lisa double bhs
DESCRIPTION
LISA double BHs. Dynamics in gaseous nuclear disk. Outlines. Dynamical evolution of MBHBs Code introduction Initial conditions of the simulations Results Future work. MBHs coalescence (1). Collisionless background (Begelman, Blanford & Rees 1980). ● Dynamical friction - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
LISA double BHs
Dynamics in gaseous nuclear disk
![Page 2: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Outlines
• Dynamical evolution of MBHBs
• Code introduction
• Initial conditions of the simulations
• Results
• Future work
![Page 3: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
MBHs coalescence (1)
● Dynamical friction (tidal stripping, efficient only for “major mergers”)
● Three body interactions (loss cone depletion… ask to Sesana)
● Gravitational wave emission
Collisionless background (Begelman, Blanford & Rees 1980)
![Page 4: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
MBHs coalescence (2)
Gaseous background
● Dynamical friction (2) (Escala, Larson, Coppi & Maradones 2004)
● Gravitational torque by ellipsoidal deformation (Escala, Larson, Coppi & Maradones 2004)
● Gravitational wave emission
● Gravitational torque in circumnuclear gap (Armitage & Natarajan 2005)
● Dynamical friction (1) (Kazantzidis et al. 2005)
![Page 5: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Stellar bulge (Plummer):
Gaseous disk (Mestel):
Initial condition
Equation of state
P=K ργ γ = 5/3 (pure adiabatic evolution)
![Page 6: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Code: Gadget Springel, Yoshida & White 2001
SPH: Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics
Stellar and gaseous environment are sampled statistically (Monte Carlo)
Any “particle” has a spherical distribution of mass:
![Page 7: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Code: Gadget Springel, Yoshida & White 2001
Gravitational potential is computed with a tree algorithm
Computational cost ~ N log N
Cell opening criterion: Ml2/r4 < α2 M/r2
α > r / l (geometrical criterium)
Euler equation(for gas particles)
![Page 8: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Escala et al. 2005 Dotti et al. in preparation
MDISK = 5 10 9 M
RDISK = 400 pcMBULGE = 6.98 MDISK
a = 200 pc
MDISK = 10 8 M
RDISK = 109 pcMBULGE = 6.98 MDISK
a = 55 pc
Parameters varying:
Clumpiness
Orbital inclination angle
BH to gas mass ratio
Parameters varying:
BH1 to BH2 mass ratio
Eccentricity
2.6 × 10 5 K < T < 4.2 × 10 5 K
i = 0 º i = 22.5 ºi = 45 º i = 67.5 º
0.010.030.050.10.30.5
Dotti et al. in preparation
MDISK = 10 8 M
RDISK = 109 pcMBULGE = 6.98 MDISK
a = 55 pc
Parameters varying:
BH1 to BH2 mass ratio
Eccentricity
T ~ 10 4 K
![Page 9: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Run A: (equal mass / circular)
![Page 10: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Run A: (equal mass / circular)
![Page 11: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Run B: (equal mass / elliptical)
![Page 12: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Run E: (equal mass / elliptical / no gas)
Predicted by: Colpi et al. 1999 van den Bosch et al. 1999
![Page 13: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Run A / B: (equal mass)
Escala et al. 2004
![Page 14: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Run C: (unequal mass / circular)
![Page 15: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Run D: (unequal mass / elliptical)
![Page 16: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Run F (unequal mass / elliptical /retrograde )
![Page 17: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Accretion implications
Variation of the mass of one of BHs in binary has some dynamical effects… If angular momentum is conserved:
Sesana et al. in preparation
![Page 18: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Scale considerations (1)
In my simulation we have a spatial resolution of ~ 1 pc
For this separation, the two MBHs can not coalesce in an Hubble time for GW emission.
We are preparing higher resolution simulations, but ...
“using finer and finer resolution may be a waste of time unless the physics is consistent with the scale”
Take home message I, Joe Monaghan.
![Page 19: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Scale considerations (2)
High resolution simulations (HRSs) could investigate long-scales of the order of accretion radius of ours MBHs, of the local instability of a realistic self gravitating disk, etc.
So, HRSs allow (and force) us to implement new featuresof the code, corresponding to different physical phenomena:
• Star formation
• Black holes treated as sink particles
• Realistic cooling-heating
![Page 20: LISA double BHs](https://reader035.vdocuments.us/reader035/viewer/2022062217/568145ef550346895db2f540/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Scale considerations (3)
HRSs imply an increase of computational time
With the collaboration of Simone Callegari, a student ofMilano Bicocca, we are modifying the code to include anarbitrary static component of the gravitational potential in order to reduce the number of “live” particles without losing resolution
As a test, we run a simulation of a Hernquist stellar Bulge in a NFW halo of DM, with an “live” halo and a “dead” halo