lipa peaking plant opportunity - greenportvillageofgreenport.org/files/global-common-cogentr... ·...
TRANSCRIPT
LIPA PEAKING PLANT OPPORTUNITY
Presented to: Village of Greenport, NY
FEBRUARY 2014
1
PROJECT TEAM
§ COGENTRIX/CARLYLE
• Project owner/operator
§ GLOBAL COMMON, LLC
• Project developer
• Private energy development company
• Developed existing Greenport peaking plant, which was sold to Hawkeye Electric, Inc in 2003
§ TWOMEY LATHAM, LLP
• Project counsel
• Largest law firm in eastern Suffolk
• Extensive experience with energy and environmental issues
§ Engineering and construction
§ Environmental consulting and permitting
§ Plant operations
2
Project Benefits
§ Rent and tax revenue
§ Meet increasing peaking demands on East End
§ Replace inefficient peaking plants
§ Avoid new transmission from western LI
§ “Firm up” renewables
§ Improve local grid reliability
§ Help control energy costs
3
Introduction to
Cogentrix Energy Power Management, LLC
5
Cogentrix Energy Power Management (“Cogentrix”)
Cogentrix develops or acquires, constructs, owns, and operates power facilities. Since 1983, Cogentrix has developed 20 power plants with a total generating capability of approximately 5,100 MW and acquired 22 additional facilities with a total generating capability of approximately 4,200 MW. The company has a seasoned management team with experience in engineering, asset management and O&M across all fuel types.
Ø Independent Power Producer, founded in 1983
Ø Headquartered in Charlotte, NC Ø Owned by funds managed by The Carlyle Group, one of the
world’s largest and most diversiJied multi-‐product global alternative asset Jirms.
Ø Full compliment of in-‐house support services:
Development Asset Management
Operations Finance
Legal Environmental & Regulatory
Engineering and Construction Management
Ø Cogentrix has constructed 17 power plants, acting as EPC contractor on 13
Ø Cogentrix has operated a generation Jleet in excess of 7,000 MWs
Ø Current ownership in the U.S. includes 11 operating generation projects:
• 1,143 MW natural gas
• 478 MWs coal
• 73 MWs solar
Projects Developed by Cogentrix
6
Construction, Asset Management and O&M Experience
7
ü
Plant Fuel Type Capacity (MW) Commenced Ending Construction Management Asset Management O&M
Lumberton Coal 35 1985 2001 ü ü ü
Elizabethtown Coal 35 1985 2001 ü ü ü
Kenansville Coal 35 1986 2003 ü ü ü
Roxboro Coal 55 1987 2005 ü ü ü
Southport Coal 110 1987 2005 ü ü ü
Hopewell Coal 110 1987 Ongoing ü ü ü
Portsmouth Coal 110 1988 Ongoing ü ü ü
Rocky Mount Coal 110 1990 2010 ü ü ü
Richmond Coal 220 1992 2010 ü ü ü
River Road Natural Gas CC 248 1997 2000 ü û ü
Batesville Natural Gas CC 800 2000 2002 û û ü
Whitewater Natural Gas CC 248 1998 2010 û ü ü
Cottage Grove Natural Gas CC 235 1998 2010 ü ü ü
Rathdrum Natural Gas CC 270 2001 2010 ü ü ü
San Pedro de Macrois Oil-fired CC 300 2002 2006 ü ü ü
Green Country Natural Gas CC 810 2002 2004 ü ü ü
Ouachita Natural Gas CC 810 2002 2007 ü ü ü
Southaven Natural Gas CC 810 2002 2008 ü ü ü
Caledonia Natural Gas CC 810 2002 2004 ü ü ü
Logan Coal 220 2005 2010 û ü ü
Carneys Point Coal 260 205 2010 û ü ü
Indiantown Coal 330 2005 2010 û ü ü
Selkirk Natural Gas CC 325 2005 2010 û ü ü
Scrubgrass Waste Coal 85 2005 2010 û ü ü
Northampton Waste Coal 110 2005 2010 û ü ü
Cedar Bay Coal 258 2005 Ongoing û ü ü
Plains End I Natural Gas Peaker 113 2005 2010 û ü ü
Plains End II Natural Gas Peaker 115 2005 2010 ü ü ü
Sunray Solar thermal 43 2009 Ongoing û ü ü
Alamosa Solar CPV 30 2012 Ongoing ü ü ü
8
Cogentrix Current Operating Plants
Cedar Bay
Hopewell
Coal
Solar
Portsmouth Alamosa Sunray
Gas
Enterprise Border / Border Land
Panoche Midway
Vaca Dixon Red Oak
Overview of the Carlyle Group
9
Ø Established in Washington, D.C. in 1987, Carlyle is one of the world’s largest and most successful investment Jirms: o Over $180 billion in assets under management o More than 1,400 employees operating in 34 ofJices across 6 continents o Carlyle has expertise in various industries, including: aerospace, defense & government services, consumer & retail,
energy, Jinancial services, healthcare, industrial, technology & business services, telecommunications & media and transportation
Note: As of June 30, 2013.
East End Energy Requirements
§ Minimum 200 MW on East End
• Maximum 250 MW
• 75 MW preferred to Southold substation
– Additional capacity possible with substation expansion
• Remainder preferred to Buell, Southampton, Deerfield and Montauk substations
§ Permitting/resource constraints
• Air permit
• Fuel storage
• Water supply
§ Land requirements
• 2-5 acres
§ LIPA technology requirements
§ Lender/investor requirements
10
Project Description
§ Peaking generating units
• Gas turbine
• Low sulfur diesel fuel on East End due to limited gas supply
– Low sulfur diesel has about 1/20 as much sulfur as kerosene, which is used in the existing plant
• Existing plant has operated 484-1,055 hours per year since 2009
• New plant operations will depend on customer needs
• Maximum of 2,000 hours per year of operations under air permit
§ Unit and project size depend on location and substation constraints
• 75 MW-100 MW delivered to Southold substation
• 150 MW delivered to Deerfield and Southampton substations
11
Emissions Data for Existing Plant
12
Comparison with Permit Limits and Other Metrics § NOx emissions have been well below the annual emissions cap of 22.5 tons/
year NOx (synthetic minor), ranging from 2.5 to 5.9 tons/year (11 to 26% of NOx cap)
§ Sulfur limit is 0.05% sulfur; the facility has been burning fuel with about 0.03% sulfur (60% of limit)
§ CO2 emissions in 2013 were equivalent to about 12 cars per day
13
Project Schedule
§ Proposal submittal- March 31, 2014
§ LIPA selection- December 2014
§ Project development and permitting- Jan 2015 - Q1 2016
§ Contract execution- Q1 2016
§ Financial closing-Q1 2016
§ COD- Required <May 1, 2019
• Construction period four to 12 months
14
Business Arrangements with Village of Greenport § 2-4 acre site
§ Long-term lease
• 20 year term with extension options
• Lease payments $486,000 per year assuming 75 MW plant
• Taxes to be determined
§ Option periods to match LIPA schedule
§ Contingent on selection by LIPA
15
Discussion
§
16