llea 471b title for italy: the devil, hell, and tales of ...€¦ · • the construction of...
TRANSCRIPT
1
LLEA 471B Title for Italy: The Devil, Hell, and Tales of the Fall: Italian Art and Literature (W-focus pending) [UHM title: LLEA 471 Fantasy and the Fantastic (B) fairies, devils and fantasy] Note: syllabus and title for Italy pending final approval and fomatting. Dates/visits may change due to class scheduling and museum opening times. LdM course XXX FALL 2015 Day: xx-xx am Prof. Kathryn Hoffmann
Credit hours: 3 Contact hours: 45 Additional costs: approx. XX Euro (details at point 10) Teacher contact/availability: available to see students individually by appointment after class xx - xx pm. Contact the professor at: [email protected] 1 - DESCRIPTION This is a course on the construction of images of the underworld and Hell and on images of the Devil in literature, religion and art. The course has special focus on: • The construction of notions of a place after death: in Etruscan necropolises, Greek
and Roman mythology (especially as expressed in Roman mosaic art), and the many depictions of Hell in Italian literature (Dante) and Florentine art
• The Devil in literature, art, and illustrated bibles. The voyage will start in Dante's Inferno and class visits will retain the sense of traveling through visions of Hell while visiting some of the many Florentine images of Hell. Florence has arguably the world's most concentrated and most spectacular collection of paintings, frescoes and mosaics depicting Hell. Sites include: Duomo, Baptistry, Santa Maria Novella (church and museum), San Marco, Brancacci Chapel, Santa Croce, Boboli Gardens, Opera del Duomo Museum, and others. Throughout Florence, frog-headed, chicken-footed, serpent-tailed, and multi-hued demons torture sinners in a mind-boggling number of ways.
• Illustrated Medieval bibles and Renaissance paintings offer a different image of evil; a coiling serpent or a dragon with the head of a pretty young woman tempts Eve to her Fall. This particular image of the Fall while widespread in Europe from the Medieval period until about the seventeenth century, is particularly visible in Italy, especially in Florence, where there are several major examples.
Required and optional excursions to museums, churches, monasteries, the Boboli Gardens, and to see rare illustrated bibles in the national library (pending) are part of this course. Climb the steps of the Duomo to see the fantastic, giant ceiling painting of Hell, count the woman-headed serpents around Florence, learn about themes in art, and visions of the atferlife and Hell, while reading one of Italy's most enduring pieces of literature. 2 - OBJECTIVES, GOALS and OUTCOMES Students will
2
• define and identify images of the Devil and discuss related themes and images in Medieval and Renaissance literature, art, and illustrated Bibles
• research, view similarities among and distinguish among images of the underworld (the afterlife, Hades, Hell, etc.), noting stages in the historical, cultural and religious construction of an afterlife. Sources will include Roman mythology and mosaics, Etruscan necropolises, Catholic Bibles and Italian works of literature (Dante) and Italian art, with an emphasis on Florence (churches, monasteries, and illustrated bibles)
• research, discuss and present different images of the fall including Roman mythology, Judaism and Christianity, and Medieval and Renaissance art. Versions of the fall to include: the fall of the Titans/Giants (Roman myth and a Renaissance vision in Italy in Palazzo Te); Judaism and Christianity (Book of Enoch: fall of the Watcher angels) and with particular emphasis on images of the Fall of Eve and Adam and Eve from paradise in Medieval and Renaissance art, illustrated bibles and prayer books when tempted by a woman-headed serpent
• contribute not only to the understanding of the history of imagination/art in Italy but to its creation by selecting imaginative works/works of art to analyze and/or by contributing new imaginative works created by the students in the context of Florence
• situate the art of Florence in larger contexts in Italy and Europe in order to grasp relationships and differences
• actively engage in the host culture by visiting museums, churches, and cloisters • appreciate variations in viewpoints from the different historical periods under
study
The course is held in English, although students may read Dante in either English or Italian (see point 9). 3 - PREREQUISITES This is a non-introductory interdisciplinary course in the fields of literature, art, myth and religion. Students enrolling must have taken one previous course in literature, art history, history (in any area of historical study, including but not restricted to history, art history, social history, cultural history etc.), anthropology, archaeology, sociology, religion, psychology or mythology, or any other course requiring thought and analysis. On the first day, students will be asked to indicate the previous class taken. 4 – METHOD This class involves lecture, image presentations by professor and students, writing and group discussion. Lectures and discussions are based on the readings, on material and images that will be presented in class, material encountered on-site in class visits and/or in student research. Students must complete all assigned readings before class so that we can discuss them. Course will incorporate some site visits as part of classes. Other visits will be done outside of class with the professor or independently. Readings will be done in English. Dante may be read in Italian, at the option of the student. See point 9.
5 - ASSESSMENT During the semester, students will be evaluated through I. Weekly writing assignments 60% II. Class presentations: two research assignments to be presented in class: 20% III. Participation during classes and site visits = 20%
3
Weekly writing: Students will write at least one page per week. A list of weekly topics, suggestions styles, and options will be provided on the first day of class. Writing assignments must be completed each week (i.e. not left until the end of the semester) as they will often serve as the basis of class discussion, will orient class visits and students' attention during the visits, and/or allow students to explore concepts in ethics and imagination. They will vary in topic, writing style, approach and content, tied to the discussions of the week they are assigned. They will involve one or more of the following: research, active engagement with sites, interpretation and analysis and/or imaginative/creative work that shows comprehension of the problems, texts, artworks, or approaches of the lessons. Two will be presented in class (see section II) and submitted in writing. Weeks for presentation will be weeks 7 and 8 and weeks 13 and14. See detailed instructions on writing handout at the end of the syllabus.
Should issues of academic dishonesty arise (plagiarism, etc.), the professor will refer to the LdM written rules 6 - EXAMS This course has no exams but it has required written and oral work that must be prepared, researched, written, and handed in or presented on the dates indicated on the syllabus.
Remember that the dates of the assignments can NOT be changed for any reason, so please organize your personal schedule accordingly. 7 - EVALUATION and GRADING SYSTEM 60% Weekly writing assignments 20% Class presentations: two assignments to be presented in class 20% Participation during classes and site visits The following grading system will be observed: 0 - 59 = F, 60 - 69 = D, 70 - 72 = C-, 73 - 76 = C, 77 - 79 = C+, 80 - 82 = B-, 83 - 86 = B, 87 - 89 = B+, 90 - 92 = A-, 93 - 100 = A 8 - ATTENDANCE and BEHAVIOUR Mandatory attendance is a primary requirement for a responsible learning experience at LdM. Please note that: • if the student misses THREE classes, the Final grade will be lowered by one full
letter grade. • If more than THREE classes are missed, the final grade will be “F” and NO credits
will be given for this course. It is the responsibility of the student to keep track of his or her absences and to catch up on any missed work due to absences or lateness. Punctuality is mandatory. Students must arrive in class on time: any lateness, leaving class during the lesson without notice, not showing up on time after the break, or leaving earlier, will impact the participation grade and the Final Grade. Three late arrivals or
4
equivalent (10 minutes or more) result in one absence on the attendance count. Missing half a lesson or more will be considered as one full absence. Make-up classes are always mandatory since part of the course program. If a class occasionally creates conflict with another class, the student is required to inform both instructors in advance. The instructors will then share a written excuse for the class going to be missed. Students may NOT keep cell phones or Blackberry systems switched on during class. If your cell phone rings or noise is heard from any electronic device, you will be assigned a special presentation to be done in the next class. Laptop computers may be used for note taking only and with the professor’s prior permission. Wireless internet may not be switched on during classes. Wireless internet may not be switched on during classes unless the professor has authorized an exception in order for students to do an internet search during class on a specific topic. Use of a laptop for any reason other than taking notes will result in your laptop not being allowed into the classroom again. Students are required to behave properly within the school premises. Classrooms are to be left in order and clean. Disabilities and special needs. I want my classroom to be accessible and as comfortable as possible for anyone with any difference, disability, condition, or special need. If there is something I can do to make life easier, please let me know. Students with learning disabilities are required to contact their LdM Advisor or LdM Dean of students. University of Hawaii students: If you feel you need reasonable accommodations because of the impact of a disability, please 1) contact the KOKUA Program (V/T) at 956-7511 or 956-7612 in room 013 of the QLCSS at the University of Hawaii; 2) speak to me privately if you wish to discuss your needs. I will be happy to work with you and the KOKUA Program to meet your access needs related to your documented disability. Academic dishonesty: should issues of academic dishonesty arise (plagiarism and so on), the teacher will refer to the LdM written policy on such matters. 9 - READINGS & SOURCES Required Readings: Books: 1. Dante, Inferno. Trans. A. Mandelbaum (Bantam Classics1982) ISBN-10:
9780553213393 $6.95* 2. Lorenzo Lorenzi: Devils in Art: Florence (available in Florence in English)
Note: Dante may be read in either English or Italian (edition ordered contains both). Class discussion will be in English, NOTE: the required textbooks have already been ordered for you , and they are available at Feltrinelle International, Via Cavour 12. LdM students receive a 15% discount. The required books can be consulted at the LdM school library.
Packet
5
Excerpts from: Book of Enoch; Apocalypse of Moses; Ovid's Metamorphoses; Virgil's Aeneid; illustrated Bibles (numerous), Petrus Comestor's Historia Scholastica; images from archaeological sites; Alice Turner, History of Hell Article: Nona Flores: "'Effigies amicitiae...veritas inimicitiae': Antifeminism in the Iconography of the Woman-Headed Serpent in Medieval and Renaissance Art and Literature" in Nona C. Flores, ed., Animals in the Middle Ages: A Book of Essays, New York: Garland Publishing, Inc., 1996, 167-195
NOTE: The packet may be purchased in Florence at: copystore TBA. 10 - ADDITIONAL COSTS Throughout the course students will spend approx. X Euro as follows: * Euro required for mandatory readings (details at point 9) Approx. * Euro required for visits / trips (details at point 11) 11 - VISITS and TRIPS During the semester there will be visits to museums, galleries and to churches of worldwide importance and fundamental for the course. They are mandatory and count as regular attendance. They usually take place during regular class time (unless specified differently, due to specific time schedules). These visits require students to pay regular entry. The school tries to get reduced or free class entry whenever possible (see list of visits below). The professor will collect the fees (total of X Euro) during the second class. The following visits will be included in the course. Some will be done as part of the class, others will be done by students independently or accompanied by the professor outside of class (see point 13) Planned visits to include: • Duomo, Baptistry, Santa Maria Novella (church and cloister), San Marco, Brancacci
Chapel, Santa Croce, Boboli Gardens, Opera del Duomo Museum, and others • Biblioteca Nazionale Centrale di Firenze (Rare Books) for rare illustrated bibles For detailed dates, addresses, meeting points and entries for mandatory visits with the professor see the daily schedule at point 13. Note: visits may be in our out of class depending on opening times, may be changed or substutited if sites are closed or works are in restoration, etc. For visits/field trips, students must: • be able to walk across Florence at good clip so we do not spend too much time on
transit. If you have a mobility problem, inform the professor and LdM on or before the first day of class
• block off the times for all mandatory excursions and be available for them • know exact meeting points and time for each scheduled visit. Late arrival, getting
lost, no-shows, etc. are considered absences. We may be doing multiple sites on any given excursion and/or opening hours may be changed by the sites without notice. You need to be on time in case of changes beyond the professor’s control. We cannot wait until you arrive.
• wear appropriate clothing for churches: i.e. no shorts or sleeveless shirts for men or women, no t-shirts with offensive slogans, no high heels that will resound on church
6
floors etc. Remember that these remain active houses of worship for others and you must respect them
• behave in respectful and scholarly fashion. Voices should be lowered, especially in churches, where voices should be kept to a whisper so as not to disturb anyone worshipping. In all cases (chuches, museums, gardens, library, etc.), these are intellectual field trips. Running, shouting, loud laughing, and any other behavior that would interrupt the visits of other museum or library patrons or those worshipping in churches will not be tolerated.
12 - MATERIALS NA 13A- CLASS SCHEDULE 1. Sept. X Introduction to course and to the required work. IN CLASS: Hell; notions, incluences, perceptions, preconceptions, questions (among others "Why is there a hydra in Hell on the ceiling of the Duomo?") Pre-‐writing exercise (group exercise in class). Use of brainstorming/quick writing/analytical techniques in small and large groups to stimulate thought, select topics, and write in a less constrained and yet academically rich manner.
From the Afterlife to Hell and Images of the Devil 2. Sept. X. Afterlife, Greek/Roman notions of Hades, tales of Pluto, Proserpina, Ceres To prepare: readings from packet on Roman mythology (Virgil, Ovid) and mosaics, including myths of Prosperpina Ceres and mythology especially related to Sicily (Demeter's Temple at Enna). More modern visions: (Luca Giordano, Rape of Proserpina in Plazao Medici-Riccardi, others) Writing: see writing handout 3. Sept. XX. Other visions of the afterlife: Etruscan Necropolises and Cities of the Dead material in packet and internet researches to be done before class. Discussion in class based on student research. excerpt: Turner, History of Hell Writing to hand in and use in class discussion: see writing handout 4.Sept. XX Dante, Inferno and the Florence Iconography of Hell: Duomo and Baptistry Dante’s Inferno, cantos 1-9 Visit: Baptistry and Duomo (may be scheduled outside class meeting time this week) Writing: see writing handout
7
5. Oct X. Dante, Inferno Dante’s Inferno, cantos 12, 13, 14, 15, 17, 18. 19 Illustrators of the Inferno, introduction Writing to hand in: see writing handout
6. Oct. XX. Dante’s Inferno, cantos 21, 24, 28, 29, 30, 31, 34 Visit: San Marco Writing: see writing handout 7.Oct. XX Dante's illustrators/other visions of Hell: student presentations Writing: see writing handout
xx- xx Fall Break 8. Oct. XX Dante's illustrators:/other visions of Hell student presentation .Writing to hand in: see writing handout Hand in all writing assignments, weeks 2-8 II. FALLS (of the Giants, the Angels, Eve and Adam) 9. Nov. X The fall of the giants and the fall of the watcher angels Roman myth: The Fall of the Giants/Titans A Renaissance version of the Fall of the Titans: Palazzo Te Book of Enoch; the fall of the Watcher Angels. Writing: see writing handout 10.
Nov. XX The Fall of Eve and Adam and the Devil and woman mix: the woman-headed serpent in Medieval Illustrated Bibles and Renaissance Art
8
Reading: Nona Flores (on the woman-headed serpent) imagery: Medieval illustrated bibles visit: National Library rare books (with permission) to be scheduled Independent visit: Boboli Gardens for sculpture of Adam and Eve Writing: see writing handout 11. Nov. XX. The Devil and woman mix: site visits Reading: Petrus Comestor, excerpt, Apocalypse of Moses, excerpt Visit: Brancacci Chapel, meeting at XX 12. nov. X The Devil and woman mix: the woman-headed serpent in Medieval Illustrated Bibles and Renaissance Art, cont. Reading: Nona Flores (on the woman-headed serpent, Comesor and Apocalypse of Moses, continued) Independent visit required this week: S. Maria Novella Writing: see writing handout 13. Dec. X
student presentations: A guide to the underworld and the Devil in Italy (beyond Florence) Writing: see writing handout 14. Dec. XX student presentations continue: A guide to the underworld and the Devil in Italy (beyond Florence) Writing: see writing handout Hand in all writing assignments, weeks 8-14
9
LLEA 471B, Grading Details and Writing Topics Prof. Kathryn Hoffmannn I. Written work (60% of final grade). See list of weekly topics/styles below, pp. 12-‐14. For the first half of the semester, written work will be handed in every other week. I will grade/comment on it and return it. You may rewrite to attempt to improve your grade. See detailed syllabus (under point 13A class schedule) for days on which assignments are to be handed in and/or presented in class. Grading breakdown for written work: 25% Development, amount of work, degree of completion of assignment
• Excellent: student does significantly more than expected, shows time and effort were put into writing
• Good: student writes more than the minimum • Acceptable: student does the minimum number of questions/topics • Unacceptable: does not complete, completes partially, or answers are too sketchy
for full credit 25% Thought. Complexity, depth, elegance of reflection and/or imagination
• Excellent: writing shows impressive depth of thought, impressive ability to handle a complex topic. Uses complex examples or ideas rather than simple ones. Shows ability to find, reveal or construct concepts (depending on topic) with some elegance. No significant weaknesses in any area.
• Good: writing shows solid depth of thought, above-‐average ability to handle a complex topic. Avoids simple examples or ideas. Shows ability to find, reveal or construct concepts (depending on topic) well. No significant weaknesses or some minor weakness that does not affect overall quality.
• Acceptable: competent with enough examples or thought. Choices are not bad, but rather obvious. Could use more examples and/or better development. Might or might not have errors.
• Unacceptable: major errors, inability to handle basic concepts of the course, failure to do any research or demonstrate attention during site visits
25% Substance: Research, comprehension of material, attention to details during site visits, and/or imaginative content (depending on weekly topic). Although writing topics and styles will vary, the following categories will apply:
• Excellent: Work is impressive in one or more of the following areas depending on the topic and assignment: number of examples and detail, providing evidence of acute attention during a visit; outstanding content; unusually solid grasp and use of course material; relies on significant sources; adds important material/ knowledge or vision to the course.
• Good: Work is above average and generally solid in one or more of the following areas depending on the topic and assignment: number of examples and detail, providing evidence of sustained attention during a visit; above-‐minimal content; solid grasp and use of course material; relies on significant sources; adds material or knowledge or vision to the course.
• Acceptable: Work is minimal but sufficient in one or more of the following areas depending on the topic and assignment: number of examples and detail, providing evidence of at least minimal attention during a visit; content that may have some flaws yet be acceptable; minimal expected use of course material ; relies on sources of uneven quality; adds some but not an impressive amount material or knowledge to the course.
10
• Unacceptable: Work is not handed or is insufficient in one or more of the following areas depending on the topic and assignment: number of examples and detail; does not provide evidence of at least minimal attention during a visit; content has too many flaws to be acceptable; does not show grasp or use of course material; relies on no sources or on sources of uneven quality; does not seek to or fails to contribute material or knowledge or vision to the course.
25% Style and mechanics • Excellent: Style is impressively academic (i.e. no contractions, use of "I" or "we" for
academic writing), or does excellent job fitting any other assigned style (journalism, guide-‐book, creative writing, etc.). No (or extremely limited) grammatical, spelling, or punctuation errors. Writing is impressively clear, logical, structured and readable.
• Good: Style is academic (i.e. no contractions, use of "I" or "we" for academic writing) or shows more than the minimal effort and success at fitting any other assigned style (journalism, guide-‐book, creative writing, etc.). Limited grammatical errors, spelling, or punctuation errors. Writing is clear, logical, structured and readable.
• Acceptable: Style is academic or conforms to any other assigned style (journalism, guide-‐book, creative writing, etc.). May have some limited grammatical errors, spelling, or punctuation errors. Writing is mostly clear and readable but may have some flaws in structure or logic.
• Unacceptable: Writing is non-‐academic, does not fit style assigned, may have significant grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors and/or is difficult to read.
Assignments must be done on the days they are assigned as they may be collected, used as the basis of that class discussion, or shared in class for the benefit of the learning of other students. Work may be rewritten in an attempt to improve the grade. I will have regular hours for student meetings and conferences and will make extra time available if needed. Students will have two dates on which to submit all work done through that point. See the specific directions on the writing sheet. Late work is not acceptable. Grade will be lowered one full grade for every day work is late. II. Presentations (20% of final grade) How presentations are graded: 33% Content
• Excellent: student presents an outstanding amount of material succinctly in large or small groups, as directed. Points are clear and material is unquestionably pertinent to class topic
• Good: student presents a significant amount of material succinctly in large or small groups, as directed. Points are clear and material is visibly pertinent to class topic
• Acceptable -‐ presents a minimal amount of material. Pertinence of topic may be there, but may not be completely clear to professor and/or peers.
• Unacceptable: failure to present, presentation of a topic not pertinent to class discussion, topic unclearly linked to class or insufficiently developed
33% Preparation
• Excellent: has done an outstanding job in preparation. Student has mastered the content of the presentation and can handle questions. If student cannot handle a question, can direct audience to a source.
11
• Good: has done a solid but not outstanding job in preparation. Student has mastered the content of the presentation and can handle questions. If student cannot handle a question, can direct audience to a source.
• Acceptable: Preparation is minimal but acceptable. Student has mastered an acceptable amount of content of the presentation but could have done more. Will be able to answer some questions, but may make errors or display lack of knowledge or cannot direct audience to another source.
33% Style and mechanics of the presentation. Voice level and clarity, eye contact, observes time, uses images as required
• Excellent: Speaks loudly and clearly and is very comprehensible to others. Uses eye contact extremely well. Speaks well, consulting notes, but without reading. Fills the time allotted without going over. Outstanding illustrations within time limit.
• Good: speaks clearly and is comprehensible. Speaks well, but may have to rely on notes more than those in the "excellent" category. Eye contact sufficient. Fills time allotted without going over. Solid illustrations.
• Acceptable -‐ At least minimal in poise; may unclear in voice or somewhat uneven in eye contact, may be asked to raise voice. Uses at least most of the time. Tries not to read. Does not go over time allotted. Enough illustrations to be acceptable.
• Unacceptable: failure to present, presentation of a topic not pertinent to class discussion, unclearly linked to class or insufficiently developed, failure to speak comprehensibly, failure to have enough material for the time or sufficient illustrations to make point clear
III. Class participation (20% of final grade) Students are expected to be active participants in class and to contribute to the construction of knowledge within the classroom.
• Excellent: student's contribution is regular, adds depth to the class and makes new knowledge. Student is aware of other students and other thinkers and allows for other views. While contribution is important, the student does not monopolize the discussion or fail to notice when others want to/try to communicate.
• Good: student's contribution is regular and solid and adds some material to the class. Student is aware of other students and other thinkers and allows for other views. The student does not monopolize the discussion or fail to notice when others want to/try to communicate.
• Acceptable: Student's contribution is at least minimal. It may be good at times but somewhat irregular, or uneven in its contribution to course knowledge. Student is aware of other students and other thinkers and allows for other views. The student does not monopolize the discussion or fail to notice when others want to/try to communicate .
• Unacceptable: Attendance or contribution to class discussions is irregular, below minimal in number of contributions or depth of contribution to knowledge in the course. Student may demonstrate lack of knowledge of the readings, or lack of awareness of students around him/her. Failure to participate in discussions, monopolization of discussion, or failure to acknowledge/consider other views, will result in an unacceptable grade.