.
Focus on Establishing Solid Partnerships
Foreign rms that have been successful in India have done so
with the right local support. Local relationships are the true key
to success in India. Local companies can use their inuence to
make or break an initiative. To truly make an endeavor successful,
rms should search for growing business groups with which to
develop sustainable partnerships. To name a few examples, Tata
Group is a diversied company known as a visionary in Indian
business, and Bharti has proven it works well with multi-national
partners. Firms need to look outside of traditional partnerships
![Page 4: Logistics Chellanges in India August 14](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020812/563dbb7b550346aa9aad8b2e/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
7/21/2019 Logistics Chellanges in India August 14
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/logistics-chellanges-in-india-august-14 4/5
International Journal of Management, MIT College of Management, Vol. 2, No. 2, August 2014, pp. 58–62 61
ISSN 2321- 6700 © MIT Publications
to companies in other industries like Telecom. Even with
limited supply chain experience, these potential partners possess
nationwide connections and have proven success in growing
businesses in this market. And while the big three Indian families
control 30 percent of the country’s GDP, partnering with them
can be challenging, since power and decision-making is connedto a few key players. To avoid failure, companies should look
for rms with a proven track record of sustained partnerships.
CONCLUSION
The logistics industry will continue to be the focal point of strategy
formulation, operational excellence and information technology
to make maximum contribution in value creation for customers.
Globalization, consolidation, technology advancements and
outsourcing have only led to growth in the logistics services
market and this industry will continue to evolve in the coming
years. Industry research suggests that the interdependent factors
like globalization and consolidation, increased outsourcing,
security and risk management, technological advancements,
increased customer expectations etc. will shape the Global
Logistics Industry over the next 5-10 years.
Drivers like these and the push/pull pressures created by the
market forces will not only trigger structural changes in the
logistics industry resulting in specialization, consolidation,
outsourcing, service migration, new markets, new services but
will also create challenges around service, delivery, quality and
cost as customer needs become more demanding and complex.
SMEs, forming the core of the logistics industry, will be impacted
by this transition in a major way and will have to focus on
improvement of its internal operations, processes, technology
upgradation, resource utilization, service quality, customerrelationships, market intelligence, and nancial strengthening,
in a nutshell in overall capability enhancement — in order to
respond to and gain from the changing environment.
The government is indeed trying to introduce counter-measures
and shift freight transports from the roads to the rails. But, rst,
the rail infrastructure must be expanded and the connections
to harbors and airports improved. The government should also
induce some of the better-performing PSUs, particularly those
engaged in infrastructure, such as power, transport, construction,
etc., to expand and speed up their investment programmes.
Finding resources for infrastructure development and speeding
up investment in this sector should receive top priority, for, asthe World Bank has observed, infrastructure is a key factor in
improving the lifestyles of the masses and addressing the pressing
issue of poverty.
REFERENCES
Daudin, G., Rifart, C. and Schweisguth, D. Who produces for whom
in the world economy? In Canadian Journal of Economics, 2011,
44(4):1403-37.
Freund, C. and Rocha, N., What Constrains Africa’s Exports? In World
Bank Economic Review, 2011, 25(3): 361-86.
Gawande, K., Hoekman, B. and Cui, Y. 2011. Determinants of Trade
Policy Responses to the 2008 Financial Crisis. In World Bank Policy Research Working Paper, 2011: 5862.
World Bank. 2012. Connecting to Compete, 2012: Trade Logistics
in the Global Economy. Washington DC: World Bank. (www.
worldbank.org/lpi)
Bernard Hoekman Director, International Trade Department, World
Bank, Washington DC.
Aktas, A. and Ulengin, F., 2005. Outsourcing logistics activities inTurkey. Journal of Enterprise Information Management , 18 (3),
316-329.
Arroyo, P., Gaytan, J. and de Boer, L., 2006. A survey of third-party
logistics in Mexico and a comparison with reports on Europe
and USA. International Journal of Operations and Production
Management , 26 (6), 639-667.
Bagchi, P. and Mitra, S., 2006. Key success factors, performance metrics
and globalization issues in the third-party logistics (3PL) industry:
a survey of North American Service Providers. Working Paper #
595, Indian Institute of Management Calcutta, India.
Bhatnagar, R., Sohal, A.S. and Millen, R., 1999. Third Party Logistics
Services: A Singapore Perspective. International Journal of
Physical Distribution and Logistics Management , 29 (9), 569-587.
Bot, B.L. and Neumann, C.S., 2003. Growing Pains for Logistics
Outsourcers. The McKinsey Quarterly, 2, 68-77.
Bowman, R.J., 2006. Globalization, new customer demands drive
logistics outsourcing to the next level [online]. Global Logistics
and Supply Chain Strategies. Available from: http://www.glscs.
com/archives/06.06.logistics.htm?adcode=90.
Carbone, V. and Stone, M.A., 2005. Growth and relational strategies
used by the European logistics service providers: rationale
and outcomes. Transportation Research, Part E, Logistics and
Transportation Review, 41E (6), 495-510.
Cilliers, W.W. and Nagel, P.A.J., 1994. Logistics trends in South Africa.
International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management , 24 (7), 4-14.
Dapiran, P., Lieb, R., Millen, R. and Sohal, A., 1996. Third party logistics
services usage by large Australian rms. International Journal of
Physical Distribution and Logistics Management , 26 (10), 36-45.
Evans, R. and Danks, A., 1998. Strategic Supply Chain Management:
Creating shareholder value by aligning supplying chain strategy
with business strategy. In: Gattorna, J. (ed.), Strategic Supply Chain
Alignment , Gower, 18-37.
Foster, T.A. and Armstrong, R., 2004. Top 25 third-party logistics
providers extend their global reach [online]. Global Logistics and
Supply Chain Strategies. Available from: http://www.glscs.com/
archives/05.04.25_3pls.htm?adcode=90.
Foster, T.A. and Armstrong, R., 2005. Top 25 third-party logistics
providers: bigger and broader [online]. Global Logistics and
Supply Chain Strategies. Available from: http://www.glscs.com/
archives/05.05.25_3pls.htm?adcode=90.
Foster, T.A. and Armstrong, R., 2006. The top 25 global 3PLs: Is
bigger really better? [online]. Global Logistics and Supply
Chain Strategies. Available from: http://www.glscs.com/
archives/05.06.25_3pls.htm?adcode=90.
Kim, Jae-II., 1996. Logistics in Korea: current state and future directions.
International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics
Management , 26 (10), 6-21.
Langley Jr., C.J., Hoemmken, S., van Dort, E., Morton, J., Strata, R.
and Riegler, M., 2007. The state of logistics outsourcing: 2007third-party logistics [online]. Available from: http://3plstudy.com.
![Page 5: Logistics Chellanges in India August 14](https://reader031.vdocuments.us/reader031/viewer/2022020812/563dbb7b550346aa9aad8b2e/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
7/21/2019 Logistics Chellanges in India August 14
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/logistics-chellanges-in-india-august-14 5/5
International Journal of Management, MIT College of Management, Vol. 2, No. 2, August 2014, pp. 58–62 62
ISSN 2321- 6700 © MIT Publications
Acharya, R.C. (2006a), “Railways Heavy Task,” Economic Times, 20
November.
Acharya, R.C. (2006b), “Concor: Miles Ahead on Multimodal Track,”
Economic Times, 18 December.
ACMA report (2005) “Indian Auto Industry — Status, Prospects and
Challenges,” Retrieved February, 2005 from www.acmainfo.com.
Ahya, C. (2006), “The Retail Supply Chain Revolution,” Economic
Times, 7 December.
Baxi, S. (2006), “It’s a Capital Idea,” Economic Times, 20 December.
Bhatt, N. (2006), “Concor: Sailing Through”, Business Standard ,
8 September.
Business Standard (2006), “SPV for Rs. 523 cr Orissa rail link soon,”
Business Standard , 24 October 2006.
Chandra, P. (2003), “Coordinating the Dabbawallah Supply Chain,”
Mimeo, Indian Institute of Management , Ahmedabad.
Chandra, P. and T. Sastry (2004), “Competitiveness of Indian
Manufacturing:Findings of the 2001 National Manufacturing
Survey,” Forthcoming in Technology, Operations and Management.
Chandra, P. and D. Tirpuati (2003), Managing Complex Networks in
Emerging Markets: The Story of AMUL, WP 2002-5-1. Indian
Institute of Management , Ahmedabad.
Deccan Herald (2006), “Inter-Port Connectivity Needed,” Deccan
Herald , 18 November 2006.
Dobberstein, N., C-S Neumann, and M. Zils (2005), “Logistics in
Emerging Markets,” McKinsey Quarterly, 1, 15-17.
Financial Express (2006a), “Freight Rates to Go Up 5-6%, Financial
Express, Mumbai, 6 June 2006.”
Financial Express (2006b), “Smooth Sailing For Coastal Shipping As
Centre Mulls Special Scheme,” Financial Express, 17 January 2006.
Financial Express (2006c), “Chinese Consortium to Partner Kerala In
Vizhinjam Port”, Financial Express, Mumbai, 19 January 2006.
Gill, P.N.S. (2006), “Ludhiana Expecting Freight Corridor Boast,”
Business Standard , 19 September.
Guha, R. and P Sinha. (2006), “Two-Way Sign: Rly Ministry Plans
Road-Rail Cargo System”, Economic Times, 15 July.
IAEIS, Industry Analysis & Economic Intelligence Service Database
Mahalakshmi, B.V. (2006), “M &As Boost Logistics Industry,”
Financial Express, 9 December.
Mishra, A.K., R Pratap, and S. Baxi (2006), “Climb to Top in Logistics
Ladder,” Economic Times.
Mitra, M. (2004), “Distribution’s Disruptive Duo,” Business Today,
Mumbai, 18 January, pp. 86-88.
Mukul, J. (2007), “Ports Told to Get Their Act Right,” Daily News &
Analysis, 4 January.
Prowess (2006), Prowess Database, Centre for Monitoring of Indian
Economy, Mumbai.
Raja, S.T.E. (2006), “Private Sector Likely To Invest $7.7 billion In
Ports,” Hindu Business Line, 23 Nov.
Rastogi, A. (2006), “India Infrastructure Report 2006,” Oxford
University Press, 9-12.
Raghuram, G. and J. Shah (2003), “ Roadmap for Logistics Excellence:
Need to Break the Reddy, Ch. Prashanth (2007), “Gati Eyes Retail
Market,” Business Standard , Ahmedabad, 29 January.
Sanjai, P.R. (2007) NHAI pens Rs. 3000 crore solutions plan,” Business
Standard, Ahmedabad, 29 Sanjeevi, V. (2003), “Logistics in a
competitive milieu,” The Hindu, 23 December.
Sanyal, S. (2006a), “A Guide to Global Logistics and Freight
Forwarding,” Hindu Business Line. 11 December.
Sanyal, S. (2006b), “Freight Hike Will not be Uniform on All Routes,”
Hindu Business Line. 8 June.