logic

28
Logic basic concepts and methods George W. Matthews Pennsylvania College of Technology Fall 2015

Upload: george-matthews

Post on 03-Aug-2015

23 views

Category:

Education


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Logicbasic concepts and methods

George W. Matthews

Pennsylvania College of Technology

Fall 2015

What is an argument?

Any series of statements in which one (theconclusion) is meant to follow from or besupported by, the others (the premises).

An attempt to show that one statement is true onthe basis of other statements.

A presentation of the evidence for a claim.

Not a verbal fight that has two (or more) sides.

Statements

Sentences that say something about something.

Statements are either true or false.

examples

“The cat ate my homework.”

“Xena is the tenth planet.”

“It is never acceptable to killanother human being.”

Statements are distinguished from other kinds ofsentences like questions, commands, exclamationswhich are neither true nor false.

Premise Indicators

Premises are given information that we are askedto accept as a basis for argument.

Premise indicators tell us which claims theargument starts from.

examples

Since . . .

Because of . . .

Assume for the sake ofargument that . . .

We all know that . . .

Conclusion Indicators

Conclusions are the points being established by theargument.

Conclusion indicators tell us where the argument isgoing.

examples

Therefore . . .

Thus . . .

So we can see that . . .

It follows that . . .

Identify Premises and Conclusion

We know for a fact that my client was not atthe scene of the crime. Furthermore, the chiefprosecution witness is a known perjurer. Thusmy client is not guilty.

in standard form

My client was not at the scene of the crime.The chief prosecution witness is a knownperjurer.

My client is not guilty.

Identify Premises and Conclusion

We know for a fact that my client was not atthe scene of the crime. Furthermore, the chiefprosecution witness is a known perjurer. Thusmy client is not guilty.

in standard form

My client was not at the scene of the crime.The chief prosecution witness is a knownperjurer.

My client is not guilty.

Identify Premises and Conclusion

Christopher Columbus was a criminal. This isbecause whoever steals land or gold, enslavespeople or kills innocent people is a criminal andhe did all of the these things.

in standard form

Whoever steals land or gold, enslaves people orkills innocent people is a criminal.Christopher Columbus did all of the thesethings.

Christopher Columbus was a criminal.

Identify Premises and Conclusion

Christopher Columbus was a criminal. This isbecause whoever steals land or gold, enslavespeople or kills innocent people is a criminal andhe did all of the these things.

in standard form

Whoever steals land or gold, enslaves people orkills innocent people is a criminal.Christopher Columbus did all of the thesethings.

Christopher Columbus was a criminal.

What makes a good argument?

The best, most persuasive arguments are bothvalid and sound.

definition: In a valid argument, if thepremises are true, the conclusion must be true.

definition: A sound argument is a validargument with premises that are really true.

Valid or invalid?

All human beings are mortal.Socrates is a human being.Whoever is going to die worries about dyingoccasionally.

Socrates worries about dying occasionally.

This argument is in standard form.

If the premises are true must the conclusion alsobe true?

YES, this argument is VALID.

Valid or invalid?

All human beings are mortal.Socrates is a human being.Whoever is going to die worries about dyingoccasionally.

Socrates worries about dying occasionally.

This argument is in standard form.

If the premises are true must the conclusion alsobe true?

YES, this argument is VALID.

Valid or invalid?

All human beings are animals.Plato is an animal.

Plato is a human being.

If the premises are true must the conclusion alsobe true?

NO, this argument is INVALID.

Valid or invalid?

All human beings are animals.Plato is an animal.

Plato is a human being.

If the premises are true must the conclusion alsobe true?

NO, this argument is INVALID.

Valid or invalid?

If abortion is wrong it should be illegal.Abortion is wrong.

Abortion should be illegal.

Can the premises both be true and the conclusionbe false?

No. The only way for the conclusion to be false isif at least one of the premises were false, so thisargument is VALID.

But is it sound?

Valid or invalid?

If abortion is wrong it should be illegal.Abortion is wrong.

Abortion should be illegal.

Can the premises both be true and the conclusionbe false?

No. The only way for the conclusion to be false isif at least one of the premises were false, so thisargument is VALID.

But is it sound?

Valid or invalid?

If abortion is wrong it should be illegal.Abortion is wrong.

Abortion should be illegal.

Can the premises both be true and the conclusionbe false?

No. The only way for the conclusion to be false isif at least one of the premises were false, so thisargument is VALID.

But is it sound?

Sound or unsound?

Poor people do not have much money.It costs a lot of money to buy first class airlinetickets.

So poor people do not fly first class except inunusual circumstances.

This argument is VALID.

To check if it is sound we need to know if thepremises are really true.

The first premise is true by definition and thesecond is true in fact.

Thus this argument is SOUND, the conclusion isreally true.

Sound or unsound?

Poor people do not have much money.It costs a lot of money to buy first class airlinetickets.

So poor people do not fly first class except inunusual circumstances.

This argument is VALID.

To check if it is sound we need to know if thepremises are really true.

The first premise is true by definition and thesecond is true in fact.

Thus this argument is SOUND, the conclusion isreally true.

Sound or unsound?

Poor people do not have much money.It costs a lot of money to buy first class airlinetickets.

So poor people do not fly first class except inunusual circumstances.

This argument is VALID.

To check if it is sound we need to know if thepremises are really true.

The first premise is true by definition and thesecond is true in fact.

Thus this argument is SOUND, the conclusion isreally true.

Sound or unsound?

Poor people do not have much money.If you do not have something, you must notwant it.

So poor people are poor of their own free will,because they want to be poor.

Are both premises of this argument true?

The first premise is true by definition.

The second premise is false – so this argument isUNSOUND, even though it is VALID.

Sound or unsound?

If abortion is wrong it should be illegal.Abortion is wrong.

Abortion should be illegal.

This is a valid argument, but are the premisesreally true?

The second premise needs more argument to backit up since it is not obviously true.

The first premise is false.

This argument is UNSOUND.

Summary: analyzing arguments

identifyargument

invalid

DISCARD – conclusion does not follow

valid

unsound

DISCARD – premises false

sound

ACCEPT – conclusion is true

Summary: analyzing arguments

identifyargument

invalid

DISCARD – conclusion does not follow

valid

unsound

DISCARD – premises false

sound

ACCEPT – conclusion is true

Summary: analyzing arguments

identifyargument

invalid

DISCARD – conclusion does not follow

valid

unsound

DISCARD – premises false

sound

ACCEPT – conclusion is true

Summary: analyzing arguments

identifyargument

invalid

DISCARD – conclusion does not follow

valid

unsound

DISCARD – premises false

sound

ACCEPT – conclusion is true

Summary: analyzing arguments

identifyargument

invalid

DISCARD – conclusion does not follow

valid

unsound

DISCARD – premises false

sound

ACCEPT – conclusion is true

Summary: analyzing arguments

identifyargument

invalid

DISCARD – conclusion does not follow

valid

unsound

DISCARD – premises false

sound

ACCEPT – conclusion is true