linguistic development thomas g. bowers, ph.d. 2001
TRANSCRIPT
Linguistic Development
Thomas G. Bowers, Ph.D.2001
Linguistic DevelopmentLanguage development is one of the more significant cognitive abilities among humansLanguage is the primary means of transmitting and communicating knowledge
Linguistic DevelopmentField of Linguistics
Attempts to characterize the nature of languageChomsky (1959)
Focused on productivity and regularity of language There is a nearly infinite range of vocal behaviors Utterances are systematic and organized Difficult to explain from a solely behavioral perspective
Linguistic DevelopmentComponents of language
Syntax – highly structural aspects of grammar, including the impact of word order and inflectionSemantics – concerned with the meaningfulness and significance of languagePhonology – concerned with the sound structure of language material
Linguistic DevelopmentComponents of language
There are intuitive aspects of language use and understanding
Eg – “The boy was hit by the girl.” “The girl hit the boy.”
Experienced individuals readily manage ambiguity of language
Syntactical StructureLinguistic analysis focuses on the orderly structure of languagesPhase structure commonly noted
Noun, verb, noun phraseAdjective and articles common
Syntactical Structure
SyntaxPeople resolve ambiguity by subtle cues from time to time
They are cooking apples – perhaps the act of making a pieThey are cooking apples – perhaps the object used to make a pieMay depend upon inflection, contextl
SyntaxPhrase structure has some research history
Pauses tend to occur in grammatical junctures, with shorter pauses within the clauses
People manage meaningful stimulus transformations with little difficulty
Theoretical Accounts for Language Development
Behavioral versus Linguistic ViewsWatson (1930) maintained that thought was simply a pattern of sub vocal speechRecording of sub vocal speech appeared to be indicated during some thought process but not all examples
Theoretical Accounts for Language Development
Behavioral versus Linguistic ViewsClassic Experiment
Smith, Brown, Toman and Goodman (1947) Applied a curare derivative Results in muscle paralysis, but respiration can be
maintained by mechanical means Smith volunteered as subject Was to comprehend, report, remember and think about
activity around him
Theoretical Accounts for Language Development
Behavioral versus Linguistic ViewsClassic Experiment
Smith, Brown, Toman and Goodman (1947) It appears clear thinking can occur in the absence of
muscular activity
Theoretical Accounts for Language Development
Linguistic AnalysisLinguistic determinationLanguage is thought to be “prepared” more readily acquired than other types of behaviorsWhorf (1956) felt languages reflected different aspects of their worldIt is possible that language developed to express thought
Theoretical Accounts for Language Development
Linguistic AnalysisLanguage acquisition appears to occur rapidly, and may be sensitive to critical periodsGrammar appears to develop as an implicit processSome theorists claim we are prepared as a species to acquire linguistic behaviors
Theoretical Accounts for Language Development
Linguistic AnalysisChomsky (1970) explains language acquisition as a natural phenomenonChildren appear to be able to learn language in the absence of any inputChildren acquire language even sub optimal circumstancesAbilities to acquire second languages deteriorates with age
Theoretical Accounts for Language Development
Linguistic AnalysisChomsky continues to argue there are language universals, and hence most languages are natural languages