lirics mid-term review 1 wp5 adam funk [email protected] university of sheffield 23rd may 2006
TRANSCRIPT
LIRICS mid-term review 2
Acknowledgements
Niraj AswaniGil FrancopolouMarc Kemps-SnijdersJulien NiochePeter Wittenburg
LIRICS mid-term review 3
Service-oriented architecture
Operations are carried out by exchanging messages according to web service standards (XML, SOAP)
Benefits: interoperability between domains, applications,
users composability encapsulation and abstraction (users don’t worry
about the details)
LIRICS mid-term review 4
Selling points
Standardizing concepts through the Data Category Registry allows easy cross-resource comparisons of
annotations and lexical entries interaction between them, e.g. using
annotated content as examples for lexical entries
tools to annotate semi-automatically using information from various lexica
LIRICS mid-term review 5
T5.1: Architecture
D5.1.A: API for DCRegistry v2, due M12, done
D5.1.B: API for LMF v1, due M12, doneD5.1.C: API for MAF v1, due M12, doneAPIs:
XML-based language-independent for web services
LIRICS mid-term review 6
T5.2: Ref. implementations
D5.2.A: DCR ref. imp. v1, due M12, done
D5.2.C: MAF ref. imp. V1, due M24, available now for English and French
LIRICS mid-term review 7
T5.3: Integration platform
D5.3.A & B: platform software and documentation v1, due M18MAF client available now
LIRICS mid-term review 8
T5.4: Data Category Usage Platform
D5.4.A & B: software and documentation v1, due M18
LIRICS mid-term review 9
Demonstration
An example MAF client connecting to reference implementations of MAF services for English and Bulgarian