local government energy audit program energy … · 7/15/2010  · ecm #7 melink kitchen exhaust...

102
LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM: ENERGY AUDIT REPORT PREPARED FOR: PINE HILL PUBLIC SCHOOLS OVERBROOK HIGH SCHOOL 1200 TURNERVILLE ROAD PINE HILL, NJ 08021 ATTN: MR. THOMAS O’ DONNELL TOWNSHIP ADMINISTRATOR PREPARED BY: CONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP 520 S. BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NJ 08043 TELEPHONE: (856) 427-0200 FACSIMILE: (856) 427-6529 WWW.CEG-INC.NET CEG CONTACT: JESSE OHM, PE, LEED AP LEAD MECHANICAL ENGINEER EMAIL: JOHM@CEG-INC.NET REPORT ISSUANCE: FINAL, JULY 15, 2010 PROJECT NO: 9C10005

Upload: others

Post on 04-Jun-2020

0 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM: ENERGY AUDIT REPORT

PREPARED FOR: PINE HILL PUBLIC SCHOOLS OVERBROOK HIGH SCHOOL

1200 TURNERVILLE ROAD PINE HILL, NJ 08021 ATTN: MR. THOMAS O’ DONNELL TOWNSHIP ADMINISTRATOR

PREPARED BY: CONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP

520 S. BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NJ 08043 TELEPHONE: (856) 427-0200 FACSIMILE: (856) 427-6529 WWW.CEG-INC.NET

CEG CONTACT: JESSE OHM, PE, LEED AP

LEAD MECHANICAL ENGINEER EMAIL: [email protected]

REPORT ISSUANCE: FINAL, JULY 15, 2010

PROJECT NO: 9C10005

Page 2: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 1 of 55

TABLE OF CONTENTS

I.  EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ................................................................................................. 3 

II.  INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 9 

III.  METHOD OF ANALYSIS................................................................................................ 10 

IV.  HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST ............................................................... 12 

A. ENERGY USAGE / TARIFFS .................................................................................................. 12 B. ENERGY USE INDEX (EUI) .................................................................................................. 17 C. EPA ENERGY BENCHMARKING SYSTEM ............................................................................. 19

V.  FACILITY DESCRIPTION .............................................................................................. 20 

VI.  MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST ............................................................................................ 23 

VII.  ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES ..................................................................... 24 

VIII.  RENEWABLE/DISTRIBUTED ENERGY MEASURES ................................................ 46 

IX.  ENERGY PURCHASING AND PROCUREMENT STRATEGY .................................. 49 

X.  INSTALLATION FUNDING OPTIONS.......................................................................... 52 

XI.  ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS ......................................................................... 54 

XII.  ENERGY AUDIT ASSUMPTIONS ................................................................................. 55 

Appendix A – ECM Cost & Savings Breakdown

Appendix B – New Jersey Smart Start® Program Incentives

Appendix C – Portfolio Manager “Statement of Energy Performance”

Appendix D – Major Equipment List

Appendix E – Investment Grade Lighting Audit

Appendix F – Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculations

Appendix G – Energy Conservation Measure Calculation Values

Appendix H – Kitchen Exhaust Calculations

Page 3: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 2 of 55

REPORT DISCLAIMER

The information contained within this report, including any attachment(s), is intended solely for use by the named addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, or a person designated as responsible for delivering such messages to the intended recipient, you are not authorized to disclose, copy, distribute or retain this report, in whole or in part, without written authorization from Concord Engineering Group, Inc., 520 S. Burnt Mill Road, Voorhees, NJ 08043.

This report may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you have received this report in error, please notify the sender immediately. Thank you for your anticipated cooperation.

Page 4: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 3 of 55

I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

This report presents the findings of the energy audit conducted for:

Overbrook High School 1200 Turnerville Road Pine Hill NJ, 08021 Facility Contact Person: Thomas O ‘Donnell This audit is performed in connection with the New Jersey Clean Energy - Local Government Energy Audit Program. The energy audit is conducted to promote the mission of the office of Clean Energy, which is to use innovation and technology to solve energy and environmental problems in a way that improves the State’s economy. This can be achieved through the wiser and more efficient use of energy. The annual energy costs at this facility are as follows: The potential annual energy cost savings for each energy conservation measure (ECM) and renewable energy measure (REM) are shown below in Table 1. Be aware that the ECM’s and REM’s are not additive because of the interrelation of some of the measures. This audit is consistent with an ASHRAE level 2 audit. The cost and savings for each measure is ± 20%. The evaluations are based on engineering estimations and industry standard calculation methods. More detailed analyses would require engineering simulation models, hard equipment specifications, and contractor bid pricing.

Electricity $ 236,346

Nat Gas $ 133,630

Total $ 369,976

Page 5: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 4 of 55

Table 1 Financial Summary Table

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

ECM #1 Computer Monitor Replacement $21,200 $9,488 2.2 123.8%

ECM #2 Condensing Boiler Installation $560,873 $16,908 33.2 -9.6%

ECM #3 Pump VFD Retrofit $74,988 $16,484 4.5 229.7%

ECM #4 AC Rooftop Unit Replacement $22,825 $1,253 18.2 -17.7%

ECM #5 Lighting Upgrade $12,350 $6,244 2.0 658.4%

ECM #6 Lighting Occupancy Sensors / Daylight Sensors $5,990 $1,277 4.7 219.8%

ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6%

REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Notes:

ANNUAL SAVINGS

SIMPLE PAYBACK

(Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME ROI

A. Cost takes into consideration applicable NJ Smart StartTM incentives.B. Savings takes into consideration applicable maintenance savings.

ANNUAL SAVINGSB

NET INSTALLATION

COSTA

RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

ECM NO. DESCRIPTIONNET

INSTALLATION COST

ECM NO.ECM NO. DESCRIPTION SIMPLE PAYBACK (Yrs)

SIMPLE LIFETIME ROI

The estimated demand and energy savings for each ECM and REM is shown below in Table 2. The descriptions in this table correspond to the ECM’s and REM’s listed in Table 1.

Page 6: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 5 of 55

Table 2 Estimated Energy Savings Summary Table

ECM #1 Computer Monitor Replacement 10.6 64109.0 0

ECM #2 Condensing Boiler Installation 0 0 10310.0

ECM #3 Pump VFD Retrofit 0 110764.0 0

ECM #4 AC Rooftop Unit Replacement 7.1 8468.0 0

ECM #5 Lighting Upgrade 16.0 42188.0 0

ECM #6 Lighting Occupancy Sensors / Daylight Sensors 2.5 8630.0 0

ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust 0 6590.0 3068.0

REM #1 211.37 KW PV System 211.4 258221.0 0

Notes:

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

NATURAL GAS (THERMS)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)

A. Demand Savings for Renewable Energy Measures fluctuate with the seasons and are estimated based on the demand the Photovoltaic System will produce.

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION

ECM NO. DESCRIPTION

ANNUAL UTILITY REDUCTION

RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES (REM's)

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES (ECM's)

ELECTRIC DEMAND

(KW)

ELECTRIC CONSUMPTION

(KWH)

Page 7: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 6 of 55

Concord Engineering Group (CEG) recommends proceeding with the implementation of all ECM’s that provide a calculated simple payback at or under ten (10) years. The following Energy Conservation Measures are recommended for the facility. See below for the recommended ECM summaries:

• ECM #1: Computer Monitor Replacement

• ECM #3: Install Pump VFD’s

• ECM #5: Lighting Upgrade

• ECM #6: Lighting Occupancy Sensors & Daylight Sensors

• ECM #7: Melink Kitchen Exhaust Controls

ECM #1 – Computer Monitor Replacement:

Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) monitors are used throughout the school district. These monitors use approximately three times more energy than a new flat panel LCD monitor. Since the majority of all computer monitors were noted to be on and in screen saver mode, it was determined that the hours of operation for this plug in load are almost continuous. The energy savings from replacing the existing CRT monitors with LCD monitors will pay for the new monitors in approximately two years saving $9,488 annually. It is important to realize that these savings are comparing the energy savings based on the existing operating hours both before and after the retrofit, however even further savings could be seen if computers and monitors were turned off for all hours they are not in use. See the additional recommendations below.

ECM #4 – Install Pump VFD’s:

VFDs allow HVAC system pumps to operate at reduced speeds when the call for heating is below the peak. The hours of operation that the building load is below peak are considerable, which reduces pump energy for the majority of the time. The High School includes large boiler water pumps that can take advantage of this control. This ECM also includes the replacement of the existing motors with premium efficiency motors. The savings as a result of the reduction in pumping energy is approximately $16,484 annually, which has a simple pay back of 4.5 years. This ECM is highly recommended for this facility.

ECM #6 – Lighting Upgrade:

The lighting upgrade potential at Overbrook High School consists of incandescent bulbs installed in the majority of the bathrooms, closets, and other misc. rooms throughout the school. The gymnasium utilizes old style metal halide fixtures. These fixtures have direct replacements that save considerable energy. The lighting retrofit includes compact fluorescent bulb replacements for the incandescent fixtures and new high bay T-5 high output fluorescent fixtures to replace the metal halide fixtures. Advantages include extended life, instant lamp start and superior light quality, making this ECM both financially beneficial and aesthetically / operationally beneficial.

Page 8: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 7 of 55

This ECM has a simple payback of 2.0 years making it the fastest simple payback of all ECMs available.

ECM #6 – Lighting Occupancy Sensors / Daylight Sensors:

Lighting controls provide a simple and effective solution to the problem of lights being unnecessarily left on. Occupancy sensors provide a very fast payback since the installation costs are minimal per control device. Daylight Sensors provide valuable savings from daylight harvesting in addition to occupancy sensors. This ECM includes the installation of occupancy sensors for the remaining classrooms that do not already included occupancy sensors. This ECM also includes daylight sensors for entryways and hallways and stairwells with adequate natural light. The combination of both options has a simple payback of approximately 4.7 years and therefore is a valuable retrofit available for the school.

ECM #7 – Melink Kitchen Exhaust Controls

The commercial kitchen at Overbrook High School has a large potential to reduce energy use based on the constant volume operation of the kitchen exhaust from 6:00AM to 3:00PM. This ECM includes controls to allow the exhaust system to reduce its volume based on the actual use and requirement of the cooking equipment. This saves on exhaust fan energy as well as the energy needed to condition the heated air draw out of the kitchen. The energy savings for this commercial cooking facility is approximately $4,547 per year. The components needed to control the exhaust volume are sensors attached to the kitchen hoods and a variable frequency drive for the kitchen exhaust fan. The installation cost of this equipment and controls has a simple payback of 7.1 years. This ECM is another significant reduction in energy use and recommended for this facility.

REM #1 – Solar Photovoltaic System:

Solar photovoltaic systems have progressed over the years to become a realistic approach for many facilities. With the incentives and energy credits available today, solar PV system installation costs have dropped to provide paybacks less than 15 years such as this facility. Power purchase agreements provide another opportunity for facilities with limited funding to invest in a clean renewable source of energy. Based on the calculated estimate for the maximum roof area available for solar panels (15,000 SF), this facility could generate approximately 16% of their current electric use annually.

Additional Recommendations:

In addition to the ECMs, there are maintenance and operational measures that can provide significant energy savings and provide immediate benefit. The ECMs listed above represent investments that can be made to the facility which are justified by the savings seen overtime. However, the maintenance items and small operational improvements below are typically achievable with on site staff or maintenance contractors and in turn have the potential to provide substantial operational savings compared to the costs associated. The following are recommendations which should be considered a priority in achieving an energy efficient building:

Page 9: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 8 of 55

1. Chemically clean the condenser and evaporator coils periodically to optimize efficiency.

Poorly maintained heat transfer surfaces can reduce efficiency 5-10%.

2. Maintain all weather stripping on entrance doors.

3. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output in order to limit energy use from task lighting.

4. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and maintain better IAQ.

5. Confirm that outside air economizers on the rooftop units are functioning properly to take advantage of free cooling and avoid excess outside air during occupied periods.

6. Seal openings around window unit penetrations to minimize outside air infiltration.

7. Turn off computer monitors and set computers to sleep when not being used. Computer monitors and computers are becoming one of the largest energy consumers in buildings today. Set computers to sleep when not being used and automatically turn off the computer monitors. Do not set computer monitors to “screen saver” mode which saves the screen life, not energy.

Overall, Overbrook High School’s energy use is above average when compared to other schools in the region; however this school is the least energy intensive building of all schools in the district with respect to total area. With the implementation of the recommended ECMs above, the BOE will see a significant step forward on the path of energy reduction.

Page 10: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 9 of 55

II. INTRODUCTION

The comprehensive energy audit covers the 160,000 square foot High School, which includes: classrooms, offices, computer rooms, gymnasium, auditorium, cafeteria, kitchen, maintenance areas and storage areas. Electrical and natural gas utility information is collected and analyzed for one full year’s energy use of the building. The utility information allows for analysis of the building’s operational characteristics; calculate energy benchmarks for comparison to industry averages, estimated savings potential, and baseline usage/cost to monitor the effectiveness of implemented measures. A computer spreadsheet is used to calculate benchmarks and to graph utility information (see the utility profiles below). The Energy Use Index (EUI) is established for the building. Energy Use Index (EUI) is expressed in British Thermal Units/square foot/year (BTU/ft2/yr), which is used to compare energy consumption to similar building types or to track consumption from year to year in the same building. The EUI is calculated by converting the annual consumption of all energy sources to BTU’s and dividing by the area (gross square footage) of the building. Blueprints (where available) are utilized to verify the gross area of the facility. The EUI is a good indicator of the relative potential for energy savings. A low EUI indicates less potential for energy savings, while a high EUI indicates poor building performance therefore a high potential for energy savings. Existing building architectural and engineering drawings (where available) are utilized for additional background information. The building envelope, lighting systems, HVAC equipment, and controls information gathered from building drawings allow for a more accurate and detailed review of the building. The information is compared to the energy usage profiles developed from utility data. Through the review of the architectural and engineering drawings a building profile can be defined that documents building age, type, usage, major energy consuming equipment or systems, etc. The preliminary audit information is gathered in preparation for the site survey. The site survey provides critical information in deciphering where energy is spent and opportunities exist within a facility. The entire site is surveyed to inventory the following to gain an understanding of how each facility operates:

• Building envelope (roof, windows, etc.) • Heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment (HVAC) • Lighting systems and controls • Facility-specific equipment

The building site visit is performed to survey all major building components and systems. The site visit includes detailed inspection of energy consuming components. Summary of building occupancy schedules, operating and maintenance practices, and energy management programs provided by the building manager are collected along with the system and components to determine a more accurate impact on energy consumption.

Page 11: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 10 of 55

III. METHOD OF ANALYSIS

Post site visit work includes evaluation of the information gathered, researching possible conservation opportunities, organizing the audit into a comprehensive report, and making recommendations on HVAC, lighting and building envelope improvements. Data collected is processed using energy engineering calculations to anticipate energy usage for each of the proposed energy conservation measures (ECMs). The actual building’s energy usage is entered directly from the utility bills provided by the owner. The anticipated energy usage is compared to the historical data to determine energy savings for the proposed ECMs. It is pertinent to note, that the savings noted in this report are not additive. The savings for each recommendation is calculated as standalone energy conservation measures. Implementation of more than one ECM may in some cases affect the savings of each ECM. The savings may in some cases be relatively higher if an individual ECM is implemented in lieu of multiple recommended ECMs. For example implementing reduced operating schedules for inefficient lighting will result in a greater relative savings. Implementing reduced operating schedules for newly installed efficient lighting will result in a lower relative savings, because there is less energy to be saved. If multiple ECM’s are recommended to be implemented, the combined savings is calculated and identified appropriately. ECMs are determined by identifying the building’s unique properties and deciphering the most beneficial energy saving measures available that meet the specific needs of the facility. The building construction type, function, operational schedule, existing conditions, and foreseen future plans are critical in the evaluation and final recommendations. Energy savings are calculated base on industry standard methods and engineering estimations. Energy consumption is calculated based on manufacturer’s cataloged information when new equipment is proposed. Cost savings are calculated based on the actual historical energy costs for the facility. Installation costs include labor and equipment costs to estimate the full up-front investment required to implement a change. Costs are derived from Means Cost Data, industry publications, and local contractors and equipment suppliers. The NJ Smart Start Building® program incentives savings (where applicable) are included for the appropriate ECM’s and subtracted from the installed cost. Maintenance savings are calculated where applicable and added to the energy savings for each ECM. The life-time for each ECM is estimated based on the typical life of the equipment being replaced or altered. The costs and savings are applied and a simple payback, simple lifetime savings, and simple return on investment are calculated. See below for calculation methods:

Page 12: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 11 of 55

ECM Calculation Equations:

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛=

SavingsYearlyCostNetPaybackSimple

( )LifetimeECMSavingsYearlySavingsLifetimeSimple ×=

CostNetCostNetSavingsLifetimeSimpleROILifetimeSimple )( −

=

( )LifetimeECMSavingsenanceMaYearlySavingsenanceMaLifetime ×= intint

( )∑=

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

+=

N

nnIRRPeriodofFlowCashturnofRateInternal

0 1Re

( )∑=

⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

+=

N

nnDRPeriodofFlowCashValueesentNet

0 1Pr

Net Present Value calculations based on Interest Rate of 3%.

Page 13: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 12 of 55

IV. HISTORIC ENERGY CONSUMPTION/COST A. Energy Usage / Tariffs The energy usage for the facility has been tabulated and plotted in graph form as depicted within this section. Each energy source has been identified and monthly consumption and cost noted per the information provided by the Owner. The electric usage profile represents the actual electrical usage for the facility. Atlantic City Electric provides electricity to the facility under their Annual General Service Secondary rate structure. The electric utility measures consumption in kilowatt-hours (KWH) and maximum demand in kilowatts (KW). One KWH usage is equivalent to 1000 watts running for one hour. One KW of electric demand is equivalent to 1000 watts running at any given time. The basic usage charges are shown as generation service and delivery charges along with several non-utility generation charges. Rates used in this report reflect the historical data received for the facility. The gas usage profile shows the actual natural gas energy usage for the facility. South Jersey Gas Company provides natural gas to the facility under the General Service - Firm Transportation rate structure. The gas utility measures consumption in cubic feet x 100 (CCF), and converts the quantity into Therms of energy. One Therm is equivalent to 100,000 BTUs of energy. The overall cost for utilities is calculated by dividing the total cost by the total usage. Based on the utility history provided, the average cost for utilities at this facility is as follows:

Description Average

Electricity 14.8¢ / kWh Natural Gas $1.64 / Therm

Page 14: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 13 of 55

Table 3 Electricity Billing Data

Utility Provider: Atlantic City ElectricRate: Annual General Service

Meter No: 58994192Account No. 3138-6769-9990

Third Party Utility NoneTPS Meter / Acct No:

MONTH OF USE CONSUMPTION KWH TOTAL BILL

Mar-09 160,080 $21,011 Apr-09 130,980 $18,033 May-09 118,640 $16,185 Jun-09 151,420 $22,992 Jul-09 98,120 $17,125

Aug-09 91,580 $15,818 Sep-09 114,400 $19,330 Oct-09 136,660 $21,109 Nov-09 126,380 $18,413 Dec-09 152,220 $21,381 Jan-10 162,980 $23,347 Feb-10 151,500 $21,601

Totals 1,594,960 448.4 Max $236,346

AVERAGE DEMAND 398.1 KW averageAVERAGE RATE $0.148 $/kWh

428.4

433.6

DEMAND

216.0359.8

448.4

ELECTRIC USAGE SUMMARY

445.6

404.0

370.6429.0

422.8409.4

409.2

Page 15: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 14 of 55

Figure 1 Electricity Usage Profile

Page 16: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 15 of 55

Table 4 Nat Gas Billing Data

Utility Provider: South Jersey GasRate: Firm Transportation

Meter No: 0326022Account No. 2 20 31 0086 2 0

Third Party Utility Provider: Woodruff EnergyTPS Meter No:

MONTH OF USE CONSUMPTION (THERMS) TOTAL BILL

Mar-09 13,777.20 $22,315.54Apr-09 8,227.38 $13,333.33May-09 2,882.07 $4,698.25Jun-09 1,097.10 $1,807.07Jul-09 62.10 $119.20

Aug-09 10.32 $34.90Sep-09 389.50 $654.92Oct-09 1,832.96 $3,025.48Nov-09 5,668.25 $9,274.93Dec-09 10,588.37 $17,311.82Jan-10 20,005.96 $32,830.64Feb-10 17,135.22 $28,224.39

TOTALS 81,676.43 $133,630.47

AVERAGE RATE: $1.64 $/THERM

NATURAL GAS USAGE SUMMARY

Page 17: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 16 of 55

Figure 2 Nat Gas Usage Profile

Page 18: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 17 of 55

B. Energy Use Index (EUI) Energy Use Index (EUI) is a measure of a building’s annual energy utilization per square foot of building. This calculation is completed by converting all utility usage consumed by a building for one year, to British Thermal Units (BTU) and dividing this number by the building square footage. EUI is a good measure of a building’s energy use and is utilized regularly for comparison of energy performance for similar building types. The Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL) Buildings Technology Center under a contract with the U.S. Department of Energy maintains a Benchmarking Building Energy Performance Program. The ORNL website determines how a building’s energy use compares with similar facilities throughout the U.S. and in a specific region or state. Source use differs from site usage when comparing a building’s energy consumption with the national average. Site energy use is the energy consumed by the building at the building site only. Source energy use includes the site energy use as well as all of the losses to create and distribute the energy to the building. Source energy represents the total amount of raw fuel that is required to operate the building. It incorporates all transmission, delivery, and production losses, which allows for a complete assessment of energy efficiency in a building. The type of utility purchased has a substantial impact on the source energy use of a building. The EPA has determined that source energy is the most comparable unit for evaluation purposes and overall global impact. Both the site and source EUI ratings for the building are provided to understand and compare the differences in energy use. The site and source EUI for this facility is calculated as follows:

FootageSquareBuildingkBtuinUsageGaskBtuinUsageElectricEUISiteBuilding )( +

=

FootageSquareBuildingRatioSSXkBtuinUsageGasRatioSSXkBtuinUsageElectricEUISourceBuilding )( +

=

Page 19: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 18 of 55

Table 5 Facility Energy Use Index (EUI) Calculation

kWh Therms Gallons kBtu kBtu

ELECTRIC 1594960.0 5,445,193 3.340 18,186,946

NATURAL GAS 81676.4 8,167,643 1.047 8,551,522

FUEL OIL 0.0 0 1.010 0

PROPANE 0.0 0 1.010 0

TOTAL 13,612,836 26,738,468

BUILDING AREA 160,000 SQUARE FEETBUILDING SITE EUI 85.08 kBtu/SF/YRBUILDING SOURCE EUI 167.12 kBtu/SF/YR

ENERGY USE INTENSITY CALCULATION

ENERGY TYPESITE-

SOURCE RATIO

BUILDING USE SITE ENERGY SOURCE ENERGY

*Site - Source Ratio data is provided by the Energy Star Performance Rating Methodology for Incorporating Source Energy Use document issued Dec 2007.

Figure 4 below depicts a national EUI grading for the source use of High Schools. Based on the data, Overbrook High School is in the 10th percentile for efficiency (10% of schools are less efficient than Overbrook HS).

Figure 4 Source Energy Use Intensity Distributions: High Schools

SOURCE EUI = 167

Page 20: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 19 of 55

C. EPA Energy Benchmarking System The United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in an effort to promote energy management has created a system for benchmarking energy use amongst various end users. The benchmarking tool utilized for this analysis is entitled Portfolio Manager. The Portfolio Manager tool allows tracking and assessment of energy consumption via the template forms located on the ENERGY STAR website (www.energystar.gov). The importance of benchmarking for local government municipalities is becoming more important as utility costs continue to increase and emphasis is being placed on carbon reduction, greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental impacts. Based on information gathered from the ENERGY STAR website, Government agencies spend more than $10 billion a year on energy to provide public services and meet constituent needs. Furthermore, energy use in commercial buildings and industrial facilities is responsible for more than 50 percent of U.S. carbon dioxide emissions. It is vital that local government municipalities assess facility energy usage, benchmark energy usage utilizing Portfolio Manager, set priorities and goals to lessen energy usage and move forward with priorities and goals. In accordance with the Local Government Energy Audit Program, CEG has created an ENERGY STAR account for the municipality to access and monitoring the facility’s yearly energy usage as it compares to facilities of similar type. The login page for the account can be accessed at the following web address; the username and password are also listed below:

https://www.energystar.gov/istar/pmpam/index.cfm?fuseaction=login.login User Name: pinehillboe Password: lgeaceg2010 Security Question: What city were you born in? Security Answer: “pinehill” The utility bills and other information gathered during the energy audit process are entered into the Portfolio Manager. The following is a summary of the results for the facility:

Table 6 ENERGY STAR Performance Rating

ENERGY STAR PERFORMANCE RATING

FACILITY DESCRIPTION

ENERGY PERFORMANCE

RATING

NATIONAL AVERAGE

Overbrook High School 29 50

Refer to Statement of Energy Performance Appendix for the detailed energy summary.

Page 21: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 20 of 55

V. FACILITY DESCRIPTION

The 160,000 SF High School is a two story facility comprised of classrooms, offices, computer rooms, gymnasium, auditorium, cafeteria, kitchen, maintenance areas and storage areas. The building was built in 1969 with no additions added since the original construction. The school hours of operation are typical for a school; between 7:00AM and 2:30 PM. The gymnasium and auditorium are used after hours for sports and other events. The school is used very minimally in the summer. The school student enrollment is approximately 872 students and 80 teachers.

Building Envelope

The building exterior is comprised of block wall construction with face brick exterior for approximately 50% of the envelope. The remaining walls are made up of aluminum metal panel curtain wall system with approximately 25% windows. Insulation is minimal in the brick faced wall. The curtain wall system includes metal panels with dense fibrous insulation within the metal panels. The roof is a tar roof with approximately 2” rigid foam insulation below the membrane. The roof is topped with light and dark crushed stone. The windows throughout the facility are a combination of fixed pane windows and small operable windows for ventilation. The windows are single pane with clear glass. Overall the envelope for the building is in good condition.

HVAC Systems

The HVAC systems for the high school consist of a central heating plant and scattered AC systems for cooling of select areas of the building. The facility has undergone a slow phase out of window AC units with ductless split systems as window AC unit failures take place. Areas of the building that have air conditioning include: computer rooms, enclosed classrooms without windows, and some offices. The units range from new and great condition to old and poor condition. Most window AC units still in operation are approximately 1 - 1.5 tons in capacity.

The central heating system consists of two 16,737 MBH Cleaver Brooks fire tube boilers. The boilers were originally used to make steam, and since have been converted to hot water. One of the boilers has been retrofitted with new burner controls for improved firing and cycling. The boiler water is pumped throughout the building by two large constant volume 40 HP base mounted end suction pumps. The boiler loop water temperature is controlled based on an outside air temperature reset schedule by a 3-way mixing valve.

Air side systems include unit ventilators for the classrooms and large air handling units for the large spaces such as the gymnasium and auditorium. The unit ventilators and air handling units provide heat and ventilation. All portions of the heating system include pneumatic control valves and dampers. The boiler loop utilizes 3-way control valves on all terminal equipment and air handling units. Ventilation air is provided by outside air dampers at each unit.

Exhaust System

Air is exhausted from the building through the centrifugal roof exhausters. Exhaust is provided for toilet rooms, specialty rooms (such as art rooms, wood shop, chemistry rooms, and biology

Page 22: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 21 of 55

rooms, etc.) and large assembly areas (such as the auditorium and gymnasium). The exhaust is manually controlled manually by the maintenance staff based on temperature and occupancy comfort. The toilet rooms exhaust fans are manually controlled by bath room wall switches. It was noted that some exhaust fans do not include dampers when fans are not running. The commercial kitchen includes two 20 foot by 4 foot commercial exhaust hoods. The hoods are utilized for heat and smoke exhaust over cooking ovens steamers, and a gas fired range. The kitchen hood is manually controlled by a wall switch and operates approximately 8 hrs per day.

HVAC System Controls

The cooling systems throughout the building utilize stand-alone local controls. Space temperature is controlled by dedicated thermostats wired to each AC unit. The majority of the cooling thermostats do not utilize programmability.

The heating system is controlled through pneumatic controls and a central control system. Air for the pneumatic system is provided by a central air tank and dual compressors. The air compressor appears to be recently replaced and in good condition. The air side equipment controls space temperature with 3-way control valves at each unit and a local thermostat. Unit ventilators are turned on and off based on the central control system schedule. Ventilation is provided by outside air dampers at each unit. The classrooms typically include a unit ventilator along with a relief air louver through the exterior wall. All dampers are controlled based on the central control system schedules. Outside air is introduced into the building during occupied periods. In unoccupied periods the outside air dampers close to limit conditioning of outside air.

Domestic Hot Water

Domestic hot water for the restrooms, kitchen, and various sinks throughout the school is provided by a large indirect style hot water tank located in the boiler room. Boiler water is used to heat the domestic hot water with an internal water to water heat exchanger. Since the boiler water is the sole source of domestic hot water heat, the boilers are required to run year round to provide domestic hot water. Boilers are shut down manually only when the building is unoccupied. The domestic hot water piping insulation appeared to be in fair condition. The kitchen dishwasher requires 160°F – 180°F domestic hot water. The domestic hot water temperature is boosted by an under-counter electric booster heater. The capacity information for the booster heater was not accessible.

Lighting & Internal Loads Typical lighting throughout building is fluorescent tube lay-in and pendant fixtures with T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts. Storage rooms and closets are lit with compact fluorescent lamps. The gymnasium is lit with high bay metal halide fixtures. The building exterior is lit with a combination of high pressure sodium lamps and metal halide lamps. The parking lot is lit with light poles and high pressure sodium lamps. All lighting throughout the building is controlled by a combination of manual switches and occupancy sensors. Entrance ways, hallways, stairwells, the gymnasium, and auditorium is manually control along with approximately 33% of the classrooms. Most offices, and private rooms including approximately 66% of the classrooms

Page 23: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 22 of 55

utilize wall or ceiling mounted occupancy sensors. Outdoor lighting is controlled by photocells (dusk to dawn operation) for security needs. Many rooms throughout the building were noted to have high internal loads due to computers. The majority of the computer rooms throughout the building including the majority of private computers within the offices were left on. Approximately 90% of the computers had the either the computers on, or the computers and monitors on. The total quantity of personal desk top style computers in the building is approximately 212 PCs.

Page 24: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 23 of 55

VI. MAJOR EQUIPMENT LIST

The equipment list contains major energy consuming equipment that through implementation of energy conservation measures could yield substantial energy savings. The list shows the major equipment in the facility and all pertinent information utilized in energy savings calculations. An approximate age was assigned to the equipment in some cases if a manufactures date was not shown on the equipment’s nameplate. The ASHRAE service life for the equipment along with the remaining useful life is also shown in the Appendix.

Refer to the Major Equipment List Appendix for this facility.

Page 25: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 24 of 55

VII. ENERGY CONSERVATION MEASURES

ECM #1: Computer Monitor Replacement Description: The computers throughout the elementary school utilize CRT computer monitors. These computer monitors are used at almost every computer work station including the offices, computer labs, lounges, classrooms, etc. These computer monitors are outdated and have several disadvantages such as; significantly increased higher energy consumption, uses large amount of desk space, poor picture quality, distortions and flickering image, secular glare problems, and high weight, and electromagnetic emissions. Many of the drawbacks are difficult to quantify except for the energy use. CRT monitors use considerably more energy than an alternative flat panel LCD monitor. Replacement of the existing CRT monitors with LCD monitors saves considerable energy as well as provides other ergonomic benefits as well. Based on the site survey it was noted that a large number of the computers were left on and allowed to run 24 / 7. The majority of the monitors were left in screen saver mode, which is deceiving since this mode only saves the computer screen from image burn in, however it does not save on energy consumption. The average operating hours for all computers and monitors is estimated based on the site survey observations. Energy consumption of computer monitors are based on manufacture’s specifications. This ECM includes replacement of all existing CRT monitors with LCD flat panel monitors throughout the school. Installation costs were neglected for this ECM with the intention that this ECM would be replaced by the school employees. The calculations are based on the following operating assumptions: Energy Savings Calculations: # of Computers: 212 Run Time %: 90% Weeks per Yr: 40 Hrs per Week: 168

( ) ( )

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

×××=

KWW

HrsOperationWPowerMonitorTimeRunComputersofUsageElectric

1000

%#

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWhCostElecAvekWhUsageElectricCostEnergy $

Page 26: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 25 of 55

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS CRT Monitors LCD Monitor

# of Computers 212 212

Monitor Power Cons. (W) 75 25

Run Time % 90% 90%

Operating Hrs per Week 168 168

Operating Weeks per Yr 40 40

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.148 0.148

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Electric Usage (kWh) 96,163 32,054 64,109

Energy Cost ($) $14,232 $4,744 $9,488

COMMENTS:

COMPUTER MONITOR CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Installation cost of new monitors is estimated based on current pricing for a 17” LCD monitor on the market today. No labor costs were included for replacing the existing monitors with the new monitors. No incentives are available for installation of computer monitors. Net cost per monitor was estimated to be $100. Installation Costs: # Monitors X Cost per Monitor

212 Monitors X $100 per Monitor $21,200

Page 27: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 26 of 55

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $21,200

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $21,200

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $9,488

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $9,488

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 5

Simple Payback 2.2

Simple Lifetime ROI 123.8%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $47,440Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 35%Net Present Value (NPV) $22,252.26

ECM #1 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 28: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 27 of 55

ECM #2: Condensing Boiler Installation Description: The existing boilers at Overbrook High School are large 4 pass steel fire tube boilers made by Cleaver Brooks. These boilers are used as the primary source of heat for the entire building. The boilers are original to the building and are over half of its life expectancy for typical fire tube boilers. The equipment appears to be maintained in fair operating condition. Even for boilers that are close to the end of its life it is difficult to predict the point at which the boiler becomes inoperable. With the increased efficiency of new condensing boilers, the savings through a replacement can be substantial. New condensing boilers could substantially improve the operating efficiency of the heating system of the building. Condensing boiler’s peak efficiency tops out at 99% depending on return water temperature. Due to the operating conditions of the building, the annual average operating efficiency of the proposed condensing boiler is expected to be 88%. The existing boiler’s efficiency is approximately 75%, which makes the condensing boilers an 13% increase in efficiency. This ECM is based on variable supply water temperature adjusted based on outdoor temperature. In addition to the space heating savings, the condensing boilers would provide an added benefit for the domestic hot water production. The existing domestic hot water is heated indirectly through a heat exchanger located in a large domestic hot water tank. The domestic hot water efficiency is equal to the boiler operating efficiency. The condensing boilers would provide hot water a increased efficiency. The domestic hot water efficiency would be improved by 13% for all hours in the heating season. In the non heating season the condensing boilers would be able to produce domestic hot water at approximately 95% efficiency since the operating boiler water temperature would be reduced dramatically compared to the heating season. This ECM includes installation of multiple condensing gas fired boilers to replace the existing fire tube boilers. The basis for this ECM is six Aerco Benchmark 3.0 Series Condensing boilers. The boiler installation is based on equal capacity of one of the existing fire-tube boilers. One additional condensing boiler is included in this ECM for redundancy.

Page 29: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 28 of 55

Energy Savings Calculations: Total Non Heating Hot Water Gas Use: 1559 Therms (Total June thru September Gas Use) Total Heating Gas Use: 80,117 Therms (Total Oct thru May)

( ) ( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛××=

ThermBTUHeatValueFuelEffHeatingThermsGasNatExistingquiredHeatBldg %.Re

( )

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×

=

ThermBTUValueHeatFuelEffHeating

BTUquiredHeatBldgUsageGasHeatingoposed%.

RePr

( ) ( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛××=

ThermBTUHeatValueFuelEffThermsGasNatHeatingNonquiredHeatDomSummer %.Re.

( )

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×

=

ThermBTUValueHeatFuelEff

BTUquiredHeatDomSummerUsageGasDomSummeroposed%.

Re.Pr

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

ThermCostFuelAveThermsUsageGasHeatingCostEnergy $

Page 30: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 29 of 55

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

ECM INPUTS Existing Fire-Tube Boilers

New Condensing Boilers

Existing Heating Nat Gas (Therms) 80,117 N/A

Existing Non Heating Hot Water Nat Gas (Therms) 1,559 N/A

Boiler Heating Efficiency (%) 77% 88% 11%

Boiler Dom HW Efficiency (%) 77% 95% 18%

Building Heat Required (kBTUs) 6,169,009 6,169,009

Summer Dom. HW Heat Required (kBTUs) 120,043 120,043

Gas Cost ($/Therm) 1.64 1.64

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Natural Gas Usage (Therms) 81,676 71,366 10,310

Energy Cost ($) $133,949 $117,040 $16,908

COMMENTS:

CONDENSING BOILER CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

Installation cost of the six new modular condensing boilers, demolition of the existing boilers, flue piping, boiler water piping modifications, gas piping modifications, electric work, etc. is estimated to be $562,270. From the NJ Smart Start Appendix, the installation of new condensing boilers warrants the following incentive: $1.00 per MBH.

( ) ( ) 000,18$00.1$000,1800.1$StartSmart =×=×=® MBHBoilerIncentive

Page 31: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 30 of 55

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $562,270

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $1,397

Net Installation Cost ($): $560,873

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $16,908

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $16,908

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 25

Simple Payback 33.2

Simple Lifetime ROI -24.6%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $422,700Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -2%Net Present Value (NPV) ($266,451.50)

ECM #2 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 32: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 31 of 55

ECM #3: Pump VFD Retrofit Description: The unit ventilators are utilizing a constant volume pumping design. The unit ventilators have 3-way control valves which allow continuous flow through the piping loop throughout the building. As a result the water loop pumps must provide full power output to circulate the water through all unit ventilators continuously. The 2-way control valves provide flow through the unit ventilators only when there is no call for heating or cooling, unlike 3-way control valves that allow constant flow of the water loop. 3-way control valves require full pumping energy continuously, while 2-way control valves allows the system to reduce flow when it is not needed. This measure includes capping off the bypass port on the 3-way control valves which effectively turns the valves into “2-way” control valves. When the unit ventilator is not calling for heating, the control valve closes reducing overall flow of the system. Variable frequency drives allow the pumps to slow down in response to a reduction in overall system flow. The reduction in operating flow allows the pumps to reduce energy consumption for all hours that the heating system is not at its peak load. This ECM includes the installation of Variable Frequency Drives on the two (2) existing 40 horsepower pumps in conjunction with piping modifications at each unit ventilator to cap off the bypass port on the 3-way control valves. The VFD’s would be controlled by a differential pressure sensor in the water loop to measure demand for water. The furthest unit ventilators from the loop pumps would remain as 3-way control valves (constant flow) to eliminate dead heading potential. This ECM also includes replacement of the existing pump motors with inverter duty motors that meet NEMA Premium Efficiency Standard, which also helps to reduce energy consumption. Energy and cost savings calculations are based on calculation software “PumpSave v4.2,” provided by ABB. The PumpSave calculation software is used to estimate the pumping energy for variable speed pump systems. The boiler water loop pump operation is estimated to be 4,380 Hrs per year since this system is used for about 6 months total. The pump flow, HD, and resultant energy are calculated based on the existing pump horse power installed. Energy Savings Calculations: Existing Pump #1 Efficiency: 90% (Est) Existing Pump #2 Efficiency: 94% Ave Existing Pumping Efficiency: 92%

( )( )

( ) ( )%%3960min.

EfficiencyMotorEfficiencyPump

FtHeadGalRateFlowGravitySpecificHPPowerVolumeCons

××

×⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×

=

Page 33: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 32 of 55

( ) ( ) ( ).746.0. HrsOperationHPKWHPPowerkWhConsEnergy ×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWhCostElectricAvekWhUsageEnergyCostEnergy $

Page 34: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 33 of 55

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGSECM INPUTS CV Pumps VFD Pumps

Flow Control CV VFD

Flow (GPM) 1254 1400

Head (Ft) 84 94

Pump Efficiency (%) 92% 92%

Motor Efficiency (%) 92% 94%

Operating Hrs 4380 4380

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.148 0.148

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Electric Energy (kWh) 205,376 94,000 111,376

Electric Energy Cost ($) $30,396 $13,912 $16,484

BOILER HOT WATER PUMPS VFD CALULATION

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

COMMENTS: VFD pump energy is based on ABB energy savings calculator for pumps, "Pump Save," version 4.2. Flow rate for VFD Pump calculation is summarized in the operating profile shown in the Pump Save output.

Installation cost for two (2) VFDs, piping work, re-balancing, capping of 3-way valves and controls is estimated to be $59,788. There are no incentives available for installation of variable frequency drives for boiler water systems.

Page 35: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 34 of 55

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $74,988

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $74,988

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $16,484

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $16,484

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 20

Simple Payback 4.5

Simple Lifetime ROI 339.6%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $329,680Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 22%Net Present Value (NPV) $170,252.30

ECM #3 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 36: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 35 of 55

ECM #4: AC Rooftop Units Replacement Description: The majority of the rooftop units at Overbrook High School are packaged split system direct expansion cooling units. Some of the existing rooftop units at the High school are old and in poor condition. The majority of the older units have been replaced with new efficient units. The existing units are inefficient compared to today’s high efficiency units. The efficiencies are estimated based on the age of the equipment. The efficiency of the existing units is estimated to be 10 SEER in cooling operation. This ECM includes installation of new rooftop units to replace the existing units. New high efficiency rooftop units are based on Rheem’s packaged units and split system units. Cooling efficiency is 14 SEER. These units will replace several of the split system units ranging from 1.5 to 5 tons. Energy Savings Calculations: Average Electric costs: $0.148 / kWh (*based on summer time average rates)

( )

⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×⎟

⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛

×⎟⎟⎠

⎞⎜⎜⎝

⎛×

=

WhBtuSEER

kWhWh

HrsLoadCoolingSeasonalhrTon

BtuTonsCoolingeEnergyUsag

1000

.000,12

( )

CoolingofHrskWhSavingsEnergyDemand =

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWhCostElectricAvekWhUsageEnergyCostCooling $

Page 37: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 36 of 55

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

ECM INPUTS Existing AC Units High Efficiency AC Units

AC System #1 Tonnage 7.5 7.5

AC System #1 Efficiency (SEER) 10.0 14.0

AC System #2 Total AC System Tonnage 1.5 1.5

AC System #2 Efficiency (SEER) 10.0 14.0

AC System #3 Total AC System Tonnage 5.0 5.0

AC System #3 Efficiency (SEER) 8.0 17.0

Seasonal Cooling Hrs 1200 1200

Elec Cost ($/kWh) 0.148 0.148

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Electric Energy (kWh) 21,960 13,492 8,468

Electric Demand (KW) 18.3 11.2 7.1

Electric Energy Cost ($) $3,250 $1,997 $1,253

AC SYSTEM REPLACEMENT CALCULATIONS

ENERGY SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

COMMENTS: Seasonal load hours is estimated. Proposed High Efficiency AC units is based on Rheem Prestige Series units

Installation cost for the five (5) new rooftop split system units (two 3-ton units, one 5-ton unit and one 5-ton heat pump unit) is estimated to be $24,194. From the NJ Smart Start® Program appendix, the packaged unit’s replacement falls under the categories “Unitary AC” and “Water Source Heat Pump” which warrants an incentive based on efficiency (SEER) at or above 14.0. The incentives are as follows: Unitary HVAC = $92/ton Water Source Heat Pump = $81/ton

Page 38: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 37 of 55

( )( ) 369,1$)81$0.2(92$0.8

/81$(/92$StartSmart =×+×=

×+×=® TonTonnagePumpHeatTonTonnageACUnitaryIncentive

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $24,194

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $1,369

Net Installation Cost ($): $22,825

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $1,253

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $1,253

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 18.2

Simple Lifetime ROI -17.7%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $18,795Internal Rate of Return (IRR) -2%Net Present Value (NPV) ($7,866.77)

ECM #4 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 39: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 38 of 55

ECM #5: Lighting Upgrades Description: Compact fluorescent lamps (CFL’s) were created to be direct replacements for the standard incandescent lamps which are common to table lamps, spot lights, hi-hats, bathroom vanity lighting, etc. The light output of the CFL has been designed to resemble the incandescent lamp. The color rendering index (CRI) of the CFL is much higher than standard fluorescent lighting, and therefore provides a much “truer” light. The CFL is available in a myriad of shapes and sizes depending on the specific application. Typical replacements are: a 13-Watt CFL for a 60-Watt incandescent lamp, an 18-Watt CFL for a 75-Watt incandescent lamp, and a 26-Watt CFL for a 100-Watt incandescent lamp. The CFL is also available for a number of “brightness colors” that is indicated by the Kelvin rating. A 2700K CFL is the “warmest” color available and is closest in color to the incandescent lamp. CFL’s are also available in 3000K, 3500K, and 4100K. The 4100K would be the “brightest” or “coolest” output. A CFL can be chosen to screw right into your existing fixtures, or hardwired into your existing fixtures. Metal halide fixtures are utilized in the gymnasium of Overbrook High School. The 400 watt metal halide fixtures are fairly efficiency than, however they have some draw backs including poor lumen maintenance (approximately 30% reduction in lighting output at 40% of rated lamp life). Also, the fixture ballast can be noisy, require up to 10 minutes to re-strike after shutdown, and there is a noticeable color shift as the lamp approaches the end of its life. T-5 and T-8 high output fixtures are designed to be direct replacements for old metal halide fixtures. T-5 & T-8 fixtures are more efficient than probe start metal halides, as well as provide excellent lumen maintenance, no color shift, and minimal warm up time. This ECM includes replacement of all incandescent bulbs to compact fluorescent bulbs. Where the existing fixture is controlled by a dimmer switch, the CFL bulb must be compatible with a dimmer switch. The energy usage of an incandescent compared to a compact fluorescent is approximately 3 to 4 times greater. In addition to the energy savings, compact fluorescent fixtures burn-hours are 8 to 15 times longer than incandescent fixtures ranging from 6,000 to 15,000 burn-hours compared to incandescent fixtures ranging from 750 to 1000 burn-hours. This ECM also includes installation of T-5 high output fluorescent fixtures to replace the existing metal halide fixtures. The fluorescent replacement for metal halide fixtures uses approximately 40% less energy. The life span and total replacement cost of metal halides and fluorescent fixtures are similar and therefore maintenance savings are minimal. Est. Hours of Operation: Classrooms, Bathrooms, & Office: 2600 Hrs per year. Restrooms: 1300 Hrs per year. Hallways: 3600 Hrs per year. Storage rooms and janitor closets: 800 Hrs per year. Exterior Lights: 4200 Hrs per year.

Page 40: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 39 of 55

Energy Savings Calculations: Refer to the Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix for a detailed energy savings calculation for the replacement of the incandescent lamps with compact fluorescent lamps. From the NJ Smart Start Appendix, the installation of new T-5 fluorescent fixtures in lieu of the existing 400W metal halide fixtures warrants the following incentive:

( ) ( ) 100,1$25$4425$#StartSmart =×=×=® fixturesofIncentive Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $13,450

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $1,100

Net Installation Cost ($): $12,350

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $6,244

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $6,244

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 2.0

Simple Lifetime ROI 658.4%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $93,660Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 50%Net Present Value (NPV) $62,190.47

ECM #5 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 41: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 40 of 55

ECM #6: Lighting Occupancy Sensors / Daylight Sensors Description: In some areas the lighting is left on unnecessarily. In many cases the lights are left on because of the inconvenience to manually switch lights off when a room is left or on when a room is first occupied. This is common in rooms that are occupied for only short periods and only a few times per day. In some instances lights are left on due to the misconception that it is better to keep the lights on rather than to continuously switch lights on and off. Although increased switching reduces lamp life, the energy savings outweigh the lamp replacement costs. The payback timeframe for when to turn the lights off is approximately two minutes. If the lights are expected to be off for at least a two minute interval, then it pays to shut them off.

Lighting controls come in many forms. Sometimes an additional switch is adequate to provide reduced lighting levels when full light output is not needed. Occupancy sensors detect motion and will switch the lights on when the room is occupied. Occupancy sensors can either be mounted in place of a current wall switch, or on the ceiling to cover large areas. The U.S. Department of Energy sponsored a study to analyze energy savings achieved through various types of building system controls. The referenced savings is based on the “Advanced Sensors and Controls for Building Applications: Market Assessment and Potential R&D Pathways,” document posted for public use April 2005. The study has found that commercial buildings have the potential to achieve significant energy savings through the use of building controls. The average energy savings are as follows based on the report:

• Occupancy Sensors for Lighting Control - 20%-28%.

Energy savings achieved for “Occupancy Sensors for Lighting Control” average 20%-28%. Savings resulting from the implementation of this ECM for energy management controls are estimated to be 10% of the total light energy controlled by occupancy sensors and 20% to 28% of the total light energy controlled by daylight or combination of control technologies (savings vary depending on space type and conditions surveyed in the field. The majority of the savings is expected to be after school hours when rooms are left with lights on. This ECM includes replacement of standard wall switches with sensors wall switches for all individual offices, classrooms, large bathrooms, and libraries. Sensors shall be manufactured by Sensorswitch, Watt Stopper or equivalent. The Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix of this report includes the summary of lighting controls implemented in this ECM and outlines the proposed controls, costs, savings, and payback periods. The calculations adjust the lighting power usage by the applicable percent savings for each area that includes lighting controls. Energy Savings Calculations:

Page 42: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 41 of 55

( )( )YrkWhEnergyLightControlledSavingsSavingsEnergy /% ×=

( ) ⎟⎠⎞

⎜⎝⎛×=

kWhCostElecAvekWhSavingsEnergySavings $.

Installation cost per dual-technology sensors (Basis: Sensor switch or equivalent) are as follows:

Dual Technology Occupancy Sensor: $160 per installation Daylight Sensor: $280 per installation 2-Pole Power Pack – Dual Technology Occ. Sensor: $225 per installation See the Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix for details. From the NJ Smart Start Appendix, the installation of a lighting control device warrants the following incentive: Ceiling mount remote lighting controls = $35 per control. Wall mount remote lighting controls = $20 per control

( )( ) 335$)20$8(35$5

)35(#20$#StartSmart =×+×=

×+×=® mountceilingofmountwallofIncentive

Page 43: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 42 of 55

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $6,325

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $335

Net Installation Cost ($): $5,990

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $1,277

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $1,277

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 4.7

Simple Lifetime ROI 219.8%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings 0

Simple Lifetime Savings $19,155Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 20%Net Present Value (NPV) $9,254.74

ECM #6 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 44: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 43 of 55

ECM #7: High School Kitchen Exhaust Hood Controls Description: The Pine Hill High School kitchen is equipped with two exhaust hoods for the cooking ranges. The size of each range hood is 4’x20’. The kitchen exhaust fan is controlled manually by a switch on the kitchen hoods. Standard kitchen hood controls consist of switches and relays that interlock the kitchen grease hood exhaust fan(s) with the 100% outside air unit that provides make-up air for this system. Normal occupation of kitchen hood system is limited to occupied hours. During the site inspection it was noted that the kitchen exhaust fan runs for approximately 4 hours a day. Based on the operation, there is great potential energy savings through better controls of the hood exhaust fan and make-up air unit. It should be noted that make up air is supplied via transfer air from the food line area and adjacent corridors. This energy conservation measure involves installing a Melink Kitchen Hood Variable Air Volume Controller; variable frequency drive on the kitchen hood exhaust fan; and turn off all the kitchen hood exhaust systems when the kitchen is closed. When the cooking appliances are turned on, the hood exhaust fan speed will increase based on the hood exhaust temperature. During heavy cooking, the kitchen hood exhaust fan increases to 100% speed until the smoke/vapor is removed. Energy savings are also realized when the kitchen equipment is operating at less than full load due to minimal cooking operations. During these times the fan speed decreases, removing only the necessary amount of air, saving exhaust fan energy and make up air conditioning energy. Energy Calculations Summary: Detailed calculations for the proposed kitchen hood control system can be found in the Kitchen Exhaust Calculations Appendix. It is pertinent to note that the calculation assumes the exhaust fans and make-up air unit are manually turned on for approximately 9 hours per day. Installed cost of the kitchen hood control system is $32,237.

Page 45: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 44 of 55

ECM INPUTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

ECM INPUTS

Existing Uncontrolled

Kitchen Exhaust System

New MELINK Kitchen Exhaust Controls System

Fan Power Usage (kWh) 5,875 1,639 4,236

Gas Usage (MMbtu) 507 268 239

Cooling Energy (kWh) 0 0 0

Average Gas Cost ($/Therm) 1.64 1.64

Electric Cost ($/KWH) 0.148 0.148

ECM RESULTS EXISTING PROPOSED SAVINGS

Gas Energy Cost ($) $8,316 $4,396 $3,920

Electric Energy Cost ($) $869 $243 $627

Total Energy Cost ($) $9,186 $4,638 $4,547

COMMENTS:

KITCHEN EXHAUST CONTROLS CALCULATION

SAVINGS CALCULATIONS

*ECM is based on calculations done by MELINK Intelli-hood controls manufacturer.

Page 46: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 45 of 55

Energy Savings Summary:

Installation Cost ($): $32,237

NJ Smart Start Equipment Incentive ($): $0

Net Installation Cost ($): $32,237

Maintenance Savings ($/Yr): $0

Energy Savings ($/Yr): $4,547

Total Yearly Savings ($/Yr): $4,547

Estimated ECM Lifetime (Yr): 15

Simple Payback 7.1

Simple Lifetime ROI 111.6%

Simple Lifetime Maintenance Savings $0

Simple Lifetime Savings $68,205Internal Rate of Return (IRR) 11%Net Present Value (NPV) $22,045.19

ECM #7 - ENERGY SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 47: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 46 of 55

VIII. RENEWABLE/DISTRIBUTED ENERGY MEASURES Globally, renewable energy has become a priority affecting international and domestic energy policy. The State of New Jersey has taken a proactive approach, and has recently adopted in its Energy Master Plan a goal of 30% renewable energy by 2020. To help reach this goal New Jersey created the Office of Clean Energy under the direction of the Board of Public Utilities and instituted a Renewable Energy Incentive Program to provide additional funding to private and public entities for installing qualified renewable technologies. A renewable energy source can greatly reduce a building’s operating expenses while producing clean environmentally friendly energy. CEG has assessed the feasibility of installing renewable energy measures (REM) for the municipality utilizing renewable technologies and concluded that there is potential for solar energy generation. The solar photovoltaic system calculation summary will be concluded as REM#1 within this report. Solar energy produces clean energy and reduces a building’s carbon footprint. This is accomplished via photovoltaic panels which can be mounted on all south and southwestern facades of the building. Flat roof, as well as sloped areas can be utilized; flat areas will have the panels turned to an optimum solar absorbing angle. (A structural survey of the roof would be necessary before the installation of PV panels is considered). Parking lots can also be utilized for the installation of a solar array. A truss system can be installed that is high enough to park a vehicle under the array, this way no parking lot area is lost. The state of New Jersey has instituted a program in which one Solar Renewable Energy Certificate (SREC) is given to the Owner for every 1000 kWh of generation. SREC’s can be sold anytime on the market at their current market value. The value of the credit varies upon the current need of the power companies. The average value per credit is around $350, this value was used in our financial calculations. This equates to $0.35 per kWh generated. CEG has reviewed the ground area near-by being audited for the purposes of determining a potential for a parking lot canopy system. A ground area of 15,000 S.F. can be utilized for a PV system, totaling. A depiction of the area utilized is shown in Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculation Appendix. Using this square footage it was determined that a system size of 211.37 kilowatts could be installed. A system of this size has an estimated kilowatt hour production of 258,221 KWh annually, reducing the overall utility bill by approximately 16% percent. A detailed financial analysis can be found in the Renewable / Distributed Energy Measures Calculation Appendix. This analysis illustrates the payback of the system over a 25 year period. The eventual degradation of the solar panels and the price of accumulated SREC’s are factored into the payback. The proposed photovoltaic array layout is designed based on the specifications for the Sun Power SPR-230 panel. This panel has a “DC” rated full load output of 230 watts, and has a total panel conversion efficiency of 18%. Although panels rated at higher wattages are available through Sun Power and other various manufacturers, in general most manufacturers who produce commercially available solar panels produce a similar panel in the 200 to 250 watt range. This provides more manufacturer options to the public entity if they wish to pursue the proposed solar recommendation without losing significant system capacity.

Page 48: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 47 of 55

The array system capacity was sized on available ground space for the existing area around the facility. Estimated solar array generation was then calculated based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1.0 Calculator. In order to calculate the array generation an appropriate location with solar data on file must be selected. In addition the system DC rated kilowatt (kW) capacity must be inputted, a DC to AC de-rate factor, panel tilt angle, and array azimuth angle. The DC to AC de-rate factor is based on the panel nameplate DC rating, inverter and transformer efficiencies (95%), mismatch factor (98%), diodes and connections (100%), dc and ac wiring(98%, 99%), soiling, (95%), system availability (95%), shading (if applicable), and age(new/100%). The overall DC to AC de-rate factor has been calculated at an overall rating of 81%. The PVWatts Calculator program then calculates estimated system generation based on average monthly solar irradiance and user provided inputs. The monthly energy generation and offset electric costs from the PVWatts calculator is shown in the Renewable/Distributed Energy Measures Calculation Appendix. The proposed solar array is qualified by the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities Net Metering Guidelines as a Class I Renewable Energy Source. These guidelines allow onsite customer generation using renewable energy sources such as solar and wind with a capacity of 2 megawatts (MW) or less. This limits a customer system design capacity to being a net user and not a net generator of electricity on an annual basis. Although these guidelines state that if a customer does net generate (produce more electricity than they use), the customer will be credited those kilowatt-hours generated to be carried over for future usage on a month to month basis. Then, on an annual basis if the customer is a net generator the customer will then be compensated by the utility the average annual PJM Grid LMP price per kilowatt-hour for the over generation. Due to the aforementioned legislation, the customer is at limited risk if they generate more than they use at times throughout the year. With the inefficiency of today’s energy storage systems, such as batteries, the added cost of storage systems is not warranted and was not considered in the proposed design. Direct purchase involves the State Police Barracks paying for 100% of the total project cost upfront via one of the methods noted in the Installation Funding Options section below. Calculations include a utility inflation rate as well as the degradation of the solar panels over time. Based on our calculations the following is the payback period:

Table 9 Financial Summary – Photovoltaic System

FINANCIAL SUMMARY - PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEM

PAYMENT TYPE SIMPLE PAYBACK

INTERNAL RATE OF RETURN

Direct Purchase 13.15 Years 6.3% *The solar energy measure is shown for reference in the executive summary Renewable Energy Measure (REM) table Given the large amount of capital required by the High School to invest in a solar system through a Direct Purchase CEG does not recommend the High School pursue this route. It would be more advantageous for the High School to solicit Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) Providers

Page 49: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 48 of 55

who will own, operate, and maintain the system for a period of 15 years. During this time the PPA Provider would sell all of the electric generated by Solar Arrays to the High School at a reduced rate compared to their existing electric rate. If Overbrook High School were to find additional funding to reduce the solar system installation costs, a direct purchase option could become increasingly favorable over a PPA and would become the preferred recommendation. In addition to the Solar Analysis, CEG also conducted a review of the applicability of wind energy for the facility. Wind energy production is another option available through the Renewable Energy Incentive Program. Wind turbines of various types can be utilized to produce clean energy on a per building basis. Cash incentives are available per kWh of electric usage. Based on CEG’s review of the applicability of wind energy for the facility, it was determined that the average wind speed is not adequate for purchase of a commercial wind turbine. Therefore, wind energy is not a viable option to implement.  

Page 50: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 49 of 55

IX. ENERGY PURCHASING AND PROCUREMENT STRATEGY Load Profile: Load Profile analysis was performed to determine the seasonal energy usage of the facility. Irregularities in the load profile will indicate potential problems within the facility. Consequently based on the profile a recommendation will be made to remedy the irregularity in energy usage. For this report, the facility’s energy consumption data was gathered in table format and plotted in graph form to create the load profile. Refer to The Electric and Natural Gas Usage Profiles included within this report to reference the respective electricity and natural gas usage load profiles. Electricity: The Electric Usage Profile demonstrates an a-typical load profile with respect to the other schools in the district. The lowest consumption and demand occur in the months of July through September. This is a result of the low occupancy of the school in the summer, however it is unexpected in the month of September when school is in session and there is an increased cooling load. The remainder of the year shows the largest usage spanning the months of December through March. This is a result of electric resistance heat provided for various locations throughout the building. The demand has a fairly steady profile throughout the school months. The demand in the summer months drops dramatically with the reduction in occupancy levels. The load profile shows the potential schools to minimizing electric usage in unoccupied seasons. The overall load factor (L.F.) of the building is 41%. This is the highest load factor of all of the schools in the district. Load factor is the total usage divided by the demand times the hours. A load factor of 41% means that the equivalent full load electrical draw accounts for 41% of the total time. Load factor is a measurement of a building’s unpredictability with respect to electric use. A high load factor means the building’s electric use is steadier and therefore more advantageous for energy suppliers. In general terms, a higher load factor of 50% or more along with a flat load profile will allow for more competitive energy prices when shopping for alternative suppliers. Natural Gas: The natural gas usage profile demonstrates a very typical heat load profile. The summer months demonstrate very low consumption July through September. There is an increase in consumption October through June. The demand for natural gas is noted to extend very close to the school months. This is due to the boiler operation which must remain operation to provide the building’s domestic hot water. Heat is provided for this facility by natural gas-fired boilers. There are no supplemental gas fired hot water heaters at this facility. A base-load shaping (flat profile) will secure more competitive energy prices when procuring through an alternative energy source.

Page 51: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 50 of 55

Tariff Analysis: Electricity: This facility receives electrical service through Atlantic City Electric on their Annual General Service (AGS-Secondary) rate. This service classification is available for general service purposes on secondary voltages. This facility’s rate is a three phase service at secondary voltages. For electric supply (generation), the customer has the option to purchase energy through the utility’s Generation Charge or a Third Party Supplier (TPS). This facility utilizes the generation service provide through Atlantic City Electric (BGS), Therefore, they will pay according to the default service. The Delivery Service includes the following charges: Customer Charge, Distribution Charge (kW Demand), Reactive Demand Charge (kvar Demand, over 1/3 kW), Distribution Charge kWh, Non-utility Generation Charge, Societal benefits Charge kWh, Regulatory Assets Recovery Charge kWh, Transition Bond Charge kWh, Market Transition Charge Tax kWh, System Control Charge kWh, CIEP Standby Fee kWh, Transmission Demand Charge kW, Reliability Must Run Transmission Surcharge kWh, Transmission Enhancement Charge kWh, Basic Generation Service Charge kWh, Regional Greenhouse Gas Initiative Recovery Charge kWh, Infrastructure Investment Surcharge. The Demand charges are based on a ratchet demand rate of 80% of the highest demand set in the months of June through September. The usage charges are based on a stepped rate structure. The demand charges are approximately equal to usage charges on a typical basis making this rate structure somewhat dependent on demand for the delivery portion of the electric charges. The steps for the usage charges are very small increments of change which result in fairly steady costs per kWh per month, however the rates do increase in the summer significantly compared to the winter. The average summer (June through September) electric rate is 18% higher than the average winter electric rate. Natural Gas: This facility receives natural gas service through South Jersey Gas Company on its General Service Gas rate. This is a firm delivery service (higher level of delivery) for general purposes where 1) customer does not qualify for any other rate schedule. Customers may either purchase gas supply from a Third Party (TPS) or from Public Services Basic Gas Supply Service default service as detailed in the rate schedule. This service has a much higher priority of delivery, based on the pipeline capacity. The “firm” service is the highest priority, and does not get interrupted. This rate schedule has a Delivery Charge Mechanism which includes: Basic Gas Supply Service Charge, Capital Investment Recovery Charge, Transportation Initiation Charge, Societal Benefits Charge, Temperature Adjustment Charge, Balancing Service Charge, Economic Development Rate Charge, Conservation Incentive Program Charge, and Energy Efficiency Tracker Charge. The customer can elect to have the Supply Charge (Commodity Charge) serviced through the utility or by a Third Party Supplier (TPS). Note: If the facility should choose to utilize a third party supplier (TPS) and the TPS not deliver, the customer may receive service from South Jersey Gas under Emergency Sales Service. Emergency Sales Service carries an extremely high

Page 52: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 51 of 55

penalty cost of service. Should the TPS un-deliver to the utility on behalf of the client, the utility will automatically supply this default service to the client. Imbalances occur when Third Party Suppliers are used to supply natural gas, full-delivery is not made, and when a new supplier is contracted or the customer returns to the utility. It is important when utilizing a Third Party Supplier, that an experienced regional supplier is used. Otherwise, imbalances can occur, jeopardizing economics and scheduling. Recommendations: CEG recommends a global approach that will be consistent with all facilities within the BOE. Based on the latest electric utility bill, the average price per kWh (kilowatt hour) for the building based on 1-year historical average price is $.1200/kWh (this is the average “price to compare” if the client intends to shop for energy). The average price per decatherm for natural gas based on 1-year historical average price is $ 11.89 / dth (this is the Marketer Gas charges for comparison if the client intends to shop for energy, dth is the common unit of measure). Energy commodities are among the most volatile of all commodities, however at this point and time, energy is fairly competitive. The prices currently paid for electric and natural gas appear to be only slightly high for electricity and fairly high for natural gas compared to the average reported prices from the Energy Information Administration website (EIA) for the past few months. The average retail price for electricity in 2008 was $.1444/kWh (this is the overall retail price). The average third party supply price for natural gas in Dec-09 through Feb-10 was $10.70/ dth (this is the commodity costs only). It is recommended that the BOE consider procuring energy through alternative supply sources to shop for the most competitive prices. CEG also recommends that the BOE schedule a meeting with the current utility providers to review their utility charges and current tariff structures for electricity and natural gas. This meeting would provide insight regarding alternative procurement options that are currently available. Through its meeting with the Local Distribution Company (LDC), the BOE can learn more about the competitive supply process. Pine Hill can acquire a list of approved Third Party Suppliers from the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities website at www.nj.gov/bpu. The BOE should consider using a billing-auditing service to further analyze the utility invoices, manage the data and use the information for ongoing demand-side management projects. Furthermore, special attention should be given to credit mechanisms, imbalances, balancing charges and commodity charges when meeting with the utility representative. The BOE should ask the utility representative about alternative billing options, such as consolidated billing when utilizing the service of a Third Party Supplier. Finally, if the supplier for energy (natural gas) is changed, closely monitor balancing, particularly when the contract is close to termination. This could be performed with the aid of an “energy advisor”.

Page 53: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 52 of 55

X. INSTALLATION FUNDING OPTIONS CEG has reviewed various funding options for the facility owner to utilize in subsidizing the costs for installing the energy conservation measures noted within this report. Below are a few alternative funding methods:

i. Energy Savings Improvement Program (ESIP) – Public Law 2009, Chapter 4

authorizes government entities to make energy related improvements to their facilities and par for the costs using the value of energy savings that result from the improvements. The “Energy Savings Improvement Program (ESIP)” law provides a flexible approach that can allow all government agencies in New Jersey to improve and reduce energy usage with minimal expenditure of new financial resources.

ii. Municipal Bonds – Municipal bonds are a bond issued by a city or other local

government, or their agencies. Potential issuers of municipal bonds include cities, counties, redevelopment agencies, school districts, publicly owned airports and seaports, and any other governmental entity (or group of governments) below the state level. Municipal bonds may be general obligations of the issuer or secured by specified revenues. Interest income received by holders of municipal bonds is often exempt from the federal income tax and from the income tax of the state in which they are issued, although municipal bonds issued for certain purposes may not be tax exempt.

iii. Power Purchase Agreement – Public Law 2008, Chapter 3 authorizes contractor

of up to fifteen (15) years for contracts commonly known as “power purchase agreements.” These are programs where the contracting unit (Owner) procures a contract for, in most cases, a third party to install, maintain, and own a renewable energy system. These renewable energy systems are typically solar panels, windmills or other systems that create renewable energy. In exchange for the third party’s work of installing, maintaining and owning the renewable energy system, the contracting unit (Owner) agrees to purchase the power generated by the renewable energy system from the third party at agreed upon energy rates.

iv. Pay For Performance – The New Jersey Smart Start Pay for Performance

program includes incentives based on savings resulted from implemented ECMs. The program is available for all buildings that were audited as part of the NJ Clean Energy’s Local Government Energy Audit Program. The facility’s participation in the program is assisted by an approved program partner. An “Energy Reduction Plan” is created with the facility and approved partner to shown at least 15% reduction in the building’s current energy use. Multiple energy conservation measures implemented together are applicable toward the total savings of at least 15%. No more than 50% of the total energy savings can result from lighting upgrades / changes.

Page 54: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 53 of 55

Total incentive is capped at 50% of the project cost. The program savings is broken down into three benchmarks; Energy Reduction Plan, Project Implementation, and Measurement and Verification. Each step provides additional incentives as the energy reduction project continues. The benchmark incentives are as follows:

1. Energy Reduction Plan – Upon completion of an energy reduction

plan by an approved program partner, the incentive will grant $0.10 per square foot between $5,000 and $50,000, and not to exceed 50% of the facility’s annual energy expense. (Benchmark #1 is not provided in addition to the local government energy audit program incentive.)

2. Project Implementation – Upon installation of the recommended measures along with the “Substantial Completion Construction Report,” the incentive will grant savings per KWH or Therm based on the program’s rates. Minimum saving must be 15%. (Example $0.11 / kWh for 15% savings, $0.12/ kWh for 17% savings, … and $1.10 / Therm for 15% savings, $1.20 / Therm for 17% saving, …) Increased incentives result from projected savings above 15%.

3. Measurement and Verification – Upon verification 12 months after implementation of all recommended measures, that actual savings have been achieved, based on a completed verification report, the incentive will grant additional savings per kWh or Therm based on the program’s rates. Minimum savings must be 15%. (Example $0.07 / kWh for 15% savings, $0.08/ kWh for 17% savings, … and $0.70 / Therm for 15% savings, $0.80 / Therm for 17% saving, …) Increased incentives result from verified savings above 15%.

CEG recommends the BOE review the use of the above-listed funding options in addition to utilizing their standard method of financing for facilities upgrades in order to fund the proposed energy conservation measures.

Page 55: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 54 of 55

XI. ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations include no cost/low cost measures, Operation & Maintenance (O&M) items, and water conservation measures with attractive paybacks. These measures are not eligible for the Smart Start Buildings incentives from the office of Clean Energy but save energy none the less.

A. Chemically clean the condenser and evaporator coils periodically to optimize efficiency. Poorly maintained heat transfer surfaces can reduce efficiency 5-10%.

B. Maintain all weather stripping on windows and doors.

C. Clean all light fixtures to maximize light output in order to limit energy use from task lighting.

D. Provide more frequent air filter changes to decrease overall system power usage and maintain better IAQ.

E. Confirm that outside air economizers on the rooftop units are functioning properly to take advantage of free cooling and avoid excess outside air during occupied periods.

F. Seal openings around window unit penetrations to minimize outside air infiltration.

G. Turn off computer monitors and set computers to sleep when not being used. Computer monitors and computers are becoming one of the largest energy consumers in buildings today. Set computers to sleep when not being used and automatically turn off the computer monitors. Do not set computer monitors to “screen saver” mode which saves the screen life, not energy.

Page 56: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Pine Hill – Overbrook High School Energy Audit

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 9C09185 July 15, 2010 – FINAL Page 55 of 55

XII. ENERGY AUDIT ASSUMPTIONS The assumptions utilized in this energy audit include but are not limited to following:

A. Cost Estimates noted within this report are based on industry accepted costing data such as RS MeansTM Cost Data, contractor pricing and engineering estimates. All cost estimates for this level of auditing are +/- 20%. Prevailing wage rates for the specified region has been utilized to calculate installation costs. The cost estimates indicated within this audit should be utilized by the owner for prioritizing further project development post the energy audit. Project development would include investment grade auditing and detailed engineering.

B. Energy savings noted within this audit are calculated utilizing industry standard procedures and accepted engineering assumptions. For this level of auditing, energy savings are not guaranteed.

C. Information gathering for each facility is strongly based on interviews with operations personnel. Information dependent on verbal feedback is used for calculation assumptions including but not limited to the following:

a. operating hours b. equipment type c. control strategies d. scheduling

D. Information contained within the major equipment list is based on the existing owner

documentation where available (drawings, O&M manuals, etc.). If existing owner documentation is not available, catalog information is utilized to populate the required information.

E. Equipment incentives and energy credits are based on current pricing and status of incentive programs. Incentive availability is dependent on the individual program funding and applicability.

F. Equipment (HVAC, Plumbing, Electrical, & Lighting) noted within an ECM recommendation is strictly noted as a basis for calculation of energy savings. The owner should use this equipment information as a benchmark when pursuing further investment grade project development and detailed engineering for specific energy conservation measures.

G. Utility bill annual averages are utilized for calculation of all energy costs unless otherwise noted. Accuracy of the utility energy usage and costs are based on the information provided by the owner. Utility information including usage and costs is estimated where incomplete data is provided.

Page 57: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

APPENDIX A1 of 1

LIFETIME ENERGY SAVINGS

LIFETIME MAINTENANCE

SAVINGSLIFETIME ROI SIMPLE PAYBACK INTERNAL RATE OF

RETURN (IRR)NET PRESENT VALUE

(NPV)

MATERIAL LABOR REBATES, INCENTIVES

NET INSTALLATION

COSTENERGY MAINT. / SREC TOTAL (Yearly Saving * ECM Lifetime)

(Yearly Maint Svaing * ECM Lifetime)

(Lifetime Savings - Net Cost) / (Net Cost) (Net cost / Yearly Savings)

($) ($) ($) ($) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) ($/Yr) (Yr) ($) ($) (%) (Yr) ($) ($)

ECM #1 Computer Monitor Replacement $21,200 $0 $0 $21,200 $9,488 $0 $9,488 5 $47,440 $0 123.8% 2.2 34.64% $22,252.26

ECM #2 Condensing Boiler Installation $316,265 $246,005 $1,397 $560,873 $16,908 $0 $16,908 30 $507,240 $0 -9.6% 33.2 -0.64% ($229,468.74)

ECM #3 Pump VFD Retrofit $49,992 $24,996 $0 $74,988 $16,484 $0 $16,484 15 $247,260 $0 229.7% 4.5 20.67% $121,796.92

ECM #4 AC Rooftop Unit Replacement $16,129 $8,065 $1,369 $22,825 $1,253 $0 $1,253 15 $18,795 $0 -17.7% 18.2 -2.34% ($7,866.77)

ECM #5 Lighting Upgrade $6,725 $6,725 $1,100 $12,350 $6,244 $0 $6,244 15 $93,660 $0 658.4% 2.0 50.45% $62,190.47

ECM #6 Lighting Occupancy Sensors / Daylight Sensors $3,163 $3,163 $335 $5,990 $1,277 $0 $1,277 15 $19,155 $0 219.8% 4.7 19.92% $9,254.74

ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $10,746 $21,491 $0 $32,237 $4,547 $0 $4,547 15 $68,205 $0 111.6% 7.1 11.26% $22,045.19

REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $0 $0 $1,690,960 $38,217 $90,377 $128,594 25 $3,214,850 $2,259,425 90.1% 13.1 5.71% $548,266.31

Notes: 1) The variable Cn in the formulas for Internal Rate of Return and Net Present Value stands for the cash flow during each period.2) The variable DR in the NPV equation stands for Discount Rate3) For NPV and IRR calculations: From n=0 to N periods where N is the lifetime of ECM and Cn is the cash flow during each period .

REM RENEWABLE ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY

ECM COST & SAVINGS BREAKDOWNCONCORD ENGINEERING GROUP

Overbrook High School

INSTALLATION COST YEARLY SAVINGSECM

LIFETIMEDESCRIPTIONECM NO.

ECM ENERGY AND FINANCIAL COSTS AND SAVINGS SUMMARY

Page 58: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix B Page 1 of 3

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 520 BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NEW JERSEY 08043 PHONE: (856) 427-0200 FAX: (856) 427-6508

SmartStart Building Incentives The NJ SmartStart Buildings Program offers financial incentives on a wide variety of building system equipment. The incentives were developed to help offset the initial cost of energy-efficient equipment. The following tables show the current available incentives as of February, 2010:

Electric Chillers Water-Cooled Chillers $12 - $170 per ton

Air-Cooled Chillers $8 - $52 per ton Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2004

Gas Cooling Gas Absorption Chillers $185 - $400 per ton

Gas Engine-Driven Chillers Calculated through custom measure path)

Desiccant Systems $1.00 per cfm – gas or electric

Electric Unitary HVAC Unitary AC and Split Systems $73 - $93 per ton

Air-to-Air Heat Pumps $73 - $92 per ton Water-Source Heat Pumps $81 per ton

Packaged Terminal AC & HP $65 per ton Central DX AC Systems $40- $72 per ton

Dual Enthalpy Economizer Controls $250 Occupancy Controlled Thermostat

(Hospitality & Institutional Facility) $75 per thermostat

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2004

Ground Source Heat Pumps

Closed Loop & Open Loop $450 per ton, EER ≥ 16 $600 per ton, EER ≥ 18 $750 per ton, EER ≥ 20

Energy Efficiency must comply with ASHRAE 90.1-2004

Page 59: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix B Page 2 of 3

Gas Heating Gas Fired Boilers < 300 MBH $300 per unit

Gas Fired Boilers ≥ 300 - 1500 MBH $1.75 per MBH Gas Fired Boilers ≥1500 - ≤ 4000

MBH $1.00 per MBH

Gas Fired Boilers > 4000 MBH (Calculated through Custom Measure Path)

Gas Furnaces $300 - $400 per unit, AFUE ≥ 92%

Variable Frequency Drives

Variable Air Volume $65 - $155 per hp Chilled-Water Pumps $60 per hp

Compressors $5,250 to $12,500 per drive

Natural Gas Water Heating Gas Water Heaters ≤ 50 gallons $50 per unit

Gas-Fired Water Heaters > 50 gallons $1.00 - $2.00 per MBH Gas-Fired Booster Water Heaters $17 - $35 per MBH Gas Fired Tankless Water Heaters $300 per unit

Premium Motors

Three-Phase Motors $45 - $700 per motor Fractional HP Motors

Electronic Communicated Motors (replacing shaded pole motors in

refrigerator/freezer cases)

$40 per electronic communicated motor

Prescriptive Lighting

T-5 and T-8 Lamps w/Electronic Ballast in Existing Facilities

$15 per fixture (1-4 lamps)

T-8 reduced Wattage (28w/25w 4’, 1-4 lamps)

Lamp & ballast replacement $10 per fixture

Hard-Wired Compact Fluorescent $25 - $30 per fixture

Metal Halide w/Pulse Start $25 per fixture LED Exit Signs $10 - $20 per fixture

T-5 and T-8 High Bay Fixtures $16 - $284 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Retrofit with induction lamp, power coupler and generator

(must be 30% less watts/fixture than HID system)

$50 per fixture

HID ≥ 100w Replacement with new HID ≥ 100w $70 per fixture

LED Refrigerator/Freezer case lighting replacement of fluorescent in medium and low temperature display

case

$42 per 5 foot $65 per 6 foot

Page 60: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix B Page 3 of 3

Lighting Controls – Occupancy Sensors

Wall Mounted $20 per control Remote Mounted $35 per control Daylight Dimmers $25 per fixture

Occupancy Controlled hi-low Fluorescent Controls $25 per fixture controlled

Lighting Controls – HID or Fluorescent Hi-Bay Controls Occupancy hi-low $75 per fixture controlled Daylight Dimming $75 per fixture controlled

Daylight Dimming - office $50 per fixture controlled

Other Equipment Incentives

Performance Lighting

$1.00 per watt per SF below program incentive threshold, currently 5% more energy efficient than ASHRAE 90.1-

2004 for New Construction and Complete Renovation

Custom Electric and Gas Equipment Incentives not prescriptive

Custom Measures

$0.16 KWh and $1.60/Therm of 1st year savings, or a buy down to a 1 year

payback on estimated savings. Minimum required savings of 75,000 KWh or

1,500 Therms and a IRR of at least 10%. Multi Measures Bonus 15%

Page 61: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

OMB No. 2060-0347

STATEMENT OF ENERGY PERFORMANCEOverbrook High School

Building ID: 2302536 For 12-month Period Ending: February 28, 20101

Date SEP becomes ineligible: N/A Date SEP Generated: May 05, 2010

FacilityOverbrook High School1200 Turnersville RoadPine Hill, NJ 08021

Facility OwnerPine Hill BOE1003 Turnersville Road Pine Hill, NJ 08021

Primary Contact for this FacilityCarol Mascioli1003 Turnersville Rd Pine Hill, NJ 08021

Year Built: 1969Gross Floor Area (ft2): 160,000

Energy Performance Rating2 (1-100) 29

Site Energy Use Summary3

Electricity - Grid Purchase(kBtu) 5,442,004 Natural Gas (kBtu)4 8,167,643 Total Energy (kBtu) 13,609,647

Energy Intensity5 Site (kBtu/ft2/yr) 85 Source (kBtu/ft2/yr) 167 Emissions (based on site energy use) Greenhouse Gas Emissions (MtCO2e/year) 1,263 Electric Distribution Utility Pepco - Atlantic City Electric Co National Average Comparison National Average Site EUI 71 National Average Source EUI 139 % Difference from National Average Source EUI 20% Building Type K-12

School

Stamp of Certifying Professional

Based on the conditions observed at thetime of my visit to this building, I certify that

the information contained within thisstatement is accurate.

Meets Industry Standards6 for Indoor EnvironmentalConditions:Ventilation for Acceptable Indoor Air Quality N/A Acceptable Thermal Environmental Conditions N/A Adequate Illumination N/A

Certifying ProfessionalMichael Fischette520 South Burnt Mill Road Voorhees, NJ 08043

Notes: 1. Application for the ENERGY STAR must be submitted to EPA within 4 months of the Period Ending date. Award of the ENERGY STAR is not final until approval is received from EPA.2. The EPA Energy Performance Rating is based on total source energy. A rating of 75 is the minimum to be eligible for the ENERGY STAR.3. Values represent energy consumption, annualized to a 12-month period.4. Natural Gas values in units of volume (e.g. cubic feet) are converted to kBtu with adjustments made for elevation based on Facility zip code.5. Values represent energy intensity, annualized to a 12-month period.6. Based on Meeting ASHRAE Standard 62 for ventilation for acceptable indoor air quality, ASHRAE Standard 55 for thermal comfort, and IESNA Lighting Handbook for lighting quality.

The government estimates the average time needed to fill out this form is 6 hours (includes the time for entering energy data, PE facility inspection, and notarizing the SEP) and welcomessuggestions for reducing this level of effort. Send comments (referencing OMB control number) to the Director, Collection Strategies Division, U.S., EPA (2822T), 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW,Washington, D.C. 20460.

EPA Form 5900-16

Appendix CPage 1 of 7

Page 62: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

ENERGY STAR®

Data Checklistfor Commercial Buildings

In order for a building to qualify for the ENERGY STAR, a Professional Engineer (PE) must validate the accuracy of the data underlying the building's energyperformance rating. This checklist is designed to provide an at-a-glance summary of a property's physical and operating characteristics, as well as its total energyconsumption, to assist the PE in double-checking the information that the building owner or operator has entered into Portfolio Manager.

Please complete and sign this checklist and include it with the stamped, signed Statement of Energy Performance.NOTE: You must check each box to indicate that each value is correct, OR include a note.

CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED INPORTFOLIO MANAGER VERIFICATION QUESTIONS NOTES

Building Name Overbrook High School Is this the official building name to be displayed inthe ENERGY STAR Registry of LabeledBuildings?

Type K-12 School Is this an accurate description of the space inquestion?

Location 1200 Turnersville Road,

Pine Hill, NJ 08021 Is this address accurate and complete? Correctweather normalization requires an accurate zipcode.

Single Structure Single Facility

Does this SEP represent a single structure? SEPscannot be submitted for multiple-buildingcampuses (with the exception of acute care orchildren's hospitals) nor can they be submitted asrepresenting only a portion of a building

School (K-12 School)

CRITERION VALUE AS ENTERED INPORTFOLIO MANAGER VERIFICATION QUESTIONS NOTES

Gross Floor Area 160,000 Sq. Ft.

Does this square footage include all supportingfunctions such as kitchens and break rooms usedby staff, storage areas, administrative areas,elevators, stairwells, atria, vent shafts, etc. Alsonote that existing atriums should only include thebase floor area that it occupies. Interstitial(plenum) space between floors should not beincluded in the total. Finally gross floor area is notthe same as leasable space. Leasable space is asubset of gross floor area.

Open Weekends? No

Is this building normally open at all on theweekends? This includes activities beyond thework conducted by maintenance, cleaning, andsecurity personnel. Weekend activity could includeany time when the space is used for classes,performances or other school or communityactivities. If the building is open on the weekend aspart of the standard schedule during one or moreseasons, the building should select ?yes? for openweekends. The ?yes? response should applywhether the building is open for one or both of theweekend days.

Number of PCs 212 Is this the number of personal computers in theK12 School?

Number of walk-inrefrigeration/freezer

units 3

Is this the total number of commercial walk-in typefreezers and coolers? These units are typicallyfound in storage and receiving areas.

Presence ofcooking facilities Yes

Does this school have a dedicated space in whichfood is prepared and served to students? If theschool has space in which food for students is onlykept warm and/or served to students, or has only agalley that is used by teachers and staff then theanswer is "no".

Percent Cooled 30 % Is this the percentage of the total floor space withinthe facility that is served by mechanical coolingequipment?

Percent Heated 100 % Is this the percentage of the total floor space withinthe facility that is served by mechanical heatingequipment?

Months 11(Optional) Is this school in operation for at least 8 months ofthe year?

Page 1 of 4

Appendix CPage 2 of 7

Page 63: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

High School? Yes

Is this building a high school (teaching grades 10,11, and/or 12)? If the building teaches to highschool students at all, the user should check 'yes'to 'high school'. For example, if the school teachesto grades K-12 (elementary/middle and highschool), the user should check 'yes' to 'highschool'.

Page 2 of 4

Appendix CPage 3 of 7

Page 64: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

ENERGY STAR®

Data Checklistfor Commercial Buildings

Energy ConsumptionPower Generation Plant or Distribution Utility: Pepco - Atlantic City Electric Co

Fuel Type: Electricity

Meter: Electric (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))Space(s): Entire Facility

Generation Method: Grid Purchase

Start Date End Date Energy Use (kWh (thousand Watt-hours))

02/01/2010 02/28/2010 151,500.00

01/01/2010 01/31/2010 162,980.00

12/01/2009 12/31/2009 152,220.00

11/01/2009 11/30/2009 126,380.00

10/01/2009 10/31/2009 136,660.00

09/01/2009 09/30/2009 114,400.00

08/01/2009 08/31/2009 91,580.00

07/01/2009 07/31/2009 98,120.00

06/01/2009 06/30/2009 151,420.00

05/01/2009 05/31/2009 118,640.00

04/01/2009 04/30/2009 130,980.00

03/01/2009 03/31/2009 160,080.00

Electric Consumption (kWh (thousand Watt-hours)) 1,594,960.00

Electric Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 5,442,003.52

Total Electricity (Grid Purchase) Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 5,442,003.52

Is this the total Electricity (Grid Purchase) consumption at this building including allElectricity meters?

Fuel Type: Natural Gas

Meter: Gas (therms)Space(s): Entire Facility

Start Date End Date Energy Use (therms)

02/01/2010 02/28/2010 17,135.22

01/01/2010 01/31/2010 20,005.96

12/01/2009 12/31/2009 10,588.37

11/01/2009 11/30/2009 5,668.25

10/01/2009 10/31/2009 1,832.96

09/01/2009 09/30/2009 389.50

08/01/2009 08/31/2009 10.32

07/01/2009 07/31/2009 62.10

06/01/2009 06/30/2009 1,097.10

05/01/2009 05/31/2009 2,882.07

Page 3 of 4

Appendix CPage 4 of 7

Page 65: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

04/01/2009 04/30/2009 8,227.38

03/01/2009 03/31/2009 13,777.20

Gas Consumption (therms) 81,676.43

Gas Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 8,167,643.00

Total Natural Gas Consumption (kBtu (thousand Btu)) 8,167,643.00

Is this the total Natural Gas consumption at this building including all Natural Gas meters?

Additional FuelsDo the fuel consumption totals shown above represent the total energy use of this building?Please confirm there are no additional fuels (district energy, generator fuel oil) used in this facility.

On-Site Solar and Wind EnergyDo the fuel consumption totals shown above include all on-site solar and/or wind power located atyour facility? Please confirm that no on-site solar or wind installations have been omitted from thislist. All on-site systems must be reported.

Certifying Professional (When applying for the ENERGY STAR, the Certifying Professional must be the same as the PE that signed and stamped the SEP.)

Name: _____________________________________________ Date: _____________

Signature: ______________________________________ Signature is required when applying for the ENERGY STAR.

Page 4 of 4

Appendix CPage 5 of 7

Page 66: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

FOR YOUR RECORDS ONLY. DO NOT SUBMIT TO EPA.

Please keep this Facility Summary for your own records; do not submit it to EPA. Only the Statement of Energy Performance(SEP), Data Checklist and Letter of Agreement need to be submitted to EPA when applying for the ENERGY STAR.

FacilityOverbrook High School1200 Turnersville RoadPine Hill, NJ 08021

Facility OwnerPine Hill BOE1003 Turnersville Road Pine Hill, NJ 08021

Primary Contact for this FacilityCarol Mascioli1003 Turnersville Rd Pine Hill, NJ 08021

General InformationOverbrook High School

Gross Floor Area Excluding Parking: (ft2) 160,000 Year Built 1969 For 12-month Evaluation Period Ending Date: February 28, 2010

Facility Space Use SummarySchool

Space Type K-12 School

Gross Floor Area(ft2) 160,000

Open Weekends? No

Number of PCs 212

Number of walk-in refrigeration/freezerunits 3

Presence of cooking facilities Yes

Percent Cooled 30

Percent Heated 100

Monthso 11

High School? Yes

School Districto Pine Hill

Energy Performance ComparisonEvaluation Periods Comparisons

Performance Metrics Current(Ending Date 02/28/2010)

Baseline(Ending Date 02/28/2010) Rating of 75 Target National Average

Energy Performance Rating 29 29 75 N/A 50

Energy Intensity

Site (kBtu/ft2) 85 85 55 N/A 71

Source (kBtu/ft2) 167 167 109 N/A 139

Energy Cost

$/year N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

$/ft2/year N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A

Greenhouse Gas Emissions

MtCO2e/year 1,263 1,263 824 N/A 1,054

kgCO2e/ft2/year 8 8 5 N/A 7

More than 50% of your building is defined as K-12 School. Please note that your rating accounts for all of the spaces listed. The National Average column presentsenergy performance data your building would have if your building had an average rating of 50. Notes:o - This attribute is optional.d - A default value has been supplied by Portfolio Manager.

Appendix CPage 6 of 7

Page 67: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

2010Overbrook High School1200 Turnersville RoadPine Hill, NJ 08021

Portfolio Manager Building ID: 2302536

The energy use of this building has been measured and compared to other similar buildings using theEnvironmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) Energy Performance Scale of 1–100, with 1 being the least energyefficient and 100 the most energy efficient. For more information, visit energystar.gov/benchmark.

This building’sscore

29

100

Most Efficient

This building uses 167 kBtu per square foot per year.*

*Based on source energy intensity for the 12 month period ending February 2010

Date of certification

Date Generated: 05/05/2010

Statement ofEnergy Performance

1

Least Efficient

50

Average

Buildings with a score of75 or higher may qualifyfor EPA’s ENERGY STAR.

I certify that the information contained within this statement is accurate and in accordance with U.S.Environmental Protection Agency’s measurement standards, found at energystar.gov

Appendix CPage 7 of 7

Page 68: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix DPage 1of 8

BoilersTag Boiler-1 & 2

Unit Type Hot Water - Fire Tube

Qty 2

Location Bsmt Boiler Room

Area Served Whole Bldg

Manufacturer Cleaver Brooks

Model # CB266-400

Serial # L-46099 / L-46098

Input Capacity (GPH) 16,737 MBH

Rated Output Capacity (MBH) 12,887 MBH (Est)

Approx. Efficiency % 77%

Fuel Nat Gas

Approx Age 40

Ashrae Service Life 30

Remaining Life (10)

Comments One boiler - Retrofitted with new boiler controls

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Pine Hill - Overbrook High School

Page 69: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix DPage 2of 8

PumpsTag HWP-1 & 2

Unit Type Base Mounted - End Suction

Qty 2

Location Bsmt Boiler Room

Area Served Whole Bldg

Manufacturer Bell & Gossett

Model # P2500S-1767Z

Serial # N/A

Horse Power 40 HP

Flow 1254 GPM @ 84FT HD

Motor Info GE, 5KS3224AS205D20

Electrical Power 460V, 3PH

RPM 1780

Motor Efficiency % 94.5%

Approx Age N/A

Ashrae Service Life 20

Remaining Life

Comments Constant Speed, One motor replace, other motor Old - poor condition

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Pine Hill - Overbrook High School

Page 70: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix DPage 3of 8

PumpsTag Dom Booster

Unit Type Packaged Domestic Water Booster Pumps

Qty 1

Location Mechanical Room

Area Served Whole Building

Manufacturer Alyan Pump

Model # WVSPM-10065-3

Serial # 31571

Horse Power 3 HP (typ of two)

Flow 200 GPM @ 60FT HD

Motor Info N/A

Electrical Power 460V - 3PH

RPM N/A

Motor Efficiency % N/A

Approx Age 9

Ashrae Service Life 20

Remaining Life 11

Comments VFD Drives on both pump motors

Page 71: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix DPage 4of 8

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag AC-1 AC-2 RTU-3

Unit Type Cooling Only Split Sys CU

Elec Cooling Split Sys CU

Packaged DX Heat Pump

Qty 1 1 1

Location Roof Roof Roof

Area Served Maintenance Shop Computer Room Dark Room

Manufacturer Mitsubishi Electric Mammoth Lennox

Model # MUM18NW GS3BA-048DA CHP16-311-1P

Serial # 36902014C GSF040500752 5694F10509

Cooling Type Ductless Split System DX Split System DX Packaged DX Heat

Pump

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 1.5 Tons 4.0 Tons 1.5 Tons

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

10.0 SEER 10.0 SEER 9.0 EER

Heating Type None None None

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 15 N/A 16

Ashrae Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 0 N/A (1)

Comments

MAJOR EQUIPMENT LISTConcord Engineering Group

Pine Hill - Overbrook High School

Page 72: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix DPage 5of 8

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag AC-4 RTU-5 RTU-6

Unit Type Cooling Only Split Sys CU

Cooling Only Split Sys CU

Cooling Only Split Sys CU

Qty 1 1 1

Location Roof Roof Roof

Area Served Athletic Trainers Bus Garage Shop Gymnasium Work Out Room

Manufacturer NCP Airdale (Enviromaster Intl.)

International Comfort Products

Model # N/A SCC09DA00A0AA0A HAC06AKC4

Serial # N/A 1-00-B-9048-10 E040945482

Cooling Type Ductless Split System DX

Ductless Split System DX Split System DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 1.0 Ton (Est) 3/4 Ton 5 Ton

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

10.0 SEER (Est) 10.0 SEER 10.0 SEER (Est)

Heating Type None None None

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age N/A N/A N/A

Ashrae Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life N/A N/A N/A

Comments

Page 73: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix DPage 6of 8

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU-7 AC-8 AC-9

Unit Type Cooling Only Split Sys CU

Cooling Only Split Sys CU

Cooling Only Split Sys CU

Qty 1 1 1

Location 2nd Floor Wall Mnt Roof Roof

Area Served 2nd Floor Classroom Main Office Main Office

Manufacturer LG Trane Trane

Model # LMU365HV TTA120B400DA 2TTA0060A4000AA

Serial # 902KARW00054 2284H21AD 23062BC3F

Cooling Type Multi-Zone Ductless Split System DX Split System DX Split System DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 3.0 Ton (Est) 10 Tons 5 Tons

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

13 SEER 10.0 SEER 10.0 SEER

Heating Type None None None

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 1 8 8

Ashrae Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 14 7 7

Comments

Page 74: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix DPage 7of 8

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag RTU-10 AC-11 AC-12

Unit Type Packaged Gas Heat RTU

Cooling Only Split Sys CU

Cooling Only Split Sys CU

Qty 1 1 1

Location Roof Roof Roof

Area Served No Longer Used Main Office Child Study Offices

Manufacturer Trane EMI Trane

Model # GRCA35FSB N/A TTR060C100A2

Serial # 495A30244 N/A K16292538

Cooling Type None Split System DX Split System DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) N/A 1 Ton (Est) 5 Tons

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

N/A 10.0 SEER (Est) 10.0 SEER

Heating Type Gas Heat None None

Heating Input (MBH) 350 MBH N/A N/A

Efficiency 80% (Est) N/A N/A

Fuel Nat Gas N/A N/A

Approx Age 15 15 (Est) 15

Ashrae Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life 0 0 0

Comments

Page 75: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix DPage 8of 8

Rooftop / AC UnitsTag AC-13 AC-14 - 15 AC - 16

Unit Type Cooling Only Split Sys CU

Cooling Only Split Sys CU

Cooling Only Split Sys CU

Qty 1 2 1

Location Roof Exterior Wall Mnt Exterior Wall Mnt

Area Served Child Study Offices Faculty Lounge Faculty Louge

Manufacturer Trane LG LG

Model # TTJ760A100B0 LCU240CP LMU240CE

Serial # E31205588 701KASL00014, 701KAZK00013 N/A

Cooling Type Split Sys DX Split Sys DX Split Sys DX

Cooling Capacity (Tons) 5 Tons 2 Tons 2 Tons

Cooling Efficiency (SEER/EER)

8 SEER (Est) 13 SEER 13 SEER

Heating Type None None None

Heating Input (MBH) N/A N/A N/A

Efficiency N/A N/A N/A

Fuel N/A N/A N/A

Approx Age 20 1 1

Ashrae Service Life 15 15 15

Remaining Life (5) 14 14

Comments

Page 76: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix EPage 1 of 19

CEG Job #: 9C10005

Project: Overbrook High School KWH COST: $0.148

1200 Turnerville Road

Pine Hill, NJ 08021sq. ft.

ECM #5: Lighting Upgrade - GeneralEXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING SAVINGS

CEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Retro-Unit Watts Total kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Lamps Description Used kW Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.11 F136 - A.D. Office 2600 7 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

78 0.55 1,419.6 $210.10 7 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

800 2600 1 11x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal Lens, 100w

A19 Lamp100 0.10 260.0 $38.48 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 67.6 $10.00 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 192.4 $28.48 0.70

801 2600 1 2 Wall Mnt. Vanity Light, (2) 60w A19 Lamps 120 0.12 312.0 $46.18 1 2 (2) 13w CFL Lamps 26 0.03 67.6 $10.00 $30.00 $30.00 0.09 244.4 $36.17 0.83

222.21 F135 - Medical 2600 6 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.35 904.8 $133.91 6 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 F143 - Equipment Storage 2600 11 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens86 0.95 2,459.6 $364.02 11 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Corridor "F" 3600 18 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 1.04 3,758.4 $556.24 18 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.12 301.6 $44.64 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 2600 33 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

104 3.43 8,923.2 $1,320.63 33 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 2600 2 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.12 301.6 $44.64 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 F101 - Gym Office 2600 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.17 452.4 $66.96 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

800 F103 - Gym Office Restroom 800 1 1

1x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal Lens, 100w

A19 Lamp100 0.10 80.0 $11.84 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 20.8 $3.08 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 59.2 $8.76 2.28

800 Boy's Showers 800 6 11x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal Lens, 100w

A19 Lamp100 0.60 480.0 $71.04 6 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.16 124.8 $18.47 $20.00 $120.00 0.44 355.2 $52.57 2.28

227.12 F108 - Restroom 800 3 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.17 139.2 $20.60 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

800 800 1 11x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal Lens, 100w

A19 Lamp100 0.10 80.0 $11.84 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 20.8 $3.08 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 59.2 $8.76 2.28

801 800 1 2 Wall Mnt. Vanity Light, (2) 60w A19 Lamps 120 0.12 96.0 $14.21 1 2 (2) 13w CFL Lamps 26 0.03 20.8 $3.08 $30.00 $30.00 0.09 75.2 $11.13 2.70

232.21 800 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.17 137.6 $20.36 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 F133 - Weight Room 2600 24 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens86 2.06 5,366.4 $794.23 24 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 F133 - Weight Room 2600 8 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens86 0.69 1,788.8 $264.74 8 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

F138 - Restroom

F111 - Locker Room/Shower

F102 Boy's Locker Room

Overbrook High School

160,000

Page 77: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix EPage 2 of 19

803 F131 - Equipment Storage 800 2 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface

Mnt., No Lens 28 0.06 44.8 $6.63 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.21 F128 - Girl's Locker Room 2600 30 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens58 1.74 4,524.0 $669.55 30 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.22 F117 - Locker Room 2600 8 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Parabolic Lens58 0.46 1,206.4 $178.55 8 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.11 F120 - Locker Room/ Restroom 2600 3 2

6"x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., White

Diffuser58 0.17 452.4 $66.96 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

800 Girl's Shower 800 8 11x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal Lens, 100w

A19 Lamp100 0.80 640.0 $94.72 8 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.21 166.4 $24.63 $20.00 $160.00 0.59 473.6 $70.09 2.28

800 F140 - Storage 800 2 11x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal Lens, 100w

A19 Lamp100 0.20 160.0 $23.68 2 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.05 41.6 $6.16 $20.00 $40.00 0.15 118.4 $17.52 2.28

800 F141 - Storage 800 2 11x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal Lens, 100w

A19 Lamp100 0.20 160.0 $23.68 2 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.05 41.6 $6.16 $20.00 $40.00 0.15 118.4 $17.52 2.28

222.21 F127 - Gym Office 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.12 301.6 $44.64 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

801 2600 1 2 Wall Mnt. Vanity Light, (2) 60w A19 Lamps 120 0.12 312.0 $46.18 1 2 (2) 13w CFL Lamps 26 0.03 67.6 $10.00 $30.00 $30.00 0.09 244.4 $36.17 0.83

800 2600 1 11x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal Lens, 100w

A19 Lamp100 0.10 260.0 $38.48 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 67.6 $10.00 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 192.4 $28.48 0.70

221.11 F128 - Corridor 3600 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.23 835.2 $123.61 4 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 F129 - Classroom 2600 10 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

104 1.04 2,704.0 $400.19 10 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.32 D135 - Art 2600 69 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 4.00 10,405.2 $1,539.97 69 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.32 D131 - Printing 2600 69 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 4.00 10,405.2 $1,539.97 69 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 D104 - General Storage 800 4 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface

Mnt., No Lens 28 0.11 89.6 $13.26 4 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.32 D105 - Photo Shop 2600 24 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 1.39 3,619.2 $535.64 24 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 D113 - Corridor 3600 5 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.29 1,044.0 $154.51 5 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Corridor "D" 3600 28 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 1.62 5,846.4 $865.27 28 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

802 D124 - Women's Restroom 2600 6 1

6"x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt.,

Prismatic Diffuser28 0.17 436.8 $64.65 6 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 D115 Custodial Closet 800 1 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface

Mnt., No Lens 28 0.03 22.4 $3.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

802 Men's Restroom 2600 6 16"x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Diffuser

28 0.17 436.8 $64.65 6 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.22 D127 - Building Trades 2600 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Parabolic Lens58 0.00 0.0 $0.00 0 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

F126-Restroom

Page 78: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix EPage 3 of 19

221.22 D127B - Storage 800 18 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 1.04 835.2 $123.61 18 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 D122 - Office 2600 6 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.35 904.8 $133.91 6 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 D125 - Automotive Shop 2600 72 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens58 4.18 10,857.6 $1,606.92 72 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 D125 - Automotive Shop Locker 2600 4 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens58 0.23 603.2 $89.27 4 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.22 D121 - Electric Shop 2600 60 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Parabolic Lens58 3.48 9,048.0 $1,339.10 60 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 2600 16 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

104 1.66 4,326.4 $640.31 16 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

247.21 2600 3 42x2, 4 Lamp, 17w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

60 0.18 468.0 $69.26 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

770 Gym 3000 44 1 400w MH LoBay, Prismatic Lens 465 20.46 61,380.0 $9,084.24 44 4 2x4 54w T5HO 4 Lamp

w/Reflective Lens, Wire Cage 236 10.38 31152 $4,610.50 $240.00 $10,560.00 10.08 30228 $4,473.74 2.36

222.21 3600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.70 2,505.6 $370.83 12 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

601 8760 1 2 (2) 7w CFL Exit Sign 16 0.02 140.2 $20.74 1 1 LED Exit Sign 5 0.01 43.8 $6.48 $65.00 $65.00 0.01 96.36 $14.26 4.56

221.11 E102 - Women's Restroom 2600 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens58 0.17 452.4 $66.96 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 E103 - Custodial Closet 800 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens58 0.06 46.4 $6.87 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 E104 - Men's Restroom 2600 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens58 0.17 452.4 $66.96 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 E113 - Weight Room 2600 12 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens86 1.03 2,683.2 $397.11 12 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 D100 - Corridor 3600 8 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., 58 0.46 1,670.4 $247.22 8 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 C110 Electrical Equipment 800 2 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface

Mnt., No Lens 28 0.06 44.8 $6.63 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 C109 Supply Closet 800 2 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface

Mnt., No Lens 28 0.06 44.8 $6.63 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21C111 -

Office/Conference Room

2600 7 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.60 1,565.2 $231.65 7 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 C106 - Facility Dining 2600 21 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens104 2.18 5,678.4 $840.40 21 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 2600 2 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

104 0.21 540.8 $80.04 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

247.21 2600 1 42x2, 4 Lamp, 17w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

60 0.06 156.0 $23.09 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 2600 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

104 0.00 0.0 $0.00 0 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

247.21 2600 42x2, 4 Lamp, 17w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

60 0.00 0.0 $0.00 0 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

D117 - Art

Gym Lobby

C113 - Men's Restroom

C112 - Women's Restroom

Page 79: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix EPage 4 of 19

242.21 2600 24 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

104 2.50 6,489.6 $960.46 24 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.16 2600 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Acrylic Lens

58 0.23 603.2 $89.27 4 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

617 Kitchen Hood 2600 10 1 Hood Light w/Globe & Cage, 100w A19 Lamp 100 1.00 2,600.0 $384.80 10 1 (1) 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.26 676 $100.05 $20.00 $200.00 0.74 1924 $284.75 0.70

242.21 C116 - Kitchen Office 2600 2 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens104 0.21 540.8 $80.04 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.21 C120 - Restroom 800 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Acrylic Lens

58 0.06 46.4 $6.87 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 C105 Custodial Closet 800 2 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface

Mnt., No Lens 28 0.06 44.8 $6.63 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.21 E123 - Office 2600 8 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Acrylic Lens

58 0.46 1,206.4 $178.55 8 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 E122 - Girl's Restroom 2600 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens58 0.17 452.4 $66.96 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 E121 Custodial Closet 800 1 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface

Mnt., No Lens 28 0.03 22.4 $3.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 E120 - Boy's Restroom 2600 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens58 0.17 452.4 $66.96 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Corridor "E" 3600 68 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 3.94 14,198.4 $2,101.36 68 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Corridor "E 106" 3600 18 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 1.04 3,758.4 $556.24 18 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 E119 - Office 2600 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.23 603.2 $89.27 4 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.32 E117 - Choral Room 2600 23 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,

Parabolic Lens58 1.33 3,468.4 $513.32 23 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 F115 - Storage 800 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.12 92.8 $13.73 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 E114 - Classroom 2600 10 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.58 1,508.0 $223.18 10 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 E108 - Band Storage 800 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens58 0.12 92.8 $13.73 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.32 E107 - Band Room 2600 33 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 1.91 4,976.4 $736.51 33 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

241.11 E112 - Band Offices 2600 3 4

1x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens104 0.31 811.2 $120.06 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 E105 - Storage 800 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.23 185.6 $27.47 4 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 E129 - Auditorium 2600 43 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

104 4.47 11,627.2 $1,720.83 43 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

800 Auditorium Side Entrance 2600 6 1

1x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal Lens, 100w

A19 Lamp100 0.60 1,560.0 $230.88 6 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.16 405.6 $60.03 $20.00 $120.00 0.44 1154.4 $170.85 0.70

C108 - Kitchen

Page 80: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix EPage 5 of 19

221.14 Stage 2600 21 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 1.22 3,166.8 $468.69 21 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

128.14 Maintenance Garage 4200 8 2

8' Channel, 2 Lamp, 75w T12, Mag. Ballast, Surface

Mnt., No Lens142 1.14 4,771.2 $706.14 8 4 (2) 8' Lamps to (4) 4' Lamps -

32w T8, Elect Ballast; retrofit 104 0.83 3494.4 $517.17 $100.00 $800.00 0.30 1276.8 $188.97 4.23

221.44 E125 - Men's Dressing Room 800 4 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Clear

Acrylic Lens58 0.23 185.6 $27.47 4 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

801 E125 - Men's Dressing Restroom 800 1 2 Wall Mnt. Vanity Light, (2)

60w A19 Lamps 120 0.12 96.0 $14.21 1 2 (2) 13w CFL Lamps 26 0.03 20.8 $3.08 $30.00 $30.00 0.09 75.2 $11.13 2.70

221.44 E128 - Women Dressing Room 800 4 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Clear

Acrylic Lens58 0.23 185.6 $27.47 4 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

801 E128 - Women Dressing Restroom 800 1 2 Wall Mnt. Vanity Light, (2)

60w A19 Lamps 120 0.12 96.0 $14.21 1 2 (2) 13w CFL Lamps 26 0.03 20.8 $3.08 $30.00 $30.00 0.09 75.2 $11.13 2.70

221.11 E130 - Electrical Room 800 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens58 0.17 139.2 $20.60 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

802 Corridor "A102" 3600 11 16"x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Diffuser

28 0.31 1,108.8 $164.10 11 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 A106 - Office 2600 6 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.35 904.8 $133.91 6 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 2600 30 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 2.58 6,708.0 $992.78 30 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

802 2600 32 16"x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Diffuser

28 0.90 2,329.6 $344.78 32 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.21 Library Office 2600 6 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Acrylic Lens

58 0.35 904.8 $133.91 6 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.21 A110 - Book Storage 2600 10 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt.,

Acrylic Lens58 0.58 1,508.0 $223.18 10 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 A100 - Entrance 3600 9 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

104 0.94 3,369.6 $498.70 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.21 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Acrylic Lens

58 0.70 1,809.6 $267.82 12 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

802 2600 16 16"x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Diffuser

28 0.45 1,164.8 $172.39 16 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

801 Women's Restroom 800 1 2 Wall Mnt. Vanity Light, (2) 60w A19 Lamps 120 0.12 96.0 $14.21 1 2 (2) 13w CFL Lamps 26 0.03 20.8 $3.08 $30.00 $30.00 0.09 75.2 $11.13 2.70

801 Men's Restroom 800 1 2 Wall Mnt. Vanity Light, (2) 60w A19 Lamps 120 0.12 96.0 $14.21 1 2 (2) 13w CFL Lamps 26 0.03 20.8 $3.08 $30.00 $30.00 0.09 75.2 $11.13 2.70

613 A132 Custodial Closet 800 1 "Keyless" Socket, 100w A19

Lamp 100 0.00 0.0 $0.00 0 1 (1) 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.00 0 $0.00 $20.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

801 800 1 2 Wall Mnt. Vanity Light, (2) 60w A19 Lamps 120 0.12 96.0 $14.21 1 2 (2) 13w CFL Lamps 26 0.03 20.8 $3.08 $30.00 $30.00 0.09 75.2 $11.13 2.70

800 800 1 11x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal Lens, 100w

A19 Lamp100 0.10 80.0 $11.84 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 20.8 $3.08 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 59.2 $8.76 2.28

242.21 A148 - Assistant Principal Office 2600 3 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens104 0.31 811.2 $120.06 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

801 800 1 2 Wall Mnt. Vanity Light, (2) 60w A19 Lamps 120 0.12 96.0 $14.21 1 2 (2) 13w CFL Lamps 26 0.03 20.8 $3.08 $30.00 $30.00 0.09 75.2 $11.13 2.70

A1041 - Library

A133 - Women's Restroom

A134 Men's

Main Office

Page 81: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix EPage 6 of 19

800 800 1 11x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal Lens, 100w

A19 Lamp100 0.10 80.0 $11.84 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 20.8 $3.08 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 59.2 $8.76 2.28

242.21 A144 - Conference Room 2600 2 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens104 0.21 540.8 $80.04 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 A143 - Office 2600 2 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

104 0.21 540.8 $80.04 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 A140 - Principal Office 2600 3 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens104 0.31 811.2 $120.06 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 B102 - Classroom 2600 9 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.77 2,012.4 $297.84 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 B101 - Classroom 2600 9 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.77 2,012.4 $297.84 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B100 - Special Services 2600 18 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens58 1.04 2,714.4 $401.73 18 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.32 B105 - Computer Lab 2600 15 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,

Parabolic Lens58 0.87 2,262.0 $334.78 15 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.22 B104 - Computer Lab 2600 12 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Parabolic Lens104 1.25 3,244.8 $480.23 12 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.22 B103 - Computer Lab 2600 15 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Parabolic Lens104 1.56 4,056.0 $600.29 15 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Corridor "A" 3600 44 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 2.55 9,187.2 $1,359.71 44 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 B107 - Custodial Closet 800 1 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface

Mnt., No Lens 28 0.03 22.4 $3.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 B108 - Custodial Closet 800 1 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface

Mnt., No Lens 28 0.03 22.4 $3.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.21 B109 - Child Study Team 2600 14 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens104 1.46 3,785.6 $560.27 14 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 B110 - Classroom 2600 22 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.89 4,919.2 $728.04 22 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.22 B113 - Computer Lab 2600 9 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Parabolic Lens86 0.77 2,012.4 $297.84 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.22 B112 - Computer Lab 2600 9 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Parabolic Lens86 0.77 2,012.4 $297.84 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.22 B111 - Classroom 2600 9 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 0.77 2,012.4 $297.84 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.16 B115 - Girl's Restroom 2600 13 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt.,

Acrylic Lens58 0.75 1,960.4 $290.14 13 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 Electrical Closet 800 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.06 46.4 $6.87 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 B106A - Elevator Control 800 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens58 0.17 139.2 $20.60 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.12 B139 - Classroom 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.70 1,809.6 $267.82 12 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

A134 - Men s Restroom

Page 82: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix EPage 7 of 19

222.21 B138 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B137 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B136 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B135 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B134 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B133 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B132 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

802 B122 - Corridor 3600 32 16"x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Diffuser

28 0.90 3,225.6 $477.39 32 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 B117 - Electrical Closet 800 1 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface

Mnt., No Lens 28 0.03 22.4 $3.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

802 B116 - Boy's Restroom 2600 16 1

6"x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt.,

Prismatic Diffuser28 0.45 1,164.8 $172.39 16 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B120 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B125 - Classroom 2600 13 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.75 1,960.4 $290.14 13 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 B121 - Storage 800 5 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface Mnt., No Lens 28 0.14 112.0 $16.58 5 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B123 - Classroom 2600 13 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.75 1,960.4 $290.14 13 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 B126 - Storage 800 5 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface Mnt., No Lens 28 0.14 112.0 $16.58 5 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B128 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B129 - News Room 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens58 0.23 603.2 $89.27 4 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 B130 - Custodial Closet 800 1 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface

Mnt., No Lens 28 0.03 22.4 $3.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 B131 - Custodial Closet 800 1 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface

Mnt., No Lens 28 0.03 22.4 $3.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

802 B105 - Corridor 3600 32 16"x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Diffuser

28 0.90 3,225.6 $477.39 32 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 C100 - Cafeteria 2600 70 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 4.06 10,556.0 $1,562.29 70 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

111.14 Lobby Display Cases 3600 8 1

1x4, 1-Lamp, 34w T12, Mag. Ballast, Surface Mnt., No

Lens48 0.38 1,382.4 $204.60 8 1 1 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast;

retrofit 30 0.24 864 $127.87 $80.00 $640.00 0.14 518.4 $76.72 8.34

Page 83: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix EPage 8 of 19

552 Gym Lobby Exterior 2600 7 2

1x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal Lens, (2)

100w A19 Lamp200 1.40 3,640.0 $538.72 7 2 (2) 26w CFL Lamp 62 0.43 1128.4 $167.00 $30.00 $210.00 0.97 2511.6 $371.72 0.56

552 Front Lobby Exterior 2600 4 2

1x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal Lens, (2)

100w A19 Lamp200 0.80 2,080.0 $307.84 4 2 (2) 26w CFL Lamp 62 0.25 644.8 $95.43 $30.00 $120.00 0.55 1435.2 $212.41 0.56

221.11 A200 - Classroom 2600 30 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 1.74 4,524.0 $669.55 30 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 A213 - Classroom 2600 9 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.77 2,012.4 $297.84 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 A212 - Classroom 2600 9 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.77 2,012.4 $297.84 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 A211 - Classroom 2600 9 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.77 2,012.4 $297.84 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 A210 - Classroom 2600 9 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.77 2,012.4 $297.84 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 2600 27 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 1.57 4,071.6 $602.60 27 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 2600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 670.8 $99.28 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 2600 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.12 301.6 $44.64 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

800 2600 1 11x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal Lens, 100w

A19 Lamp100 0.10 260.0 $38.48 1 1 26w CFL Lamp 26 0.03 67.6 $10.00 $20.00 $20.00 0.07 192.4 $28.48 0.70

801 2600 1 2 Wall Mnt. Vanity Light, (2) 60w A19 Lamps 120 0.12 312.0 $46.18 1 2 (2) 13w CFL Lamps 26 0.03 67.6 $10.00 $30.00 $30.00 0.09 244.4 $36.17 0.83

803 A205 Closet 800 1 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface Mnt., No Lens 28 0.03 22.4 $3.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

802 A206 - Corridor 3600 16 16"x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Diffuser

28 0.45 1,612.8 $238.69 16 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 A207 - Corridor 3600 33 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 1.91 6,890.4 $1,019.78 33 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 BS 1 - Stairwell 3600 6 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.35 1,252.8 $185.41 6 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.32 School Store 2600 14 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.81 2,111.2 $312.46 14 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.32 B202 - Classroom 2600 18 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 1.04 2,714.4 $401.73 18 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.32 B201 - Classroom 2600 18 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 1.04 2,714.4 $401.73 18 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.32 B200 - Classroom 2600 15 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.87 2,262.0 $334.78 15 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.11 BS 5 - Stairwell 3600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 928.8 $137.46 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.11 BS 4 - Stairwell 3600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 928.8 $137.46 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

A208 - Classroom

A207 - Girls Lockroom/ Restroom

Page 84: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix EPage 9 of 19

221.32 B205B - Classroom 2600 18 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 1.04 2,714.4 $401.73 18 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.32 B205A - Classroom 2600 18 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,

Parabolic Lens58 1.04 2,714.4 $401.73 18 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.32 B204B - Classroom 2600 18 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 1.04 2,714.4 $401.73 18 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.32 B204A - Classroom 2600 18 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,

Parabolic Lens58 1.04 2,714.4 $401.73 18 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

802 B206 - Corridor 3600 32 16"x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Diffuser

28 0.90 3,225.6 $477.39 32 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 B209 - Custodial Closet 800 1 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface

Mnt., No Lens 28 0.03 22.4 $3.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 B207 - Custodial Closet 800 1 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface

Mnt., No Lens 28 0.03 22.4 $3.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 B210 - Book Storage 2600 5 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface

Mnt., No Lens 28 0.14 364.0 $53.87 5 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B211 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B212 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B213 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

247.21 3600 2 42x2, 4 Lamp, 17w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

60 0.12 432.0 $63.94 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 3600 1 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.06 208.8 $30.90 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.11 3600 1 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.06 208.8 $30.90 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 B214 - Classroom 2600 24 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 2.06 5,366.4 $794.23 24 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 B214 - Classroom 2600 12 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.03 2,683.2 $397.11 12 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.16 B218 - Girl's Restroom 2600 13 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt.,

Acrylic Lens58 0.75 1,960.4 $290.14 13 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 B217 - Electrical Closet 800 2 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface

Mnt., No Lens 28 0.06 44.8 $6.63 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.11 B207A - Restroom 2600 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.12 301.6 $44.64 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B216 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B225 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B229 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

BS31 - Stairwell

Page 85: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix EPage 10 of 19

222.21 B239 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.11 BS 6 - Stairwell 3600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 928.8 $137.46 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B237 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B236 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B235 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B234 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

802 B230 - Corridor 3600 32 16"x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Diffuser

28 0.90 3,225.6 $477.39 32 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.21 BS 2 - Stairwell 3600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 928.8 $137.46 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 B220 - Custodial Closet 800 2 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface

Mnt., No Lens 28 0.06 44.8 $6.63 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.16 B219 - Boy's Restroom 2600 13 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt.,

Acrylic Lens58 0.75 1,960.4 $290.14 13 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B223 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B226 - Classroom 2600 14 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.81 2,111.2 $312.46 14 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 BS 4 - Stairwell 3600 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.17 626.4 $92.71 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B227 - Classroom 2600 14 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.81 2,111.2 $312.46 14 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 B228 - Storage 800 5 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface Mnt., No Lens 28 0.14 112.0 $16.58 5 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B230 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.52 1,357.2 $200.87 9 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.21 B231 - Book Storage 2600 4 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens58 0.23 603.2 $89.27 4 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 B232 - Custodial Closet 800 1 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface

Mnt., No Lens 28 0.03 22.4 $3.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 B233 - Custodial Closet 800 1 1 4' Channel, 32w T8, Surface

Mnt., No Lens 28 0.03 22.4 $3.32 1 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.11 AS 1 - Stairwell 3600 3 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.26 928.8 $137.46 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Boiler Room 4160 16 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.93 3,860.5 $571.35 16 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Maintenance Office 4160 11 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens58 0.64 2,654.1 $392.80 11 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Page 86: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Investment Grade Lighting Audit Appendix EPage 11 of 19

221.31 Maintenance Storage 4160 39 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt.,

Prismatic Lens58 2.26 9,409.9 $1,392.67 39 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.31 Maintenance Shop 4160 20 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect.

Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 1.16 4,825.6 $714.19 20 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

766 4160 3 1 400w MH Flood 465 1.40 5,803.2 $858.87 3 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00767 4160 24 1 400w MH Wallpack 465 11.16 46,425.6 $6,870.99 24 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00760 4160 8 1 400w HPS "Shoebox" 465 3.72 15,475.2 $2,290.33 8 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00790 4160 2 1 1000w HPS Flood 1100 2.20 9,152.0 $1,354.50 2 0 No Change 0 0.00 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Totals 2419 187.65 543,345 $80,415 2419 13.5 39418 $5,834 $1,125 $13,515 16.0 42284 $6,258 2.16

Exterior

Page 87: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix EPage 12 of 19

CEG Job #: 9C10005

Project: Overbrook High School KWH COST: $0.148Address: 1200 Turnerville Road

Pine Hill, NJ 08021Building SF:

ECM #6: Lighting Controls

EXISTING LIGHTING PROPOSED LIGHTING CONTROLS SAVINGSCEG Fixture Yearly No. No. Fixture Fixt Total kWh/Yr Yearly No. No. Controls Watts Total Reduction kWh/Yr Yearly Unit Cost Total kW kWh/Yr Yearly Yearly SimpleType Location Usage Fixts Lamps Type Watts kW Fixtures $ Cost Fixts Cont. Description Used kW (%) Fixtures $ Cost (INSTALLED) Cost Savings Savings $ Savings Payback

221.1 F136 - A.D. Office 2600 7 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

78 0.546 1419.6 210.1008 7 0 None 78 0.55 0% 1419.6 $210.10 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

800 2600 1 11x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal

Lens, 100w A19 Lamp100 0.1 260 38.48 1 0 None 100 0.10 0% 260 $38.48 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

801 2600 1 2 Wall Mnt. Vanity Light, (2) 60w A19 Lamps 120 0.12 312 46.176 1 0 None 120 0.12 0% 312 $46.18 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.2 F135 - Medical 2600 6 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.348 904.8 133.9104 6 0 None 58 0.35 0% 904.8 $133.91 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.2 F143 - Equipment Storage 2600 11 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens86 0.946 2459.6 364.0208 11 0 None 86 0.95 0% 2459.6 $364.02 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 Corridor "F" 3600 18 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 1.044 3758.4 556.2432 18 0 None 58 1.04 0% 3758.4 $556.24 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.2 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.116 301.6 44.6368 2 0 None 58 0.12 0% 301.6 $44.64 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.2 2600 33 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

104 3.432 8923.2 1320.634 33 0 None 104 3.43 0% 8923.2 $1,320.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.2 2600 2 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.116 301.6 44.6368 2 0 None 58 0.12 0% 301.6 $44.64 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.2 F101 - Gym Office 2600 3 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.174 452.4 66.9552 3 0 None 58 0.17 0% 452.4 $66.96 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

800 F103 - Gym Office Restroom 800 1 1

1x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal

Lens, 100w A19 Lamp100 0.1 80 11.84 1 0 None 100 0.10 0% 80 $11.84 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

800 Boy's Showers 800 6 11x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal

Lens, 100w A19 Lamp100 0.6 480 71.04 6 0 None 100 0.60 0% 480 $71.04 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.1 F108 - Restroom 800 3 22x2, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.174 139.2 20.6016 3 0 None 58 0.17 0% 139.2 $20.60 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

800 800 1 11x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal

Lens, 100w A19 Lamp100 0.1 80 11.84 1 0 None 100 0.10 0% 80 $11.84 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

801 800 1 2 Wall Mnt. Vanity Light, (2) 60w A19 Lamps 120 0.12 96 14.208 1 0 None 120 0.12 0% 96 $14.21 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Overbrook High School

F111 - Locker Room/Shower

160000

F138 - Restroom

F102 Boy's Locker Room

Page 88: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix EPage 13 of 19

232.2 800 2 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.172 137.6 20.3648 2 0 None 86 0.17 0% 137.6 $20.36 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.2 F133 - Weight Room 2600 24 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens86 2.064 5366.4 794.2272 24 2 Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor 86 1.65 20% 4293.12 $635.38 $160.00 $320.00 0.41 1073.28 $158.85 2.01

232.2 F133 - Weight Room 2600 8 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens86 0.688 1788.8 264.7424 8 1

Daylight Sensor (Sensorswitch PP-20 &

CM-PC or equal)86 0.55 20% 1431.04 $211.79 $280.00 $280.00 0.14 357.76 $52.95 5.29

803 F131 - Equipment Storage 800 2 1 4' Channel, 32w T8,

Surface Mnt., No Lens 28 0.056 44.8 6.6304 2 0 None 28 0.06 0% 44.8 $6.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.2 F128 - Girl's Locker Room 2600 30 2

2x2, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens58 1.74 4524 669.552 30 0 None 58 1.74 0% 4524 $669.55 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.2 F117 - Locker Room 2600 8 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Parabolic Lens58 0.464 1206.4 178.5472 8 0 None 58 0.46 0% 1206.4 $178.55 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

227.1 F120 - Locker Room/ Restroom 2600 3 2

6"x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Wall Mnt., White Diffuser

58 0.174 452.4 66.9552 3 0 None 58 0.17 0% 452.4 $66.96 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

800 Girl's Shower 800 8 11x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal

Lens, 100w A19 Lamp100 0.8 640 94.72 8 0 None 100 0.80 0% 640 $94.72 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

800 F140 - Storage 800 2 11x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal

Lens, 100w A19 Lamp100 0.2 160 23.68 2 0 None 100 0.20 0% 160 $23.68 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

800 F141 - Storage 800 2 11x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal

Lens, 100w A19 Lamp100 0.2 160 23.68 2 0 None 100 0.20 0% 160 $23.68 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.2 F127 - Gym Office 2600 2 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.116 301.6 44.6368 2 0 None 58 0.12 0% 301.6 $44.64 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

801 2600 1 2 Wall Mnt. Vanity Light, (2) 60w A19 Lamps 120 0.12 312 46.176 1 0 None 120 0.12 0% 312 $46.18 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

800 2600 1 11x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal

Lens, 100w A19 Lamp100 0.1 260 38.48 1 0 None 100 0.10 0% 260 $38.48 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 F128 - Corridor 3600 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.232 835.2 123.6096 4 0 None 58 0.23 0% 835.2 $123.61 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.2 F129 - Classroom 2600 10 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

104 1.04 2704 400.192 10 0 None 104 1.04 0% 2704 $400.19 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.3 D135 - Art 2600 69 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 4.002 10405.2 1539.97 69 0 None 58 4.00 0% 10405.2 $1,539.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.3 D131 - Printing 2600 69 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 4.002 10405.2 1539.97 69 0 None 58 4.00 0% 10405.2 $1,539.97 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 D104 - General Storage 800 4 1 4' Channel, 32w T8,

Surface Mnt., No Lens 28 0.112 89.6 13.2608 4 0 None 28 0.11 0% 89.6 $13.26 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.3 D105 - Photo Shop 2600 24 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 1.392 3619.2 535.6416 24 0 None 58 1.39 0% 3619.2 $535.64 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

F126-Restroom

Page 89: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix EPage 14 of 19

222.2 D113 - Corridor 3600 5 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.29 1044 154.512 5 1Daylight Sensor

(Sensorswitch PP-20 & CM-PC or equal)

58 0.23 20% 835.2 $123.61 $280.00 $280.00 0.06 208.8 $30.90 9.06

221.1 Corridor "D" 3600 28 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 1.624 5846.4 865.2672 28 0 None 58 1.62 0% 5846.4 $865.27 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

802 D124 - Women's Restroom 2600 6 1

6"x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface

Mnt., Prismatic Diffuser28 0.168 436.8 64.6464 6 0 None 28 0.17 0% 436.8 $64.65 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 D115 Custodial Closet 800 1 1 4' Channel, 32w T8,

Surface Mnt., No Lens 28 0.028 22.4 3.3152 1 0 None 28 0.03 0% 22.4 $3.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

802 Men's Restroom 2600 6 16"x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface

Mnt., Prismatic Diffuser28 0.168 436.8 64.6464 6 0 None 28 0.17 0% 436.8 $64.65 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.2 D127 - Building Trades 2600 0 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Parabolic Lens58 0 0 0 0 0 None 58 0.00 0% 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.2 D127B - Storage 800 18 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 1.044 835.2 123.6096 18 0 None 58 1.04 0% 835.2 $123.61 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 D122 - Office 2600 6 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.348 904.8 133.9104 6 0 None 58 0.35 0% 904.8 $133.91 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.3 D125 - Automotive Shop 2600 72 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 4.176 10857.6 1606.925 72 0 None 58 4.18 0% 10857.6 $1,606.92 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 D125 - Automotive Shop Locker 2600 4 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.232 603.2 89.2736 4 0 None 58 0.23 0% 603.2 $89.27 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.2 D121 - Electric Shop 2600 60 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Parabolic Lens58 3.48 9048 1339.104 60 0 None 58 3.48 0% 9048 $1,339.10 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.2 2600 16 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

104 1.664 4326.4 640.3072 16 0 None 104 1.66 0% 4326.4 $640.31 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

247.2 2600 3 42x2, 4 Lamp, 17w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

60 0.18 468 69.264 3 0 None 60 0.18 0% 468 $69.26 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

770 Gym 3000 44 1 400w MH LoBay, Prismatic Lens 465 20.46 61380 9084.24 44 4 None 465 20.46 0% 61380 $9,084.24 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.2 3600 12 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.696 2505.6 370.8288 12 2Daylight Sensor

(Sensorswitch PP-20 & CM-PC or equal)

58 0.56 20% 2004.48 $296.66 $280.00 $560.00 0.14 501.12 $74.17 7.55

601 8760 1 2 (2) 7w CFL Exit Sign 16 0.016 140.16 20.74368 1 0 None 16 0.02 0% 140.16 $20.74 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 E102 - Women's Restroom 2600 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.174 452.4 66.9552 3 0 None 58 0.17 0% 452.4 $66.96 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 E103 - Custodial Closet 800 1 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.058 46.4 6.8672 1 0 None 58 0.06 0% 46.4 $6.87 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 E104 - Men's Restroom 2600 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.174 452.4 66.9552 3 0 None 58 0.17 0% 452.4 $66.96 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

D117 - Art

Gym Lobby

Page 90: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix EPage 15 of 19

232.2 E113 - Weight Room 2600 12 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens86 1.032 2683.2 397.1136 12 2 Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor 86 0.83 20% 2146.56 $317.69 $160.00 $320.00 0.21 536.64 $79.42 4.03

221.1 D100 - Corridor 3600 8 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.464 1670.4 247.2192 8 0 None 58 0.46 0% 1670.4 $247.22 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 C110 Electrical Equipment 800 2 1 4' Channel, 32w T8,

Surface Mnt., No Lens 28 0.056 44.8 6.6304 2 0 None 28 0.06 0% 44.8 $6.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 C109 Supply Closet 800 2 1 4' Channel, 32w T8,

Surface Mnt., No Lens 28 0.056 44.8 6.6304 2 0 None 28 0.06 0% 44.8 $6.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.2C111 -

Office/Conference Room

2600 7 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.602 1565.2 231.6496 7 0 None 86 0.60 0% 1565.2 $231.65 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.2 C106 - Facility Dining 2600 21 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens104 2.184 5678.4 840.4032 21 0 None 104 2.18 0% 5678.4 $840.40 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.2 2600 2 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

104 0.208 540.8 80.0384 2 0 None 104 0.21 0% 540.8 $80.04 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

247.2 2600 1 42x2, 4 Lamp, 17w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

60 0.06 156 23.088 1 0 None 60 0.06 0% 156 $23.09 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.2 2600 0 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

104 0 0 0 0 0 None 104 0.00 0% 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

247.2 2600 0 42x2, 4 Lamp, 17w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

60 0 0 0 0 0 None 60 0.00 0% 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.2 2600 24 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

104 2.496 6489.6 960.4608 24 0 None 104 2.50 0% 6489.6 $960.46 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.2 2600 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface

Mnt., Acrylic Lens58 0.232 603.2 89.2736 4 0 None 58 0.23 0% 603.2 $89.27 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

617 Kitchen Hood 2600 10 1 Hood Light w/Globe & Cage, 100w A19 Lamp 100 1 2600 384.8 10 0 None 100 1.00 0% 2600 $384.80 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.2 C116 - Kitchen Office 2600 2 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens104 0.208 540.8 80.0384 2 0 None 104 0.21 0% 540.8 $80.04 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.2 C120 - Restroom 800 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface

Mnt., Acrylic Lens58 0.058 46.4 6.8672 1 0 None 58 0.06 0% 46.4 $6.87 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 C105 Custodial Closet 800 2 1 4' Channel, 32w T8,

Surface Mnt., No Lens 28 0.056 44.8 6.6304 2 0 None 28 0.06 0% 44.8 $6.63 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.2 E123 - Office 2600 8 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface

Mnt., Acrylic Lens58 0.464 1206.4 178.5472 8 0 None 58 0.46 0% 1206.4 $178.55 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 E122 - Girl's Restroom 2600 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.174 452.4 66.9552 3 0 None 58 0.17 0% 452.4 $66.96 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

C113 - Men's Restroom

C112 - Women's Restroom

C108 - Kitchen

Page 91: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix EPage 16 of 19

803 E121 Custodial Closet 800 1 1 4' Channel, 32w T8,

Surface Mnt., No Lens 28 0.028 22.4 3.3152 1 0 None 28 0.03 0% 22.4 $3.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 E120 - Boy's Restroom 2600 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.174 452.4 66.9552 3 0 None 58 0.17 0% 452.4 $66.96 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 Corridor "E" 3600 68 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 3.944 14198.4 2101.363 68 0 None 58 3.94 0% 14198.4 $2,101.36 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 Corridor "E 106" 3600 18 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 1.044 3758.4 556.2432 18 0 None 58 1.04 0% 3758.4 $556.24 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 E119 - Office 2600 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.232 603.2 89.2736 4 0 None 58 0.23 0% 603.2 $89.27 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.3 E117 - Choral Room 2600 23 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 1.334 3468.4 513.3232 23 0 None 58 1.33 0% 3468.4 $513.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 F115 - Storage 800 2 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.116 92.8 13.7344 2 0 None 58 0.12 0% 92.8 $13.73 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.2 E114 - Classroom 2600 10 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.58 1508 223.184 10 0 None 58 0.58 0% 1508 $223.18 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 E108 - Band Storage 800 2 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.116 92.8 13.7344 2 0 None 58 0.12 0% 92.8 $13.73 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.3 E107 - Band Room 2600 33 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 1.914 4976.4 736.5072 33 0 None 58 1.91 0% 4976.4 $736.51 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

241.1 E112 - Band Offices 2600 3 4

1x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

104 0.312 811.2 120.0576 3 0 None 104 0.31 0% 811.2 $120.06 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 E105 - Storage 800 4 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.232 185.6 27.4688 4 0 None 58 0.23 0% 185.6 $27.47 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.2 E129 - Auditorium 2600 43 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

104 4.472 11627.2 1720.826 43 0 None 104 4.47 0% 11627.2 $1,720.83 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

800 Auditorium Side Entrance 2600 6 1

1x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal

Lens, 100w A19 Lamp100 0.6 1560 230.88 6 0 None 100 0.60 0% 1560 $230.88 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 Stage 2600 21 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 1.218 3166.8 468.6864 21 0 None 58 1.22 0% 3166.8 $468.69 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

128.1 Maintenance Garage 4200 8 2

8' Channel, 2 Lamp, 75w T12, Mag. Ballast, Surface Mnt., No Lens

142 1.136 4771.2 706.1376 8 1

Occupancy and Daylight Sensor (Sensorswitch PP-

20, CM-PC & CM-PDT or equal)

142 0.91 20% 3816.96 $564.91 $280.00 $280.00 0.23 954.24 $141.23 1.98

221.4 E125 - Men's Dressing Room 800 4 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant

Mnt., Clear Acrylic Lens

58 0.232 185.6 27.4688 4 0 None 58 0.23 0% 185.6 $27.47 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

801 E125 - Men's Dressing Restroom 800 1 2 Wall Mnt. Vanity Light,

(2) 60w A19 Lamps 120 0.12 96 14.208 1 0 None 120 0.12 0% 96 $14.21 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.4 E128 - Women Dressing Room 800 4 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant

Mnt., Clear Acrylic Lens

58 0.232 185.6 27.4688 4 0 None 58 0.23 0% 185.6 $27.47 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Page 92: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix EPage 17 of 19

801 E128 - Women Dressing Restroom 800 1 2 Wall Mnt. Vanity Light,

(2) 60w A19 Lamps 120 0.12 96 14.208 1 0 None 120 0.12 0% 96 $14.21 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 E130 - Electrical Room 800 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.174 139.2 20.6016 3 0 None 58 0.17 0% 139.2 $20.60 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

802 Corridor "A102" 3600 11 16"x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface

Mnt., Prismatic Diffuser28 0.308 1108.8 164.1024 11 0 None 28 0.31 0% 1108.8 $164.10 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 A106 - Office 2600 6 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.348 904.8 133.9104 6 0 None 58 0.35 0% 904.8 $133.91 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.2 2600 30 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 2.58 6708 992.784 30 0 None 86 2.58 0% 6708 $992.78 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

802 2600 32 16"x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface

Mnt., Prismatic Diffuser28 0.896 2329.6 344.7808 32 0 None 28 0.90 0% 2329.6 $344.78 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.2 Library Office 2600 6 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface

Mnt., Acrylic Lens58 0.348 904.8 133.9104 6 0 None 58 0.35 0% 904.8 $133.91 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.2 A110 - Book Storage 2600 10 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface

Mnt., Acrylic Lens58 0.58 1508 223.184 10 1 Dual Technology

Occupancy Sensor 58 0.46 20% 1206.4 $178.55 $160.00 $160.00 0.12 301.6 $44.64 3.58

242.2 A100 - Entrance 3600 9 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

104 0.936 3369.6 498.7008 9 1Daylight Sensor

(Sensorswitch PP-20 & CM-PC or equal)

104 0.75 20% 2695.68 $398.96 $280.00 $280.00 0.19 673.92 $99.74 2.81

221.2 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface

Mnt., Acrylic Lens58 0.696 1809.6 267.8208 12 0 None 58 0.70 0% 1809.6 $267.82 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

802 2600 16 16"x4, 1 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface

Mnt., Prismatic Diffuser28 0.448 1164.8 172.3904 16 0 None 28 0.45 0% 1164.8 $172.39 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

801 Women's Restroom 800 1 2 Wall Mnt. Vanity Light, (2) 60w A19 Lamps 120 0.12 96 14.208 1 0 None 120 0.12 0% 96 $14.21 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

801 Men's Restroom 800 1 2 Wall Mnt. Vanity Light, (2) 60w A19 Lamps 120 0.12 96 14.208 1 0 None 120 0.12 0% 96 $14.21 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

613 A132 Custodial Closet 800 0 1 "Keyless" Socket, 100w

A19 Lamp 100 0 0 0 0 0 None 100 0.00 0% 0 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

801 800 1 2 Wall Mnt. Vanity Light, (2) 60w A19 Lamps 120 0.12 96 14.208 1 0 None 120 0.12 0% 96 $14.21 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

800 800 1 11x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal

Lens, 100w A19 Lamp100 0.1 80 11.84 1 0 None 100 0.10 0% 80 $11.84 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.2 A148 - Assistant Principal Office 2600 3 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens104 0.312 811.2 120.0576 3 0 None 104 0.31 0% 811.2 $120.06 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

801 800 1 2 Wall Mnt. Vanity Light, (2) 60w A19 Lamps 120 0.12 96 14.208 1 0 None 120 0.12 0% 96 $14.21 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

800 800 1 11x1 Recessed Down Light, Dropped Opal

Lens, 100w A19 Lamp100 0.1 80 11.84 1 0 None 100 0.10 0% 80 $11.84 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

A1041 - Library

Main Office

A133 - Women's Restroom

A134 - Men's Restroom

Page 93: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix EPage 18 of 19

242.2 A144 - Conference Room 2600 2 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens104 0.208 540.8 80.0384 2 0 None 104 0.21 0% 540.8 $80.04 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.2 A143 - Office 2600 2 42x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

104 0.208 540.8 80.0384 2 0 None 104 0.21 0% 540.8 $80.04 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.2 A140 - Principal Office 2600 3 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens104 0.312 811.2 120.0576 3 0 None 104 0.31 0% 811.2 $120.06 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.2 B102 - Classroom 2600 9 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.774 2012.4 297.8352 9 0 None 86 0.77 0% 2012.4 $297.84 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.2 B101 - Classroom 2600 9 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 0.774 2012.4 297.8352 9 0 None 86 0.77 0% 2012.4 $297.84 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.2 B100 - Special Services 2600 18 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens58 1.044 2714.4 401.7312 18 0 None 58 1.04 0% 2714.4 $401.73 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

222.3 B105 - Computer Lab 2600 15 2

2x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Pendant Mnt., Parabolic Lens

58 0.87 2262 334.776 15 0 None 58 0.87 0% 2262 $334.78 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.2 B104 - Computer Lab 2600 12 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Parabolic Lens104 1.248 3244.8 480.2304 12 0 None 104 1.25 0% 3244.8 $480.23 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.2 B103 - Computer Lab 2600 15 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Parabolic Lens104 1.56 4056 600.288 15 0 None 104 1.56 0% 4056 $600.29 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 Corridor "A" 3600 44 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 2.552 9187.2 1359.706 44 0 None 58 2.55 0% 9187.2 $1,359.71 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 B107 - Custodial Closet 800 1 1 4' Channel, 32w T8,

Surface Mnt., No Lens 28 0.028 22.4 3.3152 1 0 None 28 0.03 0% 22.4 $3.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

803 B108 - Custodial Closet 800 1 1 4' Channel, 32w T8,

Surface Mnt., No Lens 28 0.028 22.4 3.3152 1 0 None 28 0.03 0% 22.4 $3.32 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

242.2 B109 - Child Study Team 2600 14 4

2x4, 4 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Prismatic Lens104 1.456 3785.6 560.2688 14 0 None 104 1.46 0% 3785.6 $560.27 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.2 B110 - Classroom 2600 22 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

86 1.892 4919.2 728.0416 22 0 None 86 1.89 0% 4919.2 $728.04 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.2 B113 - Computer Lab 2600 9 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Parabolic Lens86 0.774 2012.4 297.8352 9 0 None 86 0.77 0% 2012.4 $297.84 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.2 B112 - Computer Lab 2600 9 3

2x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Recessed

Mnt., Parabolic Lens86 0.774 2012.4 297.8352 9 0 None 86 0.77 0% 2012.4 $297.84 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

232.2 B111 - Classroom 2600 9 32x4, 3 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Parabolic Lens

86 0.774 2012.4 297.8352 9 0 None 86 0.77 0% 2012.4 $297.84 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

Page 94: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix EPage 19 of 19

221.2 B115 - Girl's Restroom 2600 13 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface

Mnt., Acrylic Lens58 0.754 1960.4 290.1392 13 0 None 58 0.75 0% 1960.4 $290.14 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 Electrical Closet 800 1 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.058 46.4 6.8672 1 0 None 58 0.06 0% 46.4 $6.87 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 B106A - Elevator Control 800 3 2

1x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.174 139.2 20.6016 3 0 None 58 0.17 0% 139.2 $20.60 $0.00 $0.00 0.00 0 $0.00 0.00

221.1 B139 - Classroom 2600 12 21x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8, Elect. Ballast, Surface Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.696 1809.6 267.8208 12 12 Pole Power Pack w/Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor (Sensorswitch or equal)

58 0.56 20% 1447.68 $214.26 $225.00 $225.00 0.14 361.92 $53.56 4.20

222.2 B138 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.522 1357.2 200.8656 9 12 Pole Power Pack w/Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor (Sensorswitch or equal)

58 0.42 20% 1085.76 $160.69 $225.00 $225.00 0.10 271.44 $40.17 5.60

222.2 B137 - Classroom 2600 9 22x4, 2 Lamp, 32w T8,

Elect. Ballast, Recessed Mnt., Prismatic Lens

58 0.522 1357.2 200.8656 9 12 Pole Power Pack w/Dual Tech. Occupancy Sensor (Sensorswitch or equal)

58 0.42 20% 1085.76 $160.69 $225.00 $225.00 0.10 271.44 $40.17 5.60

Page 95: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix FPage 1 of 2

Project Name: LGEA Solar PV Project - Overbrook Senior High SchoolLocation: Pine Hill, NJ

Description: Photovoltaic System - Direct Purchase

Simple Payback AnalysisPhotovoltaic System - Direct Purchase

Total Construction Cost $1,690,960Annual kWh Production 258,221

Annual Energy Cost Reduction $38,217Annual SREC Revenue $90,377

First Cost Premium

Simple Payback: Years

Life Cycle Cost AnalysisAnalysis Period (years): 25 Financing %: 0%Financing Term (mths): 0 Maintenance Escalation Rate: 3.0%

Average Energy Cost ($/kWh) $0.148 Energy Cost Escalation Rate: 3.0%Financing Rate: 0.00% SREC Value ($/kWh) $0.350

Period Additional Energy kWh Energy Cost Additional SREC Net Cash CumulativeCash Outlay Production Savings Maint Costs Revenue Flow Cash Flow

0 $1,690,960 0 0 0 $0 (1,690,960) 01 $0 258,221 $38,217 $0 $90,377 $128,594 ($1,562,366)2 $0 256,930 $39,363 $0 $89,925 $129,289 ($1,433,077)3 $0 255,645 $40,544 $0 $89,476 $130,020 ($1,303,057)4 $0 254,367 $41,760 $0 $89,028 $130,789 ($1,172,268)5 $0 253,095 $43,013 $2,607 $88,583 $128,990 ($1,043,279)6 $0 251,830 $44,304 $2,594 $88,140 $129,850 ($913,429)7 $0 250,571 $45,633 $2,581 $87,700 $130,752 ($782,677)8 $0 249,318 $47,002 $2,568 $87,261 $131,695 ($650,982)9 $0 248,071 $48,412 $2,555 $86,825 $132,682 ($518,301)10 $0 246,831 $49,864 $2,542 $86,391 $133,713 ($384,588)11 $0 245,597 $51,360 $2,530 $85,959 $134,789 ($249,799)12 $0 244,369 $52,901 $2,517 $85,529 $135,913 ($113,886)13 $0 243,147 $54,488 $2,504 $85,101 $137,085 $23,19914 $0 241,931 $56,123 $2,492 $84,676 $138,307 $161,50515 $0 240,721 $57,806 $2,479 $84,252 $139,579 $301,08516 $0 239,518 $59,540 $2,467 $83,831 $140,905 $441,98917 $0 238,320 $61,327 $2,455 $83,412 $142,284 $584,27318 $0 237,129 $63,166 $2,442 $82,995 $143,719 $727,99219 $0 235,943 $65,061 $2,430 $82,580 $145,211 $873,20320 $0 234,763 $67,013 $2,418 $82,167 $146,762 $1,019,96621 $1 233,589 $69,024 $2,406 $81,756 $148,374 $1,168,34022 $2 232,421 $71,094 $2,394 $81,348 $150,048 $1,318,38823 $3 231,259 $73,227 $2,382 $80,941 $151,786 $1,470,17424 $4 230,103 $75,424 $2,370 $80,536 $153,590 $1,623,76425 $5 228,953 $77,687 $2,358 $80,133 $155,462 $1,779,225

Totals: 6,082,641 $1,393,353 $52,092 $2,128,924 $3,470,185 $1,365,395Net Present Value (NPV)

Internal Rate of Return (IRR)

13.15

$1,690,960

$1,779,2506.3%

Page 96: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix FPage 2 of 2

Building Roof Area (sq ft) Panel Qty Panel Sq

Ft

Panel Total Sq

Ft

Total KWDC

Total Annual

kWh

Panel Weight (33

lbs)W/SQFT

Overbrook Senior High School 15000 Sunpower

SPR230 919 14.7 13,513 211.37 258,221 30,327 15.64

.= Proposed PV LayoutNotes:1. Estimated kWH based on the National Renewable Energy Laboratory PVWatts Version 1 Calculator Program.

Page 97: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix G Page 1 of 1

Concord Engineering Group, Inc. 520 BURNT MILL ROAD VOORHEES, NEW JERSEY 08043 PHONE: (856) 427-0200 FAX: (856) 427-6508

Energy Conservation Measure Calculation Values

FUEL HEAT VALUES

DESCRIPTION VALUE UNITS

Electric Heat Value 3413 Btu/kWh

Nat Gas Heat Value 100,000 Btu/Therm

#2 Oil Heat Value 140,000 Btu/Gallon

Propane Heat Value 91,600 Btu/Gallon

CONVERSION FACTORS

DESCRIPTION VALUE EQUIVALENT VALUE

British Thermal Unit 1 Btu (Lb-°F) Heat to raise 1 lb water 1°F (liquid)

Water Conversion 1 gallon water 8.33 lbs water

Cooling Capacity 1 Ton 12,000 Btu/Hr.

Heating Capacity 1 MBH 1000 Btu/Hr

Horse Power 1 HP 0.746 kWh

EFFICIENCY / ENERGY DEFINITIONS

DESCRIPTION VALUE DEFINITION Full Load Cooling

Efficiency EER Btu/Wh or kBtu/kWh (output Btus per input Watt-Hr)

Seasonal Cooling Efficiency SEER Btu/Wh or kBtu/kWh (output Btus per input Watt-Hr)

Cooling Efficiency KW/Ton Input kilo-Watt per output Tons

Heating Efficiency % Ratio Output to Input Energy

Heating Efficiency (Heat Pumps) HSPF Btu/Wh or kBtu/kWh (output Btus per input Watt-Hr)

Heating / Cooling Efficiency COP Ratio Output to Input Energy

Heating Degree Days HDD ∑ (degrees below room set point X heating days)

Full Load Cooling Hrs Hrs/Yr Estimated equivalent total hours for cooling system operating at full load

Page 98: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix HPage 1 of 5

INTELLI-HOOD VARIABLE EXHAUST CONTROLLER

COMPANY: Pine Hill - Overbrook High SchoolRETROFIT

ADDRESS: 1200 Turnerville Rd

Pine Hill NJ, 08021 May-24-09

ENERGY SAVINGS REPORT

Pine Hill NJ, 08021 May-24-09

APPLICATION: Main Kitchen

- MOTOR OPERATING SAVINGS: $627 /YEAR

HEATING SAVINGS: $3 920 /YEAR- HEATING SAVINGS: $3,920 /YEAR

- COOLING SAVINGS: $0 /YEAR

- TOTAL SAVINGS: $4,547 /YEAR

- INSTALLED COST: $32,237

- PAYBACK PERIOD: 7.1 YEARS

- RATE OF RETURN - 5 YEARS: -8.8 %

10 YEARS: 9.4 %10 YEARS: 9.4 %

The projected savings shown above are based on the above store's

operating hours, HVAC system, cooking load, and geographic location.

Page 99: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix HPage 2 of 5

I. MOTOR OPERATING SAVINGS

INPUT DATA:

A Operating Hours Per Day 9 HRS/DAY

B Operating Days Per Week 5 DAYS/WK

C Operating Weeks Per Year 42 WKS/YR

D Horsepower of Fan Motor(s) 5 HP

E Load Factor of Fan Motor(s) 0.75

F Cost Per Kilowatt Hour 0.148 $/KWHR

CONSTANT EXHAUST VOLUME ANALYSIS:

G Total Time (A x B x C) 1890 HRS/YR

H Total KWHR/HP/YR (0.746/0.9 x G) 1566.6 KWHR/HP/YR

VARIABLE EXHAUST VOLUME ANALYSIS:

% Rated % Run Time Output System Input KWHR/RPM Time HRS/YR KW/HP Effic. KW/HP HP/YR

H I J=FxI K L M=K/L N=JxM

100 14.2857143 270 0.746 0.9 0.829 223.8

90 7.14285714 135 0.544 0.9 0.604 81.6

80 7.14285714 135 0.382 0.9 0.424 57.3

70 3.57142857 67.5 0.256 0.9 0.284 19.2

60 3.57142857 67.5 0.161 0.9 0.179 12.1

50 3.57142857 67.5 0.093 0.9 0.103 7.0

40 17.8571429 337.5 0.048 0.9 0.053 18.0

30 42.8571429 810 0.020 0.9 0.022 18.0

20 0 0 0.015 0.9 0.017 0.0

10 0 0 0.010 0.90 0.011 0.0 _________

O Total KWH/HP/YR (Total of Column N) 437.0

CALCULATION:

SAVINGS = (H - O) x D x E x F = $627 /YEAR ============

Page 100: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix HPage 3 of 5

II. CONDITIONED MAKE-UP AIR - HEATING

INPUT DATA:

A Previous Net Exhaust Volume 16000 CFM

B New Net Exhaust Volume (1) 8457 CFM

C Winter Building Temperature 65 F

D Previous Net Heat Load (2) 650756 kBTU

E New Net Heat Load (2) 343971 kBTU

F Operating Hours Per Day 9 HRS/DAY

G Operating Days Per Week 5 DAYS/WK

- Heating Fuel Type Nat Gas

H Cost Per Fuel Unit (3) 1.64 $/UNIT

J BTU Per Fuel Unit (4) 100 kBTU/UNIT

K System Efficiency (4) 0.77

CALCULATION:

SAVINGS = (D - E) x 0.6 x H / (J x K)

= $3,920 /YEAR ==========

NOTES:TABLE 1

(1) Determine the New ExhaustVolume by completing TABLE 1. % Rated % RunThe New Exhaust Volume equals RPM (F) Time (I) F x Ithe AVG % RPM x the PreviousExhaust Volume. 100 14 14

90 7 6(2) Using design weather data 80 7 6via the Outdoor Airload Calculator 70 4 3and multiplied by days/year ratio. 60 4 2

50 4 2(3) Using local energy costs. 40 18 7

30 43 13(4) Using typical system 20 0 0efficiency. 10 0 0

AVG % RPM = 53%

Page 101: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix HPage 4 of 5

III. CONDITIONED MAKE-UP AIR SAVINGS - COOLING

INPUT DATA:

A Previous Net Exhaust Volume 16000 CFM

B New Net Exhaust Volume (1) 8457 CFM

C Previous Net Cooling Load (2) 0 kBTU

D New Net Cooling Load (2) 0 kBTU

E AC Correction Factor (3) 1

F Cost Per Fuel Unit (5) 0.148 $/kWH

G COP (6) 3

CALCULATION:

SAVINGS = (C - D) x 0.6 x E x F / (3.413 x G)

= $0 /YEAR ============

NOTES:

(1) Using New Exhaust Volume from CONDITIONED MAKE-UP AIRSAVINGS - HEATING on page 2. See Note 1.

(2) Obtained from Outdoor Airload Calculator

(3) Using design weather data.

(4) The multiplier corrects for actual % outside air.

(5) Using local energy costs.

(6) Using typical system efficiency.

Page 102: LOCAL GOVERNMENT ENERGY AUDIT PROGRAM ENERGY … · 7/15/2010  · ECM #7 Melink Kitchen Exhaust $32,237 $4,547 7.1 111.6% REM #1 211.37 KW PV System $1,690,960 $128,594 13.1 90.1%

Appendix HPage 5 of 5

AFTER-TAX CASH FLOW ANALYSIS

INPUT DATA:

FIRST YEAR SAVINGS $4,547 /YEAR

INITIAL COST PLUS INSTALLATION $32,237

MARGINAL TAX RATE 0%

ESTIMATED ANNUAL INCREASE IN ENERGY COSTS 3%

NETDEPREC. DEPREC. AFTER-TAX

YEAR SAVINGS COST % $ CASH FLOW

0 -32,237 -32,2371 4547 - 29 9349 45472 4684 - 20 6447 46843 4824 - 13 4191 48244 4969 - 10 3224 49695 5118 - 9 2901 51186 5272 - 9 2901 52727 5430 - 9 2901 54308 5593 - 55939 5761 - 5761

10 5933 - 5933

CALCULATIONS:

NET PRESENT VALUE = -$14,072 ; INTERNAL RATE 5 YEARS @ 15% OF RETURN (IRR) = -8.8 %

NET PRESENT VALUE = -$6,026 ; INTERNAL RATE 10 YEARS @ 15% OF RETURN (IRR) = 9.4 %

NOTE:

Net After-tax Cash Flow is calculated as follows: NATCF = SAVINGS - COSTS - TAX RATE(SAVINGS - COSTS - DEPRECIATION)

Net Present Value is calculated as follows: NPV = C(0) + C(1)/(1 + r) + C(2)/(1 + r)^2 + ... + C(n)/(1 + r)^n (where C(n) is the net cash flow for the nth year and r is the opportunity cost of capital)

IRR is calculated by trial and error using the formula: NPV = C(0) + C(1)/(1 + IRR) + C(2)/(1 + IRR)^2 + ... + C(n)/(1 + IRR)^n