linq 2013 session_green_3_aristotele

Collaborative Project – FP7- ICT- 2009 - 257886

PERSONALIZED LEARNING & COLLABORATIVE WORKING

ENVIRONMENT FOSTERING SOCIAL CREATIVITY AND

INNOVATIONS INSIDE THE ORGANISATIONS

The ARISTOTELE project

STRACKE, Christian M. & KRETSCHMER, Thomas H. University of Duisburg-Essen (Germany) & The whole ARISTOTELE project consortium

2 http://www.aristotele-ip.eu

Outline

ARISTOTELE: general information

Problems to overcome

What ARISTOTELE is about

The strategy

Evaluation

Evaluation framework

Outlook


Coordinated by CRMPA (IT)

8 partners (IT, DE, AU, SL)

6.4 M€ (4.5M€ funding by the EC) for 3 years

High strategic impact thanks to business orientation:

Two pilot partners involved in different domains (PHI and AMIS)

Starting from an existing solution (IWT)

Presence of a partner with a role of as innovator/early adopter

(ENG)

Innovative approach to conceive relations among

knowledge flows, learning objectives, and creativity

within the organization

General information


ARISTOTELE Partners

ARISTOTELE

Academic

Industrial

Pilot

Research


Outline




The strategy

Evaluation


Outlook


Problems to overcome (I)

Separation and missing interconnection between enterprise learning pathways and real contingent workers’ needs.

Missing links between learning strategies oriented to different working and organisational contexts.

Difficulty to capture and reuse formal and informal knowledge as a basis for organisational learning. Once the needed knowledge is acquired, all information on how this knowledge was built disappears

High-level fragmentation of data, information, tools and environment used by workers to operate in their working life (studying, carrying out process activities, discussing, collaborating, etc.).

Difficulty to assess, exploit, share and reuse learning experiences in terms of approach, contents and knowledge both at personal and enterprise level.

Missing of any form of Collective Intelligence.


Problems to overcome (II)

In Enterprise contexts, organizational, learning, and social collaboration

processes are, generally, managed in an isolated fashion

Users &

Technologies

Organisational

Processes

Learning

Processes

Social

Collaboration

Processes

KnowledgeCreativity

Organisational Context

requireaquired

through

shared

organised

enriched

generate

support /

foster

improve /

innovate

Competences

ARISTOTELE aims to jointly exploit

them through a sort of virtuous cycle

where intangible values (creativity,

competences, and knowledge) are

tracked and collected when

generated within processes in order

to:

Be exploited in other processes

Improve/innovate other processes

Central to this virtuous cycle are:

The worker

The enabling role of technologies


Outline




The strategy

Evaluation


Outlook



develops the ARISTOTELE platform as an online environment for personalized learning and collaborative working to foster social creativity, innovations, knowledge and HR management inside organizations

supports five defined organisational areas (Learning & Training, Human Resource Management, Collaboration, Knowledge Management, Innovation) by five machine-readable conceptual models, patterns and methodologies measured by competence-based outcome indicators.


Knowledge

Management (KM)

Semantic representation User generated content modelling and analysis Competencies updating

Collaborative

Networks

(CN)

Recommender system providing suggestions. different

configuration of the recommenders service are planned (Task

recommender, Human Resource Recommender and Crew

Recommender)

Human Resource

Management (HRM)

Competency updating

Team building

Learning Experience

Generation (LEG)

Learning and assessment

Learning experience generation

Personal Work and

Learning

Environment (PWLE)

Personal task management

Activity Stream

Receiving suggestions

Semantic Representation

Tools and capabilities


Outline




The strategy

Evaluation


Outlook


The strategy – overall view

12


Outline




The strategy

Evaluation


Outlook


Phases Evaluation Level Name ARISTOTELE Evaluation

Iterations

Conceptual

Evaluation Evaluation Level 1 (EL1) Concept Validation ---

Pilot Trial 1

Evaluation Level 2 (EL2) Usability Study 1st Evaluation Iteration

Cycle Evaluation Level 3 (EL3) User Validation of Tools

Pilot Trial 2 Evaluation Level 4 (EL4)

Software Validation

and

Impact Measurement

2nd Evaluation Iteration

Cycle

Evaluation (I)


Evaluation (II)

Phases Level Name Methodologies

Conceptual

Evaluation Level 1

Concept Validation

(qualitative evaluation)

Phase 1: Individual Experts Reviews

(internal and external experts)

Phase 2: SWOT Analysis from Focus Group

Pilot Trial 1

Level 2 Usability Study

(qualitative evaluation) Cognitive Walkthrough

Level 3

User Validation of Tools

(qualitative and

quantitative evaluation)

Functional Testing

Quantitative Survey (Online Questionnaire)

Pilot Trial 2 Level 4

Software Validation and

Impact Measurement

(qualitative and

quantitative evaluation)

Phase 1: Software Validation

Functional Testing

(Validation and Verification)

Extended Oral Feedback on Usability

Aspects (if needed)

Phase 2: Impact Measurement

Semi-Structured Interviews on Impact

(Platform and Tools)

Impact measurement (KPI)

Quantitative Survey

(Online Questionnaire)


Outline




The strategy

Evaluation


Outlook


Evaluation level 4 started in March 2013 with

preparations for pilot trial II to establish the non-

treatment groups

Due to the complexity of the object to be evaluated

(integrated ARISTOTELE platform with all tools),

an extended pilot trial II is envisaged

Final platform ready for July 2013

Outlook

Thank you!

Any questions?

[email protected] www.aristotele-ip.eu

mailto:[email protected]



http://www.aristotele-ip.eu/



linq 2013 session_green_3_aristotele

Technology