liquidity ratios its me

32
Financial statement analysis of Modern Collection pvt. ltd. Through ratio analysis

Post on 13-Sep-2014

1.101 views

Category:

Technology


1 download

DESCRIPTION

 

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Liquidity ratios  its me

Financial statement analysis of Modern Collection pvt. ltd.

Through ratio analysis

Page 2: Liquidity ratios  its me

LIQUIDITY RATIOCURRENT RATIO

Current Assets Current ratio = ------------------------- Current Liabilities 

Year Current Assets Current Liabilities Current Ratio

2006-2007 24678965 21128392 1.16

2007-2008 21588683 11339964 1.90

2008-2009 20683915 25537988 0.80

ANALYSIS The current ratio decreased to 1.16 in the year 2006-2007 , and again it is increased to 1.90 in 2007-2008, later it is again fallen down to 0.80. This shows that there is no improvement in the short-term solvency of the company for the year 2008-2009.  

Page 3: Liquidity ratios  its me

Current Ratio0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

1.6

1.8

22006-20072007-20082008-2009

INTERPRETATION:  Due to instability in the rate of ratios, it shows that there is no improvement in the short-term solvency of the company for the year 2008-2009.  

Page 4: Liquidity ratios  its me

ACID TEST RATIO Liquid Assets Acid test ratio = ---------------------------- Current liabilities

Year Liquid assets Current liabilities Liquid ratio

2006-2007 23362359 21128392 1.10

2007-2008 15428377 11339964 1.36

2008-2009 16701025 25537988 0.65

ANALYSIS The liquid ratio is decreased to 1.10 in the year 2006-2007 , and again it is increased to 1.36 in the year 2007-2008. This further confirms that there are fluctuations in the short-term liquidity . 

Page 5: Liquidity ratios  its me

Liquid ratio0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.42006-20072007-20082008-2009

INTERPRETATION: This further confirms that there are fluctuations in the short-term liquidity of the company. This is mainly because of low realization of sundry debtors and an in increase in quick assets and decrease in cash and bank.

Page 6: Liquidity ratios  its me

SOLVENCY RATIODEBT-EQUITY RATIO

Total debts Debt-Equity ratio = ---------------------- Equity

Year Total debt Equity Debt-Equity Ratio

2006-2007 24812845 28416205 0.87

2007-2008 15626471 28057713 0.56

2008-2009 14358681 30391887 0.47

ANALYSIS Debt equity ratio is 0.87 in 2006-2007 and it is decreased to 0.56 in the year 2007-2008 though it was decreased to 0.47 in the year 2008-2009. This shows that there is improvement in the long-term solvency position of the company. 

Page 7: Liquidity ratios  its me

GRAPH SHOWING DEBT-EQUITY RATIO

Debt-Equity Ratio0

0.10.20.30.40.50.60.70.80.9

2006-20072007-20082008-2009

INTERPRETATION:It indicates the relative proportions of capital contribution by creditors and shareholders.

Page 8: Liquidity ratios  its me

 PROPRIETORY RATIO

EquityProprietory Ratio = ----------------------

Total Asset

Year Equity Total Assets Proprietory Ratio

2006-2007 28416205 53229050 0.53

2007-2008 28057713 43684184 0.64

2008-2009 30391887 44750568 0.67

 ANALYSIS This ratio is decreased in the year 2006-2007 to 0.53 when compared to 2005-2006 and further increased to 0.67 in the year 2008-2009 when compared to 2007-2008. this shows that there is an increase in the long-term solvency of the business.

Page 9: Liquidity ratios  its me

TABLE SHOWING PROPRIETORY RATIO

Proprietory Ratio0

0.10.20.30.40.50.60.7

2006-20072007-20082008-2009

INTERPRETATION:This shows that there is an increase in the long-term solvency of the business. It shows proprietor have invested their portion to the growth and welfare of the company. 

Page 10: Liquidity ratios  its me

FIXED ASSETS TO NETWORTH RATIO

Fixed Assets (After depreciation)Fixed assets to Net ---------------------------------------------worth Ratio = Shareholder’s funds

Year Fixed Asset Net worth Fixed assets to

Net worth Ratio

2006-2007 6079307 28416205 0.21

2007-2008 5378748 28057713 0.19

2008-2009 7775901 30391887 0.25

 ANALYSISThe ratio of fixed assets to net worth ratio is found to be fluctuating in the year 2006-2007 and 2007-2008. But it is slightly increased in the year 2008-2009 to 0.25.  

Page 11: Liquidity ratios  its me

TURNOVER RATIOINVENTORY TURNOVER RATIO 

SalesStock Turnover Ratio = ----------------

Inventory 

Year Sales Inventory Stock turnover

Ratio

2006-2007 483975 21 22444998 2.15

2007-2008 62649553 17500270 3.57

2008-2009 90124231 29520878 3.05

 ANALYSIS Inventory turn over ratio has decreased to 2.15 in the year 2006-2007 when compared to 2005-2006 and again increased in the year 2007-2008 to 3.57 but in the year 2008-2009 it shows a fall that is 3.05.

Page 12: Liquidity ratios  its me

GRAPH SHOWING INVENTORY TURNOVER RATIO

Stock turnover Ratio0

0.5

1

1.5

2

2.5

3

3.5

42006-20072007-20082008-2009

INTERPRETATION:From the above table, its shown the adequacy of goods available to sell in comparison to the actual sale order. Running out of stock due to low inventory (high turnover) may indicate future shortages. It also identifies of poor management.

Page 13: Liquidity ratios  its me

DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO Credit SalesDebtors Turnover Ratio = ------------------------ Average Debtors

Year Credit Sales Debtors Debtors

Turnover

Ratio

2006-2007 48397521 11818945 4.09

2007-2008 62649553 4174430 15.0

2008-2009 90124131 5947413 15.15

ANALYSIS The debtors turn over ratio has decreased to 4.09 in the year 2006-2007 and again has increased to 15.15 in the year 2008-2009.

Page 14: Liquidity ratios  its me

GRAPH SHOWING DEBTORS TURNOVER RATIO

Debtors Turnover Ratio0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

162006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

INTERPRETATION: This shows that the company is running out of cash shortage. Since credit facilities are provided to debtors, it has lead to less avoid of competitors. 

Page 15: Liquidity ratios  its me

DEBT COLLECTION PERIOD DebtorsDebt collection period = ---------------- * 365 days

Credit Sales 

Year Debtors Credit Sales Debt collection

Ratio

2006-2007 11818945 48397521 89 Days

2007-2008 4174430 62649553 24 Days

2008-2009 5947413 90124131 24 Days

ANALYSIS The debt collection period ratio remains constant in the 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 but has increased in the year 2006-2007 to 89 days .

Page 16: Liquidity ratios  its me

GRAPH SHOWING DEBT COLLECTION PERIOD RATIO

Debt collection Ratio0

10

20

30

4050

60

70

8090

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

INTERPRETATION:

The debt collection period ratio has increased to 89 days in the year 2006-2007. but has remained constant in the future i.e,24 days. Hence it shows that the company has been extending its credit facilities to customer to avoid competition.

Page 17: Liquidity ratios  its me

CREDITORS TURNOVER RATIOcredit purchases

Credit Turnover Ratio = ------------------------------------- average creditors

Year Credit purchase Creditors Creditors turn

over Ratio

2006-2007 25501189 12827919 1.98

2007-2008 32984848 7452623 4.42

2008-2009 69718267 20032834 3.48

 ANALYSIS The creditors turnover ratio has decreased to 1.98 in 2006-2007 again it is increased to 4.42 in 2007-2008 but again there is slight fall in the year 2008-2009 to 3.48. 

Page 18: Liquidity ratios  its me

GRAPH SHOWING CREDITORS TURNOVER RATIO

Creditors turn over Ratio0

0.51

1.52

2.53

3.54

4.52006-20072007-20082008-2009

INTERPRETATION:There has been a decline in creditors turn over ratio in 2006-2007 but a rise in next year and again a decline in 2008-2009

Page 19: Liquidity ratios  its me

FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER RATIO SalesFixed assets turnover ratio = ------------------

Fixed Asset

Year Sales Fixed Assets Fixed assets turn

over Ratio

2006-2007 48397521 6079307 7.96

2007-2008 62649553 5378248 11.64

2008-2009 90124131 7775901 11.59

ANALYSIS Fixed assets turnover ratio is 7.96 in the year 2006-2007 and more or less remains constant in the years 2007-2008 and 2008-2009 with slight variations standing at 11.64 and 11.59. 

Page 20: Liquidity ratios  its me

GRAPH SHOWING FIXED ASSETS TURNOVER RATIO

Fixed assets turn over Ratio0

2

4

6

8

10

122006-20072007-20082008-2009

INTERPRETATIONS:There is a an increase in fixed asset turnover ratios from year 2006-2007 and it remains almost the same for two year 2007 to 2009.

Page 21: Liquidity ratios  its me

PROFITABILITY RATIOSGROSS PROFIT RATIO

Gross profitGross profit ratio = ------------------ * 100

Sales

Year Gross

profit

Sales Gross

profit Ratio

2006-2007 ------------- 48397521 --------

2007-2008 3711530 62649553 5.92%

2008-2009 2736963 90124131 3.03%

 ANALYSIS Gross profit ratio has increased in the year 2007-2008 to 5.92% having no profits in the year 2006-2007 and shows a fall in 2008-2009 to 3.03%. 

Page 22: Liquidity ratios  its me

GRAPH SHOWING GROSS PROFIT RATIO

Gross profit Ratio0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

0.05

0.06 2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

INTERPRETATION: This shows that the gross profit relate to sales is average and the profit standpoint is that the firm be able to generate adequate profit on each unit of sales.

Page 23: Liquidity ratios  its me

NET PROFIT RATIO. Net profitNet profit ratio = ------------------- * 100

Sales

Year Net profit Sales Net profit

Ratio

2006-2007 ----------- 48397521 -------

2007-2008 ----------- 62649553 -------

2008-2009 2334174 90124131 2.6%

ANALYSIS The net profit ratio has decreased in the year 2008-2009 to 0.02% having no profit in the immediate previous years . This shows there is decline in the profitability of the company 

Page 24: Liquidity ratios  its me

GRAPH SHOWING NET PROFIT RATIO

Net profit Ratio0

0.000020.000040.000060.000080.0001

0.000120.000140.000160.000180.0002 2006-2007

2007-20082008-2009

INTERPRETATION:It is shown that net profit ratio is low which would indicate some mismanagement in the areas ex cluding production. This shows there is decline in the profitable of the company. 

Page 25: Liquidity ratios  its me

 OPERATING RATIO

Operating costOperating ratio = ------------------------ * 100 Sales

Year Operating

cost

Sales Operating

Ratio

2006-2007 15647946 48397521 32.33%

2007-2008 11102218 62649553 18%

2008-2009 21072481 90124131 23.38%

 ANALYSISThe operating ratio in the year 2005-2006 increased to 32.33% . But it is increased in the year 2007-2008 to 23.38% when compared to that of 17.72% in the year 2006-2007. So this is the reason for decline in the net profit of the company

Page 26: Liquidity ratios  its me

GRAPH SHOWING OPERATING RATIO

Operating Ratio0.00%5.00%

10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%

30.00%35.00%

2006-20072007-20082008-2009

INTERPRETATION: There was an increase in operating ratio in 2006-2007 and decline in 2007-2008 and a slight increase in 2008-2009. 

Page 27: Liquidity ratios  its me

RETURN ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED Net profit before tax

Return on capital employed = ----------------------------- * 100 capital employed

Year Profit before

tax

Capital

employed

Return on

capital employed

2006-2007 -106398 53229050 -------

2007-2008 3711530 43684184 8.5%

2008-2009 2736963 44750568 6.1%

ANALYSIS The return on capital employed ratio shows nil return on capital employed in the year 2006-2007 because of losses incurred by the company in that year. In the next year it reaches to 8.5% which is 6.1% more when compared to the one in the year 2008-2009 .

Page 28: Liquidity ratios  its me

GRAPH SHOWING RETURN ON CAPITAL EMPLOYED

Return on capital employed0

0.010.020.030.040.050.060.070.080.09

2006-2007

2007-2008

2008-2009

INTERPRETATION: Capital employed is strong in 2007 & 2008 and its decline in 2008 & 2009

Page 29: Liquidity ratios  its me

EARNING PER SHARE (EPS):

Year Number of

equity shares

Profit after

tax

Earnings

per share

2006-2007 15000 ----------- --------

2007-2008 15000 ----------- --------

2008-2009 15000 2334174 156

ANALYSIS: The earnings per share have increased to 156 in the year 2008-2009 when compared to all the remaining previous year’s earnings per share.

Net profit after tax – preference dividendEarning per share= -------------------------------------------------------------

no. of equity shares

Page 30: Liquidity ratios  its me

GRAPH SHOWING EARNING PER SHARE (EPS)

Earnings per share0

20406080

100120140160 2006-2007

2007-20082008-2009

INTERPRETATION: From the above table, it can easily understood that the company EPS is steadily progressed. The share capital of the company has increased without the proportionate increase in the net income.  

Page 31: Liquidity ratios  its me

CONCLUSION1.In spite of incurring losses ,it has successfully managed to overcome this by making profits in future, which is a good sign of prosperity to the company.

2.The long-term solvency position of the company has shown a recurrent increase.

3.The sales of the company has increased in the year 2008-2009 which indicates that the foreign companies are well satisfied with the company’s product, which is a good sign to company’s prosperity.

SUGGESTIONS1.Modern Collections should make proper financial planning so that the available funds are utilized in more efficient and effective manner.2.The company must try to maintain its short-term liquidity position, by investing only in those investments, which are easily convertable into cashThe company should reduce the idle capacity in order to increase the efficiency in the operations.3.Modern Collections must take immediate measures to reduce the length of the Operating cycle

Page 32: Liquidity ratios  its me

THANKYOU