local single sky implementation (lssip) ukraine (formally ... · ity-fmtp apply a common flight...

Years 2013-2017 – Level 1

(Formally known as LCIP)

Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) UKRAINE

EUROCONTROL

LSSIP 2013-2017 Ukraine ii Released Issue

DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION SHEET

Local Single Sky ImPlementation document for UKRAINE

Infocentre Reference: 13/01/02-41

Document Identifier Edition: Year 2013

LSSIP Year 2013 Ukraine Edition Date: 19.04.2013

LSSIP Focal Point - Ruslan HUTSAN E-mail: [email protected]

UkSATSE

LSSIP Contact Person – Ana Paula FRANGOLHO

E-mail: [email protected]

Unit DSS/EIPR

Status Intended for

Working Draft General Public

Draft Agency Stakeholders

Proposed Issue Restricted Audience

Released Issue

Accessible via: Internet (www.eurocontrol.int)

Path:

LINKS TO REFERENCE DOCUMENTS

1. LSSIP Guidance Material: http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/guidance-material 2. ESSIP Plan Edition 2012: www.eurocontrol.int/eipr 3. ESSIP Report 2011: www.eurocontrol.int/eipr 4. STATFOR Forecasts: www.eurocontrol.int/statfor/public/standard_page/forecast_methodology.html 5. Acronyms and abbreviations: http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries 6. Single European Sky (SES): www.eurocontrol.int/sesreporting 7. European ATM Master Plan: www.eurocontrol.int/sesar/public/standard_page/masterplan.html 8. Previous LSSIP Documents: http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip 9. SAA of Ukraine: www.avia.gov.ua 10. UkSATSE: www.uksatse.aero 11. Boryspil airport: http://kbp.aero/

LSSIP 2013-2017 Ukraine iii Released Issue

APPROVAL SHEET

LSSIP 2013-2017 Ukraine iv Released Issue

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................. v Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. ix Chapter 1 - National Stakeholders........................................................................................................1-1

1.1 Civil Regulator(s) .................................................................................................................1-1 1.2 UkSATSE.............................................................................................................................1-3 1.3 Military Authorities ...............................................................................................................1-4 1.4 Airports.................................................................................................................................1-6 1.5 Accident/incident Investigation Body ...................................................................................1-6

Chapter 2 - Geographical Scope ..........................................................................................................2-1 2.1 International Membership ....................................................................................................2-1 2.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s)................................................................................2-1 2.3 ATC units of UkSATSE........................................................................................................2-2 2.4 Airspace Classification and Organisation ............................................................................2-5

Chapter 3 - National Projects................................................................................................................3-1 Chapter 4 - Regional Co-ordination and Projects .................................................................................4-1

4.1 Regional Co-ordination........................................................................................................4-1 4.2 International workshops.......................................................................................................4-1 4.3 Common Aviation Area Agreement .....................................................................................4-1 4.4 EU Twinning Project for Airports, Aerodromes and Air Navigation Service of Ukraine.......4-2 4.5 Regional cooperation...........................................................................................................4-2 4.6 MoC between DHMI and UkSATSE....................................................................................4-3 4.7 Project Management Plan for EUROCONTROL support....................................................4-3 4.8 EURO 2012 outcome...........................................................................................................4-4

Chapter 5 - ATM Safety ........................................................................................................................5-1 Chapter 6 - Airspace Organisation and Management ..........................................................................6-1 Chapter 7 - Air Traffic Control & Data Processing Systems .................................................................7-1 Chapter 8 - Traffic Flow and Capacity Management ............................................................................8-1 Chapter 9 - Aeronautical Information Management..............................................................................9-1 Chapter 10 - Human Resources Management and Human Factors ................................................. 10-1 Chapter 11 - CNS............................................................................................................................... 11-1

11.1 Communications ............................................................................................................... 11-1 11.2 Navigation......................................................................................................................... 11-3 11.3 Surveillance ...................................................................................................................... 11-4

Chapter 12 - Airport ATS.................................................................................................................... 12-1 12.1 Airport Kiev (Boryspil) ....................................................................................................... 12-1

Chapter 13 - Environment.................................................................................................................. 13-1 13.1 Airport Kiev (Boryspil) ....................................................................................................... 13-1

Chapter 14 - Cost-efficiency .............................................................................................................. 14-1 Chapter 15 - En-route Traffic and Capacity ....................................................................................... 15-1

15.1 Evolution of traffic in Ukraine............................................................................................ 15-1 15.2 DNIPROPETROVSK ACC................................................................................................ 15-2 15.3 KYIV ACC ........................................................................................................................ 15-4 15.4 LVIV ACC.......................................................................................................................... 15-7 15.5 ODESA ACC..................................................................................................................... 15-9 15.6 SIMFEROPOL ACC........................................................................................................ 15-11 15.7 Reference values of the breakdown of the European capacity/delay target .................. 15-13

Chapter 16 - Airport Traffic and Capacity .......................................................................................... 16-1 16.1 State Enterprise “Boryspil International Airport” (UKBB).................................................. 16-1

ANNEXES

LSSIP 2013-2017 Ukraine v Released Issue

Executive Summary

Part - State Context

The State Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU) was created in accordance with Decree of the President of

Ukraine № 398/2011 of 06.04.2011 - “Creation of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”.

A new Air Code of Ukraine was published and entered in force on 16 September 2011 (adopted on 19

May 2011 by the Parliament of Ukraine) - Law of Ukraine № 3393-VI.

The National Accident Investigation Bureau with civilian aircraft was established under Article 9 of the Air Code of Ukraine and of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine Regulation №228 dated 21 March 2012 and became operational from 01 Feb 2013.

In accordance with the statement of Ukraine on the 36th Session of EUROCONTROL Provisional Council, the RP1 should be considered as a transitional period for Ukraine, focusing on the monitoring of the Performance Indicators during RP1 with the intention of target setting in RP2.

The implementation of the ESARRs is progressing well, although not yet completed.

Complementary rules for ESARR 5 are still being drafted and foreseen to be ready in 2013.

On June 20, 2012 Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise (UkSATSE) and State Airports Administration of Turkey (DHMI) signed the Memorandum of cooperation, which envisages development of regional cooperation between UkSATSE and DHMI in the air navigation domain in the South-Eastern part of Europe.

On 11 Jan 2013 the meeting of the CAA representatives from Azerbaijan, Georgia, Turkey, Moldova and Ukraine agreed to increase the cooperation and to establish the Black Sea-Caspian rotation Group to be represented at the ICAO Council.

A numbers of national projects are planned and regional international activities are in place (see Chapter 3 and 4).

EUROCONTROL provided official deliverables of the Project Management Plan in the context of the

“Agreement for EUROCONTROL support to the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine” (see Chapter 4).

Part - ESSIP Objective Implementation

The objective “HUM02.1 - Integrate Human Factors into ATM Operations” became compulsory for Ukraine in 2011 (the applicability area of this objective was changed in October 2011). Implementation of this objective for UkSATSE will take 3 years instead of 4 years, as foreseen in the ESSIP Plan. Due to the change in applicability area and therefore a late start in the implementation, it was agreed with Agency that the status of implementation of this Objective for UkSATSE will be “Planned” instead of “Late in order to keep a fair implementation timing and transparent approach for all stakeholders.

LSSIP 2012 - Ukraine Implementation Completion dates

Active ESSIP Objectives Ch

2006

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

AOM - Airspace Organisation and Management

AOM20 Implement ATS Route Network (ARN) - Version 7 6

AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management 6

AOM13.1 Harmonize Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling

6

AOP - Airport ATS

AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1

UKBB-Kiev 12

LSSIP 2013-2017 Ukraine vi Released Issue



2006

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

AOP01.2 Implement airside capacity enhancement method and best practices based on Eurocontrol capacity and efficiency implementation manual

UKBB-Kiev 12

AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions 12

AOP08 Implement Airport Airside Capacity Planning Method

UKBB-Kiev 12

AOP09 Implement Optimised Dependent Parallel Operations

UKBB-Kiev 12

AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM)

UKBB-Kiev 12

AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2

UKBB-Kiev 12

ATC - Air Traffic Control

ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2

7

ATC07.1 Implement arrival management tools 7

ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 7

ATC02.5 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2

7

ATC02.6 Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2

7

ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2

7

ATC12 Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring

7

ATC15 Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations

7 ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller

during Coordination and Transfer 7

COM - Communications

COM09 Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP)

11.1

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 11.1

COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM 11.1

ENV - Environment

ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) techniques for environmental improvements

UKBB-Kiev 13

ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports

UKBB-Kiev 13

FCM - Flow and Capacity Management

FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services 8

FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning 8

GEN - General

GEN01 Implement European ANS contingency measures for Safety Critical Modes of Operation

5

LSSIP 2013-2017 Ukraine vii Released Issue



2006

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

2018

2019

2020

HUM - Human Factors

HUM01.1 Ensure timely availability of ATCOs 10

HUM02.1 Integrate Human Factors into ATM Operations 10

HUM03.1 Integrate Human Factors into the lifecycle of ATM systems 10

INF - Aeronautical Information Management

INF04 Implement integrated briefing 9

ITY - Interoperability

ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) 11.1

ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 11.1

ITY-COTR Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes

7

ITY-ADQ Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information

9

ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability 11.3

NAV - Navigation

NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV 11.2

NAV10 Implement APV procedures 11.2

SAF - Safety Management

SAF04 Implement measures to reduce the risk of level bust occurrences

5

SAF05 Implement measures to prevent air/ground communications induced safety occurrences.

5

SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements

5

SRC - Safety Regulation

SRC-AUDI

Implementation of Safety Regulatory Auditing by National Supervisory Authorities (NSA)

5 SRC-CHNG

Implementation of Safety Oversight of Changes to ATM by National Supervisory Authorities (NSA)

5

SRC-OVCA

Implementation of ATM Safety Oversight Capabilities by NSAs

5

SRC-RLMK

Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory Requirements (ESARRs)

5

SRC-SLRD

Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies 5

Understanding the Table

Objective Completed No Plan

Objective Partially Completed Missing Data

Objective Planned Not Applicable (Ukraine/Boryspil Airport does not participate in this obj.)

Late

NOTE: The year where the coloured box is placed indicates the ‘Implementation Completion Date’ as stated in the ESSIP for each objective. The colour-code indicates the Local progress with respect to this date. The Harmonisation Objectives are not reflected in this table.

LSSIP 2013-2017 Ukraine viii Released Issue

Part - Traffic and ATM Performance

Cost-efficiency

Ukraine’s actual real en-route unit cost deteriorated in 2011 (increase of +21.8% compared to 2010), i.e. significantly more than the increase forecasted in December 2011 (+1.6%). This increase in the 2011 unit cost is attributable to a substantial increase in en-route costs (by +30% in real terms or +40% in nominal terms), principally due to augmented cost of capital, accounting for some 38% of the en-route cost-base in 2011.

En-route Traffic and Capacity

Traffic in Ukraine increased by 4.1% during summer 2012 (May to October inclusive), when compared to summer 2011. The STATFOR medium-term forecast (MTF) predicts an average annual traffic growth between 4.2% and 6.7% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 5.3%.

In accordance with the statement of Ukraine on the 36th Session of EUROCONTROL Provisional Council the RP1 should be considered as a transitional period for Ukraine, focusing on the monitoring of the Performance Indicators during RP1 with the intention of target setting in RP2.

Airport Traffic and Capacity

State Enterprise International Airport “Boryspil” is the busiest Ukrainian airport and has on average of 275 movements per day (12 month 2011). At peak hour (12:00 – 15:00) does not exceed 45 movements per hour.

Maximum declared capacity is 92 flights/h. The new international terminal D building construction is finished and started operations in summer season 2012. It will increase the airport capacity up to 350-375 movements per day and 11550 passengers per hour.

LSSIP 2013-2017 Ukraine ix Released Issue

Introduction

The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the ESSIP/LSSIP mechanism, constitute a five-year plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the ESSIP and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. They also contain a report by the State on its level of compliance against the Single European Sky Regulations, where applicable. This LSSIP documents – Year 2012 describe the situation in the State at the end of December 2012.

The LSSIP documents are structured into three parts to better differentiate the Stakeholder(s) accountable for the information contained in each of them:

Part - State Context (Chapters 1 to 4), presents the key players in the State, and sets the institutional and geographical scenes to help the reader understand the specifics of the State and interpret the rest of the document correctly. It also presents a short description of the main national and regional projects in which the national Stakeholders are involved.

Part - ESSIP Objective Implementation (Chapters 5 to 13), contains high-level information on progress and plans of each ESSIP Objective, grouped per ESSIP domain. The information for each ESSIP Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section. Note: This Part is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of ESSIP Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the ESSIP.

Part - Traffic and ATM Performance (Chapters 14 to 16), contains information on the evolution of traffic (en-route and at main airport(s)), and the State’s five-year plans to improve its performance and achieve its targets in respect of Cost-Efficiency and en-route Capacity

.

LSSIP 2013-2017 Ukraine Realesed Issue

LSSIP 2013-2017

PART - STATE CONTEXT

LSSIP 2013-2017 Ukraine Chapter 1-1 Released Issue

Chapter 1 - National Stakeholders

The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Ukraine are the following: - Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine - Ministry of Defence of Ukraine - The Regulator, the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU); - The ATM Service Provider, UkSATSE.

Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the following diagram:

1.1 Civil Regulator(s)

The SAAU was created in accordance with Decree of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011 of 06.04.2011 - “Creation of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”. The SAAU is a separate and independent regulatory body. Activity of the SAAU is controlled and directed by the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine through the Minister of Infrastructure of Ukraine.

The SAAU is institutionally separated from the Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise (UkSATSE).

1.1.1 General information

The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below. The SAAU is further detailed in the following section.

Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible

Legal Basis

Rule-making MoI, SAAU “Air Code of Ukraine” - Law of Ukraine N3393-VI dated 19/05/2011 , Decrees of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011 dated 06.04.2011 “The Statute of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine” and N581/2011 dated 15/05/2011 "The Statute of Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine", Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine № 401 dated 29.03.2002


“Regulation on Utilisation of Airspace of Ukraine”

The aviation related regulatory acts are developed by the SAAU and approved at the level of MoI.

Safety Oversight SAAU Decree of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011 dated 06.04.2011 “The Statute of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”,

Order of MoTC "Regulation for the Safety Oversight in Air Traffic Management" № 320 dated 31/05/2010

Establishment of Tolerable Safety Levels

SAAU Order of MoTC "Regulation for the Safety Oversight in Air Traffic Management" № 320 dated 31/05/2010

Safety Performance Monitoring

SAAU "Regulation for the Safety Oversight in Air Traffic Management" dated 31/05/2010 № 320

Enforcement actions in case of non-compliance with safety regulatory requirements

SAAU “The Rules for Air Navigation Service Providers Certification’ approved by Order of the Ministry of Transport and Communications of Ukraine №42 dated 22/01/2007

Airspace SAAU “Air Code of Ukraine” - Law of Ukraine N3393-VI dated 19/05/2011, Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine № 401 dated 29.03.2002 “Regulation on Utilisation of Airspace of Ukraine”.

Economic MoI Decree of the President of Ukraine № 581/2011 dated 15/05/2011 "The Statute of Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine".

Environment SAAU Decree of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011 dated 06.04.2011 “The Statute of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”

Security SAAU Low of Ukraine N545-IV dated 20/02/2003 "The State Security Programme in areas of Civil Aviation",

Decree of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011 dated 06.04.2011 “The Statute of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine”

Although Single European Sky (SES) is not applicable to Ukraine (see also Chapter 2), ANSP certification is carried out in accordance with “The Rules for Air Navigation Service Providers Certification” approved by the order of the MoT № 42 dated 22/01/2007 (with amendments for requirements to ANSPs that provide MET services (order of MoI N575 dated on 28.11.2011) that was developed in line with the EC Regulation 1035/2011.

Website of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine (MoTC): http://www.mtu.gov.ua (in Ukrainian language).

Website of State Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU): www.avia.gov.ua (in Ukrainian, Russian languages).

Website of Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise of Ukraine (UkSATSE): http://www.uksatse.ua/ (in Ukrainian, Russian and English languages).

1.1.2 State Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU)

The Regulatory Body in the field of Civil Aviation in Ukraine is the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine (SAAU), established by the Decree of the President of Ukraine № 398/2011 dated 06.04.2011

It is a separate and independent regulatory body. It is institutionally separated from the ANSP.


The SAAU is composed of civil representatives only, but appropriate Military Authorities (MoD) are involved in the airspace planning process in accordance with the "Regulation on Utilisation of Airspace of Ukraine". The SAAU is responsible for the provision of effective functioning of the Integrated Civil-Military ATM System of Ukraine.

The structure of the SAAU and UkSATSE are shown in Annex B.

Annual Report published: The Annual Safety Report for 2011 was published in Feb 2012 (N 19.2.11-2a). The Safety Report for 9 months of 2012 was published on 20.10.201 19.2.11-11A The Annual Safety Report for 2012 was drafted and will be published not later than 20/02/2012.

1.2 UkSATSE

Name of the ANSP: Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise of Ukraine (UkSATSE)

Governance: State enterprise Ownership: Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine

Services provided Y/N Comment

ATC en-route Y See section 2.3. SAAU recertified UkSATSE as air navigation services provider on 27.12.2011 according to national legislation.

ATC approach Y See comment above.

ATC Airport(s) Y See comments above.

AIS Y SAAU recertified UkSATSE as air navigation services provider on 27.12.2011 according to national legislation.

AFIS Y See comments above.

CNS Y SAAU recertified UkSATSE as air navigation services provider on 27.12.2011 according to national legislation.

MET Y Certified by SAAU for en-route meteorological service. SAAU certified UkSATSE in June 2012 for en-route meteorological service. Meteorological service at airports is provided by the State Hydro - meteorological Service of Ministry of Emergency Situations.

ATCO training Y Training and Certification Centre of UkSATSE provides: initial training; unit training; continuation training (conversion training, training for unusual circumstances and emergencies, refresher training, language training); development training.

Others Y Flight Calibration Service.

Additional information:

Provision of services in other State(s):

Y 1. Part of the airspace of the Black Sea for which the provision of ATS is delegated to Ukraine according to international agreements. 2. In order to facilitate Approach Control Services for Uzhhorod Airport located close to the State Border, Air traffic services are delegated to Uzhhorod APP within part of airspace (Prohibited Area) of the Slovak Republic.


1.3 Military Authorities

The Military Authorities (the Ministry of Defence) in Ukraine are composed of:

- The General Staff; - The Armed Forces (Air Force, Ground Force and Naval).

The main responsibilities of the Air Force are:

- Air defence of airspace of Ukraine; - Monitoring of airspace usage; - Air Traffic Control within unclassified airspace (TSA, TRA, R, D-zone, CTR and TMA of

military aerodromes).

Air traffic control is ensured by a network of military ATC units which are responsible for providing OAT, planning and co-ordination with respective bodies of the Integrated Civil-Military ATM System of Ukraine. The military ATC units are a part of a common combat system of operation of the Armed Forces. Military ATC units situated at military airfields providing OAT services in a segregated unclassified airspace in accordance with specific rules and procedures. They report to the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine.

1.3.1 Regulatory role

Regulatory framework and rule-making

OAT GAT

OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?

Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?

N

Level of such legal provision: State Law, Ministerial Decree, Air Force Regulation

Level of such legal provision: N/A

Authority signing such legal provision: Prime Minister, Minister of Defence, Chief of Air Force

Authority signing such legal provision: N/A

These provisions cover: These provisions cover:

Rules of the Air for OAT Y

Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT N/A

OAT/GAT Coordination OAT/GAT Coordination N/A

ATCO Training Y ATCO Training N/A

ATCO Licensing Y ATCO Licensing N/A

ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification N/A

ANSP Supervision N ANSP Supervision N/A

Aircrew Training Y ESARR applicability N/A

Aircrew Licensing Y

Additional Information: OAT provided by Military ATC units

Additional Information: Military ATC units do not provide services to GAT

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:

National AIP Y National AIP N/A

National Military AIP Y National Military AIP N/A

EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N/A

Other: N Other: N/A


1.3.2 Oversight

1.3.3 Service Provision role

Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?

N/A If YES, since: N/A Duration of the Certificate:

N/A

Certificate issued by: N/A If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?

N/A

Additional Information:

1.3.4 User role

OAT GAT National oversight body for OAT: General Staff National Supervisory Authority (as per SES reg.

550/2004) for GAT services provided by the military: N/A

Additional information: Additional information: GAT is provided by respective ATS units (ACCs) of the Integrated Civil-Military ATM System.

OAT GAT

Services Provided: Services Provided:

En-Route N En-Route N

Approach/TMA Y Approach/TMA N

Airfield/TWR/GND Y Airfield/TWR/GND N

AIS Y AIS N

MET Y MET N

SAR Y SAR N

TSA/TRA monitoring Y FIS N

Other: Other: N

Additional Information: Additional Information: GAT is provided by respective ATS units (ACCs) of the Integrated Civil-Military ATM System.

IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?

OAT only GAT only Both OAT and GAT

If Military fly OAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:

Free Routing Within specific corridors only

Within the regular (GAT) national route network Under radar control

Within a special OAT route system Under radar advisory service

If Military fly GAT-IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:

No special arrangements Exemption from Route Charges

Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures Provision of ATC in UHF

CNS exemptions: RVSM 8.33 Mode S ACAS

Others: Some transport aircraft are approved for flight in RVSM airspace.


1.4 Airports

1.4.1 General information

The airport network in Ukraine comprises 38 certified aerodromes of which 25 have international checkpoints.

Kyiv Boryspil International Airport, the only airport covered in this LSSIP edition, is the main international airport in Ukraine and accounts for over 45% of all IFR operations at Ukrainian airports/aerodromes.

Aerodromes Simferopol’, Odesa, Kyiv Zhuliany, Donetsk, Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovs’k, and L’viv are strategic. Other aerodromes are domestic. In accordance with international standards, the service zone of strategic aerodromes is within 200-250km.

1.4.2 Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP

The criteria to determine the airports covered by this LSSIP document are:

- the main national airport of the State; - the airports identified as potentially having an effect upon the network in terms of ATFM delays

the airports with more than 150,000 commercial air transport movement in 2011; - the Airports contained in Table 8 of Part 4, Annex B of the ESSIP Plan Edition 2012.

According to these criteria the airport covered in this LSSIP is Kiev Boryspil International Airport.

1.5 Accident/incident Investigation Body

1.5.1 Technical investigations

The National Accident Investigation Bureau with civilian aircraft was established under Article 9 of the Air Code of Ukraine and of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine Regulation №228 dated 21 March 2012. The National Accident Investigation Bureau with civilian aircraft and became operational from 01 Feb 2013.

1.5.2 Collection, Evaluation & Processing of Data

In order to carry out this function, appropriate software tools are under development by the SAAU.

1.5.3 Civil-Military Accidents/Incidents

The investigations of accidents/incidents with civil aircrafts are provided by the State Independent Investigation Board.


Chapter 2 - Geographical Scope

2.1 International Membership

Ukraine is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:

Organisation Since

ECAC 15.12.1999

EUROCONTROL 01.05.2004

European Union No

European Common Aviation Area No *

EASA No**

ICAO 09.09.1992

NATO No

* Negotiations started for the conclusion of an Common Aviation Area Agreement between Ukraine and EU and its member states.

** 1. Cooperation on the basis of Working Arrangements in the framework of the transition of the Joint Aviation Authorities and on collection and exchange of information on the safety of aircraft using community airports and airports of the relevant country (done at Brussels on 07 March 2007).

2. Working Arrangement between the SAAU and EASA (done at Paris Dec 2009).

2.2 Geographical description of the FIR(s)

The geographical scope of this document addresses Kyiv, Simferopol’, Dnipropetrovs’k, Odesa and L’viv FIRs.

The Ukrainian ATS Airspace is surrounded by 10 FIRs of 9 different States namely, Minsk FIR (Belarus), Moscow FIR and Rostov–na-Donu FIR (Russia), Ankara FIR (Turkey), Varna FIR (Bulgaria), Bucharest FIR (Romania), Chisinau FIR (Moldova), Budapest FIR (Hungary), Bratislava FIR (Slovak Republic) and Warszawa FIR (Poland). Two of the surrounding States, Russia and Belarus, are non-ECAC States.

The Division Flight Level (DFL) separating upper from lower ATS airspace is FL 275.


2.3 ATC units of UkSATSE

The following table lists the ACCs and APPs (with associated FIRs) in the Ukrainian ATS airspace, including the airspace where the provision of ATS is delegated to Ukraine.

Number of sectors

ATC Unit

En-route

TMA

Associated FIR(s) Remarks

Kyiv ACC 7 5 UKBV Kyiv FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL within Kyiv FIR

Simferopol’ ACC 5 2 UKFV Simferopol’ FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL within Simferopol’ FIR

Odesa ACC 3 2 UKOV Odesa FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL within Odesa FIR

L’viv ACC 4 1 UKLV L’viv FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL within L’viv FIR

Dnipropetrovs’k ACC 4 1 UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR ATC + FIS service: GND to UNL within south-west of Dnipropetrovs’k FIR, from FL265 to UNL north and south-east part of Dnipropetrovs’k FIR from FL265 to UNL

Kharkiv APP 3 UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR ATC + FIS service: GND-FL265

within TMA

Donets’k APP 2 UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR ATC + FIS service: GND-FL265

within TMA


Luhans’k APP+TWR 1 UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service

Ivano-Frankivs’k APP+TWR

1 UKLV L’viv FIR APP+TWR service

Uzhhorod APP+TWR 1 UKLV L’viv FIR APP+PAR+TWR service

Zaporizhzhia APP+TWR

1 UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service

Chernivtsi TWR X UKLV L’viv FIR APP+TWR service

Dnipropetrovs’k TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR TWR service

Donets’k TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR TWR service

Kharkiv TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR TWR service

Kryvyi Rih TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service

Kyiv/Boryspil’ TWR X UKBV Kyiv FIR TWR service

Kyiv/Zhuliany TWR X UKBV Kyiv FIR TWR service

L’viv TWR X UKLV L’viv FIR TWR service

Mariupol’ TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service

Mykolaiv TWR X UKOV Odesa FIR APP+TWR service

Odesa TWR X UKOV Odesa FIR TWR service

Rivne TWR X UKLV L’viv FIR APP+TWR service

Simferopol’ TWR X UKFV Simferopol’ FIR TWR service

Vinnytsia/Gavrishivka TWR

X UKBV Kyiv FIR APP+TWR service

Kirovohrad TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service

Poltava TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service

Sevastopol’/Bel’bek TWR

X UKFV Simferopol’ FIR TWR service

Sumy TWR X UKDV Dnipropetrovs’k FIR APP+TWR service

2.3.1 Air traffic control service 5 ACCs (Kyiv, L’viv, Simferopol’, Odesa and Dnipropetrovs’k) provide area and approach control services, flight information and alerting services within CTAs. 6 APPs (Donetsk, Kharkiv, Luhans’k, Ivano-Frankivs’k, Zaporizhzhia and Uzhhorod) provide approach control service within TMAs. 22 TWRs provide aerodrome control service in civil aerodromes Chernivtsi, Dnipropetrovs’k, Donets’k, Ivano-Frankivs’k, Kharkiv, Kirovograd, Kryvyi Rih, Kyiv (Boryspil’), Kyiv (Zhuliany), L’viv, Luhans’k, Mariupol’, Poltava, Mykolaiv, Odesa, Rivne, Sevastopol’ (Bel’bek), Simferopol’, Sumy, Vinnytsia and Zaporizhzhia and within its CTRs. 2.3.2 Flight information service Flight information sectors of ACCs/APPs provide flight information service within FIRs. Flight information service (FIS) is provided:

within controlled airspace (class C, D) – by ATC units (ACCs/APPs/TWRs); outside controlled airspace (class G, GND-1500 AMSL) - by 7 flight information sectors which are

in 5 ACCs (Kyiv – 2 sectors, L’viv – 2 sectors, Simferopol’ – 1 sector, Odesa – 1 sector, Dnipropetrovs’k – 1 sector) and by 2 flight information sectors are situated in APP units (Donets’k – 1 sector, Kharkiv - 1 sector).


2.3.3 Aerodrome flight information service: 6 AFIS units provide flight information service in AFIS aerodromes: Zhytomyr (Ozerne), Severodonets’k, Simferopol’ (Zavods’ke), Ternopil’, Khmelnits’ki and Cherkasy. 2.3.4. Alerting Service All ATS units are responsible to provide alerting service within its area of responsibility according to Ukrainian legislation. ACCs serve as the central point for collecting all information relevant to a state of emergency of an aircraft operating within the flight information region or control area concerned and for forwarding such information to appropriate regional Search and Rescue Co-ordination Centres of the Ministry of Emergencies of Ukraine that are situated in each ACCs. In case of emergency in civil aerodromes concerned TWR informs appropriate service set up within the framework of the search and rescue units and other services and units specified in the related coordination instructions. To collect and share ATS messages, there are:

14 Air Traffic Service Reporting Offices (AROs) at airports: Chernivtsi, Ivano-Frankivs’k, Kirovograd, Kryvyi Rih, Luhans’k, Mariupol’, Poltava, Mykolaiv, Rivne, Sevastopol’ (Bel’bek), Sumy, Uzhhorod, Vinnytsia and Zaporizhzhia;

8 AROs, which belong to briefing offices: Dnipropetrovs’k, Donets’k, Kyiv (Boryspil’), Kyiv(Zhuliany), L’viv, Odesa, Simferopol’ and Kharkiv.


2.4 Airspace Classification and Organisation

The current classification of the airspace in Ukraine is shown in the following picture:

Note: Airspace P, R, D – areas, TSA/TRA, CTR and TMA of military aerodromes of Ukraine is not classified according to ICAO SARPs. Ukrainian airspace and airspace over the high seas where the air traffic services are delegated to Ukraine by international agreements, consists of the following structural elements:

5 Flight Information Regions (Dnipropetrovs’k FIR, Kyiv FIR, L’viv FIR, Odesa FIR and Simferopol’ FIR);

23 CTA Sectors; 23 TMAs which include 3 military TMAs; 46 Control Zones (CTRs) which include 20 military CTRs; 10 Aerodrome Flight Information Zones (AFIZs); Aerodrome Traffic Zones (ATZs) – usually set up for each touchdown pad; 187 ATS routes and routes set up for crossing the state border of Ukraine. Total ATS routes

extension below FL 275 is 38 317 km, FL 275 and above – 45 821 km; 30 Prohibited Areas; 207 Restricted Areas; 76 Danger Areas; 186 Training Areas, 54 of them are stated as temporary airspace reservation; Special rules zone airspace – set up along the state border.


2.4.1 Terminal airspace design Terminal airspace design is based on flight procedures in terminal areas to organise safe and effective air navigation. These procedures include:

Standard instrument departure (SID); Standard instrument arrival (STAR); Instrument approach procedure; Area navigation procedures (RNAV); Visual maneuvering procedures.

During the design process of the mentioned procedures special attention is paid to obstacle clearance altitude/height (OCA/OCH) calculation – minimal altitude or height over the runway threshold or in some cases over the runway elevation, which is used to observe certain criteria of obstacle clearance. Terminal airspace design procedures and terminal design of airspace consider the needs and interests of all the participants of air navigation. For this purpose Air Navigation Service Department of UkSATSE has established close contacts with principal airlines that arrange flights to the airports of Ukraine, navigation services of the airports and ATS units. This complex approach is foreseen by international documents and adapted into the Guidance on Ukrainian airspace structure design. For the proper fulfillment of its main purpose Air Navigation Service Department personnel of UkSATSE that is engaged in the process of design of terminal airspace solve a lot of routine. This personnel works with challenging issues every day, namely: analysis of building (reconstruction) of objects allocation condition since they can be hazardous for air traffic safety, imitation modeling, monitoring of new and improved terminal procedures use, quality control of published air navigation information. Any design procedure task can be fulfilled in short term due to the up-to-date software and highly qualified personnel of the enterprise. One of the main means of terminal airspace development is the introduction of the most up-to-date air navigation methods, based on characteristics (PBN): using navigation fields of available and perspective global satellite systems, such as GPS, GLONASS, EGNOS and developed ground infrastructure of location finding of aircraft during the flight (DME/DME). Navigation based on the characteristics is the necessary condition for the implementation of main innovations such as free route airspace (FRA) and continuous descent approach (CDA). Application of such navigation methods allows using the abilities of modern aircraft facilities as far as possible in order to save fuel, to reduce negative influence on environment, to simplify the work of air crews and air traffic controllers.


Chapter 3 - National Projects

Name Schedule Description – Scope Status Link with ESSIP Obj.

Expected Contribution to the Key Performance Areas1

BTN 2012/2016

Development (upgrade) of the fixed ground communication infrastructure of UkSATSE’s Backbone Telecommunication Network (BTN). The aim of development is to extend existing infrastructure (7 main nodes) to 42 regional units all over Ukraine

Project is in progress COM 10 COM 11

Safety and Capacity

Extension of BTN shall provide the possibility to exchange any type of ATC oriented information (data/voice) between any application within UkSATSE all over Ukraine

Mode S MSSRs 2011/2013

5 new stand-alone Mode S MSSRs are planned to be installed in addition to 5 existing Mode S MSSRs, in order to provide Mode S duplicated coverage.

Project is in progress

Safety and Capacity

Implementation of Mode S (ELS) allows to improve air situation awareness and to increase the responsiveness to air situation changes by:

- receiving of an aircraft identification directly from aircraft

- increasing of flight level data reliability

- increasing of air conflict data reliability

- increasing of radar tracking quality USENET

2012/2015

7 nodes of USENET are planned to be installed in UkSATSE’s Regional Branches:

- Dnipropetrivs’k - Donets’k - Kyiv - L’viv - Odesa - Simferopol’

Development of Technical Requirements is in progress

Safety, Capacity, Cost-efficiency

Network shall provide a single ground transport environment between any resources and users, who are a part of the Surveillance System of Ukraine (SSU), and also between them and other authorised civil and military stakeholders on the territory of Ukraine.

ATC centres 2010/2014 The upgrade of 4 ATC systems for L’viv ACC/APP/TWR, Kharkiv APP/TWR, Dnipropetrovs’k ACC/APP/TWR and Odesa ACC/APP/TWR consists on changing obsolete equipment to new one with extended functionality. Implementation of backup ATC System for Simferopol ACC.

The contracts for installation of ATC systems were signed. Project implementation is in progress

Safety and Capacity

The upgrade of ATC centres will allow to:

- improve the reliability of ATM System operation by using modern computer and telecommunication technologies;

- implement system functionality according to the EUROCONTROL and UkSATSE requirements to ATMS system;

1Capacity, safety, cost-efficiency and environment – as defined in Recital 2 of Regulation (EU) No 691/2010.


- improve the capacity and air traffic safety in the area of UkSATSE`s responsibility

TOWER 2010/2014 Construction of new 3 Towers at civil aerodromes of Ukraine: Kharkiv, Dnipropetrovs'k and Kyiv (Boryspil’).

The contracts for construction of new Towers were signed. Projects are in implementation progress.

Safety and Capacity

The construction of new Towers and procurement of new modular Tower will allow tore-equip them with new modern CNS aids in accordance with the EUROCONTROL’s requirements to TWR ATC units. The result of this activity will increase equipment reliability and maintainability and consequently – safety and capacity of air traffic.

MODULAR TOWER

2013/2017 Procurement of new 7 modular Towers at civil aerodromes of Ukraine: Ivano-Frankivs’k, Zaporizhzhia, Uzhhorod, Luhans’k, Chernivtsi, Mykolaiv and Mariupol’.

Project will start in the beginning of 2013

Safety and Capacity

The procurement of new 7 modular Towers will allow tore-equip them with new modern CNS aids in accordance with EUROCONTROL’s requirements to TWR ATC units. Outcomes of this activity will be increase equipment reliability, maintainability and consequently – safety and capacity of air traffic.

SMR 2012/2015 Installation of 8 Surface Movement Radars (SMR) for main Ukrainian civil aerodromes: 2 SMRs for Kyiv (Boryspil’) and 1 for: Donets’k, Simferopol’, Kharkiv, Odesa, L’viv and Dnipropetrovs’k

Project is in progress Safety and Capacity

Implementation of SMRs will allow to improve the manoeuvring area awareness and to increase the responsiveness to ground situation changes in the absence of visual observation of all or part of the manoeuvring area due to:

- providing radar monitoring of traffic on the manoeuvring area;

- providing directional information to pilots and vehicle drivers as necessary;

- providing advice and assistance for the safe and efficient movement of aircraft and vehicles on the manoeuvring area.

SOFTWARE TOOL

2013/2014 Procurement of instrument procedure design software tool to improve quality assurance in accordance with ICAO 9906 – “Quality Assurance Manual for Flight Procedure Design”

Project will start in the beginning of 2013.

NAV03 Safety and Cost-efficiency

Improvement of safety due to improvement in procedures design and cost effectiveness due to automation in the overall process.

Upgrade of Terminal Radars

2011/2015

Upgraded terminal PSR/SSRs will be installed in 6 civil aerodromes of Ukraine to provide radar service. 2 new terminal radars (PSR/MSSR Mode S) will be installed in 2013.

The project has started.

Safety and Capacity

Implementation of the project allows to improve the quality of air situation awareness and surveillance quality (double coverage)

Rationalisation of navigation infrastructure

2011/2015 Installation and implementation of 5 NDBs: 2 – for Chernivtsi aerodrome,

2 – for Ivano-Frankivs’k aerodrome,

1 – for Uzhhorod aerodrome.

Installation is in progress.

Safety

Improvement of flight safety and navigation infrastructure on the airspace of Ukraine.


VSAT 2012/2015 Installation of new equipment in Dnipropetrovs’k, Simferopol’ and Odesa for modernization and extension of satellite communication system VSAT.

It is expected that a Call for Tender (CfT) procedure will be initiated in 2013

Safety

VSAT equipment as a back-up means the provision of reliable voice communication between adjacent ACC of the Black Sea region States.

Modernization of CMASS

2013 Implementation of specialized software for decode and render of WAREP and SYNOP data in the centre of CMASS:

UkSATSE’s Regional Branch Kyiv

Project will start in mid of 2013

Safety and Capacity

The modernisation of Central meteorological aeronavigation system will allow to increase the level of meteorological services

Modernization of CMASS

2013 Implementation of additional hardware for visualization of meteorological information for the ATCOs of Flight Information Centres (FIC) in UkSATSE’s Regional Branches:

- Dnipropetrovs’k

- Donets’k

- Kyiv

- L’viv

- Odesa

- Simferopol’

The project will start in mid of 2013

Safety

The modernisation of Central meteorological aeronavigation system will allow to increase the level of flight information service

Upgrade of

SOFTWARE

2013 Upgrading of software of VOLMET in UkSATSE’s Regional Branches:

- Dnipropetrovs’k

- Kyiv

- L’viv

- Simferopol’

The project will start at the end of 2013

Safety and Capacity

The upgrading of software will allow to increase the level of flight information service

Upgrade of

SOFTWARE

2013 Upgrading of software of ATIS systems in UkSATSE’s Regional Branches:

- Dnipropetrovs’k

- Donets’k

- Kyiv

- L’viv

- Odesa

- Simferopol’

The project will start at the end of 2013

Safety and Capacity

The upgrading of software will allow to increase the level of flight information service in TMA

Development of systems of radar observations

2013/2014 Feasibility study and Implementation of Weather radar in UkSATSE’s Regional Branch Odessa


Safety and Capacity

The introduction of Weather radar will provide information about the development of dangerous convective phenomena, their movement and evolution.


Enhancement

of ATIS systems

2013 Purchase of equipment for visualization of index of ATIS messages in UkSATSE’s Regional Branches:

- Dnipropetrovs’k

- Donets’k

- Kyiv

- L’viv

- Odesa

- Simferopol’


Safety

The purchase of equipment for visualization of index of ATIS messages will allow to increase the level of flight information service in TMA


Chapter 4 - Regional Co-ordination and Projects

No cross-border FAB project is envisaged in Ukraine for the moment.

4.1 Regional Co-ordination

In order to achieve some of the ESSIP objectives, Ukrainian ACC(s) will have to co-ordinate actions with a number of foreign adjacent ACCs/UAC, as indicated in the CIP Status Report.

The LSSIP document will help foster regional co-ordination with neighbouring states by identifying mutually dependent actions.

Co-operation has been established with Belarus, Poland, Hungary, the Slovak Republic, Romania, Moldova, Bulgaria, Turkey and the Russian Federation concerning airspace structure, ATS route planning, co-ordination methods and ATM procedures.

4.2 International workshops

The following events took place:

A Legal Workshop “The essence of legislation in the fast changing world of aviation”, Kyiv, 20-21 October 2012 was organized in the framework of EU-funded project “Support to the integration of Ukraine into the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T)” ;

EUROCONTROL/SAA PMP Workshop, 25-26 January 2012, Kyiv, Ukraine; EU TRACECA Civil Aviation Project II, Regional Opening Seminar, Kyiv, Ukraine 14-16 February

2012; TRACECA Civil Aviation Safety/EASA (1st Assessment Mission) to SAA Ukraine, Kyiv, 23-27

July 2012.

During 17-21 September 2012, a five-day International theoretical and practical Conference and the 32nd Meeting of the Coordinative Advising Aeromedical Council (CAAC) of the Interstate Aviation Committee were held in Ukraine. This attests to the high level of development of medical and sanitary supply of civil aviation in Ukraine. In the aviation industry, health of the employees is the necessary condition of professional aptitude, as much as aeronautical medicine is an important factor in flight safety.

4.3 Common Aviation Area Agreement

Ukraine is not a Member of the European Union and presently is not in the applicability area of the Single European Sky however, Ukraine has the intention to conclude an Common Aviation Area Agreement with the European Union. By Presidential Decree dated 19 October, 2007 № 891/2007 a mandate was given to a specially established Delegation to negotiate an ECAA Agreement with the EU. To assist the Delegation, the SAAU organised 4 working groups (economics, environment, safety and industry) to prepare a draft for such an agreement. The EC established 4 working groups with the same subjects as well. For this reporting period six high level meetings and a number of working meetings were organised in order to draft a text of the Agreement. Ukraine has the intention to complete negotiations on the draft Common Aviation Area Agreement with the European Union in 2013. In the meantime, Ukraine is taking steps to harmonise its national legislation with the related EC Regulations and Directives.


4.4 EU Twinning Project for Airports, Aerodromes and Air Navigation Service of Ukraine

On the 15-th of November 2011 a high level meeting dedicated to the EU Twinning project “Support of implementation of EU norms and standards in the sphere of airports, aerodromes and air navigation service” took place. Representatives from the European Commission, EUROCONTROL, Ukraine, Sweden and Spain participated in the meeting.

The main goal of the Project is to support a stable development of the civil aviation of Ukraine, harmonization of rules and experience in accordance with the international ICAO standards, best international practices, as well as current and future EU rules in the context of airports, airdromes and air navigation service.

The project is focusing on development of the legislative base pursuant to the Agreement on the European Common Aviation Area (ECAA) (signature is expected) and on the institutional development, including increase in the administrative potential of the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine and other correspondent institutions, for provision of aviation arrangements according to the standards and recommended practices of ICAO (SARPs) and EU legislation in aviation.

4.5 Regional cooperation

4.5.1 Safety Oversight Organization (RSOO)

After having independently analyzed the consequences of transfer of competencies from JAA to EASA, the conclusion of JAA Arrangements and it’s impact on the non-EU/ECAC Member States, and after having estimated available resources and respective aviation sector needs, Directors General of Civil Aviation of Azerbaijan, Moldova, Turkey and Ukraine held a meeting in Yalta, Ukraine (6-10 August 2008) to discuss cooperation in the light of those mentioned challenges.

As an outcome of this meeting the Joint Declaration was signed, defining coordinated positions in view of safety oversight system change at Pan-European level. The intention is to create the Regional Safety Oversight Organization in the Black Sea – Caspian region (RSOO) - by means of signing the Memorandum of Cooperation (MoC) in future was agreed.

To realize this intention the International RSOO Task Force was created. It comprises representatives from Civil Aviation Authorities of Azerbaijan, Moldova, Turkey and Ukraine.

The above mentioned initiative was supported by ICAO. The ICAO Secretariat defined a Focal point to support the RSOO creation. Due to ICAO assistance the MoC and its Annexes were amended to meet the requirements of ICAO Doc 9734, Part B.

The initiative of the RSOO creation was also supported by EUROCONTROL. As a result of the direct support, the Concept Document for Regional Safety Oversight, namely in the ATM part was elaborated.

During the years 2008-2010 several joint meetings of Directors General and International RSOO Task Force were held.

During last meeting of Directors General of the Civil Aviation Authorities of Azerbaijan, Turkey and Ukraine, which was held in December 2010, all parties reiterated their readiness for cooperation with such international organizations and structures as ECAC/EUROCONTROL, ICAO and European Commission, EASA and Interstate Aviation Committee (IAC).

Pending the harmonized legislation of Azerbaijan, Moldova, Turkey and Ukraine in the fields of operations, airworthiness and aerodromes it was decided to establish regional activity in the fields of ATM and SAFA since nothing prevents them from the joint cooperative activity in these areas. It was also agreed that in the fields of operations, airworthiness and aerodromes mutual cooperation will be carried out at the level of training, organization of joint meetings and technical assistance.

During the last meeting of the International RSOO Task Force, which was held in the EUROCONTROL HQ on 26 May 2010, MoC and its Annexes were worked out.

Currently the approval and signing of the MoC and the ways of the realization of the RSOO activities are in the negotiation process between the Civil Aviation Authorities of Azerbaijan, Moldova, Turkey and Ukraine.

Meanwhile the Civil Aviation Administration of Azerbaijan reserved its right to participate in the RSOO as an Observer until national formalities would be completed.


4.5.2. Black Sea-Caspian Rotation Group

On 11 Jan 2013 the meeting of the CAA representatives from Azerbaijan, Georgia, Turkey, Moldova and Ukraine agreed to increase the cooperation and to establish the Black Sea-Caspian Rotation Group (BSCG) to be represented at the ICAO Council. Currently the Parties to BSCG are working on conclusion of the Memorandum of Understanding.

4.6 MoC between DHMI and UkSATSE On 20th June 2012 the UkSATSE and DHMI have signed a Memorandum of Co-operation (MoC). This MoC should be evaluated in the context of and contributing to the regional co-operation in South-Eastern Europe and proposes actions to be taken by two Air Navigation Services Providers in order to enhance co-operation and co-ordination on ATM and CNS domains. There are two aspects at the MoC which define different cooperation lists:

1) Operational, consisting of:

- Harmonised ATM procedures and potential interface areas for improvements. - Airspace design and ATS route network. - Common operational activities. - ATC requirements for Flexible Use of Airspace.

2) Technical, consisting of:

- Technical activities in relation with the ATM systems. - Exchanging information and sharing experience on, equipment and technologies used. - Harmonising the procedures and training of technical staff.

The first bilateral meeting at operational level between representatives of DHMI and UkSATSE was held in Ankara, Turkey 6-7 November 2012.

During the meeting representatives of DHMI and UkSATSE discussed topics of common interest in terms of: harmonisation of ATM procedures in the interface of Turkish and Ukrainian airspace, development of the route network, improvement of co-ordination between technical staff, plans for development of the ATC systems and airports in Turkey etc.

The representatives of DHMI and UkSATSE also exchanged information concerning financial and economic issues.

4.7 Project Management Plan for EUROCONTROL support

The Agreement for EUROCONTROL`s support to the State Aviation Administration of Ukraine has been signed on 22/10/2010 by DG of Eurocontrol and Chairman of SAAU.

The relevant Project Management Plan (PMP) was developed and approved on 30/06/2011.

The PMP includes following working packages (WP):

WP0: Project Management - Completed (PMP V2.0 was signed by EUROCONTROL and Ukraine);

WP1: Assessment of the ATM/ANS regulations – Completed; WP2: Secondment of an SAAU expert to EUROCONTROL/DSS - in progress; WP3: Common development and production of a Strategic Business Plan in line with SIS

methodology: A 2-day courses were given by EUROCONTROL to Ukrainian UkSATSE and SAAU staff on 13-14 July and on 25-26 January 2012. A draft of Strategic Business Plan was developed.

WP4: Assessment of Service Provision - Completed;


WP5: Assessment of civil-military component: Completed; WP6: Assessment of risks and their mitigation regarding fir’s borders with non-EUROCONTROL

MS airspace - Completed; WP7: Support in the development of a Ukrainian performance scheme - in progress; From

September to November 2012 two persons from UkSATSE were seconded to the PRU. They received training and elaborated draft of the RP1 Ukrainian Performance Plan. In a framework of deliverable D05b it is planned to develop Ukrainian Performance Plan for RP2.

WP8: Support during the establishment of the NSA – Completed. A 2-day course was given by EUROCONTROL to Ukrainian UkSATSE and SAAU staff on 25-26 January 2012.

In the context of the “Agreement” it was agreed that EUROCONTROL will provide support to the Future ATM Development of Ukraine Project. The support is foreseen by Working Package 9 and concerns the following domains:

- Operational concept definition;

- Preliminary sectorisation options;

- CNS Infrastructure Analysis;

- Human performance considerations;

- Safety assessment;

- Business case development.

WP9 will investigate the feasibility of the Future ATM Development and the different tasks in WP9 will provide input to the feasibility study.

The project will be performed with involvement of SAA (and UkSATSE where appropriate) staff in order to achieve appropriate ownership.

4.8 EURO 2012 outcome

In June 2012 Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise (UkSATSE) provided Air Navigation Service for 17 892 flights at five aerodromes of four cities which hosted Euro-2012 that means 31,6 % more traffic than within a similar period of the previous year.

Air Traffic Service Units provided services for the following number of take-offs and landings performed by Ukrainian and foreign airlines at aerodromes used during the championship: Kyiv (Boryspil) – 9 784 (+2,9 %), Donetsk – 2 576 (+79,4 %), Kharkiv – 1 374 (+77,3 %), Kyiv (Zhuliany) – 2 750 (+132,9 %), Lviv – 1 408 (+103,5 %).

However, the potential of air space capacity in Flight Information Regions was not used in full and air traffic controllers work load has not reached maximum permissible figures. All that became possible due to a large-scale phased preparation of UkSATSE Air Traffic Service Units.

In the process of preparation the capacity of Area Control Centers Sectors and cities aerodromes that hosted the championship was modelled taking into account the maximum work load expected during the days of matches. The air space structure changes were duly published in Air Navigation Documents of Ukraine. Air Traffic Services personnel has been also trained according to the special programme that included organizational, procedural and regulatory changes.

It was important to take appropriate measures on Air Traffic Flows Planning and to perform direct flight coordination during Euro-2012 in close cooperation with Central Flow Management Unit (CFMU) of EUROCONTROL. Highly skilled specialists of Air Navigation Service Unit of UkSATSE were specially seconded to CFMU office in Brussels for the whole period of the championship. In spite of high level of


coordination, at night after the final match, more than 60 aircraft per hour were taking off from aerodromes of Kyiv (Boryspil) and Kyiv (Zhuliany), within a few hours after the end of the match that is more than one aircraft – every minute.

Good quality, effectiveness and safety of air traffic control provided during the period of the high flight intensity were possible due to improvement of air traffic service procedures, modernization of automated air traffic control systems and other technical aids, construction and reconstruction of air navigation facilities, refresher training of personnel, etc. Thus, UkSATSE specialists have passed another test in a proper manner and retained the image of Ukraine as an aviation state.

LSSIP 2013-2017 Ukraine Released Issue

LSSIP 2013-2017

PART - ESSIP OBJECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION

LSSIP 2013-2017 Ukraine Realesed Issu


Conventions

Two colour codes are used for each ESSIP Objective ‘box’:

o one colour code is used to show the Objective Scope in the Objective ID cell, and

o another colour code is used to show the Objective Progress in the State and for each national stakeholder.

Obj. ID (*) Obj. Title (By mm/yyyy of overall objective, inc non-State SloAs) Obj. Progress (**)

State’s high level progress statement State Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) REG

(By:mm-yyyy) REG high level progress statement APO Impl. Date ASP. Progress (**) ASP

(By:mm-yyyy) ASP high level progress statement ASP Impl. Date MIL. Progress (**) MIL

(By:mm-yyyy) MIL high level progress statement MIL Impl. Date APO. Progress (**) APO

(By:mm-yyyy) APO high level progress statement APO Impl. Date

(*) Objective Scope Code: (**) Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:

SES and SESAR ECIP Completed No Plan

ECAC Pan-European Partially Completed Not Applicable

EU+ Planned Missing Data

Multi-N Multi-National Late

APT Airport related


Chapter 5 - ATM Safety

GEN01 Implement European ANS contingency measures for Safety Critical Modes of Operation (By:12/2008 / Active) Completed

At regulatory level, the contingency aspects indicated in Commission Regulation (EU) No 1035/2011 are included in the national rules for ANSP certification (Order of Ministry of Transport and Communications of Ukraine N42 dated 22.1.2007 with amendments).

12/2007

Completed REG (By:06/2008)

Rules for ANSP certification (Order of Ministry of Transport and Communications of Ukraine N42 dated 22.1.2007). 01/2007

Completed ASP (By:06/2008)

Contingency measures were implemented in all UkSATSE ATS units according to amendment 42 to ICAO Annex 11 (Order of UkSATSE N321 dated 20.10.2010). 12/2007

Not Applicable MIL (By:06/2008)

Contingency measures are in place however, not fully compliant with EU regulation ‐

SAF04 Implement measures to reduce the risk of level bust occurrences (By:01/2008 / Active) Late

The SAA made preliminary assessment of the European Action Plan for the prevention of level bust and of the level bust toolkit and related material. As a result, actions have been included in the State Air Navigation Development Programme, which was approved by Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 44 dated 13/01/2010.

12/2013

Late

REG (By:01/2008)

The SAA made preliminary assessment of the European Action Plan for the prevention of level bust and of the level bust toolkit and related material. As a result, appropriate were included in the State Air Navigation Development Programme, which was approved by Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 44 dated 13/01/2010.

12/2013

Late ASP (By:01/2007) There is an action plan approved by the DG of UkSATSE to implement SAF04.

12/2013

No Plan MIL (By:01/2008) There some specific procedures in place but not compliant with ECTL doc

‐

SAF05 Implement measures to prevent air/ground communications induced safety occurrences. (By:01/2010 / Active) Late

The SAA made assessment of the European Action Plan for the prevention of air/ground communication induced safety occurrences. As a result, actions have been included in the State Air Navigation Development Programme, which was approved by Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 44 dated 13/01/2010.

06/2013

Late

REG (By:01/2010)

The SAA made preliminary assessment of the European Action Plan for the prevention of air/ground communication induced safety occurrences. As a result, actions have been included in the State Air Navigation Development Programme, which was approved by Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 44 dated 13/01/2010

06/2013

Late ASP (By:01/2010) There is an action plan approved by the DG of UkSATSE to implement SAF05

01/2013


SAF10 Implement measures to reduce the risk to aircraft operations caused by airspace infringements (By:12/2011 / Active) Late

The SAA made preliminary assessment of the European Action Plan for the reduction of airspace infringements. As a result, actions have been included in the State Air Navigation Development Programme, which was approved by Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 44 dated 13/01/2010

12/2013

Late

REG (By:12/2011)

The SAA made preliminary assessment of the European Action Plan for the reduction of airspace infringements. As a result, actions have been included in the State Air Navigation Development Programme, which was approved by Decree of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine No 44 dated 13/01/2010

12/2013

Late ASP (By:12/2011) There is an action plan approved by the DG of UkSATSE to implement SAF10

12/2013

No Plan MIL (By:12/2011) There some specific procedures in place but not compliant with ECTL doc

‐

SRC-AUDI Implementation of Safety Regulatory Auditing by National Supervisory Authorities (NSA) (By:12/2010 / Active) Completed

Safety Regulatory Auditing are fully implemented and executed since 2007 by the SAA in accordance with EUROCONTROLs procedures. The second edition of ‐The Regulation for the Safety Oversight in ATM System‐ was approved (MTCU order N° 320, dated 31/05/2010)

12/2007

Completed

REG (By:12/2010)

Safety Regulatory Auditing are fully implemented and executed since 2007 by the SAA in accordance with EUROCONTROLs procedures. The second edition of ‐The Regulation for the Safety Oversight in ATM System‐ was approved (MTCU order N° 320, dated 31/05/2010)

12/2007

Completed MIL (By:12/2010)

General Inspection for safety issues from MOD are executed, records kept and publications produced. 12/2007

SRC-CHNG Implementation of Safety Oversight of Changes to ATM by National Supervisory Authorities (NSA) (By:12/2010 / Active) Completed

The Safety Oversight of Changes are fully implemented and executed since 2007 by the SAA in accordance with EUROCONTROLs procedures.

12/2007

Completed

REG (By:12/2010)

The Safety Oversight of Changes are fully implemented and executed since 2007 by the SAA in accordance with EUROCONTROLs procedures. The second edition of ‐The Regulation for the Safety Oversight in ATM System‐ was approved (MTCU order N° 320, dated 31/05/2010)

12/2007

Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2010) Mil does not provide service to GAT traffic.

‐

SRC-OVCA Implementation of ATM Safety Oversight Capabilities by NSAs (By:12/2010 / Active) Completed

The ATM Safety Oversight Capabilities are fully implemented and executed since 2007 by the SAA iaw EUROCONTROLs procedures.

12/2007

Completed

REG (By:12/2010)

The ATM Safety Oversight Capabilities are fully implemented and executed since 2007 by the SAA iaw EUROCONTROLs procedures. The second edition of ‐The Regulation for the Safety Oversight in ATM System‐ was approved (MTCU order N° 320, dated 31/05/2010)

12/2007

Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2010) The military MOD does not have a separate NSA however it is being considered.

‐


SRC-RLMK Implement the EUROCONTROL Safety Regulatory Requirements (ESARRs) (By:12/2010 / Active) Late

The 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 ESARRs are fully implemented at the level of regulations. The second edition of ‐The Regulation for the Safety Oversight in ATM System‐ was approved (MTCU order N° 320, dated 31/05/2010). ESARR 5, is foreseen by end 2013.

12/2013

Late

REG (By:12/2010)

The 1, 2, 3, 4, 6 ESARRs are fully implemented at the level of regulations. The second edition of ‐The Regulation for the Safety Oversight in ATM System‐ was approved (MTCU order N° 320, dated 31/05/2010). For ESARR 5, complementary national rules are still being drafted and foreseen to be ready by end 2013.

12/2013

Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2010) Military comply with their safety criteria for OAT and never control GAT.

‐

SRC-SLRD Safety Levels and Resolution of Deficiencies (By:12/2010 / Active) Late

The acceptable level of safety and process of its constant review are established by SAA ("Regulation for the Safety Oversight in Air Traffic Management" dated 31/05/2010 N 320).The Air Code was approved by the Ukrainian Parliament with establishment of the main principles of Just Culture. It is expected that the Criminal Code will be amended in the line of a Just Culture principles.

12/2013

Late

REG (By:12/2010)

The acceptable level of safety and process of its constant review are established by SAA ("Regulation for the Safety Oversight in Air Traffic Management" dated 31/05/2010 N 320). The Air Code was approved by the Ukrainian Parliament with establishment of the main principles of Just Culture. It is expected that the Criminal Code will be amended in the line of a Just Culture principles.

12/2013

Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2010) Military comply with their safety criteria for OAT

01/2007


Chapter 6 - Airspace Organisation and Management

AOM13.1 Harmonize Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling (By:12/2018 / Active) Planned

Common principles, rules and procedures are in place. Further harmonisation in‐line with EUROCONTROL Guidelines are to be carried out. A new Air Code for Ukraine was published and entered in force in 16 September 2011. The new addition of Regulation on the use of Airspace of Ukraine and the Rules of use of Airspace of Ukraine were drafted. A special working group is in the process of being created to produce General Air Rules (for Civil and State Aviation).

12/2018

Planned

REG (By:12/2018)

Common principles, rules and procedures are in place but not fully compliant with the new EUROCONTROL Guidelines. Further harmonisation in line with EUROCONTROLs Guidelines are to be carried out. A new Air Code for Ukraine was published and entered in force in 16 September 2011. The new addition of Regulation on the use of Airspace of Ukraine and the Rules for Airspace utilisation of Ukraine were drafted. A special working group is in the process of being created to produce General Air Rules (for Civil and State Aviation).

State Air Navigation Development Programme 2010‐2014

12/2018

Planned

ASP (By:12/2018)

Procedures are in place but not fully compliant with the new EUROCONTROL Guidelines. Further harmonisation in line with EUROCONTROLs Guidelines are to be carried out. The new addition of Regulation on the use of Airspace of Ukraine and the Rules of use of Airspace of Ukraine were drafted. A special working group is in the process of being created to produce General Air Rules (for Civil and State Aviation).


12/2018

Planned

MIL (By:12/2018)

Common principles, rules and procedures are in place. A special working group is in the process of being created to produce General Air Rules (for Civil and State Aviation).


12/2014

AOM19 Implement Advanced Airspace Management (By:12/2015 / Active) Planned

FUA Level 1, 2 and 3 are all implemented. Reference to a regulation from Cabinet of Minister of Ukraine, N 44 dated 13/01/2010 ‐ art. 63 of the State Air Navigation Development Programme 2010‐2014 ‐ approving amongst others, the implementation of improved FUA.

12/2015

Planned

ASP (By:12/2015)



12/2015

Planned

MIL (By:12/2015)



12/2015


AOM20 Implement ATS Route Network (ARN) - Version 7 (By:10/2013 / Active) Partially Completed

Relevant proposals which are listed in ANNEX D European ARN V‐7 Concept of Operations and Catalogue of Projects were implemented and published by amendments to AIP. 10/2013

Partially Completed

ASP (By:10/2013)

Relevant proposals which are listed in ANNEX D European ARN V‐7 Concept of Operations and Catalogue of Projects were implemented and published by amendments to AIP.


10/2013

Partially Completed

MIL (By:10/2013)

Military will support and follow UkSATSE plans for the implementation of ARN V7. Proposals of ANNEX D European ARN V‐7 Concept of Operations and Catalogue of Projects up to 12/2012 were agreed and published by amendments to AIP. Flight planning procedures adapted in accordance with ARN V7 airspace structure


10/2013


Chapter 7 - Air Traffic Control & Data Processing Systems

ATC02.2 Implement ground based safety nets - Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) - level 2 (By:01/2013 / Active) Late

All ACCs are using STCA Level 1 and Level 2. Ukraine formal policy for STCA in line with EUROCONTROL Specification is developed and approved (Rules of ATS surveillance services, Order of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine No. 521 dated 07/11/2011). Safety oversight of the changes will be organised in 2013

12/2013

Planned REG (By:01/2013)

All ACCs are using STCA Level 1 and Level 2. Safety oversight of the changes will be conducted in 2013 01/2013

Late

ASP (By:01/2013)

STCA function is implemented, documented and in operational use. The UkSATSE formal policy for STCA in line with EUROCONTROL Specification is developed and approved (Rules of ATS surveillance services, Order of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine No. 521 dated 07/11/2011). Safety assessment for changes is in progress. The training will be applied in 2013.

12/2013

Not Applicable MIL (By:01/2013) Implementation of STCA is N/A as the Mil does not provide services to GAT.

‐

ATC02.5 Implement ground based safety nets - Area Proximity Warning - level 2 (By:12/2016 / Active) Partially Completed

All ACCs are using APW Level 1 and Level 2. Ukraine formal policy for APW in line with EUROCONTROL Specification is developed and approved (Rules of ATS surveillance services, Order of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine No. 521 dated 07/11/2011).

12/2013

Partially Completed

ASP (By:12/2016)

APW function is implemented, documented and in operational use. The UkSATSE formal policy for APW in line with EUROCONTROL Specification is developed and approved (Rules of ATS surveillance services, Order of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine No. 521 dated 07/11/2011). The training will be applied in 2013.

12/2013

Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2016) Military does not supply ATS surveillance services to GAT.

‐

ATC02.6 Implement ground based safety nets - Minimum Safe Altitude Warning - level 2 (By:12/2016 / Active) Partially Completed

All ACCs are using MSAW Level 1 and Level 2. Ukraine formal policy for MSAW in line with EUROCONTROL Specification is developed and approved (Rules of ATS surveillance services, Order of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine No. 521 dated 07/11/2011).

12/2013

Partially Completed

ASP (By:12/2016)

MSAW function is implemented, documented and in operational use. The UkSATSE formal policy for MSAW in line with EUROCONTROL Specification is developed and approved (Rules of ATS surveillance services, Order of the Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine No. 521 dated 07/11/2011). The training will be applied in 2013.

12/2013

Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2016) Military does not supply ATS surveillance services to GAT.

‐


ATC02.7 Implement ground based safety nets - Approach Path Monitor - level 2 (By:12/2016 / Active) Planned

Approach Path Monitor ‐ level 2 will be implemented under Objective ATC02.6 12/2016

Planned ASP (By:12/2016) Approach Path Monitor ‐ level 2 will be implemented under Objective ATC02.6

12/2016

Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2016) Mil has own existing facilities as alternative for Approach Path Monitor

‐

ATC07.1 Implement arrival management tools (By:12/2015 / Active) Completed

Initial arrival management tools are implemented in Kyiv ACC providing ATC for Kyiv TMA. Taking into account the arrival traffic density over the LSSIP timeframe the objective ATC07.1 is implemented for Kyiv TMA only.

03/2012

Completed

ASP (By:12/2015)

Initial arrival management tools are implemented in Kyiv ACC providing ATC for Kyiv TMA. Taking into account the arrival traffic density over the LSSIP timeframe the objective ATC07.1 is implemented for Kyiv TMA only.

03/2012

ATC12 Implement automated support for conflict detection and conformance monitoring (By:12/2016 / Active) Planned

The objective is partially completed for all ACCs, except of Kyiv ACC. Implementing in Kyiv ACC is expected at he beginning of 2013. Additionally Donetsk and Kharkiv extended TMA will include conflict detection and conformance monitoring tools as well.

01/2015

Planned

REG (By:12/2016)

Ukraine is participating in the FASTI project. Approval of the risk and safety assessment. Approval of MTCD and conformance monitoring functions and associated operational procedures.

12/2014

Partially Completed

ASP (By:12/2016)

Conflict detection and conformance monitoring tools is already implemented in Kiev FIR, Simferopol FIR, Dnipropetrovsk FIR, Odesa FIR and Donetsk TMA.Conflict detection and conformance monitoring tools will be updated in Kharkiv TMA and Lviv FIR in 2013.

12/2013

ATC15 Implement, in En-Route operations, information exchange mechanisms, tools and procedures in support of Basic AMAN operations (By:12/2017 / Active) No Plan

Taking into account the traffic demand and capacity shortage issues the AMAN functionality will be implemented within Kiev TMA only. Kiev ACC and Kiev TMA use the same FDP database in this way the access for common flight data including AMAN sequence available at any working position. However HMI improvement for Kiev ACC sectors in respect to exact fulfilment of the task objective will be analyzed during 2013‐2014 years.

12/2013

No Plan

REG (By:12/2017)


12/2013

No Plan

ASP (By:12/2017)


12/2013


ATC16 Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 (By:12/2015 / Active) Planned

Appropriate actions are planned to be done till 12/2015 12/2015

Planned REG (By:12/2015) Appropriate actions are planned to be done till 12/2015

12/2015


A monitoring system of the performance of ACAS in the ATC environment is in place The training plan and package approved. All concerned personnel are trained. 04/2012

Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2015) Requirements of EASA do not applicable to the state aircrafts of Ukraine

‐

ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer (By:12/2018 / Active) No Plan

The new ESSIP objective currently under review to define the scope of applicability ‐

No Plan REG (By:12/2018)


No Plan ASP (By:12/2018)


ITY-COTR

Implementation of ground-ground automated co-ordination processes (By:02/2015 / Active)

(Outside Applicability Area) Planned

All Ukrainian ATC systems implemented OLDI Standard version 2.3 under objective ATC03.1. No impacts on safety, capacity and cost effectiveness are identified in comparison with OLDI Specification 4.2. SAA ensure oversight of all changes to Ukrainian ATS systems during its certification.

02/2015

Completed REG (By:12/2012)

SAA ensure oversight of all changes to Ukrainian ATS system during its certification. 12/2012

Planned

ASP (By:02/2015)

All Ukrainian ATC systems implemented OLDI Standard version 2.3 under objective ATC03.1. No impacts on safety, capacity and cost effectiveness are identified in comparison with OLDI Specification 4.2. Note: Due to unavailability the OLDI functionality in Moscow ACC and Kishinev ACC automatic coordination is not available with such ATS centers.

02/2015

Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2012) Ukraine is outside of applicable area

‐


Chapter 8 - Traffic Flow and Capacity Management

FCM01 Implement enhanced tactical flow management services (By:12/2006 / Active) Late

It is planned to implement ETFMS in all Ukrainian ACCs (ATC systems). Implementation will be executed after upgrading of ATC systems and delivery of Entry Nodes equipment from CFMU ot Ukraine.

12/2013

Late

ASP (By:12/2006)

It is planned to implement ETFMS in UkSATSE ATC systems of Dnipropetrovsk, Kyiv, Lviv, Odesa, and Simferopol ACCs. Implementation will be executed after upgrading of ATC systems and installation of ETFMS Entry Nodes in Kiev ACC. Standard Correlated Position Data from all Ukraininan ACCs will be transferred to ATM system in Kiev ACC. So then the supply ETFMS with Standard Correlated Position Data will be implemented through the centralized data provision from Kiev ACC.

12/2013

Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2001) Service provided by ANSP.

‐

FCM03 Implement collaborative flight planning (By:12/2012 / Active) Late

All Ukrainian ATC systems provide flight plan message processing in ICAO format and automatically process FPLs derived from RPLs. UkSATSE plans to process flight plan messages in ADEXP format as soon as Objective COM10 and ATC modernisation is completed.

12/2014

Late

ASP (By:12/2012)

All UkSATSE ATM systems provide flight plan message processing in ICAO format. UkSATSE plans to process flight plan messages in ADEXP format as soon as Objective COM10 and ATC modernisation is completed. The flight plan message processing in ADEXP format will be performed when objective COM10 is completed. The AFP message will be automatically provided by all ATC systems in ADEXP format according to systems installation/modernization schedule as follow: ‐Kiev ACC ‐ completed 02/2012, ‐Donetsk APP, completed 10/2012, ‐Kharkiv APP, replacement 02/2013, ‐Lviv ACC, replacement 12/2013, ‐Odesa ACC, partially completed 10/2012, ‐Simferopol ACC, partially completed 09/2012, ‐Dnipropetrovsk ACC, completed 12/2011.

12/2014

Late MIL (By:12/2006) Special Order was signed between MOD and MOT in 2010.

12/2014


Chapter 9 - Aeronautical Information Management

INF04 Implement integrated briefing (By:12/2012 / Active) Completed

Integrated briefing is implemented in UkSATSE and at the following international airports: Kyiv (Boryspil), Lviv, Kyiv (Zhuliany), Kharkiv, Donetsk, Dnipropetrovsk, Odesa and Simferopol. Military AIS is under responsibility of Ministry of Defence of Ukraine. There are no plans to apply any international practices/procedures/guidelines in AIS operations for the time being.

12/2007


Integrated briefing is implemented in UkSATSE and at the following international airports: Kyiv (Boryspil), Lviv, Kyiv (Zhuliany), Kharkiv, Donetsk, Dnipropetrovsk, Odesa and Simferopol. 12/2007


All briefing facilities are available within one building but not all co‐located in one briefing office ‐

ITY-ADQ

Ensure quality of aeronautical data and aeronautical information (By:07/2017 / Active)

(Outside Applicability Area) Not Applicable

Ukraine is outside of applicable area (EU area) 07/2017

Not Applicable REG (By:07/2017) Ukraine is outside of applicable area (EU area)

07/2017

Not Applicable ASP (By:07/2017) Ukraine is outside of applicable area (EU area) Rules.

07/2017

Not Applicable MIL (By:07/2017) Ukraine is outside of applicable area

‐

Not Applicable APO (By:07/2017) Ukraine is outside of applicable area (EU area)

‐


Chapter 10 - Human Resources Management and Human Factors

HUM01.1 Ensure timely availability of ATCOs (By:12/2012 / Active) Completed

Ukraine plans, attracts, selects, recruits and has a career development, in timely manner, for resources required for civil and military ATCO Profession.

12/2012


UkSATSE plans, attracts, selects, recruits and has a career development, in timely manner, for resources required for ATCO Profession. 12/2012

Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2012) All completed, planning and process is in place but without software tools.

‐

HUM02.1 Integrate Human Factors into ATM Operations (By:12/2012 / Active) Planned

This objective became obligated for Ukraine in 2011. Implementation plan for this objective was approved by director general of UkSATSE on 27/06/2012. An applicable area of this objective was changed by EUROCONTROL in October 2011. Implementation of this objective for UkSATSE will take 3 years instead of 4 years according to ESSIP. According to agreement with Agency status of implementation of this Objective for UkSATSE will be ‐Planned‐ to keep transparent approach for all ESSIP stakeholders.

12/2014

Planned

ASP (By:12/2012)

Implementation plan for this objective was approved by director general of UkSATSE on 27/06/2012. An applicable area of this objective was changed by EUROCONTROL in October 2011. Implementation of this objective for UkSATSE will take 3 years instead of 4 years according to ESSIP. In accordance with agreement with Agency status of implementation of this Objective for UkSATSE will be ‐Planned‐ to keep transparent approach for all ESSIP stakeholders.

12/2014

Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2012) Appropriate procedures are in place but not compliant with ECTR documents

‐

HUM03.1 Integrate Human Factors into the lifecycle of ATM systems (By:12/2012 / Active) No Plan

This objective became obligated for Ukraine in 2011. Investigation of current situation has started. ‐

No Plan ASP (By:12/2012) Investigation of current situation has started.

‐

Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2012) Appropriate procedures are in place but not compliant with ECTR documents

‐


Chapter 11 - CNS

11.1 Communications

COM09 Migrate ground international or regional X.25 data networks or services to the Internet Protocol (IP) (By:12/2014 / Active) Planned

SAA will provide UkSATSE the mandate to migrate to IP. SAA will inform EUROCONTROL with the dates of compliance of the National ANSPs.

12/2014

Late REG (By:12/2010)

SAA has mandated UkSATSE to migrate to IP SAA will inform EUROCONTROL with the dates of compliance of UkSATSE till the end of 2013. 01/2013

Planned ASP (By:12/2014)

IP connections between main ACC centres are underway. Development of the Plan for IP connections for outside Ukraine is in progress. 12/2014

Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2014) No X25 in military establishments.

‐

COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS (By:12/2014 / Active) Planned

Implementation has started. After Kyiv branch of UkSATSE it will be installed in the other branches . 12/2014

Planned

ASP (By:12/2014)

Deployment UkSATSEs segment of ATS AMHS service by means of implementation of the central AMHS system in Kyiv branch of UkSATSE equipped with an AFTN gateway. Gradual installation of AMHS MTA in the Dnipropetrovs‐k and Simferopol‐ branches .

12/2014


The military users will continue to be connected to the network by AFTN Gateway. ‐

COM11 Implementation of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM (By:12/2020 / Active) Planned

The implementation of VoIP on VCS of ATC centers is planned and will be included into the ANS Strategy for 2024

12/2020

Planned REG (By:12/2018)

The implementation of VoIP on VCS of ATC centers is planned and will be included into the ANS Strategy for 2024 12/2018


UkSATSE has planned the implementation of VoIP on VCS of ATC centers and include this issue into the national ATC development Plan for 2012‐2020 . 12/2020

Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2020) There is no plan to use of Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) in ATM

‐

ITY-AGDL Initial ATC air-ground data link services above FL-285 (By:02/2015 / Active)

(Outside Applicability Area) Not Applicable

Ukraine is not in the applicability area of this Multi‐National Objective. ‐

Not Applicable REG (By:02/2015) Ukraine is outside of applicable area

‐

Not Applicable ASP (By:02/2015) Ukraine is outside of applicable area

‐

Not Applicable MIL (By:-) Ukraine is outside of applicable area

‐


ITY-FMTP Apply a common flight message transfer protocol (FMTP) (By:12/2014 / Active) Planned

Transfer from OLDI to FMTP to exchange data between flight data processing systems. 12/2014

Planned REG (By:12/2014) Accreditation of FMTP will be carried out after its implementation.

12/2014

Planned

ASP (By:12/2014)

To perform migration from OLDI to FMTP to exchange information between flight data processing systems it is envisaged to upgrade the existing UkSATSE ATC systems and to use resources of both PENS and UkSATSE BTN, as a national part of PENS in order to create environment for data distribution by FMTP.

09/2013


Military ATCO uses ATC systems are not interoperable with current civil ATC Systems. ‐


11.2 Navigation

NAV03 Implementation of P-RNAV (By:12/2012 / Active) Late

Navigation database suppliers will be accredited after establishing close connection between navigation database suppliers and procedure designers. This action is part of the National PBN implementation plan which is currently being developed by the national PBN implementation team.

12/2013

Late REG (By:01/2005) The SAA has accredited a Lufthansa Systems AG as Navigation database supplier

12/2013

Late ASP (By:12/2012) P‐RNAV procedures are planned to be implemented in 2013

06/2013

Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2012) There is no plan to implement of P‐RNAV

‐

NAV10 Implement APV procedures (By:12/2016 / Active) Planned

A Plan for the implementation of APV is expected for approval by SAA. 12/2013

Late REG (By:04/2011) A Plan for the implementation of APV is expected for approval by SAA.

12/2013

Planned ASP (By:12/2016) A draft of Plan for the implementation of APV is expected by 12/2012.

12/2016

Not Applicable MIL (By:04/2015) There is no plan to Implement APV procedures

‐


11.3 Surveillance

ITY-SPI Surveillance performance and interoperability (By:01/2019 / Active)

(Outside Applicability Area) Partially Completed

Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine approved Rules of ATS surveillance services (Order N521 dated 07.11.2011) and certification requirements for ground‐based CNS facilities for civil aviation of Ukraine (Order N122 dated 25.05.2011) in accordance with ICAO and EUROCONTROL requirements.

12/2013

Partially Completed

REG (By:12/2013)

Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine approved Rules of ATS surveillance services (Order N521 dated 07.11.2011) and certification requirements for ground‐based CNS facilities for civil aviation of Ukraine (Order N122 dated 25.05.2011) in accordance with ICAO and EUROCONTROL requirements.

12/2013

Partially Completed

ASP (By:02/2015)

Procedures for the implementation of new ATS surveillance facilities include preparation of techical and operational requirements, safety assessment and staff training. UkSATSE upgraded all en‐route SSR in accordance with Ukrainian legislation, ICAO and EUROCONTROL requirements regarding surveillance performance and interoperability.

12/2013

No Plan MIL (By:12/2019) ‐

‐


Chapter 12 - Airport ATS

AOP03 Improve runway safety by preventing runway incursions (By:12/2013 / Active) Planned

The SAA of Ukraine has issued the Rules for certification of Civil Airdromes of Ukraine (Order N796 dated 25.10.2005) and Certification requirements for Civil Airdromes of Ukraine (Order N201 dated 17.03.2006) which describes procedures of safety oversight as well. The appropriate actions will be reviewed in accordance with new addition of EAPRI (Version 2.0). Kyiv (Boryspil) Airport has established a local Runway Safety Team in February 2007 (Updated Order of the DG of Boryspil Airport H‐01‐07‐260 dated 22‐06=2010).

12/2013

Planned

REG (By:12/2013)

The SAA of Ukraine has issued the Rules for certification of Civil Airdromes of Ukraine (Order N796 dated 25.10.2005) and Certification requirements for Civil Airdromes of Ukraine (Order N201 dated 17.03.2006) which describes procedures of safety oversight as well. The appropriate actions will be reviewed in accordance with new addition of EAPRI (Version 2.0).

12/2013


The recommendations of the Runway Safety Action Plan are implemented by UkSATSE 08/2012


Very specific military procedures are executed at each airfield for each flight. No requirement for a Safety Runway Team. ‐

Partially Completed

APO (By:12/2013)

Boryspil Airport has established a local Runway Safety Team in February 2007 (Updated Order of the DG of Boryspil Airport H‐01‐07‐260 dated 22‐06‐2010).The appropriate actions were reviewed in accordance with new addition of EAPRI (Version 2.0).

12/2013

12.1 Airport Kiev (Boryspil)

AOP01.2 Implement airside capacity enhancement method and best practices based on Eurocontrol capacity and efficiency implementation manual (By:12/2013 / Active) Completed

UKBB - Kiev (Outside Applicability Area)

Ukraine is outside the applicability area. However a number of actions were done in order to enhance airside capacity for forecasted traffic growth and to use best practices for the UEFA EURO 2012 at airports Boryspil, Donetsk, L‐viv, Kharkiv and Zhuliany.

12/2012


A number of actions were done in order to enhance airside capacity for forecasted traffic growth and to use best practices for the UEFA European Championship (UEFA EURO 2012) at aerodromes Kyiv (Boryspil‐), Donetsk, L‐viv, Kharkiv and Kyiv (Zhuliany).

05/2012

Completed

APO (By:12/2011)

Ukraine is outside of the applicability area. Local ACE Steering Group was established in order to enhance airside capacity for forecasted traffic growth during the UEFA EURO 2012. Increased airspace capacity for UEFA EURO‐2012 is convenient to current and nearest future airport capacity. Representatives of Boryspil will be involved in the future work of the local ACE Steering Group meetings if needed.

12/2012


AOP04.1 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level1 (By:12/2011 / Active) Not Applicable

UKBB - Kiev

(Outside Applicability Area)

Ukraine is outside of the applicability area. MOT signed Order dated 15‐04‐2004 N 311 (Radar Service use of SMR). Objective AOP04.1 will be implemented by Objective AOP4.2

12/2013

Not Applicable REG (By:12/2010)

MOT signed Order dated 15‐04‐2004 N 311 (Radar Service use of SMR). Objective AOP04.1 will be implemented by Objective AOP4.2 12/2013

Not Applicable ASP (By:12/2011) Objective AOP04.1 will be implemented by Objective AOP4.2.

12/2013

Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2010) Ukraine is outside of the applicability area.

‐

Not Applicable APO (By:12/2010) Will be implemented by Objective AOP4.2.

12/2013

AOP04.2 Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 (By:12/2017 / Active) Planned

UKBB - Kiev


Ukraine is outside of the applicability area. However, Ukraine implements the A‐SMGCS. A contract has been signed to implement MLAT system and integrate it to the existing Kyiv ATC System to control surface movements. The SMR will be installed in main airports of Ukraine

12/2013

Planned REG (By:12/2017) Ukraine will implement A‐SMGCS at UKBB and UKCC.

12/2013


MLAT system was implemented and integrated into existing ATC System at Kyiv (Borispil) TWR. New SMRs planned to be installed at UKBB and UKCC. MLAT planned to be installed at UKCC. 12/2013

Planned APO (By:12/2017) Installation of required A‐SMGCS control function equipment

12/2013


AOP05 Implement Airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) (By:01/2016 / Active) Planned

UKBB - Kiev


Ukraine in not in the applicability area. However the updated Order of the DG of Boryspil Airport H‐01‐07‐192 dated 02.03.2012 established the CDM Implementation Working Group. On the 14th Sept 2011 the Memorandum of Understanding was signed by main participants of A‐CDM. Existing implementation Plan is being updated and detailed now. According to the implementation plan testing of A‐CDM components in UKBB was started in May 2012.

01/2013

Partially Completed

ASP (By:01/2016)

Ukraine in not in the applicability area.The updated Order of the DG of Boryspil Airport H‐01‐07‐260, dated 22.06.2010 established the CDM Implementation Working Group. On the 14th Sept 2011 the Memorandum of Understanding was signed by main participants of A‐CDM. Existing implementation Plan is updated and detailed now. According to the implementation plan testing of A‐CDM in UKBB started in May 2012.

12/2013

Not Applicable MIL (By:01/2016) Ukraine in not in the applicability area.

‐

Planned

APO (By:01/2016)

Ukraine in not in the applicability area. However, on the 14th Sept 2011 the Memorandum of Understanding was signed by main participants of A‐CDM. Existing implementation Plan is being updated and detailed now. According to the implementation plan testing of A‐CDM in KBP was started in May 2012. Updated Order of the DG of Boryspil Airport H‐01‐07‐260 dated 22‐06‐2010, established the CDM Implementation Working Group.

12/2013

AOP08 Implement Airport Airside Capacity Planning Method (By:12/2015 / Active) Not Applicable

UKBB - Kiev


Ukraine is outside of the applicability area. ‐

Not Applicable ASP (By:12/2015) ‐

‐

Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2015) ‐

‐

Not Applicable APO (By:12/2015) ‐

‐

AOP09 Implement Optimised Dependent Parallel Operations (By:12/2015 / Active) Not Applicable

UKBB - Kiev


Ukraine is outside of the applicability area. UKBB implemented independent parallel operations in 2012. Other Civil aerodromes in Ukraine have single RWY. Therefore the objective is considered as "Not Applicable".

‐

Not Applicable REG (By:12/2015)

UKBB implemented independent parallel operations. Other Civil aerodromes in Ukraine have single RWY. Therefore the objective is considered as "Not Applicable". ‐

Not Applicable ASP (By:12/2015)

UKBB implemented independent parallel operations. Other Civil aerodromes in Ukraine have single RWY. Therefore the objective is considered as "Not Applicable". ‐


Chapter 13 - Environment

13.1 Airport Kiev (Boryspil)

ENV01 Implement Continuous Descent Approach (CDA) techniques for environmental improvements (By:12/2013 / Active) Planned

UKBB - Kiev


Ukraine is outside of the applicability area. Ukraine will implement CDA technique within Kyiv CTA and TMA in Approach Control Service for UKBB. Implementation plan will be drafted

12/2013


Ukraine will implement CDA technique within Kyiv CTA and TMA in Approach Control Service for UKBB. Implementation plan will be drafted 12/2013

Planned APO (By:12/2013) UKBB will take part in relevant actions of CDM Implementation Plan

12/2013

ENV02 Implement Collaborative Environmental Management (CEM) at Airports (By:12/2015 / Active) Not Applicable

UKBB - Kiev


Ukraine is outside of the applicability area. ‐

Not Applicable ASP (By:12/2013) Ukraine is outside of the applicability area.

‐

Not Applicable MIL (By:12/2013) Ukraine is outside of the applicability area.

‐

Not Applicable APO (By:12/2015) Ukraine is outside of the applicability area.

‐


LSSIP 2013-2017

PART - TRAFFIC AND ATM PERFORMANCE


Chapter 14 - Cost-efficiency

14.1 Cost-efficiency KPI/PI and target/profile for 2012-2014 In order to harmonise the metrics for monitoring cost-efficiency performance across all EUROCONTROL Member States, the cost-efficiency performance indicator was replaced in LSSIP 2011 by an indicator comparable to that applied by the SES States (EU Member States and associated States) in the context of the Performance Scheme (EU Regulation No 691/2010). For the SES States, the SES II regulation package provides for the replacement of the full cost-recovery system by “determined costs” and risk sharing for route charges from 2012 onwards. The cost-efficiency KPI at national/FAB level is the determined unit rate for en-route air navigation services, defined as the ratio between the determined costs and the forecast traffic expressed in service units. It is expressed in national currency and in real terms and provided for each year of the reference period. It is adopted as part of the national/FAB performance plans for the reference period. The performance plans for RP1 for the SES States, as well as the EC/PRB assessments and the EC acceptance letters sent to the States in July 2012 can be found on the PRB website at http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/ses-performance-scheme-reference-period-1-2012-2014. For the EUROCONTROL Member States which are not bound by these SES regulations, the full cost-recovery mechanism is applied. For them, the cost-efficiency Performance Indicator (PI) corresponds to the national en-route unit cost, defined as the ratio between the total en-route costs expressed in national currency and in real terms and the traffic expressed in service units. This PI is not associated with binding targets and will be used for monitoring purposes only. The profile that will be monitored for the period 2012-2014 is based on data provided by Ukraine in December 2011 (see 14.2) and reflected in LSSIP2011. The monitoring (14.4) is based on data provided by Ukraine in December 2012 (see 14.3). 14.2 Cost-efficiency PI profile 2012-2014 as per December 2011 data

Real en-route unit rate cost profile 2012-2014

2009 A 2010 A 2011 F 2012 F 2013 F 2014 F2014 vs

20092014 vs

2011

Total ANS en-route costs (in UAH ) 1 309 311 081 1 622 563 753 2 043 297 329 2 146 919 396 2 539 016 789 2 873 948 990 17.0% 12.0%

Inflation index (100 in 2009) 100 109 132 149 167 188 13.5% 12.5%

Total costs in real terms (in UAH2009) 1 309 311 081 1 483 147 854 1 546 499 749 1 444 380 125 1 518 374 196 1 527 705 967 3.1% -0.4%

Total SU 3 727 000 4 188 000 4 300 000 4 600 000 4 800 000 5 100 000 6.5% 5.9%

Real en-route unit cost profile (in UAH2009)

351.30 354.14 360 314 316 300 -3.1% -5.9%

% n/n-1 0.8% 4.5% -12.7% 0.7% -5.3%

Real en-route unit cost (in 2009EUR at 2009 exchange rate)

31.33 31.59 31.95 27.89 28.10 26.61 -3.2% -5.9%

% n/n-1 0.8% 4.5% -12.7% 0.7% -5.3%

Source: LSSIP2011, based on data provided by Ukraine in December 2011. Data for actual 2009 and 2010 data have been updated. 14.3. Cost-efficiency PI forecast 2012-2014 dated December 2012

Real en-route unit rate cost profile 2012-2014

2009 A 2010 A 2011 A 2012 F 2013 F 2014 F2014 vs

20092014 vs

2011

Total ANS en-route costs (in UAH ) 1 309 311 081 1 622 563 753 2 275 024 434 2 168 141 644 2 366 915 654 2 767 841 265 16.2% 6.8%

Inflation index (100 in 2009) 100 109 118 121 129 136 6.4% 4.9%

Total costs in real terms (in UAH2009) 1 309 311 081 1 483 147 854 1 925 506 495 1 799 063 125 1 828 678 047 2 030 800 576 9.2% 1.8%

Total SU 3 727 000 4 188 000 4 465 000 4 532 000 4 710 000 4 851 000 5.4% 2.8%

Real en-route unit cost (in UAH2009) 351 354 431 397 388 419 3.6% -1.0%

% n/n-1 0.8% 21.8% -7.9% -2.2% 7.8%

Real en-route unit cost (in 2009EUR at 2009 exchange rate)

31.33 31.59 38.46 35.41 34.63 37.34 3.6% -1.0%

% n/n-1 0.8% 21.8% -7.9% -2.2% 7.8%

Source: Based on data provided by Ukraine in December 2012

Data computation: PRU


14.4 Monitoring of the cost-efficiency PI for 2012-2014 The tables and graph below show Ukraine’s cost-efficiency revised forecast data for 2012-2014 from December 2012, compared to the cost-efficiency PI profile based on the data from December 2011 (LSSIP 2011). They also show the actual outturn figures for 2011.

Actual Actual Forecast

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Real En-route Unit Cost (UAH2009) 351 354 360 314 316 300

% n/n-1 0.8% 1.6% -12.7% 0.7% -5.3% -3.1%

Source: LSSIP2011, based on data provided by Ukraine in December 2011

Actual Actual Actual

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Real En-route Unit Cost (UAH2009) 351 354 431 397 388 419

% n/n-1 0.8% 21.8% -7.9% -2.2% 7.8% 3.6%

Monitoring against the profile from December 2011 ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲ ▲

Source: Based on data provided by Ukraine in December 2012

Data computation: PRU

Ukraine cost-efficiency PI profile2012-2014 from December 2011

PI profile value (Dec2011) 2014 P vs. 2009 A (yearly

average)

Ukraine cost-efficiency PI forecast2012-2014 from December 2012)

PI revised forecast (Dec2012) 2014 F vs. 2009 A (yearly

average)

Outlook for Ukraine's cost-efficiency PI based on December 2012 data monitored against the 2012-2014 profile from December 2011 forecast data

ANS en-route unit cost per SU in national currency in real terms (in UAH2009)

419388351 354 431 397

314

360

300316

0.90

1.10

1.30

1.50

1.70

1.90

2.10

2.30

2.50

Ind

ex

(2

00

9=

1.0

0)

-

50

100

150

200

250

300

350

400

450

Un

it c

os

t (a

t 2

00

9 p

ric

es

)

Unit Cost - Dec2012 351 354 431 397 388 419

En-route costs index - PI profile Dec2011 1.00 1.13 1.18 1.10 1.16 1.17

En-route costs index - Decv2012 1.00 1.13 1.47 1.37 1.40 1.55

TSU index - PI profile Dec2011 1.00 1.12 1.15 1.23 1.29 1.37

TSU index - Dec2012 1.00 1.12 1.20 1.22 1.26 1.30

Unit Cost - PI profile Dec2011 351 354 360 314 316 300

2009Actual

2010Actual

2011 Act./For.

2012 Forecast

2013 Forecast

2014 Forecast

PI Profile 2012-2014 from December 2011

Ukraine’s actual real en-route unit cost deteriorated in 2011 (increase of +21.8% compared to 2010), i.e. significantly more than the increase forecasted in December 2011 (+1.6%). This increase in the 2011 unit cost is attributable to a substantial increase in en-route costs (by +30% in real terms or +40% in nominal terms), principally due to augmented cost of capital, accounting for some 38% of the en-route cost-base in 2011. The current (December 2012) forecasts for 2012-2014 show deterioration in the real en-route unit cost compared to the profile dated December 2011, as en-route costs have been revised upwards. As a result, the forecast unit cost shows an average annual increase of +3.6% p.a. for the period 2009-2014 compared to the profile of December 2011 which foresaw a decrease of -3.1% p.a. on average for 2009-2014. It should be noted that the actual traffic for 2012 will end up lower than was forecasted and closer to the low STATFOR scenario. The expected increase in traffic due to the European Football Championship that took place in Ukraine and Poland in June 2012 did not materialise. For 2011-2014, the current (December 2012) forecasts show a real en-route unit cost reduction of -1.0 % p.a. on average.


Chapter 15 - En-route Traffic and Capacity

15.1 Evolution of traffic in Ukraine

Ukraine - Distribution (Ref. year 2011)

International Dep/Arr

30%

Domestic flights 7%

Overflights 63%

Ukraine - Annual IFR Movements

0

100.000

200.000

300.000

400.000

500.000

600.000

700.000

2008 A 2009 A 2010 A 2011 A 2012 F 2013 F 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 F

IFR

flig

hts

IFR movements - Actuals

IFR movements - Baseline forecast

IFR movements - High forecast

IFR movements - Low forecast

A = ActualF = Forecast

2009 A 2010 A 2011 A 2012 F 2013 F 2014 F 2015 F 2016 F 2017 FH 4,6% 6,3% 7,7% 7,0% 6,9% 7,6%B -6,9% 13,6% 5,7% 4,2% 5,0% 5,7% 5,6% 5,5% 5,9%L 3,8% 3,7% 4,4% 4,6% 4,5% 4,5%

ESRA B -6,6% 0,8% 3,1% -1,5% 0,0% 2,7% 2,9% 3,2% 3,0%

STATFOR Medium-Term Forecast (released September 2012)IFR flights yearly growth

Ukraine

STATFOR Medium Term Forecast (MTF September 2012): % growth 2013 compared to 2012

Domestic -1.9 % Arr/Dep 4.5 % Overflights: 6.0 % Total: 5.0 %

2012 Traffic in the Ukraine increased by 4.1% during summer 2012 (May to October inclusive), when compared to summer 2011.

2013-2017

The STATFOR medium-term forecast (MTF) predicts an average annual traffic growth between 4.2% and 6.7% throughout the planning cycle, with a baseline growth of 5.3%.


15.2 DNIPROPETROVSK ACC

15.2.1 Traffic and en-route ATFM delays 2008-2017

UKDVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800IF

R fl

igh

ts (

Da

ily A

vera

ge

)

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

En

rou

te D

ela

y (m

inu

tes

pe

r fli

gh

t)

Peak Day Traff ic 512 533 527 577 703

Summer Traff ic 415 382 443 488 522

Yearly Traff ic 364 337 382 422 442

Summer Traff ic Forecast 542 574 615 650 684

High Traff ic Forecast - Summer 551 595 637 684 735

Low Traff ic Forecast - Summer 535 564 590 625 654

Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

15.2.2 Summer 2012 performance

En-route Delay (min/flight)

Traffic Evolution 2012 Capacity Baseline Optimum All reasons Without weather

Capacity gap

+6.9% 49 (+4%) 0.1-0.2 0.0 0.0 No

Average enroute ATFM delay remained at zero, as in Summer 2011.

Planned Capacity Increase: sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments

Revised sector configurations according to traffic demand Yes

Installation of new ATM systems in UKCC APP and UKHH APP Partially achieved

New ATM system in UKCC APP is operational ATM system in UKHH APP is under installation

Implementation of P-RNAV procedures in TMA airspace Yes

Re-definition of sector configurations (DFL change) Yes There was created new sector configuration (it is used as default sector configuration)

Maximum configuration: 4 sectors Yes

Summer 2012 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was measured using ACCESS. The peak 1 hour demand was 38 flights, indicating that the ACC offered sufficient capacity to meet demand with spare capacity remaining in the system. The peak 3 hour demand was 33. A maximum configuration of 4 sectors was declared open.


15.2.3 Planning Period 2013-2017 – Summer

The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.

The 2013-2017 summer capacity profile and delay breakdown has been derived according to the following parameters: 2013-2014: capacity requirement profiles based on the delay breakdown per ACC (See 15.7) 2015-2017: breakdown of a European delay target of 0.7 min/flight for the Summer season,

corresponding to the 2014 yearly target of 0.5 minute average ATFM enroute delay per flight.

2013 2014 2015 2016 20170,19 0,29 0,19 0,15 0,12

Summer en-route ATFM delay breakdown

UKDVCTA

H 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 51 4% 52 2%Ref. 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 50 2%

L 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 49 0%C/R 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 49 0% 50 2%

2016 2017

UKDV 49

Capacity Profiles

ACC2012

baseline Profiles (hourly movements and % increase over 2012)

2013 2014 2015

Capacity Plan

Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Revised sector configurations, ATFCM measures development (strategic ATFCM)

Revised opening schemes, implementation of ATFCM measures according to traffic demand (pre tactical and tactical ATFCM)

ATM system upgrades due to implementation of ESSIP FCM01 and

FCM03 objectives

Measures planned

Modernization and installation of ATM systems in UKDV ACC (July 2013)

and UKHH APP (training and transition periods – from March to May 2013)

correspondently

Significant events

Max sectors 4 4 4 4 4

Capacity increase Sufficient capacity to meet demand

Reference profile 0% 0% 0% 0% 2%

Additional information


UKDVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

Cap

acit

y p

rofi

le (

mo

vem

ents

per

ho

ur)

2013-2017 Reference Capacity Profile 49 49 49 49 50

Capacity Profile - Current Routes 49 49 49 49 50

Capacity Profile - High 49 49 49 51 52

Capacity Profile - Low 49 49 49 49 49

Capacity Baseline 47 49

2013 - 2017 Plan 49 49 49 51 52

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

15.3 KYIV ACC


UKBVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

0

200

400

600

800

1000

1200

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rag

e)

0.0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

En

rou

te D

ela

y (m

inu

tes

pe

r fli

gh

t)

Peak Day Traff ic 743 721 789 876 1099

Summer Traff ic 622 549 630 713 754

Yearly Traff ic 550 498 549 626 650




Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

2013-2017 Planning Period Outlook No problems are foreseen for Dnipropetrovs’k ACC during the current planning cycle.





Capacity gap

+5.7% 72 (0%) 0.04 0.0 0.0 No

Average enroute ATFM delay decreased from 0.1 min per flight in 2011 to zero min per flight in 2012

Planned Capacity Increase: Sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments Revised sector configurations according to traffic demand Yes

Modernization of ATM system Yes

Implementation of P-RNAV procedures in UKBV TMA airspace

Yes

Re-sectorisation of TMA airspace (according to SOIR procedure in UKBB)

Yes

Maximum configuration: 6 sectors Yes There were created 7 sector configurations. They were used during EURO2012 special

Summer 2012 performance assessment The ACC capacity baseline was assessed to be at the same level as in Summer 2011. The peak 1 hour demand was 57 flights, indicating that the ACC offered sufficient capacity to meet demand with spare capacity remaining in the system. The peak 3 hour demand was 51 flights. During the measured period a 7 sector maximum configuration was declared open.

15.3.3 Planning Period 2013-2017




2013 2014 2015 2016 20170,12 0,12 0,11 0,1 0,11


UKBVCTA

H 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 74 3% 80 8%Ref. 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 74 3%

L 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 73 1%C/R 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 74 3%

UKBV 72

Capacity Profiles

ACC2012


2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Capacity Plan

Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017


Revised opening schemes, implementation of ATFCM measures according to traffic demand (pre tactical and tactical ATFCM) Measures

planned ATM system upgrades due to implementation

of ESSIP FCM01, FCM03 and AOP05 objectives

Significant events



Capacity increase

Sufficient capacity to meet demand

Reference profile

0% 0% 0% 0% 3%


UKBVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios

68

70

72

74

76

78

80

82

Cap

acit

y p

rofi

le (

mo

vem

ents

per

ho

ur)






2013 - 2017 Plan 72 72 72 74 80

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

2013-2017 Planning Period Outlook No problems are foreseen for Kyiv ACC during the current planning cycle.


15.4 LVIV ACC


UKLVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rag

e)

0,0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

0,6

0,7

0,8

0,9

1,0

En

rou

te D

ela

y (m

inu

tes

pe

r fli

gh

t)

Peak Day Traff ic 643 616 644 721 757

Summer Traff ic 488 461 514 546 554

Yearly Traff ic 429 419 451 486 488




Summer enroute delay (all causes) 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0 0,0

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017




Capacity gap

+1.6% 72 (0%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 No


Planned Capacity Increase: Sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments Revised sector configurations according to traffic demand Yes

Modernization of ATM system No In progress

Implementation of P-RNAV procedures in TMA airspace Yes



15.4.3 Planning Period 2013-2017 – Summer




2013 2014 2015 2016 20170,00 0,00 0,01 0,01 0,02


UKLVCTA


H 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0%Ref. 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0%

L 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0%C/R 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0% 72 0%

2016 2017

UKLV 72

Capacity Profiles

ACC2012


2013 2014 2015

Capacity Plan

Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017



Installation of new ATM system (training and transition periods – from August to October 2013)

Measures planned

ATM system upgrades due to implementation of ESSIP FCM01 and FCM03 objectives

Significant events


Capacity increase


Reference profile

0% 0% 0% 0% 0%


UKLVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Ca

pac

ity

pro

file

(m

ove

me

nts

pe

r h

ou

r)






2013 - 2017 Plan 72 72 72 72 72

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

2013-2017 Planning Period Outlook No problems are foreseen for Lviv ACC during the current planning cycle.


15.5 ODESA ACC


UKOVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rag

e)

0,0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

0,6

0,7

0,8

0,9

1,0

En

rou

te D

ela

y (m

inu

tes

pe

r fli

gh

t)

Peak Day Traff ic 334 329 416 450 480

Summer Traff ic 256 247 307 324 332

Yearly Traff ic 215 208 250 266 270





2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017




Capacity gap

+ 2.5% 59 (0%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 No


Planned Capacity Increase: Sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments

Revised sector configurations according to traffic demand Yes Existing configurations and default opening schemes were sufficient to meet the demand

Modernization of ATM system Yes



15.5.3 Planning Period 2013-2017 - Summer




2013 2014 2015 2016 20170,00 0,00 0,00 0,00 0,00


UKOVCTA


H 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0%Ref. 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0%

L 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0%C/R 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0% 59 0%

2016 2017

UKOV 59

Capacity Profiles

ACC2012


2013 2014 2015

Capacity Plan

Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017




Measures planned

Implementation of P-RNAV in TMA

Significant events


Capacity increase


Reference profile

0% 0% 0% 0% 0%


UKOVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

Ca

pac

ity

pro

file

(m

ove

me

nts

pe

r h

ou

r)






2013 - 2017 Plan 59 59 59 59 59

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

2013-2017 Planning Period Outlook No problems are foreseen for Odesa ACC during the current planning cycle.


15.6 SIMFEROPOL ACC


UKFVACC - Traffic and en-route ATFM delays

0

100

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

IFR

flig

hts

(D

aily

Ave

rag

e)

0,0

0,1

0,2

0,3

0,4

0,5

0,6

0,7

0,8

0,9

1,0

En

rou

te D

ela

y (m

inu

tes

pe

r fli

gh

t)

Peak Day Traff ic 682 668 804 758 760

Summer Traff ic 537 526 648 616 618

Yearly Traff ic 481 463 559 544 536





2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017




Capacity gap

+0.4% 75 (0%) 0.0 0.0 0.0 No Average enroute ATFM delay remained at zero, as in Summer 2011.

Planned Capacity Increase: Sufficient to meet demand Achieved Comments

Revised sector configurations according to traffic demand Yes Existing configurations and default opening schemes were sufficient to meet the demand



15.6.3 Planning Period 2013-2017 - Summer




2013 2014 2015 2016 20170,01 0,02 0,00 0,00 0,00


UKFVCTA


H 75 0% 75 0% 75 0% 75 0% 75 0%Ref. 75 0% 75 0% 75 0% 75 0% 75 0%

L 75 0% 75 0% 75 0% 75 0% 75 0%C/R 75 0% 75 0% 75 0% 75 0% 76 1%

UKFV 75

Capacity Profiles

ACC2012


2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

Capacity Plan

Year 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017




Measures planned

Implementation of P-RNAV in TMA

Significant events

ATFCM event – Winter Olympic Games in Sochi

(Russian Federation)


Capacity increase


Reference profile

0% 0% 0% 0% 0%


UKFVCTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

Ca

pac

ity

pro

file

(m

ove

me

nts

pe

r h

ou

r)






2013 - 2017 Plan 75 75 75 75 75

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

2013-2017 Planning Period Outlook No problems are foreseen for Simferopol ACC during the current planning cycle.


15.7 Reference values of the breakdown of the European capacity/delay target

In accordance with the statement of Ukraine on the 36th Session of EUROCONTROL Provisional Council the RP1 should be considered as a transitional period for Ukraine, focusing on the monitoring of the Performance Indicators during RP1 with the intention of target setting in RP2. The planning period 2013-2017 includes the following en-route delay targets, as adopted by the EUROCONTROL Provisional Council at its 35th Session, in May 2011:

2014 : 0.5 minutes average en-route ATFM delay per flight for the full year 2013 : 0.6 minutes average en-route ATFM delay per flight for the full year

The en-route delay target was broken down at ANSP and ACC level by EUROCONTROL. To take into account the seasonality of traffic and delays, Summer and Winter seasons were assessed separately: 2013: 0.85 min/flight Summer season – 0.3 min/flight Winter season 2014: 0.7 min/flight Summer season – 0.3 min/flight Winter season

The capacity requirement profile and delay breakdown have been calculated for all ECAC states.

15.7.1 DNIPROPETROVSK ACC

The figure below presents: 2006-2012* - yearly en-route delay performance *2012 up to end of October

2012-2014 - yearly en-route delay breakdown that has been assessed for each ACC to meet the Eurocontrol Provisional Council target.

UKDVACC

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.01

0.00 0.00

0.09

0.12

0.19

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Del

ay (

min

) p

er f

ligh

t

Yearly delay per flight (all reasons)

Delay breakdown


15.7.2 KYIV ACC



UKBVACC

0.00 0.00 0.000.02

0.08

0.00 0.00

0.02

0.07 0.08

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Del

ay (

min

) p

er f

ligh

t


Delay breakdown

15.7.3 LVIV ACC



UKLVACC

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.02

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Del

ay (

min

) p

er f

ligh

t


Delay breakdown


15.7.4 ODESA ACC



UKOVACC

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00

0.02

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.000.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Del

ay (

min

) p

er f

ligh

t


Delay breakdown

15.7.5 SIMFEROPOL ACC




UKFVACC

0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01 0.010.02

0.00

0.10

0.20

0.30

0.40

0.50

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

Del

ay (

min

) p

er f

ligh

t


Delay breakdown

More information on capacity planning is available at the EUROCONTROL website:

http://www.eurocontrol.int/sites/default/files/content/documents/nm/airspace/airspace-capacity-planning-guidance-assessement-2007.pdf


Chapter 16 - Airport Traffic and Capacity

16.1 State Enterprise “Boryspil International Airport” (UKBB)

16.1.1 Airport traffic

The graph below shows traffic development from 2009 to actual and traffic forecast until 2017 (Departures + Arrivals).

IFR movements yearly growth

Airport Scenario 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

UKBB Actual [STATFOR]

-10.7% 11.7% 9.98%

UKBB Base [STATFOR]

5.81% 2.32% 6.16% 6.04% 5.65% 5.27%

UKBB High [STATFOR]

6.27% 4.01% 8.29% 7.58% 7.16% 6.96%

UKBB Low [STATFOR]

5.46% 1.17% 4.9% 5.09% 4.7% 4.22%

Sources: STATFOR MTF September 2012

16.1.2 Airport Delays and Capacity

16.1.2.1 Airport Delays

Airport Boryspil is NOT identified as being critical and potentially having an effect upon the network in terms of ATFCM delays therefore no delay information is indicated.

16.1.2.2 Airport Current Declared Capacity

Declared capacity for CFMU regulation purposes

Default Hourly Arrival Declared Capacity: 48 movements.

Maximum declared capacity

State Enterprise International Airport “Boryspil” is the busiest Ukrainian airport and has on average 275 movements per day (12 month 2011). At peak hour (12:00 – 15:00) does not exceed 45 movements per hour.


Airport Boryspil declared Capacity

Terminal B

Domestic Flights

International Flights Terminal F Terminal D

Total capacity

flights/passengers 14/1250 21/2300 20/2000 36/6000

Flight Number

Arrival 8 10 10 20

Departure 6 11 10 16

Passengers Number

Arrival 600 1100 1000 3000

Departure 650 1200 1000 3000

Kiev “Boryspil” Airport maximum declared capacity is 92 flights/h.

Capacities for different runway configurations

Runway Configuration: Max Arrivals : Max Departures: Global : Optimum:

18L36R/18R36L RWY configuration

48 44 92 65

Additional Information:

The standard method of operations (optimum conditions) for Kiev “Boryspil” Airport is:

(AIP Ukraine UKBB AD 2-15.)

Low visibility procedures during Category ІІ or ІІІА ICAO operations.

Criteria for the initiation and termination of LVP:

The procedure shall be applied if RVR is less then 600 meters.

Pilots will be informed about the beginning of application of the procedures by ATIS or ATC controller. RWY 36R is used for CAT ІІ or ІІІА operations (DH Category ІІІ А is less than 30 meters or without DH, RVR less 350 meters but is not less 200 meters).


16.1.3 Airport planned development

The new international terminal D building construction is finished and started operations in summer season 2012. It will increase the airport capacity up to 350-375 movements per day, 92 flights and 11550 passengers per hour.

Overall Action Plan 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

AOP01.2 - Implement airside capacity enhancement method and best practices based on EUROCONTROL capacity and efficiency implementation manual

Completed

Completed

Completed

Completed

AOP03 - Improve runway safety by preventing runwayincursions

Planned to be finished

AOP04.1 - Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level I *

Progress Planned to be finished

AOP04.2 - Implement Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A-SMGCS) Level 2 **

Progress Planned to be finished

AOP05 - Implement airport Collaborative Decision Making (CDM) ***

Progress Planned to

be finished

AOP08 - Implement Airport Airside Capacity PlanningMethod

N/A N/A N/A N/A

Additional local actions

(Resulting) Global Maximum Capacity Objective / Forecast

275 ≈+10% ≈+10% ≈+10%

Yearly planned capacity increase 275 ≈+10% ≈+10% ≈+10%

Expected delays reduction (indicate with a sign “=”, “+” the expectation in terms of delays reduction compared to the previous year while considering the traffic capacity forecast and the action plan

= = = =

Legend:

AOP01.2 - Ukraine is not in the applicability area but increased airspace capacity for UEFA EURO 2012 was required and therefore current and nearest future airport capacity was improved.

* Ukraine is not in the applicability area but Order of MoT 15/04/2004 N 311 (Radar Service use of SMR) was signed. ** Ukraine is not in the applicability area, however, Ukraine is participating in A-SMGCS. A contract has been signed to implement MLAT system and integrate it to the existing Kiev ATC System to control surface movements. The SMR will be installed in main airports of Ukraine

***Ukraine is not in the applicability area however updated Order of the DG of Boryspil Airport H-01-07-192 dated 02/03/2012 established CDM Implementation Working Group. On the 14th Sept 2011 the Memorandum of Understanding was signed by main participants of A-CDM. Existing implementation Plan is being updated and detailed now. According to the implementation plan, testing of A-CDM in KBP started in May 2012. According to the implementation plan, local procedures were defined and agreed.

LSSIP 2013-2017 Ukraine Annexes - 1 Released Issue

Annexes

Annex A – Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process

LSSIP Co-ordination (and Part I – State Context)

LSSIP Focal Point for Ukraine UkSATSE Ruslan HUTSAN

LSSIP Focal Point for SAAU SAAU Oleg SHUPIK

LSSIP Focal Point for MoD Ukrainian Air Force Command Vasyl NIKIFOROV

LSSIP Focal Point for UkSATSE ANSP (UkSATSE) Oleksii PESTERNIKOV

LSSIP Focal Point for Kyiv Boryspil Airport

Kyiv Boryspil Airport Andrii PRUD

LSSIP Contact Person for Ukraine EUROCONTROL Ana Paula FRANGOLHO

Part - ESSIP Objective Implementation

ESSIP Objective

EUROCONTROL Objective Owners EUROCONTROL LSSIP Advisor

National Specialist(s)

AOM13.1 DNM: R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI

DSS: E. REUBER

O. CIOARA REG- Oleg SHUPIK (SAAU)

ASP - Serhii PEREVEZENTSEV

(UkSATSE)

MIL - Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)

AOM19 DNM: G. ACAMPORA, O. MROWICKI O. CIOARA ASP - Serhii PEREVEZENTSEV

(UkSATSE)

MIL- Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)

AOM20 DNM: R. BUCUROIU, C. BRAIN O. CIOARA ASP - Serhii PEREVEZENTSEV

(UkSATSE)

MIL- Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)

AOP01.2 DNM: P. ADAMSON, M. BIRENHEIDE DSS: P. JOPPART

P. VRANJKOVIC APO- Andrii PRUD (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)

ASP -Volodymyr CHALYK

(UkSATSE)

AOP03 DNM: A. LICU DSS: P. JOPPART

P. VRANJKOVIC REG -Gregoriy GOLODNYAK (SAA)

AOP - Andrii PRUD (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)

ASP- Volodymyr CHALYK

(UkSATSE)

AOP04.1 DNM: P. ADAMSON DSS: P. JOPPART

P. VRANJKOVIC REG - Gregoriy GOLODNYAK (SAA)


ASP -Volodymyr CHALYK

(UkSATSE)

MIL - Serhii ZAKHARCHUK (MoD)

AOP04.2 DNM: P. ADAMSON DSS: P. JOPPART



ASP - Volodymyr CHALYK

(UkSATSE)

AOP05 DNM: P. ADAMSON, D. BOOTH DSS: P. JOPPART

P. VRANJKOVIC AOP - Andrii PRUD (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)


(UkSATSE)


AOP08 DNM: P. ADAMSON, M. BIRENHEIDE DSS: P. JOPPART

P. VRANJKOVIC AOP - Andrii PRUD (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)


(UkSATSE)


ESSIP Objective




AOP09 DNM: P. ADAMSON DSS: P. JOPPART


AOP – Andrii PRUD (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)

ASP – Volodymyr CHALYK

(UkSATSE)

ATC02.2 DSR: B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT REG – Bogdan Suveika (SAAU)


(UkSATSE)

ATC02.5 DSR: B. BAKKER, S. DROZDOWSKI I. FEIJT REG - Bogdan Suveika (SAAU)


(UkSATSE)




(UkSATSE)



ASP – Serhii PEREVEZENTSEV

(UkSATSE)


ATC07.1 / L. DELL’ORTO ASP - Serhii PEREVEZENTSEV

(UkSATSE)

ATC12 / L. DELL’ORTO REG – Bogdan Suveika (SAAU)


(UkSATSE)

ATC15 / L. DELL’ORTO REG - Bogdan Suveika (SAAU)

ASP- Serhii PEREVEZENTSEV

(UkSATSE)

ATC16 DSR: S. DROZDOWSKI L. DELL’ORTO REG- Bogdan Suveika (SAAU)


(UkSATSE)

ATC17 / L. DELL’ORTO REG - Bogdan Suveika (SAAU)


(UkSATSE)

COM09 DNM: B. GASZTYCH, J. POUZET O. ALFARO REG-

ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO

(UkSATSE)


COM10 DNM: B. GASZTYCH, J. POUZET A. KOKONA ASP - Oleksandr IVANENKO

(UkSATSE)


COM11 DNM: B. GASZTYCH, J. POUZET A. KOKONA REG- Oleg CHORNYI (SAAU)


(UkSATSE)


ENV01 DNM: P. ADAMSON, B. DAY DSS: S. MAHONY, A. WATT

B. HILL APO – Andrii PRUD (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)


(UkSATSE)

ENV02 DSS: S. MAHONY, A. WATT B. HILL APO – Andrii PRUD (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)



ESSIP Objective



(UkSATSE)


FCM01 DNM: J. KOOLEN O. CIOARA ASP - Volodymyr CHALYK

(UkSATSE)


FCM03 DNM: J. KOOLEN, G. MATEUCA O. CIOARA ASP Volodymyr CHALYK

(UkSATSE)


GEN01 DNM: A. LICU I. FEIJT REG - Oleg SHUPIK (SAAU)


(UkSATSE)


HUM01.1 DNM: M. DAMITZ B. HILL ASP - Borys MORSKYI (UkSATSE)


HUM02.1 DNM: A. LICU B. HILL ASP - Borys MORSKYI (UkSATSE)


HUM03.1 DNM: A. LICU B. HILL ASP - Borys MORSKYI (UkSATSE)


INF04

DNM: G. LIEGEOIS A-P. FRANGOLHO ASP ‐ Viktor NASTASIENKO (UkSATSE)


ITY-ADQ DSS: M. UNTERREINER A-P. FRANGOLHO REG – Vasiliy KAMASHAEV (SAAU)

ASP -Oleksandr IVANENKO

(UkSATSE)

MIL – Serhii ZAKHARCHUK (MoD)

APO - Andrii PRUD (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)

ITY-AGDL / A. KOKONA REG – Oleg CHORNYI (SAAU)


(UkSATSE)


ITY-COTR / L. DELL’ORTO REG – Oleg CHORNYI (SAAU)


(UkSATSE)


ITY-FMTP DNM: B. GASZTYCH, J. POUZET O. ALFARO REG – Oleg CHORNYI (SAAU)


(UkSATSE)


ITY-SPI DNM: R. STEWART DSS: M. BORELY

A-P. FRANGOLHO REG – Oleg CHORNYI (SAAU)


(UkSATSE)

ITY- AGVCS DSR: F. PAVLICEVIC REG - Oleg SHUPIK (SAAU)


(UkSATSE)


NAV03 DSR: R. FARNWORTH, F. PAVLICEVIC A. KOKONA REG - Oleg SHUPIK (SAAU)


(UkSATSE)


NAV10 DNM: A. LICU A. KOKONA REG – Vasiliy KAMASHAEV (SAAU)

ASP -Oleksandr IVANENKO


ESSIP Objective



(UkSATSE)

MIL – Hennadii SHELUDKO (MoD)

APO - Andrii PRUD (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)

SAF04 DNM: A. LICU I. FEIJT REG - Sergij BORZENETS (SAAU)

ASP - Vitaliy BEZMAL (UkSATSE)

(UkSATSE)


SAF05 DNM: A. LICU I. FEIJT REG - Sergij BORZENETS (SAAU)


(UkSATSE)

SAF10 DNM: R. BUCUROIU, O. MROWICKI

DSS: E. REUBER

I. FEIJT REG - Sergij BORZENETS (SAAU)


(UkSATSE)


SRC-AUDI DSS: M. DEBOECK - REG -Sergij BORZENETS (SAAU)


SRC-CHNG DSS: M. DEBOECK - REG - Sergij BORZENETS (SAAU)


SRC-OVCA DSS: M. DEBOECK - REG - Sergij BORZENETS (SAAU)


SRC-RLMK DSS: M. DEBOECK - REG - Sergij BORZENETS (SAAU)


SRC-SLRD DSS: M. DEBOECK - REG - Sergij BORZENETS (SAAU)


Part - Traffic and ATM Performance

Area EUROCONTROL Expert EUROCONTROL LSSIP Advisor


Traffic DNM: D. MARSH A-P. FRANGOLHO Andrii KHODKOV (UkSATSE)

En-route Capacity DNM: R. BUCUROIU S. VINCENT

A-P. FRANGOLHO Volodymyr CHALYK (UkSATSE)

Airport Capacity DNM: M.C. MEYER A-P. FRANGOLHO

Andrii PRUD (Kyiv Boryspil Airport)

Cost-efficiency DSS: C. CAPART A-P. FRANGOLHO Igor BLINOV (UkSATSE)


Annex B – National Stakeholders Organisation Charts

1. The Structure of the SAAU (the main function areas)

Chairman

Senior Deputy Chairman

Legal and Administrative

Financial and Economical Directorate

Deputy Chairman

Flight Operations Standards Department

Aircraft Continuing Airworthiness Department

Air Navigation and Internal Relations

Directorate Aircraft Type Certification Department

Inspection Department

Aviation Security Department

Airworthiness and Type Certification

Directorate

Flight Standards Directorate

Air Transportation and Airports Directorate


2. The organisation chart of UkSATSE:

UkSATSE comprises:

- The UkSATSE Head Office (Air Navigation, CNS, Administration, Economics and Finance, Engineering Departments) is located at airport Kyiv (Boryspil’);

- Seven regional branches of UkSATSE (RB of UkSATSE) located at airports: Simferopol’, Kyiv (Boryspil’), Dnipropetrovs’k, L’viv, Odesa, Donets’k and Kharkiv .

- “UkSATSE” airline: Four aircrafts performing calibration checks of navigation equipment for UkSATSE, as well as for other entities in neighbouring States (situated at airport Simferopol);

- UKRAEROCENTRE: Ukrainian Airspace Management and Planning Centre – the Head Unit of the Integrated Civil-Military ATM System (situated in RB of UkSATSE “Kyivcentraero”);

- AIS: Aeronautical Information Services of UkSATSE is located at airport Kyiv (Boryspil’); - TCC of UkSATSE: Training and Certification Centre of UkSATSE for air traffic controllers and

maintenance technicians (situated near UkSATSE Head office).

Address of UkSATSE Head office:

Airport, Boryspil’, Kyiv region, 08307, Ukraine

Telephone: (+38 044) 235 21 10

Fax: (+38 044) 281 84 84

AFTN: UKKRDUXX

Email: [email protected]

Website: www.uksatse.ua


3. The organisation chart of Air Navigation Service Department of UkSATSE


Annex C – Glossary of Abbreviations

ESRA EUROCONTROL Statistical Reference Area

IAIP Integrated Aeronautical Information Package

MoD Ministry of Defence of Ukraine

MoTC Ministry of Transport and Communications of Ukraine

MoI Ministry of Infrastructure of Ukraine

RAIM Regional Aeronautical Information Management

RSOO Regional Safety Oversight Organization

SAAU State Aviation Administration of Ukraine

UKRAEROCENTER Ukrainian Airspace Management and Planning Centre

UkSATSE Ukrainian State Air Traffic Service Enterprise

USSR Union of Soviet Socialist Republics