Literatur

Abric, J. C. (1976). Jew:, conjlits et representations sociales. These de Doctorat es Lettres. Aix-en Provence:

Universite de Provence.

Abric, J. C. (1984). A theoretical and experimental approach to the study of social representations in a situa­

tion of interaction. In R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.). Social Representations (S. 169-183). Cambridge

et al: Cambridge University Press.

Abric, J. C. (1998). The central core: A structural and cognitive perspective. Vortrag auf der Konferenz "So­

cial representations: Introductions and Explorations" New York: CUNY (unverOffentlicht).

Adorno, Th. W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D. J. & Sanford, R. N. (1949). The Authoritarian Person­

ality. New York. Harper's.

Aiessani, Y. & Bidaud, I. (1998). Evolution de la representation sociale de l'alcool chez des alcooliques sous

l'effet d'une therapie basee sur un dispositif de communication. Cahiers Internationaw: de Psycholo­

gie Sociale. No 40. S. 10-24.

Aiessani, Y.; Bonardi, C. & Guelfucci, B. (1990). Representation sociale et noyau central: problemes de me­

thode. Revue Internationale de Psycholpgie Sociale. VoI3(3}. S. 335-356.

Allport, F. H. (1920). The influence of group upon association and thought. Journal of Experimental Psy­

chology. 3. S. 159-82.

Allport, F. H. (1924). Social Psychology. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

Allport, G.W. (1954). The historical background of modern social psychology. In G. Lindzey & E. Aronson

(Eds.). Handbook of social psychology: (3M Ed.). Hillsdale New Jersey, London: Lawrence Erlbaum

1985.

Ansoff, R. (1993). Finding an home for a psychology of volition. Theory & Psychology. VoI3(3}. S.323-

336.

Ansoff, R. (1996). How can there be personal agency without an ontology of the individual? Theory & Psy­

chology. VoI6(3}. S.539-544.

Archer, J. & ~arker, S. (1994). Social representations of aggression in children. Aggressive-Behavior. Vol

20(2}. S.l01-1I4.

Aries, P (1962). Centuries of childhood: A social history offamily life. Cambridge: Cambridge University

Press.

Aristoteles (o.J.). PoetilL Die Lehrschriften. hrsg. von P. Gohlke. Bd. III. Paderborn: Ferdinand SchOningh.

1959.

Ash, M. G. (1990). Ein Kommentar zum Aufsatz Kenneth Gergens aus historischer und wissenschaftstheore­

tischer Sicht. Psychologische Rundschau 41. S. 200-205.

Ash, S. E. (1956). Studies of independence and conformity. Psychological Monographs 70. S. 1-10.

Augoustinos, M. (1995). Ideologie und Soziale Reprlisentationen. In U. Flick (Hrsg.). Psychologie des Sozia-

len. Repriisentationen in Wissen und Sprache. Reinbeck bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.

Austin, J. L. (1962). How to do things with words. New York: Oxford University Press.

Averill, J. R. & Nunley, E. P. (1992). Voyages of the heart. New York: Free Press.

Averill, J. R. (1982). Anger and Agression: An essay on emotion. New York: Springer Verlag.

218 Literatur

Averill, J. R. (1985). The social construction of emotion: With special refeence to love. In K. J. Gergen & K.

E. Davis (Eds.). The social construction of the person. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Badinter, E. (1980). Mother love: Myth and reality. New York: Macmillan.

Bakhtin, M. (1981). The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.

Bar-Tal, D. & Kruglanski, A. W. (Eds.) (1988a). The Social Psychology of Knowledge. New York: Cam­

bridge University Press.

Bar-Tal, D. & Kruglanski, A.W. (l988b). The social psychology of knowledge: Its scope an meaning. In D.

Bar-Tal & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.). The Social Psychology of Knowledge. New York: Cambridge

University Press.

Bartlett, F. C. (1932). Remembering. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.

Bass, B. M. (1955). Authoritarianism or acquiescence. Journalfor Abnormal Social Psychology 51. S. 616-

623.

Bauer, M. W. & Gaskell, G. (1999). Towards a paradigm for research on social representations. Journal for

the Theory of Social Behaviour. Vol 29(2). S. 163-186.

Baumrind, D. (1964). Some thoughts on the ethics of research: After reading Milgrams behavioral study of

obedience. American Psychologist 19. S. 412-423.

Bayer, B. & Shotter, J. (Eds.) (1998). Reconstructing the psychological subject: Bodies, practices and tech­

nologies. London: Sage. (Inquiries in social construction).

Bayer, B. (1998). Introduction: Reenchanting constructionist inquiries. In B. Bayer & J. Shotter (Eds.). Re­

constructing the psychological subject: Bodies, practices and technologies. London: Sage. (Inquiries

in social construction).

Bazermann, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

Beall, A. E. (1993). A social constructionist view of gender. In A. E. Beall & R.J. Sternberg (Eds.). The psy­

chology of gender. (S. 127-147). New York: Guilford Press.

Berger, P & Luckmann, Th. (1966). Die gesellschaftliche Konstruktion der Wirklichkeit: eine Theorie der

Wissensoziologie. (17. Aufiage). Frankfurt am Main: Fischer 2000.

Billig, M. (1993). StUdying the thinking society: Social representation, rhetoric and atitudes. In G. M.

Bt'eakwell & D. V. Canter. (Eds.). Empirical approaches to social representations. (S. 39-62). New

York: Oxford University Press.

Billig, M. (1988). Social representation, objectification and anchoring: A rhetorical analysis. Social­

Behaviour. Vol 3(1). S. 1-16.

Bohan, J. S. (1990). Social constructionism and contextual history: An expanded approach to the history of

psychology. Teaching of Psychology. Vol 17(2). S. 82-89.

Boje, D. M.; Gephart, R. P. & Thatchenkery, T. J. (Eds.) (1996). Postmodern Management and Organization

Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Bonardi, C.; Roussiau, N. & Larrue, J. (1998). Approche sociocognitive d'une dynamique representationnelle

et de ses determinants. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale, No 38. S. 12-34.

Bornewasser, M.; Hesse, F. W.; Mielke, R. & Schmidt, H. D. (1980). Einleitung der Obersetzer. In M.

Deutsch & R. M. Krauss. (1965). Theorien der Sozialpsychologie. (2. Aufiage). Eschborn bei Frank­

furt am Main: Verlag Dietmar Klotz GmbH 1997.

Literatur 219

Botschner, J. V. (1995). Social constructionism and the pragmatic entente: A reply to Osbeck. Theory & Psy­

chology. VoI5(I}. S. 145-151.

Bourgeat, G. (1999). Predictivite, efficacite et centralite des elements d'une representation sociale. Cahiers

Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale. No 42. S. 75-89.

BouB, W. & Honneth, A. (Hrsg.) (1982). Sozia/forschung als Kritik. Zum sozialwissenschajtlichen Potential

der Kritischen Theoril!. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Breakwell, G.M. & Canter D.V. (l993b). Aspects of methodology and their implications for the study of so­

ciaJ representations. In G. M. BreakweU & D. V. Canter (Eds.). Empirical approaches to social repre­

sentations. (S. I-II). New York: Oxford University Press.

Breakwell, G. M. & Canter D. V. (Eds.) (1993a). Empirical approaches to social representations. New York:

Oxford University Press.

Breakwell, G. M. (1993); Integrating Paradigms, methodological implications. In G. M. Breakwell & D. V.

Canter. (Eds.). Empirical approaches to social representations (S. 180-201). New York: Oxford Uni­

versity Press.

Bruder, K. J. (1993). Subjektivittit und Postmoderne. Der Disleurs der Psychologie. Frankfurt am Main:

Suhrkamp.

Bruner, J. (1986). Actual minds, possible worlds. Cambridge: Havard University Press.

Bruner, J. (1990a). Acts o/meaning. Cambridge: Havard University Press.

Bruner, J. (I990b). Comment on Kenneth Gergen's 'The construction of self in the post-Modern Age.' Psy­

chologische Rundschau 41. S. 206-207.

BUhler, K. (1927). Die Krise der Psychologie. Reprint bei Ulstein 1978.

Burkitt, I. (1996). Social and personal constructs: A division left unresolved: Comment. Theory & Psychol­

ogy. VoI6(1}. S. 71-77.

Burkitt, I. (1998). Bodies of knowledge: Beyond cartesian views of persons, selves and mind. Journal/or the

Theory o/Social Behavior Vol 28(1}. S. 63-82.

Burr, V. (1995). An introduction to social constructionism. Florence, KY: Taylor and FrancislRoutledge.

Calegari, P. (1991). Le rappresentazioni sociali e la costruzione della conoscenza. Giornale Italiano di Psi­

cologia Vol 18(1}. S.59-77.

Campbell, A. & Muncer, St. (1987). Models of anger and aggression in the sociaJ talk of women and men.

Journal/or the Theory o/Social Behaviour. Vol 17(4). S. 489-511.

Campbell, A. & Muncer, St. (1994): Sex differences in aggression: Social representation and social roles.

British Journal o/Socia! Psychology. Vol 33(2). S. 233-240.

Campbell, A.; Muncer, St. & Gorman, B. (l993). Sex and social representations of aggression: A communal­

agentic analysis. Aggressive-Behavior. Vol 19(2). S. 125-135.

Campbell, A.; Sapochnik, M. & Muncer, St. (1997). Sex differences in aggression: Does sociaJ representa­

tion mediate fonn of aggression? British Journal o/Social Psychology. Vol 36(2). S.161-171.

Campbell, J. (1956). The hero with a thousand/aces. New York: Meridian. (Original 1949).

Campos, G. P. (l998). Social representation and the ontology of the social world: Bringing another significa­

tion into the dialogue. Culture & Psychology. Vol 4(3). S. 331-347.

Camussi, E. (1998). Donne e lavoro nei quotidiani: descrizioni al maschile e al femminile. Ricerche di Psico­

logia. VoI22(4). S. 69-86.

220 Literatur

Carnap, R. (\928). Der logische Atifbau der Welt. Berlin-Schlachtensee: Weltkreis-Verlag.

Carnap, R. (1932). Uberwindung der Metaphysik durch logische Analyse der Sprache. Erkenntnis. Bd 2, H.

4. S. 219-241.

Carogati, F., Emiliani, F. & Molinari, L. (1989). Being a mother is not enough. Theories and images in the

social representations of childhood. Revue Internationale de Psychologie Sociale. T3, No.3. S. 289-

306.

Casado, E. & Martinez de Taboada, C. (\ 998). La interaccion pedagogica como objeto de representaciones

sociales. Boletin deSicologiaEsponola. Vol 61. S. 31-45.

Chazaud, P. (\ 980). Les representations sociales du benevolat: de l'excellence a la marginalite. Bulletin de

Psychologie. Vol 33(347). S. 957-967.

Clemence, A.; Doise, W.; Silvana de Rosa, A. & Gonzalez, L. (\ 995). La representation des droits de

l'homme: Une recherche intemationale sur l'etendue et les limites de l'universalite. International Jour­

naloJPsychology. Vol 30(2). S. 181-212.

Cocol, J. P. (1969). Notre terminologique sur I'emploi de quelques expressions concemantles activites et

processus cognitifs en psychologie sociale. Bulletin de Psychologie 23. S.63-71.

Codol, J. P (\ 975). On the System of representation in a group situation. European Journal oj Social Psy­

chology 4(3). S. 343-365.

Codol, J. P. (1984). On the system of representations in a artificial social situation. In R. Farr & S. Moscovici

(Eds.). Social representations. (S. 239-253). Cambridge et al: Cambridge University Press.

Comby, L.; Devos, T. & Deschamps, J. C. (1993). Representations sociales du sida et attitudes a l'egard des

personnes seropositives. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale. No 17. S. 6-33.

Comte, A. (1844). Rede iiber den Geist des Positivismus. Ubers. und eingel. von Iring Fetscher. Hamburg:

Meiner 1994.

Cooperrider, D. (1996). Resources of getting appreciative inquiry started. OD Practioner 28. S. 23-34.

Crabb, P.B. & Bielawski, D. (1994). The social representation of material culture and gender in children's

books. Sex-Roles. Vol 30(1-2) S. 69-79

Craib, I. (1998). Sozialer Konstruktivismus als soziale Psychose. Zeitschrift for Individualpsychologie. Vol

23(4). S. 375-390.

de Souza, L. & Trindade, Z. A. (1990). A representacao social das atividades profissionais do psicologo em

segmentos de classe media e baixa, na cidade de Vitoria, ES. Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa. Vol 6(3).

S.267-279.

Descartes, R. (1870). Meditationen iiber die Grundlagen der Philosophie. Hamburg: Meiner 1960.

Deutsch, M. & Kraus, R. M. (1965). Theorien der Sozialpsychologie. Frankfurt am Main: Eschbom 1997.

Deutscher, I. (1984). Choosing anchestors: Some consequences of the selection from intellectual traditions.

In R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.). Social representations. (S. 71-100). Cambridge: Cambridge Uni­

versity Press.

Dilthey, W. (1910). Der Aujbau der geschichtlichen Welt in den Geisteswissenschajien. (3. Auflage). Frank­

furt am Main: Suhrkamp 1990.

Doise, W. (1984). Social representations, intergroup experiments and levels of anillysis. In R. Farr & S.

Moscovici (Eds.). Social representations. (S. 255-268). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Doise, W. (1985). Les representations sociales: definition d'un concept. Connexions. No 45. S.243-253.

Literatur 221

Duise, W. (1986). Levels of explanation in social psychology. New Yark: Cambridge University Press.

Duise, W. (1989). Constructivism in social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology. Vol 19. S.

389-400.

Duise, W. (1993). Debating Social Representations. In G. M. Breakwell & D. V. Canter. (Eds.). Empirical approaches to social representations. (S. 157-170). New York: Oxford University Press.

Doise, W. (1998). Social representation in personal identity. In St Worchel & J. F. Morales (Eels.). Social identity: international perspectives. (S. 13-23). London: Sage.

Duise, W.; Clemence, A. & Lorenzi-Cioldi, F. (1993). The quantitative analysis of social representations. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf. (European monographs in social psychology).

Doise, W.; Spini, D.; Jesuin~, J. C. & Ng, S. H. (1994). Values and perceived conflicts in the social represen­

tations of human rights: Feasibility ofa cro5S-i18tional study. Schweizerische ZeitschriftftJr Psychola­gie und ihre Anwendungen. Vol 53(4). S. 240-25!.

Douglas, M. (1986). How institutions think. London: Routledge Kegan Paul.

Durkheim, E. (1895). Die RegeJn der soziologischen Methode. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1976.

Durkheim, E. (1897). Der Selbstmord (7. Auflage). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1999.

Durkheim, Eo, (1898). Individuelle und kollektive Vorstellungen. In ders. Soziologie und Philosophie. Frank­

furt am Main: Suhrkamp 1967.

Durkheim, E. (1912). Die elementaren Formen des religiosen Lebens. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp: 198!.

Duveen, G. (1996). The development of social representations of gender. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Vol 35(3). S. 256-262.

Duveen, G. & Lloyd, B. (1993). An ethnographic approach to social representation. In G. M. Breakwell & D.

V. Canter (Eds.). Empirical approaches to social representations. New York: Oxford University

Press.

Duveen, G. & Lloyd, B. (Eds.) (1990a). Social representations and the development of knowledge. Cam­

bridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Duveen, G. & Lloyd, B. (1990b). Introduction. In. dies. (Eds.). Social representations and the development of knowled~e. (S. 1-10). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Eberle, T. S. (1993). Social psychology and the sociology of knowledge. Revista de Psicologia Social Apli­cada. VoI8(1). S.5-13.

Echebarria-Ecbabe, A.; Guede, E. F.; Sanjuan-Guillen, C. & Valencia-Garate, J. F. (1992). Social represen­

tations of drugs, causal judgment and social perception. European Journal of Social Psychology. Vol 22(1). S. 73-84.

Eckardt, G. (1979). Entstehung und Entwicklung der bOrgerlichen Sozialpsychologie. In H. Hiebsch & M.

Vorwerg et al. (Hrsg.). Sozialpsychologie. (S. 42~68). Berlin: VEB Dt. Verlag der Wissenschaften.

Edwards, D.; Ashmore, M. & Potter, J. (1995). Death and furniture: The rhetoric, politics and theology of

bottom line arguments against relativism. History of the Human Sciences 8(2). S.25-49.

Emiliani, F. (1982). Azione concreta e rappresentazione sociale: uno studio su operatrici di asilo nido. Gior­nale Italiano di Psicologia. Vol 9(1). S. 143-16!.

Emler, N. (1987). Socio-moral development from the perspective of social representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. Vol 17(4). S.371-388.

222 Literatur

Emler, N. & Ohana, J. (1992). Reponses au prejudice: representations sociales enfantines. Bulletin de Psy­

chologie. Vol 45(405). S.223-231.

Emler, N.; Ohana, J. & Moscovici, S. (1987). Children's beliefs about institutional roles: A cross-national

study of representations of the teacher's role. British Journal of Educational Psychology. Vol 57(1). S.

26-37.

Engestrom, Y. & Middelton, D. (1992). Communal cognition in the workplace. London: Sage.

Esken, F. & Heckmann, P. (1999). Generelle Einfilhrung: BewuJltsein und Reprllsentation. In dies. (Hrsg.).

Bewufltsein und Repriisentation. Paderbom: mentis.

Farr, R. (1981). The social origin of the human mind: A historical note. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.). Social Cogni­

tion. (S. 247-25'7). London: Academic Press. (European Monographs in Social Psychology 26).

Farr, R. (1984). Social representations: Their role in the design and execution oflaboratory experiments. In

R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.). Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Farr, R. (1987). Social representations: A French tradition of research. Journal for the Theory of Social Be­

haviour. Vol 17(4). S. 343-369.

Farr, R. (1989). From collective to social representations: Aller et retour. Culture & Psychology. Vol 4(3). S.

275-296.

Farr, R. (1990). Social representations as widespread beliefs. In C. Fraser & G. Gaskell (Eds.). The Social

Psychological Study of Widespread Belieft. Oxford: Claredon Press.

Farr, R. (1993). Theory and method in the study of social representations. In G. M. Breakwell & D. V. Canter

(Eds.). Empirical approaches to social representations. (S. 15-38). New York: Oxford University

Press.

Farr, R. (1996). The roots of modern social psychology 1872 - 1954. Oxford/Cambridge MA.: Blackwell

Publishers.

Farr, R. & Moscovici, S. (Eds.) (1993). Social Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Faucheux, C. & Moscovici, S. (1968). Self-esteem and exploitative behaviour in a game against chance and

nature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 8(1). S. 83-88.

Ferron, C. (1997). Body image in adolescence: Cross-cultural research: Results of the preliminary phase of a

quantitative survey. Adolescence. Vol 32(127). S. 735-745.

Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson.

Fishbane, M.D. (2001). Relational narratives of the self. Family Process. Vol 40(3). S. 273-291.

Fisher, H. (1995). Whose right is it to define the self? Theory & Psychology. Vol 5(3) S. 323-352.

Fivush, R. (1991). The social construction of personal narratives. Merill-Palmer Quarterly. Vol 37 Nr.l. S.

59-81.

Flament, C. (1994). Consensus salience and necessity in social representations. Papers on Social Representa­

tions 3. S. 97-105.

Fleck, L. (1935). Entstehung und Entwicklung einer wissenschaftlichen Tatsache: Einfohrung in die Lehre

vom Denkstil und Denkkollektiv. (3. Auflage). Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1994.

Flick, U. (Hrsg.) (1995). Psychologie des Sozialen. Repriisentationen in Wissen und Sprache. Reinbeck bei

Hamburg: Rowohlt.

Flick, U. (1996). Psychologie des technisierten Alltags. Soziale Konstruktion und Repriisentation technischen

Wandels. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

Literatur 223

Flick, U. (1998). Introduction: Social Representation in knowledge and language as approaches to a psychol­ogy of the social. In ders (Ed.). The psychology o/the social. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Fonow, M. M. & Cook, J. A. (Eds.) (1991). Beyond methodology: Feminist scholarship as lived research Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Forgas, J. P. (Eds.) (198Ia). Social Cognition: Perspectives on everyday understanding. London: Academic

Press. (European Monographs in Social Psychology 26).

Forgas, J. P. (1981b). Social episodes and group milieu: A study in social cognition. British Journal o/Social Psychology. Vol 20(2). S. 77..!d7.

Foucault, M. (1961). Wahnsinn und Gesellschaft: Eine Geschichte des Wahns im Zeitalter der Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: S:.tmaunp 1995.

Frank, M. (1984). Was ist Neostrukturalismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Fraser, C & Gaskell, G. (Eels.) (1984). The social psychological study o/widespread beliefs. Oxford: Clare­

don Press

Freeman, M. (1995). Groping in the light. Theory & Psychology. Vol 5(3). S. 353-360.

Freeman, M. (1999). Culture, narrative, and the poetic construction of selfhood. Journal 0/ Constructivist Psychqlogy. Vol 12(2). S. 99--116.

Freye, N. (1957). Anatomy 0/ criticism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Frindte, W. (1998). Soziale Konstruktionen. Sozialpsychologische Vorlesungen. OpladenlWiesbaden: West­deutscher Verlag.

Gabriel, G. ( 1998). Gruntlprobleme der Erkenntnistheorie; von Descartes zu Wittgenstein. Paderborn et al:

Schilningh. (UTB Wissenschaft 1743).

Gadamer, H. G. (1960). Wahrheit und Methode. (6. Auflage). Ttlbingen: Mohr 1990.

Galang, M. C. & Ferris, G. R. (1997). Human resource department power and influence through symboliCal:­tion. Human Relations. Vol 50(1 I). S. 1403-1426.

Galli, I. & Nigro, G. (1987). The social representation of radioactivity among Italian children. Social Science Information. VoI26(3). S. 535-549.

Galli, I. & Nigro, G. (1992). La representation sociale du pouvoir chez les enfants. Bulletin de Psychologie. VoI45(405). S.217-222.

Gallie, W. B. (1964). Philosophy and the historical understanding. London: Chatto & Windus.

Gantt, E. E. (1996). Social constructionism and the ethics of hedonism. Journal o/Theoretical and Philoso­phical Psychology. Vol 16(2). S. 123-140.

Gergen, K. J. (1965a). Effects of interaction goals and personality feedback on the presentation of self. Jour­nal of Personality and Social Psychology 1(5). S.413-424.

Gergen, K. J. (1969a). Self theory and the process of self -observation. Journal o/Nervous & Mental Disease. Vol/48(4). S.437-448.

Gergen, K. J. (1969b). The psychology o/behavior exchange. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Gergen, K. J. (1971). The concept 0/ self. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Gergen, K. J. (1972). Multiple identity: The healthy, happy human being wears many masks. Psychology To­day. Vol. 5(12). S. 31-35,64-66.

224 Literatur

Gergen, K. J. (1973). Social psychology as history. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. Vol 26(2).

S.309-320.

Gergen, K. J. (1976). Social psychology science and history. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. Vol

2(4). S. 373-383.

Gergen, K. J. (1978). Experimentation in social psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology 8. S.

507-527.

Gergen, K. J. (1982). Taward transformation in social knowledge. (2.Auflage). London: Sage. 1994.

Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modem psychology. American Psychologist.

Vol 40(3). S. 266-275.

Gergen, K. J. (1986). Experimentieren und der Mythos des Unverbesserlichen. In V. Sarris & A. Paraduci

(Hrsg.). Die Zukunjt der Experimentellen Psychologie. Berlin: VEB Verlag der Wissenschaften.

Gergen, K. J. (1987). Toward selfas relationship. In K. Yardley & T. Honess (Eds.). Self and identity: Psy­

chosocial perspectives. (S. 53-63). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Gergen, K. J. (1988). Knowledge and social process. In D. Bar-Tal & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.) The Social

Psychology of Knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Gergen, K. J. (1989). Social psychology an the wrong revolution. European Journal of Social Psychology 19.

S.463-484.

Gergen, K. J. (1990). Die Konstruktion des Selbst im Zeitalter der Postmodeme. Psychologische Rundschau

41. S. 19H99.

Gergen, K. J. (1991). The saturated self. Dilemmas of identity in contemporary life. New York: Basic Books.

Gergen, K. J. (1993). Theory in historical context. In H. V. Rappard & van Strien, P. J. (Eds.). Annals of

theoretical psychology. Vol 8. (S. 245-248). New York: Plenum Press.

Gergen, K. J. (1994a). Realities and relationships. Soundings in social construction. Cambridge, MA: Ha­

vard University Press.

Gergen, K. J. (1994b). Exploring the postmodem: Perils or potentials? American Psychologist. Vol 49(5) S.

412-416.

Gergen, ~. J. (1994c). Mind, text, and society: Self-memory in social context. In U. Neisser & R. Fivush

(Eds.). The remembering self: Construction and accuracy in the self-narrative. (S. 78--104). New

York: Cambridge University Press.

Gergen, K. J. (l995a). Postmodemism as a humanism. Humanistic-Psychologist. Vol 23(1). S.71-82.

Gergen, K. J. (1995b). Social construction and the educational process. In L. P. Steffe & J. E. Gale (Eds.).

Constructivism in education. (S. 17-39). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gergen, K. J. (1996). Metaphor and monophony in the twentieth-<:entury psychology og Emotions. In C.F.

Graumann & K. J. Gergen (Eds.). Historical Dimensions of Psychological Discourse. (S. 6(}-82).

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Gergen, K. J. (1997a). Social psychology as social construction. The emerging vision. In C. McGarty & A. S.

Haslam (Eds.) (1997). The massage of social psychology: perspectives on mind in society. Cambridge,

UK: Blackwell.

Gergen, K. J. (l997b). The place of the psyche in a constructed world. Theory & Psychology Vol 7(6). S.

723-746.

Literatur 225

Gergen, K J. (1998). The ordinary, the original, and the believable in psychology's construction of the per­

son. In B. Bayer & J. Shotter (Eds.). Reconstructing the psychological subject: Bodies, practices and

technologies. London: Sage. (Inquiries in social construction).

Gergen, K. J. (1999a). An invitation to social construction. Lodon: Sage.

Gergen, K J. (l999b). Agency: Social construction an relational action. Theory & Psychology. VoI9(I}. S.

113-115.

Gergen, K J. (2000). Emerging challenges redux. Theory & Psychology. Vol 10(1). S. 23- 30.

Gergen, K J. (2001). Construction in contention. Towards consequential resolutions. Theory & Psychology.

VoIII(3}.S.419-432.

Gergen, K J. & Breger, I. (1965). Two forms of inference and problems in the assessment of creativity. Pro-

ceedings oJthe Annual Convention oJthe American Psychological Association 1965. S. 215-216.

Gergen, K. J. & Davis, K'E. (1985). The social construction oJthe person. New York: Springer.

Gergen, K J. & Gergen, M. (1986). Social Psychology. New York: Springer.

Gergen, K J. & Gergen, M. (1988). Narrative and the self as relationship. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.). Advances in

Experimental Social Psychology Vol 21 (S. 17-56). New York Academic Press.

Gergen, K J. & Marlowe, D. (1970). Personality and social behavior. Cambridge, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Gergen, K. J. & Morse, S. J. (1967). Self-<:onsistency: Mesurement and validation. Procedings oJthe Annual

Convention oj the American Psychological Association 1967, 2. S. 207-208.

Gergen, K J. & Semin, G. (Eds.) (1990). Everyday understanding. London. Sage. (Inquiries in Social Con­

struction).

Gergen, K. J. & Taylor, M. G. (1969). Social expetancy and self presentation in a status hierachy. Journal oj

experimental Social Psychology. VoI5(1}. S. 79-92.

Gergen, K. J. & Thatchenkery, T. J. (1996). Organization science as social construction: Postmodem poten­

tials. Journal oj Applied Behavioral Sciences. VoI32(4}. S. 356-377.

Gergen, K. J. & Wishnov, B. (1965). Others' self-evaluations and interaction anticipation as determinants of

self-presentation. Journal oj Personality & Social Psychology. VoI2(3}. S. 348-358.

Gergen, K J~ Gergen, M. M. & Meter, K. (1972). Individual orientations to prosocial behavior. Journal oj

Social Issues. Vol 28(3}. S. 105-130.

Gergen, K J.; Hoffmann, L. & Anderson, H. (1997). Diagnose - ein Desaster. Ein konstruktionistischer Dia­

log. ZeitschriflforSystemische Therapie. VoII5(4}. S.224-240.

Gergen, M. (1989). Induction and construction: Teetering between worlds. European Journal oJSocial Psy­

chology. Vo1I9(5} S. 431-437.

Gergen, M. (1995). Postmodem, post-<:artesian positionings on the subject of psychology. Theory & Psy­

chology. VoI5(3}. S. 361-368.

Gergen, M. (2001). Feminist reconstructions in psychology: Narrative, gender, and performance. Thousand

Oaks, CA: Sage.

Gergen, M. (1988). Toward a feminist metatheory and methodology in the social sciences. In Dies (Ed.).

Feminist thought and the structure oJknowledge. New York: New York University Press.

Gergen, M.; Gergen, K J. & Morse, S. J. (1972). Correlates of marijuana use among college students. Jour­

naloJ Applied Social Psychology. Vol 2(1). S. 1-16.

226 Literatur

Gerson, K. (1997). The social construction of fatherhood. In T. Arendell (Ed.). Contemporary parenting:

Challanges and issues. Understandingfamilies. Vol. 9. (S. 119-153). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Giarmo, C. M. (1997). Are there commonalties hetween modern and postmodern philosophies? An examina­

tion of the self and knowledge. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. VoI17(1}. S.

67-78.

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory ofstructuration. Cambridge, UK: Poli­

ty.

GmOnder, U. (1985). Kritische Theorie. Horkheimer. Adorno. Marcuse. Habermas. Stuttgart: Metzlersche

Verlagsbuchbandlung.

Godow, R. A. (1976). Social psychology as both science and history. Personality & Social Psychology Bulle­

tin. VoI2(4}. S. 421-427.

Good, D. (1993). The,problems of investigating social representations, linguistic parallels. 10 G. M. Break­

well & D. V. Canter. (Eds.). Empirical approaches to social representations. (S. 171-179). Oxford:

Clarendon Press.

Goodman, N. (1978). Ways of world making. New York: Hackett.

Gordon, C.& Gergen, K. J. (1968). The self in social interaction: 1. Classic & contemporary perspectives.

New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Gottlieb, C. B. (1996). Filicide: A strategic approach. Psychology: A Journal of Human Behavior. Vol 33(3}.

S.40--42.

Goubert-Seca, D. (1998). Representation sociale du groupe "cadres" chez des etudiants d'IUT: Approche

quasi-experimentale. Bulletin de Psychologie. VoI51(436}. S.441-448.

Graumann, C. F. (1985). The individualization of the social and the desocialization of the individual: Floyd

H. Allport's contribution to social psychology. In Graumann, C. F. & Moscovici, S. (Eds.). Changing

Conceptions of Crowd Mind and Behavior. Berlin: Springer.

Graumann, C. F. (1988a). Introduction to a history of social psychology. In M. Hewstone W. Stroebe & G.

M. Stepehnson (Eds.). Introduction to Social Psychology. (2.Auflage). Oxford UK, Cambridge MA:

Blackwell.

Graumanh, C. F. & Gergen, K. J. (Eds.).(1996). Historical dimensions of psychological discourse. New

York: Cambridge University Press.

Graumann, C. F. & Gergen, K. J. (Eds.) (1996). Historical Dimensions of Psychological Discourse. Cam­

bridge University Press

Greenberg, G. (1995). If a self is a narrative: Social constructionism in the clinic. Journal of Narrative and

Life History. VoI5(3}. S.269-283.

Greenwald, A. G. (1976). Transhistoricallawfulness of behavior: A comment on two papers. Personality &

Social Psychology Bulletin. Vol 2(4). S.391.

Greenwood, J. D. (1989). Explanation and Experiment in Social Psychological Science. Realism and the So­

cial constitution of action. New York: Springer.

Greenwood, J. D. (1992). Realism, empiricism and social constructionism: Psychological theory and the so­

cial dimensions of mind and action. Theory & Psychology. VoI2(2}. S. 131-151

Griffiths, P. E. (1997). What emotions really are: Theproblem of psychological categories. Chicago, IL: The

University of Chicago Press.

Literatur

Groeben, N. & Westmeyer, H. (1975). Kriterienpsychologischer Forschung. MUnchen: Juventa.

Gruvitch, G. (1971). The socialframeworks o/knowledge. New York: Harper & Row.

227

Guimelli, Ch & Jacobi, D. (1990). Pratiques nouvelles et transformation des representations sociales. Revue

Internationale de Psychologie Sociale. VoI3(3} S. 307-334.

Gutting, G. (1979). Continental philosophy of science. In P. Asquit (Ed.). Current research in philosophy 0/ science. AnnArbor: Edwards

Guyer, L. T. & Rowell, L. L. (1997). Gender, social constructionism, and psychotherapy: Deconstructing

feminist social constructions. In Th. L. Sexton & B. L. Griffin (Eds.). Constructivist thinking in coun­

seling practice, research, and training. Counseling and development series, No.3. (S. 58-73). New

York.

Hacking, I. (1999). Was heij3t ,soziale Konstruktion'? Zur Katifunktur einer Kampfvokabel in den Wissen­

schaften. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.

Handbook o/social psychOlogy (1" Ed.) (1954). ed. by G. Lidzey. Reading, MA, London: Addison - Wesley.

Handbook 0/ social psychology (2nd Ed.) (1969). ed. by G. Lindzey & E. Aronson. Reading, MA, London:

Addison - Wesley.

Handbook o/social psychology (3'" Ed.) (19~5). ed. by. G. Lindzey & E. Aronson London, Hillsdale, NJ.:

Lawrence Erlbaum

Handbook o/social psychology (4th Ed.) (1998). ed. by D.T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, G. Lindsey. Oxford, NY:

Oxford University Press.

Hare-Mustin, R. T. & Maracek, J. (1988). The Meaning of difference. Gender theory, postmodemism and

psychology. American Psychologist. Vol 43(6}. S. 455-464.

Harre, R. (1984). Some reflections on the concept of social representation. Social Research. Vol. 51(4}. S.

927-938.

Harre, R. (1992). What is real in psychology: A plea for persons. Theory & Psychology. Vol 2(2}. S. 153-

158.

Harre, R. (1995). The necessity of personhood as embodied being. Theory & Psychology. VoI5(3}. S. 369-

373.

Harre, R. (1998a). The epistemiology of social representation. In Flick, U. (Ed.): The psychology o/the so-

cial. (S. 129-137). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Harre, R. (1998b). The singular self An introduction to the psychology o/personhood. London: Sage.

Harre, R. & Secord, P. (1972). The explanation o/social behaviour. Oxford: Blackwell.

Harris, L. M., Gergen, K. J. & Lannamann, J. W. (1986). Agression rituals. Communication Monographs 53.

S.252-265.

Hegel, G. F. W. (1816). Die Wissenschaft der subjectiven Logik oder die Lehre yom Begriff. Hauptwerke in

sechs Banden. Band 4. Hamburg: Meiner 1999.

Hegel, G. F. W. (1821). Grundlinien der Philosophie des Rechts. Hauptwerke in sechs Banden. Band 5.

Hamburg: Meiner 1999.

Heider, F. (1944). Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological review 51, S. 358-374.

Heiligers, Ph. (1995). Sociale representatie van de dubbele identiteit. De Psycholoog Januari 1995. S. 12-19.

Heintz, B. (1993). Wissenschaft im Kontext. Neuere Entwicklungstendenzen der Wissenschaftssoziologie.

Kainer Zeitschrijl for Soziologie und Sozialpsychologie. Jg. 45, Heft 3. S. 528-552.

228 Literatur

Hendrick, C. (1974). Social psychology as history: A bibliography. Catalog of Selected Documents in Psy­

chology 4. S. 125-126.

Hendrick, C. (1976). Social psychology as history and as traditional science: An appraisal. Personality & So­

cial Psychology Bulletin. Vol 2(4). S.392.

Henwood, K. & Coughlan, G. (1993). The construction of "closeness" in mother-1lliughter relationships

across the lifespan. In N. Coupland & J. F. Nussbaum (Eds.). Discourse and lifespan identity. Lan­

guage and language behaviors. Vol 4. (S. 191-214). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

Hermans, H. J. M. (1995). The limitations of logic in defining the self. Theory & Psychology. Vol 5(3). S.

375-382.

Hermans, H. J. M.; Kempen, H. J. G., van Loon & Rens, J. P. (1992). The dialogical self. Beyond individual­

ism and rationalism. American Psychologist Vol 47(1). S. 23-33.

Herrmann, Th. (199\), Diesmal diskursiv - schon wieder eine Emeuerung der Psychologie. Report Psycho­

logie Februar 1991. S.21-27.

Herzlich, C. (1964). Quelques aspects de la representation sociale de la sante et de la maladie. Psychologie

Francaise. 9(1). S. 1-14.

Herzlich, C. (1968). The origin ofHlness: Analysis ofa social representation. Hygiene-Mentale. Vol 57(1): S.

1-24.

Herzlich, C. (1973). Health and Illness. A Social Psychological Analysis. London: Academic Press.

Historisches Worterbuch der Philosophie (1971-... ). hrsg.v. J.Ritter; R. Eisler et al. Darmstadt: Wissen-

schaftliche Buchgesellschaft.

Hollway, W. (1989). Subjectivity and method in psychology. London: Sage.

Holzkamp, K. (1972). Kritische Psychologie. Vorbereitende Arbeiten. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer.

Holzkamp, K. (1976). Kritische Psychologie. Hamburg: Fischer.

Holzkamp, K. (1980). Zu Wundts Kritik an der experimentellen Erforschung des Denkens. In W. Meischner

& A. Metge (Hrsg.). Wilhelm Wundt -progressives Erbe, Wissenschaftsentwickiung und Gegemvart.

Leipzig: Wissenschaftliche Berichte der Karl Marx-Universitiit. Sektion Psychologie.

Hovland, C:I.; Janis, I. L. & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and Persuasion. Yale University Press.

New Haven.

Huguet, P., Latane, B. & Bourgeois, M. (1998). The emergence ofa social representation of human rights via

interpersonal communication: Empirical evidence for the convergence of two theories. European

Journal of Social Psychology. Vo128. S. 831-846.

Ibanez, Th. (1991). Social psychology and the rhetoric of truth. Theory & Psychology. Vol 1(2). S. 187-201.

Ibanez, Th. (1994) Constructing a representation or representing a construction. Theory & Psychology. Vol

4(3). S. 363-381.

IrIe, M. (1969). Texte aus der experimentellen Sozialpsychologie. Neuwied und Darmstadt: Luchterhand.

Israel, J. & Tajfel, H. (Eds.) (1972). The context of social psychology. A critical assesment. London, New

York: Academic Press.

Jackson, J.M. (1988). Social Psychology, Past and Present. An integrative orientation. Hillsdale, New Jer­

sey: Lawrence Erlbaum Ass. Pub.

Jacob, S. (2000). Narratio - Die Rolle der Erztihlung in Ethikkonzeptionen der Gegemvart: Paul RiclEur und

Alasdair Maclntyre. Jena: Garamond.

Literatur 229

Jaensch, E. (J 929). Grundformen menschlichen Seins. Berlin: Otto Eisner.

Jahoda, G. (1974). The context of social psychology: A critical assessment, edited by Joachim Israel and

Henri Tajfel. European Journal of Social Psychology. VoI4(I). S. 105-112.

Jahoda, G. (1982). Psychology and anthropology: a psychological perspective. London: Academic Press.

Jahoda, G. (1988) Critical notes and reflections on ,social representations'. European Journal of Social Psy­

chology. Vol 18. S. 195~209.

James, W. (J907). Pragmatism. New York and London. (DT.: Der Pragmatismus: Ein neuer Namefilr alte

Denkmethoden. Hamburg: Meiner 1977).

James, W. (1951). Essays in Pragmatism. New York: Haffuer.

Jaspars, J. & Fraser, C. (1984). Attitudes and social representations. In R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.). Social

Representations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jodelet, F. (1975). The social representation of polIution of the environment. Bulletin de Psychologie. Vol

28(9-12). S. 617-{}38.

Jodolet, D. (1984). The representation of the body and its transformations. In R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.).

Social Representations. (S. 211-238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jones, E. R; Davis, K. E. & Gergen, K. J. (1961). Role playing variations and their informational value for

person perception. Journal of Abnormal & Social Psychology. Vol 63 (2). S.302-31O.

Jones, E. E. & Gerard, H. B. (1967). Foundations of social psychology. New York: Willey.

Jones, E. E. & Harris, V. A. (1967). The attribution of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology

3. S. 1-24.

Jones, E. E., Gergen, K. J. & Davis, K. R (J962). Some determinants of reactions to beeing approved or dis­

approves as a person. Psychological Monographs. 76(2) S. 17.

Jones, E. E.; Jones, R. G. & Gergen, K. J. (J 963). Some conditions affecting the evaluation of a conformist.

Journal of Personality. Vol 31(2). S.270-288.

Jones, E. J. (1998). Major Developments in Five Decades of Social Psychology. In Handbook of Social Psy­

chology. ed. by D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske & G. Lindzey (S. 3-50). New York: Oxford University

Press.

10vchelovitch, S. (1996). In defence of representations. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. Vol

26(2). S. 121-135.

10vchelovitch, S. (1998). Social representations and public life: The symbolic construction of public spaces.

Vortrag auf der Konferenz "Social Representations: Introductions ans Explorations". New York:

CUNY (unverllffentlichtes Manuskript).

Jlittemann, G. (1995). Wegbereiter der Psychologie. Weinheim: Psychologische Verlags Union.

Kafai, Y. B. & Resnick, M. (1996). Constructionism in practice: Designing, thinking, and learning in a digi­

tal world. Mahwah, NJ Lawrence Erlbaum

Katz, D. (1978). Social Psychology in relation to the social sciences: The second social psychology. Ameri-

can Behavioral Scientist 5. S. 779-792.

Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist. 28(2). S. 107-128.

Kelly, G. A. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs. New York: Norton.

Kelmann, H.C. (1972). The rights of subjects in social. Analysis in terms of relative power and legitimacy.

American Psychologist 27. S. 989-1016.

230 Literatur

Kempen, H J. G. (1996). Mind as body moving in space: Bringing the body back into self psychology. The-ory & Psychology. Vol 6(4). S. 715-731.

Kenwood, C. (1996). Does volition need social constructionism? Theory & Psychology. Vol 6(3) S. 533-538.

Knorr-Cetina, K. (1984). Die Fabrikation lion Erleenntnis. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Kogan, N. & Wallach, M (1967). Group Risk Taking As A Function Of Members' Anxiety And Defensive­

ness Levels. Journal o/Personality. Vol 35(1). S.S0-63.

Kllnig, R. (1978). Emile Durkheim zur Diskussion. Jenseits von Dogmatismus und Sleepsis. MUnchen. Wien. Carl Hanser Verlag.

Kraft, V. (1950). Der Wiener Kreis. Der Ursprung des Neopositivismus. (3. Auflage). Wien, New York: Springer.

Krech, D.; Crutchfield, R. S. & Ballachey, E. L. (1962). Individual in Society. A textbook 0/ social psychol­ogy. New Yark: McGraw-Hill Book Company.

Kriz, J. & LUck, H. E. & Heidenberink, H. (1987). Wissenschqfts- und Erleenntnistheorie. Eine Ei'!filhrung for Psychologen und Humanwissenschqftler. (2. Auflage). OpJaden: Leske und Budrich ..

Kruglanski, A. W. (2001). That "vision thing". The state of theory in social and personality psychology at the

edge of the new millenium. JourtUfl o/Personality and Social Psychology. VoI80(6). S. 871-875.

Kruse, L. & Schwarz, s. (1992). Who pays the bill? The language of social representation. In M. von Cra­

nach & W. Daise (Eds.). Social representations and the social bases of knowledge. (S. 23-29). lewis­ton, NY: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers. (Swiss monographs in psychology. Vol. I).

Kruse, L.; Weimer, E. & Wagner, F. (1988). What men and women are said to be: Social representation and language. Journal 0/ Language and Social Psychology. Vol 7(3-4). S. 243-262.

Kruse,L. & Morris, R. (1998). The social represenation of "man" in everyday speech. In: U. Flick (Ed.). The psychology o/the social. (S. 196-206). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Kuhn, Th. (1962). Die Struktur wissenschqftlicher Revolutionen. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1997 (14.Auflage).

Kukla, A. (1986). On social constructionism. American Psychologist. Vol 41(4). S.480-481.

Kvale, St. (Ed.) (1992). Psychology and postmodernism. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (Inquiries in social con­strbction).

Labov, W. (1982). Speed actions and reactions in personal narrative. In D. Tanner (Ed.). Analyzing dis­course. Text and talk. Washington D.C.: Gergetown University Press.

Lamiel\, J.T. (1992). Persons, selves, and Agency. In D. W. Robinson (Ed.). Social Discourse an Moral Judgment. (S. 29 - 41). London: Academic Press.

Lange, E. M. (1998). Ludwig Wittgenstein: Philosophische Untersuchungen: eine kommentierende Ei'!filh­rung. Paderbom et a1.: SchOningh. (UTB Wissenschaft 2055)

Lannamann, J. w. (1999). Social construction and materiality: The limits of indeterminacy in therapeutic set­

tings. Family Process. Vol 37(4). S. 393-413.

Latour, B. (1987). Science in Action. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.

Latour, B. & Woolgar, St. (1979). Laboratory Life: The Social Construction o/Scientific Facts. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Laucken, U. (1994). Individuum, Kultur, Gesellschaft: Eine Begriffsgeschichte der Sozialpsychologie. Bern et a1.: Huber.

Literatur 231

Laucken, U. (1998). Sozialpsychologie. Geschichte. Hauptstromungen. Tendenzen. Bibliotheks und Informa­

tionssystem der Universitllt Oldenburg.

Leary, D. (1990). Metaphors in the history of psychology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leggewie, H. (1991). Argumente fUr eine Erneuerung der Psychologie. Report Psychologie. Feb. 1991. S.

11-20.

Legowski, T. & Brownlee, K. ~2001). Working with metaphor in narrative therapy. Journal of Family Psy-

chotherapy. VolI2(l). S. 19-28.

Lenk, H. (1986). Zwischen Wissenschqftstheorie und SozialwissenschaJt. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Lenk, H. (1987). Zwischen S,?zialpsychologie und Sozialphilosophie. Frankfurt am Main. Suhrkamp.

Lenk, H. (1993). Interpretationskonstrukte: Zur Kritik der interpretatorischen Vernu'1ft. Frankfurt am Main:

Suhrkamp.

Lenk, H. (2000). Erfassung tier Wirklichkeit. eine interpretationsrealistische Erkenntnistheorie. Wllrzburg:

Konigshausen & Neumann.

Uvi-Srauss, C. (1958). Strukturale Anthropologie 1. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1967.

Uvi-Srauss, C. (1962). Das wilde Denken. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp: 1968.

Uvi-Srauss, C. (1973). Strukturale Anthropologie II. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1975.

Levy-Bruhl, L. (1927). Die Seele der Primitiven. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft 1959.

Levy-Bruhl, L. (1931). La mentalite primitive. Oxford: Claredon Press.

Lewin, K (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper.

Lewin, K. Lippit, R. & White, R. K. (1939). Patterns of aggressive behavior in experimentally created "social

climates." Journal of Social Psychology 10. S. 271-299.

Liebrucks, A. (2001). The concept of social construction. Theory & Psychology Voill (3). S. 263-391.

Lischke, G. (1993). Historische Psychologie - Ergl!nzung und Erweiterung oder radikale Alternative zur Psy­

chologie? In M. Sonntag & G. Jilttemann (Hrsg.). Individuum und Geschichte. Beitriige zur Diskussi­

on um "Historische Psychologie". Heidelberg: Asanger.

Lloyd, B. & Smith, C. (1985). The social representation of gender and young children's play. British Journal

of Developmental Psychology. Vol 3(1). S. 65-73.

Lorenzo--Cioldi, F. (1996). Psychological androgeny: A concept in search of lesser substance. Towards the

understanding of the transformation ofa social representation. Journalfor the Theory of Social Behav­

iour. VoI26(2). S. 137-155.

Lubek, I.; van Hezewijk, R.; Pheterson, G. & Tolman, C. W. (Eds.) (1995). Trends and issues in theoretical

psychology. New York: Springer.

Lilck, H. E.; GrUnewald, H.; Geuter, U.; Miller, R. & Rechtien, M. (1987). Sozialgeschichte der Psychologie.

Opladen: Leske und Budrich.

Luckmann, Th. (1990). Eine verfrilhte Beerdigung des Selbst. Psychologische Rundschau 41. S.203-205.

Lynch, G. (1997). Therapeutic theory and social context: A social constructionist perspective. British Journal

of Guidance and Counselling. Vol 25(l). S. 5-15.

Lynch, M. (1985). Art and artifact in laboratory science: A Study of shop work and shop talk in a research

laboratory. London: Routledge.

Lyons, W. (Ed.) (1995). Modern Philosophy of Mind. London: Orion Publishing Group.

232 Literatur

Macintyre, A. (1981). After virtue. A study in moral theory. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame

Press.

Madsen, K .B. (1985). Psychological metatheory. In K. B. Madsen & L. P. Mos (Eds.). Annals o/Theoretical

Psychology. Vol.3. New York: Plenum.

Madsen, K. B. (1987). Theoretical Psychology. A definition and systematic classification. In W. J. Baker, M.

E. Hyland, H. v. Rappard & A. W. Stats (Eds.). Current Issues in Theoretical Psychology. North Hol­

land: Elsevier.

Malone, K. R. (1998). Feminism and psychoanalysis consider sexuality and the symbolic order: Would social

construction join us? In B. Bayer & Shotter, J. (Eds.). Reconstructing the psychological subject: Bod­

ies, practices and technologies. London: Sage. (Inquiries in social construction).

Mancuso, J.C. (1996) Constructionism, personal construct psychology and narrative psychology. Theory &

Psychology. VoI6(l). S.47-70.

Mandler, J. M. (1984). Stories, scripts, and scenes. Aspects o/schema theory. Hillsdale, N.J., Erlbaum.

Mannetti, L. & Tanucci, G. (1993). The meaning of work for young people: The role of parents in the trans­

mission of a social representation. In G. M. Breakwell & D. V. Canter (Eds.). Empirical approaches

to social representations. (S. 298-314). New York: Oxford University Press.

Mannheim, K. (1931). Wissenssoziologie In ders. Ideologie und Utopie. (S. 22F267). Frankfurt am Main.

Klostermann 1969.

Markova, I. (1987). Knowledge of the self through interaction. In K. Yardley & T. Honess (Eds.). Self and

identity: Psychosocial perspectives. (S. 65-80). Chochester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.

Markova, I. (1992). Scientific and public knowledge of AIDS: The problem of their integration. In M. von

Cranach & W. Doise (Eds.). Social representations and the social bases a/knowledge. (S. 179-183).

Lewiston, NY: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers. (Swiss monographs in psychology. Vol. I).

Markova, 1. (2000). The individual and society in psychological theory. Theory & Psychology. VolfO(I). S.

107-116.

Markova, I. & Wilkie, P. (1987). Representation, concepts and social change: The phenomenon of AIDS.

Journal/or the Theory a/Social Behaviour. Vol 17(4). S. 389-409.

Martin, E .• M. (1987). The woman in the body: A cultural analysis a/reproduction. Boston: Beacon Press.

Martin, J. & Sugarman, J. (1996). Bridging social constructionism and cognitive constructivism: A psychol­

ogy of human possibility and constraint. Journal of Mind and Behavior. Vol 17(4). S. 291-319.

Martin, J. & Sugarman, J. (1997). The social-cognitive construction of psychotherapeutic change: Bridging

social constructionism and cognitive constructivism. Review of General Psychology. Vol 1(4). S.375-

388.

Martin, J. & Sugarman, J. (1999). The psychology of human possibility and constraint. Albany, NY: State

University of New York Press.

Martinez de Taboada, C.; Arrospide, J.J. & Verges, P. (1998). Representacion social de la economia en jove­

nes vascos. Boletin de SicologEa Espanola. Vol6I. S.47-64.

Matthews, W. J. (1998). Let's get real: The fallacy of post-modernism. Journal of Theoretical and Philoso­

phical Psychology. Vol 18(1). S. 16-32.

Literatur 233

McCarty, Th. (1986). Philosophie und Wissenssoziologie. Zur Aktualitat der Kritischen Theorie. In A. Hon­

neth & A. Wellmer (Hrsg.). Die Frankfurter Schule und die Folgen. (S. 13-127). Berlin, New York:

de Gruyter.

McCloskey, D. N. (1985). The rhetoric of economics. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

McDougall, W. (1920). The group mind. New York: G. Putman's Son.

McDowell, J. (1994). Mind and world. Cambridge, MA: Havard University Press.

McGarty, C. & Haslam, A. S. (Eds.) (1997). The massage of social psychology: perspectives on mind in so­

ciety. Cambridge MA: Blackwell.

McGuire, W. (1973). The yin and yan of progress in social psychology: seven koans. Journal of Personality

& Social Psychology 26. S. 446 - 456.

McKinlay, A. & Potter, J. (1987). Social Representations: A conceptual critique. Journalfor the Theory of

Social Behaviour. Vol 17 (4). S. 471-487.

McKinlay, A., Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. (1993). Discourse Analysis and Social Representations. In G.M.

Breakwell & D.V. Canter. (Eds.) Empirical approaches to social representations. (S. 134-156). New

York: Oxford University Press.

Mead, G. H. (1909). Social psychology as a counterpart of physiological psychology. Psychological Bulletin

6. S. 401-408.

Mead, G. H. (1934). Mind, self and society. Chicago: Chicago University Press.

Merton, R. K. (1949). Soziologische Theorie und Soziale Struktur. Berlin. New York: de Gruyter 1995.

Michael, M. (1989). Attribution and Ordinary Explanation: Cognitivist Predilections and Pragmatists Alter-

natives. New Ideas in Psychology. Vol 7(3). S. 231-243.

Michael, M. (1996). Constructing a constructive critique of social constructionism: Finding a narrative space

for the non-human. New Ideas in Psychology. Vol 14(3). S. 209-224.

Michael, M. (1997). Individualistic humans. Social constructionism, identity and change. Theory & Psychol­

ogy Vol 7(3). S. 311-336.

Middelton, D. & Edwards, D. (Eds.) (1990). Collective remembering. London: Sage. (Inquiries in socil con­

struction series).

Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 67. S. 371-

378.

Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority. New York: Harper & Row.

Mink, L. A. (1969). History and fiction as modes of comprehension. New Literary History 1. S. 556-569.

Moede, W. (1920). Experimentelle Sozialpsychologie. Leipzig: S. Herzel.

Moghaddam, F. M. (1998). Social Psychology. Exploring universals across cultures. New York: Freeman

and Company.

Molinari, L. & Emiliani, F. (1990). What is in an Image? The Structure of mother's images of the child and

their influence on conversational styles. In G. Duveen & B. Lloyd (Eds.). Social representations and

the development of knowledge. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Molinari, L. & Speltini, G. (1998). Breast feeding, practices and values: A study of social representation.

Swiss Journal of Psychology. Vol 57(4). S. 235-247.

Moliner, P. & Tafani, E. (1997). Attitudes and social representations: A theoretical and experimental ap­

proach. European Journal of Social Psychology. Vol 27(6). S. 687-702.

234 Literatur

Moliner, P. (1992). Structure de representation et structure de schemes. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychola­

gie Sociale 14. S.48-52.

Moliner, P. (I995). A tw<Hiimensional model of social representations. European Journal of Social Psy­

chology. VoI25(I). S.27--40.

Money, J. (l995). Gendermaps: Social constructionism, feminism, and sexosophical history. New York:

Continuum Publishing.

Moreno, J. L. (1948). Experimental sociometry and the experimental method in science. In W. Dennis (Ed.).

Current trends in social psychology. (S. 119--162). Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Morse, S. & Gergen, K. J. (1970). Social comparison, self-consistency, and the concept of self. Journal of

Personality & Social Psychology. Vol. 16(1). S. 148-156.

Moscovici, S. {I 952). Premiers resultats d'nne enquete concernant la psychoanalyse. Revue Francaise de

Psychoanalyse 16. S.386--415.

Moscovici, S. (1961). La psychoanalyse: Son image et son pUblic. Paris, France, U France Press.

Moscovici, S. (l963). Attitudes and Opinions. Annual review of Psychology. Vol 14. S. 231-260.

Moscovici, S. (l972a). Society an Social Psychology. In Israel, J & Tajfel, H. (Hrsg) The context of social

psychology. A critical assesment. (S. 17--68). London, New York: Academic Press.

Moscovici, S. (l972b). The psychosociology of language. Chicago, Ill., Markham.

Moscovici, S. (1979). A rejoinder. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology. Vol 18(2). S. 181.

Moscovici, S. (1981). On social representation. In J. P. Forgas (Ed.). Social Cognition: Perspectives on eve-

ryday understanding. (S. 181-209). London: Academic Press. (European Monographs in Social Psy­

chology 26).

Moscovici, S. (1 984a). The phenomenon of social representation In R. Farr & S. Moscovici (Eds.) Social

Representations. (S. 3--69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Moscovici, S. (1984b). The Myth of the Lonly Paradigm: A Rejoinder. Social research. Vol 51(4). S. 939-

967.

Moscovici, S. (1986). The discovery of the masses. In Graumann, C. F. & Moscovici, S. (Eds.). Changing

Conceptions of Crowd Mind and Behavior. (S. 5-25). Berlin: Springer.

Moscovid, S. (1987). Answers and questions. Journalfor the Theory of Social Behaviour. Vol 17(4). S. 513-

529.

Moscovici, S. (1988). Notes towards a description of social representations. European Journal of Social Psy­

chology. Vol 18(3). S. 211-250.

Moscovici, S. (1989). Preconditions for explanation in social psychology. European Journal of Social Psy­

chology. Vol 19(5). S. 407--430.

Moscovici, S. (1990). The origin of social representations: A response to Michael. New Ideas in Psychology.

Vol 8(3). S. 383-388.

Moscovici, S. (l991a). Experiment and experience: An intermediate step from Sherif to Asch. Journalfor the

Theory of Social Behaviour. VoI21(3). S. 253-268.

Moscovici, S. (199Ib). Reflections and reactions to the credo of a true believer. New Ideas in Psychology.

Vol 9(2). S. 215-225.

Literatur 235

Moscovici, S. (1992). The psychology of scientific myths. In M. von Cranach & W. Doise (Eds.). Social rep­

resentations and the social bases of knowledge. (S. 3-9). Lewiston, NY: Hogrefe & Huber Publishers.

(Swiss monographs in psychology. Vol. I).

Moscovici, S. (1993). Toward a social psychology of science. Journalfor the Theory of Social-Behaviour.

Vol 23(4}. S. 343-374.

Moscovici, S. (1994). Social representation and pragmatic communication. Social Science Information. Vol

30(2}. S. 163-177.

Moscovici, S. (1998a). Why a Theory of Social Psychology. Vortrag aufder Konferenz Social Representati­

ons: Introductions an Explorations. New York: CUNY (unverMfentlichtes Manuskript).

Moscovici, S. (l998b). Social consciousness and its history. Culture and Psychology. VoI4(3}. S.411-429.

Moscovici, S. (l998c). The history and actuality of social represenations. In U. Flick (Ed.). The psychology

of the social. (S. 209-247). New Ybrk: Cambridge University Press.

Moscovici, S. & Hewstone, M. (1983). Social Representations and social explanations: From the ,naive' to

the ,amateur' scientist. In Hewstone, M. (Ed.). Attribution theory. Social and fimctional extensions.

Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

Mugny, G. & Carugati, F. (1989). Social representations of intelligence. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge Uni­

versity Press. (European monographs in social psychology).

MUller, H. P. (1999). Emile Durkheim (1858 - 1917). In D. Kaesler (Hrsg.). Klassiker der Soziologie 1. Von

Auguste Comte bis Norbert Elias. (S. 15~170). MUnchen: Beck.

Nelson, J. S., Megil, A. & McCloskey, D. (1987). The rhetoric of the human sciences. Madison: University

of Wisconsin Press.

Newcomb, Th. M. (1959). Sozialpsychologie. Maisenheim am Glan: Verlag Anton Hain KG.

Oatley, K. (1993). Social construction in emotions. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland (Eds.). Handbook of emo­

tions. (S. 341-352). New York: Guilford Press.

Oelze, B. (1991). Wilhelm Wundt. Die Konzeption der ViJlkerpsychologie. MUnster, New York: Waxmann.

Ongari, B.; Schadee, H. M. A. & Molina, P. (1999). Un'analisi strutturale della rappresentazione sociale della

profes~ione di educatrlce di nido. Eta evolutiva. No 63. S. 73-80.

Osbeck, L. M. (1993). Social constructionism and the pragmatic standard. Theory & Psychology. Vol 3(3}. S.

337-349.

Oysermann, D. & Markus, H. R. (1998). Self as social representation. In U. Flick (Ed.). The psychology of

the social. (S. 107-125). New York: Cambride University Press.

Parker, I. (1987). Social representations': Social psychology's (mis) use of sociology. Journal for the Theory

of Social Behaviour. Vol 17 (4). S. 447-469.

Parker, I. (1989). The crisis in modern social psychology and how to end it. London: Routledge.

Parker, I. (1990). Discourse:definitions and contradictions. Philosophical Psychology. VoI3(2}. S.189-204.

Parker, I. (1998). Social constructionism: Discourse and realism. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publica-

tions.

Parrott, W. G. (1992). Rhetoric for realism in psychology. Theory & Psychology. VoI2(2}. S. 159-165.

Parsons, T. (1964). Beitriige zur Soziologischen Theorie. (3. Auflage). Darmstadt & Neuwied am Rhein. Lu­

chterhand.

236 Literatur

Peeters, H. F. M. (1990). Limits of social constructionism: Beyond objectivism and relativism. In: F. J. R.

van de Vijver & G. J. M. Hutschemaekers (Eds.). The investigation of culture: Current issues in cul­

tural psychology. (S. 77-90). Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Pereira de Sa, C.; de Oliveira Souto, S. & Moeller, R.C. (J 996). La representation sociale de la science par

des consommateurs et par des non-<:onsommateurs de la vulgarisation scientifique. Cahiers Interna­

tionaux de Psychologie Sociale 29. S. 29-38.

Philogene, G. (1994). "African American" as a new social representation. Journalfor the Theory of Social

Behaviour. Vol 24(2}. S. 89-109.

Philogene, G. (1999). From Black to African American: A new social representation. Westport, CT,: Praeger

Publishers.

Piaget, J. (1954). The construction of reality in the child. New York. Basic Books.

Pickering, A. (1992). From Science as Knoweledge to Science as Practice. In Ders. (Ed.). Science as Practice

and Culture. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Platon (o.J.): Theiitet. ilbersetzt und erlliutert von O. Apelt. Leipzig: Felix Meiner. 1923. Unverlinderter

Nachdruck 1998.

Popper, K. (J 935). Logik der Forschung. Tilbingen: Mohr 1989.

Popper, K. (1972). Objektive Erkenntnis. Ein evolutioniirer Entwuif. Hamburg: Hoffmann und Campe. 1993.

Potter, J. (1992). Constructing Realism. seven Moves (plus or Minus a couple). Theory & Psychology. Vol

2(2}. S. 167-173.

Potter, J. (1996). Attitudes, Social Representations and Discursive Psychology. In M. Wetherell (Ed.) Iden­

tity groups and social Issues. London: Sage.

Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. (J 987). Discourse and Social Psychology. Beyond Attitudes and Behaviour. Lon­

don: Sage

Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. (1992). Mapping the Language of Racism. New York: Columbia University Press.

Potter, J. & Wetherell, M. (1995). Soziale Reprlisentationen, Diskursanalyse und Rassismus. In U. Flick

(Ed.). Psychologie des Sozialen. Repriisentationen in Wissen und Sprache. Reinbeck bei Hamburg:

Rowohlt.

Potter, J.;·Wetherell, M.; Gill, R & Edwards, D. (1990). Discourse: Noun, Verb or Social Practice? Philoso-

phical Psychology VoI3(3}. S. 205-217.

Propp, V. (\968). Morphology ofthefolktale. Austin. University of Texas Press.

Putnam, H. (J 997). Fur eine Erneuerung der Philosophie. Stuttgart: Reclam.

Radley, A. (1988). The social form of feeling. British Journal of Social Psychology. Vol 27. S. 5-18.

Rateau, P. (1999). Les etTets d'un conflit d'identification ideologique sur la structure d'une representation so­

ciale. Cahiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale No 42. S. 90--101.

Richardson, F. C.; Fowers, B. J. & Guignon, C. B. (1999). Re- envisioning psychology: Moral dimensions of

theory and practice. San Francisco,CA: Jossey-Bass.

Richardson, M. S. (1993). Work in people's lives: A location for counseling psychologists. Journal ofCoun­

seling Psychology. VoI40(4} S. 425-433.

Rickert, H. (1926). Kulturwissenschaft & Naturwissenschaft. Stuttgart. Reclam. 1986.

RicOlur, P. (1996). Das Selbst als ein Anderer. MUnchen: Fink.

Literatur 237

Riker, J. H. (1991). Human excellence and an ecological conception of the psyche. Albany, NY: State Uni­

versity of New York Press.

Rinunon-Kenan, S. (1983). Narrativefiction: Contemporary poetics. London: Methuen.

Ring, K. (1967). Experimental social psychology: Some sober questions about some frivolous values. Jour­

nal of experimental Social Psychology 4, S. 113-123.

Rippe, K. P. (1993). Ethischer Relativismus. Seine Grenzen. Seine Geltung. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schon­

ingh.

Roiser, M. (1987). Commonsense, science and public opinion. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour.

Vol 17(4). S. 411-432.

Rommetveit, R. (1984). The role of language and the transmission of social representations. In R. Farr & S.

Moscovici (Eds.). Social Representations. (S. 331 - 359). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Rook, M.; Irle, M. & Frey, D. (1993). Wissenschaftstheoretische Grundlagen sozialpsychologischer Theo-

rien. In D. Frey (Hrsg.). Theorien der Sozialpsychologie. Band I. Bern: Huber.

Rorty, R. (1989). Contingency, irony, and solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rorty, R. (1991). Objectivity, relativism, and truth. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Rosenthal,R. (1966). Experimenter effects iii behavioral science. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Rouse, J. (1987). Knowledge and Power. Towards a political philosophy of science. Ithaca: Cornell Universi-

ty Press.

Roussiau, N. & Soubiale, N. (1996). Etude de la transformation de la representation sociale I'Europe sous

impact majoritaire et minoritaire. Anuario de Psicologia. Vol 70(3). S. 19-43.

Samelson, F. (1974). History, origin myth and ideology: "Discovery" of social psychology. Journal for the

Theory of Social Behavior 4. S. 217 - 231.

Sampson, E. E. (1996). Establishing embodiment in psychology. Theory & Psychology. Vol 6(4). S. 601-

624.

Sampson, E. E. (1998). Life as an Embodied Art: The Second Stage - Beyond Constructionism. In B. Bayer

& J. Shotler (Eds.). Reconstructing the psychological subject. London: Sage. (Inquiries in Social Con­

struct!onism).

Sauvayre, P. (1995). On the dialectics of agency. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology. Vol

15(2). S. 144-160.

Schapp, W. (1953). In Geschichten verstrickt: Zum Sein von Mensch und Ding. Frankfurt am Main: Kloster­

mann 1985.

Scherer, K.R. (1993). Two faces of social psychology: European and North American Perspectives. Social

Science Iriformation. 32(4). S. 515-552.

Schiwy, G. (1970). Der franzosische Strukturalismus. Mode. Methode. Ideologie. Reinbek bei Hamburg:

Rowohlt.

Schiwy, G. (1973). Neue Aspekte des Strukturalismus. MUnchen: TB--Verlag.

Schmidt, S. J. (Hrsg.) (1987). Der Diskurs des Radikalen Konstruktivismus. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Scholes, R. & Kellog, R. (1966). The nature of narratives. New York: Oxford University Press.

SchUtz, A. (1932). Der sinnhafte Aujbau der sozialen Welt. Eine Einleitung in die verstehende Soziologie.

Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1991.

238 Literatur

Schiltz, A. & Ludemann, Th. (1979). Strukturen der Lebenswelt. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1994.

Schwandt, Th. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y.

S. Lincoln (Eds.). Handbook of qualitative research. (S. 118-137). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Secord, P. F. (1986). Social Psychology as a science. In J. Margolis & P. F. Secord (Eds.). Psychology: de­

signing the disciplin. New York: Blackwell Pub.

Seroin, G. R. (1989). On genetic social psychology. A rejoinder to Doise. European Journal of Social Psy­

chology Vol (I9). S.401-405.

Shaw, M. E. (1974). New science or non-science? Contemporary Psychology 19. S. 96-97.

Shawver, L. (200 I). If Wittgenstein and Lyotard could talk with Jack and Jill: Towards postmodem family

therapy. Journal' of Family Therapy. Vol 23(3}. S.232-252.

Sherif, M. (1936). The Psychology of Social Norms. Harper & Row. New York.

Shotter, J. (1992). Social constructionism and realism: Adequacy or accuracy? Theory & Psychology. Vol

2(2}. S. 175-182.

Shotter, J. (1993). Cultural politics of everyday life: Social constructionism, rhetoric and knawing of the

third kind. Buffalo, NY: University of Toronto Press.

Shotter, J. (1995). A "show" of agency is enough. Theory & Psychology. VoI5(3}. S.383-390.

Shotter, J. (1997). The Social Construction of our "inner lives".

hUp:/lwww.massey.ac.nzi-Alock/virtualJinner.htm

Silvana de Rosa, A. (1990). Comparaison critique entre les representations sociales et la cognition sociale:

sur la signification d'une approche developpementale dans l'etude des representations sociales. Ca­

hiers Internationaux de Psychologie Sociale 5. S. 69-109.

Simmel, G. (1900). Die Philosophie des Geldes. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp 1994.

Simons, G. (1999). Restorying the organization: Using team inquiry to co--construct a1temative approaches to

leadership within a division of a multinational manufacturing corporation. Dissertation Abstracts In­

ternational: Section B: The Sciences& Engineering. Vol 60(1 - B}. S. 400 US: Univ. Microfilms In­

ternational.

Simons, H. W. (Ed.) (1989). Rhetoric in the human sciences. London: Sage.

Simons, H. W. (1990). The rhetorical turn. Chicgo: University of Chicago Press.

Smedslund, J. (1998). Social representations and psychologic. Culture and Psychology. VoI4(4}. S. 435-454.

Smith, E. R. & Mackie, D. M. (1997). Integrating the Psychological and the Social to understand Human Be-

havior. In C. McGarty & A. S. Haslam (Eds.) (1997). The massage of social psychology: perspectives

on mind in society. Cambridge, UK: Blackwell.

Smith, E. R. & Mackie, D. M. (2000). Social psychology (2nd Ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology

Press/Taylor & Francis.

Soubiale, N. & Roussiau, N. (1998). Social representation ofisiam and changes in the stereotype of Muslims.

Psicologia: Teoria e Pesquisa. Vol 14(3). S. 191-202.

Spears, R. (1997). Introduction In: T. Ibanez & L. Iniguez (Eds.). Critical Social Psychology. London: Sage.

Squire, C. (1989). Significant differences: Feminism in psychology. London: Routledge.

Stacy, K. & Hills, D. (2001). More than protest: Further explorations of alternative metaphors in narrative

therapy. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Family Therapy. VoI22(3}. S. 120-128.

Literatur 239

starn, H. J. (l998). Personal construct theory and social constructionism: Difference and Dialogue. Journal

of Constructivist Psychology. Vol II (3). S. 187 - 203.

Starn, H. J. (2001). Introduction: Social constructionism and its critics. Theory & Psychology Vol 1l(3). S.

291-296.

Starn, H .J.; Rogers, T. B. & Gergen, K. J (Eds.) (1987). The analysis of psychological theory: Metapsy-

chological perspectives. Washington, DC: Hemisphere.

Steier, F. (Ed.) (l991). Research and reflexivity. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. (Inquiries in social construction).

Stephan, C. W. & Stephan, W. G. (l990). Two social psychologies. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. (2. Auflage).

Stogdil, R. M. (l948). Pe~onal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. Journal of Ap-

plied Psychology 25. S.35-71.

Stoner, G. & Green, S. K. (I992). Reconsidering the scientist-practitioner model for school psychology prac­

tice. School Psychology Review. Vol 21(1). S. 155-166.

Stouffher, S. A.; Suchman, E. A., De Vinney, L. C., Star, S. A. & WilIiams, R. M. (Eds.) (l949). The Ameri­

can Soldier:adjustment during army life. Studies in Social Psyhology in Worl War II. Vol I. Princeton,

NJ: Princeton University Press.

Stouffher, S. A.; Lumsdaine, A. A.; Lumsdaine, M. H.; WilIiams, R. M.; Smith, M. B., Janis, I. L.; Star, S. A.

& CortrelI, I. S. (Eds.) (l949). The American Soldier: combat and ist aftermath. Studies in Social

Psyhology in Worl War II. Vol 2. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Stouffher, S. A.; Guttman, L.; Suchman, E. A., Lazersfeld, P. F., Star, S. A. & Clausen, J. A. (Eds.) (1950).

Measurement and Prediction. Studies in Social Psyhology in Worl War II. Vol 4. Princeton, NJ:

Princeton University Press.

Strasser, P. (l999). Wirklichkeitkonstruktion und RationaliUtt. Ein Versuch uber den Relativismus. MUnchen:

Alber.

Straub, J. (1998}.Geschichten erzlihlen. Geschichte bilden. Grundzlige einer narrativen Psychologie histori­

scher Sinnbildung. In ders. (Hrsg.). Erinnerung, Geschichte, Identitat. 1. Erzahlung Identitiit und his­

torisches Bewuj3tsein. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Straub, J. (1999). Handlung, Interpretation, Kritik. Grundziige einer textwissenschaftlichen Handlungs und

Kulturpsychologie. Berlin: de Gruyter.

Straub, J. (2001). Psychologie und Kultur. Psychologie als Kulturwissenschaft. In H. Appelsmeyer & E.

Billmann-Mahecha (Hrsg.). Kulturwissenschqft. Felder einer prozessorientierten wissenschqftlichen

Praxis. Weilerwist: VeribrUck Wissenschaft.

Stroebe, W. & Kruglanski, A. W. (1989). Social psychology at epistemological cross-roads: On Gergen's

choice. European Journal of Social Psychology. Vol 19(5). S.485-489.

Strykers, S. (l997). "in the Beginning there is society": Lessons from a Sociological Social Psychology. In

C. McGarty & A. S. Haslam (Eds.) (1997). The massage of social psychology: perspectives on mind in society. Cambridge, UK: BlackwelI.

Sutton-Smith, B. (1979). Presentation and representation in fictional narrative. New Directions for Child De­

velopment 6. S. 37-ii0.

Tajfel, H. & Moscovici, S. (1976). The rebirth of old myths in social psychology: A curious "Irrlebnis." Zeit­

schriftfur Sozialpsychologie. Vol 7(3). S. 292-297.

240 Literatur

Tajfel, H.; Jaspars, J. & Fraser, C. (1984). The social dimension. European developments in social psychol­

ogy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tarde, G. (1898). Etudes de psychologie sociale. Paris. Giard et Briere.

Tavris, C. (1999). The science an politics of gender research: The meaning of difference. In D. Bernstein et

al. (Eds.). Gender and motivation. Nebraska symposium on motivation. Vol. 45. (S. 1-23). Lincoln,

NE: University of Nebraska Press.

Taylor, D. M. & Brown, R. J. (1979). Towards a more social social psychology? British Journal of Social

and Clinical Psychology. VoII8(2} S. 173-180.

Tepe, P. (1992). Postmoderne Poststrukturalismus. Wien: Passagen.

Terwee, S.J.S. (1995). Deconstruction Social Constructionism. In I. Lubek; R. van Herzewijk, G. Pheterson

& Ch.W. Tolman (Eds.). Trends and Issues in Theoretical Psychology. (S. 188-194). New York:

Springer.

Thomas, A. (1991). GtundrifJ der Sozialpsychologie. Band I. Grundlegende Begriffe und Prozesse. Gilttingen

et al: Hogrefe.

Thomas, W. I. & Znaniecki, F. (1918 - 20). The Polish Peasant in Europe and America. 5 Bnd. Boston:

Badger.

Thomgate, W. (1976). "In general" vs. "it depends": Some comments on the Gergen-Schlenker debate. Per­

sonality & Social Psychology Bulletin. Vo12(4). S.404-41O.

Thrush, D.; Fife-Schaw, Ch. & Breakwell, G. M. (1997). Young people's representations of others' views of

smoking: is there a link with smoking behaviour? Journal of Adolescence. VoI20(I}. S. 57-70.

Treppenhauer, A.(1976). Emanzipatorische Psychologie. Probleme einer Wissenschaft vom Subjekt. Frank­

furt am Main. New York: Campus Verlag. Paperbacks Kritische Sozialwissenschaft.

Triplett, N. (1897). The dynamogenic fuctors in peacemaking and competiton. American Journal of Psychol­

ogy 9. S. 507 - 533.

Turner, St. (1998). The Limits of Social Constructionism. In I. Veldody & R. Williams (Eds.). The Politics of

Constructionism. (S. 109-120). London: Sage.

Tvaris, C. (1981). Anger: The misunderstood emotion. New York: Simon & Schuster.

Tyler, T. R., Kramer, R. M. & John, O. P. (Eds.) (1999). The psychology of the social self. Mahwah, NJ:

Lawrence Erlbaum.

Unger, R. K. (1983). Through the looking glass: No wonderland yet! (The reciprocal relationshio between

methodology and models of reality). Psychology of Woman Querterly 8. S. 19-32.

van de Vijver, F. J. R. & Hutschemaekers, G. J. M. (Eds.) (1990). The investigation of culture: Current is­

sues in cultural psychology. Tilburg, Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

van Dijk, T.A. (1983). Discourse analysis: Its development and application to the structure of news. Journal

of Communication. Vol 33(2}. S. 20-43.

van Dijk, T. (1998). Ideology. A multidiziplinary approach. London, England, UK: Sage Pub.

van Reijen, W. (1986). Philosophie als Kritik. Einfohrung in die Kritische Theorie. KilnigsteinlTaununs:

Athenaum.

von Cranach, M. (1992). The multi-level organisation of knowledge and action. An integration of complex­

ity. In ders. et al (Eds.). Social representations and the social bases of knowledge. Lewiston, NY:

Hogrefe and Huber Publishers. (Swiss monographs in psychology, Vol. I).

Literatur 241

von Cranach, M. (1998). The knowledge of social systems. In Flick, U. (Ed.): The psychology of the social.

New York: Cambridge University Press.

von Cranach, M.; Doise, W. & Mugny, G. (Eds.) (1992). Social representations and the social bases of

knowledge. Lewiston, NY: Hogrefe and Huber Publishers. (Swiss monographs in psychology, Vol. I).

von Glasersfeld, E. (1997). Radikaler Konstruktivismus: Ideen, Ergebnisse, Probleme. Frankfurt am Main:

Suhrkamp.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1934). Denken undSprechen. Berlin: Akademie Verlag 1964.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge:

Havard University Press.

Wagner, W. (I 994a). AI/tag~diskurs. Die Theorie sozialer Reprasentationen. G5ttingen et al.: Hogrefe.

Wagner, W. (1994b). The fallacy of misplaced intentionality in social representation research. Journal for the

Theory of Social Behaviour. VoI24(3). S.243-265.

Wagner, W. (1995). Social representations, group affiliation and projection: knowing the limits of validity.

European Journal of Social Psychology. Vol. 25. S. 125-139.

Wagner, W. (1996a). Queries about social representation and construction. Journalfor the Theory of Social

Behaviour. Vol 26(2). S. 95-120.

Wagner, W. (1996b). The social representation paradigm. Japanese Journal of Experimental Social Psychol­

ogy. Vol 35(3). S. 247-255.

Wagner, W. (1998). Social representations an beyond: Brute facts, symbolic coping and domestic worlds.

Culture and PSYchology. Vol 4(3). S. 297 - 329.

Wagner, W.; Duveen, G.; Farr, R.; Jovchelovitch, S.; Lorenzi-Cioldi, F.; Markova, I. & Rose, D. (1999).

Theory and method of social representations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology. Vol 2(1). S. 95-

125.

Wagner, W.; Elejabarrieta, F. & Lahnsteiner, J. (1995). How the sperm dominates the ovum: Objectification

by metaphor in the social representation of conception. European-Journal of Social Psychology. Vol

25(6). S.671-688.

Wagner, W.; Valencia, J. & Elejabarrieta, F. (1996). Relevance, discourse and the "hot" stable core of social

representations: A structural analysis of word associations. British Journal of Social Psychology. Vol 35(3). S.331-351.

Wallach, M. A. & Kogan, N. (1965). The roles of information, discussion, and consensus in group risk tak­

ing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Vol 1(1). S. 1-19.

Wallach, M. A.; Kogan, N. & Burt, R. B. (1965). Can group members recognize the effects of group discus­

sion upon risk taking? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Vol I (4). S. 379-395.

Walters, D. (2000). The social construction of mother daughter relationships. Dissertation Abstracts Interna­

tional: Section B: The Sciences & Engineering. Vol 60(7 - B). S. 3583. US: Univ. Microfilms Interna­

tional.

Weber, M. (1968). Die Protestantische Ethik. GUtersloh: GUtersloher Verlagshaus Mohn 1995.

Wells, A. (1987) Social Representations and the World of Science. Journal for the Theory of Social Behav­

iour. 17 (4). S.433-445.

Wendel, H. J. (1990). Moderner Relativismus. Zur Kritik antirealistischer Sichtweisen des Erkenntnisprob­

lems. TUbingen: Mohr.

242 Literatur

Westennann, R. (2000). Wissenschaftstheorie und Experimentalmethodik: Ein Lehrbuch zur psychologischen

Methodenlehre. Gijttingen: Hogrefe.

Wetherell, M. (1998) Defining social psychology. In R. Sapsford, A. Still; M. Wetherell; D. Miell & R. Ste­

vens (Eds.). Theory and Social Psychology. (S. 5-18). London: Sage.

Wexler, P. (1983). Critical social psychology. Boston: Routledge Kegan Paul.

Winch, P. (1974). Die Idee der Sozialwissenschaften und ihr VerMltnis zur Philosophie. Frankfurt am Main:

Suhrkamp.

Windelband, W. (1878). Die Geschichte der neueren Philosophie in ihrem Zusammenhang mit der allgemei­

nen Cultur und den besonderen Wissenschaften. Leipzig: Breitkopf & H1Irtei.

Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus logica-philosophicus. Werkausgabe Band I. Frankfurt am Main: Suhr­

kamp 1984.

Wittgenstein, L. (1953). Philosophische Untersuchungen. Werkausgabe Band I. Frankfurt am Main:

Suhrkamp 1984.

Wong, K. N. (1999). The residual problem of the self: A re-evaluation ofVygotsky and social construction­

ism. New Ideas in Psychology. Vol 17(1}. S.71-82.

Woolgar, S. & Pawluck, D. (1985). Ontological gerrymandering: The anatomy of social problems explana­

tions. Social Problems 32. S. 218.

Wortham, S. (1996). Constructionism, personal construct psychology and narrative psychology: Are con­

structs personal?: Comment. Theory & Psychology. VoI6(1} S. 79-84.

Wundt, W. (1900 - 1920). Volkerpsychologie. Entwicklungsgesetze von Sprache Mythos und Sille. 10 Bde.

Leipzig. Engelmann und Krijner.

Wundt, W. (1912). Elemente der Volkerpsychologie. Grundlinien einer psychologischen Entwicklungsge­

schichte der Menschheit. Leipzig: Krijner.

Zajonc, R. B. (1966). Social Psychology: An Experimental Approach. Wadsworth, Belmont. Califomia.

Zuckennan, M. & Norton, J. (1961). Response set and content factors in the California F Scale and the Pa­

rental Attitude Research Instrument. Journal of Social Psychology 53. S. 199-210.

Zuriff, G. (1998). Against metaphysical social constructionsm in psychology. Behavior and Philosophy. Vol

26/1-2}. S. 5-28.