linda simmons v seaworld
TRANSCRIPT
IN THECIRCUIT COURT THE OF EIGHTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FORBREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA LINDASIMONS, Plarntrff, v
t z zt', 9 l$-.Y*xxx-xx UWCase Noo9= *i-i-t-l
etCn (/tlrt v -c
ht Cf
SEAWORLD FLORIDA OF LLC,SEA WORLDLLC, SEAWORLD PARKS& ENTERTAINMENT , and SEAWORLD INC PARKS& ENTERTAINMENT LLC, Defendants
iJ r, .1 'c' r:lt
'r-ia; -o r---r
C)
ri \ vrrtI
1'O1-r_I L'll
=6J
t\) J
5*ou.ft*ttGOMPLAINT AND DEMAND FORJURYTRIAL JURISDICTION VENUE ANDPlarntff, LINDAslMONS,by and through undersrgned her counsel, sues Defendants, SEAWoRLDLLC,SEAWORLD PARKS& ENTERTATNMENT, lNc , SEAWORLD PARKS ENTERTATNMENT and SEAWORLD & LLC, oF FLORIDA LLC,(heretnafter referred as Defendants), alleges followrng to and the 1 2 3 Thtsts an acttonln excessof the mtnlmum yunsdrctlon thls Court of Plalntrff a resrdent Brevard rs of County Defendant SEAWORLD FLORIDA OF LLC rsa Florrda Corporatron
authonzed dolngbuslness the Stateof Florrda and rn 4 Defendant SEAWORLDLLC rs a Forergn Corporatron authorzed 2010_cA " ' r XXXX 0s1145 -)0\
and dorngbusrness the state of Flonda rn
inl nnr,llt rnn'rn |l|il{'ll|l,lutflliil tfit'fi,ra4krj
.""":j^o^:n t p a o e,f D.ocume
\-!
5
Defendant SEAWORLD PARKS ENTERTAINMENT, rsa & tNC
Foretgn Corporatron authonzed dorngbusrness the Stateof Florrda and rn 6 Defendant SEAWORLD PARKS& ENTERTATNMENT rs a LLC
Foretgn Corporatlon authonzed dorngbusrness the Stateof Florrda and rn 7 Venuels properrn Brevard Countybecause bulkof the the
damages occurred Brevard rn county Addrtronally, Defendants are headquartered OrangeCounty, Countywhrchrsadlacent Brevard ln a to County, encompassed the Ffth DrstrtctDefendants powerful by are corporatrons whrch part are an rntegral of the OrangeCountyEconomyPlarntrff requtres neutral a venue,suchas Brevard County, orderto havea farrtnal rn
BACKGROUND 8 On February 16th, 2010,Plalntrff hrredby Defendants the was as
Drrector Healthand Safety of 9 On February 24,2010,Defendants' employee, DawnBrancheau,
was krlled an Orca by 10 On February 24,2010,OSHA,a Federal Agency, beganan rn
depthrnvestrgafion 11 Plarntrff asstgned the harson was as between Defendants the and
OSHArnvestrgatlon 12 Plarntrff told by Defendants obstruct lnvestrgatron, was to the
manrpulate documents, wlthhold documents, makewftnesses unavarlable, and
'{a4Wj
othertmproprtettes whtchwere unlawful, whena government agencyrsdorngan rnvestlgatron 13 Plalnttff votcedher concerns wrthmanagement refused and to
partrcrpate the rllegal rn actrons whrch weredemanded Defendants by 14 On or aboutApnl22,2010, Plarntrff termrnated, vrolatron was rn of
29 u s c S 660,and F s 448 102(2) and 448 102(g), cooperatrng an for wrth OSHArnvestrgatron 15 16 ln May,2010Plarntff frled OSHAretahatron an complarnt In August 2010,Plarntrff a request arbtratron address frled for to her
employment dtspute tssues, requrred Defendants' as by mandatory arbrtratron program 17 On August23,2010, OSHArnvestrgatron found an report
Defendants haveactedwtthreckless to drsregard humanlrfeand frned for Defendants maxrmum of $70,000 the ftne 00 18 Prtorto the OSHAreportcomrng out,thereweretwo reports that
were berngcontemplated osHA one by the osHA rnvestrgator, by Laura Pagett, and one whrch was craftedby the OSHAAtlantaoffrce Dueto "polrtrcal pressures," osHA Atlanta the offrce and the osHA washrngton offrcegot rnvolved the preparatron the reports rn of 19 Platntff,tn orderto brrng eventsthatweretransprrrng the the to
publrc, decrded truthfully to conveywhatwas occurnng manyformsof the to medra
rra4 krj
20
on August23,2010, Plarntff appeared GoodMornrng rn Amerrca,
Insrde Edrtron, LarryKrngLrve, and partrcrpated manyotherrntervrews ln 21 On Augustz(,2010,Plarntrff appeared MSNBC also on and Fox
Busrness Network, wellas gave manyotherrntervrews as 22 Addrtpnally, Plarntrff spokewrthmanynewspapers rncrudrng the
chrcago sun, the NewYorkDarly News,orlandosentrnel, manyothers and 23 ln response, Defendants out a masstve set falsePubhcRelatrons
campatgn defameand slanderPlarntrff to 24 All of the acttonable clarms Plarnttff form partof thrs of that
complarnt occurred or afterAugust20, 2010 on 25 Plarntffhas retarned undersrgned the attorney and agreedto pay
hrma reasonable fee
COUNT I DEFAMATORY SLANDER PERSE AND PERQUOD 26 Platnttff realleges tncorporates paragraphs through25 of thrs and 1
Complarnt f set forthrnfull herern as 27 AfterAugust20, 2010Defendants madenumerous falseand
defamatory statements concerntng Plarntrff 28 The slanderous statements were unpnvrleged were made and
pubhc thrrdpartresThe thrrdpartres to rncluded GoodMornrng The Amenca show, LarryKrngLrve,MSNBC, newspapers fromaroundthe world,and many others
'ra4krj
29a b c
The slanderous statements rnclude Ms Srmons extorttng rs Defendants Platnttff termlnated Defendants to poorperformance was by due Ms Stmons repeatedly demonstrated rnabrlrty conduct an to herself to the acceptable standards competence of Ms Srmons repeatedly demonstrated rnabrlrty conduct an to herself wrthtransparency Ms Srmons repeatedly demonstrated lnabrlrty conductherself an to wtthrntegnty Ms Stmons repeatedly demonstrated rnabrlrty conduct an to herself wrthprofessronahsm Ms Srmons clatms agarnst Defendants false are Ms Srmons brought has uponunfounded charges Ms Stmons askedfor moneyrn exchange not go pubhc wrthher to clarms At the ttmeof the termrnatron, Defendants offeredmoneyto the
g hI
30
Platnttff exchange Plarntff's tn for srlence and release her clarms Plarntrff of refused srgnthe agreement to 31 Defendants'statements rntentronal mallclous the were In and
alternatrve, were neghgent they 32 The abovestatements defamatory are and/orare suscephble a of
defamatory meantng that they sublect rn Plarntrff hatred, to ndrcule, drstrust, contempt, rrdrcule, obloquy, and drsgrace 33 The abovestatements therrmeantngs falseand and are
Defendants, the trmeof makrng statements, at the knewtheywerefalseor had senousdoubtsas to therrtruth 34 35 The abovestatements assertrons fact,notoptntons are of As a drrect and proxrmate resultof the aboveslanderous
statements, Platntff, LINDA SIMONS, sustarned has pecuntary drrect rndrrect or
rra4 krj
lossrncludrng, not lrmrted lostearnlngs, workrng but to, lost trme,lossof fees, personal busrness, reputatron, growth, and lossof abllrty earn money to Addrtpnally, Plarntff, LINDAslMONS,has sustarned shame, mentar angursh, personal humlhatton, feeltngs, hurt mentalsufferrng, tn1ury reputatron and to and health, the pastand rnthe future All of the abovedamages contrnurng tn are and permanent nature tn 36 Addftronally, a resultof the slanderous as statements, Plarnttff has
beendamagedThe slanderous statements were a drrect attackon Plarntff's professtonal character standrng and Addrtronally, slanderous the statements contatn allegatrons Plarntrff commrtted cnmeof moralturpttude that has a 37 Platnttff entrtled punrtrve ts to damages thrscaseas the above rn
slanderous statements were mademahcrously, wrllfully, wantonly, wrtha and reckless dtsregard the rrghts PlarntrffThe prrmary for purpose makrng of rn the abovestatements to rndulge wrll,hostrlrty to harmthe PlarntrffThe was rll and statements were destgned destroy reputatron Plarntrff Defendants' to the of for pecunlary galn and furtherance therr of falsePubhc Relatrons campatgn the at unlustexpense Plarntrff of 38 Addtttonally, Plarntffrsentrtled rnlunctrve to rehef prevent to
Defendants from conttnurng defamePlarntrff to WHEREFORE Plarntrff, LINDA SIMONS suesthe Defendants for tnluncttve rehef prevent to and stopDefendants fromcontrnurng slander to and defamePlatntff, compensatory punrtrve and damages excessof the mtntmum In
'ra4 krl
ltmtts and whrch Jurlsdtcttonal of thrsCourt,pluscosts,rnterest all otherdamages Plarntrff may be entrtled and demandtrralby lury to, COUNT II DEFAMATORY LIBEL 39 Platntlff realleges rncorporates paragraphs through of thrs and 1 38
Complarnt rf set forthrnfull herern as 40 AfterAugust20, 2010Defendant madenumerous falseand
defamatory hbelous wrrtten statements concerntng Plarntrff wnttenforrn rn 41 42 One of the hbelous statements attached Exhrbrt rs as A The ltbelous statements were unprrvrleged were madepubhc and to
thtrdparttesThe thrrdpartres rncluded GoodMornrng The Amerrca Show,Larry KrngLrve,MSNBC, newspapers from aroundthe world,and manyothers 43 a b c d e f g h t 44 The slanderous statements rnclude Ms Srmons extortrng rs Defendants Platntffwas termtnated Defendants to poorperformance by due Ms Stmons repeatedly demonstrated tnabrlrty conduct an to herself to the acceptable standards competence of Ms Srmons repeatedly demonstrated rnabrlrty conduct an to herself wth transparency Ms Stmons repeatedly demonstrated rnabrlrty conduct an to herself wrthrntegrrty Ms Stmons repeatedly demonstrated rnabrlrty conduct an to herself wrthprofessronahsm Ms Srmons clarms agarnst SeaWorld false are Ms Srmons brought has uponunfounded charges Ms Stmons askedfor moneyrn exchange not go pubhc to wrthher clarms Defendants'statements rntentronal malrcrous the were and ln
alternatrve, were neglrgent they
/ra4 krj
45
The abovewnttenstatements defamatory are and/orare
susceptrble a defamatory of meanlng thattheysublectPlarntrff hatred, In to drstrust, rrdrcule, obloquy, contempt, dlsgrace and 46 The abovewnttenstatements therrmeantngs false,and and are
Defendants, the trmeof maktng wnttenstatements, at the knewthey werefalse or had senousdoubtsas to therrtruth 47 o p r n l o ns 48 As a drrect and proxrmate resultof the abovehbelous statements, The abovewrrttenstatements an assertron facts, not are of
Platntff, LINDASIMONS, sustarned pecunlary has drrect rndrrect or loss rncludrng, not hmfted lostearntngs, workrng but to, lost trme,lossof fees, personal growth, busrness, reputatron, and lossof abrlrty earn money to Addrtronally, Plarntff, LINDASIMONS, sustarned has mental shame, angursh, personal humrhatron, feehngs, hurt mentalsufferrng, rn;ury reputatron and to and health,ln the pastand rn the future All of the abovedamages contrnurng are and permanent nature rn 49 Addtttonallyr a resultof the ltbelous as statements, Plarntffhas
beendamagedThe hbelous statements were a drrect attackon Plarntlffs professtonal character standrngAddrtronally, hbelous and the statements contaln allegatrons Plarntrff commrtted cnmeof moralturprtude that has a 50 Platnttff entrtled punftrve rs to damages thrscaseas the above rn
Irbelous statements were mademahcrously, wrllfully, wantonly, wrtha and reckless dtsregard the rrghts PlarntrffThe prrmary for purpose maklng of rn the
ra4 krj
abovestatements to rndulge was rllwrll, hostrlrty to harmthe PlarntlffThe and wrttten statements weredesrgned destroy reputatron Plarntrff to the of for pecuntary Defendants' garnand furtherance therrfalsePubhcRelattons of campatgn the unlustexpense Plarntrff at of WHEREFORE Plarntrff, LINDASIMONS suesthe Defendants for tnluncttve reltef, compensatory punrtrve and damages excessof the mtntmum tn ltmtts thrsCourt,pluscosts,rnterest, all otherdamages of and whrch lunsdtcttonal Plarntffmay be entrtled and demandtnal by lury to,
DEMAND FORJURY TRIAL Plarntrff demands Jury on all rssues a trral herern tnable by.lury DATED thrs3l st dayof August, 2010ARCADIER ASSOCIATES, A & P
Maurrce Arcadrer, Esqu Florrda No 131180 Bar Attorneys Plarntrff for2815W NewHaven Ave,#304 W Melbourne, Flonda32904 Phone (321)953-5998 Fax (321)953-6075
rra4krj