TITLE OF THE CASE PAGEESTATE TAXATION 1Lorenzo vs. Posadas1Corre vs. Tan Corre 3Collector vs. Fiser !Collector vs. Norton "Collector vs. Ca#$os %&eda 11%a'ael (izon vs. CTA) CI% 1*(ONO%S TAXATION 3+Lladoc vs. Co##issioner 1,Pirovano vs. Co##issioner +-Tan. Ho vs. /oard o' Ta0 A$$eals ++A1ello vs. CI%) CA +!2AL3E A((E( TAX 3+4a$atiran) etc. vs. Tan 3*A1a5ada G&ro vs. E0. Sec. Er#ita 3,CI% vs. Ce1& To6o Cor$. 3"CI% vs. Sea.ate Tec *+Atlas Consolidated vs. CI% *3CI% vs. 7anila 7inin. Cor$. *8Pa.cor vs. CI% *"CI% vs. Pil Healt Care 81Fort /oni'acio vs. CI% 83Tosi1a vs. CI% 887indanao Geoter#al vs. CI% 8,CI% vs. San %o9&e Po:er) etc. 8"OTHE% PE%CENTAGE TAXES !*CI% vs. %o6al Inter Ocean Lines !!CI% vs. Ll&iller !;CI% vs. /PI !"Pil. /as5et1all Assn vs. CTA ,1EXCISE TAXES ON CE%TAIN GOO(SCI% vs. CA STA7P TAXLincoln Pil Ins&rance vs. CACI% vs. Lincoln PilsCina /an5in. Cor$oration vs. CI%Ta#1&ntin. Pa:nso$ vs. CI%M I D T E R M S%E7E(IESCO3%T OF TAX APPEALSTA%IFF AN( C3STO7S CO(ELOCAL GO2E%N7ENT TAXATION