local action plan through a cooperative, non-adversarial, constructive engagement process
TRANSCRIPT
Setting up a local environmental health action plan (LEHAP) Setting up a local environmental health action plan (LEHAP) around an industrial site in Beerse (Belgium - Flanders) around an industrial site in Beerse (Belgium - Flanders)
through a cooperative, non-adversarial, constructive through a cooperative, non-adversarial, constructive engagement processengagement process
K. Wynants, J. Van DammeK. Wynants, J. Van Damme
(MOPAN)(MOPAN)
2
Content
1. Short history of industrial site Beerse
2. Social context
3. Why a multiparty partnership?
4. The start of the partnership
5. Intensifying the partnership
6. Results
7. Legitimize the partnership
8. Lessons learned
ContentContent
3
Industrial site ‘kanaalzone WestHistoryHistory
• +/- 1900: Kempen area was poor, sparsely populated, with +/- 1900: Kempen area was poor, sparsely populated, with little agricultural activity: ideal for polluting activities little agricultural activity: ideal for polluting activities
• 3 3 companies settled around the canal in Beersecompanies settled around the canal in Beerse• Two produced heavy metals (copper, lead, antimony, …)Two produced heavy metals (copper, lead, antimony, …)• One production site of bricks/ clay mining activitiesOne production site of bricks/ clay mining activities
Heavy pressure on the surrounding environmentHeavy pressure on the surrounding environment
4
Industrial site ‘kanaalzone WestHistoryHistory
5
Social contextSocial context
• Growing urbanization around the canal: conflicting interests Growing urbanization around the canal: conflicting interests starting to appearstarting to appear
• 70’s, 80’s, 90’s: ‘social outbreaks’ 70’s, 80’s, 90’s: ‘social outbreaks’ several ad hoc initiatives: several ad hoc initiatives: Soil investigationsSoil investigations Vegetable investigationsVegetable investigations Information on the environmental health risks of heavy Information on the environmental health risks of heavy
metals and precautionary measurements: social metals and precautionary measurements: social resistanceresistance
Perceived as an easy solution for the Perceived as an easy solution for the government/companiesgovernment/companies
Residents felt not responsable, had no kind of influence Residents felt not responsable, had no kind of influence in the decision making process: ‘victims’in the decision making process: ‘victims’
• A general atmosphere of indifference, A general atmosphere of indifference, dissatisfaction, dissatisfaction, frustration, distrustfrustration, distrust
6
Social context (’05)Social context (’05)
• No collaboration, no cohesionNo collaboration, no cohesion• No No satisfying, satisfying, sustainable, effective sustainable, effective approachapproach• A great need to bring all parties together:A great need to bring all parties together:
• How?How?• Who?Who?• When?When?
• No experience nor expertise with facilitating interactive No experience nor expertise with facilitating interactive processes, group dynamics, …processes, group dynamics, …
• Change of role of local environmental health worker: from Change of role of local environmental health worker: from ‘environmental health expert’ to a ‘process facilitator’‘environmental health expert’ to a ‘process facilitator’
7
• Local environmental health hot spots are complexLocal environmental health hot spots are complex• Different levels of actions, different parties need to act and Different levels of actions, different parties need to act and
collaboratecollaborate
Why a multiparty partnership?Why a multiparty partnership?
cadmium inbinnenlucht
Cadmium inbloed, urine
Omwonenden
Cadmium inbodemstof
Cadmium inde buitenlucht
Cadmium in delongen
Omwonenden
Cadmium in deondergrond
cadmium in etenOmwonenden
Cadmium ingrondwater
Cadmium inoppervlaktewater
Cadmium instof binnenhuis
Cadmiumzinkassen
Cadmiumstof inde mond
Omwonenden
Fysieke incl.neurotoxische
gezondheidstoestandm.b.t. cadmiumOmwonenden
Kenniscadmium en de
gevolgenKennis vancadmium
Omwonenden
LozingCadmiumBedrijf
Perceptie risicoOmwonenden
Productie zink,cadmium, ...Bedrijf
psychischegezondheidstoestandOmwonenden
Roken binnenOmwonenden
Saneringgrondwater
Omwonenden
Sociaalklimaat
Sociaal welzijnin relatie totcadmium
uitstoot cadmiumbinnenbronnenOmwonenden
UitstootcadmiumBedrijf
8
• 2006: a biomonitoring campaign to collect more detailed data 2006: a biomonitoring campaign to collect more detailed data aabout the human exposure to toxic metals (cadmium, lead) in bout the human exposure to toxic metals (cadmium, lead) in
the neighboorhoodthe neighboorhood About About the perception of the environmental health risksthe perception of the environmental health risks About the needs in the neighborhood concerning About the needs in the neighborhood concerning
participation in a future decision making processparticipation in a future decision making process
= A concrete project that provided an opportunity to start the = A concrete project that provided an opportunity to start the collaborationcollaboration
Start of the partnershipStart of the partnership
9
• A three level collaboration:A three level collaboration:
1.1. Project team: Flemish health administration, local Project team: Flemish health administration, local environmental health workerenvironmental health worker
2.2. Steering group: + school, local government, local health Steering group: + school, local government, local health advisory, GP’sadvisory, GP’s
3.3. Consultation group: + residents, other administrations, Consultation group: + residents, other administrations, factories, …factories, …
• A split of roles:A split of roles: Flemish health administration = ‘experts’Flemish health administration = ‘experts’ local environmental health worker = ‘facilitator of the local environmental health worker = ‘facilitator of the
process’process’ InformationInformation Consultation: rather simple interactive working methods Consultation: rather simple interactive working methods
Start of the partnershipStart of the partnership
10
• 2007: biomonitoring campaign finished2007: biomonitoring campaign finished Results were not extremely worrying: no crisis situationResults were not extremely worrying: no crisis situation Growing mutual trust and appreciationGrowing mutual trust and appreciation
Together with all parties: decision to intensify ‘the partnership’:Together with all parties: decision to intensify ‘the partnership’: tto translate the results of the biomonitoring campaign into o translate the results of the biomonitoring campaign into
concrete policy measurements: One common local concrete policy measurements: One common local environmental health action planenvironmental health action plan
One large One large steering group instead of a ‘consulting group’: steering group instead of a ‘consulting group’: coproduction instead of consultationcoproduction instead of consultation
Robust plan for interactive processRobust plan for interactive process
Intensifying the partnershipIntensifying the partnership
11
Voorjaar 2007: scharniermoment Beerse
Process designProcess design
12
13
• Local environmental health action plan (2007-2012) Local environmental health action plan (2007-2012) Divers (other focusses)Divers (other focusses) CheapCheap ‘‘consensus’consensus’ Distribution of tasks and accountabilityDistribution of tasks and accountability Increased engagementIncreased engagement ……
• Mutual respect, understanding, trust, satisfaction…Mutual respect, understanding, trust, satisfaction…
ResultsResults
14
ResultsResults
15
Resultaten (inhoudelijk/procesmatig) LegitimizeLegitimize the partnership the partnership
• No legal basis, no procedures: legitimacy?No legal basis, no procedures: legitimacy?• Solutions:Solutions:
1.1. Compete in Awards:Compete in Awards:• Wyeth health&environment Award 2007Wyeth health&environment Award 2007• European public sector Awards 2007 (diploma)European public sector Awards 2007 (diploma)• Belgian Energy & environment Award 2008 (nomination)Belgian Energy & environment Award 2008 (nomination)
2.2. Academic interest in the process - Scientific researchAcademic interest in the process - Scientific research3.3. DDeclaration of eclaration of Engagement Engagement
• List of the major List of the major agreementsagreements• Signed by all the partiesSigned by all the parties• ‘‘Gentlemen’s agreement’Gentlemen’s agreement’• Explicit mutual appreciationExplicit mutual appreciation
16
Resultaten (inhoudelijk/procesmatig) Lessons learnedLessons learned• Mutual trust is key, building trust takes timeMutual trust is key, building trust takes time• ContinuousContinuous input of impulses needed to keep everybody going input of impulses needed to keep everybody going
On site visitsOn site visits Application of interactive working methods (brainstorming, Application of interactive working methods (brainstorming,
metaplan, priorities grid, …)metaplan, priorities grid, …) Different hosts for every meetingDifferent hosts for every meeting Informal drinksInformal drinks ……
• Monitoring of expectations: on individual as on group levelMonitoring of expectations: on individual as on group level Anticipate evolutions, coaching, ‘shepherd’Anticipate evolutions, coaching, ‘shepherd’
• Facilitator:Facilitator: Explicit about your role, neutralExplicit about your role, neutral A great will to bring all parties closer together , accepted by all A great will to bring all parties closer together , accepted by all
partiesparties• Process design:Process design:
As simple as possible: transparent, As simple as possible: transparent, accessibleaccessible Roles/impact are more clearRoles/impact are more clear Less chewingLess chewing
17
Resultaten (inhoudelijk/procesmatig) Lessons learnedLessons learned
• Consensus: Not necessary Takes too much time Creative ideas get lost
• Labour/time intensive: For both participants as facilitators Participation fatigue: sometimes too intense Repeatable in other hotspots?
Better preliminary division/analysis of the subject/policy space is desirable
• Limited interest/engagement from policy makers Delay Unclear legitimacy More freedom, space and time to experiment/learn
• Policy makers do not share common values and sometimes ignore agreements
18
Resultaten (inhoudelijk/procesmatig) AanbevelingenAanbevelingen
• Tijdsintensief: kwestie van keuzes, waarden• Positie/context Vlaamse ambtenaar
• extreem moeilijk, zeker in lokale context• OVAM: strikt wettelijke/juridische
• Eigenschappen overheidsactoren• Doorzettingsvermogen, wil om te slagen• Durven experimenteren, ondernemen• Ingesteldheid: empathie, respect• Bewust van verschillende perspectieven, belangen• Durven controle loslaten; controle en vertrouwen in/via het
proces: gedeelde verantwoordelijkheid• Iedereen af en toe eens laten scoren, zeker politiek• Participatie = samenleving, overheid ‘verversen’, vernieuwen
• Niet enkel interne oefening• Interne organisatiecultuur wel heel belangrijk
• Ambtelijk niveau kan wel degelijk verschil maken• Beerse: unieke samenwerking tussen bovenlokaal en lokaal
19
Koen WynantsKoen Wynants
Antwerpen aan't woord(A) Gasstraat 12, 2060 Antwerpen
(T) 0473/865503(M) [email protected]
(W) www.antwerpenaantwoord.be, www.facebook.com/Antwerpenaantwoord, @
Aaantwoord