list_new2.asp(2)

EX.No:68/14 GeetaVsJoginderKumar

PS:Bindapur15.05.2015.

Present: DH in person along with Proxy Counsel Sh. Ashok

KumarTanwar.

JDisabsent.

BailablewarrantsissuedagainsttheJDreceivedback

unexecuted.Reportperused.

It appears that the presence of the JD cannot be

securedwithouttakingfurthercoercivestepsagainstJD.

Hence,NBW'sbeissuedagainsttheJDthroughSHO

concerned,returnablefor07.07.2015.

(ManuGoelKharb)MM,(MahilaCourt)03DwarkaCourts,ND.15.05.2015.

Ex.No:29/14 MamtaGuptaVsAshokKhandelwal


Present: DHinperson.

JDinperson.

JDhashandedoverasumofRs. 15,000/totheDH

againstreceipt.

Listforfurtherpaymenton01.07.2015at2:00P.M.


CCNo:7/2/15 LataVs.AmerishSinghaletc.

PS:Bindapur15.05.2015.Present: ComplainantinpersonalongwithLdcounselSh.K.R.

Kaushik.Respondentsno.1,3and4areabsent.Sh.VikasBhatia,Ld.Counselforrespondents.

Todayagainrespondentshavenotappearedbeforethe

court.ItisorallysubmittedbytheLd.Counselfortherespondents

that respondent no. 1 has met with an accident. Hence,

respondentswillnotappearinpersonbeforethecourttoday.

Intheinterestofjustice,exemptionofrespondentsno.

1,3and4isallowedfortodayonly&theyaredirectedtopositively

appearbeforethecourtonNDOH.

Ld. Counsel for the respondents has filed an

applicationfordischargerespondentno.4.Copysupplied.

Ld.counselfortherespondentshasalsosuppliedthe

advancecopyof theWStothecounselforthecomplainantand

submitsthatheshallplaceonrecordtheWSonNDOH.

Atthisstage, it is submittedbyboththepartiesthat

theyarereadytosettlethepresentcase.

Courtalsoseesanelementofsettlementinthepresent

case.Assuchthepresentmatteris referredtoMediationCentre.

Parties are directed to appear before the Mediation Centre,

DwarkaCourt,NewDelhi on05.06.2015at 11.00am &report

beforethiscourton21.07.2015.

Ahlmad is directed to sent the file complete in all

respectswellbeforedate&timefixed.


FIRNo.330/02StateVsRoshanLalPSNajafgarh

15.05.2015.PW3/SIRajinderKaur,No.2131/D,CAWCell,NewDelhi(recalled

forcrossexaminationafter19.03.2015).

OnSA

XXXXXXXXbySh.HaneefMohammad,Ld.Counsel foraccused

person.

Iwashavingthefileforinvestigationfrom19.08.2002

to27.09.2002andthesamewasgivenbytheReader.Ihadsentthe

requestnoticetoSitaRani.IdonotremembertoallwhomIhave

senttherequestnotice.ItmightbepossiblethatIhavetoldSita

RanitobringPremKumaralongwithher.SitaRaniappearedon

thedatementionedinthenotice.Ihaverecordedthestatementof

theSitaRanionhersecondvisit.Idonotrememberthedateasto

whenIhaverecordedthestatementofSitaRaniandalsowhenshe

firstvisited.OnlythestatementofSitaRaniwasrecordedonher

secondvisit.HoweverIdidnotrecordthestatementofanyperson

onthefirstvisitofSitaRani.Idonotrememberthetimewhenthe

SitaRanivisitedtheCAWCell.IevencannottellastowhetherSita

Raniprelunchorpostlunchperiodasitisthirteenyearsoldcase.

I do not remember as to whether Sita Rani came alone or

accompaniedbysomeone.Ihadmyself writtenthestatementof

SitaRani.IcannottellastohowmuchdurationSitaRanistayed.I

never visited the house of the complainant or the accused

personally.IdonotrememberastowhetherIhaveaskedthemto

bringtheoriginalbillofstridhanbills.AgainsaidImusthaveasked

themtobringtheoriginalstridhanbills.Duringmyinvestigation

period original bills were never handed over to me. I have not

mentionedthelistofarticlesintheseizurememowhichisalready

Ex.PW3/A.Ihadnotverifiedthebillsfromtheaccusedaswellas

respective shops mentioned in the seizure memo as the

investigationistransferredfrommeandIhavehandedoverthefile

to theReader of Inspector CAWCell. Thecopyof the bills were

handedovertomebyPremKumar.IcannottellastowhenPrem

KumarcametomeafterthevisitofSitaRani.Ihavenotmadeany

DDentryastovisitofPremKumarorastohandingoverofthebills

as I havementioned the same in case diary. Marriage card and

marriagephotographswerealsohandedoverbyPremKumar.Ido

notrememberwhetheronthatdayPremKumarhadcometoCAW

Cellaloneoraccompaniedbysomeoneelse.IhadnotmadeSita

RanitosignSection161CrPCstatement.Ihavenotreceivedthe

complaint of the complainant on the basis of which FIR was

registeredasthefilecametomeafterinitialinvestigation.Ihave

not done any proceedings relating to the accused persons. It is

wrongtosuggestthatIhaverecordedthestatementofSitaRanion

myown. It is further wrong to suggest that Sita Rani andPrem

Kumardidnotmeetmeatanypointoftime.Itisfurtherwrongto

suggestthatIhavemanipulatedandfabricatedthethings/case.It

isfurtherwrongtosuggestthatIamdeposingfalsely.

RO&AC (ManuGoelKharb)MM,(MahilaCourt)03DwarkaCourts,ND.15.05.2015.

FIRNo.170/14StateVsGudduPSNajafgarh

15.05.2015.PW1/HCSultanSingh,NO.78/SW,PSDwarkaSouth.

OnSA

On 26.02.2014 I was posted at PS Najafgarh as Head

Constable. OnthatdayIwasworkingasDOandmydutytiming

wasfrom4.00pmto12.00midnight. Onthatday,SIVikashhad

presentedonetehrir.IregisteredtheaboveFIR.ThecopyofFIRis

Ex.PW1/A(OSR) bearing my signature at Point A and I made

endorsement on the said tehrir. My endorsement on the said

tehrir is Ex. PW1/B bearing my signature at Point A. After

registrationofthesameIhandedovertheCopyofFIRandoriginal

rukkatoSIVikashastheinvestigationismarkedtohim.

XXXXXXXXXbySh.S.P.STyagi,Ld.Counselforaccused.

Iwasondutyonthatdaybetween4.00pmto12.00midnight.

Ireceivedtherukkaon9.00pm.OnlySIVikashcametothePolice

StationforregistrationofFIR.Thecomplaintwasconvertedinto

rukka by making endorsement on the written complaint. It is

correct that the complainant did not cometo mealongwithSI

Vikash.ItiscorrectthatIhadnopersonalknowledgeregardingFIR

excepttothecomplaintsenttome.


FIRNo.170/14StateVsGudduPSNajafgarh

15.05.2015.

Present: Ld.APPfortheState.

AccusedGudduisabsent.

Sh.S.P.S.Tyagi,Ld.counselforaccused.

MHC(M)ispresent.

PW/HCSultanSinghandPW/Sunidhiarepresent.

Exemption application on behalf of accused Guddu

hasbeenmovedbyCounsel.

Heard.Considered.

Forthereasonsstatedintheapplication,exemptionof

theaccusedGudduisallowedfortodayonlysubjecttocondition

thatheshallnotdisputeidentityofthewitnessandtheevidence

shallberecordedinhisabsence.

PW1/HCSultanSinghexamined,crossexaminedand

discharged.

Complainant/PW Sunidhi is present today, however,

sheisdischargedunexaminedtodayasevidencerecordedinother

case.WitnessisbounddownforNDOH.

ListforRPEon06.06.2015.

RemainingPW'sbesummonedforNDOH.


FIRNo.143/13StateVsManoharLalPSNajafgarh

15.05.2015.PW4/Ct.JaiPalYadav,No.1255/SW,PostingSector19,DCPOffice,

DWarka.

OnSA

Intheinterveningnightof15.05.2013and16.05.2012I

waspostedatPSNajafgarhasCt..OnthatdayIwasonemergency

dutyandmydutytimingwasfrom8.00pmto8.00am.Onthatday

W/SIKavitahadcalledme frommyofficetoarresttheaccused

ManoharLalandhewasarrestedinmypresenceinthePSitself

videarrestmemoalreadyEx.PW1/BbearingmysignatureatPoint

X. (accused Manohar Lal present in the court today correctly

identified by witness). Thereafter the accused was personally

search in my presence vide personal search already Ex.PW1/C

bearingmysignatureatPointY.

XXXXXXXXbySh.A.K.Thakur,Ld.Counselforaccused.

Ataround12inthenightW/SIKavitacalledme.W/SI

Kavitacalledmeonmypersonalnumber.WhenW/SIKavitacalled

meaccusedandcomplainantbotharepresentinthePSNajafgarh

only.



15.05.2015.PW3/HCOmPrakash,No.803Traffic,PostingMayapuriCircle,

Delhi.

OnSA

On 15.05.2013, I was posted at PS Najafgarh as Head

Constable. OnthatdayIwasworkingasDOandmydutytiming

wasfrom12.00midnightto8.00am.OnthatdayW/SIKavitahad

presentedTehrironwhichIregisteredtheaboveFIR. Thecopyof

FIRisEx.PW3/A(OSR)bearingmysignatureatPointAandImade

endorsement on the said rukka. My endorsement on the said

rukka is Ex. PW3/B bearing my signature at Point A. After

registrationofthesameIhandedovertheCopyofFIRandoriginal

rukkatoW/SIKavita.TheinvestigationismarkedtoW/SIKavita.

XXXXXXXXbySh.A.K.Thakur,Ld.Counselforaccused.

Nil.Opportunitygiven.



15.05.2015.


Complainantinperson.

AccusedManoharLalinpersonalongwithLd.Counsel

Sh.A.K.Thakur.

PW3/HC Om Prakash and PW4/Ct. Jaipal Yadav

examined,crossexaminedanddischarged.

ListforPEon14.07.2015.



FIRNo.443/02StateVsRajesh&Ors.PSNajafgarh

15.05.2015.PW3/Ram Pyari W/o HarPal R/o RZ 1/70, New Roshan Pura,

Najafgarh,Delhi.Ageabout70years.

OnSA

TheMarriage was solemnizedat around1415years

backofcomplainantKiranwithaccusedVirender.Ihadsuggested

the boy to complainant's family being a relative of Kiran. After

sometimeofthemarriagetherewasaquarrelandpolicecameat

the residence of accused Virender. I do not knowanything else

regardingthiscase.Ihadnotgivenanystatementtothepolice.

Atthisstage,LdAPPseekspermissiontocrossexamine

thewitness.Thesameisallowed.

XXXXXXbyLd.APPfortheState.

ItiscorrectthatSukbirismybrother.Itisalsocorrect

thatSukbirhadspentenoughmoneyinthemarriage.Itiscorrect

thatSukbirhadgivenscooter,colourtv,fridge,allkindoffurniture

andgoldandsilverjeweleryarticles.Ihavebeentoldbyoneofthe

neighbor that the mother in law of the complainant Kiran had

givenbeatingstoherandconsequentlyVirenderleftKirantoher

parental house. It is wrong to suggest that any of the accused

demandedRs.2lakhsortheplotfromthecomplainant.Idonot

rememberwhetherthecomplainantKirancametomeandtoldme

that accusedpersonsweredemandingRs. 2 lakhsfor the jobof

accusedVirender.I alsodonotrememberwhetherIwenttothe

place of accused Virender to inquire the same and for

reconciliation.IneverwenttothehouseoftheaccusedVirenderin

this regard. It is wrong to suggest that the IO in this case have

recordedthestatement.ItiswrongtosuggestthatIamdeposing

falselyattheinstanceoftheaccusedpersons.

XXXXXXXXbySh.J.D.Sharma,Ld.Counselforaccusedperson.

Ihaveseentheabovesaidarticleswhichweregivenin

themarriage.


FIRNo.443/02StateVsRajesh&Ors.PSNajafgarh

15.05.2015.


Complainantinpersonalongwithherfather.

AccusedSaroj,Satbir,SunitaandShakuntalainperson.

AccusedRajeshisabsent.

AccusedVirenderhasalreadyexpired.

Sh.J.D.Sharma,Ld.Counselforaccusedpersons.

SummonissuedtoPWDO/ASIChintaRamreceived

backwiththereportthathehasexpired.

Inviewofthesame,DOASIChintaRamisdropped

fromthelistofprosecutionwitnesses.

Itissubmittedbythecounselforaccusedpersonsthat

accusedRajeshisunwell.Hence,hecouldnotappeartodaybefore

thecourttoday.

At request of counsel for accused Rajesh, his

exemptionisallowedfortodayonlysubjecttoconditionthathe

shallnotdisputeidentityofthewitnessandtheevidenceshallbe

recordedinhisabsence.

PW3/Ram Pyari examined, crossexamined and

discharged.




FIRNo:343/11 StateVsManojKumar

PS:Najafgarh15.05.2015.


AccusedManojisabsent.

Sh.DeepakMehar,ProxyCounselforaccused.

Exemption application on behalf of accused Manoj

KumarhasbeenmovedbyProxyCounsel.

Heard.Considered.

Forthereasonsstatedintheapplication,exemptionof

theaccusedManojKumarisallowedfortodayonly.

Itisorallysubmittedbytheproxycounselforaccused

thathewill positivelyfilequashingpetitionbeforeHon'bleHigh

CourtofDelhibeforetheNDOH.

Intheinterestofjustice,onelastopportunityisgranted

totheaccusedtofilethesame.

List for quashing of FIR/further proceedings on

22.07.2015.


CCNo:419/2/14 PriyankaVsDeepakKakkar&Ors.


Present: Complainant in person along with Ld counsel Sh.

RiteshOberoi.

Respondentsno.1,2&4areabsent.

WSaswellasincomeaffidavitnotfiledtherespondent

tilldate.Furtherrespondentshavenotappearedbeforethecourt

despiterepeatedcallssincemorning.Accordingly,respondentsno.

1,2&4areproceededexparte.

At this stage, Ld. counsel for the complainant has

placedonrecordthephotocopyoforderunderSection125CrPCof

Ld. Family Court, Dwarka, whereby interim maintenance @ Rs.

3,000/permonthis grantedtothecomplainantapart fromthe

litigationexpensesofRs.8,000/.

Inviewofthesame,complainantsubmitsthatsheis

notpressingforreliefofinterimmaintenancebeforethiscourt.

List for expartecomplainant evidence/exparte final

argumentson07.07.2015at1:00P.M.


FIRNo:411/12 StateVsRajeshSharma&Ors.



Accusedpersonsareabsent.

Court notice not issued. Court notice be issued to

accused persons to appear in person before the court on

25.05.2015.


FIRNo:230/07 StateVsRanjeetetc.



Accused Brijesh and Urmila are permanently

exempted.

AccusedSewaRamandKumeshareabsent.

Sh.AklantJain,Ld.Counselforaccusedpersons.

Finalargumentsheard.

List for clarifications, if any/orders on 25.05.2015 at

2:00P.M.


CCNo:20/3/14 RashmiVsNeerajKumar

PS:NajafgarhunderSection156(3)CrPC

15.05.2015.

Present: Complainantisabsent.

Complainant has not appeared before the court

despiteserviceofnotice.

Intheinterestofjustice,onelastopportunityisgranted

toappearinpersonbeforethecourt,failingwhichapplicationshall

bedismissedfornonprosecution.

Listforappearanceofthecomplainanton15.07.2015.


Ex.No:05/14 SakshiVsLalit


Present: DHinperson.

JDisabsent.

BailablewarrantsbeissuedagainsttheJDinthesumof

Rs 10,000/ with one surety in the like amount, returnable for

03.07.2015.


FIRNo:109/11 StateVsSadhuRam



Accusedisabsent.

Smt.KirpaDevi,SuretyoftheaccusedSadhuRamis

absent.

Issue Bailable warrant against the Kirpa Devi in the

sumofRs5,000/withonesuretyinthelikeamount.

Process under Section 82 CrPC issued against the

accusedSadhuRamreceivedexecuted.Reportperused.

Issuecourtnoticetotheprocessservertorecordinghis

statementfor27.06.2015.


FIRNo:409/13 StateVsMohanBharti

PS:Najafgarh15.05.2015.Present: Ld.APPforState.

Sh.SanjayKumar,CounselforaccusedMohanBharti.

IO/ASIAsmitaispresent.

Ld.Counselfortheaccusedhasmovedanapplication

formodificationoforderdated06.05.2015.Hehasmovedanother

applicationforgrantofbailofaccusedMohanBhartiunderSection

437CrPC.

StatusreportfiledbyIO.Samebetakenonrecord. IO

further submits that accused Mohan Bharti is not required for

furtherinvestigationinthiscase.

Submissionsheard.Considered.

As the accused is in J/C since 09.05.2015 and

investigationquahimiscomplete,courtdeemsit appropriateto

grantbailtoaccusedMohanBharti.Bothapplicationsareallowed.

AccusedMohanBhartiisadmittedtobailinthesumofRs20,000/

withonelikesuretyandsubjecttofollowingconditions:

1.Accusedwillcooperateintheinvestigationofthiscase.

2.Accusedwillnotinfluence/threaten/inducethewitnesses.

3.Ifincaseaccusedchangeshisresidentialaddressinfuture,he

willgiveduewrittenintimationtotheIO.

4. The violation of above stated conditions will automatically

resultincancellationofbailandforfeitureofsurety.

Boththeapplicationsstanddisposedoff.

Copyoftheorderbegivendasti.


CCNo:398/2/14 NirupamaVsRohit

PS:DwkNorth15.05.2015.

Present Complainantisabsent.MsAlkaSrivastava,Ldcounselforthecomplainant.

Matter is still pending before Mediation Centre for

16.05.15.

At request, list for report regarding Mediation, if

any/furtherproceedingson03.07.15.


CCNo:266/2/14 HimanshiVsJiteshLohchab


StatementofcomplainantHimanshiW/oSh.JitenderLochabD/oSh.KuldeepSinghDabasR/o603A,JanakResidency,Plotno12,Sec18A,Dwarka,NewDelhi,agedabout26years.OnSA

Ihaveamicablysettledthecasewithrespondentno.1

Sh. Jitesh Lohchab who is my husband, towards full and final

settlementamountofRs.40lakhoutofwhichIhavereceivedRs.20

lakh(atthetimeofanticipatorybail&anotheratthetimeoffirst

motion).ThirdinstallmentofRs10Lakhistobepaidatthetimeof

filingsecondmotionofdivorce&thelastinstallmentofRs10Lakh

at the time of quashing of FIR. Copy of MOU/settlement dated

19.01.2015 is Ex. P1. I am ready to abide by all the terms and

conditionsofthesettlement.Imaybepermittedtowithdrawthe

present case. I amgiving this statement voluntarily without any

force,threat,coercionorundueinfluence.




StatementofSh.JiteshLohchabS/oSh.RajinderSinghLohchabR/oHouseno.1095,Sector 1,Rohtak,Haryana.agedabout 32years.OnSA

Ihaveamicablysettledthecasewiththecomplainant

whoismywifetowardsfullandfinalsettlementamountofRs.40

lacs out of which I have paid Rs. 20 lakhs (at the time of

anticipatory bail & another at the time of first motion). Third

installmentofRs10Lakhwillbepaidbymeatthetimeoffiling

secondmotionofdivorce&thelastinstallmentofRs10Lakhatthe

time of quashing of FIR. Copy of MOU/settlement dated

19.01.2015 is already Ex. P1. I will abide by all the terms and

conditionsofthesettlement.Iamgivingthisstatementvoluntarily

withoutanyforce,threat,coercionorundueinfluence.




Present ComplainantinpersonalongwithLdcounselSh.YSChauhan.Respondentinperson.

Partieshadamicablysettledthecasebeforethecourt

on28.02.2015towardsfull andfinalsettlementamountofRs.40

lakhsoutofwhichcomplainanthasalreadyreceivedRs.20lakhs.

Complainant submits that she wants to withdraw the present

application.

Separate statements of complainant and respondent

hasbeenrecordedtothiseffect.Boththepartieshaveundertaken

tocomplywithallthetermsandconditionsofsettlement.


Inviewofstatementsofthecomplainantaswellasof

therespondent,thepresentmatterisdisposedoffassettled.

Filebeconsignedtorecordroom.


CCNo:133/2/14 ParvinderVsMohanPreet


Present Complainantisabsent.Respondent in person along with Ld counsel Ms. RanjeetBedi.

MatterisfixedforRE.

Counsel for therespondentsubmits thatevidenceof

therespondentisalreadyonrecord,however,sheseekssometime

tomoveanapplicationforseekingopportunitytocrossexamine

thecomplainant.

Listforfurtherproceedingson08.07.15.

Courtnoticebeissuedtothecomplainanttoappear

beforethecourtontheNDOH.


CCNo:30/2/15 NehaVsNaresh


Present Complainant in person along with Ld counsel Ms MeenakshiGupta.Respondentno1inpersonalongwithLdcounselSh.VikramBawaja.

Replicationaswellasdetailedincomeaffidavitfiledby

therespondent.Copyofthesameissuppliedtothecomplainant.

Complainantsubmitsthatrespondenthasnotfiledhis

entiredocumentsregardingexpensesasmentionedinhisaffidavit.

Respondent is directed to file the same positively

beforeNDOH.

Listforargumentsoninterimreliefon29.06.15.


CCNo:374/2/14 ChanderBalaVsGianSingh

PS:Bindapur

15.05.2015.

Present ComplainantinpersonalongwithLdcounselSh.A.K.

Thakur.

Respondent in person along with Ld counsel Sh.

RavinderKumar.

Fresh vakalatnama filed onbehalf of respondent. Be

takenonrecord.

Matter is fixed for arguments on interim relief of

maintenance.

Counselfortherespondentssubmitsthathehasbeen

recentlyengagedinthiscaseandseeksonelastopportunitytofile

WS.Hefurthersubmitsthatcomplainantwasworkingasamaidin

the house of the respondent and later on she forged certain

documents of her daughter and showed the name of the

respondentasafatherofherdaughterinthosedocuments.Butthe

factisthatrespondentnevermarriedwiththecomplainant.

Initially, counsel for the complainant submits that

complainant is a legal married wife of the respondent, later on

counselforthecomplainantsubmittedthatcomplainantstayedin

aliveinrelationshipwiththerespondentfor1819yearsandlater

on married with him. Complainant also submits that she has

mentionedinherapplicationunderSection12ofPWDVActthat

respondenthasstolenall thedocuments includingthemarriage

photographsandGPAofthehouse.

Complainantisdirectedtoleadevidenceregardingher

marriage/liveinrelationshipwithrespondentontheNDOHas

(2)

themattercanonlyproceedfurtherafterthepreliminaryissueof

marriageisdecided.



CCNo:234/2/14 PreetiVsVishalGehlot


Present Complainant in person along with Ld counsel Sh. Javed.Respondentno1inpersonalongwithLdcounselSh.AnilKumar.

MatterisstatedtobependingbeforeMediationcentre

for29.05.15.

Itissubmittedbythecounselforthecomplainantthat

complainantwantstogetthebirthcertificateofherdaughterbut

samecouldnotmadebecauseoflackofanyidentityproofofher

husbandandelectricitybillofthehousewherethechildwasborn.

Respondentsubmitsthathewill makeeffortstolook

fortheabovedocumentsandbringinthecourtontheNDOH,if

available.

Atrequest,listforreportregardingMediation/further

proceedingson29.05.15.


FIRNo:82/10 StateVsRakeshSharma


Present: Ld.APPfortheState.Complainantisabsent.Accusedinperson.

Accused submits that he shall positively file second

motionofdivorcebeforeFamilycourton20.05.15&thereafterhe

willfilequashingpetitionbeforeHon'bleHighCourtofDelhi.

At request, one last opportunity is granted to the

accusedfailingwhichmatterwillproceedonmerits.



FIRNo:330/02 StateVsRoshanLal


Present: Ld.APPfortheState.Motherofthecomplainantispresent.AccusedRoshaninpersonalongwithLdcounselSh HaneefMohammad.AccusedBhagwatiDevi,BhagoDevi,BantoDevi,PakoDevi,MeeraDeviandDarshanChandarepermanentlyexempted.

PW3/Rajinder Kaul further crossexamined and

discharged.

Applicationu/s311CrPCwasmovedbythecounselfor

theaccusedforrecallingPW2SitaRaniasawitness.Itisstatedon

thelastdateofhearingthatmotherofthecounseloftheaccused

got paralysis attack and hence, he could not appear before the

courtforcrossexaminationofthewitness.

ApplicationisstronglyopposedbytheLdAPPonthe

groundthataccusedhadalreadytakensufficientopportunitiesto

crossexaminePW2.


Courtisoftheopinionthataccusedshouldnotsuffer

duetohiscounsel's personaldifficulty,hence,intheinterestof

justice,applicationu/s311CrPCisallowedandaccusedisgranted

only one effective opportunity to crossexamine PW2 Sita Rani,

failingwhichnofurtheropportunitywillbegranted.


PW2SitaRaniandremainingwitnessesbesummoned

fortheNDOH.


FIRNo:246/12 StateVsRaviParashar PS:Bindapur15.05.2015.

CHARGE

I,ManuGoelKharb,MM/MahilaCourt03,NewDelhi,

doherebychargeyouaccusedRaviParasharasunder:

That after the date of marriage i.e 21.03.2010 of the

complainantBhartiKalrawithyou,atthematrimonialhouseand

atallotherplacesasmentionedincomplaint,withinjurisdictionof

PSBindapur, youRaviParashar subjectedthecomplainantwith

cruelty inconnection with demand of dowry and thereby

committedanoffencepunishable U/s498AIPC andwithinmy

cognizance.

Thatonthesamedateandtime,attheaforesaidplace,

youRaviParasharwasentrustedwiththeStridhanarticlesofthe

complainantwhichyourefusedtoreturnondemandandthereby

committed offence punishable U/s 406 IPC and within my

cognizance.

AndIherebydirectthatyoubetriedbythiscourtfor

thesaidoffences.

MM/MahilaCourt03

The charge is read over and explained to the accused, who isquestionedasunder:Q.Doyoupleadguiltyorclaimtrial?AnsIdonotpleadguiltyandclaimtrial.

RO&AC (ManuGoelKharb)MM,(MahilaCourt)03DwarkaCourts,NewDelhi.15.05.15.

FIRNo:246/12 StateVsRaviParashar PS:Bindapur15.05.2015.

Present: Ld.APPfortheState.Complainant in person along with Ld counsel Sh RajeevPandey.AccusedinpersonalongwithLd. counsel Sh. Vinay KumarJha.

Argumentsonchargeheard.

CounselfortheaccusedRaviParasharhasconcededto

thechargesu/s498A/406IPCagainsttheaccused.

In view of the same, charge for the offence u/s

498A/406IPCisframedagainstaccusedRaviParashar,towhichthe

accusedhaspleadednotguiltyandclaimedtrial.


PW'sbesummonedforthenextdateofhearing.


CCNo:25/3/14 BhartiVsRaviParashar


Present Complainant in person along with Ld counsel Sh RajeevPandey.AccusedinpersonalongwithLd. counsel Sh. Vinay KumarJha.

In ordersheet dated 24.11.2014, it is reflected that

counsel for the complainant mentioned that cognizance under

Section494IPChasbeentakenbythiscourtinFIRno.246/12,PS

Bindapurhowever inthe latter case, cognizanceis takenforthe

offenceunderSection498A/406IPC.Hence,onetrialcannotbe

conductedinboththesecases.

Summonsinthepresentcomplaintcasehavealready

beenissuedagainsttheaccusedbytheCourtof Sh. Vikram,Ld.

MM,DwarkaCourts,andtheaccusedhasappearedinpursuance

thereof.

Listnowforprechargeevidenceon22.07.15.


CCNo:396/2/14 SumanVsShailenderKumar

PS:DwkNorth15.05.2015.Present ComplainantinpersonalongwithLdcounselSh.J.B.

Malik.Respondentno1inperson.

MatterreceivedbackunsettledfromMediationCentre.

Detailedincomeaffidavit filedbytherespondent. Be

takenonrecord.Copysupplied.

Vide this order, the court shall dispose off the

application of the complainant regarding interim relief of

maintenance u/s 23(2) of Protection of Women from Domestic

ViolenceAct2005.

Complainanthasstatedinherapplicationthatshegot

marriedwiththerespondentno.1ShailenderKumaron26.02.2009

accordingtoHinduritesandceremoniesandonegirlchildnamely

Ananayawasbornouton02.06.2011ofthewedlock.Butsincethe

date of marriage, she is being tortured and humiliated by the

respondentsforbringinginsufficientdowry.Complainanthasalso

mentioned about demanding money and drinking apart from

variousincidentsofmentalandphysicalcrueltyatthehandsofthe

respondents.Shefurtherallegesthatonmorethanoneoccasion,

respondents havethrownher out of the matrimonial homeand

nowsince03.06.2014,sheisstayingatherparentalhouseandis

totallydependentonherparentsforsubsistenceofherself&her

minorchild.Shefurtherallegesthatrespondentno.1isgainfully

employedasaclerkcumcashierinRamgarhiaCooperativeBank

LtdatNo3,SatyamPark,BagatSinghRoad,KrishnaNagar,Delhi

andisdrawingasalaryofRs25,000/permonth&anextraincome

ofRs10,000/fromhispropertyathisnativeplace.

Respondentno1appearedbeforethecourtandfiled

hisreplytotheapplicationundersection23(2)ofPWDVActfiled

bythecomplainantwhereinhedeniedalltheallegationsleveledby

thecomplainant. Respondentno.1hasfiledhisincomeaffidavit

todayinwhichhe statedthathissalaryasRs12,998/permonth

andheearnsRs.54,000/perannumasheisalsoworkingasaLIC

agent.

I haveheardthesubmissionof boththeparties and

perusedallthedocuments.

Complainanthasnotbroughtonrecordanydocument

toshowthatrespondentno1isearningRs.35,000/permonth.

Now the admitted position is that respondent no.1 is currently

earningaroundRs.17,500/permonth.So,keeping2portionsof

the admitted income for himself, respondent no. 1 Shailender

KumarisdirectedtopayaninterimmaintenanceofRs.4,300/per

monthforthecomplainant&Rs4,300/permonthforthegirlchild

namelyAnanayafromthedateoffilingofapplicationtillthedate

offinaldisposalofthiscase.

Respondentno.1isfurtherdirectedtoclearthearrears

of maintenance within 3 months from the date of the order.

Paymenthastobemadeonthe5thdayofeachmonthbydepositing

the same directly in the bank account of the complainant, the

details of which shall be provided by the complainant to the

protectionofficeraswellasrespondentShailenderKumar.

Amountofmaintenancepaidinanyotherproceedings

shallbeadjusted.Applicationstandsdisposedoffwithregardtothe

interimreliefofmaintenance.

ListforCEon24.07.2015.


CCNo:13/2/15 KrishnaVsJoginderKumar


Present ComplainantinpersonalongwithLdcounselSh.YKDubey.Respondentno1inpersonalongwithLdcounselSh.SPVerma.

Videthisorder,courtshalldisposeofftheapplication

of the complainant regarding interim relief of maintenance u/s

23(2)ofProtectionofWomenfromDomesticViolenceAct2005.

Complainanthasstatedinherapplicationthatshegot

married with respondent no.1 Joginder Kumar on 13.02.2005

according to Hindu rites and ceremonies and 'twin' children

namely Lakshya & Deepika were born out of the wedlock on

30.12.2006 but since the day of marriage, she is being tortured

mentally and physically by the respondent no. 1 and other

respondents for demand of dowry. It is further alleged that

respondentno.1isinahabitofdrinkingandharassherthereafter

andrespondentno1pressurizesthecomplainanttoseekadivorce

so that he can marry his girlfriend and also threatened her to

commit suicide if shedoesnot leavehim.Complainantsubmits

thatsheisnotworkingandissolelydependentonherparentsfor

subsistenceofherself.

Respondentno.1appearedbeforethecourtandfiled

hisreplytotheapplicationundersection12ofPWDVActfiledby

thecomplainantwhereinhedeniedalltheallegationslevelledby

the complainant. In his detailed income affidavit, he has

mentionedthatheisdoingaprivatejobanddrawingasalaryofRs

14,000/ per month and he has a liability to maintain the twin

childrenwhoarelivingwithhim.

I haveheardthesubmissionof boththeparties and

perusedallthedocuments.

Complainanthasnotbroughtonrecordanydocument

toshowtheincomeofrespondentno.1.Intheentirereplyfiledby

the respondent, there is no averment regarding the earning

capacityofthecomplainant.

Asperthesubmissionmadebyrespondentno1,his

admitted salary is Rs 14,000/ per month. Respondent no. 1 is

liabletomaintainhiswifeKrishna&thetwochildren.So,keeping2

portions of the admitted income for himself, respondent no. 1

JoginderKumarisdirectedtopayaninterimmaintenanceofRs.

2,800/permonthforthecomplainantfromthedateoffilingof

applicationi.e.20.01.15tillthedateoffinaldisposal.

Respondentno.1isfurtherdirectedtoclearthearrears

of maintenance within 3 months from the date of the order.

Paymenthastobemadeonthe5thdayofeachmonthbydepositing

the same directly in the bank account of the complainant, the

detailsofwhichshallbeprovidedbythecomplainanttothe

protectionofficeraswellasrespondentno.1JoginderKumar.

Amountofmaintenancepaidinanyotherproceedings

shallbeadjusted.Applicationstandsdisposedoffwithregardtothe

interimreliefofmaintenance.

At this stage, complainant has moved another

application u/s 23 (2) r/w Sec 21 of PWDV Act for seeking

temporary custody of the children Lakshya & Deepika. Copy

supplied.

List for reply/arguments on the application on

29.05.2015.


CCNo:64/2/15 ShikhaVsSahilSaranSahai


Fresh file received from facilitation Centre. It be checked andregistered.Present: ComplainantinpersonalongwithLdCounselSh.Jai

DevSolanki.

This is an application filed u/s 12 of Protection of

WomenfromDomesticViolenceAct2005.

Sufficient material has been placed on record to

proceed against respondents no 1 to 4. Summonbe issued to

respondentsno.1to4onfilingofPF/RCwithin5workingdays.In

caseof refusal or nonavailability or house locked, summonsbe

servedbywayofaffixation.

Complainanthasmentionedinparaxiiiatpageno8of

theapplicationthatrespondentno1isworkinginDubai.Hence,

Respondent no. 1 be summoned, at his Dubai address, to be

furnishedbythecomplainant,atthetimeoffilingPF.

Notice be issued to Protection Officer for filing DIR

reportwithinoneweek.

Fixforappearanceandreplyon09.07.2015.


FIRNo:180/12 StateVsManishKumarSuri

PS:Bindapur15.05.2015.Cancellation report received from facilitation centre. It becheckedandregistered.


Cancellationreportperused.Considered.

True copy of order of Honble High Court of Delhi

dated27.02.2015inCrl.M.C.no.755/2015titledManishKumar

Suri &Ors.Vs.TheState (NCTof Delhi) andAnr. (Hon'ble Mr.

JusticeManmohanSingh)received,videwhichpresentFIRno.

180/12,u/s 498A/406/34 IPC,PSBindapur and theconsequent

proceedingshavebeenquashedaftersettlement.

Inviewofthesame,accusedstandsdischarged.

Personal bond and surety bond of accused stands

discharged. Original documents, if any, be released to the

authorizedpersonsonproperreceiptandendorsement,ifany,be

cancelled.

FilebeconsignedtoRecordRoom.


FIRNo:737/14 StateVsRaju@Thapa

PS:Bindapur15.05.2015.Freshchargesheetreceivedfromfacilitationcentre.Itbecheckedandregistered.


Fileperused.Considered.

I take cognizance of the offence u/s

451/354/323/506/34 IPC against accused persons mentioned in

columnno11 i.e. Raju@Thapa&Harshit Kashyav. Ahlmad is

directedtoaffixmiscellaneouspaperswiththefile.

Summonsbeissuedtoboththeabovenamedaccused

persons and notice to their sureties for appearance, supply of

copiesandregularbailon09.07.15.


FIRNo:134/12 StateVsDevinderKumar

PS:Bindapur15.05.2015.Freshchargesheetreceivedfromfacilitationcentre.Itbecheckedandregistered.



Itakecognizanceoftheoffenceu/s 498A/406/34 IPC

againstaccusedpersonsmentionedincolumnno11i.e.Devinder

Kumar, Premvati & Harbans Lal. Ahlmad is directed to affix

miscellaneouspaperswiththefile.

Summonsbeissuedtoalltheabovenamedaccused

persons and notice to their sureties for appearance, supply of

copiesandregularbailon08.07.15.


FIRNo:790/14 StateVsRoshan

PS:DwkNorth15.05.2015.Freshchargesheetreceivedfromfacilitationcentre.Itbecheckedandregistered.



I take cognizance of the offence u/s 354/354D IPC

againstaccusedpersonsmentionedincolumnno11i.e.Roshan@

Santosh.Ahlmadisdirectedtoaffixmiscellaneouspaperswiththe

file.

Summonsbeissuedtotheabovenamedaccusedand

noticetohissuretyforappearance,supplyofcopiesandregular

bailon07.07.15.


CCNo:194/2/14 NishaVsChaitanyaKumar

PS:Bindapur15.05.2015.Present: Complainant in person with Counsel Sh. A.K.

Thakur.Respondentno.2inperson.Respondentno.1&3areabsent.Sh.AmitabhJha,Counselonbehalfoftherespondents.

Counsel for the respondents has moved separate

applicationsonbehalfofrespondentChaitanyaKumarandManju

Roy for their exemption from personal appearance. Both the

applicationsareappendedwithmedicaldocumentsofChaitanya

Kumar. Another application is moved by the counsel for the

respondentu/s25&28(2)ofPWDVActforwaiverofcostimposed

uponalltherespondentsontheLDOHandforextensionoftimeto

file WSandincomeaffidavit of therespondent. Inall the above

applications(exemptionapplicationsaswellaswaiverofcostand

enlargement of time to file WS and detailed income affidavit),

counsel for the respondents has taken the same ground that

respondentno.1issufferingfromseverementaldisorderandis

underpsychiatrictreatmentsinceJan.2015.

Applicationsareopposedbythecomplainantonthe

ground that she had filed the application under Section 12 of

PWDVActlongbackbuttilldaterespondentshavenotevenfiled

WS.


Respondents have placed on record certain medical

documentsandacertificate issuedbythePsychiatricconsultant

Dr.SumitPathareinwhichapartfromotherthingsthedoctorhas

specifically mentioned that patient is not fit for travel whereas

generally, in medical field no psychiatric consultant gives a

certificatetotheeffectwhetherthepatientisfittotravel.So,court

has certain reservations regarding the medical certificate of

ChaitanyaKumarfiledbythecounselfortherespondent.

But,forthetimebeing,believingthemedicalailment

of resp no. 1 and the certificate of the doctor to be genuine,

applications for exemption of respondents no. 1 and 3 from

personal appearance is allowed for today. For the same reason,

applicationofrespondentno.1ChaitanyaKumarforextensionof

timeisallowedandheisgrantedanotheropportunitytofileWS

and detailed income affidavit. Further, respondent Chaitanya

Kumar is directed to appear in person before the court on the

NDOH,sothatcourtcanmakeanassessmentregardingthemental

conditionoftherespondentandtillthenhisrequestforwaivingof

costiskeptpending.

So far as submissions of respondent no. 2 and3 for

extendingtimetofileWSorwaivingcostareconcerned,courtis

unabletofathomanyreasonfortheirnonfilingofWStilldate.On

the last date of hearing, right to file WS was made subject to

paymentofcostofRs.2000/eachbytherespondentsandtoday

againratherthanfilingtheWS,respondentsaremoreinterestedin

movinganapplicationforwaiverofcostandsomemoretimetofile

WSwithoutanyplausibleexplanationtothiseffect.Noreasonis

madeouteitherforwaiverofcostorforextensionoftimetofile

WS. Accordingly, the said applications are dismissed qua

respondent no. 2 & 3. Further as no WS is filed today also,

respondentno2&3areproceededExparte.

List for appearance of respondent no.1 and further

proceedingson08.07.15.


list_new2.asp(2)

Documents