lm town hall comments faq3.4.14[1]
TRANSCRIPT
Questions and Comment Cards
Town Hall Meeting at La Mirada HS
March 4, 2014
1. How does the LCFF impact SSC? The School Site Council (SSC) at each school will still be
involved in the development of the new plan that uses the new funding LCCF –Local Control Funding Formula to support programs for the students and staff and parents of the school. New regulations will be coming from the CA Department of Education soon.
2. Why is the District focusing on all 8 priorities when they could choose less to focus on? It seems the effectiveness will be seriously diffused by this approach. The 8 state priorities are required to be addressed in each LCAP plan because they are the basic legal (Ed Code), educational, and economic guidelines provided by the State. It is part of the template that was approved on January 16 along with other emergency regulations. IT IS a three-‐year plan that can allow for a focus each year, if the process determines that after input from stakeholders.
3. Will La Mirada schools be funded at the same levels as the Norwalk schools? The equitable distribution of funds in order to create parity among programs will be emphasized in the development of the plan.
4. What is being done to help students who don’t fall under “basic” or “Special Ed,” etc.? Those that can fall through the cracks easily? I have noticed and been through this -‐ my child would have fallen through the cracks if I, her parent, didn’t push for answers/responses. The District has developed interventions including digital, common core aligned programs such as I-‐Ready, remedial reading programs such as Read 180, Reading Plus, tutoring etc, The District provides support for these data driven programs that help teachers to differentiate their instruction and enable all children to catch up to their grade level peers. A strong focus will continue to address the needs of at risk academically and emotionally.
Comments
• May I suggest on-‐going town hall meetings? Perhaps twice a year. You may gain public support and confidence if your local schools and communities are heard.
• Conversation is very important in order to make truly informed decisions. • Better advertising about the town hall meetings. • Charts are deceiving – black words = in place, but are not in place at all schools. • Has this new funding formula been done before? If so, what have been the results? • Success – academic and psycho-‐social is dependent on the village:
o All of us! o Create this environment o Make parents engage and be responsible for the schools’ success
• I’d like to see good/great programs expanded throughout the District. • Make good/great teachers a focus:
o Reward them monetarily and give professional development • Would like to hear/have conversation with all stakeholders. • Better advertising/communication of meetings and task force members. • Black lines – programs in district – are deceptive, not all schools have equal access. • While I understand the 3 dots were to prioritize funding, I hope the LCAP Task Force is
cognoscente of all 8 state priorities. • It is deceptive to indicate programs that are in place and only some schools on charts as
if they are in place at all schools. • Basic services – priority • The issue of attracting and retaining quality teachers to ensure student success is
ongoing o Competitive salary benefits
• Please don’t let Special Education become the red-‐headed step child, and include our children.
• More parent input needs to happen. Teachers will have union/TANLA to advocate. Parents need it too.
• California 8 State Priorities – post on District website.